Accepted Manuscript Individual Placement and Support in Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Observational Study of Employment Outcomes Lisa Ottomanelli, PhD, Lance L. Goetz, MD, Scott D. Barnett, PhD, Eni Njoh, MPH, Thomas M. Dixon, PhD, ABPP, Sally Ann Holmes, MD, James LePage, PhD, Doug Ota, MD, Sunil Sabharwal, MD, Kevin T. White, MD PII:
S0003-9993(17)30012-6
DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.010
Reference:
YAPMR 56769
To appear in:
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Received Date: 6 May 2016 Revised Date:
7 December 2016
Accepted Date: 10 December 2016
Please cite this article as: Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL, Barnett SD, Njoh E, Dixon TM, Holmes SA, LePage J, Ota D, Sabharwal S, White KT, Individual Placement and Support in Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Observational Study of Employment Outcomes, ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.010. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT APMR D-16-00556R2 Running head: IPS in SCI
Individual Placement and Support in Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Observational
RI PT
Study of Employment Outcomes
Lisa Ottomanelli, PhD1,2 ; Lance L. Goetz, MD3,4; Scott D. Barnett, PhD1; Eni Njoh,
SC
MPH1; Thomas M. Dixon, PhD, ABPP5; Sally Ann Holmes, MD6; James LePage,
M AN U
PhD7,8; Doug Ota, MD9,10; Sunil Sabharwal, MD11,12; Kevin T. White, MD1
1. VA HSR&D Center of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (CINDRR), James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL
2. Department of Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling, University of South Florida,
TE D
Tampa, FL
3. Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA 4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University,
EP
Richmond, VA
5. Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
AC C
6. Michael E. DeBakey VAMC, Houston, TX 7. VA North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, TX 8. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School 9. VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 10. Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Stanford University, Stanford CA. 11. VA Boston Health Care System, Boston, MA 12. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT IPS in SCI / APMR D-16-00556R1
Page 2
Acknowledgement of Financial Support: This material is based on work supported by
RI PT
the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Project #O7824R.
Conflict of Interest and Disclaimer: The authors have no conflicts of interests.
SC
Contents of this article do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs
M AN U
or the United States Government.
Address correspondence to: Lisa Ottomanelli, PhD, James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital, 8900 Grand Oak Circle, Tampa, FL 33637. Telephone, (813) 558-3917.
TE D
[email protected]. Reprints are not available.
Clinical Trial Number: NCT01141647
EP
Acknowledgements: We wish to acknowledge the following site investigators: Herb Ames, PhD; Maggie Budd, PhD, ABPP; Kirsten Fisher, MD; Anthony Kerrigan, PhD; B.
AC C
Jenny Kiratli, PhD; Melissa Amick, PhD; Scott McDonald, PhD; Fides Pacheco, MD; Mary Ann Richmond, MD; Catherine Wilson PsyD, ABPP; and the Compensated Work Therapy program managers and study team members who supported this work. We acknowledge the dedicated efforts of fidelity monitors, Richard Toscano, MEd, and Charles McGeough, MSW, the National SE Clinical Coordinator, and Virginia “Jennie” Keleher, MSW, along with our study executive committee and staff at the HSR&D
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT IPS in SCI / APMR D-16-00556R1
Page 3
CINDRR. We appreciate the editorial assistance of Lynn Dirk, MAMC, in the
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
preparation of this manuscript.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
1
Title:
2
Individual Placement and Support in Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Observational
3
Study of Employment Outcomes.
RI PT
1
4 5
Abstract
6 Objective
8
To determine the effects of a 24-month program of Individual Placement and Support
9
(IPS) supported employment (SE) on employment outcomes for veterans with spinal cord
M AN U
10
SC
7
injury (SCI).
11 Design
13
Longitudinal, observational multi-site study of a single arm, non-randomized cohort.
14
TE D
12
Setting
16
SCI centers in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (n=7).
EP
15
17 Participants
19
Veterans with SCI (n=213) enrolled during an episode of either inpatient hospital care
20
(24.4%) or outpatient care (75.6%). More than half the sample (59.2%) had a history of
21
traumatic brain injury (TBI).
AC C
18
22
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
23
Intervention(s)
24
IPS SE for 24 months.
2
26
Main Outcome Measure(s)
27
Competitive employment (CE).
RI PT
25
28 Results
30
Over the 24-month period, 92 of the entire sample of 213 IPS participants obtained
31
competitive jobs for an overall employment rate of 43.2%. For the subsample of
32
participants without TBI enrolled as outpatients (n=69), 36 obtained competitive jobs for
33
an overall employment rate of 52.2%. Overall, employed participants averaged 38.2 ±
34
29.7 weeks of employment, with an average time to first employment of 348.3 ± 220.0
35
days. Nearly 25% of 1st jobs occurred within 4 to 6 months of beginning the program.
36
Similar employment characteristics were observed in the subsample without TBI histories
37
enrolled as outpatients.
EP
38
TE D
M AN U
SC
29
Conclusion(s)
40
Almost half of the veterans with SCI participating in the 24-month IPS program as part of
41
their ongoing SCI care achieved CE, consistent with their expressed preferences at the
42
start of the study. Among a sub-sample of veterans without any TBI history enrolled as
43
outpatients, employment rates exceeded 50%. Time to first employment was highly
44
variable, but quite long in many instances. These findings support offering continued IPS
45
services as part of ongoing SCI care to achieve positive employment outcomes.
AC C
39
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
3
46 Key words: Employment, Supported; Spinal Cord Injuries; Veterans; Rehabilitation,
48
Vocational
49
RI PT
47
List of Abbreviations
51
CE
competitive employment
52
CWT
Compensated Work Therapy
53
IDT
Interdisciplinary Treatment Team
54
IRB
Institutional Review Board
55
IPS
Individual Placement and Support
56
NEPEC
Northeast Program Evaluation Center
57
RCT
Randomized Controlled Trial
58
SE
Supported Employment
59
SCI
Spinal Cord Injury
60
SCI-VIP
Spinal Cord Injury Vocational Integration Program
61
TBI
Traumatic Brain Injury
62
US
United States
63
VAMC
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
64
VAP
Vocational Assessment Profile
65
VHA
Veterans Health Administration
66
VRS
Vocational Rehabilitation Specialist
67
VR
Vocational Rehabilitation
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
50
68
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
4
Since the early days of spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation, employment has widely
70
been accepted as a primary goal of rehabilitation.1 This perspective continues today as
71
community reintegration has increasingly become a focus of rehabilitation.2,3 This
72
emphasis is well justified, as employment is associated with improvements in health,
73
well-being, quality of life, and social inclusion.4–6 Employment is associated with living
74
not only a more satisfying life, but also a longer life. Over 40 years of longitudinal
75
research have shown that longevity following SCI is strongly associated with
76
employment.7 Not surprisingly, occupation is one of the highest priority needs expressed
77
by persons with SCI.8 Despite this recognition, research on effective employment
78
interventions for persons with SCI remains in the early stages of development. Expected
79
employment outcomes from vocational treatment have not been established in the field,
80
and the majority of persons with SCI do not return to employment following injury.9
SC
M AN U
TE D
81
RI PT
69
Cross-sectional research renders a wealth of information on predictors of employment
83
following SCI,10–13 but prospective data on best practices for addressing vocational issues
84
and establishing benchmarks for evaluating outcomes of traditional vocational
85
rehabilitation (VR) programs and other approaches in SCI care are needed. Indeed,
86
published reports on employment and SCI often cite employment rates without
87
describing what vocational rehabilitation programs and which specific vocational
88
services may have been received by the sample. 10-13 Hence, understanding the
89
relationship between vocational interventions and expected employment outcomes is
90
challenging. Moreover, there is virtually no published information comparing the
91
effectiveness of different vocational interventions in SCI. Two recent systematic reviews
AC C
EP
82
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
5
determined that there is a profound lack of interventional studies on employment.14,15
93
These reviews concluded that the strongest evidence for an effective vocational
94
intervention in SCI was a single randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Individual
95
Placement and Support (IPS) Supported Employment: the Spinal Cord Injury-Vocational
96
Integration Program (SCI-VIP).16 This RCT achieved superior employment outcomes for
97
IPS in SCI centers compared with the conventional practice of referring veterans with
98
SCI to traditional VR outside the SCI center. Whether the employment outcomes seen in
99
SCI-VIP represent what could be expected if IPS were a routine part of usual clinical care
SC
for SCI has yet to be determined.
