JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016
ª 2016 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION
ISSN 0735-1097/$36.00
PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.060
THE PRESENT AND FUTURE REVIEW TOPIC OF THE WEEK
Hyperkalemia in Heart Failure Chaudhry M.S. Sarwar, MD,a Lampros Papadimitriou, MD, PHD,a Bertram Pitt, MD,b Ileana Piña, MD, MPH,c Faiez Zannad, MD,d Stefan D. Anker, MD, PHD,e Mihai Gheorghiade, MD,f Javed Butler, MD, MPH, MBAa
ABSTRACT Disorders of potassium homeostasis can potentiate the already elevated risk of arrhythmia in heart failure. Heart failure patients have a high prevalence of chronic kidney disease, which further heightens the risk of hyperkalemia, especially when renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are used. Acute treatment for hyperkalemia may not be tolerated in the long term. Recent data for patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, used to treat and prevent high serum potassium levels on a more chronic basis, have sparked interest in the treatment of hyperkalemia, as well as the potential use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients who were previously unable to take these drugs or tolerated only low doses. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and outcomes of hyperkalemia in heart failure; provides an overview of traditional and novel ways to approach management of hyperkalemia; and discusses the need for further research to optimally treat heart failure. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1575–89) © 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
H
yperkalemia
threatening
(RAASi) are at 2 to 3 times higher risk for hyperkale-
because of the associated risk for arrhyth-
can
be
life
mia (4–6). In hospitalized patients admitted with
mias and conduction system abnormalities
worsening HF, despite aggressive diuresis, increases
(1,2). Generally, a serum potassium level higher than
in serum potassium levels are observed (7). With
5.0 mmol/l is defined as hyperkalemia (1). Among pa-
growing numbers of CKD and HF patients taking
tients hospitalized for any cause, the prevalence of
RAASi and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
hyperkalemia has been estimated at 1% to 10% (3). Pa-
(MRAs), hyperkalemia has become a more common
tients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart fail-
concern. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
ure (HF), and diabetes mellitus and those using
(ACEi), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), and
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
MRAs have proven benefit in patients who are also
system
inhibitors
From the aCardiology Division, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; bCardiology Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; cCardiology Division, Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Bronx, New York; dINSERM, Centre d’Investigation Clinique 9501 and Unité 961, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, and the Department of Cardiology, Nancy University, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France; eInnovative Clinical Trials, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany; and the fCenter for Cardiovascular Drug Development and Innovation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Dr. Pitt is a compensated board member for Novartis; consultant for Takeda, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GE Healthcare, Relypsa, BG Medicine, Nile Therapeutics, Merck, Forest Laboratories, and Novartis; has received grant support from Forest Laboratories and Novartis; and holds stock in Relypsa, BG Medicine, Nile Therapeutics, and Aurasenc. Dr. Piña is a consultant for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; and is on the advisory board of Novartis. Dr. Zannad is a compensated board member for Boston Scientific; consultant for Novartis, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GE Healthcare, Relypsa, Servier, Boston Scientific, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, and Resmed; and is a compensated speaker with Pfizer Listen to this manuscript’s
and AstraZeneca. Dr. Anker has received honoraria from and is a consultant for ThermoFisher Scientific, Cardiorentis, Bayer
audio summary by
HealthCare AG, ZS Pharma, Relypsa, Novartis Pharma AG, and Vifor Pharma. Dr. Gheorghiade has consulted for Abbott Labora-
JACC Editor-in-Chief
tories, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare AG, CorThera, Cytokinetics, DebioPharm SA, Errekappa Terapeutici, Glaxo-
Dr. Valentin Fuster.
SmithKline, Ikaria, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis Pharma AG, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Palatin Technologies, Pericor Therapeutics, Protein Design Laboratories, Sanofi, Sigma Tau, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Trevena Therapeutics. Dr. Butler has received research support from the National Institutes of Health and the European Union; and is a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiocell, Celladon, Novartis, Trevena, Relypsa, Z Pharma, and Zensun. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Manuscript received June 20, 2016; accepted June 28, 2016.
1576
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
ABBREVIATIONS
at high risk for hyperkalemia (8). Even more
circulation, and liver (12). A role for the pituitary
AND ACRONYMS
challenging is the fact that many patients
gland in potassium homeostasis has been shown in
have several of these comorbidities simulta-
rats where renal potassium excretion was impaired
neously and are attempting to use 1 or more
post-hypophysectomy (16,17). In human subjects,
RAASi together. Thus, many patients in
hourly increased renal and gastrointestinal potassium
blocker
need for these therapies are unable to
excretion after 35 mmol of oral potassium persisted
CKD = chronic kidney disease
tolerate them, or if these medicines are pre-
following
scribed, they are prescribed at less than
gastrointestinal-renal kaliuretic signaling axis that is
ACEi = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
ARB = angiotensin receptor
eGFR = estimated glomerular
aldosterone
blockade,
suggesting
a
filtration rate
optimal dosages. RAASi discontinuation for
independent of the changes in serum potassium
HF = heart failure
hyperkalemia represents an undesirable clin-
concentration and aldosterone (18).
MRA = mineralocorticoid
ical compromise. Importantly, many clinical
receptor antagonist
trials have excluded patients with advanced
RAASi = renin-angiotensin-
CKD and those with or at risk for hyperkale-
aldosterone system inhibitor
mia, leaving a critical evidence gap in phar-
ZS-9 = sodium zirconium
macotherapy for these high-risk patients.
HYPERKALEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH HF: ROLE OF RENAL DISEASE AND THERAPY Approximately 26 million people globally have HF (19). These patients, by virtue of their disease, comorbid-
cyclosilicate
POTASSIUM HOMEOSTASIS
ities, and medical therapy, are at risk for hyperkalemia. Hyperkalemia can be classified into 2 types:
Under
normal
circumstances,
the
kidneys
are
responsible for excreting 90% of the potassium that is consumed daily (9). Most of the potassium is freely filtered by the glomerulus and is absorbed in the proximal tubule and loop of Henle, and only 10% reaches the distal tubule (10,11). Principal cells in the renal collecting duct are responsible for secreting excess potassium from the circulation into the tubular lumen and excreting it in the urine. Luminal membrane potassium channels that respond to the
1. Inherent hyperkalemia: includes hormonal disorders
(e.g.,
Addison’s
disease,
hyporeninemic
hypoaldosteronism), diabetes mellitus, CKD, and diseases with cell membrane instability that can cause intracellular and extracellular potassium shifts (20,21); and 2. Treatment-related
hyperkalemia:
medications
(e.g., RAASi, MRA, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, diuretic agents, heparin).
electrochemical gradient for potassium generated by
In addition, excess dietary intake of foods high in
the basolateral membrane sodium-potassium adeno-
potassium or sodium supplements containing high
sine triphosphatase (Na þ/K þ-ATPase) and a luminal
potassium content can cause hyperkalemia (22–24)
membrane sodium channel accomplish this secretion.
(Figures 2 and 3). MRAs or RAASi increase the risk of
In states of potassium depletion, potassium secretion
hyperkalemia (25). As the use of RAASi has increased,
by the principal cells is inhibited, and the luminal
especially in higher doses and in combination (26–29),
membrane hydrogen-potassium adenosine triphos-
hyperkalemia has become more common. The use of
phatase (Hþ/Kþ-ATPase) is activated in the interca-
ACEi is attributed to the development of hyper-
lated cells to reabsorb the potassium (Figure 1) (12).
kalemia in 10% to 38% of hospitalized patients (3,30),
Secretion of potassium by the collecting duct is
whereas hyperkalemia develops in up to 10% of the
regulated by the serum aldosterone and sodium
outpatient population within 1 year of prescribing
concentration in the distal tubule (11). Aldosterone is
RAASi (31). Patients with impaired renal function and
regulated by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone sys-
those with diabetes are at higher risk of hyperkalemia
tem (RAAS) and by serum potassium levels (13). In
(11). In the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective comparison of
HF, when the renal perfusion pressure falls, juxta-
ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mor-
glomerular
converts
tality and morbidity in Heart Failure) trial, despite
angiotensinogen to angiotensin II, in conjunction
renal function, potassium-based eligibility criteria,
with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) (14).
