Improved middle-ear soft-tissue visualization using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging

Improved middle-ear soft-tissue visualization using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging

Accepted Manuscript Improved middle-ear soft-tissue visualization using synchrotron radiation phasecontrast imaging Mai Elfarnawany, Seyed Alireza Roh...

9MB Sizes 1 Downloads 157 Views

Accepted Manuscript Improved middle-ear soft-tissue visualization using synchrotron radiation phasecontrast imaging Mai Elfarnawany, Seyed Alireza Rohani, Soroush Ghomashchi, Daniel G. Allen, Ning Zhu, Sumit K. Agrawal, Hanif M. Ladak PII:

S0378-5955(17)30029-1

DOI:

10.1016/j.heares.2017.08.001

Reference:

HEARES 7408

To appear in:

Hearing Research

Received Date: 22 February 2017 Revised Date:

30 July 2017

Accepted Date: 2 August 2017

Please cite this article as: Elfarnawany, M., Rohani, S.A., Ghomashchi, S., Allen, D.G., Zhu, N., Agrawal, S.K., Ladak, H.M., Improved middle-ear soft-tissue visualization using synchrotron radiation phasecontrast imaging, Hearing Research (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.08.001. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Improved Middle-Ear Soft-Tissue Visualization Using Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging

RI PT

Mai Elfarnawany1,§, Seyed Alireza Rohani2, Soroush Ghomashchi3, Daniel G. Allen3, Ning Zhu4, Sumit K. Agrawal1, 2, 3, 5,*, and Hanif M. Ladak1, 2, 3, 5,* 1

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada 2 Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada 3 Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada 4 Bio-Medical Imaging and Therapy Facility, Canadian Light Source Inc., University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 5 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada *co-senior authors

§ Corresponding author: Tel: (519)-661-2111 ext. 85683, Fax: (519)-661-2123, email:[email protected]

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Abstract High resolution images are used as a basis for finite-element modeling of the middle-ear structures to study their biomechanical function. Commonly used imaging techniques such as micro-computed tomography (CT) and optical microscopy require extensive sample preparation, processing or staining using contrast agents to achieve sufficient soft-tissue contrast. We compare imaging of middle-ear structures in unstained, non-decalcified human temporal bones using conventional absorption-contrast micro-CT and using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging (SR-PCI). Four cadaveric temporal bones were imaged using SR-PCI and conventional micro-CT. Images were qualitatively compared in terms of visualization of structural details and soft-tissue contrast using intensity profiles and histograms. In order to quantitatively compare SR-PCI to micro-CT, three-dimensional (3D) models of the ossicles were constructed from both modalities using a semi-automatic segmentation method as these structures are clearly visible in both types of images. Volumes of the segmented ossicles were computed and compared between the two imaging modalities and to estimates from the literature. SR-PCI images provided superior visualization of soft-tissue microstructures over conventional micro-CT images. Intensity profiles emphasized the improved contrast and detectability of soft-tissue in SR-PCI in comparison to absorption-contrast micro-CT. In addition, the semi-automatic segmentations of SR-PCI images yielded accurate 3D reconstructions of the ossicles with mean volumes in accord with volume estimates from micro-CT images and literature. Sample segmentations of the ossicles and soft tissue structures were provided on an online data repository for benefit of the research community. The improved visualization, modeling accuracy and simple sample preparation make SR-PCI a promising tool for generating reliable FE models of the middle-ear structures, including both soft tissues and bone.

24 25

Keywords: Micro-computed tomography, synchrotron radiation, phase-contrast imaging, middle ear, soft tissue, image segmentation

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1.

Introduction

27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Finite-element (FE) models are computational models used to simulate and understand the relationship between structure and function of modeled anatomies. FE models of the complex and small middle-ear bones and surrounding soft tissue have been used to study their biomechanical properties (Sun et al., 2002; Decraemer et al., 2003; Huber et al., 2003; Funnell et al., 2005; Homma et al., 2009; Chou et al., 2011; Gan et al., 2011; Zhang and Gan, 2011) and as modeling tools for improving and optimizing middle-ear prostheses (Kelly et al., 2003; Neudert et al., 2007; Gan et al., 2010). Constructing these computational models requires having accurate and realistic representations of the anatomical geometries of the modeled structures.

35 36 37 38

Histological sectioning provides very high resolution anatomical representations, which can be used as the basis for FE modeling of the middle-ear structures (Funnell et al., 1992; Gan et al., 2002, 2004; Sun et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2007). However, challenges of histological sectioning include sample destruction, the risk of structural deformation and long processing time.

39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53

Modern imaging modalities provide an alternative method to obtain anatomical and geometrical representations of the middle-ear structures while overcoming some of the challenges of histological sectioning. Clinical computed tomography (CT) can be used to acquire in-vivo images of the middle ear from patients. Clinical CT was previously used to derive models of the middle ear for finite-element analysis (Lee et al., 2006; Wen et al., 2006; Chou et al., 2011). However, clinical CT images are restricted by low spatial resolution and by radiation dose and exposure time when used to image patients, therefore limiting achievable image quality and contrast resolution. Micro-CT is more commonly used in obtaining models of the middle ear in human (Decraemer et al., 2003; Lane et al., 2004; Homma et al., 2009) and animal (Elkhouri et al., 2006; Tuck-Lee et al., 2008; Puria and Steele, 2010; Buytaert et al., 2011) temporal bones. Micro-CT is characterized by having micrometer-range resolution and the ability to increase beam intensities to improve image contrast. With its micrometer-range resolution, micro-CT is suitable for accurately imaging high-density tissue such as the ossicles and surrounding bone. However, it does not provide sufficient contrast resolution to easily visualize soft tissues such as the tympanic membrane, ligaments and muscles.

