In vitro interaction of Candida tropicalis biofilm formed on catheter with human cells

In vitro interaction of Candida tropicalis biofilm formed on catheter with human cells

Accepted Manuscript In vitro interaction of Candida tropicalis biofilm formed on catheter with human cells Francieli Capote-Bonato, Karina Mayumi Saki...

6MB Sizes 0 Downloads 19 Views

Accepted Manuscript In vitro interaction of Candida tropicalis biofilm formed on catheter with human cells Francieli Capote-Bonato, Karina Mayumi Sakita, Admilton Gonçalves de Oliveira, Junior, Patrícia de Souza Bonfim-Mendonça, Leandro Zuccolotto Crivellenti, Melyssa Negri, Terezinha Inez Estivalet Svidzinski PII:

S0882-4010(18)30774-5

DOI:

10.1016/j.micpath.2018.09.029

Reference:

YMPAT 3179

To appear in:

Microbial Pathogenesis

Received Date: 2 May 2018 Revised Date:

14 August 2018

Accepted Date: 15 September 2018

Please cite this article as: Capote-Bonato F, Sakita KM, de Oliveira Junior AdmiltonGonç, BonfimMendonça PatríSouza, Crivellenti LZ, Negri M, Estivalet Svidzinski TI, In vitro interaction of Candida tropicalis biofilm formed on catheter with human cells, Microbial Pathogenesis (2018), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.09.029. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

In vitro interaction of Candida tropicalis biofilm formed on catheter with human

2

cells

3

Francieli Capote-Bonato1, Karina Mayumi Sakita1, Admilton Gonçalves de Oliveira

5

Junior2, Patrícia de Souza Bonfim-Mendonça1, Leandro Zuccolotto Crivellenti3,

6

Melyssa Negri1, Terezinha Inez Estivalet Svidzinski1*.

7

RI PT

4

1

Department of Clinical Analysis (DCA), State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

9

2

Department of Microbiology (DM), State University of Londrina, Paraná, Brazil

10

3

Department of Animal Science (DAS), Franca University, São Paulo, Brazil

M AN U

SC

8

11 12 13

TE D

14 15 16

19

AC C

18

EP

17

20

* Corresponding author: Terezinha Inez Estivalet Svidzinski

21

Divisão de Micologia Médica – Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Biomedicina –

22

Universidade Estadual de Maringá – Paraná - Brazil. Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP: 87020-

23

900, Maringá, PR., Brazil. Phone: +55 44 3011-4809. Fax: +55 44 3011-4860. E-mail:

24

[email protected]

25

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 26

Abstract

27

Candida tropicalis has emerged as one of the major Candida non-C. albicans

29

species, in terms of epidemiology and virulence. Despite its virulence, C. tropicalis

30

pathogenic mechanism has yet not been fully defined. The current study aimed to

31

demonstrate the interaction of mature C. tropicalis ATCC 750 biofilm formed on

32

catheter with different human cell lines. In vitro mature (72 h) C. tropicalis biofilms

33

were produced on small catheter fragments (SCF) and were mainly composed by

34

blastoconidia. Then, migration of yeast cells from mature biofilm to human cell surfaces

35

(HeLa and HUVEC) was investigated. After contact with both cell lines, the surface of

36

SCF, containing mature C. tropicalis biofilm, exhibited predominantly the filamentous

37

form. Meanwhile, fresh biofilm formed on human cell surfaces also revealed mainly of

38

blastoconidia involved by extracellular matrix. Total biomass and metabolic activity

39

from the remaining biofilm on SCF surface, after direct contact with human cells,

40

exhibited a significant reduction. Mature C. tropicalis biofilm modified its extracellular

41

matrix components, after contact with human cells. Thus, we described for the first time

42

an easy and simple in vitro model with catheter, which could be a powerful tool for

43

future studies that desires to elucidate the mechanisms involved in C. tropicalis biofilm.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

44

RI PT

28

45

Keywords

46

Candida tropicalis; virulence; catheter; biofilm; yeast-hyphal transition.

47 48 49 50

1. Introduction

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

In the latest decades, the number of opportunistic fungal infections caused by

52

Candida species remains high in humans [1]. Candidemia is the main invasive fungal

53

disease among hospitalized patients and the frequency of Candida non-C. albicans

54

(CNCA) species as causative agent has increased [2]. For this reason, current research

55

interest involves the understanding and characterization of emerging CNCA species.

RI PT

51

In terms of epidemiology and virulence, C. tropicalis appears as the second most

57

frequently isolated species of CNCA in South America and Asia and the third most

58

commonly isolated in the USA and Europe [3–7]. In particular, infections by C.

59

tropicalis are frequent in cancer patients and associated with a higher mortality rate [8].

