19.5
Epilepsy Research, 16 ( 1993) 1955206 0920-121 l/93/$06.00 11:~1993 Elsevier Science Publishers
EPIRES
B.V. All rights reserved
00607
Increased neocortical spiking and surgical outcome after selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy
F. Cendes,
F. Dubeau,
Department @Neurology
A. Olivier, A. Cukiert, F. Andermann*
E. Andermann,
L.F. Quesney,
and Neurosurgery, McGill University and the Montreal Neurological Hospital and Institute. 3801 University St., Montreal, Que.. Canada H3A 2B4 (Received
30 April
1993; revision
received
15July 1993; accepted 20 July 1993)
Abstract We studied prospectively inserted
through
interictal made
the electrocorticogram in 13 consecutive
spiking,
at the amygdala
recorded
either independently
abnormality
spikes and polyspikes,
separated in 1958.
by Niemeyer
The outcome ECoG
was comparable
and
interictal
spiking
following
and a different
background,
to that of standard
is often used to tailor the amount
after
recorded
anterior
of resection,
transcortical
selective
ECoG was performed
hippocampus.
parahippocampal
in all 16 patients
by attenuated
immediately
in three others.
Before
from the depth and surface.
This is not the case in selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy. increased
and
and anterior
amygdala
was observed
reported
before
and retrospectively
T2 aimed
in T2. The hippocampus,
epileptiform
(ECoG)
patients
gyrus
resection
the ECoG
or synchronously. were
removed
ECoG pattern
temporal
resection:
subpially.
emerged.
suggesting
62.5% class
of epileptic
that a different
and two depth electrodes
showed
a variable
A small cortical
from the most anterior
and the persistence
amygdalo-hippocampectomy,
with surface
After
It consisted temporal
incision
amount
the resection.
of repetitive,
of
(2-3 cm) was increased
high amplitude
area. Similar observations
were
I and 25% class II (Engel’s scale).
abnormalities underlying
correlates mechanism
with worse outcome. is responsible
for the
this procedure.
Key words: Electrocorticography;
1. Introduction Electrocorticography (ECoG) can be performed before epilepsy surgery to help in the localization of the epileptogenic area, using the spatial distribution of interictal spiking [ 1,4,10,17,23,27]. However, the role of ECoG in defining the region of epileptogenic tissue to be removed remains uncertain and controversial [6]. The intuitive notion that *Corresponding author. Tel.: (514) 398-1976; Fax: 514-398-8540
EEG; Temporal
lobe epilepsy
a more complete resection of the area producing spikes is associated with better outcome has been supported by several studies [4,6,18,26], but refuted by others [8,11,20]. It is also possible that the significance of remaining spikes after surgical excision differs according to the anatomic location of the focus (i.e., temporal lobe and extra-temporal), and the underlying pathological substrate (i.e., different types of structural lesions and lesions not detectable by imaging). The first report of ECoG findings after selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy was published by
196
Niemeyer who introduced this surgical approach for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy [Zlf. In the present study we analyzed the surgical outcome, the results of ECoGs before and immediately after selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy, and post-operative scalp EEGs in 16 patients.
vier. After exposure of the temporal neocortex, ECoG was performed with 16 carbon-tip electrodes placed on the surface of the cortex. The electrodes were about 1 cm apart in an antero-posterior direction and approximately 2 cm apart in the supero-inferior plane. After initial recording, two 5-contact depth electrodes were inserted through the second temporal gyrus (T2), approximately 4 and 5 cm from the temporal tip, aiming at the amygdala and at the anterior hippocampus respectively. After the initial ECoG a small cortical incision (2 cm) was made in T2 and a thin corridor was fashioned through the temporal subcortical white matter until the roof of the temporal horn was reached. The hippocampal formation was dissected by subpial resection with the ultrasound dissector (CUSA). The parahippocampal gyrus was then removed, the hippocampus tifted laterally and transected at the level of the tail and removed en bloc. The removal proceeded with the resection of the amygdala and uncus [24]. After this a postresection ECoG was performed with the same position of surface electrodes as before. In seven patients a flexible electrode was placed on the stump of the hippocampus. All patients were operated under general anesthe-
2. Patients and methods We studied 16 patients (mean age, 30.6 years; range 15-51 years; seven men and nine women) with medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy who unde~ent selective transcortical amygdalohippocampectomy. Results of ECoG were analyzed prospectively in 13 consecutive patients and retrospectively in three consecutive patients who had pre- and post-resection ECoG. All patients underwent an extensive presurgical evaluation that included long-term video-EEG monitoring, neuropsychological evaluation, intracarotid sodium amytal study and MRI scans, including volumetric studies in nine patients [5,30]. The preoperative EEG recordings were reviewed, in order to assess the interictal epileptic abnormalities. The surgical technique was inspired by Niemeyer’s approach [21,22] and modified by A. Oli-