54 55 56 57 58 59 60

A number of tissue staining agents have been proposed for contrast-enhancement of the middleear soft tissues when using micro-CT (Metscher, 2009). Phosphotungstic acid has been used to visualize middle-ear geometrical features and to create 3D surface models of the middle-ear soft tissues (Buytaert et al., 2014; De Greef et al., 2015). Iodine potassium iodide was reported to result in significant improvement of contrast of middle-ear soft tissues (Rohani et al., 2016). However, the staining process is time-consuming and may cause tissue shrinkage (Buytaert et al., 2014).

61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68

An alternative approach to staining is combining data from two imaging modalities. Buytaert et al. combined data from high-resolution micro-CT recordings with data from high-resolution orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical-sectioning microscopy (OPFOS) (Buytaert et al., 2011; Maftoon et al., 2015; Motallebzadeh et al., 2017). OPFOS is an optical technique with very high resolution that is used to visualize both soft tissues and bone if the structures can be made transparent (Voie et al., 1993; Buytaert et al., 2012). Achieving the necessary level of transparency can be challenging and requires substantial amount of chemical processing involving decalcification of bone, clearing and staining with fluorescent dye, steps that aid light

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

26

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

transmission and imaging of deeper bone encapsulated tissue (Decraemer et al., 2003). Optical coherence tomography has also been used to produce cross sectional (Park et al., 2003) or 3D images of the middle ear (Pitris et al., 2001; MacDougall et al., 2015). However, similar to OPFOS, OCT can suffer from degraded image quality, and shadowing artifacts due to the attenuation of the optical signal and scattering in non optically transparent structures such as the TM (Pitris et al., 2001).

75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88

Synchrotron radiation (SR)-based X-ray imaging provides coherent collimated X-rays with high photon flux and submicron source stability. These high-energy X-ray beams pass through dense structures easily, making internal structures visible without the need for staining or bone decalcification. SR-CT has been previously used to image middle-ear structures (Vogel and Schmitt, 1998; Vogel, 2000; Neudert et al., 2010; Kanzaki et al., 2011). Kanzaki et al. used SRCT microscopy to study the cartilaginous constitution of auditory ossicles in osteopetrotic mice (Kanzaki et al., 2011). Since SR can provide monochromatic beams, it does not suffer from beam-hardening artifacts, which result from the variations in absorption of photons of different energies in polychromatic beams. Neudert et al. (2010) relied on this advantage of SR microtomography to evaluate the bone-implant contact surface area of stapes and titanium prostheses (Neudert et al., 2010). Vogel et al. used SR-CT to image middle-ear ossicles and reported very good segmentation results because of the high contrast of bone and surrounding air, whereas soft tissues (e.g., tympanic membrane) were much more difficult to segment yielding 3D reconstructions with structural discontinuities (Vogel and Schmitt, 1998).

89 90 91 92 93 94 95

While conventionally, CT imaging is absorption-contrast based, phase-contrast imaging (PCI) can potentially be combined with SR-CT (called “SR-PCI” henceforth), to improve soft-tissue contrast while maintaining accurate visualization of bone. Conventional absorption-contrast based CT depends on the attenuation of X-rays as they traverse the sample, whereas in PCI the phase shift caused by the sample is transformed into detectable variations in X-ray intensity. In addition, PCI can provide edge enhancement by emphasizing the contrast between boundaries of different structures in the image.

96 97 98 99 100 101

In this paper, we present the first use of SR-PCI to image and model the middle-ear structures of unstained, non-decalcified human temporal bone. Our objective is to demonstrate that SR-PCI can be used to improve the visualization of both bone and soft tissue simultaneously while yielding accurate volume estimates of imaged structures. Accurate visualization and modeling of the middle-ear structures is fundamental for generating accurate and reliable FE models used to study its biomechanical response.

102

2.

103

2.1

104 105 106 107 108 109

Four fresh-frozen then fixed adult cadaveric temporal bones were used in this study. All cadaveric specimens were obtained with permission from the body bequeathal program at Western University, London, Ontario, Canada in accordance with the Anatomy Act of Ontario and Western's Committee for Cadaveric Use in Research. Following thawing, a cylindrical cutter was used to core a sample (40 mm diameter and 60 mm length) of the middle ear from each temporal bone.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

69 70 71 72 73 74

Materials and Methods

Temporal bone preparation

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The samples were fixed in a 4F1G (3.7% formaldehyde + 1% gluteraldehyde in phosphate buffer) bath for 5 days. The samples were then rinsed twice and dehydrated using an ethanol series (50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100% and 100%). No additional processing (i.e., staining, sectioning or decalcification) was performed on the samples. Sample fixation eliminated the risk of degradation during the two-month time difference between imaging sessions and during scanning. Samples were transferred to the imaging facilities in motion-proof containers to avoid risk of damage during shipping.

117

2.2

118

2.2.1 SR-PCI imaging

119 120 121 122 123 124

The PCI technique used in this study is in-line PCI, which is similar to the setup used for conventional radiography, is comprised of an X-ray source, a sample, and a detector but no other optical elements are required. However, it differs in that it requires the detector to be placed at a distance from the sample to allow the phase-shifted beam to interfere with the original beam and produce measurable fringes. These fringes correspond to surfaces and structural boundaries of the sample (edge enhancement) compared with a conventional radiogram.