SC

56

An important step for a successful colonization and infection depends essentially

61

on the ability of the pathogen to adhere and form biofilm to host surfaces [9–11].

62

Biofilm is a microbial community attached to biological or inert surfaces, such as

63

medical devices, embedded by extracellular polymeric substances, composed by

64

carbohydrates, hexosamines, uronic acids, proteins and nucleic acids [12,13]. Biofilms

65

are assumed to be the most important virulence factor for pathogenicity in Candida

66

species [12]. The ability to produce biofilms is developed by microorganisms in order to

67

protect themselves against host defense mechanisms and antifungal drugs. Therefore,

68

biofilm formation plays an important role as a virulence factor, which contributes to the

69

pathogenesis of candidiasis. Most of our knowledge related to fungal biofilm formation

70

is based on studies carried out in C. albicans. Recently, investigations showed that C.

71

tropicalis is a strong biofilm producer [9,14]. Despite that, several biological

72

mechanisms involved in C. tropicalis biofilm formation are not yet fully understood.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

60

73

Since C. tropicalis is able to colonize and infect several human anatomically

74

distinct sites [10], it is possible that these yeast cells could damage or compromise the

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 75

function of internal organs, such as bladder, kidneys and blood vessels, by their ability

76

to form biofilms on biotic and abiotic surfaces (medical devices, such as catheters). C. tropicalis cells also have the ability to detached from biofilms and colonize

78

human cells causing injury and reduction of cellular metabolic activity [15]. However,

79

studies involving biofilms, pre-formed on catheters, and their interaction with animal

80

cells are still limited.

RI PT

77

Different methods may be used to investigate biofilm formation and its behavior.

82

These methods include crystal violet staining, 2,3-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5- sulphophenyl)-

83

5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) reduction assay and

84

scanning electronic microscopy

85

investigate yeast catheter-associated infections are limited. Most recently, a successful

86

catheter-associated biofilm infection induced in a murine model investigated different

87

aspects of candiduria [17]. However, it is still not clear whether yeast biofilm cells

88

suffer alterations due to the contact to host cells. Thus, the present study used a simple

89

and easy-to-execute method to evaluate the interaction between C. tropicalis biofilm

90

organized in a piece of catheter with two different human cell lines.

93 94 95

M AN U

TE D

EP

92

[10,14,16]. Both in vitro and in vivo models to

2. Materials and Methods

AC C

91

SC

81

All the necessary steps to investigate the maturity of C. tropicalis biofilm

96

formed on a fragment of catheter and the in vitro biofilm-dynamics to interact with

97

human cells are shown in the flowchart (Fig. 1).

98 99

2.1. Catheter for biofilm formation

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 100 101

In order to obtain C. tropicalis biofilms, sterile polyurethane catheters (24G,

102

Safelet Cath®, Nipro Medical Industries, Ltd., Japan), were aseptically cut into small

103

fragments (0.5 cm) and designated as SCF.

105

RI PT

104

2.2. Strains and Biofilm formation

106

To evaluate the interactions between C. tropicalis biofilm and human cells the

108

reference strain ATCC 750. This strain was maintained in glycerol stock at -80 °C,

109

which belongs to the collection of the Medical Mycology Laboratory from Universidade

110

Estadual de Maringá. Strain from frozen stock was culture onto Petri dishes containing

111

Sabouraud Dextrose Agar medium (SDA; Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) for 24 h at 35 °C.

112

The biofilm production on SCF was performed according to Capote-Bonato et al. [17].

113

Briefly small catheter fragments (SCF) 0.5 cm in length were placed in contact with 200

114

µl of a suspension containing 1×107 yeasts/ml, inside to wells of a 96-well microplate

115

(Kasvi®, K12-096). In these conditions, according Negri et al., 2010 [18] and Estivil et

116

al., 2011 [9] the biofilm appears to be consistent and at high concentrations [9,18]. After

117

incubation, the biofilms formed on catheter pieces had their medium culture refreshed

118

with 100 µL of RPMI 1640 medium and were further incubated for another 24 h under

119

the same conditions previously described. After maturation periods of 48 and 72 h were

120

reached, SCF were gently removed, and the biofilms attached were quantified.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

107

121 122

2.3. Quantification of in vitro mature C. tropicalis biofilms on SCF

123 124

Aiming the characterization of the biofilm produced by C. tropicalis on SCF was

125

evaluated after 48 and 72 h regarding three parameters: The number of cultivable cells

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 126

established by CFU (colony forming unit) counts, the in situ total metabolic activity of

127

biofilm, by 2,3-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulphophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-

128

tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) reduction assay were determined and the biofilm biomass

129

quantification by crystal violet staining, according to the protocol of Silva et al. [16]. The amount of total biofilm biomass at 48 and 72 h was estimated by crystal

131

violet staining methodology [16] with some adaptations. Briefly, after maturation, the