and a run-in period, approximately 15% of patients in
Angiotensin II acts on zona glomerulosa of the adre-
both the LCZ696 and the enalapril arms developed
nal glands and stimulates aldosterone secretion. High
hyperkalemia (32). In a recent HF study (n ¼ 19,194),
serum potassium is also a stimulator of aldosterone,
11.3% of patients had hyperkalemia over a mean
which lowers serum potassium by stimulating potas-
follow-up of 3.9 3.2 years, yielding an incidence of
cells
secrete
renin,
which
2.90/100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]:
sium excretion from distal tubule (13,15). Increased potassium intake increases kaliuresis, and
it
is
postulated
that
potassium
receptors
also reside in gastrointestinal tract, enterohepatic
2.78 to 3.02) (33). Similarly,
in
RALES
(Randomized
Aldactone
Evaluation Study), although the beneficial effect of
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
F I G U R E 1 Segmental Handling of Potassium Under Normal Conditions or With Potassium Excess or Deficiency
Normal or high K intake: Reabsorbs ∼67% of filtered K
Normal or high K intake: Secretes 10%-50% of filtered K Low K: Reabsorbs ∼3% of filtered K
Low K: Reabsorbs ∼67% of filtered K
Na+
DT
Lumen
Collecting Duct
Glom
Proximal Tubule
K+
Secretion
Principal cell K+
CCD
Normal or high K intake: Reabsorbs ∼25% of filtered K
Normal or high K intake: Secretes 5%-30% of filtered K
MTAL
Low K: Reabsorbs ∼25% of filtered K
2K+ ATP ADP+Pi Blood 3Na+
Low K: Reabsorbs ∼10% of filtered K
OMCD
K+ Lumen ATP Loop of Henle
ADP+Pi
IMCD
ATP ADP+Pi H+ H+ Intercalated cell 2K+
K+ ATP ADP+Pi
Reabsorption Blood
Normal or high K intake: Secretes 15%-80% of filtered K
Low K: Reabsorbs ∼1% of filtered K
3Na+
Excess potassium is secreted into the tubule lumen and urine by the principal cells in the collecting duct. The secretion is medicated by the potassium channels in the luminal membrane, which respond to the electrochemical gradient for potassium generated by the combined action of the basolateral membrane sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (Naþ/Kþ-ATPase) and a luminal membrane sodium channel. With potassium depletion, potassium secretion by the principal cells is inhibited, and the luminal membrane hydrogen-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (Hþ/Kþ-ATPase) is activated in the intercalated cells to reclaim the potassium that remains in the tubular fluid, thereby limiting urinary potassium wasting. Reprinted with permission from Greenlee et al. (12). ADP ¼ adenosine diphosphate; ATP ¼ adenosine triphosphate; CCD ¼ cortical collecting duct; DT ¼ distal tubule; Glom ¼ glomerulus; H ¼ hydrogen; IMCD ¼ inner medullary collecting duct; K ¼ potassium; MTAL ¼ medullary thick ascending limb of Henle loop; Na ¼ sodium; OMCD ¼ outer medullary collecting duct; Pi ¼ inorganic phosphate.
spironolactone continued in the treatment group
increased to 11 of 1,000 patients in 2001 compared
versus placebo, despite higher potassium levels in the
with 2.4 of 1,000 patients in 1994 (p < 0.001) (8).
treatment group (4.54 0.49 mmol/l vs. 4.28 0.50
Additionally, the rate of in-hospital hyperkalemia-
mmol/l, respectively; p < 0.001), a higher mortality
associated death in HF patients increased from 0.10 of
risk was observed when potassium levels increased
1,000 patients in 1994 to 0.39 of 1,000 patients in 2001
to more than 5.5 mmol/l in the spironolactone group
(p < 0.001) (8). These data underscore both the
(34). The beneficial effect of spironolactone compared
importance of hyperkalemia when augmenting RAASi
with placebo was maintained at all levels of hyper- or
and the need for careful monitoring of electrolytes.
hypokalemia, showing a U-shaped relationship be-
Hyperkalemia risk is increased with concomitant
tween potassium levels and mortality, with higher
CKD in HF patients. In 105,388 HF patients enrolled in
mortality rates in patients randomized to placebo at all
the ADHERE (Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
potassium levels (p < 0.0001) (34). The use of spi-
National Registry) study, more than 60% of patients
ronolactone increased after the RALES trial; however,
had kidney disease (35). In patients with CKD, the
the hospitalizations attributed to hyperkalemia also
prevalence of hyperkalemia can be up to 20% and is
1577
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
F I G U R E 2 Hyperkalemia in Heart Failure Patients Increases as Renal Function Declines
35 Rate of Hyperkalemia (% of Patients)
30.2 30 25.6 25 18.2
20 15.4
15 10
13.3 8.5
6.0
6.7
5 0
Baseline eGFR ≥60
No WRF
Baseline eGFR <60
Baseline Renal Function
WRF
Intra-study Change in Renal Function
Placebo
Spironolactone
Impaired renal function increases the risk of hyperkalemia in both the patients taking placebo and the MRA-treated patients. Modified with permission from Go et al. (23). eGFR ¼ estimated glomerular filtration rate; MRA ¼ mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; WRF ¼ worsening renal function.
associated with the risk of mortality and major
potassium should be stopped or used judiciously
adverse cardiovascular events and discontinuation
under supervision. It may be preferable to use lower
of RAASi (36). The use of RAASi in patients with
doses of both RAASi and MRAs rather than higher
cardiovascular
myocardial
doses of one and not to use the other class of drugs
infarction, HF, diabetes, and CKD, can reduce adverse
altogether. Higher doses of ACEi and ARBs are asso-
long-term consequences (37). However, most trials
ciated with better outcomes in HF with reduced
excluded patients with moderate or severe CKD,
ejection fraction (38,39). However, this benefit is
which is common in HF, especially at advanced stages
modest, and lower doses were better tolerated. Thus,
(37).
lower doses of RAASi are better than avoiding these
diseases,
including
The use of effective and safe potassium binders
drugs. In case of worsening renal function, the risk of
now provides an opportunity to assess RAASi in such
hyperkalemia and the rate of decline in renal function
patients. In the meantime, several steps can be taken
should be assessed. There are no specific guidelines,
to attempt RAASi therapy in such patients. First,
but generally, ACEi or ARB doses may be reduced
potassium supplements or salt substitutes containing
or stopped, either temporarily or permanently, with
F I G U R E 3 Prevalence of Heart Failure and Diabetes Mellitus in Relation to Chronic Kidney Disease
Heart Failure
Diabetes
35
31.1 28.2
30 Prevalence (%)
1578
25
20.8
19.6
18.5
20 15
12.6
12.3 8.6
10 5.2 5 0
N=
1.0 >60
45-59
30-44 15-29 >15 eGFR mL/min/1.73m2 924,136 153,426 34,275 7085 1373
>60
45-59
30-44
15-29
>15
924,136 153,426 34,275
7085
1373
Prevalence of heart failure and diabetes mellitus may increase the risk of hyperkalemia on the basis of disease and concomitant therapies. Modified with permission from Go et al. (23). eGFR ¼ estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
MAINTENANCE. In addition to dietary potassium
T A B L E 1 Treatment Options for Hyperkalemia
Severity
intake restriction, lowering the dose of drugs that
Treatment
impair potassium excretion or administering them
Emergent
Calcium gluconate Insulin Beta-adrenoreceptor agonists
every other day or totally discontinuing them is often
Intermediate
Dialysis Loop diuretic agents Thiazide diuretic agents Sodium bicarbonate in patients with metabolic acidosis.
dietary and herbal supplements and salt substitutes
Maintenance
needed (11). This should include a review of all as well. Potassium-binding resins can also be used; however, until recently, the only approved ionexchange resin was sodium polystyrene sulfonate,
Review of medication list and dietary supplements Low-potassium diet Reduce dose of renin-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Stop offending medications Potassium-binding resins
which was not well tolerated and may cause colonic necrosis and intestinal injury (43). Patiromer has recently become available for use, expanding the armamentarium of therapies available for the management of these patients. However, chronic therapy targeting prevention of hyperkalemia
estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 to 30
and subsequent optimization of RAASi needs further
ml/min, whereas they can be used in dialysis patients
studies.
with careful monitoring. Currently, MRAs are contraindicated in patients with eGFR <30 ml/min. In
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF
hospitalized patients receiving intravenous diuretic
HYPERKALEMIA IN HF
agents who have rapid changes in renal function with or without hypotension, holding or lowering RAASi is
A close association exists between serum potassium
common. However, this decision should be individ-
and plasma renin concentration in HF (44). Renin
ualized, and currently, evidence for what to do in
elevation due to renal hypoperfusion in HF causes the
such a situation is not available.
excretion of potassium by stimulating the synthesis of
According to the Health Care Cost and Utilization
aldosterone, whereas high potassium concentrations
Project database, in 2011, the estimated total annual
can directly inhibit the RAAS (45). ACEi block the
charges for Medicare admissions with hyperkalemia
stimulatory effect of angiotensin II on aldosterone
as the primary diagnosis were $697 million, the
secretion, whereas ARBs prevent angiotensin II from
average Medicare length of stay was 2 to 3 days with
binding to its adrenal receptors (45). In addition, these
mean charges of $24,085 per day, and one-third of the
drugs may interfere with angiotensin I produced
patients were discharged to another short-term hos-
locally within the adrenal glands (14). RAASi, such as
pital or home health care (40).
