274
273 EFFECT OF PELVIC MUSCLE EXERCISES BIOFEEDBACK STIMULATION AND PROSTATECTOMY Wille Sebastian, Rainer Department
Sobottka
Axel, Varga Zoltan,
of Urology, Philipps-University
WITH ELECTRICAL AFTER RADICAL
Heidenreich
Axel, Hofmann
of Marburg, Marbug.
RADICAL
PROSTATECTOMY:
ACCORDING
LOCATION
TO SURGICAL
Salomon
Laurent’.
Antony’,
Chopin Dominique’,
Levrel
OF SURGICAL
MARGINS
APPROACH
Olivier’,
Saint Fabien’,
Hoznek
And&‘,
Cicco
Abbou Claude’
Germany
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: To asses the effectiveness of pelvic muscle exercises (PME) and electrical stimulation (ES) and biofeedback (BFB) on urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). MATERIALS & METHODS: We randomised 139 patients who underwent RRP into 3 groups: Group I received verbal and written instruction about postoperative PME from a physiotherapist. Group 2 received same instructions and electrical stimulation for I5 minutes twice a day. Patients in group 3 were additionally treated with BFB for I5 minutes twice a day. Treatment was started immediately after catheter removal and performed for three months. Outcome was assessed using the 20 minutes pad test. a urine symptom inventory, all obtained preoperative and three months postoperative. Surgery was performed by two surgeons only. Results at three months were available for 120 (symptom inventory) and 79 patients (padtest) respectively.
‘Urologic,
CHU H Mondor.
Creteil,
France.
‘Pathologic,
CHU H Mondor,
Creteil, France
INTRODUCTION
& OBJECTIVES:
margins after retropubic.
MATERIALS by retropubic
approach)
To compare
perineal and laparoscopic
& METHODS: approach.
were analysed
484 specimen
I I9 by perineal
the location
of surgical
radical prostatectomy
of radical prostatectomies
approach
(145
and 220 by laparoscopic
in terms of the location of positive surgical margins
and its rate.
RESULTS: treatment
RESULTS:
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
PME
PME+ES
PME+ES+BFB
Group I vs. 2
and
3 not simificant
Group 2 vs. 3 not sismficant
Overall subjective continence at 3 months (questionnaire)
357~ (n=42)
60%
Overall objective at 3 months (padtest)
66.7% (~27)
For pT2 tumours, surgical positive margin rates were 18,8%, 15%
and 16%. Location
was at apex in 47.1%. 33% and 52%. at bladder neck in
41.2% 41.6% and 20% and posterolateral
(w40)
52.6%
turnouts,
(~38)
positive surgical
in ll.8%,
margin rate was 54.98,
25% et 28%. For pT3
30.3% and 46%, Location
was at apex in 38.2%. 50% and 44%. at bladder neck in 44.1%, 25% and 22.2%, 76% (Il=L?S)
posterolateral
76% (n=25)
in 17.6%, 25% and 33.3%
continence
CONCLUSION: CONCLUSION: A treatment program of electrical stimulation or biofeedback enhanced pelvic floor exercises began immediately after catheter removal did not significantly affect continence after three months in this study.
remains
After comparing
the highest
risk among
several approaches, the retropubic
apical surgical
and laparoscopic
approach,
whereas bladder neck involvement is mostly seen in perineal approach.
275 RADICAL
PROSTATECTOMY
LAPAROSCOPIC:
MORBIDITY
Salomon
Saint
Laurent,
Dominique.
BY RETROPUBIC,
Fabien,
Hoanek
And&,
PERINEAL
Cicco
Antony,
AND
Chopin
Abbou Claude
margin
276 IMPROVED URINARY CONTINENCE IN RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY AFTER PREPARATION OF A LONG INTRAPROSTATIC URETERAL STUMP - RESULTS OF A QUESTIONNAIRE IN 575 CONSECUTIVE CASES van Randenboreh Hartung Rudolf
Heinz,
Paul
Roger.
Frischholz
Margret,
Jtirgen
Breul.
Urology, TU Munich, Munich, Germany Urologie, CHU H Mondor, Creteil. France
INTRODUCTION performed
& OBJECTIVES:
by retropubic,
compared
morbidity
MATERIALS
& METHODS:
were performed
Radical
and
prostatectomy
laparoscopic
can
approach.
be
We have
of these 3 approaches.
From 1988 to 2000,401
for localised prostate cancer,
by perineal approach, rate, medical
perineal
137 laparoscopic
and surgical
145 by retropubic
approach.
complications,
radical prostatectomies
Operating
approach,
I I9
time, transfusion
bladder catheterisation
and hospital
stay were noted
RESULTS: operating
Respectively
for retropubic,
perineal
and laparoscopie
time was 197 mn, 178 mn and 285 mn, transfusion
15.9% and 2.9%, medical complications complications
approach,
rate was 26.2%,
rate was 8.3%. 5.9%. 5.1% and surgical
rate was 13.1%, 7.5%. 7.30/c, bladder catheterisation
was 15.9
days,] I .9 days, 6.9 days, hospital stay was13 days. X.7 days and 5.4 days.
CONCLUSION: radical
Improvement
prostatectomy
of surgical
with a decreasing
operative
time,
advantages
of the laparoscopic
laparoscopic
procedure approach.
techniques
morbidity offers
allows
performing
rate. In spite of its higher identical
results
with
the
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Urinary contmence is one of the most important factors of quality of life in patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy. In the literature the achieved continence rates are between 75% and 97% of all patients. To improve the rate of full continence in our patients we used a careful preparation of the intraprostatic part of the uretera to obtain a long ureteral stump for the vesico- urethral anastomosis since June 1997. Before this time, the urethra has been transsected at the apex of the prostate. This study was performed to compare the rate of urinary continence as well as positive surgical margins in these two groups. MATERIALS & METHODS: 156 patients with (group I) and 419 patients without (group 2) a long intraprostatic stump of the urethra were asked by a questionnaire about their continence status. All patients have been fully continent before the operation. The status was defined as continent, if the patient did not use any pads, as stress-incontinent I” (SIK) in the case of I pad. as SIK II” in the case of 2-3 pads and SIK III” if the patient needs more than 3 pads and/or more than I pad at night. The rate of positive surgical margins in the histopathological results was compared. The mean follow-up for group I is 2.5 years and for group 2 4.5 years. RESULTS: Full contmence (no pads) was achieved in 93% of all patients in group I and in 82% in group 2. Stress-incontinence (SIK) I” was found in 4.5% and 12.2% respectiveley. SIK II” was noted in 2.5% and S.6% and complete incontinence was seen in no patient in group I but in I .8% in group 2. This difference is statistically highly significant (p
Urology Supplements
1 (2002)
No. 1, pp. 71