101
M AN U
100
RI PT
92
The intervention used in the SCI-VIP trial was the Individual Placement and Support
103
(IPS) approach to Supported Employment (SE).17,18 Supported employment emerged in
104
the 1980s as a vocational intervention to provide ongoing job supports to persons with
105
psychiatric disabilities. Over the next two decades, IPS became the most studied and
106
standardized approach of using SE to help persons with disabilities find competitive
107
employment (CE) in their communities in line with consumer-driven preferences. IPS is a
108
direct service with multiple components, including rapid job search, integration of
109
rehabilitation services, job development, benefits counseling, and follow-along supports
110
to sustain employment.19 Unlike more traditional models, which consist of pre-vocational
111
activities or work readiness and which deliver vocational services by means of ad hoc
112
referrals to external vocational rehabilitation agencies, the IPS model follows a “zero
113
exclusion” principle, meaning that severity of disability is not a factor in eligibility and
AC C
EP
TE D
102
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
6
114
care is delivered using an integrated team-based model in which a vocational
115
rehabilitation specialist (VRS) is a member of the health care team.
RI PT
116 The SCI-VIP study was the first test of an IPS-based SE program in a population of
118
persons with a physical disability. In brief, SCI-VIP was a 5-year (2005-2010)
119
randomized, controlled, multisite trial of IPS versus referral to traditional VR with 12
120
months of follow-up, and the main outcome was CE of veterans with SCI.20 Results
121
demonstrated that veterans with SCI randomized to 12 months of IPS were 2.5 times
122
more likely to obtain CE than those in the traditional VR control condition and were 11.5
123
times more likely to be employed than veterans followed at observational sites where IPS
124
was not offered. Veterans who obtained employment had significantly greater social
125
participation, home and community mobility, and time spent in productive roles.21 A
126
subset of SCI-VIP study participants was then followed for up to 2 years, during which
127
time employment data were collected and follow-along support was available on an “as
128
needed” basis. The IPS employment rate remained significantly higher than the
129
traditional VR in year 2.22 Those who received IPS also worked more hours and earned
130
more wages than those who received traditional VR.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
131
SC
117
132
Despite the positive outcomes in SCI-VIP, the mean employment rate of 25.9% for
133
veterans with SCI who received a 12-month IPS program is less than the employment
134
rates reported in studies of IPS for persons with serious mental illness. A recent
135
systematic review reported a mean employment rate of 58.9% across 16 RCTs that were
136
published between 1996-2012, with a mean follow-up of 18.8 months of IPS for serious
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
7
mental illness.23 The medical complexity of the population in SCI-VIP, which included a
138
significant proportion of co-morbid physical, cognitive, and/or psychiatric impairments
139
likely contributed to employment outcomes being lower than those reported for persons
140
with psychiatric disabilities, and we suspected that a longer IPS program may be needed
141
to reach higher employment outcomes in this population. We believed that a higher
142
employment rate would be observed with a longer implementation period that offered
143
continuous availability of the full IPS intervention for persons with chronic SCI. The
144
present paper describes the employment outcomes of a 24-month IPS program integrated
145
with SCI clinical care in 7 SCI centers in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) .
M AN U
SC
RI PT
137
146 147 Methods
149 150 151
Subjects and settings
TE D
148
The Predictive Outcome Model Over Time for Employment (PrOMOTE) was a
153
longitudinal field study that extended the work of SCI-VIP, methods of which have been
154
published previously.20 PrOMOTE was a 5-year (2010-2015) prospective, non-
155
randomized, single-arm, multi-site project evaluating longitudinal employment, quality of
156
life, and economic outcomes among a large cohort of veterans with SCI receiving
157
medical and/or rehabilitation care from interdisciplinary care teams at 7 participating VA
158
SCI centers located in geographically diverse sectors of the United States (3 of the 7
159
PrOMOTE sites had also participated in SCI-VIP). The study had IRB approval at all
AC C
EP
152
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
8
sites. PrOMOTE consisted of two parallel studies: a large scale survey of health,
161
employment, and quality of life among a representative sample of veterans with SCI and
162
a longitudinal, observational study of a 24-month IPS program, which is the focus of the
163
present report. The primary aims of the observational study were to determine the effect
164
of IPS on employment rate, quality of life, and health care utilization. This paper reports
165
on the employment outcomes.
RI PT
160
SC
166
All veterans who met inclusion criteria were approached about completing a baseline
168
interview to gather information on employment, health, and quality of life after SCI.
169
Inclusion criteria for the baseline interview included: (1) between the ages of 18 and 65
170
years old, (2) medically and neurologically stable, (3) enrolled in VHA, and (4) have a
171
SCI. To be eligible to enroll in IPS, veterans had to meet the additional criteria of (1) not
172
currently working in a paying job in the community, (2) express a desire for employment,
173
and (3) live within 100 miles of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Veterans
174
with untreated psychosis, untreated alcohol or drug dependence, or a terminal illness
175
were ineligible for IPS. Both inpatients and outpatients were eligible to enroll in IPS.
176
Our broad inclusion criteria allowed for the enrollment of a heterogeneous sample, to
177
reflect the common clinical characteristic of veterans with SCI who receive inpatient
178
and/or outpatient treatment in the VHA SCI system of care throughout their lifespan. In
179
this paper, we first report outcomes for the entire sample of participants with SCI, and
180
then report outcomes for a subsample of participants with SCI and no TBI history that
181
enrolled in the study and began IPS as outpatients. The latter description is provided as
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
167
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
9
182
an illustrative example of the potential influence of treatment setting (and timing of
183
intervention) and a common potentially influential co-morbidity (TBI) on outcomes.
RI PT
184 Of 279 veterans enrolled in IPS in PrOMOTE (Figure 1), 213 had no previous exposure
186
to IPS through SCI-VIP while 66 had prior exposure to IPS because they served as study
187
participants in SCI-VIP and were randomized either to IPS (n=30) or to traditional VR
188
(n=36). Since SCI-VIP was not a blinded study, for purposes of the present study’s
189
analysis of PrOMOTE employment outcomes, we conservatively included only those
190
PrOMOTE study participants who had not served in the SCI-VIP trial (n=213).