ACEi, ARBs, MRAs, and direct renin inhibitors, are
CURRENT MANAGEMENT OF HYPERKALEMIA The treatment of hyperkalemia depends on the severity and cause (Table 1).
associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia, particularly when administered in combination (46). This risk is increased in patients with stage 3 or higher CKD; hence, dual RAAS blockade is of concern in this scenario (47). Hyperkalemia can also develop sec-
EMERGENT MANAGEMENT. In patients with electro-
ondary to decreased sodium delivery to the distal
cardiographic
nephron, aldosterone deficiency, and abnormal func-
changes
and/or
potassium
levels
>7.0 mmol/l, intravenous calcium is administered to
tioning of the cortical collecting tubule (11). These
prevent arrhythmia (41). To rapidly lower potassium
abnormalities can result from the effects of other
levels, insulin and beta-2 adrenoreceptor agonists are
drugs or from underlying diseases.
used to redistribute potassium from the extracellular
In normal circumstances, the serum aldosterone
to the intracellular space; however, this is a tempo-
concentration varies inversely with delivery of
rary measure (11).
sodium to the distal nephron, so that potassium
INTERMEDIATE MANAGEMENT. Dialysis can be used
excretion remains independent of changes in extrafluid
in patients with poor kidney function or in those who
cellular
are unresponsive to other treatments. In patients
increased aldosterone causes increased absorption of
with CKD and metabolic acidosis, sodium bicarbonate
sodium
therapy is an effective strategy to minimize increases
decreased delivery to the distal nephrons, which in
in the potassium concentration (42). Loop diuretic
turn, results in decreased potassium excretion. The
agents are effective in excretion of potassium by the
use of RAASi in the presence of tubulointerstitial
delivery of sodium in the collecting duct (11).
renal disease increases the risk of hyperkalemia by
in
volume
proximal
(9–11). tubules,
However, resulting
in in
HF, its
1579
1580
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
T A B L E 2 Comparison of Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate, Patiromersorbitex Calcium (RLY5016), and Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate (ZS-9)
Characteristic
Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate
Patiromersorbitex Calcium
Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate
FDA approval
Approved as Kayexalate
Approved as Veltassa
Under review
Structure
Benzene, diethenyl-polymer, with ethenylbenzene, sulfonated, sodium salt, organic polymer
100-mm bead, organic polymer
Octahedral, micropore ring 3Å diameter, inorganic crystal
Mechanism of action
Binds Naþ, Kþ, Ca2þ, or Mg2 High selectivity for Caþ2 (68) Works mostly in colon (68)
Ca2+ loaded polymer and Ca2+-K+ exchanger Binds K+, Na+, Ca2+, or Mg2 Works mostly in colon (68)
Selectivity for Kþ Works in entire GI tract (68)
Administration
15-60 g, up to 4 times daily (85)
8.4 g once daily and can be advanced to 16.8 g to 25.2 g at weekly intervals (60)
5–15 g, once daily, oral (71)
Storage temperature
Room temperature (43)
2 C–8 C (60)
Room temperature (71)
Normalize serum Kþ
Variable and not known
48 to 72 h (60)
2.2 h (mean) (69)
Normokalemia maintained
Variable and not known
52 weeks (so far known) (61)
52 weeks (so far known) (79)
Efficacy
Safety Edema
Not known
None
1.3% (14 days) (69), 7.9% (28 days) (69)
Worsening of CKD
Not known
6.3% (over 52 weeks) (61)
Not known
Mild to moderate GI AE
Variable (53)
15% (52 weeks) (61)
5.3% (open-label phase) (69) 1.8% (maintenance phase) (69)
Severe GI AE
Colonic necrosis: case reports (43,86) None
None
Hypomagnesemia
Reported (85)
7.2%–24% (56,60,61)
None
Hypokalemia/increased QTc Reported (87)
3%–5.6% (61,63)
0%–11% (69), dose-dependent
Calcium
Reported hypercalcemia (85)
Possible hypocalcemia (88), rare
None
Phosphosphate
Not known
None to minimal (56,63)
None
AE ¼ adverse events; Ca2þ ¼ calcium ion; CKD ¼ chronic kidney disease; FDA ¼ Food and Drug Administration; GI ¼ gastrointestinal; Kþ ¼ potassium ion; Mg2þ ¼ magnesium ion; Naþ ¼ sodium ion; QTc ¼ QT interval corrected for heart rate.
promoting the development of resistance to already
PATIROMER
reduced RAASi-induced aldosterone levels (11,13). Many of the diseases that affect tubular function also
Patiromer, is a nonabsorbed polymer designed to
impair the release of renin and result in hypo-
bind potassium in the gastrointestinal tract and
reninemic hypoaldosteronism and impaired tubular
reduce serum potassium levels, which was recently
function (11).
approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
NEW TREATMENTS FOR HYPERKALEMIA
(FDA) (56). STRUCTURE
AND
MECHANISM
OF
ACTION.
Sodium polystyrene sulfonate has significant limita-
Patiromer (Figure 4) is synthesized as a 100- m m bead
tions for chronic use and has not been evaluated in
with optimized flow and viscosity properties and is
large randomized trials (48–50). Its use in HF is limited,
made in a high-yield 2-step process with polymeri-
as it may worsen edema by exchanging sodium for
zation followed by hydrolysis (57). Patiromer pre-
potassium ions (51). In addition, it is poorly tolerated
dominantly uses calcium as the exchange cation,
and associated with severe and even fatal gastroin-
instead of sodium (57). Patiromer is administered as
testinal complications (50,52). In a small single-center
once daily with food and promotes ionization of the
randomized controlled trial in 33 outpatients with CKD
polymeric potassium-binding moiety under pH con-
and mild hyperkalemia (5.0 to 5.9 mmol/l), a sodium
ditions present along the extent of the gastrointes-
polystyrene sulfonate dosage of 30 g orally once daily
tinal tract, predominantly in the colon (43). As a
for 7 days achieved normokalemia in 73% of the pa-
result of this structure, patiromer exchanges mono-
tients versus 38% of patients in the placebo group (53–
valent (sodium ion [Naþ]) and divalent (calcium ion
55). Patiromer (patiromersorbitex calcium/RLY5016;
[Ca2þ] and magnesium ion [Mg2þ]) cations through
Veltassa; Relypsa, Red Wood City, California) and so-
the length of the gastrointestinal tract and preferen-
dium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9) (AstraZeneca,
tially binds potassium in the colon, where the con-
Cheltenham, Pennsylvania) are 2 new and promising
centration of this cation is substantially higher than
potassium-lowering compounds (Table 2 and Central
that of Na þ, Ca2þ, or Mg2þ (58). The net effect is a
Illustration).
reduction in serum potassium under hypokalemic
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
C ENTR AL I LL U STRA T I O N Novel Agents for the Management of Hyperkalemia: Characteristics and Considerations
NEW TREATMENTS FOR HYPERKALEMIA: Patiromer (RLY5016) and Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9)
K
• Normalizes and maintains potassium levels
• Drug-drug interactions • Edema (at high doses of ZS-9)
• Reduces aldosterone levels and blood pressure
• Constipation, diarrhea, nausea • Hypomagnesemia • Hypokalemia
Evidence gaps: • Prevention of hyperkalemia • Limitation of RAASi optimization due to hypotension or worsening renal function RAASi in patients excluded from previous trials RAASi than used in previous trials Sarwar, C.M.S. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(14):1575–89.
This figure shows the advantages, concerns, and clinical scenarios that have been tested and those that need to be addressed with patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for the treatment of hyperkalemia in heart failure population. RAASi ¼ renin-angiotensin aldosterone system.
conditions in the colon, where increased potassium
followed by an 8-week randomized withdrawal
secretion through big potassium channels represents
phase, in which patients were randomly assigned to
an adaptive response to elevated serum potassium
continue the initial dose or were switched to placebo.
