Journal Pre-proof Influence of electrostatic interactions on the formation and stability of multilayer fish oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by whey protein-xanthan-locust bean complexes Kristen Griffin, Hanna Khouryieh PII:
S0260-8774(19)30536-9
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109893
Reference:
JFOE 109893
To appear in:
Journal of Food Engineering
Received Date: 21 September 2019 Revised Date:
18 December 2019
Accepted Date: 21 December 2019
Please cite this article as: Griffin, K., Khouryieh, H., Influence of electrostatic interactions on the formation and stability of multilayer fish oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by whey proteinxanthan-locust bean complexes, Journal of Food Engineering (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfoodeng.2019.109893. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1
Influence of Electrostatic Interactions on the Formation and Stability of Multilayer Fish
2
Oil-in-water Emulsions Stabilized by Whey Protein-Xanthan-Locust Bean Complexes
3 4
Kristen Griffina, Hanna Khouryiehb*
5
a
Department of Chemistry, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA
6
b
School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY,
7
USA
8
*
Corresponding author: Tel.: +1 (270) 745 4126; email:
[email protected]
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1
25 26
ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of electrostatic interactions on
27
the stability of multilayered fish oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions stabilized by whey protein isolate
28
(WPI)-xanthan (XG)-locust bean gum (LBG) complexes. Emulsions were prepared using the
29
layer-by-layer deposition technique with salt concentrations (0, 5, and 50 mM NaCl) at pH below
30
(pH 3) and above (pH 7) the isoelectric point of WPI. Results indicated that zeta potential at pH
31
3 resulted in positive values, whereas at pH 7 resulted in negative values, with the magnitude of
32
the ζ-potentials increasing as the NaCl concentration increased. NaCl did not have any major
33
impact on the particle size of the emulsions. XG emulsions had the highest viscosity at pH 3
34
regardless of time, though XG-LBG emulsions showed a significant increase at 0 and 5 mM
35
NaCl over time. XG emulsions at pH 3 showed the highest viscosity at every salt concentration.
36
At pH 7, XG-LBG emulsions had the highest viscosity results, yet decreased over time,
37
indicating the negative salt effect the synergistic interaction between XG and LBG. With 0 mM
38
and 5 mM NaCl at pH 7, XG-LBG emulsions had the highest creaming stability; while with 50
39
mM NaCl, XG emulsions had the highest creaming stability. For both the primary and secondary
40
lipid oxidation tests, XG-LBG emulsions had the highest oxidative stability at every salt
41
concentration at pH 7. These results have important implications in the design of biopolymer-
42
based delivery systems for microencapsulating omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for use in
43
functional foods.
44 45 46 47 48 49 50
2
51 52
1. Introduction Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are found in several plant and animal oils
53
(e.g., fish oil), and are crucial in human growth and development throughout the life cycle as an
54
important component of essentially all cell membranes (Ellulu, Khaza’ai, Abed, Rahmat, Ismail,
55
& Ranneh, 2015; Simopoulos, 1991). As these fatty acids are not synthesized by the body, it is
56
imperative that they are obtained through diet; however, it is difficult to include fish oils into
57
food as they are highly susceptible to oxidation. Oxidation causes loss of fat-soluble vitamins,
58
generation of off-flavors, palatability problems, and even production of toxins that cause
59
foodborne illness (Arab-Tehrany et al., 2012; Shantha & Decker, 1994). Emulsions are
60
commonly used in the food and beverage industry as delivery systems to protect and control the
61
release of bioactive components (McClements, Decker, & Weiss, 2007). However, emulsions are
62
thermodynamically unstable systems that break down over time through flocculation and
63
coalescence, leading to creaming during storage. Successful development of delivery systems
64
with omega-3 fatty acids depends on the properties of emulsion (e.g., droplet size, viscosity), the
65
effect of environmental stresses (e.g., salt, pH), and the interaction between oil droplets and
66
surface-active components.
67
The kinetic stability of emulsions can be enhanced using stabilizers such as emulsifiers
68
and texture modifiers. Emulsion stability can be enhanced using multilayer adsorption at the
69
interface. The formation of multilayer oil-in-water emulsions, utilizing the electrostatic layer-by-
70
layer (LBL) deposition technique, consists of a multistep procedure where an oil and aqueous
71
phase are first homogenized in the presence of a charged emulsifier (e.g., protein), after which
72
consecutive layers of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes (e.g., polysaccharides) are added so
73
that it adsorbs to the protein-coated oil droplets (Guzey & McClements, 2007). Many studies
3
74
reported that multilayer emulsions provide better stability than conventional emulsions against
75
environmental stresses such as pH, ionic strength, heating, and freezing (Guzey & McClements,
76
2006; Aoki, Decker, McClements, 2005; Ogawa, Decker, & McClements, 2004).
77
Mixtures of different proteins and polysaccharides are usually used to fabricate
78
biopolymer-based delivery systems. In the current study, stabilized multilayer emulsions were
79
created as delivery systems for the fish oil. Whey protein isolate (WPI) is a surface-active protein
80
product containing mainly α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin. These proteins contain functional
81
groups that allow WPI-stabilized emulsions to act as an antioxidant system by scavenging free
82
radicals, thereby inhibiting lipid oxidation (Berton-Carabin, Ropers, & Genot, 2014; Sun,
83
Gunasekaran, & Richards, 2007; Elias, McClements, & Decker, 2005; Gordon, 2001). At pH 3,
84
below its isoelectric point (pI) of pH 4.7- 5.2 (Charoen, Jangchud, Jangchud, Harnsilawat,
85
Naivikul, & McClements, 2011; Demetriades, Coupland, & McClements, 1997), WPI has a very
86
net positive charge; while at the isoelectric point, the protein has a net charge of zero and the
87
potential for protein-protein interaction is at its highest point. As the pH is increased up to pH 7,
88
the net charge on the protein will shift to a negative charge. Xanthan gum (XG) is an anionic
89
polysaccharide that displays different pH-dependent interactions with the WPI. At a low pH, XG
90
and WPI form complexes that prevent coalescence of the oil droplets; alternatively, at a high pH
91
the biopolymers repel one another. Locust bean gum (LBG), a non-ionic galactomannan, is not
92
influenced by variations in pH value and salt concentration. It does provide enhanced viscosity to
93
emulsions containing other polysaccharides, such as XG or carrageenan (Barak & Mudgil, 2014;
94
Goycoolea, Morris, & Gidley, 1995). XG and LBG have a synergistic relationship, which has
95
been extensively researched (Owens, Griffin, Khouryieh, & Williams, 2018; Khouryieh, Puli,
96
Williams, & Aramouni, 2015; Bresolin et al., 1997; Tako, Asato, & Nakamura, 1984). A
4
97
synergistic interaction occurs between XG and LBG, which results in substantially enhanced
98
viscosity or gelation. This phenomenon is due to the intermolecular binding that may occur
99
between the sidechains of XG in the helical form and the backbone of the LBG (Khouryieh,
100
Herald, Aramouni, & Alavi, 2007). When added to the emulsion, these two polysaccharides
101
synergism has been shown to increase the adsorption of the WPI to the oil droplet at the O/W
102
interface, and thus, inhibiting coalescence and creaming (Khouryieh et al., 2015).
