Resources, Conservation and Recycling xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Resources, Conservation and Recycling journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/resconrec
Full length article
Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach Ling-ling Guo a,∗ , Ying Qu a , Chun-you Wu a , Xiao-ling Wang b a b
Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China Donlinks School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 30 March 2016 Received in revised form 30 September 2016 Accepted 30 September 2016 Available online xxx Keywords: Green growth System dynamics Scenario analysis Industrial regions Liaoning province
1. Introduction In order to address resource shortage and climate changes, an increasing number of countries start seeking out new growth modes to realize sustainable development. The governments of the countries, especially developing countries, try to find effective methods to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions, and improve environmental conditions. Many countries started to implement green growth (GG) strategies on country levels, and the “Global Green New Deal” has been introduced worldwide. GG, as a new mode of economic growth, was first proposed by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) in 2005 (ESCAP, 2005). It was defined as a strategy to promote “win-win” approaches and policies for
∗ Corresponding author at: Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Dalian, 116024, China. E-mail address: guolingling [email protected] (L.-l. Guo).
reconciling conflicts between two important Millennium Development Goals on poverty reduction and environmental sustainability (ESCAP, 2006). Subsequently, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) described GG as “fostering economic growth and development while ensuring that natural assets continue to provide resources and environmental services on which our well-being relies” (OECD, 2011), where “to do this, it must catalyze investment and innovation which will underpin sustained growth and give rise to new economic opportunities” (OECD, 2011). A consensus view of these two different definitions is that GG fully meets transformation objectives and requirements of conventional economic growth patterns. Since the introduction of GG, the concept was widely accepted by many countries, especially developed countries. For example, South Korea (Mathews, 2012), the UK (HM Government, 2009), Germany (Jänicke, 2012) and Canada (Webb and Esakin, 2011) adopted certain GG practices in order to achieve economic sustainability and low-carbon development. Since the opening and reforms, China’s average annual growth rate of GDP reached 9.81%, far above the world average level of
Please cite this article in press as: Guo, L.-l., et al., Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach. Resour Conserv Recy (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.035
G Model RECYCL-3385; No. of Pages 12 2
ARTICLE IN PRESS L.-l. Guo et al. / Resources, Conservation and Recycling xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
2.87%. However, rapid development also caused severe natural resource depletion and environmental pollutions. For instance, the total energy consumption in China increased by 207% from 1.36 billion tce in 1997 to 4.17 billion tce in 2013 (China’s National Bureau of Statistics, 2014a); waste water discharge increased by 1572% from 41.58 billion tons in 1997 to 695.44 billion tons in 2013; industrial waste gas emissions increased by 525% from 10.7 trillion cubic meters in 1998 to 66.9 trillion cubic meters in 2013; and industrial solid waste generation increased by 212% from 1.06 billion tons in 1997 to 3.31 million tons in 2013 (China’s National Bureau of Statistics, 2014b). In fact, according to experience in developed countries, the coordination of economy and environment can be greatly improved by implementing GG strategies (HM Government, 2009; Jänicke, 2012). Inspired by these significant achievements, Chinese government started to launch its own GG strategy in 2012 (The Eighteenth CPC National Congress, 2012). In the bulletin of the fifth plenary sessions of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party (Chinese Communist Party, 2015), the government specifically proposed to implement the green development idea during the 13th Five Year Plan, which demonstrates the government’s determination in pursuing GG. Therefore, the identification of effective pathways towards GG becomes significantly important for Chinese regions, especially traditional industrial areas suffering most serious natural resources exploitation and environmental pollutions. For these areas, it is crucial to implement the country’s GG strategy. Currently, there are several studies on the achievement of GG (OECD, 2010; Ploeg and Withagen, 2013). Based on successful GG experience in OECD member countries, OECD (2010) found that good policies had positive effects on improving regional green growth. Ploeg and Withagen (2013) indicated that the combination of R&D subsidies and carbon taxes was the best pathway to achieve green growth. Grover (2013) investigated India’s GG strategy, and discovered that there was a significant relationship between green innovations and GG. Lee and Kim (2016) indicated that the momentum from local governments and active citizen participation played key roles in implementing Korea’s green energy strategy. However, most studies focused on some specific pathways towards GG, such as a policy, R&D subsidies, innovation and so on. Only several attempts were made to integrate some pathway factors in a methodology framework by adopting theories and methods, such as the game theory (Carfì and Schilirò, 2012), statistical analysis (Kim et al., 2014; Zaman et al., 2016) and CGE models (Dai et al., 2016). Carfì and Schilirò (2012) devised an appropriate game theory model to address relationships among climate change policies, low-carbon technologies, and green economy, where a fair Kalai-Pareto solution of the competitive model for a win–win scenario was developed. Zaman et al. (2016) adopted econometric modeling techniques to examine effects of energy consumption, environment, health and wealth on BRICS countries’ green growth in 1975–2013. Dai et al. (2016) used a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to assess economic and environmental impact of large-scale development of renewable energy on green growth in Chinese power sector. The results indicate that large-scale renewable energy development has significant effects on green growth that benefits the development of upstream industries, reshapes the energy structure, and brings substantial environmental co-benefits. However, these existing studies are limited, since economy, resources and environment are major factors impacting the GG system. GG involves many complicate, dynamic and systematic activities, and is definitely influenced by various factors including population and policy (Musango et al., 2014). Therefore, it is extremely important to build an integrated system including economy, population, resources, pollution and policy to explore and identify pathways to achieve GG, which would make research results more close to the reality.