(59). Hypomagnesemia is reported in clinical trials of
Seventy-six percent of patients achieved normal po-
patiromer;
significant
tassium levels in 4 weeks. During the withdrawal
neuromuscular or cardiac abnormalities noted with
phase, the hyperkalemia incidence was 15% in the
treatment (56,60–62).
treatment arm and 60% in the placebo group. The
CLINICAL
however,
there
TRIALS WITH
were
no
PATIROMER
(RLY5016).
AMETHYST-DN (Patiromer in the Treatment of
Patiromer has been evaluated in 3 clinical trials
Hyperkalemia in Patients With Hypertension and
(Table 3).
Diabetic Nephropathy) study (61) was a multicenter,
E f fi c a c y . OPAL-HK (Study Evaluating the Efficacy
open-label, dose-ranging, randomized trial with a
and Safety of Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyper-
total of 306 patients with diabetes mellitus, CKD
kalemia) included 237 CKD patients with potassium
(eGFR: 15 to <60 ml/min/1.73 m2), and serum potas-
levels of 5.1 to 6.4 mmol/l, who were taking RAASi
sium level >5.0 mmol/l. All patients received RAASi
(60). There were 2 phases: a 4-week phase in which
before and during study treatment. Treatment with
patients received patiromer 4.2 g or 8.4 g twice a day,
patiromer in both the mild and the moderate
1581
1582
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
hypomagnesemia (8%), and hypokalemia (3%). Mag-
F I G U R E 4 Chemical Structure of Patiromer
nesium replacement therapy was initiated in 4% of subjects during the initial phase. In the withdrawal
Chemical structure of active ingredient
phase, constipation, diarrhea, and nausea (4% each) were the most common gastrointestinal events reported with patiromer, whereas these events
OH OH Calcium-sorbitol counterion
[Ca2+( HO
occurred in none of the patients with placebo (63). In OH )0.5]0.5
the PEARL-HF trail, the most common adverse events
OH OH -O
were gastrointestinal complaints (12%, n ¼ 21: flatuH2O
O
lence, diarrhea, constipation, or vomiting) (56).
* * F Patiromer anion
n
m
Hypokalemia is an important concern in HF (64).
p
When used as preventive measure for hyperkalemia, patiromer in PEARL-HF resulted in hypokalemia
*
(<3.5 mmol/l) in 6% of patients versus 0% of placebo n*
patients (p ¼ 0.094) (56). In addition, hypomagnese-
* p
*
mia (<1.8 mg/dl) was observed in 24% of the patients in the treatment group versus 2.1% in the placebo group. Adverse events resulting in patient with-
m = number of 2-fluoro-2-proprenoate groups n, p = number of crosslinking groups H2O = associated water *Indicates an extended polymeric network
m = 0.91 n + p = 0.09
drawal were similar in both groups (56). DRUG–DRUG
INTERACTION
WITH
PATIROMER.
Initial in vitro study data showed patiromer binding of >30% in 14 of 28 drugs tested, including 30% to 50%
From patiromer (Veltassa) prescribing information (Relypsa, Inc., Red Wood City, California). Ca ¼ calcium; F ¼ fluorine; O ¼ oxygen; OH ¼ hydroxide.
binding
to
clopidogrel,
furosemide,
metformin,
warfarin, metoprolol, verapamil, and lithium, whereas there was >50% binding to amlodipine, cinacalcet, ciprofloxacin, levothyroxine, quinidine, thiamine, and trimethoprim (65). In addition, a 30% reduction
hyperkalemia groups resulted in a reduction from baseline level at 4 weeks, which was maintained through 52 weeks. It is important to note that in both the OPAL-HK and the AMETHYST-DN trials, patients were able to maintain RAASi therapy. E f fi c a c y i n H F . A subgroup analysis of the OPAL-HK trial studied the effects of patiromer in HF patients (63). Of the 102 patients in the first 4 weeks, 76% achieved a serum potassium level of 3.8 mmol/l to 5.0 mmol/l. In the second withdrawal phase, hyperkalemia occurred in 52% (n ¼ 22) of patients taking placebo and 8% (n ¼ 27) of those taking patiromer (p < 0.001). The PEARL-HF (Evaluation of Patiromer in Heart Failure Patients) trial studied patiromer in patients with chronic HF (56). Patients either had eGFR <60 ml/min or a history of hyperkalemia resulting in discontinuation of a RAASi. A total of 155 patients were started on 25 mg/day of spironolactone and were randomized to double-blind treatment with 30 g/day of patiromer or placebo for 4 weeks. At 4 weeks, the
was seen in the availability of valsartan and rosiglitazone in preclinical coadministration studies in rats (56). Of 14 drugs tested initially for drug–drug interactions, 12 were tested in healthy volunteers (phase 1) in randomized, open-label studies, using a 3-way crossover design, according to FDA recommendations. The results released by the manufacturer showed no clinically meaningful reduction in absorption and no impact on peak concentration (Cmax) of lithium, trimethoprim, verapamil, and warfarin. There was also no clinically meaningful reduction in absorption, although there was some reduction in Cmax , of amlodipine, cinacalcet, clopidogrel, furosemide, and metoprolol and reduced absorption and C max of ciprofloxacin, levothyroxine, and metformin. Quinidine and thiamine were not tested (66). Meanwhile, the manufacturer, on the basis of in vitro studies, recommends taking these medications at least 6 h before or 6 h after patiromer, whereas the data from in vivo studies are being reviewed by the FDA (67).
patiromer treatment group had lowered potassium levels (7.3% vs. 24.5%, respectively; p ¼ 0.015) and was
SODIUM ZIRCONIUM CYCLOSILICATE
more likely to have spironolactone increased to 50 mg/day (91% vs. 74%, respectively; p ¼ 0.019).
Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9) is an inorganic,
S a f e t y a n d t o l e r a b i l i t y . The most common side
orally administered potassium-binding compound
effect in the initial phase of the OPAL-HK trial was
that has recently been investigated in phase II and III
constipation
clinical trials.
(11%),
followed
by
diarrhea
(8%),
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
1583
Hyperkalemia in HF
T A B L E 3 Clinical Trials With Patiromer
Trial, First Author, Year (Ref. #)
Type
Number of Patients
Intervention
Endpoints
Results
OPAL-HK Weir et al., 2015 (60)
RCT
237 CKD patients on RAASi with hyperkalemia þ (K 5.1–6.5 mmol/l)
Phase 1: 4–week initial treatment Change in median Kþ The mean Kþ level at baseline was 5.6 0.5 with 4.2 or 8.4 g twice daily levels in first 4 weeks mmol/l (5.3 0.6 mmol in patients with mild Phase 2: 8-week randomized of each phase hyperkalemia and 5.7 0.4 mmol in those withdrawal phase. Patients with moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia). þ who had decreased K to 3.8– At 4 weeks, mean SE change in Kþ levels from 5.1 mmol/l, received treatment baseline was 1.01 0.03 mmol/l (95% CI: vs. placebo 1.07 to 0.95; p < 0.001). The change in patients with mild hyperkalemia was 0.65 0.05 mmol/l (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.55), and the change in those with moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia was 1.23 0.04 mmol/l (95% CI: 1.31 to 1.16). In the withdrawal phase at week 8, 60% of patients in the placebo group had recurrence of hyperkalemia (Kþ >5.5 mmol/l) vs. 15% in the treatment group (p < 0.001). At the end of phase 2, 55% of HF patients on placebo and 100% of treatment group patients were receiving RAASi.
OPAL-HK (Substudy) Pitt et al., 2015 (63)
RCT
102 patients with CKD and HF
Change in median Kþ Phase 1 at 4 weeks: the mean SE change in serum Phase 1: 4-week treatment with levels in first 4 weeks Kþ from baseline was 1.06 0.05 mmol/l 4.2 or 8.4 g twice daily of each phase (95% CI: 1.16 to 0.95; p < 0.001). Phase 2: 8-week withdrawal phase In withdrawal phase at 8 weeks, 52% of patients in patients with Kþ to 3.8–5.1 mmol/l, received treatment vs. in the placebo group had a recurrence of placebo hyperkalemia (Kþ >5.5 mmol/l) vs. 8% in the treatment group (p < 0.001). At the end of phase 2, 55% of HF patients on placebo and 100% of treatment group patients were receiving RAASi.