125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142

To acquire the SR-PCI images, each sample was scanned using the Bio-Medical Imaging and Therapy (BMIT) 05ID-2 beamline at the Canadian Light Source Inc. (CLSI) in Saskatoon, SK, Canada. The BMIT 05ID-2 beamline provides an SR beam produced by a superconducting wiggler source (Wysokinski et al., 2015). The beam is filtered using a monochromator and yields an energy bandwidth of ∆E/E = 10-3 over an energy range of 25 – 150 keV. The imaging setup installed at the beamline length of 55 m from source, consists of a sample stage and a chargecoupled-device based detector system both placed on a vibration isolation table. The distance between the sample and detector was set to 2 m and the photon energy was set to 47 keV. Motorized alignment stages were used to align the sample and detector for high resolution tomography. The detector (a beam monitor AA-60 coupled with a camera C9300-124, Hamamatsu Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan) has a 12-bit resolution and an effective pixel size of 9 x 9 µm2. The imaging field of view was set to 4000 x 950 pixels corresponding to 36.0 x 8.6 mm and 3000 projections over 180º rotation were acquired per view. The 3D image volume had an isotropic voxel size of 9 µm. The whole middle-ear region of interest was covered by 2 to 3 fields of view depending on the size of the sample. The acquisition time to capture all projections per view was ~30 minutes. Both flat-field and dark-field corrections (i.e., removal of beamspecific and detector-specific artifacts) were applied during reconstructions. The reconstructed grayscale images were of 12-bit resolution.

143

2.2.2 Conventional micro-CT imaging

144 145 146 147 148 149 150

For comparison, conventional absorption-contrast micro-CT imaging was performed. To acquire conventional micro-CT images, samples were imaged using an eXplore Locus micro-CT scanner (GE Healthcare Biosciences, London, Ontario, Canada) at the Robarts Research Institute, Western University in London, ON. The scanner operated with an X-ray source of 80 kV voltage and a current of 0.45 mA. The source-to-sample distance was 256.03 mm whereas the source-todetector distance was 361.34 mm. The temperature of the whole system was controlled during scanning. The temperature and the moisture level of the fixed samples was controlled by placing

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Experimental setup and image acquisition

RI PT

110 111 112 113 114 115 116

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

them in a plastic container. Using an angular increment of 0.4 degrees, 900 projections were acquired. For each projection, the object was exposed for about 4.5 s per frame and an average of 5 frames was taken to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. There were no overlapping slices in the micro-CT image dataset. The total acquisition time to capture all projections was ~7 hours. A modified cone-beam algorithm (Feldkamp et al., 1984) was used to reconstruct the data into a 3D image volume with an isotropic voxel size of 20 µm. A sub-volume of ~200 slices was selected to span the entire middle ear.

158

2.3

159 160 161 162 163

Prior to segmentation, the SR-PCI and conventional micro-CT images were co-registered to allow for visual and quantitative comparisons. Fiducial-based registration using three landmarks (umbo, lateral process of malleus and short body of incus) placed on the two corresponding images was performed using Fiducial Registration module in the 3D Slicer 4.5 platform (Fedorov et al., 2012).

164 165 166 167 168 169 170

Following co-registration, a semi-automatic segmentation algorithm, “FastGrowCut” (Zhu et al., 2014), was applied to extract models of the ossicles. The FastGrowCut algorithm is a singlethreaded algorithm that uses manually selected pixels as seeds for structures of interest and for background. These seeds are iteratively “grown” to be classified into pixels corresponding to the structures of interest and to background. The segmentation process was performed on a quadcore workstation (Intel Core i7-3930K 3.2GHz, 64 GB RAM and GeForce GTX 970) with a total running time of ~60 minutes for the ossicles.

171 172 173 174 175

The following soft tissue structures: (TM, Incudomalleal joint, Incudostapedial joint, Tensor tympani muscle, Anterior mallear ligament, Lateral mallear ligament, Posterior incudal ligament, Stapedial annular ligament and Stapedius muscle) were segmented using a combination of thresholding followed by manual editing performed using the Editor module in 3D Slicer platform.

176 177 178 179

Although the SR-PCI images allowed for the semi-automated segmentation of the stapes, it was more challenging to completely isolate the stapes in the micro-CT images. Therefore, the 3D models of the incus and malleus only were used for quantitative comparison of the two imaging modalities by calculated their volumes.

180

2.4

181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188

The co-registered SR-PCI and micro-CT volumes of middle-ear bones and soft tissues including membranes, joints, ligaments and muscles were visually compared. Intensity profiles and histograms were computed in order to highlight changes in contrast. Matching SR-PCI and micro-CT images were exported after normalizing their intensities to 0-255 grey-scale levels. The intensity normalization was performed by scaling the full range of intensities in each image while avoiding clipping or saturation of image intensities. This normalization was essential to compare and analyze variations in image intensity by plotting intensity histograms and intensity profiles.

189 190

As noted in the Introduction, SR-PCI results in enhancement of edges, and at the outset, it was not clear if this enhancement affects geometrical properties. Since mass density is an important

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Segmentation and model reconstruction

RI PT

151 152 153 154 155 156 157

AC C

SR-PCI and conventional micro-CT comparison

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

parameter for developing accurate FE models of the middle-ear structures (Abel and Lord, 2001; Koike et al., 2005; Sim and Puria, 2008) and is affected by volume, we evaluated the accuracy of volume estimates derived from segmentations of the SR-PCI images. A preliminary imaging study showed that the edge enhancement effect is more prominent in bones than in soft tissue. Therefore, quantitative comparison was performed by computing the volume of the malleus and incus using the 3D reconstructions from both types of images. Mean volumes and mean absolute differences between volume estimates were computed and compared between the two imaging modalities and to derived values from mass and density estimates in literature: 12.67±1.6 mm3 and 14.10±2.6 mm3 for the malleus and incus, respectively (Sim and Puria, 2008). A power calculation was performed to confirm the suitability of the available sample size of n=4 for statistical comparisons (HyLown LLC, 2017). A 1-sample, 2-sided equality power test was performed using the following values: µ=14, µ 0=12, σ=1.5, n=4, where µ is the mean volume from our preliminary study, µ 0 and σ are a reference mean and standard deviation (Sim and Puria, 2008). The calculated power was ~ 0.8 which justified our sample size for statistical comparisons. Paired Student’s t-tests were also used to compare the computed volumes and p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

207

3.