132

medium was removed, and SCF with C. tropicalis biofilms were washed with PBS to

133

remove non-adherent yeast cells. SCF were immersed in 100 µL of methanol (100%)

134

for 15 min. After that, SCF were air-dry at room temperature. Biofilms were stained

135

with 100 µL of 1% (w/v in water) crystal violet (CV) for 5 min. SCF were removed

136

with sterile forceps and transferred to another 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate,

137

where were washed twice with 100 µL of ultrapure water. Then, SCF were exposed to

138

33% (v/v) of acetic acid. Absorbance values were measured with a microtiter plate

139

reader at 570 nm (ASYS Expert Plus, Biochrom, Cambridge, UK) and expressed in

140

absorbance per unit area of the SCF. Uninoculated SCF were used as controls

141

performing the same procedures described above.

144 145

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

143

2.4. Interaction of C. tropicalis biofilm with human cells

AC C

142

RI PT

130

To verify if there was any type of interaction between C. tropicalis biofilm and

146

human cells, 48 h mature biofilms formed on SCF were placed in direct contact with

147

epithelial (HeLa) and endothelial (HUVEC) human cells. First, the aforementioned

148

human lines were subcultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine

149

serum (FBS). After a confluent epithelial/endothelial monolayer was formed, cells were

150

enzymatically detached, and the cell concentration was adjusted to 2 x 105 cells mL-1.

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Subsequently, total of 200 µL of this suspension were transferred to each well of a new

152

96-well bottom-flat microtiter plate and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in 5% CO2

153

atmosphere. After 24 h incubation, the culture medium was removed, and the wells

154

were washed once with PBS. Then, RPMI medium was added, but this time without

155

FBS. Subsequently, mature C. tropicalis biofilms (48 h) formed on SCF were carefully

156

washed twice with PBS and placed in contact with HeLa and HUVEC cells for 24 h at

157

37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2.

159

2.5. Quantification of mature C. tropicalis biofilm after contact with biotic surfaces

SC

158

RI PT

151

M AN U

160

After 24 h of co-incubation of mature C. tropicalis biofilms on SCF with human

162

cells, SCF were removed and washed twice with PBS to remove unattached yeast cells.

163

Then, each SCF was transferred to an Eppendorf tube containing 1 mL of PBS to

164

determine: fungal load (CFU), total biomass (CV) and metabolic activity (XTT), as

165

previously described. Medium was removed, and human cells were washed twice with

166

PBS. Then, cells were detached enzymatically with 25% trypsin-EDTA solution

167

(Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NE, USA), resuspended in PBS, and vortexed for 30 s

168

in order to disaggregate yeast cells from human cells. Ten-fold serial dilutions in PBS

169

from the obtained yeast suspension were made. A total of 20 µL of each dilution were

170

plated onto SDA and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The results were expressed as the

171

number of CFU per unit area (Log10 CFU/cm2) to estimate the ability of C. tropicalis

172

mature biofilm cells to adhere to human cells (CFU/mL). We used as controls SCF and

173

human cells that were not inoculated with yeast cells.

174

AC C

EP

TE D

161

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 175

2.6. Scanning electron microscopy of mature biofilm and humans cells after co-

176

incubation

177

Microscopic evaluations of both human cell surfaces after contact with C.

179

tropicalis biofilm and SCF surfaces were performed. All samples were sent to the

180

Laboratory of electron microscopy and microanalysis of Universidade Estadual de

181

Londrina (UEL/SETI) for the realization of scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RI PT

178

After 24 h of co-incubation with human cells, SCF were removed. Then, SCF

183

and microtiter plates containing human cells were washed twice with PBS, and air-dried

184

at room temperature. After that, they were fixed by immersion in 1 mL of 2.5%

185

glutaraldehyde (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, HE, Germany), and 2% paraformaldehyde

186

diluted in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution (pH

187

7.2) for 2 h. Then post-fixation in 1% OsO4, the samples were dehydrated in an ethanol

188

gradient (70, 80, 90 and 100%) and critical point dried with CO2 (BALTEC, DPC-030),

189

coated with gold (BALTEC, SDC-050 Sputter Coater) and photographed under a SEM

190

microscope (FEI Quanta 200) [19,20]. 72 h-mature C. tropicalis biofilm formed on SCF

191

(without contact with human cells) and human cell lines (without yeast) were

192

considered as controls. Triplicate samples were examined and at least 10 fields were

193

observed for each replicate and the most representative images were selected.