PEARL-HF Pitt et al., 2011 (56)
RCT
105 HF patients on standard therapy and spironolactone
Patient randomized to 3 g/day of treatment vs. placebo for 4 weeks
Change in median Kþ levels at 4 weeks
Treatment group normalized Kþ in 24 % (12 of 49 patients) vs. 7% (4 of 55 patients) in placebo (p ¼ 0.015) 91% in the treatment group were able to reach the target dosage of spironolactone (50 mg/day at 4 weeks, increased from 25 mg/day). A greater number of patients in the treatment group were able to have their spironolactone dose increased vs. the placebo group (91% vs. 74%; p ¼ 0.019).
AMETHYST-DN Bakris et al., 2015 (61)
RCT
306 diabetic patients on RAASi with Kþ >5.0 mmol/l
Varying patiromer twice-daily dosing in: 1. Mild hyperkalemia group, dose of 4.2, 8.4, or 12.6 g 2. Moderate hyperkalemia group, dose of 8.4, 12.6, or 16.8 g Dose titrated to keep Kþ <5.0 mmol/l
Change in median Kþ levels at 4 weeks or before dose titration. Adverse events up to 52 weeks
1. Mild hyperkalemia group: Kþ at 4 weeks was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.22–0.48) mmol/l for the 4.2-g twice-daily starting-dosage group, 0.51 (95% CI: 0.38–0.64) mmol/l for the 8.4-g twice-daily starting-dosage group, and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.42–0.68) mmol/l for the 12.6 g twice-daily starting-dosage group. 2. Moderate hyperkalemia group: Kþ reduction at 4 weeks was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.60–1.14) mmol/l for the 8.4 g twice-daily starting-dosage group, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.70–1.23) mmol/l for the 12.6 g twice-daily starting-dosage group, and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.67–1.17) mmol/l for the 16.8 g twice-daily starting-dosage group (p < 0.001 for all groups). This effect was maintained through week 52, where mean daily patiromer dosages were similar to those at week 4 through week 8 (19.4 g/day vs. 27.2 g/day) in patients with mild vs. moderate hyperkalemia, respectively. Adverse events: hypomagnesemia (8.6%), mild to moderate constipation, and hypokalemia (<3.5 mmol/l) occurred in 5.6% of patients.
AMETHYST-DN ¼ Patiromer in the Treatment of Hyperkalemia in Patients With Hypertension and Diabetic Nephropathy; CI ¼ confidence interval; HF ¼ heart failure; OPAL-HK ¼ Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia; PEARL-HF ¼ Evaluation of Patiromer in Heart Failure Patients; RAASi ¼ angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; RCT ¼ randomized controlled trial; other abbreviations as in Table 1.
STRUCTURE AND MECHANISM OF ACTION. ZS-9 is
physiological potassium channels and selectively
administered as a once-daily dose, and its physio-
captures potassium cations. This is accomplished by
logical ion channels filter ions on the basis of their
the use of a selectivity filter (62). In order to pass
differing diameters. ZS-9 has a structure that mimics
through the channel, an ion must shed its hydration
1584
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
F I G U R E 5 ZS-9 Pore Detail
The ZS-9 pore is shown with a potassium ion (A), a sodium ion (B), and a calcium ion (C). The specificity for potassium is likely due to the size and binding sites of the pores. Adapted with permission from Stavros et al. (68). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 4.
sphere and only then can it interact with the carbonyl
shedding its water coat has a diameter of 1.44 A (72).
oxygens in the channel. Both sodium and potassium
This diameter is energetically unfavorable for Mg þ2 to
are of the size that would fit in the ZS-9 structure ring,
interact with the oxygen bonds in the ZS-9 structural
but after shedding their hydration shells, only K þ has
ring (68).
a size sufficient to fit into the ZS-9 pore size (68) CLINICAL TRIALS WITH ZS-9. Sodium zirconium
(Figure 5). ZS-9 is not absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract
cyclosilicate has been evaluated in 4 clinical trials
and is available as insoluble, free-floating, odorless,
(Table 4).
tasteless, white crystalline powder. It is an inorganic
E f fi c a c y . The effect of ZS-9 over 14 days, including at
compound, unlike sodium polystyrene sulfonate, and
the 48-h acute phase was demonstrated in the ZS-003
specifically
and
trial (71). Overall, 753 patients with potassium levels
ammonium) over divalent cations (like Ca 2þ or Mg 2þ).
between 5.0 and 6.4 mmol/l were given various doses
Because it is not systemically absorbed, the risk of
of ZS-9, and the exponential rate of change in serum
systemic toxicity is low (69–71). The potassium ex-
potassium levels at 48 h was measured. A dose-
change capacity of ZS-9 was studied using a simulated
related reduction in potassium levels was observed.
gastrointestinal tract medium with various concen-
A similar short-term phase II study by Ash et al. (70),
trations of ZS-9 doses and medium pH (68). It was
using lower various doses of ZS-9 provided favorable
observed that in the simulated gastric fluid (pH w1.2),
results with significant reductions in potassium
there is an initial drop in potassium concentration,
levels, even at lower doses, with only mild con-
which reverses soon afterward. In the small intestine
stipation reported (70).
traps
monovalent
(potassium
(pH w4.5), there is an immediate uptake of potas-
The
HARMONIZE
(Hyperkalemia
Randomized
sium, followed by a small release, with equilibrium
Intervention Multi-Dose ZS-9 Maintenance Another)
reached in approximately 20 min. In the large intes-
trial (69) enrolled ambulatory patients with hyper-
tine (pH 6.8), there is a rapid uptake of potassium
kalemia (>5.1 mmol/l). In the first 48 h, the patients
during the first 10 min, followed by continued but
(n ¼ 258) received 10 g of ZS-9 3 times a day, which
slower uptake over the next hour with no further in-
resulted in lowering of potassium levels from 5.6
crease thereafter. It was also observed that the bind-
mmol/l to 4.5 mmol/l. The median time to normali-
ing capacity of ZS-9 increased proportionately with
zation was 2.2 h. At 24 h, 84% of patients were nor-
increasing concentration >0.5 to 50 mg/ml. These
mokalemic, and by 48 h, 98% were normokalemic.
results led to the conclusion that, in environments
This was followed by the maintenance phase, in
mimicking the human gastrointestinal tract and in
which patients who achieved normokalemia were
the presence of ZS-9, potassium equilibrium was
randomized to receive ZS-9, 5 g (n ¼ 45), 10 g (n ¼ 51), or
reached relatively quickly (<20 min) (68). Mg2þ after
15 g (n ¼ 56), or placebo (n ¼ 85) daily for 28 days.
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
1585
Hyperkalemia in HF
T A B L E 4 Clinical Trials With Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate
Trial, First Author, Year (Ref #)
Type of Study
Number of Patients (n)
Intervention
Endpoints
Results
ZS-003 Packham et al., 2015 (71)
RCT Double-blinded Phase III
Potassium levels Reduction of 0.46, 0.54, and 0.73 in the 2.5-, 5-, Patients were randomly 753 patients with Kþ through 48 h and 10-g groups, respectively, and 0.25 mmol/l assigned to thrice-daily: 5.0-6.5 mmol/l with placebo. At 1 h, a significant reduction was 1. ZS-9 treatment with 1.25, 561 patients had seen after the 10-g dose (-0.11 vs. þ0.01 mmol/l 2.5, 5.0, or 10 g or eGFR <60 ml/min/ 2 in placebo; p ¼ 0.009). At 48 h, 99% of patients 1.73 m , 502 patients 2. placebo for 48 h. þ treated with 10 g t.i.d. and 94% with 5 g t.i.d. had diabetes, and 300 Patients with K 3.5–4.9 mmol/l at 48 h were achieved normal Kþ. In the maintenance phase, patients had history the patients who received 5 g and 10 g ZS-9, randomly assigned to of HF serum Kþ levels were maintained at 4.76 mmol/l once-daily ZS-9 or and 4.58 mmol/l, respectively, compared with placebo on days 3–14. >5.10 mmol/l in the placebo group (p < 0.01) after ZS-9 withdrawal. Adverse events: Initial phase (ZS-9 group 12.9% and placebo group 10.8%). Maintenance phase (ZS-9 group 25.1% and placebo group 24.5%).