103
Various studies have investigated the antioxidative effect of salt on O/W emulsions
104
containing different oils, polysaccharides, and transition metal ions (Berton-Carabin et al., 2014;
105
Nielsen, Horn, & Jacobsen, 2013; Laguerre, Lecomte, & Villeneuve, 2007; McClements, 2004;
106
McClements & Decker, 2000). Positively charged salt ions (e.g. sodium or calcium) aid the
107
protein and polysaccharide(s) in repelling positively charged transition metals that may come
108
near the oil droplet interface; thus, the positively charged salt ion benefits the oxidative stability
109
of the emulsion (Nielsen et al., 2013). In this study, multilayered oil-in-water emulsions
110
containing menhaden droplets were fabricated. The main objective of this research was to study
111
the influence of electrostatic interactions on the formation and stability of multilayer oil-in-water
112
emulsions stabilized by WPI-XG-LBG complexes. The impact of adding XG and LBG on the
113
stability of WPI-coated O/W emulsions as function of salt was investigated to determine whether
114
WPI-stabilized emulsions containing XG-LBG mixtures would provide better physical and
115
oxidative stability than emulsions containing either XG or LBG alone. The effect of NaCl salt
116
content (0, 5, and 50 mM) at pH below (pH 3) and above (pH 7) the isoelectric point of WPI was
117
studied.
118 119
5
120 121
2. Materials and Methods
122
2.1. Materials
123
Menhaden oil (14:0 Myristic acid 6-9%, 16:0 Palmitic acid 15-20%, 16:1 palmitoelic acid
124
9-14%, 18:1 oleic acid 5-12%, 18:2 linoleic acid <3, 20:4 arachidonic acid <3%, 18:4
125
octadecatetraenoic acid 2-4%, 20:5 eocosapentanoic acid 10-15% and 22:6 docosahexaenoic acid
126
8-15%, as provided by the manufacturer), xanthan gum, locust bean gum, and sodium azide were
127
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Sodium Chloride was purchased from
128
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), and whey protein isolate was purchased from
129
Davisco Food International, Inc. in the form of BiPro. All other reagents and chemicals used
130
were of analytical grade. Deionized water was used to produce the emulsions.
131 132 133
2.2. Preparation of emulsions Stock solutions of WPI (10% w/v), XG (2%), LBG (2%), and each respective salt
134
solution were prepared fresh for every set of testing, and allowed to stir for up to 10 h on a
135
magnetic stirrer before use. Both XG and LBG solutions were stirred on low heat (~45°C) to
136
ensure complete dispersion and hydration. A sodium azide (0.04%) was added to prevent the
137
growth of bacteria.
138
Oil-in-water primary emulsions were prepared by homogenizing menhaden oil into WPI
139
aqueous solutions for 3 min using a Fisher Scientific PowerGen 500 homogenizer at 30,000 rpm.
140
Then secondary emulsions were created by adding the respective XG, LBG, or XG-LBG
141
solutions to the primary emulsions and homogenizing for another 3 min. The pH of the
142
secondary emulsions was then adjusted by using 1M HCl and 1M NaOH to either pH 3 or pH 7.
6
143
The pH of the emulsions before adjustment was in the range of 6.6 - 6.7. Sodium chloride
144
solution at 0 mM, 5 mM, and 50 mM was then added to the samples of emulsions, and the
145
emulsions were further homogenized for an additional 1 min. The lowering of the pH before the
146
addition of the salt allows electrostatic interaction between the xanthan gum and the whey
147
protein adsorbed oil droplets, and increases the stability of the emulsion as proposed by Guzey &
148
McClements (2007). The final composition of the emulsions was 10% (v/v) menhaden oil, 2%
149
(w/v) WPI, and 0.2% (w/v) of a XG-LBG mixture at a 1:1 ratio, XG, or LBG. Oil-in-water
150
emulsions containing only WPI were served as the study control. The final emulsions were then
151
stored in glass vials in the dark at ambient temperature to prevent oxidation occurring outside the
152
parameters of the experiment.
153 154 155
2.3. Zeta potential measurements The ζ-potential of the emulsions was determined using the Zetasizer Nano Z instrument
156
(Malvern Instruments, Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). Aliquots from the cream layer of the emulsion
157
samples were diluted by a factor of 100 to allow accurate and precise readings of the ζ-potentials.
158
The folded capillary cells in which the samples were measured were rinsed with methanol and
159
deionized water before use. To reduce the accumulation of air bubbles within in the capillary
160
cells, the diluted emulsion samples were injected upside down and tapped to dislodge any air
161
bubbles. Every emulsion type was measured in duplicate, with each duplicate receiving three
162
measurements. All ζ-potential measurements were made at day 1 and after 2 weeks.
163 164
2.4. Particle size measurements
7
165
Malvern Mastersizer hydro 2000MU (Malvern Instruments, Ltd., Worcestershire, UK)
166
was used to determine the oil droplet size. The cream layer of the emulsion samples was added to
167
800mL of deionized water until the obscuration range was within 10-20%. The dilution of the
168
sample occurred to prevent multiple scattering effects. The refractive indices for the oil droplet
169
and the deionized water were set to 1.46 and 1.33, respectively. Every emulsion sample was
170
measured in duplicates with three measurements for each duplicate. The surface weighted mean
171
(D [3,2]) of the oil droplets was gathered to represent the particle size. All particle size
172
measurements were made at day 1 and after 2 weeks.
173 174 175
2.5. Viscosity measurements A Discovery Hybrid Rheometer (Model HR-2, TA Instrument, New Castle, DE, USA)
176
was used for the emulsions rheological measurements. A 40 mm diameter parallel plate
177
geometry with a gap of 1000 µm was used for all measurements. Viscosity measurements were
178
performed at 25 °C with shear rates from 0 to 100 s-1. Trios v3.0 software controlled the
179
rheometer and was used for data collection and analysis. Measurements were performed at day 1
180
and after 2 weeks.
181 182 183
2.6. Creaming stability measurements Emulsion samples were pipetted into 15-mL vials and stored upright in a dark area at
184
room temperature to prevent undue lipid oxidation. The creaming index (CI) was measured using
185
a precise ruler every hour in centimeters for the first 6 h after preparation and then every 24 h for
186
2 weeks. Over time, due to thermodynamic instability, the emulsions separate into a top oil (or
187
cream) layer and a bottom serum layer. It can be defined by the equation:
8
188
CI (%) = Hs/HT x 100%, where Hs represents the serum height and HT represents the overall
189
height of the emulsion. Measuring the creaming index can help determine the amount of
190
aggregation within the emulsion, as an increased level of aggregation leads to larger flocs and
191
faster creaming.
192 193 194
2.7. Microstructural characterization Differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy (Zeiss Axioplan 2 optical imaging)
195
was used to determine the microstructure of the cream layer of the emulsions. Ten microliters of
196
sample were placed on a slide and covered by a 18mm x 18mm coverslip. A droplet of
197
immersion oil was placed on top of the coverslip to allow better resolution due its differing
198
refractive index. The magnification used was 40x and all images were captured using Axiovision
199
2.0 software.
