Accepted Manuscript Impact of sarcopenic obesity on 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis
Yun Ji, Baoli Cheng, Zhipeng Xu, Hui Ye, Weina Lu, Xiaoqian Luo, Shuiqiao Fu, Xiangming Fang PII: DOI: Reference:
S0883-9441(17)31982-2 doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.019 YJCRC 52888
To appear in: Please cite this article as: Yun Ji, Baoli Cheng, Zhipeng Xu, Hui Ye, Weina Lu, Xiaoqian Luo, Shuiqiao Fu, Xiangming Fang , Impact of sarcopenic obesity on 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. The address for the corresponding author was captured as affiliation for all authors. Please check if appropriate. Yjcrc(2017), doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.019
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Title: Impact of sarcopenic obesity on 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis Authors: a, b, 1
, Baoli Cheng
b, 1
, Zhipeng Xu b, Hui Ye b, Weina Lu a, Xiaoqian Luo a, Shuiqiao Fu a,
PT
Yun Ji
Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School
SC
a
RI
Xiangming Fang b
of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, China, 310009. Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University,
1
MA
79 QingChun Road, Hangzhou, China, 310003.
NU
b
Equal contributors.
D
Corresponding Author:
PT E
Xiangming Fang, Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 QingChun Road, Hangzhou, China, 310003. Tel: +8613857161019, E-mail:
AC
Funding:
CE
[email protected].
No financial support was provided for the study. Conflicts of interest:
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenic obesity and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. Material and methods: We analyzed 236 surgical ICU patients with sepsis due to intra-abdominal
PT
infection who underwent urgent surgical intervention. Sarcopenia, visceral obesity and sarcopenic
RI
obesity were analyzed by computed tomography scans using the third lumbar vertebrae skeletal muscle
SC
index and visceral adipose tissue area, using previously reported cutoff values.
Results: The cohort was divided into 4 groups: 52 were diagnosed with sarcopenic obesity, 62 with
NU
sarcopenia only, 58 with visceral obesity only, and 64 with no sarcopenia or visceral obesity. 57 (24.2%)
MA
patients died within 30 days. The frequency of 30-day mortality differed significantly among the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that only sarcopenic obesity was associated with increased risk for 30-day
D
mortality. Sarcopenic patients were older than non-sarcopenic patients. To address this limitation,
PT E
subgroup analyses stratified by age showed that the risk of 30-day mortality increased significantly in sarcopenic patients, both in patients with age ≤70 years and in those with age >70 years.
CE
Conclusion: Sarcopenic obesity is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality in critically ill patients
AC
with intra-abdominal sepsis.
Keywords: Body composition Computed tomography Critical illness Sarcopenia Visceral obesity
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. Introduction Sepsis continues to be a common problem in clinical practice [1]. Despite advances in care, a recent systematic review suggests that sepsis may contribute to up to 5.3 million deaths worldwide per year [2]. Therefore, identifying which patients with sepsis are at high risk of adverse outcomes is a clinical priority.
PT
Two novel prognostic body composition parameters receiving attention in sepsis are sarcopenia (low
RI
skeletal muscle mass) and visceral obesity [3, 4]. Sarcopenia predicts higher hospital mortality [3].
SC
Similarly, visceral obesity predicts adverse outcome [4]. By using diagnostic imaging such as abdominal computed tomography (CT), muscle mass and fat mass can be quantified precisely to reveal sarcopenia
NU
and visceral obesity that would otherwise go undetected [5]. However, if there is an additional effect on
MA
outcome of these two prognostic parameters present at the same time, i.e. sarcopenic obesity [6], is unknown.
D
Given that preoperative abdominal CT evaluation in patients with intra-abdominal sepsis is prevalent,
PT E
opportunistic screening for sarcopenia, visceral obesity, and sarcopenic obesity can be applied in this patient group. Thus, we focused on patients with sepsis of intra-abdominal origin who underwent urgent
CE
surgical intervention and were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to investigate
AC
the association between sarcopenic obesity and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with intraabdominal sepsis.