ZS-002 Ash et al., 2015 (70)
RCT Double-blinded Phase II
90 patients with Kþ 5.0-6.5 mmol/l
Potassium levels Mean baseline serum Kþ was 5.1 mmol/l. Serum Kþ Patients were randomly assigned to thrice-daily: through 48 h was significantly decreased by 0.92 1. ZS-9 treatment with 0.3 0.52 mmol/l at 38 h. Urinary potassium excretion (n ¼ 12), 3.0 (n ¼ 24) or significantly decreased with 10-g ZS-9 as 10 g (n ¼ 24) or compared with placebo at day 2 (þ15.8 21.8 2. Placebo (n ¼ 30) for 48 h mmol/l/24 h vs. þ8.9 22.9 mmol/l/24 h). Mild GI adverse events in 20% patients in treatment group vs. 10% in placebo group. Only 90 patients in study.
258 patients with Kþ >5.0 mmol/l
All patients treated with Potassium levels thrice-daily 10 g ZS-9 through 8 to for 48 h. Patients with 29 days in normokalemia (3.5–5.0 each group mmol/l) at 48 h were randomly assigned to receive once-daily 5, 10, or 15 g of ZS-9 or placebo for 28 days
In the open-label phase, mean Kþ levels decreased from 5.6 to 4.5 mmol/l at 48 h. Median time to normalization was 2.2 h, 84% achieved normokalemia by 24 h and 98% by 48 h. In the randomized phase, Kþ level declined though days 8-29 with all ZS-9 doses vs. placebo (4.8 mmol/l, 4.5 mmol/l, and 4.4 mmol/l for 5 g, 10 g, and 15 g, respectively; 5.1 mmol/l for placebo. The proportion of patients with mean Kþ <5.1 mmol/l during days 8-29 was higher in all treatment groups vs. placebo (80%, 90%, and 94% for the 5-, 10-, and 15-g groups, respectively, vs. 46% with placebo. Edema was more common in the ZS-9, 15-g group (2%, 2%, 6%, and 14% in placebo, 5-g, 10-g, and 15-g groups, respectively). Hypokalemia developed in 10% and 11% in the 10-g and 15-g treatment groups, respectively, vs. none in the 5-g or placebo group.
94 patients with Kþ >5.0 mmol/l; 60 receiving RAASi
All patients treated with thrice-daily 10 g ZS-9 for 48 h. Patients with normokalemia (3.5–5.0 mmol/l) at 48 h were randomly assigned to receive once-daily 5 g, 10 g, or 15 g of ZS-9 or placebo for 28 days
87 (93%) achieved normokalemia after 48 h. In the randomized phase, despite constant RAASi doses, Kþ level declined though days 8-29 with all ZS-9 doses vs. placebo (4.7 mmol/l, 4.5 mmol/l, and 4.4 mmol/l for 5 g, 10 g, and 15 g, respectively; 5.2 mmol/l for placebo. The proportion of patients with mean Kþ <5.1 mmol/l during days 8-29 was higher in all treatment groups vs. placebo (83%, 89%, and 92% for the 5-g, 10-g, and 15-g dose groups, respectively, vs. 40% with placebo. Edema was more common in the maintenance phase, occurring in 1, 2, and 5 patients in the 5-g, 10-g, and 15-g dose groups, respectively, vs. 1 patient in the placebo group.
ZS-004 or HARMONIZE RCT Kosiborod et al., Double-blinded 2014 (69) Phase III
HARMONIZE HF subgroup Anker et al., 2015 (73)
Double-blinded Phase III
Potassium levels through 8 to 29 days in each group
eGFR ¼ estimated glomerular filtration rate; HARMONIZE ¼ Hyperkalemia Randomized Intervention Multi-Dose ZS-9 Maintenance Another; t.i.d. ¼ 3 times a day; ZS-9 ¼ sodium zirconium cyclosilicate; other abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2.
Maintenance of normokalemia was observed with
E f fi c a c y i n H F . The effect of ZS-9 on the subgroup
once-daily doses of ZS-9 at 5, 10, and 15 g, with serum
population of HF patients (n ¼ 94) from the
potassium levels of 4.8, 4.5, and 4.4 mmol/l, respec-
HARMONIZE trial showed that all 3 doses of ZS-9 were
tively, versus placebo (5.1 mmol/l). It was also demon-
effective in lowering and maintaining normal potas-
strated that patients with higher baseline potassium
sium levels, including those taking RAASi therapy
levels experienced greater absolute reductions.
with similar safety profiles (73) (Table 4).
1586
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
S a f e t y a n d t o l e r a b i l i t y . In the ZS-003 trial, the
hypertension in 7% (48 of 684) patients (79). More
rates of adverse events were similar to those in the
prospective data are needed to further explore the
ZS-9 group (12.9%) and the placebo groups (10.8%),
effect of patiromer on blood pressure.
with diarrhea being the most common complication in both groups (1.7% in ZS-9 vs. 2.2% in placebo). In HARMONIZE, adverse events occurred in 53%, 29%, and 44% of patients receiving ZS-9 doses of 5, 10, and 15 g, respectively, compared with 32% in patients who received placebo. Edema was more common in the 15-g group. Gastrointestinal side effects were similar to those in the placebo group (14% placebo vs. 7%, 2%, and 9% for the 5-, 10-, and 15-g groups, respectively) (70).
EFFECT ON ALDOSTERONE Renal hypoperfusion in HF activates the RAAS, which increases norepinephrine and angiotensin II, causing vasoconstriction and release of aldosterone through alpha-adrenergic and angiotensin II type 1 receptors (74). RAAS stimulation contributes to salt and water retention, renal potassium excretion, and activation of the sympathetic nervous system (75). RAASi inhibit aldosterone, resulting in decreased potassium excretion (11,76). Weir et al. (77) analyzed the effect of
CHRONIC USE FOR PREVENTION OF HYPERKALEMIA The treatment of acute hyperkalemia is well recognized. It is equally important to develop treatments for chronic use by both previously hyperkalemic patients and those who are at risk of developing hyperkalemia. The utility of this approach will require long-term data for the safety of these compounds, as well as the efficacy of such an approach to optimize RAASi use. This will require both clinical outcomes and quality-of-life data comparing patients’ willingness to continue the therapy versus using other approaches, such as dietary potassium restrictions in patients who are already on a lowcarbohydrate and low-salt diet. Also, in case of noncompliance and abrupt discontinuation of therapy by patients, the risk of rebound hyperkalemia in patients optimized to RAASi therapy in HF needs to be studied.
ONGOING TRIALS FOR PATIROMER AND ZS-9
patiromer on serum aldosterone levels in patients with CKD in the OPAL-HK trial. A reduction in plasma
The TOURMALINE (Patiromer With or Without Food
aldosterone levels and in the urine aldosterone-to-
for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia) study is an
creatinine ratio at 4 and 8 weeks of patiromer use
ongoing trial to determine patiromer’s efficacy and
was observed. Similarly, a reduction in systolic (SBP)
safety when used once daily with or without food,
and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure and in the urinary
focusing more on African American and Hispanic pa-
albumin to creatinine ratio was also observed. Data
tients (NCT02694744) (80). ZS-9 has an ongoing trial
from HARMONIZE showed a 30% reduction in serum
(ZS-005) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 10 g
aldosterone with ZS9 after 28 days of treatment. It is
3 times a day for 24 to 72 h, followed by a long-term
important to study the clinical relevance of this
maintenance phase once daily for up to 12 months
finding.
(NCT02163499) (81).