195

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

194

SC

182

2.7. Statistical analysis

196 197

All assays were performed in triplicate, and the results are shown as means ± SD

198

of three independent experiments. The analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism

199

version 5.0 software package for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 200

USA, Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). A one-way analysis of variance

201

(ANOVA), followed by the Bonferroni’s post-test, was used to evaluate the biofilm

202

maturity (48 h and 72 h) and to investigate a possible interaction between mature SCF

203

biofilm and human cells. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

205

RI PT

204

3. Results and Discussion

206

In this study, we proposed a simplified technique to evaluate experimentally

208

reproducing C. tropicalis biofilm-based on catheter. Our results showed that C.

209

tropicalis cells from the biofilm formed on catheter are able to migrate to the human

210

cells surface. Furthermore, morphological changes of yeast cells occurred during this

211

process.

M AN U

SC

207

The ability of C. tropicalis to form biofilm on SCF was confirmed and our

213

results were similar to others published studies [14,21,22]. In addition, a significant

214

increase in the number of yeasts, biomass and metabolic activity of mature biofilm on

215

SCF was observed (p < 0.05) (48 h and 72 h) (Table 1). Interestingly, there is a relation

216

between to an increased extracellular material and metabolic activity with biofilm

217

maturation over time, factors that unhappily appear to be also associated with increased

218

biofilm resistance [23]. Fig. 2 illustrates the morphological aspects of C. tropicalis cells

219

organized in 48 and 72h-mature biofilms on catheter. Through the observation of many

220

microscopic fields by SEM, it was possible to detect an increase of C. tropicalis biofilm

221

over time. However, it is important to highlight that the culture media can profoundly

222

affect C. tropicalis biofilm development, and consequently, these findings may vary

223

according to biofilm-forming conditions that yeast cells are exposed [24].

AC C

EP

TE D

212

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

As verified in Table 2, C. tropicalis yeast cells organized in SCF biofilm

225

suffered alterations after contact with human cells. Although not statistically significant,

226

there was a trend which suggested that the number of CFUs from biofilms on SCF

227

surface, after contact with HeLa (5.101±0.190) (p=0.06) and HUVEC (5.103±0.200)

228

(p=0.08), reduced in comparison to CFU count of 72-h mature C. tropicalis SCF

229

biofilm (before contact with human cells) (5.552±0.032). These findings, visualized by

230

(Fig. 2B and Fig. 3A and B) respectively, suggest that this weak reduction of yeast cells

231

(CFUs) on the catheter may be related to their migration from the catheter to the human

232

cell surfaces. Thus, we can hypothesize that this phenomenon (migration) is actually a

233

simulation of what occurs with patients undergoing catheterization. Therefore, it is

234

reasonable to assume that detached yeasts from mature biofilm could reach host cells

235

and other human body sites by dissemination, as it has been previously described by

236

different studies for C. albicans and C. tropicalis [17,21,25].

M AN U

SC

RI PT

224

On the other hand, according to Table 2 the mature biofilm (72 h), after contact

238

with both human cells showed a significant reduction in total biomass and metabolic

239

activity (p < 0.05). This reduction in the metabolic activity is possibly due to many cells

240

become dormant when biofilm is matured, these are metabolically inactive cells, namely

241

persistent cells, which are high resistance to antifungals [26]. In addition, was observed

242

also a difference in CV and metabolic activity among HeLa and HUVEC cells (Table

243

2). Candida invasion into endothelial cells occurs as in hyphal as yeast form, thus it is

244

possible the yeast could be endocytosed before of morphogenic transformation, in the

245

subsequent trans-endothelial cell migration happened [27]. Besides, the different

246

behavior among cells-yeast is common, Negri et al. [28] showed that C. tropicalis

247

adhere significantly better in intestinal cells (Caco-2) than to urinary cells (TCC-SUP)

248

or cervical cells (HeLa). These data endorsed our finds that adhesion is specie specific

AC C

EP

TE D

237

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

and also tissue specific. CV staining was used to assess total biomass quantification

250

(pseudohyphae, hyphae and yeasts cells into biofilm and matrix components). Since

251

only CFUs’ number did not change statistically significant, this fact could suggest that

252

matrix components were actually the ones to suffer some type of modulation on their

253

structures (Table 2) and the yeast morphology (Fig 2B and Fig 3A and B). Recent

254

studies [7,29] have showed Candida spp. matrix adaptation in response to antifungal

255

stress, resulting in decrease of protein components and increase of carbohydrates

256

molecules, such as β-1,3 glucans, to promote the thickness of the biofilm and higher

257

protection.

SC

RI PT

249

It is known that C. tropicalis biofilm is highly influenced by environmental

259

conditions and further they are able to colonize human cells and tissues in vitro and in

260

vivo studies, as well as other Candida species [10,15,17,24,27,30,31]. Also, C.

261

tropicalis is able to affect the virulence profile of C. albicans by reducing the biofilm

262

formation by decreasing viable cell counts, metabolic activity and hyphal growth in co-

263

incubation environment [30]. However, few studies about biofilm after contact with a

264

biotic surface, such as human cells and tissues had been performed.