208

3.1

209 210 211 212 213 214 215

Images of the middle-ear ossicles (malleus, incus and stapes) acquired using SR-PCI and conventional micro-CT are illustrated in Fig. 1. The edge-enhancement provided by SR-PCI provided clearer visualization of structural details of the bones including small processes as shown in Fig. 1a. In addition, the edge-enhancement resulted in brighter borders for high density structures (clearly seen in the malleus and incus in Fig.1a). The effect of this border on the accuracy of the segmentations was evaluated by computing and comparing the volumes of the bones as will be presented in section 3.3.

216 217 218 219 220 221 222

SR-PCI makes soft tissue structures easily discernible in comparison to conventional micro-CT images. The tympanic membrane, chorda tympani (Fig. 2a), stapedius muscle (Fig. 2c) and tensor tympani muscle (Fig. 2d) are clearly seen in SR-PCI images but are faint in corresponding micro-CT images (Fig. 2e, g and h). Other fine structures such as the incudomalleolar joint, lateral malleolar ligament (Fig. 2a), superior malleolar ligament (Fig. 2b), stapes annular ligament, incudostapedial joint (Fig. 2c) are clear in the images acquired using SR-PCI but are completely absent in the micro-CT images (Fig. 2e, f and g).

223

3.2

224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231

The two imaging modalities display bones and soft tissue differently. In absorption-contrast micro-CT images, bones are much brighter than soft tissue whereas in SR-PCI, bones and soft tissue appear to be of similar brightness. This can be seen by comparing the intensities of the two sample images in Fig. 3a and d. The intensity profiles along the dashed lines in the SR-PCI image (Fig. 3a) and micro-CT image (Fig. 3d) running across the tympanic membrane and a section of the incus are plotted in Fig. 3b and e, respectively. A distinct intensity peak (marked by the dashed oval in Fig. 3b) corresponding to the tympanic membrane is found in the SR-PCI profile only. This explains the improved visualization of the soft tissue in SR-PCI images and

Results and Discussion

M AN U

SC

RI PT

191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206

AC C

EP

TE D

Improved visualization of bones and soft tissue

Different intensity mapping of bones and soft tissue

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

supports the usability of this imaging modality to image bones and soft tissue simultaneously. The histograms of the intensities of the two images are shown in Fig. 3c and f. The range of intensities and positions of peaks in the histograms help explain the different intensity mapping of bones and soft-tissue using the two imaging modalities. In the SR-PCI histogram (Fig. 3c) the intensities are distributed over a narrower range of intensities within which the background (i.e. air) is represented by the first peak and the tissue (bones and soft-tissue combined) correspond to the second peak. The histogram from the micro-CT image (Fig. 3f) also includes two peaks, but they are farther away from each other, hence, covering a wider range of intensities. The first peak corresponds to air while the second peak corresponds to bone only, with other tissue (including soft tissue) represented by the intensities in-between the two peaks. This indicates that it can sometimes be more challenging to visually differentiate structures of different densities (e.g. bone and soft tissue) in SR-PCI images than in conventional absorption-contrast CT imaging. Nevertheless, SR-PCI provides improved sensitivity to density variations, and enhanced ability to detect fine edges of structures (Lewis, 2004).

246

3.3

247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256

The high contrast and clear visualization in SR-PCI images allowed very robust and distinct segmentation of the ossicles using the semi-automatic 3D FastGrowCut algorithm. Figure 4 illustrates a sample of the segmentation results using SR-PCI (Fig. 4a) and micro-CT (Fig. 4b) and the corresponding 3D reconstructed model from the SR-PCI image (c). The separation between the malleus and incus was clearer and sharper in the SR-PCI segmentations because of the presence of distinct borders. There was also less colour bleed between the different segmentations. It is also noted that the incus-stapes separation was much more defined in the SRPCI segmentations (Fig. 4a). These segmentations did not require any further manual modifications and indicate that SR-PCI images are very reliable in semi-automatically segmenting adjacent bones.

257 258 259 260 261 262

Similarly, the improved soft-tissue contrast provided segmentations with sharp edges and clear endings for the delicate structures. A sample of the generated colour maps and 3D models of the middle ear soft tissue structures using SR-PCI images is shown in Fig. 5. The colour maps in Fig. 5b illustrate the sharpness of segmenting the ISJ and the adjacent bones (Stapes and Incus). Similarly, Fig. 5c represents a plane through the IMJ, TM and cross sections of AML and PIL and their clear connections to the Malleus and Incus.

263 264 265

A sample of the segmented structures and the corresponding raw images are provided to the research community through an online data repository at: http://abl.uwo.ca/data_repository/middle_ear.html

266

3.4

267 268 269 270 271 272 273

Volume estimates using SR-PCI and micro-CT of all 4 samples are summarized in Table 1. The volume estimates and mean volumes for both malleus and incus using the two imaging modalities were within the range of volumes derived from the literature (12.67 ± 1.6 mm3 for the malleus and 14.10 ± 2.6 mm3 for the incus (Sim and Puria, 2008)). The mean absolute difference in computed volumes using the two imaging modalities was 0.57 mm3 (4.5%) for the malleus and 0.3 mm3 (2.1%) for the incus. These small variations were not significantly different (p=0.54 and p=0.89). This further emphasizes the negligible effect of the enhanced borders of the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

Segmentation and 3D model reconstructions

SC

RI PT

232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245

Quantitative comparison of SR-PCI and conventional micro-CT

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

bones on volume estimates. Note that a comparison to the volumes reported by Sim and Puria (2008) is justified as their micro-CT images have approximately the same spatial resolution as our SR-PCI data.