EFFECT ON BLOOD PRESSURE
FUTURE DIRECTION
Treating hyperkalemia with patiromer, in addition to
According to HF guidelines, MRAs should not be used
maintenance of RAASi therapy, may improve blood
in patients with eGFR <30 ml/min or serum potas-
pressure control. A subgroup analysis from the
sium levels >5.0 mmol/l (5,6). This leads to the
AMETHYST-DN trial in a cohort of 79 of 306 patients
exclusion of a significant group of HF patients (18% to
with diabetic kidney disease and resistant hyperten-
40%) with reduced ejection fraction who are not
sion (defined as systolic blood pressure [SBP] >140
prescribed MRAs (82,83). Similarly, the use of ACEi or
mm Hg in 4 or more classes of antihypertensive
ARBs is seen only in 55% to 63 % of patients with CKD
drugs), who were treated with patiromer for hyper-
in primary care; however, there is a lack of published
kalemia and continued with RAASi therapy, showed
data quantifying the role of hyperkalemia that results
decreases in SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
in lack of use of RAASi in this population (84).
of 18 17 mm Hg and 9.0 13 mm Hg, respec-
It is evident that there is a need for better therapies
tively, at the end of 52 weeks of therapy (78). The
for
interim analysis of the 711 patients enrolled in
shown by patiromer and ZS-9 may have a favorable
hyperkalemia. The promising
initial results
an ongoing ZS-9 study (ZS005) to evaluate the long-
impact on this paradigm. Although both compounds
term (52-week) efficacy and safety of ZS-9 showed
have demonstrated positive short- and longer-term
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
efficacy and tolerability, the long-term optimization of RAASi with the use of potassium binders needs to
not known. Additionally, in this high-risk group, the efficacy of novel binders may be different.
be evaluated. In addition, further data for their safety
3. Assessing higher doses of RAASi than previously
also need to be considered. This will also provide the
used, for example, a high dose in the setting of
opportunity to study those groups of patients who
acute HF.
were excluded from clinical trials due to hyperkalemia. Although subgroup analysis of HF patients supported the ability of these agents to continue RAASi use in HF, further studies of up-titration to optimal dosing of RAASi in HF are needed (73). On the basis of these evidence gaps, there are 3 proposed areas for future research, as follows:
No trials are ongoing to assess the highlighted gaps in evidence in order to optimize long-term management of HF patients. It also needs to be determined whether these evidence gaps would require largescale morbidity and mortality trials or whether only short-term safety and tolerability trials would suffice by implicitly accepting the fact that if the newer
1. Prevention of hyperkalemia and the ability to
potassium-lowering agents reduced hyperkalemia,
optimize RAASi. We don’t know if this is possible,
then use of RAASi would improve outcomes in pop-
even if hyperkalemia is prevented, as patients may
ulations where they have not been tested specifically.
still be intolerant on the basis of hypotension or REPRINT REQUESTS AND CORRESPONDENCE: Dr.
worsening renal function. 2. Broadening the use of RAASi to patients with eGFR
Javed Butler, Cardiology Division, Stony Brook Uni-
<30 ml/min, who have generally been excluded
versity Health Sciences Center, T-16, Room 080,
from previous trials. These patients may benefit
SUNY at Stony Brook, New York 11794. E-mail: javed.
more from RAASi due to their higher risk, but it is
[email protected].
REFERENCES 1. An JN, Lee JP, Jeon HJ, et al. Severe hyperkalemia requiring hospitalization: predictors of mortality. Crit Care 2012;16:R225. 2. Khanagavi J, Gupta T, Aronow WS, et al. Hyperkalemia among hospitalized patients and association between duration of hyperkalemia and outcomes. Arch Med Sci 2014;10:251–7. 3. Acker CG, Johnson JP, Palevsky PM, et al. Hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients: causes, adequacy of treatment, and results of an attempt to improve physician compliance with published therapy guidelines. Arch Intern Med 1998;158: 917–24. 4. Jain N, Kotla S, Little BB, et al. Predictors of hyperkalemia and death in patients with cardiac and renal disease. Am J Cardiol 2012;109:1510–3. 5. McMurray JJV, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, et al., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:803–69. 6. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:e147–239. 7. Khan SS, Campia U, Chioncel O, et al., EVEREST Trial Investigators. Changes in serum potassium levels during hospitalization in patients with worsening heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (from the EVEREST trial). Am J Cardiol 2015;115:790–6. 8. Juurlink DN, Mamdani MM, Lee DS, et al. Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the
Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study. N Engl J Med 2004;351:543–51. 9. Rabelink TJ, Koomans HA, Hené RJ, et al. Early and late adjustment to potassium loading in humans. Kidney Int 1990;38:942–7. 10. Gumz ML, Rabinowitz L, Wingo CS. An integrated view of potassium homeostasis. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1787–8. 11. Palmer BF. Managing hyperkalemia caused by inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. N Engl J Med 2004;351:585–92. 12. Greenlee M, Wingo CS, McDonough AA, et al. Narrative review: evolving concepts in potassium homeostasis and hypokalemia. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:619–25 [erratum: Ann Intern Med 2009;151:143–4]. 13. Young DB, Smith MJ Jr., Jackson TE, et al. Multiplicative interaction between angiotensin II and K concentration in stimulation of aldosterone. Am J Physiol 1984;247:E328–35. 14. Shier DN, Kusano E, Stoner GD, et al. Production of renin, angiotensin II, and aldosterone by adrenal explant cultures: response to potassium and converting enzyme inhibition. Endocrinology 1989;125:486–91. 15. Pratt JH, Rothrock JK, Dominguez JH. Evidence that angiotensin-II and potassium collaborate to increase cytosolic calcium and stimulate the secretion of aldosterone. Endocrinology 1989; 125:2463–9. 16. Oh YT, Kim J, Youn JH. Role of pituitary in Kþ homeostasis: impaired renal responses to altered Kþ intake in hypophysectomized rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2013;304: R1166–74.
17. Oh KS, Oh YT, Kim SW, et al. Gut sensing of dietary Kþ intake increases renal Kþ excretion. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2011;301: R421–9. 18. Preston RA, Afshartous D, Rodco R, et al. Evidence for a gastrointestinal-renal kaliuretic signaling axis in humans. Kidney Int 2015;88: 1383–91. 19. Ponikowski P, Anker SD, Al Habib KF, et al. Heart failure: preventing disease and death worldwide. ESC Heart Fail 2014;1:4–25. 20. Packham DK, Kosiborod M. Potential new agents for the management of hyperkalemia. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2016;16:19–31. 21. Bramlage P, Swift S, Thoenes M, et al. Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism for the treatment of cardiovascular and renal disease. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:28–37. 22. Aaron KJ, Sanders PW. Role of dietary salt and potassium intake in cardiovascular health and disease: a review of the evidence. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88:987–95. 23. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1296–305. 24. Vardeny O, Wu DH, Desai A, et al., RALES Investigators. Influence of baseline and worsening renal function on efficacy of spironolactone in patients with severe heart failure: insights from RALES (Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2082–9. 25. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the
1587
1588
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1495–539. 26. Nakao N, Yoshimura A, Morita H, et al. Combination treatment of angiotensin-II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in non-diabetic renal disease (COOPERATE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:117–24 [erratum: Lancet 2003;36:1230; retraction: Lancet 2009;374:1226]. 27. Cohn JN, Tognoni G. Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1667–75. 28. McMurray JJV, Östergren J, Swedberg K, et al., CHARM Investigators and Committees. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart
dysfunction: common sense or nonsense? Circ Heart Fail 2014;7:537–40. 38. Packer M, Poole-Wilson PA, Armstrong PW, et al. Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. Circulation 1999;100:2312–8. 39. Konstam MA, Neaton JD, Dickstein K, et al., HEAAL Investigators. Effects of high-dose versus low-dose losartan on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HEAAL study): a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2009;374:1840–8. 40. HCUP Databases. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2011. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/ databases.jsp. Accessed July 20, 2016.
failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet 2003; 362:767–71.
41. Weisberg LS. Management of severe hyperkalemia. Crit Care Med 2008;36:3246–51.
29. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJV, Velazquez EJ, et al., Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure,
J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:3217–32.
left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1893–906.
42. Wilmer WA, Rovin BH, Hebert CJ, et al. Management of glomerular proteinuria: a commentary.
43. Sterns RH, Rojas M, Bernstein P, et al. Ionexchange resins for the treatment of hyperkalemia: are they safe and effective? J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21:733–5.
30. Ahuja TS, Freeman D Jr., Mahnken JD, et al. Predictors of the development of hyperkalemia in patients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Am J Nephrol 2000;20:268–72.
44. Schwinger RH, Erdmann E. Heart failure and electrolyte disturbances. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1992;14:315–25.
31. Reardon LC, Macpherson DS. Hyperkalemia in outpatients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. How much should we worry? Arch Intern Med 1998;158:26–32.
renin-angiotensin system in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:28E–32E; discussion: 52E.
45. Dargie HJ. Interrelation of electrolytes and
32. McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al., PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees.
46. Takaichi K, Takemoto F, Ubara Y, et al. Analysis of factors causing hyperkalemia. Intern Med 2007;46:823–9.
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014;371:993–1004.
47. Lazich I, Bakris GL. Prediction and management of hyperkalemia across the spectrum of
33. Michel A, Martin-Pérez M, Ruigómez A, et al. Risk factors for hyperkalaemia in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure: a nested case-control study in UK general practice. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:205–13.
chronic kidney disease. Sem Nephrol 2014;34: 333–9.