TE D

M AN U

258

In relation to morphological aspects, important alterations (between SCF’s and

266

human cells’ surfaces) were observed. Firstly, yeast cells of mature C. tropicalis biofilm

267

on SCF were primarily composed by budding cells (Fig. 2B); whereas after the contact

268

with the tested human cell lines, these yeasts appeared predominantly in the filamentous

269

form (Fig. 3A, 3B). This important morphological alteration could be attributed to the

270

interaction between the biofilm and the cellular environment. In addition, it is important

271

to mention that yeast-to-hyphal transition is highly relevant to some pathogenic yeasts

272

and is considered one of the most important steps for the establishment of candidiasis

AC C

EP

265

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 273

[4]. In this case, it was confirmed that C. tropicalis cells organized in biofilm switched

274

to filamentous form and showed high ability to interact with human cells. The present study also evaluated the yeast cells that migrated from the biofilm,

276

formed on SCF, to the human cells. For that, quantitative and qualitative evaluations of

277

the fresh biofilm formed on human cell surfaces were assessed by CFU, which showed

278

a similar number of viable yeast cells (count 5.440 Log10/cm2 for HeLa cells and 5.524

279

Log10/cm2 for HUVEC cells). Visual observation of human cell surfaces by SEM

280

revealed that yeasts cells from C. tropicalis biofilm, originally attached to SCF, were

281

able to form a fresh biofilm on both human cell lines as demonstrated in Figure 3 (3C,

282

3D).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

275

Uppuluri et al. [25], using a flow biofilm model, observed the phenomenon of C.

284

albicans biofilm dispersion. Likewise, the authors noticed that dispersed C. albicans

285

were predominantly in the yeast form (blastoconidia), while true hyphae were observed

286

inside the biofilm biomass. Similar to C. albicans, yeast-to-hyphal transition is also an

287

important step for C. tropicalis in order to promote adhesion and invasion of cells and

288

tissues. C. tropicalis has developed strategies to damage the epithelial cell barrier that

289

consequently leads to invasion of such cells and even tissues [10,15]. Therefore, it may

290

be necessary the occurrence of hyphae elongation in order to initiate an active invasion

291

on human cells. As a result, hyphae elongation is able to push yeast cells inside of

292

epithelial cell [32]. It is noteworthy that blastoconidia can also facilitate the division,

293

and consequently, the distribution of yeasts in this environment [33].

AC C

EP

TE D

283

294

Although previous studies have found out that C. tropicalis has actually the

295

ability to invade human tissue [10], it is still unclear whether this phenomenon occurs

296

during the initial phase of contact between biofilm and human cellular surface.

297

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 298

4. Conclusion

299

The present study described a simple and easy in vitro model, based on well-

301

known techniques, which allowed to reproduce a mature C. tropicalis biofilm on SCF

302

and, evaluate its interaction with human cells. Our results indicated that this

303

methodology allowed to characterize morphological aspects of C. tropicalis biofilms

304

under different circumstances. It was demonstrated that C. tropicalis organized in

305

mature biofilm on SCF suffer a morphology transition, from blastoconidia to the

306

filamentous form. Besides, also was observed change regarding to extracellular matrix

307

components after contact between this biofilm and human cells, with reduction of total

308

biomass and metabolic activity. These facts have been hypothesized to be due to the

309

migration of yeasts from the biofilm, and its availability for possible adhesion in other

310

sites. Consequently, this in vitro model revealed to be a useful alternative assessment

311

tool for future studies, especially those involving animal models, since it provides great

312

contribution in understanding the mechanisms of C. tropicalis biofilms. Deep insights

313

on pathogenesis of C. tropicalis are essential in order to the diseases caused by yeast in

314

catheterized patients.

316 317 318

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

Acknowledgements

AC C

315

RI PT

300

The authors thank the personnel of Universidade Estadual de Maringá,

319

Laboratory of electron microscopy and microanalysis, Universidade Estadual de

320

Londrina (UEL/SETI) and Universidade de Franca their excellent technical assistance.

321

We also thank Dr. Pedrina Gonçalves Vidigal for review of the English text.

322

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 323

Funding Information

324

This study received financial support from CAPES, CNPq, Fundação Araucária

326

and FAPESP. Bonato holds a scholarship from CAPES. Svidzinski holds a fellowship

327

from CNPq.

RI PT

325

328 329

Conflict of Interest

SC

330

332 333

References

334

[1]

M AN U

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

331

F. Bongomin, S. Gago, R. Oladele, D. Denning, Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases—Estimate Precision, J. Fungi. 3 (2017) 1-29.

336

doi:10.3390/jof3040057.