With this goal, a system dynamics (SD) method was applied to investigate the GG system. Our study is one of the first trails that explore dependent interactions among major influencing factors, discuss how the factors of economy, population, resources, environment and policies affect GG’s implementation, and further analyze dynamic change characteristics of major influencing factors in order to identify appropriate and feasible pathways to achieve Chinese GG. Also, our research contributes to examining prospects of long-term green economic growth, energy consumption and structure, and CO2 emissions in China. Using visual observations, the disparity between the current development mode and GG strategy can be confirmed. Additionally, this study can provide decision-makers, local governments and managers with some implications from the following aspects. First, the effects of environmental policies on GG are discussed in this paper. Therefore, for those governors who intend to protect their countries or regions facing severe resource shortage and environmental pollution, a strategy for enhancing environmental laws and regulations is given in the process of GG implementation. Moreover, although the SD framework is used for the case of Liaoning province, China, the structure of the model is similar to GG systems in many regions. Therefore, by changing values of some parameters, the SD model becomes also appropriate for other regions of China. The reminder of the paper is organized as follows. Literature review is presented in Section 2. The method is described in Section 3, including data and case background, problem analysis, and the SD model. Section 4 summarizes simulation results based on the model. Section 5 provides policy implications. Finally, Section 6 discusses main conclusions.
2. Literature review Compared to other methodologies, a SD model is chosen in this paper to identify pathways towards GG for two reasons. First, the method has excellent advantages in dealing with nonlinear, high order complex system problems, especially in analyzing socioeconomic-environmental systems (Sahin et al., 2015). Second, with the help of computer simulation techniques, the SD method can visually analyze relationships among various factors, simulate data, as well as describe information related to feedback structures, functions, and behavior of the system (Liu et al., 2015a,b). The model is much easier to apply to simulate various path scenarios to reveal dynamic evolution mechanisms of the GG system. The SD method was first proposed by J.W. Forrester and his colleagues in 1956, and was specifically designed to analyze complex dynamic feedback systems (Liu et al., 2015a,b). SD models are widely used in various fields, including economic-environmental systems (Niedertscheider et al., 2014), energy management and pollution control (Liu et al., 2015a,b), industrial policy and planning (Ansari and Seifi, 2012) and others. For instance, for economicenvironmental systems, F.J. Li et al. (2012) and F. Li et al. (2012) applied a SD model to analyze environmental and economic effects of the eco-agriculture system of Kongtong District, Pingliang City, Gansu Province, China, from 2009 to 2050. Zhang et al. (2014) built a SD simulation model for a regional ecological water carrying capacity to investigate the coordination development of social economy and water eco-environment in Siping area of Jilin Province, China. For energy management and pollution control, the SD method was widely applied to investigate the performance of energy consumption and CO2 emissions on the national, regional and industrial levels (Ansari and Seifi, 2013; Wang et al., 2016). Ansari and Seifi (2013) employed a SD model to study energy consumption and CO2 emission under different production and export scenarios in Iranian cement industry. Their simulation results indicate
Please cite this article in press as: Guo, L.-l., et al., Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach. Resour Conserv Recy (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.035
G Model RECYCL-3385; No. of Pages 12
ARTICLE IN PRESS L.-l. Guo et al. / Resources, Conservation and Recycling xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
that complete removal of energy subsidies and implementation of corrective policies can potentially lead to reduction in natural gas and electricity consumption by 29% and 21%, respectively, and reduction in CO2 emission by 22%. Feng et al. (2013) developed a SD model using the STELLA platform to simulate trends of energy consumption and CO2 emission in Beijing, China, over 2005–2030. The results show that a change in the energy structure may play an essential role in reducing carbon emission of Beijing. Robalino-López et al. (2014) presented a SD model of CO2 emissions in Ecuador to study how changes in the energy matrix and GDP affect CO2 emissions in 1980–2020. In addition, the SD method was also used in energy and environmental policy and regulation decision-making (F.J. Li et al., 2012; F. Li et al., 2012). Dace et al. (2015) built a SD model based on the IPCC guidelines and included main elements of an agricultural system to assess effects of various policy decisions and measures on agricultural GHG emissions in Latvia. For industrial policy and