34. Vardeny O, Claggett B, Anand I, et al., Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) Investigators. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes related to hypo- and hyperkalemia in patients with severe heart failure treated with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Circ Heart Fail 2014;7: 573–9. 35. Adams KF Jr., Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, et al., ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J 2005;149:209–16. 36. Luo J, Brunelli SM, Jensen DE, et al. Association between serum potassium and outcomes in patients with reduced kidney function. Clin J Am
48. Kessler C, Ng J, Valdez K, et al. The use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the inpatient management of hyperkalemia. J Hosp Med 2011;6: 136–40. 49. Harel Z, Harel S, Shah PS, et al. Gastrointestinal adverse events with sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Kayexalate) use: a systematic review. Am J Med 2013;126:264.e9–24. 50. Yuan CM, Nee R, Little DJ, et al. Incidence of sodium polystyrene sulfonate-associated colonic necrosis. Am J Med 2013;126:e13. 51. Nepal M, Bucaloiu ID, Norfolk ER. Hypernatremia in a patient treated with sodium polystyrene sulfonate. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2010;3:141–3. 52. Watson MA, Baker TP, Nguyen A, et al. Association of prescription of oral sodium polystyrene sulfonate with sorbitol in an inpatient setting with colonic necrosis: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;60:409–16.
54. Packer M, McMurray JJV, Desai AS, et al., PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Coordinators. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition compared with enalapril on the risk of clinical progression in surviving patients with heart failure. Circulation 2015;131:54–61. 55. López-Vilella R, Morillas-Climent H, PlazaLópez D, et al. Hyperkalemia in heart failure patients: current challenges and future prospects. Res Rep Clin Cardiol 2016;2016:1–8. 56. Pitt B, Anker SD, Bushinsky DA, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of RLY5016, a polymeric potassium binder, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic heart failure (the PEARL-HF) trial. Eur Heart J 2011;32:820–8. 57. Li L, Harrison SD, Cope MJ, et al. Mechanism of action and pharmacology of patiromer, a nonabsorbed cross-linked polymer that lowers serum potassium concentration in patients with hyperkalemia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2016;21: 456–65. 58. Fordtran JS, Locklear TW. Ionic constituents and osmolality of gastric and small-intestinal fluids after eating. Am J Digestive Diseases 1966; 11:503–21. 59. Sorensen MV, Matos JE, Praetorius HA, et al. Colonic potassium handling. Pflugers Arch 2010; 459:645–56. 60. Weir MR, Bakris GL, Bushinsky DA, et al., OPAL-HK Investigators. Patiromer in patients with kidney disease and hyperkalemia receiving RAAS inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2015;372:211–21. 61. Bakris GL, Pitt B, Weir MR, et al., AMETHYSTDN Investigators. Effect of patiromer on serum potassium level in patients with hyperkalemia and diabetic kidney disease: the AMETHYST-DN randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:151–61. 62. Fulton TB. Diffusion and transport across cell membranes [lecture]. Available at: http:// biochemistry2.ucsf.edu/programs/ptf/prologue% 20links/Diff%20&%20Trans%20Membranes.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2016. 63. Pitt B, Bakris GL, Bushinsky DA, et al. Effect of patiromer on reducing serum potassium and preventing recurrent hyperkalaemia in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease on RAAS inhibitors. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:1057–65. 64. Bowling CB, Pitt B, Ahmed MI, et al. Hypokalemia and outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease: findings from propensity-matched studies. Circ Heart Fail 2010;3:253–60. 65. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Application number: 205739Orig1s000. Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation Review(s). Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration. 2015. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/ drugsatfda_docs/nda/2015/205739Orig1s000RiskR. pdf. Accessed July 20, 2016.
37. Butler J, Givertz MM. Response to Sexton:
53. Lepage L, Dufour AC, Doiron J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of sodium polystyrene sul-
66. Relypsa Announces Results From Veltassa Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Healthy Volunteers. Redwood City, CA: Relypsa, Inc.; 2016. Avail-
Inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with heart failure and renal
fonate for the treatment of mild hyperkalemia in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;10:2136–42.
able at: http://investor.relypsa.com/releasedetail. cfm?releaseid¼951581. Accessed July 20, 2016.
Soc Nephrol 2016;11:90–100.
Sarwar et al.
JACC VOL. 68, NO. 14, 2016 OCTOBER 4, 2016:1575–89
Hyperkalemia in HF
67. Veltassa (patiromer) for oral suspension [prescribing information]. Redwood City, CA: Relypsa, Inc., 2016. Available at, https://www.veltassa. com/pi.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2016.
76. Urso C, Brucculeri S, Caimi G. Acid-base and electrolyte abnormalities in heart failure: pathophysiology and implications. Heart Fail Rev 2015; 20:493–503.
68. Stavros F, Yang A, Leon A, et al. Characterization of structure and function of ZS-9, a Kþ selective ion trap. PloS One 2014;9:e114686.
77. Weir M, Bakris G, Gross C, et al. Abstract P602: Patiromer decreased aldosterone, urine albumin/ creatinine ratio, and blood pressure in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperkalemia on RAAS inhibitors: results from OPAL-HK [abstract]. Hypertension 2015;66:AP602.
69. Kosiborod M, Rasmussen HS, Lavin P, et al. Effect of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate on potassium lowering for 28 days among outpatients with hyperkalemia: the HARMONIZE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;312:2223–33. 70. Ash SR, Singh B, Lavin PT, et al. A phase 2 study on the treatment of hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease suggests that the selective potassium trap, ZS-9, is safe and efficient. Kidney Int 2015;88:404–11. 71. Packham DK, Rasmussen HS, Lavin PT, et al. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in hyperkalemia. N Engl J Med 2015;372:222–31. 72. Paula S, Volkov AG, Van Hoek AN, et al. Permeation of protons, potassium ions, and small polar molecules through phospholipid bilayers as a function of membrane thickness. Biophys J 1996; 70:339–48. 73. Anker SD, Kosiborod M, Zannad F, et al. Maintenance of serum potassium with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9) in heart failure patients: results from a phase 3 randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:1050–6. 74. Holtz J. Pathophysiology of heart failure and the renin-angiotensin-system. Basic Res Cardiol 1993;88 Suppl 1:183–201. 75. Sobotka PA, Krum H, Böhm M, et al. The role of renal denervation in the treatment of heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rep 2012;14:285–92.
78. Epstein M, Mayo M, Garza D, et al. Strategy for improved blood pressure (BP) control in resistant hypertension (RH) with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Paper presented at: National Kidney Foundation Meeting; May 1, 2016; Boston, MA. 79. Tumlin, JA, Kosiborod M, Pergola PE, et al. SAPO1101: Long-term (52-week) efficacy and safety of ZS-9 in the treatment of hyperkalemia: interim results from a phase 3 open-label, multicenter, multi-dose maintenance study. Paper presented at: Kidney Week; November 7, 2015; San Diego, CA. 80. Relypsa, Inc. Patiromer With or Without Food for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia (TOURMALINE). 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02694744. Accessed July 20, 2016. 81. ZS Pharma, Inc. Open-label Safety and Efficacy of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate for up to 12 Months. 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02163499. Accessed July 20, 2016.
83. Maggioni AP, Anker SD, Dahlström U, et al., Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA). Are hospitalized or ambulatory patients with heart failure treated in accordance with European Society of Cardiology guidelines? Evidence from 12,440 patients of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2013;15: 1173–84. 84. Mold JW, Aspy CB, Smith PD, et al. Leveraging practice-based research networks to accelerate implementation and diffusion of chronic kidney disease guidelines in primary care practices: a prospective cohort study. Implement Sci 2014;9:169. 85. Bashour TT, Fahdul H, Cheng TO. Complete heart block with normal QRS duration occurring distal to the His bundle in acute inferior myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 1975;8: 185–90. 86. Watson M, Abbott KC, Yuan CM. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: potassium binding resins in hyperkalemia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:1723–6. 87. Einbinder Y, Korzets Z, Goodman DJ, et al. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate—is it truly effective treatment for hyperkalemia? Clin Nephrol 2015; 83:71–2. 88. Allon M, Shanklin N. Effect of bicarbonate administration on plasma potassium in dialysis patients: interactions with insulin and albuterol. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;28:508–14.
82. Tebbe U, Tschöpe C, Wirtz JH, et al. Registry in Germany focusing on level-specific and evidence-
KEY WORDS angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor
based decision finding in the treatment of heart failure: REFLECT-HF. Clin Res Cardiol 2014;103: 665–73.
blockers, chronic kidney disease, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, patiromer, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
1589