337

[2]

TE D

335

P.F. Wu, W. Liu, M.H. Hsieh, I.M. Hii, Y.L. Lee, Y.T. Lin, M.W. Ho, C.E. Liu, Y.H. Chen, F.D. Wang, Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of

339

candidemia isolates of non, Emerg. Microbes Infect. 6 (2017) 1-7. doi:

340

10.1038/emi.2017.74. [3]

M. Bassetti, E. Righi, F. Ansaldi, M. Merelli, T. Cecilia, G. De Pascale, A. Diaz-

AC C

341

EP

338

Martin, R. Luzzati, C. Rosin, L. Lagunes, E.M. Trecarichi, M. Sanguinetti, B.

342

Posteraro, J. Garnacho-Montero, A. Sartor, J. Rello, G. Della Rocca, M.

343 344

Antonelli, M. Tumbarello, A multicenter study of septic shock due to

345

candidemia: Outcomes and predictors of mortality, Intensive Care Med. 40

346

(2014) 839–845. doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3310-z.

347

[4]

D.L. Zuza-Alves, W.P. Silva-Rocha, G.M. Chaves, An Update on Candida

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 348

tropicalis Based on Basic and Clinical Approaches, Front. Microbiol. 8 (2017) 1-

349

25. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01927.

350

[5]

S. Silva, M. Negri, M. Henriques, R. Oliveira, D.W. Williams, J. Azeredo, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: Biology,

352

epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36

353

(2012) 288–305. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00278.x. [6]

[7]

C.F. Rodrigues, M.E. Rodrigues, S. Silva, M. Henriques, Candida glabrata

357

Biofilms :

358

doi:10.3390/jof3010011.

359

[8]

SC

albicans, Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 68 (2015) 96–101. doi:10.5173/ceju.2015.01.474.

355 356

P. Behzadi, E. Behzadi, R. Ranjbar, Urinary tract infections and Candida

How

Far

Have

We

Come ?,

J.

Fungi.

M AN U

354

RI PT

351

3

(2017)

1–30.

M.F. González-Lara, P. Torres-González, P. Cornejo-Juárez, C. Velázquez-

360

Acosta, A. Martinez-Gamboa, A. Rangel-Cordero, M. Bobadilla-del-Valle, L.

361

Ostrosky-Zeichner, A.

362

inappropriate antifungal therapy according to current susceptibility breakpoints

363

on Candida bloodstream infection mortality, a retrospective analysis, BMC

364

Infect. Dis. 17 (2017) 1-9. doi:10.1186/s12879-017-2846-2.

366 367

[9]

EP

TE D

Impact of

D. Estivill, A. Arias, A. Torres-Lana, A.J. Carrillo-Muñoz, M.P. Arévalo, Biofilm formation by five species of Candida on three clinical materials, J.

AC C

365

Ponce-de-León, J. Sifuentes-Osornio,

Microbiol. Methods. 86 (2011) 238–242. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2011.05.019.

368

[10] C. Ferreira, B. Gonçalves, D. Vilas Boas, H. Oliveira, M. Henriques, J. Azeredo,

369

S. Silva, Candida tropicalis biofilm and human epithelium invasion is highly

370

influenced

371

doi:10.1093/femspd/ftw101.

372

by

environmental

pH,

Pathog.

Dis.

74

(2016)

1-17.

[11] C.H.G. Martins, R.H. Pires, A.O. Cunha, C.A.M. Pereira, J. de L. Singulani, F.

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 373

Abrão, T. de Moraes, M.J.S. Mendes-Giannini, Candida/Candida biofilms. First

374

description of dual-species Candida albicans/C. rugosa biofilm, Fungal Biol. 120

375

(2016) 530–537. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2016.01.013. [12] D. Araújo, M. Henriques, S. Silva, Portrait of Candida Species Biofilm

377

Regulatory

378

doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.004.

379

Network

Genes,

Trends

Microbiol.

25

(2017)

62–75.

RI PT

376

[13] K.F. Mitchell, R. Zarnowski, D.R. Andes, The Extracellular Matrix of Fungal Biofilms, Adv Exp Med Biol. 931 (2016) 21–35. doi:10.1007/5584_2016_6.

381

[14] L.J. Marcos-Zambrano, P. Escribano, E. Bouza, J. Guinea, Production of biofilm

382

by Candida and non-Candida spp. isolates causing fungemia: Comparison of

383

biomass production and metabolic activity and development of cut-off points, Int.

384

J. Med. Microbiol. 304 (2014) 1192–1198. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.08.012.

385

[15] M. Negri, S. Silva, D. Breda, M. Henriques, J. Azeredo, R. Oliveira, Candida

386

tropicalis biofilms: Effect on urinary epithelial cells, Microb. Pathog. 53 (2012)

387

95–99. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2012.05.006.