planning, the SD method is used to discuss effects of environmental policies, such as cleaner production policies and waste disposal charging policies, on high emission industries (Dong et al., 2012; Yuan and Wang, 2014). For instance, Yuan and Wang (2014) developed a SD model to determine appropriate waste disposal charging fees in the construction sector of Shenzhen, China. Additionally, a SD model was also applied to research usage of incentives policies in low emission and emerging industries, such as the photovoltaic power industry, and recycling and remanufacturing industry (Wang et al., 2014; Dace et al., 2014; Guo and Guo, 2015). For example, Guo and Guo (2015) presented a SD model to explore the impact of subsidy policies on the development of the recycling and remanufacturing industry related to Chinese auto parts. Their research findings show that mixed-subsidy policies have better positive effect on remanufacturing promotion than single subsidy policies, but they also involve higher costs. Previous studies showed how economic, environmental and political elements can be integrated in a SD model, and provided a certain foundation for further GG research. However, most existing research only focuses on optimization of economy and environment. With GG becoming a hot topic in academic circles, some researchers have started to employ the SD method to explore national and regional GG (Musango et al., 2014; Kuai et al., 2015). For example, Musango et al. (2014) developed an integrated system dynamics model to assess the green transition in South Africa, where four scenarios were simulated, and the most effective policy was identified. Kuai et al. (2015) used a SD model to evaluate different green transformation alternatives concerning three prominent factors, namely, the industrial scale, structure, and efficiency, in Linfen city, China. In addition, the SD method was also applied to research green transportation (Trappey et al., 2012), green power (Qudrat-Ullah, 2014), green building (Onat et al., 2014) and green supply chains (Tian et al., 2014). For instance, Trappey et al. (2012) designed a SD model for green transportation policies to evaluate the green transportation system and related policy effects in a smaller, controlled environment for Taiwan Island. Qudrat-Ullah (2014) created a green power SD model to evaluate long-term dynamics of Ontario’s electricity sector in the socio-economic and CO2 emissions dimensions. A similar research was done in Blumberga et al. (2014). Onat et al. (2014) utilized the SD method to analyze middle and long-term effect of green building relevant policies on the GHG emissions stock. The results show that only enhancing the construction rate of net zero or high performance green buildings is not conducive to stabilizing/reducing the GHG emissions trend unless retrofitting the existing residential building stock is severely identified as a strict policy along green building policies. A similar study was conducted by Teng et al. (2016). Tian et al. (2014) developed a SD model to study impacts of sub-
3
sidy policies on the diffusion of green supply chain management in Chinese automotive manufacturing industry. The research results indicate that subsidies for manufacturers are better than those for consumers to promote green supply chain management diffusion, where environmental awareness is another influential key factor. However, in spite of these studies, the literature on GG using the SD approach is scarce, especially regarding pathways to achieve GG. In addition, previous research rarely simulates dynamic interactions of economic growth, population development, resource consumption, environmental pollution, and policy responses in an integrated system model. To fill in these gaps and contribute to the existing literature, this paper aims to develop a SD model for the GG system with five subsystems, including economy, population, resource, environment, and policy, for a traditional industrial region, Liaoning province, China. In order to identify an appropriate path towards GG, the paper examines the prospects of long-term green GDP, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions under different path scenarios, and compares different simulation results for these scenarios. 3. Method 3.1. Data and case background Liaoning, a typical Chinese industrial province, is taken as the subject of the case study using a SD model. As shown in Fig. 1, Liaoning province is located in Northeast China, and has the most comprehensive categories of industry in the country. Among them, the equipment manufacturing and raw material industries in Liaoning are more developed than in other provinces, playing an important role in the country economics. In 2014, the GDP growth rate of Liaoning was 5.8%, and 44.2% of the economic added value was created by the secondary industry (Liaoning Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2015). Although the industries have enormous contribution to the economic growth, they cause problems related to resource consumption and pollutants discharge. For example, in 2014, the total energy consumption of the province was 205.86 million tce, and the industries consumed 60.7% of this amount. The total SO2 , and smoke and dust emissions were 0.99 and 1.12 