200 201 202
2.8. Lipid oxidation measurements To determine the oxidative stability, fresh emulsions were stored in screw-cap glass vials
203
in the dark at ambient temperature for up to eight weeks. The oxidative stability of the
204
emulsions was determined by measuring the primary (lipid hydroperoxides) and secondary
205
(thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)) lipid oxidation product concentrations.
206
2.8.1 Primary lipid oxidation products
207
Lipid hydroperoxide concentrations were determined by the adapted method of Elias et
208
al. (2005). The lipid hydroperoxides were measured by mixing 100 mg of the emulsion sample
209
with 4.9 mL of 2:1 v/v isooctane/1-butanol in a test tube. Fifty microliters of ferrous iron
210
solution and 20 μL of ammonium thiocyanate were then added to the mixture. The ferrous iron
9
211
solution was prepared by mixing 0.132 M BaCl2 and 0.144 M FeSO4 in equal amounts. The test
212
tubes were then vortexed for 10 s and let rest in the dark for 20 min, after which the absorbances
213
of the samples were measured at 510 nm with a Shimadzu UV-1601 UV-vis spectrophotometer.
214
The standard curve for determining the lipid hydroperoxides was prepared using cumene
215
hydroperoxide.
216
2.8.2 Secondary lipid oxidation products
217
TBARS test was used to determine the secondary lipid oxidation products according an
218
adapted method of Elias et al. (2005). A 10 mg of emulsion samples were placed in test tubes
219
and mixed with 2.0 mL of TBA reagent, which is comprised of 15% w/v trichloroacetic acid,
220
0.375% w/v thiobarbituric acid, and 10.2 M HCl dissolved in 1-butanol. The samples were
221
placed in a boiling water bath for 15 min, cooled to room temperature, and then centrifuged for
222
15 min at 1000 g. After 10 min, the absorbance of the samples was measured at 532 nm with a
223
Shimadzu UV-1601 UV-vis spectrophotometer. The TBARS concentrations were determined by
224
using a standard curve prepared using 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane.
225 226 227
2.9. Statistical analysis The experimental data was analyzed using version 9.3.1 SAS statistical software (SAS
228
Institute Inc., Carry, NC, USA). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure with
229
bonferroni’s post-hoc comparisons tests was used for determining statistical differences between
230
the emulsion samples. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. At least duplicate
231
determinations of each emulsion sample were examined, and the results were reported as the
232
mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the measurements.
233
10
234
3. Results and discussion
235
3.1. Effect of ionic strength and pH on droplet charge
236
Regardless of the NaCl concentrations, all emulsions at pH 3 resulted in positive ζ-
237
potentials, while all emulsions at pH 7 demonstrated negative ζ-potential values (Fig. 1). The
238
positive ζ-potential values indicate the dominance of the WPI at the oil-water interface because
239
the surface charge values mirror the positive net charge of the WPI, resulting from pH 3 being
240
below the pI of the WPI. Similar results were reported by Long, Zhao, Liu, Kuang, Xu & Zhao
241
(2013). The reason for WPI dominating the ζ-potential in emulsions containing the anionic XG at
242
pH 3 could be due to the XG and WPI interacting mostly in the continuous phase rather than at
243
the oil-water interface (Long et al., 2013). The negative ζ-potential values at pH 7 can be
244
expected because all emulsions contain the negatively charged WPI due to the pH being above
245
the pI of the WPI. Sun et al. (2007) found that negatively charged WPI chains can adsorb
246
strongly to the oil droplet surfaces, influencing the overall charge of the droplets. Since all
247
emulsions contain the WPI and an anionic XG or neutrally LBG charged polysaccharide, the net
248
charge of all droplets was negative at pH 7, which agrees with the Sun et al. (2007) study. The
249
large ζ-potential absolute values at pH 7 suggest large amounts of repulsion between both the
250
WPI and the added polysaccharides, and therefore displaying increased stability. XG-containing
251
emulsions displayed the highest absolute values due to both XG and WPI being anionic at
252
neutral pH. At this pH, the XG dominates the surface charge (Grigoriev & Miller, 2009).
253
The small increase in ζ-potential as NaCl is added at pH 7 could be explained by
254
electrostatic screening diminishing any residual repulsions between the negatively charged WPI
255
and XG. The salt ions, both positive [Na+] and negative [Cl-] ones, arrange themselves around
256
the negatively charged WPI and XG particles. The NaCl ions tend to form a cloud of ions around
11
257
the particles, and this results in the net effect of screening or weakening, the net negative charge
258
of the particles. This contributes to the increased adsorption of the XG onto the surface of WPI-
259
coated droplets. The increased adsorption at the interface further stabilizes the oil droplets. A
260
similar occurrence was seen in a study observing interactions between ɩ-carrageenan and β-
261
lactoglobulin (Gu, Decker, & McClements, 2004). The NaCl also contributes to a larger
262
counterion cloud surrounding the individual protein-coated oil droplets; considering all droplets
263
in one emulsion are similarly charged, the counterion clouds will contain the same charge.
264
Therefore, any droplets approaching one another will not interact and cannot alter the surface
265
charge of a neighboring droplet (McClements, 2015).
266
Emulsions containing the XG-LBG mixtures at pH 3 had the lowest ζ-potential values
267
among the rest of polysaccharides. Also, XG-LBG emulsions at pH 3 displayed higher ζ-
268
potential values as the NaCl concentration increased, indicating more repulsion between the
269
polysaccharides and WPI-coated droplets and higher stability with more NaCl present. The WPI
270
in the emulsions remained adsorbed to the oil droplets and dominated the surface charge while
271
the NaCl produced an electrostatic screening for the XG-LBG emulsions to interact with the
272
cationic WPI and thereby stabilize the droplets. XG emulsions after 2 weeks of storage resulted
273
in slightly greater ζ-potential absolute values with greater NaCl concentrations. This is due to the
274
NaCl reducing any remaining electrostatic barriers between XG and WPI-coated droplets at pH
275
3, encouraging the oppositely charged polymers to interact strongly and stabilize the oil droplet.
276
In general, all emulsions at pH 7 had similar ζ-potential values regardless of the NaCl content at
277
both day 1 and 14. This indicates that NaCl did not have much of an impact on the stability of
278
the emulsions at neutral pH.