TABLE
1
Patients’
demographic
Pt. #
Sex
Age
data Age of onset
EEG lateralization
MRI
11 years 24 years 3 years
right TL right TL tight TL left TL left TL right TL right TL left TL right TL left TL left TL left TL left TL right TL right TL left TL
Rt AM + Rt AM + Lesion Rt Lt AM + Lt AM + Rt AM + Rt AM + Lt AM + NL Lt AM + Lt AM + Lt AM + NLa Lt AM + Lesion Rt Lt AM +
(years)
-
I
12 13 14 15
F M F M M F M F M F M F M F F
16
F
2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 IO
11
“Includes
18 51 29 15 36 25 23 38 35 30 36 21 36 43 21 33
I year 8 months I year I3 years 18 years 20 years 13 years 25 years 3 years 32 years 36 years 3 years 2 months
MRI volumetric
AM = amygdala,
HF =
NA = not available,
MTS
-
HF atrophy” HF atrophya parahipp HF atrophy HF atrophy HF atrophy HF atrophy’ HF atrophy” HF atrophy + sig HF atrophya HF atrophy + sig HF atrophy” mesial TL* HF atrophy + sig
Pathology
Follow-up (months)
Outcome class
MTS Mod MTS Mild Glioma NA MTS Sev NA MTS Mod MTS Mod MTS Mild MTS Mild MTS SW NA MTS Mild MTS Mild MTS Mild MTS Sev
18 1x 13 8 19 96 18 19 16 25 16 89 18 27 12 28
fl III
I 11
I I
I I I
I II
I II III
I I
study.
hippocampalformation,NL = mesial temporal
sclerosis,
= normal, Mod
+sig
= hyperintense
= moderate,
signal in TZweighted
Sev = severe.
images.
197
sia with nitrous droperidol.
oxide, associated
The length
of ECoG
and
cal outcome
varied
post-operative
with fentanyl recordings
showed EEGs,
epileptiform but
similar
discharges
on
abnormalities
from 15 to 25 min.
were seen in the EEGs
Follow-up scalp EEGs were performed between 7 and 15 days after surgery in all patients, except in
been seizure free since surgery (Table 2). Surgical outcome was 62.5% class I (seizure
two
2
free), 25% class II (rare seizures),
1
III [9].
who
had
the
first
post-operative
months after the operation. Five patients year follow-up EEG recordings.
EEG had
Surgical outcome was assessed based on serial follow-up visits with the patient and family members. The outcome was classified according to Engel’s scale [9]. The mean post-operative follow-up was 27.5 months (ranging from 8 to 96 months). All but one patient had at least 12 months followup. 3. Results Table
1 summarizes
the
patient
demographic
data. The preoperative EEGs revealed a unilateral, or predominantly unilateral temporal lobe interictal epileptic abnormality, maximal over the mid and inferomesial temporal region. At least three of the patient’s habitual seizures were recorded. All had exclusively or predominantly unilateral seizure onset maximal over mesial temporal lobe regions (sphenoidal electrodes). MRI studies showed atrophy and/or abnormal T2 signal in the mesial temporal structures in all but two patients. The ECoG before the resection showed a variable ampunt of interictal spiking from the depth, either independently or synchronously with the surface electrodes. After the selective removal of mesial temporal structures, an increase in epileptiform abnormality was observed in all patients and a different pattern of ECoG emerged. This consisted of repetitive, high amplitude spikes and polyspikes separated by attenuated background, maximal over the anterior temporal region (see Figs. l-3). The follow-up EEGs showed no interictal epileptiform abnormalities in eight (50%) patients, and occasional epileptiform discharges in four (25%). Frequent epileptiform abnormality was recorded in the remaining four (25%) patients, and in two of them, 1 year follow-up recordings showed no epileptiform discharges. Patients with poor surgi-
of those patients
who had
and 12.5% class
4. Discussion Several studies assessed the value of ECoG in outlining the region of epileptogenic tissue to be resected during anterior temporal lobe removal and extra-temporal corticectomies, and in predicting the outcome of surgery. However, the results of studies somewhat contradictory these are [2,4,6,8,10,18,23,26,28,29]. Two important questions about ECoG are still to be answered: (a) the relation between post-resection epileptiform abnormalities and surgical outcome, and (b) when and how much additional cortex should be removed in the presence of post-resection epileptiform abnormalities. Different studies agree that patients with good surgical outcome show residual spikes less often after anterior temporal lobe resection as compared to those patients with poor surgical outcome. However, this difference is found to be statistically significant in some studies but not in others. In all studies there are patients with epileptiform abnormalities on post-resection ECoG that become seizure free after operation and vice versa. This complex issue may perhaps be explained by different underlying pathological mechanisms. This can be exemplified by an early study, in which Jasper et al. [16] found a good correlation between ECoG and operative results. The persistence of epileptiform abnormalities predicted poor surgical outcome in 75% of patients. When they described three of the exceptions, namely patients who received a poor ECoG prognosis and yet showed a good clinical result, it became apparent that one patient had had prolonged febrile convulsions, involving the right hemibody and followed by right hemiparesis at the age of 11 months, and the other two had well delimited posttraumatic lesions resected. Those two conditions are known to lead to good surgical outcome for seizure control. This illustrates that the prognostic