191
The 2-year rate of attrition was 21.6% (n=46), the majority of whom were lost during
192
year 1 (71.7%, n=33). Reasons for attrition were: subject withdrawal (39.1%, n=18),
193
death (19.6%, n=9), moved (13.0%, n=6), discharged or ineligible for VHA compensated
194
work therapy (CWT) and/or SCI services (10.9%, n=5), incarcerated or facility safety and
195
security restrictions (8.7%, n=3), terminal illness (2.2%, n=1), lost to follow-up (4.4%,
196
n=2), and unknown (4.4%, n=2). An examination of demographic and clinical differences
197
between subjects lost to follow-up and completing the study revealed no meaningful
198
differences.
200
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
199
SC
185
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
201
10
Intervention
202 The intervention used in the PrOMOTE study was the IPS approach to SE used in the
204
SCI-VIP RCT as described earlier. For a detailed description of the IPS SE intervention,
205
readers are referred to the SCI-VIP methods paper.20 For a quick reference to how the
206
foundational IPS principles24 were applied in the SCI centers, see Table 1.
RI PT
203
SC
207
The IPS program was delivered by a VRS who received training both in IPS and in SCI
209
specific medical management and rehabilitation. At each of the 7 participating SCI
210
centers, the VRS was integrated as a provider into the SCI interdisciplinary care team.
211
With the team’s support, the VRS provided a full continuum of IPS, which commonly
212
included essential services such as vocational assessment and planning, job development,
213
job placement, and follow-along support. A full list of services and their definitions are
214
provided in the supplemental material. Throughout the study, implementation of IPS was
215
supported by ongoing trainings, written manuals, and biannual fidelity monitoring (i.e.,
216
audit and feedback on adherence to the IPS model). Also, a National IPS Clinical
217
Coordinator provided ongoing technical assistance to all the VRSs.
218
Outcomes
219
The primary outcome was CE, meaning a job paying at least minimum wage in the
220
community and available to any qualified person. Therefore, volunteer work and
221
sheltered employment did not qualify as employment for this study. Secondary outcomes
222
of interest were wages earned, hours worked, duration of employment, and other
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
208
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
11
223
characteristics of employment (e.g., time to first job, job endings, job type). Duration of
224
employment and wages earned over the 2 years were measured in weeks.
RI PT
225 226 227
Measures
228
The following data were obtained through interviews and medical chart extraction: socio-
230
demographics (self-reported race/ethnicity, sex, date of birth, and educational level), date
231
of SCI, medical and psychiatric co-morbidities, financial information, and information on
232
benefits received from the VHA and from Social Security. Employment history was
233
categorized as follows: (a) employment at time of SCI and (b) employment within the
234
immediate 5 years prior to study enrollment and (c) any employment post SCI. The Ohio
235
State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method (OSU-TBI-ID) was used
236
to identify subjects with TBI.25 Participants were provided job journals to record their
237
weekly employment activity (employment onset, duration, wages, and job
238
classifications).This information was collected at quarterly interviews conducted by site
239
research coordinators.
240
The Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Fidelity Scale26 was used to measure
241
adherence to the SE model. The Fidelity Scale consists of 15 items in three domains:
242
staffing (3 items), organization (7 items), and services (5 items). Each item is rated on a
243
scale of 1 to 5, higher numbers indicating better adherence to IPS (1 = poor, 2-3 = fair,
244
4-5 = good). The total score for the scale is calculated by summing the item values
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
229
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
12
(range: 15-75). A score > 65 is good IPS implementation; 56-65 is fair IPS
246
implementation; and < 56 is not consistent with IPS. The published internal consistency
247
coefficient for the instrument is .83, and subscale coefficients have ranged from .55 to
248
.70.27 The Fidelity Scale was completed every 6 months by experts who conducted site
249
visits and based ratings on interviews with staff, veterans, and employers and on medical
250
chart reviews.
RI PT
245
SC
251
253
M AN U
252 Sample size
254
Using results from the prior randomized trial,16 we calculated that 174 participants would
256
be needed to demonstrate 80% power to detect an increase in employment rate from
257
25.9% to 38.0% using a two-sided binomial test. These results assumed that the veteran
258
SCI population employment rate under the null hypothesis was 25.9%. To account for
259
expected attrition, we increased our sample size goal by 20% from 174 to 211.
260
Statistical analysis
EP
AC C
261
TE D
255
262
Continuous parameters are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and discrete
263
parameters as percent (%). The primary outcome of interest was rate of competitive
264
employment, presented as percent employed per group with 95% Wald confidence
265
intervals (CI) with normal approximation. Employment rate was defined as the number of
266
obtained jobs (1 per participant in the case of multiple employments) divided by the total
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
13
number of participants. Secondary outcomes reported were wages earned, hours worked,
268
duration of employment, and other employment characteristics (e.g., time to first job, job
269
endings, job type). Missing data, approximately 1-2%, for medical and clinical data were
270
minimized through the use of forced option data capture methods (i.e., item response
271
selection during data entry is restricted to a predetermined range of responses) embedded
272
within our electronic database. Missing data, approximately 5%, for vocational
273
information collected regarding salary was excluded from analysis. No imputation was
274
performed. For secondary outcomes, data were explored for departures from normality by
275
standard descriptive statistics. Group comparisons were made with Student’s t-test or
276
Wilcoxon rank sum tests with normal approximation, where appropriate, for continuous
277
data and Pearson chi-square test, or Fisher’s Exact Test, where appropriate, for
278
categorical data. All analyses were performed with SAS (Ver. 9.4, Cary, NC).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
267
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
279
14
Results
280 Subject characteristics
282
Participant characteristics are presented in Table 2. Participants (n=213) were primarily
283
male (96.7%), aged 51.0 ± 10.1 years (mean), and Caucasian (55.4%). At the time of
284
study enrollment and baseline interview, 24.4% were hospital inpatients and 75.6% were
285
outpatients. It should be noted that inpatient and outpatient status were not static
286
conditions, as subsequent to enrollment participants may have experienced hospital
287
discharges or admissions during the 24 month study period. Less than half of participants
288
(47.9%) received any VHA benefits or service-connected benefits for SCI (22.5%). On
289
average, participants received less than $1,000 per month ($946 ± $640) in non-service
290
connected benefits, $837 ± $463 in Social Security Income (SSI), and $1,242 ± 460 in
291
Social Security Disability Income (SSDI). At the baseline interview, most participants
292
(63%) reported that they wanted to work part time, on average 26.9 hours per week.
295 296
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
294
Medical and mental health characteristics
AC C
293
RI PT
281
297
Participant medical characteristics are presented in Table 3. Nearly half of participants
298
reported cause of injury as either vehicular accident (29.1%) or fall (20.2%). When
299
completeness and neurologic level of injury were combined to reflect varying impairment
300
levels, 9.9% (n=21) of the sample had high tetraplegia with American Spinal Injury
301
Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B, or C; 17.4% (n=37) had low tetraplegia
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
15
with AIS grade A, B, or C; 27.2% (n=58) had paraplegia with AIS grade A, B, or C; and
303
44.6% (n=95) had AIS grade D/E regardless of neurologic level. The majority of
304
participants had bowel (72.3 %) or bladder (77.0%) impairments; many also had other
305
medical conditions including spasticity (42.3%), hypertension (35.2%), pain (29.1%), and
306
pressure ulcers (20.7%). More than half the sample (59.2%) had a lifetime history of
307
traumatic brain injury as identified by the OSU-TBI-ID. Over one-third of the sample had
308
depression (35.2%), and nearly 20% had substance abuse.