279
12
280 281
3.2. Effect of ionic strength and pH on droplet aggregation The mean particle sizes of the emulsions with varying NaCl concentrations were
282
measured at pH 3 and pH 7 over 2 weeks of storage (Table 1). With no salt added at pH 3,
283
emulsions containing XG had the largest particle size at 9 µm. Emulsions containing XG-LBG
284
had smaller particle sizes of 5 µm, and LBG and WPI emulsions consistently remained the
285
smallest. Within this trend, XG-LBG emulsions had significantly (p < 0.05) larger particle sizes
286
at 0 mM NaCl than at 5 and 50 mM NaCl on day 1; while LBG emulsions had significantly (p <
287
0.05) larger particle sizes at 50 mM NaCl on day 1 and significantly increased at every salt
288
concentration after 2 weeks. At every salt concentration at pH 7, the particle sizes of every
289
emulsion remained small (d32 ≈ 2- 3 µm). The particle size of emulsions containing XG-LBG
290
complexes at 0 mM NaCl had significantly (p < 0.05) increased after two weeks, and was the
291
largest particle size at pH 7. LBG and WPI emulsions resulted in the smallest particle sizes, but
292
the microstructure (Fig. 2) and creaming index (Fig. 3) of these emulsions illustrates the
293
instability of the emulsions. These emulsions were fully flocculated at all salt concentrations and
294
throughout the two-week storage period.
295
The larger particle size at pH 3 indicates that the pH value below the pI of the WPI
296
influenced aggregation to take place between the positively charged WPI and the negatively
297
charged XG. However, since salt was added after the pH was adjusted, the additional
298
homogenization may have broken up the aggregated clumps, which would account a smaller
299
particle size than expected (< 10 µm). Thus, an additional study (data not shown) at pH 3 was
300
conducted by adding the salt to the emulsion before the pH adjustment so that the aggregation
301
taking place would remain undisturbed. This experiment did result in significantly higher particle
302
sizes for both XG and XG-LBG emulsions, with the average between salt concentrations
13
303
occurring around 290 µm and 25 µm respectively, while droplets in LBG and WPI emulsions
304
remained small (2-3 µm). Guzey & McClements (2007) concluded that after an anionic
305
polysaccharide was able to adsorb to the droplets, the addition of salt resulted in greater stability
306
of the overall emulsion. Electrolytes affect the adsorption of the protein and polysaccharides onto
307
the oil droplet by influencing the magnitude of the charges found on the protein-coated oil
308
droplets and biopolymers, ultimately affecting the electrostatic interactions between the
309
stabilizers in the aqueous phase.
310
At all three NaCl concentrations, emulsions prepared at pH 7 displayed low particle
311
diameters without significant (p > 0.05) differences between day 1 and 14, suggesting that there
312
was minimal electrostatic attraction between the WPI-coated oil droplets and the
313
polysaccharides. McClements (2004) found that the particle size of emulsions with 0-200 mM
314
NaCl remained very small and did not have any significant changes until around 300 mM NaCl.
315
This indicates that the NaCl concentrations in our study did not have a significant effect on the
316
particle size of the emulsions, which is also similar to the results found by Cui, Cho,
317
McClements, Decker, & Park (2016).
318 319 320
3.3. Effect on viscosity of the emulsions At pH 3, emulsions containing XG had the highest viscosity, followed by XG-LBG
321
emulsions (Table 2). Both XG emulsions and XG-LBG emulsions experienced a large increase
322
in viscosity over time, significantly (p < 0.05) at 0 and 5 mM NaCl for XG-LBG emulsions and
323
at 5 mM NaCl for XG emulsions. On the other hand, both LBG and WPI emulsions decreased
324
over time, significantly (p < 0.05) for LBG at 0 and 50 mM NaCl. Among the salt levels of the
325
same gum type, XG-LBG emulsions viscosity significantly (p < 0.05) increased as the salt was
14
326
increased to 50 mM NaCl on day 1, and continued this trend after two weeks leading to XG-LBG
327
emulsion’s viscosity being highest at 50 mM NaCl. On the contrary, this trend was flipped at pH
328
7 for XG-LBG emulsions, as the viscosity significantly (p < 0.05) decreased from 0 mM to 50
329
mM NaCl on day 1, resulting in XG-LBG emulsions at 0 mM with the highest viscosity and the
330
highest stability overall at this pH. The higher viscosities at pH 7 are likely due to the strong
331
synergistic interaction between XG and LBG in XG-LBG-containing emulsions. This stabilizing
332
method can be seen in the emulsion microstructure (Fig. 2); the oil droplets retain their
333
individual integrities but have formed stabilized flocs. This is in contrast to the WPI and LBG
334
emulsions where the droplets are fully flocculated and larger in size.
335
Overall, XG emulsions at pH 3 showed the highest viscosities at every salt concentration.
336
The opposite charges increase the interaction between the the protein and polysaccharide,
337
leading to a more aggregated and viscous solution (Demetriades et al., 1997). The positively
338
charged WPI adsorbs to the oil droplet, repelling other positively charged substances; the
339
negatively charged XG will then be able to induce bridging flocculation. This phenomenon
340
occurs when a polysaccharide binds to WPI molecules on two different oil droplets, creating a
341
bridge between the two droplets (Mandala, Savvas, & Kostaropoulos, 2004; Blijdenstein, van
342
Winden, van Vliet, van der Linden, & van Aken, 2004). In the emulsion-making process, the salt
343
was added after the adsorption of gum molecules onto the surfaces of WPI-coated droplets,
344
which gave the XG time to create the bridge between droplets. This XG bridging would then be
345
advanced as the salt would promote association between protein-coated oil droplets because of
346
its electrostatic screening effect, essentially further increasing the viscosity.
347 348
The addition of salt has been shown to transition the structure of XG from a disordered, non-helical conformation to an ordered, helical conformation (Khouryieh, Herald, Aramouni, &
15
349
Alavi, 2007). The addition of salt to a solution at 25°C collapses the extended side chains of
350
xanthan gum via electrostatic screening, forcing the transition of the xanthan backbone from
351
disordered to ordered structure and therefore reducing viscosity of the solution (Khouryieh et al.,
352
2007). If the salt was added before the XG was given time to interact with the WPI-coated
353
droplets, then the side chains would collapse and the viscosity would be reduced; hence, the
354
order of emulsion formation is important in the overall stability of the emulsions.
355
In the absence of salt (0 mM NaCl) at pH 7, XG-LBG emulsions had the highest
356
viscosity. This is probably due to the lack of salt allows the XG-LBG synergistic interaction to
357
remain strong with no electrostatic interference. When the salt is added, it changes the
358
conformation of XG to ordered and thereby decreases the interaction with the LBG (Khouryieh
359
et al., 2007). The XG-LBG emulsions did not result in higher viscosity values than the XG
360
emulsions at pH 3, because the stabilizing effect of the XG bridging is stronger than the XG-
361
LBG synergistic relationship.
362 363 364
3.4. Effect on creaming stability The creaming stability of the emulsions was determined by measuring the creaming index
365
over 2-week period (Fig. 3). The creaming profile of the emulsions with different salt
366
concentrations was also established. The changes in salt concentration affected emulsions
367
containing XG-LBG or XG; however, it showed to have a limited effect on those containing only
368
LBG or WPI. With 0 mM NaCl at pH 3, emulsions containing XG alone were the most stable
369
among all gum types. With 0 mM NaCl at pH 3, all the emulsions displayed some creaming and
370
phase separation within the first 3 hours and were almost fully creamed within 48 hours. The
371
turbidity of the serum phase increased in the order of XG emulsions, LBG emulsions, XG-LBG
16
372
emulsions, to WPI emulsions. XG containing emulsions were generally less turbid than those
373
lacking XG due to the complexation between XG and WPI. Therefore, most of the
374
polysaccharides and WPI were in the cream layer.