198
199
200
c
202
203
204
TABLE 2 ECoG and follow-up EEG results pt f#
Interietal EEG pre-operativea
EC&
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R 9 10 11 12
right TL right TL BiT right > left left TL BiT left > right right TL right TL BiT leftlright right TL left TL left TL left TL left TL right TL BiT right z left left TL
HF AM, NC HF, NC AM, HF, NC +AM, HF, NC AM, HF. NC AM AM, f HF AM, HF, NC AM, HF. NC AM, HF, NC AM, HF, NC
few SSW Lt TL NEA very frequent EA Rt TL NEA NEA occasional EA Lt TL frequent EA Lt TL occasional EA Lt TL NEA
AM, HF. NC
NEA
AM, HF AM, HF, NC + AM, HF. NC
NEA NEA
13 14 I5 lb
(4: 1) (5: I)
(5~1)
(3:I)
before resection”
EEG post-op. (S--15 days)
Follow-up EEG (I 2 months)
Follow-up
EEG
1 year
NEA few SSW Rt TL NEA NEA
NEA NEA
NEA
NEA
NEA
NEA occasional
EA Rt TL
occasional
EA Rt TL
few SSW Lt TL
“Interictal epiieptiform abnormalities were considered to be unilateral when occurring in one side more than 90% of the time during wakefulness. All patients had exclusively or predominantly unilateral ictal EEG onset over mid and inferomesial temporal regions. bLocalization of epileptiform spikes. The post-resection ECoG showed more intense spiking over the anterior temporal neocortex in all patients. AM = amygdata, HF = hippocampal formation, NC = neocortex, + AM = more intense spiking over the amygdata region; + HF = more intense spiking over the hippocampai region. NEA ==no epileptiform abnormality; EA = epileptiform abnormality; few SSW = EEG with fewer than five slow sharp waves, not definitely epileptifo~. Rt = right, Lt = left, TL = temporal lobe.
value of ECoG will be better defined only when analyzed in relation to underlying clinico-pathological conditions. In temporal lobe epilepsy, patients with proven mesial sclerosis should be analyzed separately from those with small cortical lesions [12] or neuronal migration disorders [25]. Patients with dual pathology [3,19] should not be included in either of these two groups. Very little has been reported about ECoG in selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy, since no cortical removal is contemplated during this procedure. Niemeyer originally described that the ECoG surprisingly worsened in patients who had a selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy, but in early post-operative scalp EEGs this abnormality then disappeared [21]. We found that all patients in the present study showed consistent worsening of ECoG, with very frequent epileptifo~ discharges. This finding, however, did not correlate with the surgical outcome. Activation of spikes after cortical resection is a
well-known phenomenon, though this is not very frequent after anterior temporal lobe removal [ 1,13,23,29]. Post-resection ECoG sharp waves and spikes may represent transient response to injury, but this alone is unlikely to explain the consistent increase in spiking following selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy, since the injury caused during this procedure is less than that due to temporal lobe removal en bloc. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is the acute disconnection of pathways between the lateral cortex and mesial structures, especially the amygdala. Suppression-burst activity from isolated cerebral cortex has been previously described [7,14,15]. In 1950 Henry [ 14] reported electrocorticograms of 25 patients before, during and after several different types of lobotomy. Following the section or undercutting there was a reduction in the amount and voltage of frontal fast activity and an increase in large slow waves, resulting in a fairly characteristic pattern of rhythmic bursts of fast activity separated by variably long periods of ‘flat’ record. In
205
a subsequent cluded judged
study
that
the
Henry
and Scoville
suppression-burst
from its continued
[15] con-
activity,
presence
as
at the time of
repeat operations, persisted over a year in the electrocorticogram of undercut cortex, but was not detected in the scalp EEG. Echlin et al. [7] reported paroxysmal high voltage discharges from isolated
and partially
isolated
human
and animal
ment of temporal 5 Cendes,
F.. Andermann,
metric measurements
experience have not fully clarified the relevance of ECoG findings in relation to outcome of surgical treatment of epilepsy.
