In vitro susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) to fosfomycin

In vitro susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) to fosfomycin

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 42 (2002) 269 –271 www.elsevier.com/locate/diagmicrobio In vitro susceptibility of vancomycin-resista...

39KB Sizes 0 Downloads 53 Views

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 42 (2002) 269 –271

www.elsevier.com/locate/diagmicrobio

In vitro susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) to fosfomycin Mary Beth Perria,b, Ellie Hershbergera, Mihaela Ionescua, Carl Lautera,c, Marcus J. Zervosa,b,c,* a

Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA b Department of Clinical Pathology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA c Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA Received 28 August 2001; accepted 10 January 2002

Abstract We evaluated the in vitro activity of fosfomycin against 75 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Using the NCCLS breakpoint for susceptibility of urinary tract isolates to fosfomycin (MIC ⱖ 256), 51 out of 52 Enterococcus faecium and all Enterococcus faecalis isolates tested were susceptible or intermediate to fosfomycin. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction Fosfomycin is a phosphonic acid bactericidal agent that acts primarily by inhibiting bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan synthesis (Patel et al., 1997). The compound is active against many urinary pathogens including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus saprophyticus and many strains of enterococci (Hamilton-Miller, 1991; Med. Let. Drugs Ther., 1997; Patel, 1997). Published MICs90 of fosfomycin against enterococci are 52.3 ␮g/ml (Patel et al., 1997). There is little information on the activity of fosfomycin vs. VRE. In recent years, enterococci have emerged as significant clinical pathogens with both intrinsic and acquired resistance to a number of antibiotics. In view of the limited treatment options for VRE, in this study we evaluated the in vitro susceptibilities of fosfomycin versus 75 clinical isolates of VRE.

2. Materials and methods We tested 75 clinical isolates of VRE. The strains of VRE used in this study were clinical isolates obtained from hospitalized patients from 1991 to 1998 from different U.S. * Corresponding author. Tel.: ⫹1-248-551-0419; fax: ⫹1-248-5515069. E-mail address: [email protected] (M.J. Zervos).

hospitals. All isolates were resistant to multiple other agents including ampicillin and high-levels of gentamicin. Fiftytwo isolates were E. faecium and 23 isolates were E. faecalis. Twenty-two isolates were from urine, 18 isolates were from unknown/other sources, 16 isolates were from blood, 12 isolates were from wounds/abscesses, 6 isolates were from peritoneal fluid and one isolate was from nasal secretions. The bacteria were identified as enterococci using conventional biochemical tests as described by Facklam and Collins (Facklam & Collins, 1989). All isolates were stored in BHI/glycerol broth at ⫺70°C. Fosfomycin (Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., St. Louis, MO) was obtained in the form of standard laboratory powder and was stored at ⫺70°C before use. Fosfomycin E-strips (lot no.B92692) were purchased from AB Biodisk North America Inc., Piscataway, NJ. Fosfomycin E-strips contain glucose-6-phosphate (25 ␮g/ml). MICs for fosfomycin were determined for each isolate by E-test (Fuchs et al., 1999) and a previously described microtiter broth dilution method (Barry & Fuchs, 1991) and according to guidelines established by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS, 1999). The organisms were incubated for 20h in Mueller-Hinton broth and appropriate dilutions were made to obtain a final inoculum of 5 ⫻ 105 CFU/mL. Antibiotics were prepared manually in cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 25 ␮g/ml of glucose-6-phosphate and

0732-8893/02/$ – see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 7 3 2 - 8 8 9 3 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 3 7 0 - X

270

M.B. Perri et al. / Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 42 (2002) 269 –271

Table 1 In vitro broth microdilution susceptibilities of multidrug resistant enterococci to fosfomycin

E. faecium E. faecalis Total

4. Discussion

No. of strains

Microdilution MICs (␮g/ml) 8

16

32

64

128

256

512

1024

52 23 75

1 0 1

0 2 2

3 13 16

31 8 39

16 0 16

1 0 1

0 0 0

0 0 0

were dispensed automatically with an MIC-2000 dispenser (Dymatech Laboratories, Inc., Alexandria, VA). Concentrations of fosfomycin tested ranged from 64 ␮g/ml to 1024 ␮g/ml. The MIC was described at the lowest concentration of drug that prevented visible growth after 18h of incubation. Interpretations of in vitro resistance were made according to NCCLS. The cutoffs for resistance to fosfomycin for treatment of urinary tract infection are ⱖ256 ␮g/ml and sensitive is defined as MIC ⱕ 64 ␮g/ml.

3. Results The MICs for the 52 E. faecium isolates ranged from 8 to 256 ␮g/ml. The MICs for the 23 E. faecalis isolates ranged from 16 to 64 ␮g/ml (broth microdilution) (see Table 1). Results of E-strip tests were more consistent with broth microdilution for E. faecalis isolates (MIC range 12– 64 ␮g/ml). Although the overall susceptibility rate (67%) was similar among the E. faecium isolates some variation was seen between the broth microdilution and E-test results. None of the E. faecium isolates were resistant by E-test (Table 2). Vancomycin genotype was known for 34 isolates (18 were vanA and 16 were vanB). For vanA isolates, fosfomycin MICs ranged from 8 to 128 ␮g/ml. One isolate had MICs ⫽ 8 ␮g/ml, 3 isolates had MICs ⫽ 32 ␮g/ml, 10 isolates had MICs ⫽ 64 ␮g/ml and 4 isolates had MICs ⫽ 128 ␮g/ml. For vanB isolates, fosfomycin MICs ranged from 16 to 128 ␮g/ml. One isolate had MICs ⫽ 16 ␮g/ml, 5 isolates had MICs ⫽ 32 ␮g/ml, 7 isolates had MICs ⫽ 64 ␮g/ml and 3 isolates had MICs ⫽ 128 ␮g/ml.