375
At pH 7, all the emulsions, excluding XG-LBG emulsions, displayed some creaming and
376
phase separation within the first 3 hours. XG emulsions remained the least turbid out of all the
377
gum types while LBG and WPI remained consistent in their turbidity. These trends are observed
378
at every salt concentration. XG-LBG emulsions at pH 7 were the most stable at 0 and 5 mM
379
NaCl. This can be related to the higher viscosity in the continuous phase because of the strong
380
synergistic effect between XG and LBG in the absence of salt content (Khouryieh et al., 2007).
381
The increased creaming stability with no salt added is supported by Ogawa, Decker, and
382
McClements (2004), who found that salt induces greater screening between charged particles and
383
thereby induces flocculation and potentially coalescence.
384
With 5 mM NaCl at pH 3, XG emulsions and XG-LBG emulsions were equally the most
385
stable against creaming. XG-LBG emulsions were the most stable until approximately 216 hours
386
where it is slightly surpassed by XG emulsions. The addition of low NaCl content most likely
387
reduced some of electrostatic barriers between the XG and WPI, thereby allowing the XG to
388
create stronger bridges between the WPI-coated droplets. The stronger interactions would cause
389
a slower separation of phases. The addition of low NaCl content did not have the same effect on
390
the XG-LBG containing emulsions. The LBG already diminishes the ability of XG to form
391
bridges with the WPI, and the addition of salt further detracts from this capability by collapsing
392
the remaining side chains that are not interacting with the WPI. Due to the lack of XG-bridging
393
occurring in the XG-LBG emulsions, the viscosity is lower at pH 3 and therefore the creaming
394
stability is lesser as well. At pH 7, XG-LBG emulsions were more stable than XG emulsions
17
395
with no creaming at all. This is due to the NaCl content (5 mM) is no not high enough to
396
overcome the resulting high viscosity from the synergistic interaction between XG and LBG.
397
At 50 mM NaCl, XG-LBG emulsions became of equal turbidity with emulsions
398
containing XG. With increasing salt concentrations, XG and XG-LBG emulsions became
399
gradually less turbid, which resulted in the clarity of the 50 mM salt concentration emulsions
400
after 336 hours. Adding high NaCl concentration to the emulsion, thereby increasing the amount
401
of electrolyte in the aqueous phase, reduces the electrostatic interactions between the protein-
402
coated oil droplets. The droplets can then come into contact with one another and flocculate in
403
the cream layer, resulting in a clear serum phase. This can be seen in the microstructure of the
404
emulsions (Fig. 2). As the salt concentration increases, the individual droplets become more
405
flocculated in emulsions stabilized by XG and the mixture of XG-LBG. Emulsions stabilized by
406
LBG and WPI flocculated at every salt concentration.
407
The creaming index indicates that XG-LBG emulsions with 0 and 5 mM NaCl at pH 7
408
were significantly more stable than the other emulsions. Conversely, 50 mM NaCl XG emulsions
409
were the most stable overall. As detailed by McClements (2015) and Demetriades et al. (1997),
410
after adding to the emulsion, the salt reduces the electrostatic interactions between the protein-
411
coated oil droplets. The screening of electrostatic interactions between charged emulsion droplets
412
is due to the attraction of counter ions to the surface of the droplets. When adding abundant salt,
413
the screening could hinder the repulsive forces between the droplets, allowing them to collide
414
with one another, leading to increased flocculation and therefore decreased physicochemical
415
stability. This is also supported by the magnitude and range of the electrostatic repulsion
416
between two droplets decreases as the ionic strength of the surrounding solution increases
417
because of the electrostatic screening.
18
418 419 420
3.5. Effect on lipid oxidation Lipid hydroperoxide concentrations of emulsions at 0 mM, 5 mM, and 50 mM NaCl were
421
measured over a function of storage time at both pH 3 and 7 (Fig. 4). At pH 3, all the gum types
422
remain relatively close together, a trend that is seen at every salt concentration at this pH.
423
Whereas, at pH 7, XG-LBG emulsions had the lowest lipid hydroperoxide concentrations at all
424
NaCl concentrations, indicating the highest stability. This is possibly related to the enhanced
425
viscosity of continuous phase due to the synergistic interaction between XG and LBG gums. The
426
increased viscosity due to XG-LBG interaction may have enhanced the oxidative stability of
427
WPI-coated droplets at pH 7 by forming a secondary thick layer around the WPI-coated droplets
428
through WPI-XG-LBG complex. XG emulsions had the second-most stable results, and the LBG
429
and WPI emulsions displayed almost identical results. Amongst the three salt concentrations,
430
however, emulsions with 0 mM NaCl had the best oxidative stability. With 50 mM NaCl, all four
431
emulsions at both pH values displayed results that were closer together than the results observed
432
at 0 and 5 mM NaCl. For pH 3, this makes it difficult to decisively decide which emulsion had
433
the best results. Conversely, at pH 7 the XG-LBG emulsions still had the lowest lipid
434
hydroperoxide concentration, although this concentration was still higher than the lesser salt
435
concentrations. XG emulsions had the second-most stable results, and the LBG and WPI
436
emulsions displayed almost identical results indicating that XG-LBG emulsions are the most
437
positively affected emulsion type at a high ionic strength. It can be seen that as the concentration
438
of NaCl increases, the difference between XG-LBG emulsion and the other gum emulsions
439
decreases. This is because increasing amounts of NaCl change the conformation of xanthan
440
gum’s structure from disordered to ordered state by collapsing its side chains due to electrostatic
19
441
screening. As previously stated, XG can interact strongly with LBG when in its disordered state.
442
This disordered state is changed to “ordered” at NaCl concentrations above 10 mM, indicating a
443
loss of XG-LBG synergistic interactions at these salt concentrations (Khouryieh et al., 2007).
444
This decrease in the synergistic interaction between XG and LBG decreases the viscosity of the
445
emulsion reducing the physical and, thus, the chemical stability by further decreasing the
446
electrostatic repulsions between the oil droplets and decreasing the secondary thick layer of XG-
447
LBG around the WPI-coated droplets. In the presence of added iron, NaCl has been shown to
448
slightly increase the rate of lipid oxidation (Mei, McClements, Wu, & Decker, 1998a; Mei,
449
Decker, & McClements, 1998b). This prooxidant effect could be because of NaCl’s capability to
450
increase the catalytic activity of iron (Osinchak, Hultin, Zajicek, Kelleher, & Huang, 1992).
451
Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) concentrations are an indication of the
452
secondary by products produced during the termination phase of lipid oxidation. The
453
concentration trendline of emulsions at both pH values increases sharply until around weeks 2 or
454
3, levels off until about week 6, and decreases slightly until week 8 (Fig. 5). The TBARS assay
455
measures lipid peroxidation end-product malondialdehyde (MDA) generated from the
456
decomposition of lipid hydroperoxides. This slight decrease in TBARS at week 8 could be
457
related to the reduction of MDA due to the decomposition of secondary lipid oxidation products.