2. Material and methods 2.1. Study design, setting, and participants This is a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a tertiary-level, surgical ICU of the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine, a large academic medical center, between 3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
August 1, 2012, and July 31, 2016. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with severe sepsis or septic shock due to intra-abdominal infection who underwent urgent surgical intervention (e.g., laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery, or percutaneous drainage of an abscess) before ICU admission. Severe sepsis and septic shock were defined following the criteria of the American College of Chest
PT
Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine [7]. Patients without preoperative abdominal CT imaging
RI
or without adequate CT images were excluded. The institutional review board for the Second Affiliated
SC
Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine approved the study and provided a waiver of consent.
NU
2.2. Exposure variables
MA
The primary exposure variables were sarcopenia, visceral obesity, and sarcopenic obesity. For sarcopenia, we used previously reported skeletal muscle index thresholds of 40.8 cm 2/m2 for male and 34.9 cm2/m2
D
for female [8], which are calculated from cross-sectional skeletal muscle area at the level of the third
PT E
lumbar vertebra. These cutoff values were used because they were based on the characteristics of the Chinese population [8]. We chose skeletal muscle index to define sarcopenia because it has been widely
CE
accepted for use in research [9]. Visceral obesity was defined as a visceral adipose tissue area exceeding
AC
100 cm2 in both sexes [10]. This value is widely used as a cutoff value to define visceral obesity for Asian population [11,12]. Based on these thresholds, the cohort was split into four groups: those with no sarcopenia or visceral obesity (neither), those with visceral obesity only (VO), those with sarcopenia only (SR), and those with sarcopenic obesity (SO).
2.3. Imaging analysis CT images were retrieved from the institutional Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
CT image analysis using ImageJ version 1.51g software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA) [13] was performed as described previously [5,14]. Representative images used for analysis are shown in Figure 1. A single axial CT slice at the mid third lumbar vertebra level was selected and assessed for each patient. For sarcopenia, cross-sectional skeletal muscle area was measured using a Hounsfield unit
PT
threshold from −29 to 150. The cross-sectional skeletal muscle area measurements included the following
RI
muscles: the psoas, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum, transversus abdominis, internal and external
SC
obliques and rectus abdominis. Skeletal muscle index was calculated by normalizing the cross-sectional skeletal muscle area by height (m) squared and reported as cm2/m2. For visceral obesity, we measured
NU
the visceral adipose tissue area using a Hounsfield unit threshold from −190 to −30. The same researcher
MA
who conducted the image analysis (Y.J.) was blinded to clinical outcomes during the analysis period. The measurement of cross-sectional skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue area was performed two
D
times for each image, at least 1 week apart. Intra-observer reproducibility was evaluated based on the
PT E
two measurements by the same researcher (Y.J.) by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient
AC
2.4. Covariates
CE
(ICC=0.99).
Demographic characteristics (age, sex, and body mass index [BMI]), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on ICU admission, and clinical data (use of vasopressor, use of mechanical ventilation, diagnosis of intraabdominal infection, type of surgical intervention, and pathogen type in peritoneal fluid culture) were obtained from patient medical records.
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2.5. Outcome measures The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality after ICU admission. Secondary outcome measures included ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and hospital costs.
PT
2.6. Statistical analysis
RI
Data are expressed as median with interquartile range for continuous variables or number with percentage
SC
for categorical variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate 30-day mortality.
NU
Testing for differences in mortality between groups was by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards
MA
regression analyses was used to examine covariate-adjusted associations between body composition parameters and 30-day mortality. Variables with known clinical influence or exhibiting significant
D
associations after univariate analyses were included in the multivariate analysis. Diagnosis of intra-
PT E
abdominal infection, type of surgical intervention, and pathogen type in peritoneal fluid culture were dichotomized into perforated hollow viscus vs all other diagnosis, open surgery vs other surgical
CE
intervention, mixed organism vs all other pathogen types, respectively, for inclusion in the models.