277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285

The edge enhancement provided by the phase-contrast method and the depth of penetration provided by synchrotron radiation makes SR-PCI images sharper than corresponding conventional micro-CT images that have the same spatial resolution. Indeed, the two imaging modalities used in this work had similar spatial resolutions of approximately 20 µm. Higher spatial resolutions can still be achieved with SR-PCI and is the focus of on-going investigation. The edge-sharpening capability of SR-PCI allows it to depict bones as well as boundaries of fine soft tissues such as the tympanic membrane, ligaments, muscles, joints and their points of contact to adjacent structures (Fig. 2). This edge-enhancement-based visualization is not attainable in corresponding absorption-contrast micro-CT images.

286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297

With the remarkable improvement of soft-tissue contrast provided by phase-contrast imaging, more research groups are recently experimenting integrating phase-contrast imaging in commercial lab-based micro-CT systems (Wilkins et al., 1996; Pfeiffer et al., 2006; Tuohimaa et al., 2007; Bartels et al., 2013; Bidola et al., 2017). One of the main challenges with phasecontrast imaging is that it requires a highly monochromatic beam (achievable using synchrotron radiation imaging) and sophisticated X-ray optics which restricts its integrations with commonly available polychromatic CT systems (Wilkins et al., 1996). Methods to overcome these challenges require special setups or designing customized X-ray systems such as using nanometric phase gratings (Miao et al., 2015), liquid-metal-jet microfocus sources (Tuohimaa et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2013) or laser plasma-based Xray sources (Kincaid, 2010). These methods are still in the development phase, therefore limiting their application to imaging a wide range ear structures that would benefit from the improved soft-tissue contrast.

298 299 300 301 302 303 304

A comparable level of realistic visualization was only reported in studies involving the use of staining (De Greef et al., 2015; Rohani et al., 2016); higher resolution systems (Sim and Puria, 2008; Puria and Steele, 2010), which require further reduction of samples sizes to fit small sample holders; or combining micro-CT imaging with OPFOS (Buytaert et al., 2011), which requires elaborate specimen preparation to make specimens transparent. SR-PCI achieves comparable and possibly higher contrast visualization in lieu of further processing or dissection of temporal bones.

305

4.

306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313

Synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging can be used as a tool to improve visualization of middle-ear bones and soft tissues simultaneously without the need for staining, decalcification, or excessive sample size reduction. It enhances edges of structures allowing the detection of fine soft-tissue structures such as ligaments and joints. This edge enhancement also makes semiautomatic segmentation of structures possible without compromising the accuracy of volume representations of structures. Combining the achievable visualization quality and modeling accuracy with ease of sample preparation makes SR-PCI a promising tool for generating reliable FE models to study biomechanical properties of the middle-ear components.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

274 275 276

AC C

Conclusion

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

5.

Acknowledgements

315 316 317 318 319 320 321

Financial support for Mai Elfarnawany, Ph.D. was provided by a MITACS Accelerate postdoctoral internship (number: IT04392), Canada. Part of the research described in this paper was performed at the BMIT facility at the Canadian Light Source, which is funded by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the National Research Council Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Government of Saskatchewan, Western Economic Diversification Canada, and the University of Saskatchewan.

322

6.

323 324 325

Abel, E.W., Lord, R.M., 2001. A finite-element model for evaluation of middle ear mechanics. 2001 Conf. Proc. 23rd Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2, 1–4. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1020651

326 327 328

Bartels, M., Hernandez, V.H., Krenkel, M., Moser, T., Salditt, T., 2013. Phase contrast tomography of the mouse cochlea at microfocus x-ray sources. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 1–5. doi:10.1063/1.4818737

329 330 331 332

Bidola, P., Morgan, K., Willner, M., Fehringer, A., Allner, S., Prade, F., Pfeiffer, F., Achterhold, K., 2017. Application of sensitive, high-resolution imaging at a commercial lab-based X-ray micro-CT system using propagation-based phase retrieval. J. Microsc. 266, 211–220. doi:10.1111/jmi.12530

333 334 335

Buytaert, J.A.N., Descamps, E., Adriaens, D., Dirckx, J.J.J., 2012. The OPFOS Microscopy Family: High-Resolution Optical Sectioning of Biomedical Specimens. Anat. Res. Int. 2012, 206238. doi:10.1155/2012/206238

336 337 338

Buytaert, J.A.N., Salih, W.H.M., Dierick, M., Jacobs, P., Dirckx, J.J.J., 2011. Realistic 3D computer model of the gerbil middle ear, featuring accurate morphology of bone and soft tissue structures. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 12, 681–696. doi:10.1007/s10162-011-0281-4

339 340 341

Buytaert, J., Goyens, J., De Greef, D., Aerts, P., Dirckx, J., 2014. Volume shrinkage of bone, brain and muscle tissue in sample preparation for micro-CT and light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM). Microsc. Microanal. 20, 1208–17. doi:10.1017/S1431927614001329

342 343

Chou, C.-F., Yu, J.-F., Chen, C.-K., 2011. The Natural Vibration Characteristics of Human Ossicles. Chang Gung Med J 34, 160–5.