Neurology,
Kufta,
F., Gloor.
of amygdala
18 (1968) 17-
O., Canevini,
M.P.,
C.V. and Theodore,
cography
VOIU-
P. et al., MRI
and hippocampus
in tem-
Neurology, 43 (1993) 719-725.
poral lobe epilepsy, 6 Devinsky,
in patients
Sato,
W.H.,
S., Bromlield,
Quantitative
undergoing
E.B.,
electrocorti-
temporal
lobectomy,
J.
Epilepsy, 5 (1992) 178-185. 7 Echlin.
cerebral cortex. They found that this phenomenon appeared fundamentally the same in humans and animals whether from areas of frontal, parietal or temporal cortex, and that “with partial isolation the background activity became suppressed and bursts or spindles . . were more evident”. They also concluded that injury as well as ischemia may play a part but not the most important one, because one would expect more erratic discharges arising first at one cut surface, then at another. On the contrary this activity was very consistent, both in pattern and quantitatively, and was absent in the immediately neighboring cortex [7]. Although the mechanism for activation of neocortical spikes after selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy is yet to be clarified, the clinical signiticance of these spikes certainly differs from those observed after anterior temporal lobe removal en bloc or extra-temporal neocortical resection. Different underlying mechanisms, depending on the cerebral localization, type of pathology and surgical approach, may explain why 55 years of clinical
lobe epileptics,
31.
F.A., Arnett,
tage discharges and animal
V. and Zoll, J., Paroxysmal
from isolated
cerebral
and partially
high vol-
isolated
human
Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophy-
cortex,
siol., 4 (1952) 147-164. 8 Engel, J., Driver, logical
M.V. and Falconer,
correlates
of pathology
M.A., Electrophysioresults
and surgical
in tem-
Brain, 98 (1975) 129- 156.
poral lobe epilepsy,
9 Engel, J. Jr., Outcome
with respect to epileptic
seizures.
In:
J. Engel Jr., (Ed.), Surgicul Treatment of the Epilepsies, Raven Press, New York, NY, 1987, pp. 553~571. IO Engel, J. Jr., Approaches
to localization
of the epileptogenic
lesion. In: J. Engel Jr., (Ed.). Surgical Treatment qf the Epilepsies. Raven Press, New York, I1 Falconer,
M.A.,
Discussion.
NY. 1987. pp. 75-95.
In: M. Baldwin
(Ed%), Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, Charles
and P. Bailey
C Thomas,
Spring-
field, IL, 1958, pp. 483484. 12 Fish, D.R., Andermann, seizures
and
structural
small
F. and Olivier, A., Complex
posterior
lesions:
surgical
partial
temporal
or extratemporal
management.
Neurology,
41
(1991) 178lll784. I3 Gloor,
P., Contributions
electrocorticography epilepsies.
In: D.P. Purpura,
Neurosurgical
(Eds.),
of electroencephalography
to the neurosurgical J.K.
Penry
Manugement
and
treatment and
of the
R.D.
Walter
of the Epilepsies. Ad-
wnces of Neurology, Vol. X, Raven
Press, New York,
NY,
1975, pp. 599105. 14 Henry,
C.E., Observations
activity
of deafferented
on alternating
burst-suppression
Electroenceph.
cortex,
Clin. Neuro-
phJ,siol., 2 (1950) 232. I5 Henry. from
C.E. and Scoville, isolated
cerebral
W.B., Suppression-burst
cortex
activity
Electroenreph.
in man.
Clin.
Neurophysiol.. I (1952) ll22.
References I Ajmone-Marsan,
C., Electrocorticography.