AC
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 24.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results Between August 1, 2012, and July 31, 2016, 287 patients aged 18 years and older with intra-abdominal sepsis admitted to the surgical ICU of the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine who had urgent surgical intervention. A total of 51 patients (17.8%) were excluded (33 [64.7%] 6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
because of no preoperative abdominal CT images, 12 [23.5%] because of missing data, and 6 [11.8%] because of low-quality CT images). Among the 236 patients included in this study, 172 (72.9%) had at least 1 prognostic body composition parameter (i.e. VO, SR, or SO), including 64 (27.1%) in the neither group, 58 (24.6%) in the VO group, 62 (26.3%) in the SR group, and 52 (22.0%) in the SO group. Figure
PT
2 shows the flow diagram of patient enrolment and exclusion. The demographics and baseline
RI
characteristics are shown in Table 1.
SC
In the study cohort, 57 (24.2%) died within 30 days. The frequency of 30-day mortality differed significantly among the groups (Table 2). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between
NU
the neither group and the SO group (5 death [7.8%] vs 23 [44.2%]; P<0.001), between the neither group
MA
and the SR group (5 [7.8%] vs 18 [29.0%]; P=0.002), and between the VO group and the SO group (11 [19.0%] vs 23 [44.2%]; P=0.004). Crude Kaplan-Meier 30-day survival curves corroborated these
D
differences (Figure 3; log-rank χ2=22.0; P<0.001). Pairwise comparisons again revealed significant
PT E
differences between the curve of the neither group and the curve of the SO group, between the curve of the neither group and the curve of the SR group, and between the curve of VO group and the curve of
CE
SO group. Further analysis adjusted for covariates of age, use of vasopressor, mixed organism and
AC
APACHE II score or SOFA score using Cox models. The adjusted regression analysis showed that sarcopenic obesity was the only body composition parameter independently associated with increased risk for 30-day mortality (Table 3). Comparisons among the 4 groups over 3 secondary outcomes are listed in Table 2. ICU lengths of stay differed significantly among the groups (P < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences only when comparing the group without sarcopenia or visceral obesity (3 days [2-5]) with any of the remaining 3 groups (SO: 6 [3-14], P<0.001; SR: 5 [3-10], P=0.002; VO: 5 [2-10], P=0.013). 7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Hospital costs also differed significantly among the groups (P=0.034). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences only between the group without sarcopenia or visceral obesity and the VO group (12 thousands US $ [6-18] vs 20 [9-30], P = 0.041). Hospital lengths of stay did not differ among the groups.
PT
In addition to the above analysis based on 4 groups, patients were also divided into two groups using
RI
the cutoff values described above: sarcopenic patients (n = 114)/non-sarcopenic patients (n = 122);
SC
visceral obese patients (n = 110)/non-visceral obese patients (n = 126). The adjusted regression analysis showed that sarcopenia was significantly associated with increased risk for 30-day mortality
NU
(Supplemental Table 1). Another adjusted regression analysis showed that visceral obesity was
MA
borderline significantly associated with increased risk for 30-day mortality (Supplemental Table 1). Age is similar between visceral obese patients and non-visceral obese patients, nevertheless, age is
D
significantly higher in sarcopenic patients than non-sarcopenic patients (p <0.001). To address this
PT E
limitation, we conducted subgroup analyses stratified by age. In subgroup analyses, the risk of 30-day mortality still increased significantly in sarcopenic patients, both in patients with age ≤70 years (hazard
CE
ratio [HR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.7; P = 0.035) and in those with age >70 years (HR
AC
2.8; 95% CI 1.1-7.3; P = 0.031).