344 345 346

De Greef, D., Buytaert, J.A.N., Aerts, J.R.M., Van Hoorebeke, L., Dierick, M., Dirckx, J., 2015. Details of human middle ear morphology based on micro-CT imaging of phosphotungstic acid stained samples. J. Morphol. 276, 1025–1046. doi:10.1002/jmor.20392

347 348 349

Decraemer, W.F., Dirckx, J.J.J., Funnell, A.W.R.J., 2003. Three-Dimensional Modelling of the Middle-Ear Ossicular Chain Using a Commercial High-Resolution X-Ray CT Scanner. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4, 250–263. doi:10.1007/s10162-002-3030-x

350 351

Elkhouri, N., Liu, H., Robert, A.W., Funnell, J., 2006. Low-Frequency Finite-Element Modeling of the Gerbil Middle Ear. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 7, 399–411. doi:10.1007/s10162-006-

RI PT

314

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

References

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

352

0055-6 Fedorov, A., Beichel, R., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Finet, J., Fillion-Robin, J.C., Pujol, S., Bauer, C., Jennings, D., Fennessy, F., Sonka, M., Buatti, J., Aylward, S., Miller, J. V., Pieper, S., Kikinis, R., 2012. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30, 1323–1341. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001

357 358

Feldkamp, L. a., Davis, L.C., Kress, J.W., 1984. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 612--619. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612

359 360

Funnell, W.R., Khanna, S.M., Decraemer, W.F., 1992. On the degree of rigidity of the manubrium in a finite-element model of the cat eardrum. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2082–90.

361 362 363

Funnell, W.R.J., Heng Siah, T., McKee, M.D., Daniel, S.J., Decraemer, W.F., 2005. On the coupling between the incus and the stapes in the cat. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6, 9–18. doi:10.1007/s10162-004-5016-3

364 365 366

Gan, R.Z., Dai, C., Wang, X., Nakmali, D., Wood, M.W., 2010. A totally implantable hearing system – Design and function characterization in 3D computational model and temporal bones. Hear. Res. 263, 138–144. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.09.003

367 368 369

Gan, R.Z., Feng, B., Sun, Q., 2004. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of human ear for sound transmission. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 847–859. doi:10.1023/B:ABME.0000030260.22737.53

370 371 372

Gan, R.Z., Sun, Q., Dyer, R.K., Chang, K.-H., Dormer, K.J., 2002. Three-dimensional modeling of middle ear biomechanics and its applications. Otol. Neurotol. 23, 271–280. doi:10.1097/00129492-200205000-00008

373 374

Gan, R.Z., Yang, F., Zhang, X., Nakmali, D., 2011. Mechanical properties of stapedial annular ligament. Med. Eng. Phys. 33, 330–339. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.022

375 376 377

Homma, K., Du, Y., Shimizu, Y., Puria, S., 2009. Ossicular resonance modes of the human middle ear for bone and air conduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 968–79. doi:10.1121/1.3056564

378 379 380

Huber, A., Koike, T., Wada, H., Nandapalan, V., Fisch, U., 2003. Fixation of the anterior mallear ligament: diagnosis and consequences for hearing results in stapes surgery. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 112, 348–55.

381 382 383 384

HyLown LLC, 2017. Test 1 Mean 1-Sample, 2-Sided Equality | Power and Sample Size Calculators | HyLown [WWW Document]. URL http://powerandsamplesize.com/Calculators/Test-1-Mean/1-Sample-Equality (accessed 5.9.17).

385 386 387

Kanzaki, S., Takada, Y., Niida, S., Takeda, Y., Udagawa, N., Ogawa, K., Nango, N., Momose, A., Matsuo, K., 2011. Impaired Vibration of Auditory Ossicles in Osteopetrotic Mice. Am. J. Pathol. 178, 1270–1278. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.063

388 389 390

Kelly, D.J., Prendergast, P.J., Blayney, A.W., 2003. The effect of prosthesis design on vibration of the reconstructed ossicular chain: a comparative finite element analysis of four prostheses. Otol. Neurotol. 24, 11–9.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

353 354 355 356

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Kincaid, R., 2010. Exploration of in-vivo phase-contrast micro-computed tomography with a laser plasma-based x-ray source. Phys. - Diss.

393 394 395

Koike, T., Shinozaki, M., Murakami, S., Homma, K., Kobayashi, T., Wada, H., 2005. Effects of Individual Differences in Size and Mobility of the Middle Ear on Hearing. JSME Int. J. Ser. C 48, 521–528. doi:10.1299/jsmec.48.521

396 397 398

Lane, J.I., Witte, R.J., Driscoll, C.L.W., Camp, J.J., Robb, R.A., 2004. Imaging microscopy of the middle and inner ear: Part I: CT microscopy. Clin. Anat. 17, 607–12. doi:10.1002/ca.20059

399 400 401 402

Lee, C.-F., Chen, P.-R., Lee, W.-J., Chen, J.-H., Liu, T.-C., 2006. Three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of middle ear biomechanics by high-resolution computed tomography and finite element analysis. Laryngoscope 116, 711–6. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000204758.15877.34

403 404

Lewis, R.A., 2004. Medical phase contrast x-ray imaging: current status and future prospects. Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 3573–3583. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/16/005

405 406 407

MacDougall, D., Rainsbury, J., Brown, J., Bance, M., Adamson, R., 2015. Optical coherence tomography system requirements for clinical diagnostic middle ear imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 20, 56008. doi:10.1117/1.JBO.20.5.056008

408 409 410

Maftoon, N., Funnell, W.R.J., Daniel, S.J., Decraemer, W.F., 2015. Finite-Element Modelling of the Response of the Gerbil Middle Ear to Sound. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 16, 547–67. doi:10.1007/s10162-015-0531-y

411 412 413

Metscher, B.D., 2009. MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol. 9. doi:10.1186/1472-6793-9-11

414 415 416

Miao, H., Gomella, A.A., Harmon, K.J., Bennett, E.E., Chedid, N., Znati, S., Panna, A., Foster, B.A., Bhandarkar, P., Wen, H., 2015. Enhancing Tabletop X-Ray Phase Contrast Imaging with Nano-Fabrication. Sci. Rep. 5, 13581. doi:10.1038/srep13581

