Vol.
186,
No.
July
31, 1992
2, 1992
BlOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Pages 91 l-91 7
IDENTIFICATION
OF OSTEOPONTIN
IN ISOLATED
RABBIT
OSTEOCLASTS* Ken-ichi Tezukat , Takuya Sate’, Hiroshi Kamiokas, Peter J. Nijweide4, Kayo Tanaka’, Tetsu Matsuos, Mitsue Ohtas, Noriyoshi Kuriharaz, Yoshiyuki Hakedat , and Masayoshi Kumegawal Departments
of ‘Oral Anatomy and 2Periodontology, Meikai University of Dentistry, Sakado 350-02, Japan
sDepartment “Department sHikone
School of Dentistry,
of Cell Biology and Histology, Medical Faculty, University Leiden, Leiden, 2333 AA, The Netherlands
Research
sBio-organics
Received
of Orthodontics, Tokushima University Tokushima 770, Japan
School
Laboratories,
Research CIBA-GEIGY
June
10,
of
Maruho Co. Ltd., Hikone 522-02, Japan
Department, International (Japan) Ltd., Takarazuka
Research Laboratories, 665, Japan
1992
Summarv Bone remodeling is a complex process coupling bone formation and resorption. Osteoblasts, the bone-forming cells, are known to produce various bone matrix proteins and cytokines; however, little is known about protein factors produced by osteoclasts or bone-resorbing cells. A method utilizing the high affinity of osteoclasts for tissue culture dishes was developed to isolate a large number of pure osteoclasts from rabbit long bones. A cDNA library was then constructed from these isolated osteoclasts, and differential cDNA screening was performed between osteoclasts and spleen cells. Two clones representing osteoclast-specific clones, named OC-1 and OC-2, were isolated. By Northern blot analysis, OC-I was expressed in osteoclasts and in kidneys, whereas OC-2 was specific for osteoclasts. OC-1 was found to encode osteopontin from its nucleotide sequence, and therefore, osteopontin may have other functions for osteoclastic bone resorption besides osteoclast attachment to bone. 0 1992Academic Press,Inc. Osteoclasts are multinucleate giant cells derived from hematopoietic stem cells(l), and playing key roles in bone resorption. However, because of difficulty
of purification
information
of osteoclasts
from bone tissues, only limited
on them has been forthcoming
by mainly histological
and
cytochemical analyses. * Sequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBUGenBank Data Libraries under Accesion No. D11411. Abbreviations : TRAcP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; FBS, fetal bovine serum; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; kb, ki:obase pairs. 0006-291X/92
911
All
Copwight 0 199-7 rights of reproductiort
$4.00
by Academic Press. Inc. in an! form reserved.
Vol.
186,
No.
2, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BiOPHYSlCAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Up to now, limited number of proteins have been identified in osteoclasts. TRAcP, calcitonin receptor, and vitronectin receptor are used as markers of osteoclasts(2-4). osteoclasts(5), and cathepsin osteoclasts(6). performed
However, with isolated
other unidentified
Cathepsin L activity is also D is immunohistochemically
molecular osteoclasts,
proteins
biological
approach
and, therefore,
are produced
detected localized
has never
it is very possible
by osteoclasts
in in been that
and playing important
roles in bone resorption. Intending developed
osteoclasts
at the gene expression
a method to isolate a pure population
of Chambers isolation
to characterize
and Magnus(7),
of osteoclast-specific
and constructed cDNA
clones
library against spleen cells, and characterization
Materials
of osteoclasts
level, we
based on that
a cDNA library. Here, we report by differential
screening
of the
of them.
and Methods
Isolation of Osteoclasts. Unfractionated bone cells were isolated from tibiae, femora, humeri, ulnae, and radii of IO-day-old rabbits (Japan white, Saitama Experimental Animal, Saitama, Japan). After removal of connective tissues, these bones were minced into pieces in alpha-MEM (Flow Laboratories, McLean, VA). Cells were dissociated from bone fragments by vigorous vortexing. After removal of bone fragments by sedimentation under normal gravity, cells were collected from the supernatant by centrifugation. The cells were resuspended in alpha-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS and seeded into 90-mm tissue culture dishes (Falcon, Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ) at a number of forty million living cells per dish. After cultivation for 3 hours, the medium was exchanged for fresh medium. After an additional 20 hours of culture, the cells were washed with PBS to remove non-adherent cells and then treated with PBS containing 0.001% pronase E (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) and 0.02% EDTA for 10 minutes at 37°C. Stromal cells were removed by washing of the dishes several times with PBS, and the remaining osteoclasts were used for further analyses. To examine the response to calcitonin, the cells were treated with 70-7 M chick calcitonin in alpha-MEM containing 10% FBS before enzyme treatment. For the TRAcP staining, the cells were stained with the reagents of a May-Grunwald-Giemsa acid phosphatase kit (Sigma Chemical) in the presence of 50mM L-tartrate. Monoclonal antibody 23C6 was incubated with the cells at a concentration of 1 Ol.rg/ml in alpha-MEM containing 15% FBS and visualized by use of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse antibody. Construction of a cDNA librarv. Total RNA was prepared from isolated osteoclasts as described previously(8). Poly A+ RNA was purified by oligo-dT cellulose column chromatography and double stranded cDNA was synthesized. Synthesized cDNA was cloned into hgtl0 cloning vector by cDNA cloning system 3,gtlO (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England). The resulting library containing approximately 4x1 O4 independent clones were amplified and used for screening. Differential screenina. The screening of the library was performed as described previously(8). The cDNA library was screened with radioactive 912
Vol.