309
Fidelity assessments
310
Overall site fidelity scores were 65.0 ± 3.7 (range: 40-75), representing good
311
implementation, with average scores across visits in the good range for 5 sites and the fair
312
range for 2 sites.
SC
314
318
EP
317
Employment rate, duration, wages and job classifications
Entire sample (n=213)
AC C
316
M AN U
TE D
313
315
RI PT
302
319
During the 24-month study follow-up period, 92 of 213 participants obtained competitive
320
jobs for an overall employment rate of 43.2% (36.9%-50.2%) (Table 4). Twenty three of
321
the 92 participants obtained more than one job during the study period. On average,
322
subjects worked 15.1 ± 13.1 hours per week. While the majority (n =77, 83.6%) worked
323
part time, 16.3% (n=15) achieved full time employment (greater than 32 hours per week). 15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
16
On average, subjects earned $265 ± $348 per week. Duration of employment averaged
325
38.2 ± 29.7 weeks. The average time to first employment was 348.3 ± 220.0 days, and
326
nearly 25% of first jobs were obtained within 4 to 6 months. Of the 115 jobs obtained, 52
327
(45.2%) ended during the 2-year study. Of the 92 IPS participants who obtained jobs, for
328
45 participants the job ended during the 24-month study follow-up period. Of these, 19
329
subsequently worked 1 or more jobs while 26 obtained no further job during the study
330
follow-up period. Of the 92 participants gaining employment, over half worked in
331
management, business, science, and arts (36.6%) or sales and office (27.2%) jobs, while
332
only a few participants (6.1%) worked in natural resources, construction, or maintenance.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
324
333 334
336
Subsample of participants without TBI enrolled as outpatients (n=69)
TE D
335
Of IPS participants who were enrolled during outpatient care, 69 did not have any history
338
of TBI (mild, moderate, or severe) on the OSU-TBI-ID. During the 24-month study
339
follow-up period, 36 of these 69 participants obtained 58 competitive jobs for an overall
340
employment rate of 52.2% (40.4%-63.8%). On average, subjects worked 15.4 ± 13.6
341
hours per week. While the majority (n=30, 83.4%) worked part time, 16.6% (n=6)
342
achieved full time employment (greater than 32 hours per week). On average, subjects
343
earned $244 ± $332 per week, or an annualized salary of $12,688 (range, $29-$85,228).
344
Duration of employment averaged 40.4 ± 31.7 weeks. The average time to first
345
employment was 312.5 ± 227.0 days, and nearly 47.4% of first jobs were obtained within
346
4 to 6 months. Of the 58 jobs obtained, 26 (44.8%) ended during the 2-year study. Of the
AC C
EP
337
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
17
36 IPS participants who obtained jobs, for 7 (19.4%), the job ended during the 24-month
348
study follow-up period. Of these, 1 subsequently worked 1 or more jobs while 6 obtained
349
no further job during the study follow-up period. Of the 36 participants gaining
350
employment, over half worked in management, business, science, and arts (44.7%) or
351
sales and office (23.7%) jobs, while only a few participants (7.9%) worked in natural
352
resources, construction, or maintenance.
353
Discussion
354
Veterans with SCI participating in a continuous 2-year program of IPS as part of their
355
SCI care achieved a competitive employment rate of 43.2%. The participants in this
356
program were a heterogeneous sample that reflected the medical complexity typically
357
seen in this population. Nearly 40% had a motor complete SCI (no movement or
358
sensation below the level of injury) and most of the sample also had a current or lifetime
359
history of co-occurring medical issues, mental illness, and/or brain injury. Services were
360
provided regardless of treatment setting, severity of disability, or chronic or acute
361
medical conditions experienced over the 2-year study period, such as pressure ulcers,
362
bowel or bladder problems, depression, or pain. Among those who were enrolled as
363
outpatients and had SCI with no reported history of TBI, the employment rate was even
364
higher, at 52.2%. Thus, a 24-month IPS program integrated into SCI care and following a
365
zero-exclusion principle, improved employment outcomes among veterans with
366
significant physical disability, high medical complexity, and co-occurring mental or
367
cognitive impairments.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
347
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
18
Although a higher employment rate was observed in a 24-month IPS program than the
369
rate obtained in the previous RCT of a 12-month IPS program in SCI, there are some key
370
differences between the two studies designs that make comparing the results challenging.
371
Given the well-known high rate of co-occurrence of SCI and TBI, we suspect that both
372
studies were clinically similar populations in terms of presence and severity of TBI.
373
However, the earlier study did not include a measure of TBI, whereas a strength of the
374
current study was the use of the OSU-TBI-ID to identify lifetime history of TBI.
375
Additionally, recruitment methods also differed between the studies. The earlier study
376
primarily recruited an outpatient sample of veterans with SCI. In the present study,
377
veterans were recruited without respect to inpatient or outpatient setting. While some
378
participants in both studies may have experienced hospitalization during IPS, a quarter of
379
the participants in the current study started IPS as inpatients, which would have put them
380
at a major disadvantage for rapidly engaging in job searches in the community. Indeed,
381
the current sample included a number of patients who had lengthy hospital stays during
382
the intervention period and may have been too medically compromised to fully
383
participate. In this respect, the 43.2% employment rate for our entire sample may be an
384
underestimate of results that could occur in outpatient SCI programs, particularly if they
385
screened for TBI. Therefore, the sample population and setting needs to be carefully
386
considered with respect to the study findings and generalizability.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
387
RI PT
368
388
While the present study was not designed as a randomized comparison, its findings have
389
important implications. Although time of first job acquisition usually occurred early in
390
the program (months 4-6), new jobs were steadily acquired throughout the 24 months.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
19
This continuity of job acquisition highlights the need for ongoing rather than time-limited
392
services, and the importance of the full range of IPS services to support both job
393
acquisition and maintenance. At the time of enrollment, most participants expressed a
394
preference for part time work, and the outcome of most participants obtaining part time
395
work is consistent with the IPS consumer-driven approach. Rapid engagement, another
396
IPS practice principle, did not necessarily result in quickly obtaining employment, as
397
seen by the wide variability in time to employment in our sample. However, participants
398
were rapidly and directly engaged in active job seeking and job development with their
399
VRS and treatment team. This support eventually resulted in many becoming employed
400
in the community in their chosen field without the need for lengthy pre-vocational
401
assessments or activities such as work readiness or work hardening. Including follow-
402
along support as part of an ongoing IPS program enabled the VRS to work with the
403
individual, the employer, and the treatment team to make adjustments to support job
404
tenure such as adding or modifying work accommodations to improve performance,
405
changing bladder or bowel management routines to match work schedules, or adjusting
406
pain or spasticity medication management to avoid sedation on the job. Sometimes
407
during a period of follow-along support, the VRS may become aware that the individual
408
needs or desires a different position and initiate another phase of job development to find
409
work in a new setting. In the IPS model, follow along services allow VRSs to support job
410
transitions-- either in the case of advancing to a better paying or better fitting job based
411
on the participants’ preferences and career plans. The successful outcomes of IPS in the
412
present investigation are consistent with other studies showing active community-based
413
services such as job development, job placement, and follow-up support are associated
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
391
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
20
with employment of persons with SCI.28,29 When providing these services, the knowledge
415
and expertise of the SCI clinical team is leveraged by the VRS while in the community
416
networking with employers and negotiating job placements based on the interests and
417
preferences of the individual with SCI. In previous work using IPS in SCI, time spent
418
providing these services in the community was more likely to result in competitive
419
employment outcomes than was traditional vocational counseling in office or clinic
420
settings.29
SC
RI PT
414
M AN U
421
Chronic unemployment may be associated with depression, low self-confidence, and
423
social disenfranchisement which present significant barriers to future employment.