In: A. Remond
Handbook
of Electroencephalography
and Clinical
Neurophysiology,
Vol IO, Part C, Elsevier,
Amsterdam,
(Ed.),
of EEG and cortical
nosis of seizures following
I.A.. Rosenfeld, epilepsy
J.. Ahl, J., Hahn, and structural
Mapping, resection strategies, sio, 32 (1991) 179m-186. 3 Babb, T.L., Lieb, J.P., Brown, dall, P.H., Distribution
H.. Pertuisset,
and Stephens,
M., Prognostic
Epilep-
J. and Cran-
cell density and hyperhippocampal
P., Dussault,
in the surgical
J.
treat-
T., Eva-
studies for prog-
excision
B. and Flanigin,
Neural. Psychiutry, 65 18 Kadanova,
of epileptogenic
seizure
19 Levesque.
M.F.,
extrahippocampal
lobe seizures,
Arch.
(1951) 272- 299.
Y., Kanner,
temporal (abstract).
H., EEG and cortical
with temporal A.M.,
tive value of postresection
T.L., Surgical
T., Gioor, factors
formation,
surgical
in patients
EEGs in predicting W.J., Pretorius,
of pyramidal
Rasmussen,
lesions of the brain:
and seizure outcome,
excitability in the epileptic human Epileppsiu,25 (1984) 72 I- 728. A.R.A.,
J.F. and Luders,
G. and Rasmussen, electrographic
lesions, Epilepsiu, 2 (1961) 130-I 37. electrograms
H., Intractable
4 Bengzon,
H., Arfel-Capdevielle,
luation
17 Jasper,
1973. 2 Awad,
16 Jasper,
Morrel.
ECoG
seizure outcome
and
F. et al., ComparaI O-day postoperative
in patients
foci. Epilepsia, 33 Suppl. Nakasato,
treatment lesions:
N.. Vinters.
H.V.
of limbic epilepsy the problem
J. Neurosurg.. 75 (1991) 364370.
with antero-
3 (1992) 88889 and
associated
Babb, with
of dual pathology,
206
20 Morris,
A.A., Temporal
cus, hippocampus 76
lobectomy
and amygdala,
with removal
of the un-
Arch. Neural. Psychiatry,
(1956)479496.
21 Niemeyer,
lobe epilepsy.
amygdala-hippocampect-
insular
In: M. Baldwin and P. Bailey
(Eds.), Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, Charles
C Thomas,
Spring-
field, IL, 1958, pp. 461482. 22 Niemeyer, temporal
lobe epilepsy.
Microsurgical
in
Elwcerpta
technique,
Med., 293 (1973) 20 (abstract). 23 Ojemann, cranial Surgical
and
stimulation.
In: J. Engel
Treatment of’ the Epilepsies, Raven
intra-
Jr. (Ed.),
Press.
New
24 Olivier, A., Cukiert, cortical
A. and Andermann,
amygdalo-hippocampectomy.
and preliminary
results,
F., Selective transSurgical
technique
Can. J. Neural. Sci., 19 (1992) 267
25 Palmini, migration
A.. Andermann, disorders:
F.. Olivier,
a contribution
A. et al., Neuronal of modern
neuroima-
Can. .I. Netrrol.
treatment
T., Evaluation
of temporal
ol
lobe epi-
L.F.. Abou-Khalil, in temporal
B. and Olivier. A..
lobe
epilepsy
surgery.
Acru Neural. Scar&, 83 (1991) 65- 72. 28 Tran. T.A., Spencer, Spencer.
S.S., Javidan,
M.. Pacia, S., Marks,
D.. Electrocorticography.
electrocorticographic
I. Significance
spikes in mesiotemporal
epilepsy,
D. of Epi-
Iepsia, 33 Suppl. 3 (1992) 89 (abstract). 29 Walker,
A.E., Lichtenstein,
R.S. and Marshall,
of electrocorticography
in temporal
C., A critical lobe epilepsy,
Arch. Neurol., 2 (1960) 172 182. 30 Watson, basis
C., Andermann.
of amygdaloid
ment by magnetic
(abstract).
P. and Rasmussen,
in surgical
H., Quesney,
analysis
York, NY, 1987, pp. 263-268.
of epilepsy,
lepsy, Epilepsia. 5 (1964) 307-320. 27 Stefan.
and
G.A. and Engel, J. Jr.. Acute and chronic recording
H., Gloor,
ablation
Electrocorticogrdphy
P. and Bello, P., Amygdalo-hippocampectomy
dragnosis
Sci., 18 (1991) 58&m587. 26 Silfvenius,
P., The transventricular
omy in temporal
ging to the etiologic
1743~ 1750.
and resonance
F., Gloor, hippocampal imaging,
P. et al.. Anatomic volume
measure-
Neurolog,~. 42 (1992)