186, No. 2, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
cDNA probes of osteoclasts and unfractionated spleen one after the other, and osteoclast-specific clones were picked up. Radioactive probe was prepared from the cDNA insert of each clone, and cross-hybridization was performed. DNA sequencing was performed by dideoxy chain termination method. The DNA sequence was subjected to homology search against GenBank nucleotide sequence database (release 70.0). Northern blottina. Total RNA was prepared from each tissue isolated from a lo-day-old rabbit. The RNA was blotted onto a nylon membrane after formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis. 32P-Labeled radioactive probes were prepared by the random primer labeling procedure and used for hybridization.
Results From observation at the light microscope level, more than 95% of the cells that remained attached to the dishes after enzymatic removal of other adherent cells were multinucleate (Fig.la). A trace number of mononuclear cells were also observed. All of these multinucleate cells and some of the mononuclear ones were positive for TRAcP activity (Fig.la,
TRAcP-positive
cells u. total cells was 351 vs. 356 [>98%]) and monoclonal antibody 23C6 (Fig.1 b) which recognizes vitronectin receptors(4). Alkaline phosphatase and
Fig,. 1. Light micrographs of isolated statned for TRAcP(a) and immunostained 913
osteoclasts from rabbit long bones with monoclonal antibody 23(X(b).
Vol.
186,
No.
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1992
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
12345678
a
- 28s -18s
- 28s -18s
Fia. 2. Northern blot analysis of OC-1 and OC-2. s2P-Labeled radioactive probes were prepared from cDNA inserts of OC-1 (a) and OC-2 (b), and human p-actin gene (c) by the random primer labeling procedure and used for hybridization. Lanes contained lpg (a,b) or 2pg (c) of total RNA isolated from following sources:l, brain; 2, gut; 3, kidney; 4, liver; 5, lung; 6, spleen; 7, thymus; 8, osteoclasts. 18s and 28s indicate the migratory positions of 18s and 28s ribosomal RNA, respectively.
non-specific
esterase
indicating shown).
the absence Moreover,
response
activities these
osteoclastic osteoclasts previously(8). osteoclasts
and
from this cell population, macrophages
cells changed
(data
not
their morphology
in
before enzyme treatment
we concluded
Approximately
To characterize
cells
multinucleate
to 10s7M chick calcitonin
were osteoclasts. rabbit.
totally absent
of osteoblastic
From these observations,
osteoclasts.
were
(data not shown).
that these isolated multinucleate
3x105 osteoclasts
the isolated osteoclasts
were
obtained
in comparison
cells
from one
with other non-
cells, we performed differential cDNA cloning between and unfractionated spleen cells in the same manner as described A cDNA
library
Five thousand and spleen
clones
was
constructed
were
screened
cells one after the other,
from with
5x10s cDNA
and seventy-five
isolated probes
of
clones
specific for osteoclasts were picked up. By cross hybridization analysis, two clones, designated OC-1 and OC-2, representing 35 and 16, respectively, of the picked up clones and not hybridizing with each other, were selected. The remaining 24 clones were not specific for osteoclasts by RNA dot blot analysis and may be screening artifacts. OC-I and OC-2 contained cDNA inserts of approximately 1.4kb and 1.6kb, respectively. The frequencies OC-2 in the library were calculated as 0.7% and 0.3%, suggesting osteoclasts
of OC-I and respectively,
that these genes are expressed in rather high amount in isolated and are not derived from contaminating non-osteoclastic cells. 914
Vol.
186,
No.