458
With 0 or 5 mM NaCl at pH 3, XG emulsions had the lowest TBARS concentration and
459
therefore the highest oxidative stability. This result is switched to XG-LBG emulsions for pH 7,
460
which can be explained by the loss of XG-WPI interaction at this pH as well as the increased
461
synergism seen between the XG and LBG at the neutral pH value. At 5 mM NaCl and pH 3, the
462
addition of salt most likely begins to disrupt the disordered conformation of the XG, as explained
463
before, which detracts from the ability of XG to form stabilizing XG-bridges. At pH 7, the values
20
464
for XG-LBG continued to be isolated from the other emulsions, and the small amount of salt
465
begins to disrupt the interaction between the XG and LBG, but not enough to fully override the
466
strong synergism between them.
467
At 50 mM NaCl, TBARS concentrations were closer to one another than they were at
468
both 0 and 5 mM for both pH values. At pH 3, XG emulsions relatively had the best oxidative
469
stability, whereas at pH 7, the XG-LBG emulsions remained the most stable with the lowest
470
TBARS concentrations. The reason behind XG emulsions having better stability at pH 3, while
471
XG-LBG emulsions are more stable at pH 7, is due to the pI occurring around 4.8 (Demetriades
472
et al., 1997). At pH 3, the WPI switches to a positive charge leading to a protein-polysaccharide
473
interaction with the anionic XG. XG has also been shown to chelate transition metal ions at
474
negatively charged sites, thus averting the close contact with the lipid phase and inhibiting lipid
475
oxidation (Shimada, Fujikawa, Yahara, & Nakamura, 1992). These factors are more beneficial
476
than the synergistic relationship between XG-LBG at pH 3, especially as the synergistic
477
relationship decreases with the increase in salt.
478 479
4. Conclusion
480
The results indicated that the addition of NaCl had a significant impact on the physical
481
and chemical stabilities of the O/W emulsions depending on the type of biopolymer and pH of
482
the emulsion. The addition of NaCl affected the physical stability of WPI-stabilized emulsions
483
containing XG-LBG mixtures or XG alone; however, it had a limited effect on those containing
484
only LBG or WPI. With 0 mM NaCl at pH 3, emulsions containing XG alone were the most
485
stable among all gum types. At pH 7, WPI-stabilized emulsions containing XG-LBG mixtures
486
with 0 and 5 mM NaCl were significantly more stable than the other emulsions, while XG
21
487
containing emulsions with 50 mM NaCl were the most stable overall. The lipid oxidation results
488
indicated that the NaCl level had a very little effect on the oxidative stability of the emulsions
489
containing XG-LBG mixtures at every salt concentration, and hence, WPI-stabilized emulsions
490
containing XG-LBG mixtures had provided better oxidative stability than emulsions containing
491
either XG or LBG alone. This study suggests that a multilayer system consisting of WPI-XG-
492
LBG layers could be used as a delivery system for microencapsulating omega-3 polyunsaturated
493
fatty acids for use in functional foods.
494 495 496
Acknowledgment This research was supported by grants from the United States Department of
497
Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Grant #. 11281827) and Kentucky NSF
498
EPSCoR (No. 1355438).
499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518
22
519
References
520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563
1. Aoki, T., Decker, E. A., & McClements, D. J. (2005). Influence of environmental stresses of on stability of O/W emulsions containing droplets stabilized by multilayered membranes produced by a layer-by-layer electrostatic deposition technique. Food Hydrocolloids, 19, 209-220. 2. Arab-Tehrany, E., Jacquot, M., Gaiani, C., Imran, M., Desobry, S., & Linder, M. (2012). Beneficial effects and oxidative stability of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 25, 24-33. 3. Barak, S. & Mudgil, D. (2014). Locust bean gum: Processing, properties and food applications—a review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 66, 74-80. 4. Berton-Carabin, C., Ropers, M., & Genot, C. (2014). Lipid oxidation in oil-in-water emulsions: Involvement of the interfacial layer. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, 13(5), 945-977.
5. Blijdenstein, T., van Winden, A., van Vliet, T., van der Linden, E., & van Aken, G. (2004). Serum separation and structure of depletion- and bridging- flocculated emulsions: A comparison. Colloids and Surfaces A, 245, 41-48. 6. Bresolin, T. M. B., Sander, P. C., Reicher, F., Sierakowski, M. R., Rinaudo, M., & Ganter, J. L. M. S. (1997). Viscometric studies on xanthan and galactomannan systems. Carbohydrate Polymers, 33, 131-138.
7. Charoen, R., Jangchud, A., Jangchud, K., Harnsilawat, T., Naivikul, O., & McClements, D. J. (2011). Influence of biopolymer emulsifier type on the formation and stability of rice bran oil-in-water emulsions: Whey protein, gum Arabic, and modified starch. Journal of Food Science, 76(1), E165-E172. 8. Cui, L., Cho, H. T., McClements, D. J., Decker, E. A., & Park, Y. (2016). Effects of salts on oxidative stability of lipids in Tween-20 stabilized oil-in-water emulsions. Food chemistry, 197, 1130-1135. 9. Demetriades, K., Coupland, J. N., & McClements, D. J. (1997). Physical properties of whey protein stabilized emulsions as related to pH and NaCl. Journal of Food Science, 62(2), 346. 10. Elias, R., McClements, D. J., & Decker, E. (2005). Antioxidant activity of cysteine, tryptophan, and methionine residues in continuous phase β-lactoglobulin in oil-in-water emulsions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53, 10248-10253. 11. Ellulu, M. S., Khaza’ai, H., Abed, Y., Rahmat, A., Ismail, P., & Ranneh, Y. (2015). Role of fish oil in human health and possible mechanism to reduce inflammation. Inflammopharmacology, 23, 79-89.
23
564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608
12. Gordon, M. H. (2001). The development of oxidative rancidity in foods. Antioxidants in food: Practical applications. CRC Press. 13. Goycoolea, F. M., Morris, E. R., & Gidley, M. J. (1995). Viscosity of galactomannans at alkaline and neutral pH: evidence of ‘hyperentanglement’ in solution. Carbohydrate Polymers, 27(1), 69-71. 14. Grigoriev, D. O. & Miller, R. (2009). Mono- and multilayer covered drops as carriers. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 14, 48-59. 15. Gu, Y. S., Decker, E. A., & McClements, D. J. (2004). Influence of pH and ι-carrageenan concentration on physicochemical properties and stability of β-lactoglobulin-stabilized oil-inwater emulsions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52(11), 3626-3632. 16. Guzey, D., & McClements, D. J., (2006). Formation, stability, and properties of multilayer emulsions for application in the food industry. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 128-130, 227-248. 17. Guzey, D., & McClements, D. J. (2007). Impact of electrostatic interactions on formation and stability of emulsions containing oil droplets coated by β-lactoglobulin-pectin complexes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55(2), 475-485. 18. Khouryieh, H. A., Herald, T. J., Aramouni, F., & Alavi, S. (2007). Intrinsic viscosity and viscoelastic properties of xanthan/guar mixtures in dilute solutions: Effect of salt concentration on the polymer interactions. Food Research International, 40(7), 883-893. 19. Khouryieh, H., Puli, G., Williams, K., & Aramouni, F. (2015). Effects of xanthan–locust bean gum mixtures on the physicochemical properties and oxidative stability of whey protein stabilised oil-in-water emulsions. Food chemistry, 167, 340-348. 20. Laguerre, M., Lecomte, J., & Villeneuve, P. (2007). Evaluation of the ability of antioxidants to counteract lipid oxidation: Existing methods, new trends and challenges. Progress in Lipid Research, 46(5), 244-282. 21. Long, Z., Zhao, Q., Liu, T., Kuang, W., Xu, J., & Zhao, M. (2013). Influence of xanthan gum on physical characteristics of sodium caseinate solutions and emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids, 32(1), 123-129. 22. Mandala, I. G., Savvas, T. P., & Kostaropoulos, A. E. (2004). Xanthan and locust bean gum influence of the rheology and structure of white model-sauce. Journal of Food Engineering, 64, 335-342. 23. McClements, D. J. (2004). Protein-stabilized emulsions. Current opinion in colloid & interface science, 9(5), 305-313.