TE D

M AN U

SC

380

[16] S. Silva, M. Henriques, R. Oliveira, D. Williams, J. Azeredo, In vitro biofilm

389

activity of non-Candida albicans Candida species, Curr. Microbiol. 61 (2010)

390

534–540. doi:10.1007/s00284-010-9649-7.

EP

388

[17] F. Capote-Bonato, D.V. Bonato, I.M. Ayer, L.F. Magalhães, G.M. Magalhães,

392

F.F. Pereira da Câmara Barros, P.P.M. Teixeira, L.Z. Crivellenti, M. Negri, T.I.E.

393

AC C

391

Svidzinski, Murine model for the evaluation of candiduria caused by Candida

394

tropicalis

from

biofilm,

Microb.

395

doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.02.036.

Pathog.

117

(2018)

170–174.

396

[18] M. Negri, V. Gonçalves, S. Silva, M. Henriques, J. Azeredo, R. Oliveira, Crystal

397

violet staining to quantify Candida adhesion to epithelial cells, Br. J. Biomed.

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 398

Sci. 67 (2010) 120–125. doi:10.1080/09674845.2010.11730308. [19] E.K. Nishio, J.M. Ribeiro, A.G. Oliveira, C.G.T.J. Andrade, E.A. Proni, R.K.T.

400

Kobayashi, G. Nakazato, Antibacterial synergic effect of honey from two

401

stingless bees: Scaptotrigona bipunctata Lepeletier, 1836, and S. postica

402

Latreille, 1807, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 1-8. doi:10.1038/srep21641.

RI PT

399

[20] A.G. De Oliveira, F.R. Spago, A.S. Simionato, M.O.P. Navarro, C.S. Da Silva,

404

A.R. Barazetti, M.V.T. Cely, C.A. Tischer, J.A.B. San Martin, C.G.T. De Jesus

405

Andrade, C.R. Novello, J.C.P. Mello, G. Andrade, Bioactive organocopper

406

compound from Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibits the growth of Xanthomonas

407

citri

408

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00113.

411

Front.

Microbiol.

M AN U

410

citri,

7

(2016)

1–12.

[21] J.L. Del Pozo, E. Cantón, Candidiasis asociada a biopelículas, Revista Iberoamericana de Micología, 33 (2016) 176–183.

[22] P. Uppuluri, J.L. Lopez-Ribot, Go Forth and Colonize: Dispersal from Clinically

TE D

409

subsp.

SC

403

412

Important

Microbial

Biofilms,

413

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005397.

PLoS

Pathog.

12

(2016)

1–9.

[23] J. Chandra, D.M. Kuhn, P.K. Mukherjee, L.L. Hoyer, T. McCormick, M.A.

415

Ghannoum, a Mahmoud, T.M.C. Cormick, M.A. Ghannoum, J.S.F. and A.P.

416

Mitchell, Genetic Control of Candida albicans Biofilm Development, Natl.

AC C

417

EP

414

Reviiew Microbiol. 9 (2001) 109–118. doi:10.1128/JB.183.18.5385.

418

[24] M.M. Weerasekera, G.K. Wijesinghe, T.A. Jayarathna, C.P. Gunasekara, N.

419

Fernando, N. Kottegoda, L.P. Samaranayake, Culture media profoundly affect

420

Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis growth, adhesion and biofilm

421

development, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 111 (2016) 697–702. doi:10.1590/0074-

422

02760160294.

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 423

[25] P.

Uppuluri,

A.K.

Chaturvedi,

A.

Srinivasan,

M.

Banerjee,

A.K.

424

Ramasubramaniam, J.R. Köhler, D. Kadosh, J.L. Lopez-Ribot, Dispersion as an

425

important step in the Candida albicans biofilm developmental cycle, PLoS

426

Pathog. 6 (2010) 1-13. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000828. [26] M.D. LaFleur, C.A. Kumamoto, K. Lewis, Candida albicans biofilms produce

428

antifungal-tolerant persister cells, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50 (2006)

429

3839–3846. doi:10.1128/AAC.00684-06.

431

[27] J.P. Richardson, J.H. and J.R. Naglik, Candida – Epithelial Interactions, J. Fungi. 4 (2018) 1–14. doi:10.3390/jof4010022.

SC

430

RI PT

427

[28] M. Negri, C. Botelho, S. Silva, L.M.R.H. Lopes, M. Henriques, J. Azeredo, R.

433

Oliveira, An in vitro evaluation of Candida tropicalis infectivity using human

434

cell

435

doi:10.1099/jmm.0.031195-0.

monolayers,

J.

M AN U

432

Med.

Microbiol.

60

(2011)

1270–1275.