2, 1992
Human Mouse Rat Pig
BIOCHEMICAL
: 1 : 1 : 1 : 1:
1
oc-1
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
MRIAVICFCLLGITCAIPVKQADSGSSEEKQLYNKYPDAVATWLNPDPSQ MRLAVICFCLFGIASSLPVKVTDSGSSEEK-LYSLHPDPIATWLVPDPSQ MRLAVVCLCLFGLASCLPVKVAEFGSSEEKAHYSKHSDAVATWLKPDPSQ MRIAVIAFCLWGFASALPVKQTNSGSSEEKLLSNKYTDAVATLLKPDPSQ MRIAVICFCLLGMAYALPVKHADSGSSEEKQLYHKHPDALATWLNPDPSQ
Human Mouse Rat Pig oc-1
51 50
Human Mouse Rat Pig
99 100 100 99 99
: : : : :
149 134
: VVPTVDTYDGRGDSVVYGL-RSKSKKFRRPDATDEDITSHMESEE : IVPTVDVPNGRGDSLAYGL-RSKSRSFQVSDEQYPDATDEDLTSHMKSGE : IAPTVDVPDGRGDSLAYGL-RSKSRSFPVSDEQYPDATDEDLTSRMKSQE : AVPTGDPNDGRGDSVVYGL-RSKSKKFRRSEAQQLDATEEDLTSHVESEE : VVPTVETYDGRGDSVAYRLKRSKSKMFHVSNAQYPGASEEDLSSHVDSED
oc-1
Human Mouse Rat pig oc-1
Human Mouse Rat Pig oc-1 Human Mouse Rat Pig
51 51
51
134 144 145 198
183 183 193 195
: KQNLLAPQNAVSSEETNDFKQETLPSKSNESHDHMDDMDDEDDD--DHVD : KQNLLAPQNAVSSEEKDDFKQETLPSNSNESHDHMDDDDDDDDDDGDHAG : KQNLLAPQNSVSSEETDDFKQETLPSNSNESHDHMDDDDDDDDD-GDHAE : KQTFLAPQNTISSEETDDFKQETLPSKSNESPEQTDDVDDDDDE--DHVD : KQNLLTPQNAMSSEEKDDLKQETLPSKSIESHDHMDDIDEDEDD--DHVD SQDSIDSNDSDDVDDTDDSHQSDESHHSDESDELVTDFPTDLPATEVFTP SEDSVD---SDE---------SDESHHSDESDE--TV--TASTQADTFTP SEDSVN---SDE---------SDESHHSDESDE--S-F-TASTQADVLTP SRD---T-DSEEADHADDADRSDESHHSDESDELVTDFPTDTPATDV-TP NRD---SNESDDADHPDDSHHSDESHQSDESDE-VTVYPTEDAATTVFTE
: LNGAYKAIPVAQDLNAPSDWDSRGKDSYETSQLDDQSAETHSHKQSRLYK : SKESLDVIPVAQLLSMPSDQDNNGKGSHESSQLDEPSLETHRLEHS---: SDEAIKVIPVAQRLSVPSDQDSNGKTSHESSQLDEPSVETHSLEQSKEYK : TDGTPKAILVAQRLHVASDLDSQEKDSQETSQPDDRSVETRSQEQSKEYT : LDDTPRAIPVAQHLNVPSDWDSQEKDSHDVSQVDDHSVETQSHEQARQYK
oc-1
233 243 245
: RKANDESNEHSDV------------------IDSQELSKVSREFHSHEFH : -KESQESADQSDV------------------IDSQASSKASLEHQSHKFH : QRASHESTEQSDAIDSAEKPDAIDSAERSDAIDSQASSKASLEHQSHEFH : IKTYDGSNEHSNV------------------IESQENPKVSQE-----FH : REANDNSVEHSHS------------------IDSQESSKVSQESQSREFR
Human
280
:
Mouse Rat Pig
260 283 270 277
: : : :
oc-1
240 229
COMMUNICATIONS
SHEDMLVVDPKSKEEDKHLKFRISHELDSASSEVN SHKDKLVLDPKSKEDDRYLKFRISHELIZSSSSEVN SHEDKLVLDPKSKEDDRYLKFRISHELESSSSEVN SHEDKLVPDSKS-EEDKHLKLRVSHELESASSEIN SHEDKLAIEPKSEEDEEHRQLRVSHELDSTSSEIN
Fia. 3. Comparison of the cDNA-deduced amino acid sequence of OC-1 with human, mouse, rat, and pig osteopontin. Amino acids are indicated by smgleletter codes, and numbers indicate the position number of the first amino acid in each line. Hyphens indicate gaps.
Tissue
specificity of X-1
and OC-2 was examined by Northern blot
analysis with total RNA prepared from various tissues of a lo-day-old
rabbit
(Fig.2). OC-I was expressed in osteoclasts and in kidneys, whereas OC-2 was specific for osteoclasts only. The nucleotide sequences of the cDNA inserts of these clones were determined, performed.
and a homology search was
OC-1 contained an open reading frame specifying 311 amino
acids; and, as seen in Fig.3, it shared significant homology throughout the sequence with cDNA-deduced sequences reported for human, mouse, rat, and pig osteopontin(9-12).