424
Employment barriers are best addressed with a system that offers IPS services integrated
425
with medical care and that lasts throughout the working life of those who have been
426
unable to obtain and maintain work due to disability. According to existing data, a
427
minority of persons with SCI, about 35%,9,30 return to work. Even among veterans with
428
SCI who wanted employment, but received referrals to traditional VR, the average
429
employment rates in the SCI-VIP trial were remarkably low, ranging from 4.8% to
430
11.8%. In general, studies show that individuals with higher levels of education and those
431
who were employed before or at the time of injury are more likely to be employed.9,31 In
432
the current study sample, nearly half of the participants were employed prior to SCI,
433
only16.4% returned to work after SCI, and none were currently employed. Clearly, the
434
majority of persons with SCI most likely would benefit from more intensive and
435
coordinated supports to resume and sustain employment after injury. Although post-
436
injury education is a modifiable variable that could increase employment opportunities
AC C
EP
TE D
422
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
21
post-SCI,32 many persons with SCI are not inclined to go back to school and prefer
438
hands-on or action-oriented occupations.33,34 The rapid job search and job development
439
features of IPS are essential evidence-based vocational services for these persons, who
440
need help finding careers that align with their interests, goals, and current capabilities.
441
Unlike traditional VR models, which may require pre-vocational testing, training, or skill
442
building, the IPS model works with persons at their current level of functioning.
443
Moreover, based on a “recovery” model, IPS uses work as therapy--as a means to address
444
psychiatric and/or medical problems such as substance abuse, pain management, or
445
mobility as employment barriers--which motivates the patient to address the problems.
446
Instead of secondary conditions excluding or delaying vocational plans, the integration of
447
IPS with other rehabilitation interventions enables vocational goals to become part of a
448
holistic treatment plan to maximize health and independence. Continued follow-up
449
support by rehabilitation professionals is important, as recent evidence suggests that, as
450
persons adjust to SCI, their vocational interests may evolve and occupations that were not
451
considered initially may become viable options.35 In traditional VR models, referrals are
452
often made at the conclusion of rehabilitation to outside providers or agencies. This
453
approach may not support adapting vocational plans over time. Integrating IPS with
454
medical rehabilitation provides an opportunity to revisit vocational goals and make
455
adjustments as needed as individual age and/or as experience changes in their health or
456
lifestyle.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
437
457 458
The employment rate with 24 months of IPS in SCI approaches rates reported in a
459
number of RCTs of persons with serious mental illness treated in outpatient settings.23
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
22
The mental health field has moved forward in establishing benchmarks for IPS success.
461
Using quarterly data from over 127 IPS mental health programs, standards have been set
462
for minimal (33%), moderate (45%) and high (57%) rates of employment success.36
463
While additional work on the adoption of IPS in standard SCI care is needed, the 24-
464
month results presented here may serve as a reference point for achievable employment
465
goals for IPS integrated into SCI care. In this study the subset of persons with SCI and no
466
TBI history who started IPS as outpatients achieved an employment rate over 50%, a rate
467
between the moderate to highly successful benchmarks of IPS success applied in
468
outpatient mental health settings. As a medically complex population, persons with SCI
469
likely face barriers not seen in the mental health population, such as neurogenic bowel
470
and bladder resulting in incontinence, risk for pressure ulcers, and neuropathic pain.
471
Developing disability-specific benchmarks or standards for vocational and therapeutic
472
care may be helpful to provide an appropriate treatment target for addressing vocational
473
goals as part of rehabilitation. Presently, there are no guidelines for how these issues
474
should be addressed following SCI, or expected outcomes of services for either the
475
rehabilitation program providers or consumers.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
476
RI PT
460
From a rehabilitation perspective, employment should be addressed early in SCI
478
rehabilitation while there is still a close connection between the patient and the
479
interdisciplinary treatment team.37 On the other hand, referrals for IPS programs are
480
likely to be most beneficial at the time a person is able and willing to look for a job. From
481
a policy perspective, IPS is a resource-intensive service; hence, careful decisions need to
482
be made about who and when to refer to such a program. This study was conducted
AC C
477
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
23
within the VHA, which is both federally funded and the largest integrated system of care
484
for SCI. In this setting, each VRS was a full-time employee of the local VAMC and
485
functioned as a member of the interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. For medically
486
complex rehabilitation populations such as SCI, comprising clients who are likely to
487
experience periodic health setbacks, the integrated team approach has clear advantages.
488
Most importantly, rapid access to the other team members can help address issues
489
quickly. State vocational rehabilitation programs, on the other hand, use a largely non-
490
integrated or partially integrated approach; VR providers may attend team meetings but
491
be employees of the state or private/for-profit VR providers. In other cases, they are
492
employed apart from medical centers. In the TBI literature, examples do exist in the
493
private sector of fee-for-service staff vendorized and embedded into academic medical
494
centers or clinic- based rehabilitation settings.38,39 While a cost-effectiveness analysis of
495
this 24-month IPS program is beyond the scope of this paper, the cost-effectiveness
496
analysis of the 12-month program demonstrated that the per patient cost to provide IPS
497
services in VA SCI centers has been low, at $1821 per patient.40 In the private sector,
498
higher program costs have been reported for persons with serious mental illness 41,42 or
499
traumatic brain injury.39 Depending on the setting and organizational context, IPS
500
program outcomes and costs are likely to vary and reimbursement sources and strategies
501
would be of importance. A pragmatic approach would be for inpatient rehabilitation
502
programs to treat employment as a viable goal and provide an orientation to IPS but
503
reserve initiation of full IPS program services until the time of hospital discharge when
504
persons can fully participate in community job development.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
483
505
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
506
24
Study limitations
507 Generalizability of this study may be limited due to the study population (veterans) and
509
setting (VA clinics) as well as self-reporting of data. The majority of participants were
510
male veterans, which may not reflect the general SCI population regarding potential for
511
employment. Our study population was recruited within proximity to large urban centers
512
for which transportation and employment opportunities may be easier than for persons
513
with SCI in more rural areas. The study did not directly measure level of veteran
514
participation in the IPS program; hence, the study cannot speak to the effects of treatment
515
adherence on outcomes. Care needs to be exercised in generalizing findings to other
516
populations, particularly in respect to treatment setting and inpatient versus outpatient
517
programs. Recognizing the heterogeneity of our entire sample, we reported findings for a
518
more homogeneous subgroup of persons without TBI who enrolled and began IPS as
519
outpatients as an example of outcomes that could be achieved with respect to presence of
520
one of the most common SCI comorbidities and the treatment setting at the start of IPS.