4. Discussion
In this study, we found that sarcopenic obesity was the only independent risk factor for 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate this relationship in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. The findings suggest that sarcopenic obesity assessment should become part of the risk stratification in critically ill patients 8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
with intra-abdominal sepsis. Sarcopenia and visceral obesity are considered as the multifactorial syndromes with various overlapping causes and feedback mechanisms supposed to be strongly interconnect and aggravate each other [6, 15]. Loss of skeletal muscle induces a decline in basal metabolic rate [16], and reduce total
PT
energy expenditure, which might lead to visceral obesity [17]. On the other hand, increased visceral
RI
adiposity secretes more pro-inflammatory cytokines and induces chronic inflammation, which can
SC
contribute to the development and progression of sarcopenia [18]. Sarcopenia and visceral obesity may act synergistically thus maximizing their health threatening effects [11, 19]. For example, Lim et al [11]
NU
found in a community-based elderly cohort an OR of 2.64 for metabolic syndrome for subjects with pure
MA
sarcopenia compared with healthy peers, an OR of 5.51 for subjects with pure visceral obesity, but an OR of 8.28 for sarcopenic obesity.
D
Up to now, only a small amount of studies has examined the effect of sarcopenia or visceral obesity
PT E
on the outcomes of critically ill patients [20-22]. For sarcopenia, a recent study by Moisey et al. [20] in 149 injured elderly ICU patients found that sarcopenia is an independent predictor of ventilator-free days,
CE
ICU-free days, and mortality. Another recent study by Mueller et.al [21] in 102 surgical ICU patients
AC
showed that sarcopenia predicts adverse discharge disposition equally well as frailty. For visceral obesity, Shashaty et al [22] found that visceral obesity to be an independent predictor of acute kidney injury in 327 critically injured trauma patients. It is worth noting that in these studies, some patients with sarcopenia or visceral obesity may be sarcopenic-obese, but the number of sarcopenic-obese patients is unknown. In this study, critically ill intra-abdominal septic patients were classified into one of four body composition categories according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia or visceral obesity. This study’s results showed that only sarcopenic obesity was associated with increased risk for 30-day 9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
mortality. Therefore, it is vital to assess both visceral adipose tissue and muscle areas at the same time in terms of prognostication. In the present study, the BMI values in the SO and VO group are seemingly low (SO: 23 kg/m2; VO: 26 kg/m2). However, the values are similar to that reported by Kobayashi et. al [23] in Asian populations.
PT
In their study of the impact of sarcopenic obesity on outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy for
RI
hepatocellular carcinoma, Kobayashi et. al [23] reported the BMI values in SO group and VO group were
SC
22.5 kg/m2 and 25.6 kg/m2, respectively. They also reported that BMI did not identify more than half of the patients with excess visceral adipose tissue in their study [23]. In addition, other studies have shown
NU
that for the similar BMI values, Asians have a prominent visceral obesity compared to Caucasians [24,
MA
25]. Therefore, the seemingly low BMI values in the SO and VO group in the present study may be partly due to the limitation of BMI in accurately measuring adiposity and partly due to the different body
D
compositions in Asian individuals versus Caucasians.
PT E
In the present study, sarcopenic patients were older than non-sarcopenic patients. Age may therefore be a confounder. Therefore, we included age as a covariate in all Cox regression models. More
CE
importantly, to address this limitation, we conducted subgroup analyses stratified by age (≤70 and >
AC
70 years) and observed results similar to the combined analysis. This study has several advantages. First, this cohort was not limited to elderly patients because sarcopenia or visceral obesity is not only a condition of the elderly [26]. Second, previous studies usually used BMI for the definition of obesity [27]. In this study, the visceral adipose tissue area was used to define visceral obesity, which has greater health consequence than peripheral obesity [28]. This study has several limitations. First, the retrospective nature of this study makes it impossible to establish a cause-effect relationship. Second, skeletal muscle quality was not considered in this study. 10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Low skeletal muscle quality as assessed by CT-derived skeletal muscle density was reported to be associated with higher 6-month mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients [29]. Third, larger multicenter studies would be needed to validate the present findings.
PT
5. Conclusion
RI
In conclusion, sarcopenic obesity is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality in critically ill
MA
NU
Funding: No financial support was provided for the study.
SC
patients with intra-abdominal sepsis.
D
Conflicts of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
[1]
PT E
References
Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado FR, Schachter RD, Finfer S. Recognizing Sepsis
Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al.
AC
[2]
CE
as a Global Health Priority—A WHO Resolution. N Engl J Med 2017; 377(5):414-7.
Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193(3):259-72. [3]
Shibahashi K, Sugiyama K, Kashiura M, Hamabe Y. Decreasing skeletal muscle as a risk factor for mortality in elderly patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. J Intensive Care 2017; 5(1):8.
[4]
Pisitsak C, Lee JG, Boyd JH, Coxson HO, Russell JA, Walley KR. Increased ratio of visceral 11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
to subcutaneous adipose tissue in septic patients is associated with adverse outcome. Crit Care Med 2016; 44(11):1966-73. [5]
van Vugt JL, Levolger S, Gharbharan A, Koek M, Niessen WJ, Burger JW, et al. A comparative study of software programmes for cross-sectional skeletal muscle and adipose tissue
PT
measurements on abdominal computed tomography scans of rectal cancer patients. J Cachexia
Kalinkovich A, Livshits G. Sarcopenic obesity or obese sarcopenia: A cross talk between age-
SC
[6]
RI
Sarcopenia Muscle 2017; 8(2):285-97.
associated adipose tissue and skeletal muscle inflammation as a main mechanism of the
Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001
MA
[7]
NU
pathogenesis. Ageing Res Rev 2017; 35:200-21.
sccm/esicm/accp/ats/sis international sepsis definitions conference. Intensive Care Med 2003;
Zhuang C-L, Huang D-D, Pang W-Y, Zhou C-J, Wang S-L, Lou N, et al. Sarcopenia is an
PT E
[8]
D
29(4):530-8.
independent predictor of severe postoperative complications and long-term survival after radical
Boutin RD, Yao L, Canter RJ, Lenchik L. Sarcopenia: current concepts and imaging
AC
[9]
CE
gastrectomy for gastric cancer. analysis from a large-scale cohort. Medicine 2016; 95(13):e3164.
implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205(3):W255-66. [10]
Kanazawa M, Yoshiike N, Osaka T, Numba Y, Zimmet P, Inoue S. Criteria and classification of obesity in Japan and Asia‐Oceania. Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr 2002;11(s8):S732-7.
[11]
Lim S, Kim JH, Yoon JW, Kang SM, Choi SH, Park YJ, et al. Sarcopenic obesity: prevalence and association with metabolic syndrome in the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA). Diabetes care 2010; 33 (7):1652-4. 12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[12]
Choi MH, Oh SN, Lee IK, Oh ST, Won DD. Sarcopenia is negatively associated with long-term outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017; doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12234.
[13]
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.
Gomez-Perez SL, Haus JM, Sheean P, Patel B, Mar W, Chaudhry V, et al. Measuring abdominal
RI
[14]
PT
Nat methods 2012; 9(7):671-5.
SC
circumference and skeletal muscle from a single cross-sectional computed tomography image:
Enteral Nutr 2016; 40(3):308-18.
Kohara K. Sarcopenic obesity in aging population: current status and future directions for
MA
[15]
NU
A step-by-step guide for clinicians using national institutes of health ImageJ. JPEN J Parenter
research. Endocrine 2014; 45(1):15-25.
Zoico E, Di Francesco V, Guralnik J, Mazzali G, Bortolani A, Guariento S, et al. Physical
D
[16]
PT E
disability and muscular strength in relation to obesity and different body composition indexes in a sample of healthy elderly women. Int J Obes 2004; 28(2):234-41. Kim TN, Choi KM. The implications of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity on cardiometabolic
CE
[17]
[18]
AC
disease. J Cell Biochem 2015; 116(7):1171-8. Stenholm S, Harris TB, Rantanen T, Visser M, Kritchevsky SB, Ferrucci L. Sarcopenic obesity: definition, cause and consequences. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2008; 11(6):693-700. [19]
Kim TN, Park MS, Ryu JY, Choi HY, Hong HC, Yoo HJ, et al. Impact of visceral fat on skeletal muscle mass and vice versa in a prospective cohort study: the Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study (KSOS). PloS one 2014; 9(12):e115407.