The amino acid sequence of OC-1 was 68.6%,
57.6%, 55.2%, and 62.8% identical with those of human, mouse, rat, and pig respectively. Therefore, OC-1 is supposedly the rabbit osteopontin, counterpart of this gene. OC-2 did not show any significant homology in this search, and would thus seem to represent an unknown gene. The structure of OC-2 will be described elsewhere. 915
Vol.
186, No. 2, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion The production of osteopontin has been reported in various cell types such as osteoblastic cells, kidney cells, nerve cells, and macrophages(l3-18). Mark &t a. (13) found that some osteoclasts and bone matrix adjacent to them are immunohistochemically positive for osteopontin; however, they could not be certain whether or not the osteopontin was produced by osteoclasts. Osteopontin released
produced by osteoblasts accumulates in bone matrix and is when
osteoclasts
resorb
bone.
For this reason, immunohistochemical techniques are not suitable for investigating whether osteoclasts produce osteopontin or not; and in bone tissues, osteopontin has long been believed to be produced by osteoblastic cells. However, our present
results
obtained
with isolated
osteoclasts
from
bone tissue
demonstrate that isolated osteoclasts express a large amount of osteopontin mRNA.
Thus, this paper represents
the first direct
demonstration
of
osteopontin in osteoclasts. Osteopcntin contains the cell-binding Arg-Gly-Asp sequence, and is thought to play an important role in adhesion of osteoclasts to bone surfaces(l9).
Moreover, Miyauchi et al. (20) recently reported that
osteopontin reduced the cytosolic calcium concentration
in osteoclasts via
vitronectin receptors. This fact indicates that osteopontin may also participate in regulation of osteoclast functions. Therefore, the osteopontin produced by osteoclasts may have important roles in osteoclastic bone resorption by not only participating
in binding of osteoclasts
to bone surfaces
but also
controlling some yet unspecified osteoclastic function(s).
Acknowledament: We thank Dr. Michael A. Horton for kindly providing monoclonal antibody 2366 and helpful discussions.
References 1. Kurihara, N., Suds, T., Miura, Y., Nakauchi, H., Kodama, H., Hiura, K., Hakeda, Y., and Kumegawa, M. (1989) Blood 74, 1295-1302. 2. Ek-Rylander, B., Bill, P., Norgard, M., Nilsson, S., and Andersson, G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 24684-24689. 3. Warshawsky, H., Goltzman, D., Rouleau, M.F., and Bergeron, J.J.M. (1980) J. Cell Biol. 85, 682-694. 4. Davies, J., Warwick, J., Totty, N., Philp, R., Helfrich, M., and Horton, M. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 1817-1826. 5. Rifkin, B.R., Vernillo, A.T., Kleckner, A.P., Auszmann, J.M., Rosenberg, L.R., and Zimmerman, M. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 179, 63-69. 6. Goto, T., Tsukuba, T., Ayasaka, N., Yamamoto, K., and Tanaka, T. (1992) Histochemistry 97, 13-l 8. 7. Chambers, T.J., and Magnus, C.J. (1982) J. Path. 136, 27-39. 8. Tezuka, K., Takeshita, S., Hakeda, Y., Kumegawa, M., Kikuno, R., and Hashimoto-Gotoh, T. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 173, 246-251.
Vol.
186,
No.
2, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
9. Kiefer, M.C., Bauer, D.M., and Barr, P.J. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 3306.
IO. Craig, A.M., Smith, J.H., and Denhardt, D.T. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 9682-9689. 11. Oldberg, A., Franzen, A., and Heinegard, D. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 881 g-8823. 12. Wrana, J.L., Zhang, Q., and Sodek, J. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 10119. 13. Mark, M.P., Prince, C.W., Oosawa, T., Gay, S., Bronckers, A.L.J.J., and Butler, W.T. (1987) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 35, 707-715. 14. Yoon, K., Buenaga, R., and Rodan, G.A. (1987) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 148, 1129-l 136. 15. Mark, M.P., Prince, C.W., Gay, S., Austin, R.L., and Butler, W.T. (1988) Cell Tissue Res. 251, 23-30. 16. Nomura, S., Wills, A.J., Edwards, D.R., Heath, J.K., and Hogan B.L.M. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 106, 441-450. 17. Mark, M.P., Butler, W.T., Prince, C.W., Finkelman R.D., and Ruth, J.-V. (1988) Differentiation 37, 123-l 36. 18. Miyazaki, Y., Setoguchi, M., Yoshida, S., Higuchi, Y., Akizuki, S., and Yamamoto, S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14432.14438. 19. Reinholt, F.P., Hultenby, K., Oldberg, A., and Heinegard, D. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4473-4475. 20. Miyauchi, A., Alvarez, J., Greenfield, E.M., Teti, A., Grano, M., Colucci, S., Zambonin-Zallone, A., Ross, F.P., Teitelbaum, S.L., Cheresh, D., and Hruska, K.A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 20369-20374.
917