521
Although those participants who enrolled as outpatients were considered healthier at the
522
time of enrollment, members of this subgroup may have experienced a health change and
523
subsequent hospitalization during their study participation. Small sample size preludes
524
an analysis comparing those participants who remained exclusively inpatients vs
525
outpatients for the duration of the 24 month study. Additionally, by excluding those
526
with any reported history of TBI, this group excluded persons with mild TBI who likely
527
would have minimal or no residual cognitive impairment. This report should not be taken
528
to imply that SCI populations should be screened for TBI to determine eligibility, rather,
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
508
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
25
the findings are reported to simply illustrate how additional comorbidities and timing of
530
treatment may impact the expected clinical outcomes. Furthermore, an analysis of other
531
variables (e.g., program fidelity and disability subsidies) that could have impacted
532
outcomes was beyond the scope of this report. Finally, these results are presented as a
533
descriptive report of employment outcomes during the 2 years that participants were
534
followed for data collection during the study funding period. Hence, the job tenure
535
observed in this time-limited study design does not provide an indication of the job
536
sustainability that may be seen in clinical practice where IPS is typically delivered as a
537
time-unlimited service based on each client’s needs.
538
Future directions
M AN U
SC
RI PT
529
539
Future research is needed to increase our understanding of how to efficiently and
541
effectively deliver employment interventions as part of medical rehabilitation for persons
542
with SCI in both the VHA and private sector. In particular, research designs with
543
adequate sample size are needed to examine the multiple factors that impact outcomes
544
including treatment setting, timing of intervention, and medical factors, as well as
545
program participation and fidelity. These types of studies would be helpful to establish
546
expected outcomes for IPS in SCI with respect to medical complexities seen in different
547
treatment settings. Furthermore, information is necessary to appreciate the impact of
548
including IPS in SCI on non-vocational outcomes and on health care utilization and to
549
identify effective strategies to integrate evidence-based supported employment services
550
into the SCI continuum of care.
AC C
EP
TE D
540
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
26
551 552 Conclusions
RI PT
553 554
A longitudinal examination of the use of IPS in SCI rehabilitation with a 24-month
556
implementation period showed positive employment outcomes among a sample veterans
557
receiving inpatient and/or outpatient care. For participants with no TBI history who
558
began IPS as outpatients, the employment rate was over 50%. Time to first employment
559
was highly variable. These findings support providing IPS services as part of SCI care to
560
improve employment outcomes and emphasize the need to provide continued services for
561
longer periods of time. The implementation of IPS in SCI and its expected outcomes need
562
to be considered with respect to the population served and the treatment setting.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
555
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
563
References
564
1.
566
Guttmann L. Statistical Survey on One Thousand Paraplegics. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1954;47:1099–103.
2.
RI PT
565
27
Kennedy P, Hasson L. Return-to-work intentions during spinal cord injury
rehabilitation: an audit of employment outcomes. Spinal Cord [Internet]. 2015 [cited
568
2015 Aug 31];Available from:
569
http://www.nature.com/sc/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/sc2015122a.html#bib27 3.
World Health Organization. International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury
M AN U
570
SC
567
571
[Internet]. New York, NY: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from:
572
http://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?codlan=1&codcol=15&codcch=8
573
60
574
4.
Meade M, Reed K, Saunders L, Krause J. It’s All of the Above: Benefits of Working for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil.
576
2015;21:1–9.
577
5.
TE D
575
Krause JS. Adjustment to life after spinal cord injury: A comparison among three participant groups based on employment status. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 1992;35:218–
579
29. 6.
581 582 583
Leduc BE, Lepage Y. Health-related quality of life after spinal cord injury. Disabil.
AC C
580
EP
578
Rehabil. 2002;24:196–202.
7.
Krause JS, Clark JMR, Saunders LL. SCI Longitudinal Aging Study: 40 Years of Research. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 2015;21:189–200.
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
584
8.
28
Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord.
586
2006;44:95–105.
587
9.
RI PT
585
Ottomanelli L, Lind L. Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal
588
cord injury: Implications for research and vocational services. J. Spinal Cord Med.
589
2009;32:503–31.
10. Krause JS, Terza JV, Erten M, Focht KL, Dismuke CE. Prediction of postinjury
591
employment and percentage of time worked after spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys.
592
Med. Rehabil. 2012;93:373–5.
594 595
M AN U
593
SC
590
11. Krause JS, Terza JV, Dismuke CE. Factors associated with labor force participation after spinal cord injury. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 2010;33:89–99.
12. Ferdiana A, Post MWM, de Groot S, Bültmann U, van der Klink JJL. Predictors of return to work 5 years after discharge for wheelchair-dependent individuals with
597
spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 2014;46:984–90.
598
TE D
596
13. Franceschini M, Pagliacci MC, Russo T, Felzani G, Aito S, Marini C. Occurrence and predictors of employment after traumatic spinal cord injury: the GISEM Study.
600
Spinal Cord [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2012 Jan 12];Available from:
601
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22124342
603 604
AC C
602
EP
599
14. Trenaman LM, Miller WC, Escorpizo R. Interventions for improving employment outcomes among individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Spinal
Cord. 2014;52:788–94.
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
605
29
15. Roels EH, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D, Peers K. Hospital- and community-based interventions enhancing (re)employment for people with spinal cord injury: a
607
systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:2–7.
608
RI PT
606
16. Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL, Suris A, McGeough C, Sinnott PL, Toscano R, et al. Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injuries:
610
results from a randomized multisite study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012;93:740–
611
7.
17. Bond GR, Becker DR, Drake RE, Rapp CA, Meisler N, Lehman AF, et al.
M AN U
612
SC
609
613
Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice. Psychiatr.
614
Serv. Wash. DC. 2001;52:313–22.
616 617
18. Bond GR. Supported employment: Evidence for an evidence-based practice. Psychiatr. Rehabil. J. 2004;27:345–59.
19. Marshall T, Goldberg RW, Braude L, Dougherty RH, Daniels AS, Ghose SS, et al.
TE D
615
618
Supported employment: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr. Serv. Wash. DC.
619
2014;65:16–23.
20. Ottomanelli L, Goetz L, McGeough C, Suris A, Sippel J, Sinnott P, et al. Methods
EP
620
of a multisite randomized clinical trial of supported employment among veterans
622
with spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2009;46:919–30.
623 624
AC C
621
21. Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Goetz LL. A prospective examination of the impact of a supported employment program and employment on health-related quality of life,
625
handicap, and disability among Veterans with SCI. Qual. Life Res. Int. J. Qual. Life
626
Asp. Treat. Care Rehabil. 2013;22:2133–41.
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
627
30
22. Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Goetz LL. Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injury: 2-year results. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
629
2014;95:784–90.
RI PT
628
630
23. Drake RE, Bond GR, Becker DR. Individual placement and support : an evidence-
631
based approach to supported employment. Oxford; New York: Oxford University
632
Press; 2012.
635 636 637
SC
634
24. Becker D, Drake RE. Supported employment interventions are effective for people with severe mental illness. Evid. Based Ment. Health. 2006;9:22.
M AN U
633
25. Corrigan JD, Bogner J. Initial reliability and validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22:318–29. 26. Bond GR, Becker DR, Drake RE, Vogler KM. A fidelity scale for the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Rehabil. Couns. Bull.
639
1997;40:265–84.
640
TE D
638
27. Bond G, Vogler K, Resnick S, Evans L, Drake R, Becker D. Dimensions of supported employment: factor structure of the IPS fidelity scale. J Ment Health.