24
609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653
24. McClements, D. J. (2015). Food emulsions: principles, practice, and techniques. CRC Series in Contemporary Food Science. 25. McClements, D. J., & Decker, E. A. (2000). Lipid oxidation in oil‐in‐water emulsions: Impact of molecular environment on chemical reactions in heterogeneous food systems. Journal of Food Science, 65(8), 1270-1282. 26. McClements, D. J., Decker, E. A., & Weiss, J. (2007). Emulsion-based delivery systems for lipophilic bioactive components. Journal of Food Science, 72(8), R109-R124.
27. Mei, L. Y., McClements, D.J., Wu, J. N., & Decker, E. A. (1998a). Iron-catalyzed lipid oxidation in emulsion as affected by surfactant, pH and NaCl. Food Chemistry, 61, 307–312. 28. Mei, L. Y., Decker, E. A., & McClements, D. J. (1998b). Evidence of iron association with emulsion droplets and its impact on lipid oxidation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46, 5072–5077. 29. Nielsen, N. S., Horn, A. F., & Jacobsen, C. (2013). Effect of emulsifier type, pH and iron on oxidative stability of 5% fish oil‐in‐water emulsions. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 115(8), 874-889. 30. Ogawa, S., Decker, E. A., & McClements, D. J. (2004). Production and characterization of O/W emulsions containing droplets stabilized by lecithin-chitosan-pectin multilayered membranes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 3595-3600. 31. Osinchak, J. E., Hultin, H. O., Zajicek, O. T., Kelleher, S. D., & Huang, C. (1992). Effect of NaCl on catalysis of lipid oxidation by the soluble fraction of fish muscle. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 12, 35–41. 32. Owens, C., Griffin, K., Khouryieh, H., & Williams, K. (2018). Creaming and Oxidative Stability of Fish Oil-in-water Emulsions Stabilized by Whey Protein-Xanthan-Locust Bean Complexes: Impact of pH. Food Chemistry, 239, 314-322. 33. Shantha, N. C., & Decker, E. A. (1994). Rapid, sensitive, iron-based spectrophotometric methods for determination of peroxide values of food lipids. Journal of AOAC International, 77(2), 421-424. 34. Shimada, K., Fujikawa, K., Yahara, K., & Nakamura, T. (1992). Antioxidative properties of xanthan on the autoxidation of soybean oil in emulsion. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 40, 945–948. 35. Simopoulos, A. P. (1991). Omega-3 fatty acids in health and disease and in growth and development. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 54(3), 438-463.
25
654 655 656 657 658 659 660
36. Sun, C., Gunasekaran, S., & Richards, M. P. (2007). Effect of xanthan gum on physicochemical properties of whey protein isolate stabilized oil-in-water emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids, 21(4), 555-564. 37. Tako, M., Asato, A., & Nakamura, S. (1984). Rheological aspects of the intermolecular
interaction between xanthan and locust bean gum in aqueous media. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 48(12), 2995-3000.
661 662
26
Table 1. Effect of ionic strength and pH on the particle size of fish O/W emulsions stabilized by WPI-XG-LBG complexes as a function of storage time. pH 3 NaCl(mM)
XG-LBG
Day 1 XG
Day 14 LBG
WPI
XG-LBG
XG
LBG
WPI
0
5.0±0.05Ab
8.7±0.3Aa
2.5±0.07Aa
3.5±0.9Aa
5.1±0.3Aa
8.3±0.01Aa
2.8±0.04Ba
2.9±0.06Aa
5
4.3±0.04Aa
8.6±0.02Aa
2.5±0.02Aa
3.7±0.0Aa
4.7±0.06Ba
8.0±0.3Aa
2.7±0.01Ba
3.1±0.9Aa
50
4.2±0.2Aa
8.6±0.1Aa
3.5±0.2Ab
3.1±0.4Aa
4.6±0.1Aa
8.4±0.1Aa
14.0±3.1Bb
2.9±0.2Aa
pH 7 NaCl(mM)
XG-LBG
Day 1 XG
Day 14 LBG
WPI
XG-LBG
XG
LBG
WPI
0
2.2±0.0Aa
2.2±0.02Aa
2.5±0.4Aa
3.1±0.4Aa
5.1±4.1Aa
2.2±0.02Aa
2.3±0.01Aa
2.7±0.5Aa
5
2.1±0.0Aa
2.3±0.01Aa
2.4±0.2Aa
3.1±0.3Aa
2.3±0.2Aa
2.4±0.0Bb
2.5±0.02Ab
3.0±0.06Aa
50
2.3±0.03Ab
2.9±0.3Aa
2.5±0.1Aa
2.9±0.4Aa
2.4±0.1Aa
2.5±0.0Ac
2.5±0.02Ab
3.3±0.2Aa
ABC = different letters indicate a significant (P < 0.05) difference between day1 and day 14
for the same gum type and salt concentration. abc = different letters in columns indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among the salt levels of the same gum type.