Table 2 In vitro E strip susceptibilities of multidrug resistant enterococci to fosfomycin

E. faecium E. faecalis Total

No. of strains

E-test MICs (␮g/ml) 8

12

16

24

32

48

64

96

128

256

52 23 75

0 0 0

0 1 1

0 0 0

3 6 18

5 16 21

13 20 33

14 15 29

12 12 24

5 5 10

0 0 0

Fosfomycin has been available in Europe for many years as a parenteral compound, fosfomycin disodium. Two other compounds are available for oral administration: fosfomycin calcium and fosfomycin trometamol. Fosfomycin trometamol is the result of systematic studies aimed at improving the biopharmaceutical properties and, among all the phosphonic acid derivatives, is the compound with the most favorable bioavailability profile. Fosfomycin trometamol has the attributes considered desirable in an agent to be used for the single-dose therapy of uncomplicated lower UTI; these include a broad spectrum of activity against common urinary pathogens, high and prolonged urinary concentrations, retention of antibacterial activity in the presence of urine, rapid bactericidal activity, little or no tendency to induce or select for resistant strains, and good tolerability (Bergan et al., 1990). There is limited information on treatment of VRE, however, a successfully treated complicated VRE urinary tract infection treated with fosfomycin has been reported (Shrestha et al., 2000). In multiple dose use studies, resistance to fosfomycin emerges rapidly but cross-resistance with other antimicrobials has been uncommon, possibly due to its unique chemical structure and mechanism of action (Suarez et al., 1991; Greenwood et al., 1990). Bacterial resistance to fosfomycin can be either chromosomal or, more rarely, plasmid mediated. Fosfomycin is taken into cells by active transport through the partially constitutive L-2-glycerophosphate uptake system and by a secondary transport system which mediates hexose monophosphate uptake. Most chromosomally resistant mutants have an impairment in one or both of these uptake systems (Suarez et al., 1991). The use of fosfomycin has selected another type of resistant organisms which actively incorporate the drug and have a fully sensitive target enzyme indicating that their mechanism of resistance is different from that of the previously described mutants. They are usually multiresistant, can transfer their resistance through conjugation or transformation, and can be made susceptible through the use of curing agents, indicating a plasmid location for the fosfomycin resistance determinant. All VRE faecalis tested in this study were susceptible to fosfomycin and 35 out of 52 (67%) VRE faecium isolates in our study were susceptible to fosfomycin and 16 (31%) were intermediate (MIC ⫽ 128 ␮g/ml) as determined by broth microdilution. No apparent association was noted between presence of vanA or vanB genes and fosfomycin susceptibility. Majority of the isolates were from urinary tract and source of the isolates was not associated with higher MICs to fosfomycin. Isolates of VRE we studied were from both before and after FDA approval of fosfomycin in the United States. Fosfomycin trometamol has only been approved for use for treating single, uncomplicated episodes of lower urinary tract infections. Our study has only addressed the issue of in vitro susceptibilities of VRE

M.B. Perri et al. / Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 42 (2002) 269 –271

to fosfomycin. Given the high rate of VRE susceptibility to fosfomycin and the good tolerability and high urinary concentrations of the drug, fosfomycin may be considered for treatment of uncomplicated VRE lower urinary tract infections. Further studies will be needed to address the clinical usefulness of fosfomycin.

References Barry, A. L., & Fuchs P. C. (1991). In vitro susceptibility testing procedures for fosfomycin tromethamine. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 35, 1235–1238. Bergan, T. (1990). Degree of absorption, pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin trometamol and duration of urinary antibacterial activity. Infection, 18 (Suppl. 2), S65–S69. Facklam. R. R., & Collins, M. D. (1989). Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 27, 731–734. Fuchs, P. C., Barry, A. L., & Brown, S. D. (1999). Fosfomycin tromethamine susceptibility of outpatient urine isolatesof Escherichia

271

coli and Enterococcus faecalis from ten North American medical centers by three methods. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 43, 137–140. Greenwood, D. (1990). Fosfomycin trometamol: activity in vitro against urinary tract pathogens. Infection, 18 (Suppl. 2), S60 –S64. Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T. (1991). In vitro activity of fosfomycin against A problem gram positive cocci. Microbiology, 71, 95–103. The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics (1997). Fosfomycin for urinary tract infection. Vol. 39 (issue 1005). National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1999). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; ninth informational supplement. 2nd ed. M7-T2D. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, PA. Shrestha, N. K., Amuh, D., Goldman, M. P., Riebel, W. J., & Tomford, J. W. (2000). Treatment of a complicated vancomycin-resistant enterococcal urinary tract infection with fosfomycin. Infectious Disease Clinical Practice, 9, 368 –371. Patel, S. (1997). Fosfomycin trometamine, a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy as a single-dose oral treatment for acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections. Drugs, 53 (4), 637– 656. Suarez, J. E. (1991). Minireview. Plasmid encoded fosfomycin resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 35, 791–795.