642
2001;10:383–93.
644 645
28. Marini I, Lee GK, Chan F, Chapin MH, Romero MG. Vocational rehabilitation service patterns related to successful competitive employment outcomes of persons
AC C
643
EP
641
with spinal cord injury. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 2008;28:1–13.
646
29. Ottomanelli L, Barnett S, Goetz L, Toscano R. Vocational Rehabilitation in Spinal
647
Cord Injury: What Vocational Service Activities Are Associated with Employment
648
Program Outcome? Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 2015;21:31–9.
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
649
31
30. Krause J, Kewman D, DeVivo M, Maynard F, Coker J, Roach M, et al. Employment after spinal cord injury: an analysis of cases from the Model Spinal
651
Cord Injury Systems. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1999;80:1492–500.
652
RI PT
650
31. Anderson D, Dummont S, Azzaria L, Bourdais ML, Noreau L. Determinants of
653
return to work among spinal cord injury patients: A literature review. J. Vocat.
654
Rehabil. 2007;27:57–68.
32. Trenaman L, Miller WC, Querée M, Escorpizo R. Modifiable and non-modifiable
656
factors associated with employment outcomes following spinal cord injury: A
657
systematic review. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:422–31.
M AN U
658
SC
655
33. Krause JS, Saunders LL, Staten D, Rohe DE. Vocational interests after recent spinal
659
cord injury: Comparisons related to sex and race. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
660
2011;92:626–31.
664 665 666
TE D
663
cord injury. Rehabil. Psychol. 1999;44:160–75. 35. Krause JS, Clark JMR. Stability of vocational interests after recent spinal cord injury. Rehabil. Psychol. 2014;59:321–8.
EP
662
34. Rohe D, Krause J. Vocational interests of middle-aged men with traumatic spinal
36. Becker DR, Drake RE, Bond GR. Benchmark Outcomes in Supported Employment. Am. J. Psychiatr. Rehabil. 2011;14:230–6.
AC C
661
667
37. Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL. Issues and interventions for work force participation after
668
spinal cord injury [Internet]. In: Handbook of return to work: from research to
669
practice. New York, NY: Springer; 2016. Available from:
670
http://www.springer.com/us/book/9781489976260
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
671
32
38. Wehman P, Kregel J, Keyser-Marcus L, Sherron-Targett P, Campbell L, West M, et al. Supported employment for persons with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary
673
investigation of long-term follow-up costs and program efficiency. Arch. Phys.
674
Med. Rehabil. 2003;84:192–6.
675
RI PT
672
39. West M, Wehman P, Kregel J, Kreutzer J, Sherron P, Zasler N. Costs of operating a supported work program for traumatically brain-injured individuals. Arch. Phys.
677
Med. Rehabil. 1991;72:127–31.
40. Sinnott PL, Joyce V, Su P, Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL, Wagner TH. Cost
M AN U
678
SC
676
679
effectiveness of supported employment for Veterans with spinal cord injuries. Arch.
680
Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014;95:1254–1261.
681
41. Bond GR, McHugo GJ, Becker DR, Rapp CA, Whitley R. Fidelity of supported employment: lessons learned from the National Evidence-Based Practice Project.
683
Psychiatr. Rehabil. J. 2008;31:300–5.
684
TE D
682
42. Latimer EA, Bush PW, Becker DR, Drake RE, Bond GR. The cost of high-fidelity supported employment programs for people with severe mental illness. Psychiatr.
686
Serv. Wash. DC. 2004;55:401–6.
688
AC C
687
EP
685
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI
689
33
Figure Legends
690
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Figure 1. Study Participation Flow Diagram.
AC C
691
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT IPS in SCI
Table 1. Application of IPS Principles to SCI IPS Principle
Application in SCI Center
Integrated treatment
RI PT
Vocational services are integrated with ongoing clinical care and management of SCI in the inpatient unit and outpatient clinics in the SCI Center.
Eligibility is based on the Veteran’s desire for work, not on severity of disability (e.g., all levels of SCI and neurological impairment are eligible for IPS).
SC
Zero exclusion
Veteran is engaged in active job search and job development activities in the community with the VRS, rather than pre-vocational
M AN U
Rapid engagement
assessment or work readiness activities. Competitive
The goal of the IPS program is competitive employment in the
employment
community rather than set-aside jobs for person with disabilities. Veteran preferences for work guide the job search, rather than
TE D
availability of existing jobs. When existing jobs do not meet the
Client centered
Veteran’s preferences, job carving and job development is used to help the Veteran find the work they want. Services are delivered in the community rather than office or hospital settings. The VRS staff is expected to spend up to 70% of
EP
Community-based
their time out in the community working to assist with job finding
AC C
and follow along support. Personalized benefits counseling is sought to help Veteran determine
Benefits counseling
the impact of future work on finances, and understand incentives and disincentives.* Follow-along support is provided by the VRS along with the SCI
Follow-along support
interdisciplinary team for as long as necessary to support job maintenance.
1 2
*VA benefits are protected while Veterans are participating in IPS SE through VA CWT.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI Table 2. Demographic Characteristics at Baseline Total
51.0 ± 10.1
Education, yr
13.9 ± 2.0
Male
206 (96.7)
Employed in ≤5 yr
45 (21.1)
Employed Pre-SCI
102 (47.9)
Employed Post-SCI
35 (16.4)
M AN U
SC
Age, yr
Race Caucasian
118 (55.4)
African American
83 (39.0) 4 (2.0)
Native American Other/Unknown
AC C
Divorced
EP
Marital Status
TE D
Asian
Married
RI PT
(N=213)
Other
1 (0.5) 7 (3.3)
70 (32.9) 72 (33.8) 71 (33.4)
Inpatient at Enrollment
52 (24.4)
VA Benefits
102 (47.9)
SC Benefits for SCI
48 (22.5)
If yes, SC 100%
44 (20.7)
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2 / IPS in SCI Table 2. Demographic Characteristics at Baseline Total
Non-SC Pension
20 (9.4)
Monthly Non-SC
$946 ± 640
SSI Amount, avg
$837 ± 463 $1,242 ± 460
SC
SSDI Amount, avg
RI PT
(N=213)
NOTE: Values expressed are mean ± SD or n (%). SCI, spinal cord
2
injury; SC, service connected; SSI, Social Security Income; SSDI,
3
Social Security Disability Income. ‘Employed ≤ 5 years’ refers to
4
any employment post-SCI but within 5 years of entry into the
5
study. ‘Employed Post-SCI’ refers to any employment post-SCI
6
but before entry into the study. Benefit amounts are in US dollars.