Table 2. Effect of ionic strength and pH on the viscosity (Pa.s) of fish O/W emulsions stabilized by WPIXG-LBG complexes as a function of storage time at shear rate of 10s-1. pH 3 NaCl(mM) XG-LBG 0.0205± 0 0.0017Aa
Day 1 XG 0.2760± 0.1410Aa
LBG 0.0529± 0.0039Aa
WPI 0.0390± 0.0091Aa
XG-LBG 0.2900± 0.0614Ba
XG 0.6820± 0.2550Aa
Day 14 LBG 0.0255± 0.0021Ba
WPI 0.0291± 0.0036Aa
5
0.0311± 0.0045Aa
0.4880± 0.0382Aa
0.0807± 0.0219Aa
0.0457± 0.0129Aa
0.3570± 0.0985Ba
0.9690± 0.0589Ba
0.0308± 0.0010Aa
0.0021± 0.0071Aa
50
0.1540± 0.0387Ab
0.3840± 0.0982Aa
0.0992± 0.0150Aa
0.0227± 0.0087Aa
0.5060± 0.1540Aa
0.9920± 0.3600Aa
0.0460± 0.0071Ba
0.0126± 0.0003Aa
XG-LBG 0.5070± 0.0377Aa
Day 1 XG 0.1180± 0.0032Aa
LBG 0.0486± 0.0112Aa
WPI 0.0274± 0.0118Aa
XG-LBG 0.2980± 0.0073Ba
XG 0.1280± 0.0015Aa
Day 14 LBG 0.0238± 0.0026Aa
WPI 0.0133± 0.0007Aa
5
0.3030± 0.0099Ab
0.1230± 0.0061Aa
0.0618± 0.0095Aa
0.0146± 0.0012Aa
0.3090± 0.1600Aa
0.1220± 0.0006Aa
0.0143± 0.0012Ba
0.0189± 0.0007Ba
50
0.1700± 0.0289Ac
0.1170± 0.0072Aa
0.0587± 0.0010Aa
0.0250± 0.0010Aa
0.2640± 0.0552Aa
0.1070± 0.0050Ab
0.0143± 0.0039Ba
0.0162± 0.0052Aa
pH 7 NaCl(mM) 0
ABC = different letters indicate a significant (P < 0.05) difference between day1 and day 14
for the same gum type and salt concentration. abc = different letters in columns indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among the salt levels
of the same gum type.
Zeta Potential (mV)
Day 1
Day 14
25 20
c
15 10 5
a a
b
ab
b
a
0 -5 LBG
XG
Day 14
-20
b -40
c
a ac
c
a
b a
-60
XG-LBG
WPI
LBG
XG
WPI
5 mM NaCl
5 mM NaCl
0
25
-10
20
Zeta Potential (mV)
Zeta Potential (mV)
Day 1
-80 XG-LBG
-20
c
15
b
10
c
-30
c
-40
d
a a XG
LBG
a ab
b a
-60 -70
0 XG-LBG
c b
a ab
-50
b 5
0 mM NaCl
0
Zeta Potential (mV)
0 mM NaCl
30
XG-LBG
WPI
LBG
XG
WPI
50 mM NaCl c b
20 15
b
b
b
10
a 5
a a
0 XG-LBG
XG
50 mM NaCl
0
Zeta Potential (mV)
Zeta Potential (mV)
25 -10 -20 -30 -40
a
-50 -60
a
a
b
a b
a c
-70 LBG
Gum Type
WPI
XG-LBG
XG
LBG
WPI
Gum Type
Figure 1. Effect of NaCl addition on the ζ-potential of fish O/W emulsions stabilized by WPI-XG-LBG complexes at pH 3 (left) and pH 7 (right). A WPI-whey protein isolate, LBG-locust bean gum, XG-xanthan gum, XG-LBG- xanthan-locust bean gum. abcd = different letters indicate a significant (P < 0.05) difference between gums for the same pH and salt
concentration.
pH3
pH7
(A)
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
(B)
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
(C)
Figure 2. Microstructure of O/W emulsions stabilized by WPI-XG-LBG complexes (A) 0 mM NaCl, (B) 5 mM NaCl, (C) 50 mM NaCl. i. Optical microscope images scale crosspends to 20 µM. XG-LBG- Xanthan-Locust Bean, ii. XG- xanthan gum, iii. LBGLocust bean gum iv. WPI-Whey protein isolate.
pH 3
pH 7
0 mM NaCl
0 mM NaCl
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Creaming Index (%)
Creaming Index (%)
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0
100
200
300
5 mM NaCl
100
200
300
5 mM NaCl
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Creaming Index (%)
Creaming Index (%)
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
0
0
100
200
300
0
100
200
300
50 mM NaCl
50 mM NaCl
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Creaming Index (%)
Creaming Index (%)
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0
100
200
0
300
100
200
Storage time (hr)
Storage time (hr)
300
Figure 3. Effect of NaCl on the creaming index of fish O/W emulsions stabilized by WPI-XGLBG complexes at pH 3 and 7. -whey protein isolate -locust bean gum -xanthan gum -xanthan-locust bean gum.
pH 3
pH 7
0 mM NaCl
0 mM NaCl 0.2
LHP (mmol/kg)
LHP (mmol/kg)
0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0
0.15 0.1 0.05 0
0
2
4
6
8
0
2
4
6
8
5 mM NaCl
5 mM NaCl
0.2
LHP (mmol/kg)
LHP (mmol/kg)
0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0
0.15 0.1 0.05 0
0
2
4
6
8
0
4
6
8
6
8
50 mM NaCl
50 mM NaCl 0.2
LHP (mmol/kg)
0.2
LHP (mmol/kg)
2
0.15 0.1 0.05 0
0.15 0.1 0.05 0
0
2
4
Storage Time (Weeks)
6
8
0
2
4
Storage Time (Weeks)
Figure 4. Effect of NaCl on the lipid hydroperoxide (LHP) concentrations of fish O/W emulsions stabilized by WPI-XG-LBG complexes at pH 3 and 7. Lipid hydroperoxides in menhaden oil (no added WPI, XG, LBG) was 0.0391 mmol/kg oil. -whey protein isolate -locust bean gum -xanthan gum -xanthan-locust bean gum.
pH 3
pH 7
0 mM NaCl
0 mM NaCl 50
TBARS (mmol/kg)
TBARS (mmol/kg)
50 40 30 20 10 0 2
4
6
20 10
8
0
5 mM NaCl TBARS (mmol/kg)
40 30 20 10 0
2
4
6
8
6
8
6
8
5 mM NaCl
50
50
TBARS (mmol/kg)
30
0 0
40 30 20 10 0
0
2
4
6
8
0
50 mM NaCl TBARS (mmol/kg)
40 30 20 10 0
2
4
50 mM NaCl
50
50
TBARS (mmol/kg)
40
40 30 20 10 0
0
2
4
Storage Time (Weeks)
6
8
0
2
4
Storage Time (Weeks)
Figure 5. TBARS concnetrations of fish O/W emulsions stabilized by WPI-XG-LBG complexes as a function of NaCl and pH. TBARS concentrations in menhaden oil (no added WPI, XG, LBG) was 1.5633 mmol/kg oil -whey protein isolate -locust bean gum -xanthan gum -xanthan-locust bean gum.
Highlights 1. The effect of NaCl on the stability of O/W emulsions stabilized by WPI-XG-LBG layers was investigated. 2. XG-LBG had the highest creaming stability at 0mM and 5mM NaCl at pH 7; while XG had the highest at 50mM NaCl. 3. XG-LBG emulsions had the highest oxidative stability at every NaCl concentration at pH 7.
Author Contributions Section Kristen Griffin carried out the experiments and took the lead in writing the manuscript. Hanna Khouryieh conceived and planned the experiments, supervised the project, conducted the statistical analysis, contributed to the interpretation of the results and final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest and Authorship Conformation Form Please check the following as appropriate: o All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version. o
This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue.
o
The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript
o
The following authors have affiliations with organizations with direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript:
Author’s name
Affiliation