[20]
Moisey LL, Mourtzakis M, Cotton BA, Premji T, Heyland DK, Wade CE, et al. Skeletal muscle 13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
predicts ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and mortality in elderly ICU patients. Crit Care 2013; 17(5):R206. [21]
Mueller N, Murthy S, Tainter CR, Lee J, Riddell K, Fintelmann FJ, et al. Can sarcopenia quantified by ultrasound of the rectus femoris muscle predict adverse outcome of surgical
PT
intensive care unit patients as well as frailty? a prospective, observational cohort study. Ann
Shashaty MG, Kalkan E, Bellamy SL, Reilly JP, Holena DN, Cummins K, et al. Computed
SC
[22]
RI
Surg 2016; 264(6):1116-24.
tomography-defined abdominal adiposity is associated with acute kidney injury in critically ill
Kobayashi A, Kaido T, Hamaguchi Y, Okumura S, Shirai H, Yao S, et al. Impact of sarcopenic
MA
[23]
NU
trauma patients. Crit Care Med 2014; 42(7):1619-28.
obesity on outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann
Yoon K-H, Lee J-H, Kim J-W, Cho JH, Choi Y-H, Ko S-H, et al. Epidemic obesity and type 2
PT E
[24]
D
Surg 2017; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002555.
diabetes in Asia. Lancet 2006; 368(9548):1681-8. Wulan SN, Westerterp KR, Plasqui G. Ethnic differences in body composition and the
CE
[25]
AC
associated metabolic profile: A comparative study between Asians and Caucasians. Maturitas 2010; 65(4): 315-9. [26]
Muscaritoli M, Anker SD, Argilés J, Aversa Z, Bauer JM, Biolo G, et al. Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: Joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) “cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases” and “nutrition in geriatrics”. Clin Nutr 2010; 29(2):154-9.
[27]
Cauley JA. An Overview of sarcopenic obesity. J Clin Densitom 2015; 18(4):499-505. 14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[28]
Despres JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature 2006; 444(7121):881-7.
[29]
Looijaard WGPM, Dekker IM, Stapel SN, Girbes ARJ, Twisk JWR, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, et al. Skeletal muscle quality as assessed by CT-derived skeletal muscle density is
PT
associated with 6-month mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Crit Care
SC
RI
2016; 20(1):386.
Figure Legends
NU
Fig. 1. This image shows computed tomography scans at the level of the third lumbar vertebra of four
MA
intra-abdominal septic patients. The red shadows show the skeletal muscle area and the white shadows in the abdominal cavity show visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) = skeletal
D
muscle area/ height2 (cm2/m2). (A) A man patient with no sarcopenia or visceral obesity (neither). SMI
PT E
= 57.6 cm2/m2, VAT area = 51.3 cm2. (B) A man patient with visceral obesity only (VO). SMI = 49.7 cm2/m2, VAT area = 163.3 cm2. (C) A man patient with sarcopenia only (SR). SMI = 33.1 cm2/m2, VAT
AC
cm2.
CE
area = 53.5 cm2. (D) A man patient with sarcopenic obesity (SO). SMI = 32.0 cm2/m2, VAT area = 148.7
Fig. 2. Study participant flow diagram. Fig. 3. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates stratified by body composition parameters. Patients were divided into groups with no sarcopenia or visceral obesity (neither), with visceral obesity only (VO), with sarcopenia only (SR), and with sarcopenic obesity (SO), which were significantly different (log-rank χ2=22.0; P<0.001).