million tons, respectively, ranked the sixth and fourth in the country, respectively (Liaoning Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2015). Because of the serious air pollution problems, two cities in the Liaoning province, Liaoyang and Jinzhou, were ranked the twelfth and sixteenth out of 258 major cities in terms of air pollution (China’s Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2014). In addition, four cities and three municipal districts in Liaoning province were identified as resource-exhausted cities by the State Council of China (The State Council, 2012). To fully reinvigorate economic growth and improve environmental quality, the local government tries to explore new sustainable paths during the 13th Five Year Plan. In this paper, the parameters and variables of the model are mostly taken from investigated and statistical data. The statistical data on economic, population, resources, and R&D indicators was mainly obtained from the Liaoning Statistical Yearbook (2002–2015), and the data on environmental investment indicators was originally taken from the China Statistical Yearbook on Environment (2002–2014). Some empirical formulas were also adopted for data due to lack of sufficient data resources. 3.2. System structure analysis The SD method is a computer simulation modeling technique used to frame, understand, and discuss complex issues. In general, the SD method includes the following steps: system structure anal-
Please cite this article in press as: Guo, L.-l., et al., Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach. Resour Conserv Recy (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.035
G Model RECYCL-3385; No. of Pages 12 4
ARTICLE IN PRESS L.-l. Guo et al. / Resources, Conservation and Recycling xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
Fig. 1. Location of Liaoning province in China.
ysis, model development, model validation, and scenario definition (Kuai et al., 2015). The system structure analysis is a premise of the system dynamics modeling. It incorporates qualitative description of relationships among elements included in the system, which can help the modeler become familiar with the GG system under study. The system structure analysis contains the following steps: determining system boundaries, defining system variables and parameters, and constructing causal feedback. In this case, the purpose of simulation is to find an appropriate and feasible pathway to achieve GG based on the five aspects including economy, population, resources, environment, and policy. Therefore, a model is developed within the boundaries of social-economic growth, corresponding resource and environmental performance, and policy response. Excessive consumption of resources and severe environmental pollution are external pressures of GG. According to the concept of GG, its achievement is mainly affected by two drivers, namely, technical innovations and capital investments, which are external policy response elements (OECD, 2011). Based on policy measures, energy savings and emission reductions can be achieved, which will further promote GG. The first set of variables focuses on economic and population growth. The second set of variables focusing on environmental and resource objectives, is defined as intensities of energy consumption and CO2 emissions. The third set of policy variables considers R&D expenditure, environmental protection investments, and pollution control investments. In addition, other variables and parameters are used as auxiliary variables. In the GG system, resource inputs and pollution outputs are driven by rapid economic growth. The faster the growth rate, the higher resource inputs and pollution outputs. Technical innovations and investments may influence the efficiency of economic growth. When technology expenditure is directed toward pollution
treatment, and environmental investments are increased, environmental costs become lower, and the net GDP growth rate becomes larger; and vice versa. This is what constitutes the feedback from external pressures and external policies. Adjustments can be made to the system to meet economic, environmental and resource objectives. All variables are described in Fig. 2. 3.3. Model development A flowchart of the stock-and-flow diagram is developed within the SD model after analyzing the system structure (see Fig. 3), including three types of variables, namely, the level, rate, and auxiliary variables. Level variables describe the cumulative effects of the system, and depend on the accumulation of materials, energy, and information over time. Rate variables reflect changes in level variables over time, and represent the speed of such changes in the system. Auxiliary variables are intermediate variables used
Fig. 2. System analysis framework of Liaoning’s GG system.
Please cite this article in press as: Guo, L.-l., et al., Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach. Resour Conserv Recy (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.035
G Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS
RECYCL-3385; No. of Pages 12
L.-l. Guo et al. / Resources, Conservation and Recycling xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
energy consumption per capita energy consumption per unit of GDP GDP per capita