TE D EP AC C
7
M AN U
1
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R1 / IPS in SCI
Table 3. Medical Characteristics of Participants of PrOMOTE (n=213)
Cause of Injury 62 (29.1)
Fall
43 (20.2)
Violence
18 (8.5)
Other/Unknown
90 (42.3)
SC
Vehicular accident
10.9 ± 11.1
M AN U
Avg. Time Since Injury, yr FIM Total
77.1 ± 25.7
ASIA Impairment Scale A
59 (27.7)
B
26 (12.2)
31 (14.6)
E
EP
AIS & Neurologic Level
TE D
C D
RI PT
Total (N=213)
93 (43.7) 2 (1.0)
21 (9.9)
Low Tetraplegia, AIS A,B,C
37 (17.4)
AC C
High Tetraplegia, AIS A,B,C
Paraplegia, AIS A,B,C
58 (27.2)
AIS D/E
95 (44.6)
History of TBI on OSU-TBIID
126 (59.2)
Medical Comorbidities Neurogenic bladder
164 (77.0)
Neurogenic bowel
154 (72.3)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R1 / IPS in SCI
Table 3. Medical Characteristics of Participants of PrOMOTE (n=213)
173 (81.2)
Spasticity/Spasm of muscle
90 (42.3)
Hypertension
75 (35.2)
Pain
62(29.1)
Pressure ulcer
44 (20.7)
Arthritis
40 (18.8)
M AN U
SC
Other medical
RI PT
Total (N=213)
Urinary tract infection
36 (16.9)
Diabetes mellitus
31 (14.6)
Anemia
23 (10.8)
Autonomic dysreflexia
23 (10.8)
22 (10.3)
TE D
Hepatitis Mental Health Comorbidities Dementia
Depression
EP
Schizophrenia
AC C
Bipolar disorder
Substance abuse
0 (0.0) 4 (1.9) 75 (35.2) 6 (2.8) 41 (19.2)
1
NOTE. Values expressed are mean ± SD or n (%). PrOMOTE, The Predictive Outcome Model Over Time
2
for Employment; FIM, functional independence measure; FIM, functional independence measure; ASIA,
3
American Spinal Injury Association; AIS, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale; TBI,
4
traumatic brain injury; OSU-TBI ID, Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method;
5
Pain (Low back pain, Central pain, Neuralgia, Shoulder pain); Arthritis (Spinal Canal Stenosis, Cervical
6
Spondylosis, Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD), Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R1 / IPS in SCI
Table 4. Employment Characteristics of Participants of PrOMOTE Obtaining Competitive Employment Total (n=92) 115
RI PT
Total number of obtained jobs Unique subjects obtaining a job, n (%)
92 (43.2)
Employment rate (95% CI)
43.2 (36.9-50.2)
Length of employment, weeks
38.2 ± 29.7
264.8 ± 348.2
SC
Wages per week, dollars Hours worked per week
15.2 ± 13.1
M AN U
Days worked per week SOC Classifications
2.6 ± 1.7
Management, Business, Science, & Arts
42 (36.6)
Sales and Office
31 (27.2)
Service
TE D
Production, Transportation, & Material Moving
Natural Resources, Construction, & Maintenance Hours missed per week Total number jobs left
18 (15.6) 16 (14.0) 7 (6.1) 1.1 ± 2.4 51 (44.3)
Quit
EP
Reason for job ending
17 (33.3) 6 (11.8)
Laid off
4 (7.8)
Fired
3 (5.9)
New job
2 (3.9)
AC C
Seasonal/contract completed
Other / Unknown Note. CI, confidence interval; SOC, Standard Occupational Classification
19 (37.3)
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2
Page 1
IPS SE Services – Brief Definitions
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
● CWT Intake/Orientation—This process satisfies the requirement that any Veteran enrolled in IPS SE be enrolled in CWT and allows for monitoring by the Northeast Program Evaluation Center (NEPEC). ● Assertive Engagement & Outreach—These efforts convey the IPS SE model value that no one will be dropped from services due to missed appointments, unreturned calls, ambivalence, passive service refusal, or doubts about ability to work. ● Ongoing Vocational Assessment—The IPS model emphasizes the value of gathering assessment information even while a Veteran is working in a competitive job to ensure continuous updating of the Vocational Assessment Profile and vocational treatment plan. ● Focused Interview Assessment and Initial Vocational Assessment Profile (VAP)—This process is a critical part of ongoing vocational assessment, which allows the VRS to develop comprehensive knowledge about the Veteran via hands-on information gathering during several face-to-face meetings that focus on strengths, abilities, preferences for employment, and existing community contacts. ● Assistance in Obtaining Benefits Counseling—This SE principle ensures that Veterans enrolled in IPS SE receive accurate, comprehensive benefits counseling according to the type(s) of benefits they receive, which will help to address typical fears and concerns about the effects of returning to work on benefits eligibility. ● Treatment Plan Development—Following development of the VAP, the Veteran, the VRS, and the IDT develop a vocational treatment plan that addresses work goals, preferences, and supports and that outlines steps for goal attainment. ● Referral for Collateral Services—This is a treatment option when a needed resource has been identified but is not available within the VA and there is funding to offset costs. ● Network Contact—This is a contact made with or on behalf of a Veteran in the course of the job search with the objective of getting one step closer to a potential employer. ● Business and Industry Research—This research is conducted by the VRS in preparation for an employer contact and with the intention of gathering information that will help determine whether there is potential for a good job match. ● Job Development: Employer Contact—This occurs over several face-to-face meetings with a potential employer and has the ultimate objective of gathering enough information to determine whether a competitive job match might be made for a specific Veteran. ● Job Development: Employer Negotiations—These negotiations are held with a specific employer focused on hiring a specific Veteran and may be of the following types: Job proposal presentations, discussion of how the Veteran’s strengths fit the employer’s needs, job carving/creation, Veteran interviews, and schedule and shift determination. ● Vocational Rehabilitation Counseling—This process helps Veterans achieve their objectives through problem identification and resolution, examination of attitudes and feelings, consideration of alternative solutions, and decision-making. ● Worksite Accommodation—This is an individualized adjustment or alteration to a worksite or the way a job is performed to accommodate restrictions imposed by an injury or disability. Worksite accommodations must be negotiated with employers and are determined by a thorough job analysis. ● Vocational Case Management—Case management services provided by the VRS are those that are specifically related to the Veteran’s being equipped to participate in searching for, obtaining, and maintaining a competitive job. ● Employment Follow-Up/Follow-Along Supports—Based on an IPS principle, these are individualized, creative, and flexible supports intended to assist a Veteran in maintaining employment and are provided with any time limit. ● Treatment Plan Review/Revision—Review of each Veteran’s vocational treatment plan should occur at least monthly to allow for updates based on new profile information. Revision should occur at least every 3 months in concert with feedback from the IDT. ● Assistance with Job Transition—In the event that a Veteran’s job is no longer a good match, the VRS provides assistance in making the transition from one job to another, in framing the end of a job as a learning experience that will inform a new job search.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AMPR D-16-00556R2
Page 2
RI PT
● Consultation with CWT Staff-- Each VRS will attend weekly CWT/SE meetings and thereby participate as part of the vocational unit at the site as well as interact individually with colleagues and CWT Program Manager for additional assistance. ● Consultation with SCI IDT Member-Based on an IPS principle, the VRS will foster and facilitate integration of clinical and employment services by communicating regularly with SCI IDT members about Veterans with SCI who want to return to work or who are employed. ● Attending SCI IDT Meetings—In keeping with the IPS principle of treatment integration, the VRS attends weekly SCI IDT meetings to champion employment services as part of each Veteran’s treatment and to participate in shared decision-making with clinical colleagues.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
This material is excerpted here from Ottomanelli L, Keleher V, Dirk L. IPS supported employment in SCI: implementation guide from the Predictive Model Over Time to Employment (PrOMOTE) Project. Appendix 5.1. 2016 October. Available at www.cindrr.research.va.gov/CINDRRRESEARCH/investigators_staff/lisa_ottomanelli.asp