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1 Demographics and baseline characteristics NO. (%) No
sarcopenia
or
visceral obesity
Visceral obesity
Sarcopenia
Sarcopenic obesity (n
(n = 58)
(n = 62)
= 52)
(n = 64)
Age (years)
58 (44-69)
66 (53-74)
76 (65-81)
75 (69-83)
Female
27 (42.2)
16 (27.6)
32 (51.6)
22 (42.3)
BMI (kg/m )
22 (20-24)
26 (24-28)
19 (18-21)
23 (21-25)
APACHE II score
13 (8-16)
13 (10-16)
14 (12-17)
15 (12-18)
SOFA score
5 (3-7)
5 (3-7)
5 (4-8)
6 (5-9)
Use of vasopressor
26 (40.6)
28 (48.3)
40 (64.5)
34 (65.4)
Use of mechanical ventilation
56 (87.5)
54 (93.1)
56 (90.3)
48 (92.3)
Complicated appendicitis
4 (6.3)
6 (10.3)
Complicated cholecystitis
4 (6.3)
5 (8.6)
Gastro-duodenal perforations
14 (21.9)
10 (17.2)
Small bowel perforation
15 (23.4)
10 (17.2)
Colonic or rectal perforation
7 (10.9)
Postsurgical peritonitis
7 (10.9)
Others
13 (20.3)
2 (3.1)
Percutaneous
3 (4.7)
Pathogen type in peritoneal fluid culture
7 (13.5)
3 (4.8)
11 (21.2)
12 (19.4)
7 (13.5)
22 (35.5)
9 (17.3)
10 (17.2)
13 (21.0)
8 (15.4)
5 (8.6)
2 (3.2)
4 (7.7)
12 (20.7)
6 (9.7)
6 (11.5)
49 (84.5)
55 (88.7)
50 (96.2)
3 (5.2)
2 (3.2)
2 (3.8)
6 (10.3)
5 (8.1)
0
NU
4 (6.5)
MA
Laparoscopic
PT E
59 (92.2)
D
Surgical intervention Open
RI
Diagnosis
SC
2
PT
Characteristic
3 (4.7)
10 (17.2)
3 (4.8)
5 (9.6)
Gram-negative alone
22 (34.4)
25 (43.1)
23 (37.1)
19 (36.5)
11 (17.2)
5 (8.6)
10 (16.1)
6 (11.5)
6 (9.4)
3 (5.2)
14 (22.6)
6 (11.5)
22 (34.4)
15 (25.9)
12 (19.4)
16 (30.8)
Others None
AC
Mixed organism
CE
Gram-positive alone
APACHE II indicates Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; BMI, body mass index; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2 Primary and secondary outcome measures NO. (%) No sarcopenia or
Visceral obesity
Sarcopenia
Sarcopenic
visceral obesity
(n = 58)
(n = 62)
obesity (n = 52)
(n = 64) Outcome
P value 5 (7.8)
11 (19.0)
18 (29.0)
23 (44.2)
<0.001
ICU LOS (days)
3 (2-5)
5 (2-10)
5 (3-10)
6 (3-14)
<0.001
Hospital LOS (days)
17 (11-29)
23 (16-43)
19 (12-30)
20 (11-29)
0.139
Hospital costs (US $ in thousands) a
12 (6-18)
20 (9-30)
13 (7-22)
15 (10-29)
0.034
RI SC
ICU indicates intensive care unit; LOS, lengths of stay.
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
Data available in 224 patients.
AC
a
PT
30-day mortality
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted analyses for 30-day mortality Model 1a
Unadjusted
Model 2b
Body composition parameter P value
HR (95% CI)
P value
HR (95% CI)
P value
No sarcopenia or visceral obesity
1 [Reference]
NA
1 [Reference]
NA
1 [Reference]
NA
Visceral obesity only
2.5 (0.9-7.3)
0.084
2.2 (0.7-6.4)
0.155
2.0 (0.7-6.0)
0.210
Sarcopenia only
4.0 (1.5-10.9)
0.006
2.7 (0.9-7.5)
0.065
2.3 (0.8-6.6)
0.129
Sarcopenic obesity
6.8 (2.6-17.8)
<0.001
4.6 (1.7-12.8)
0.003
4.2 (1.5-11.6)
0.007
RI
PT
HR (95% CI)
Adjusted by age, use of vasopressor, mixed organism, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score.
b
Adjusted by age, use of vasopressor, mixed organism, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
a
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights Sarcopenic obesity has attracted much attention. We investigate the association between sarcopenic obesity and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. Sarcopenic obesity is
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis.
19
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3