[29] C.F. Rodrigues, M.E. Rodrigues, M. Henriques, C.F. Rodrigues, M.E. Rodrigues,

437

M. Henriques, Susceptibility of Candida glabrata biofilms to echinocandins :

438

alterations in the matrix composition matrix composition, Biofouling. 7014

439

(2018) 1–10. doi:10.1080/08927014.2018.1472244.

EP

TE D

436

[30] P.P. De Barros, R.D. Rossoni, F. Freire, D.C. Ribeiro, L. Alexandre, J. Campos,

441

A. Olavo, C. Jorge, Candida tropicalis affects the virulence profile of Candida

442 443 444 445 446 447

AC C

440

albicans: An in vitro and in vivo study, Pathog Dis. 2 (2018) 1-22. doi:10.1093/femspd/fty014/4898016.

[31] C. Lin, C. Wu, S. Yu, Y. Chen, Protein kinase A governs growth and virulence in Candida tropicalis, Virulence. 9 (2018) 331–347. [32] M. Swidergall, S.G. Filler, Oropharyngeal Candidiasis: Fungal Invasion and Epithelial

Cell

Responses,

PLoS

Pathog.

13

(2017)

1–7.

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 448

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006056.

449

[33] Q. Zhang, L. Tao, G. Guan, H. Yue, W. Liang, C. Cao, Y. Dai, G. Huang,

450

Regulation of filamentation in the human fungal pathogen Candida tropicalis,

451

Mol. Microbiol. 99 (2016) 528–545. doi:10.1111/mmi.13247.

RI PT

452 453 454

Figure legends

SC

455

Fig. 1 - Description and evaluation of biofilm production and interaction with human

457

cell lines. Mature C. tropicalis (ATCC 750) biofilms on catheter (A) without contact

458

with human cells and (B) after contact with human cells. Abbreviations: SCF- Small

459

Catheter Fragment; CV - Cristal Violet; XTT -2,3 – bis (2–methoxy–4–nitro–5-

460

sulfophenyl) -2H– tetrazolium– 5- carboxanilide; CFU - Colony Forming Units; SEM -

461

Scanning Electron Microscopy.

TE D

462

M AN U

456

Fig. 2 - Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of mature C. tropicalis biofilm on

464

catheter, observed at magnification x 6000. (A) Biofilm formed in 48 h; (B) Biofilm

465

formed in 72 h (Fig. 1 A).

AC C

466

EP

463

467

Fig. 3 - Scanning electron microscopy images of mature C. tropicalis biofilms on SCF

468

and human cells surfaces. Surface of SCF containing mature C. tropicalis biofilms after

469

contact with Hela (A) and HUVEC (B) human cells, original magnification x 800.

470

Human cell surfaces HeLa (C) and HUVEC (D) showed predominant adhesion of

471

blastoconidia and dense extracellular matrix, original magnification x 5000.

472

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. Characterization of Candida tropicalis biofilm formed on SCFs Characterization of mature biofilms on catheter (Mean±SD†)

Biofilm maturity (h)

CV§

XTT||

(Log10/cm2)

(Abs570nm/cm2)

(Abs490nm/cm2)

48

4.261±0.194

0.151±0.030

72

5.552±0.032*

0.291±0.030*

RI PT

CFU‡

0.111±0.082

0.349±0.040*

SC

*Significant increase between 48 and 72 h (p<0.05). Abs: Absorbance; †SD: Standard deviation; ‡CFU: Colony forming units per cm2; §CV: Crystal violet; ||XTT: 2,3 – bis

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

(2–methoxy–4–nitro–5-sulfophenyl) -2H– tetrazolium– 5- carboxanilide.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2. Characterization of yeast biofilm on catheter after contact with human cells. Assay to characterization of biofilm

Mature biofilm

on catheter Without

After contact with human

contact

cells

RI PT

(Mean±SD†)

HeLa

HUVEC

5.103±0.200

5.552±0.032

5.101±0.190

CV§ (Abs570nm/cm2)

0.291±0.029

0.170±0.004* 0.099±0.022*

XTT|| (Abs490nm/cm2)

0.349±0.040

SC

CFU‡ (Log10/cm2)

M AN U

0.063±0.048* 0.140±0.176*

*Represents a significant decrease after contact with human cells (p<0.05). Abs: Absorbance; †SD: Standard deviation; ‡CFU: Colony forming units; §CV: Crystal violet; ||

AC C

EP

TE D

XTT: 2,3 - bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl) -2H- tetrazolium-5- carboxanilide.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights

• • •

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC



C. tropicalis was able to form biofilm on small catheter fragments of 0.5 cm length. Yeast cells from mature biofilm migrated and formed a fresh one on human cell surface A simple methodology to investigate C. tropicalis migration from biofilms is proposed C. tropicalis biofilm formed on catheter was mainly composed by filamentous form. The fresh C. tropicalis biofilm formed on human cells had mainly blastoconidia.

RI PT