417 418 419

Motallebzadeh, H., Maftoon, N., Pitaro, J., Funnell, W.R.J., Daniel, S.J., 2017. Finite-Element Modelling of the Acoustic Input Admittance of the Newborn Ear Canal and Middle Ear. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 18, 25–48. doi:10.1007/s10162-016-0587-3

420 421 422

Neudert, M., Beleites, T., Ney, M., Kluge, A., Lasurashvili, N., Bornitz, M., Scharnweber, D., Zahnert, T., 2010. Osseointegration of titanium prostheses on the stapes footplate. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11, 161–71. doi:10.1007/s10162-009-0202-y

423 424 425 426

Neudert, M., Berner, M., Bornitz, M., Beleites, T., Ney, M., Zahnert, T., 2007. Osseointegration of prostheses on the stapes footplate: evaluation of the biomechanical feasibility by using a finite element model. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8, 411–21. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-00947

427 428 429 430

Park, J., Cheng, J.T., Ferguson, D., Maguluri, G., Chang, E.W., Clancy, C., Lee, D.J., Iftimia, N., Liu, 14 L, Gardecki, J.A., Nadkarni, S.K., Toussaint, J.D., Yagi, Y., Bouma, B.E., Tearney, G.J., 2003. Investigation of middle ear anatomy and function with combined video otoscopy-phase sensitive OCT. J. Audiol. Fam. Physician Am. Fam. Physician Rev. Med.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

391 392

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

431

Suisse J. Shanks J. Schohet 17, 1093–1108. doi:10.1364/BOE.7.000238 Pfeiffer, F., Weitkamp, T., Bunk, O., David, C., 2006. Phase retrieval and differential phasecontrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources. Nat. Phys. 2, 258–261. doi:10.1038/nphys265

435 436 437

Pitris, C., Saunders, K.T., Fujimoto, J.G., Brezinski, M.E., JG, F., ME, B., 2001. HighResolution Imaging of the Middle Ear With Optical Coherence Tomography. Arch. Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 127, 637. doi:10.1001/archotol.127.6.637

438 439 440

Puria, S., Steele, C., 2010. Tympanic-membrane and malleus–incus-complex co- adaptations for high-frequency hearing in mammals. Hear. Res. 263, 183–190. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.013

441 442 443

Rohani, S.A., Ghomashchi, S., Umoh, J., Holdsworth, D.W., Agrawal, S.K., Ladak, H.M., 2016. Efficacy of Iodine Potassium Iodide as a Contrast Agent for Micro-Computed Tomography of the Human Middle Ear. J. Microsc. in press.

444 445

Sim, J.H., Puria, S., 2008. Soft tissue morphometry of the malleus-incus complex from micro-CT imaging. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9, 5–21. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0103-x

446 447 448

Sun, Q., Gan, R.Z., Chang, K.-H., Dormer, K.J., 2002. Computer-integrated finite element modeling of human middle ear. Biomechan Model Mechanobiol 1, 109–122. doi:10.1007/s10237-002-0014-z

449 450 451

Tuck-Lee, J.P., Pinsky, P.M., Steele, C.R., Puria, S., 2008. Finite element modeling of acoustomechanical coupling in the cat middle ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 348–362. doi:10.1121/1.2912438

452 453

Tuohimaa, T., Otendal, M., Hertz, H.M., 2007. Phase-contrast x-ray imaging with a liquid-metaljet-anode microfocus source. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 74104. doi:10.1063/1.2769760

454 455 456 457

Vogel, U., 2000. 3D-imaging of internal temporal bone structures for ge- ometric modelling of the human hearing organ., in: Wada H, Takasaka T, Ikeda K, Ohyama K, Koike T, Recent Developments in Auditory Mechanics: World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, pp. 44–50.

458 459 460

Vogel, U., Schmitt, T., 1998. 3D visualization of middle ear structures, in: Kim, Y., Mun, S.K. (Eds.), SPIE Med. Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 141–151. doi:10.1117/12.312487

461 462 463

Voie, A.H., Burns, D.H., Spelman, F.A., 1993. Orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning: Three-dimensional imaging of macroscopic biological specimens. J. Microsc. 170, 229– 236. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03346.x

464 465 466

Wang, X., Cheng, T., Gan, R.Z., 2007. Finite-element analysis of middle-ear pressure effects on static and dynamic behavior of human ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 906–17. doi:10.1121/1.2749417

467 468

Wen, Y.-H., Hsu, L.-P., Chen, P.-R., Lee, C.-F., 2006. Design Optimization of Cartilage Myringoplasty using Finite Element Analysis. Tzu Chi Med J 18.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

432 433 434

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Wilkins, S.W., Gureyev, T.E., Gao, D., Pogany, A., Stevenson, A.W., 1996. Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X-rays. Nature 384, 335–338. doi:10.1038/384335a0

471 472 473

Wysokinski, T.W., Chapman, D., Adams, G., Renier, M., Suortti, P., Thomlinson, W., 2015. Beamlines of the biomedical imaging and therapy facility at the Canadian light source – part 3. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. A 775, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2014.11.088

474 475 476

Zhang, X., Gan, R.Z., 2011. Experimental measurement and modeling analysis on mechanical properties of incudostapedial joint. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 10, 713–26. doi:10.1007/s10237-010-0268-9

477 478 479

Zhou, T., Lundström, U., Thüring, T., Rutishauser, S., Larsson, D.H., Stampanoni, M., David, C., Hertz, H.M., Burvall1, A., 2013. Comparison of two x-ray phase-contrast imaging methods with a microfocus source. Opt. Express 21, 30183–30195.

480 481 482 483

Zhu, L., Kolesov, I., Gao, Y., Kikinis, R., Tannenbaum, A., 2014. An Effective Interactive Medical Image Segmentation Method Using Fast GrowCut, in: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Interactive Medical Image Computing Workshop.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

469 470

484

AC C

EP

TE D

485

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure Captions

487 488 489 490 491

Fig. 1 Comparison of middle-ear ossicle visualization using SR-PCI and conventional micro-CT. Malleus, incus and stapes are clearer and have more structural details in SR-PCI images (a) and (b) than in the corresponding micro-CT images (c) and (d). Edge enhancement provided by SRPCI allows clear visualization of internal structural details (white arrows in (a)). Corresponding images were captured from co-registered images of the same sample.

RI PT

486

492

SC

Fig. 2 Improved soft-tissue visualization in SR-PCI images over conventional micro-CT images. Sample SR-PCI images show soft tissues such as tympanic membrane (TM), chorda tympani (Ct), incudomalleolar joint (IMJ), lateral malleolar ligament (LML) in (a), superior malleolar ligament (SML) in (b), stapes annular ligament (SAL), incudostapedial joint (ISJ), stapedius muscle (SM) in (c) and tensor tympani muscle (TTM) in (d) that are depicted with higher contrast than in the corresponding conventional micro-CT images (e), (f), (g) and (h). Corresponding images were captured from co-registered images of the same sample.

M AN U

493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500

513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525

TE D

EP

512

Fig. 3 Differences between SR-PCI and conventional micro-CT image intensities. The Intensity profiles along the dashed lines in (a) and (d) running across the tympanic membrane and a section of the incus are shown in (b) and (e). In addition to the main peak corresponding to the bone (between 0.4-0.5 cm), a distinct peak (dashed circle in (b)) corresponds to the tympanic membrane and cannot be seen in (e) indicating improved visualization of soft tissue in SR-PCI images. Intensity histograms (c) and (f) show two peaks. In SR-PCI (c), the first peak (air) is close to the second peak (tissue: bone and soft tissue combined) whereas in micro-CT (f), there is a wider distribution of intensities separating other tissue (including soft tissue) from bone peak. This indicates the lower sensitivity of SR-PCI in distinguishing structures of different intensities while improving contrast by detecting their fine edges. Corresponding images were captured from co-registered images of the same sample.

Fig. 4 A sample of the segmentation results using SR-PCI (a) and absorption-contrast micro-CT (b) and the corresponding 3D reconstructed model from SR-PCI is shown in (c). SR-PCI segmentations (a) showed clearer separation between the malleus and incus. The incus-stapes separation was also more defined in (a) than (b). Corresponding images were captured from coregistered images of the same sample.

AC C

501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511

Fig. 5 A sample of the segmentation results of soft tissue structures from SR-PCI images. (a) illustrates all 9 segmented soft tissue structures: (tympanic membrane (TM), tensor tympani muscle (TTM), incudostapedial joint (ISJ), stapedial annular ligament (SAL), stapedius muscle (SM), posterior incudal ligament (PIL), incudomalleolar joint (IMJ), lateral malleolar ligament (LML) and anterior mallear ligament (AML)) and their connections to the three ossicles: (malleus, incus and stapes). (b) a sample plane through the generated colour maps illustrating the sharpness of segmenting the ISJ and the adjacent bones (stapes and incus). (c) represents a plane 15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

526 527

through colour maps showing the IMJ, TM and cross sections of AML and PIL and their clear connections to the malleus and incus.

528

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

529

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

530

Table 1: Volume Estimates of Malleus and Incus from SR-PCI, Micro-CT Images and Literature Malleus (mm3) Ear 1

Ear 2 Ear 3

Mean ± std

Ear 1

Ear 2

SR-PCI

14.33

11.77 12.46 11.92 12.62 ± 1.2

16.03

13.31 13.02 14.29 14.16 ± 1.4

Micro-CT

13.95

11.47 13.14 11.02 12.40 ± 1.4

16.40

13.15 13.19 13.79 14.13 ± 1.5

Abs. Difference

0.38

0.30 0.68

0.37

0.16

0.57 ± 0.28

Ear 4

Mean ± std

RI PT

0.90

Ear 3

0.17

0.50

0.3 ± 1.1

SC

Literature (Derived from Sim and Puria, 2008)

Ear 4

Incus (mm3)

14.10 ± 2.6

M AN U

12.67 ± 1.6

AC C

EP

TE D

531

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Table 1: Volume Estimates of Malleus and Incus from SR-PCI, Micro-CT Images and Literature Malleus (mm3) Ear 1

Ear 2 Ear 3

Mean ± std

Ear 1

Ear 2

SR-PCI

14.33

11.77 12.46 11.92 12.62 ± 1.2

16.03

13.31 13.02 14.29 14.16 ± 1.4

Micro-CT

13.95

11.47 13.14 11.02 12.40 ± 1.4

16.40

13.15 13.19 13.79 14.13 ± 1.5

Abs. Difference

0.38

0.30 0.68

0.37

0.16

0.57 ± 0.28

Ear 4

Mean ± std

RI PT

0.90

Ear 3

0.17

0.50

0.3 ± 1.1

SC

Literature (Derived from Sim and Puria, 2008)

Ear 4

Incus (mm3)

14.10 ± 2.6

M AN U

12.67 ± 1.6

AC C

EP

TE D

2

1

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights:

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Synchrotron-radiation phase contrast imaging is proposed for middle-ear imaging It provides superior visualization of microstructures over conventional micro-CT It is an improved tool to visualize middle-ear bones and soft tissue simultaneously These improvements are achieved without the need for staining or decalcification It is a promising tool for generating reliable FE models of the middle-ear structures

AC C