.73 cv Ii EI.140”~
-
f?olh.%kdowskri,Li/ o!smpIc4 3Mev Bremsssrrahluq =25 *v h :1.6.n~+ EIn xc Simpson
-
Temperature
of Irradiation
[
*I al /6/
0 1 WV
electrons
W]
FIG. 1. Pinning rates i vs. temperature of irradiation Tirr as derived from damping and modulus measuremenIt of different authors.
In two foregoing papers, also the present authors have demonstrated the existence of such a minimum(s,9) as is shown also in Fig. 1. They argued, however, that the interpretation in terms of conversion of interstitials is not justified. They gave experimental evidence that the numbers for@ leading to such a minimum are not the true pinning rates but apparent numbers connected with internal friction effects not yet clearly understood. Their main reasons were the following (see Fig. 1) : (i) The (relative) depth of the minimum of @A found by the present authors after irradiation with 3 MeV-electrons and with 3 MeV-Bremsstrahlung was much smaller than that found by Thompson and Buck after irradiation with CoBo-y-rays of comparable dose. There was the suspicion that the depth of t,he minimum increases with decreasing mean energy {&) transferred to the primary knock-on, but a pronounced irreproducibility of this depth indicated an influence of parameters not yet recognized. (ii) The depth of the minimum obtained from modulus measurements (i.e. using pnl-values) was found to be considerably smaller than that obtained from damping measurements (i.e. using p,-values). Thompson and Buck had a similar result, but pointed out that their modulus might not be reliable. In their case the specimen had very little thermal contact t,o the surrounding so that by the y-heating the temperature of the specimen and, therefore, its modulus
might have changed in an uncontrolled way. In the experiments of the present authors this difficulty did not exist so that their pfil-values are as accurate as the p,-values. (iii) Preliminary results indicated that the minimum occurred not as function of the temperature of irradiat,ion Tirr (as necessary for the interpretation in terms of thermal conversion of interstitials) but as function of temperature of measurements T, (compare the open and filled triangles in Fig. 1). This could not be recognized by Thompson and Buck and by Simpson et al. since they took their measurements always at the temperature of irradiation. The purpose of the present paper is to contribute to further clarification of these points. Therefore, the previous pinning rate measurement for which irradiations with 3 MeV electrons have been used have been supplemented by measurements with 1.5 MeV and 0.52 RIeV electrons. In these measurements, the temperature of irradiat,ion and the temperature of measurement have been varied independent of each other and, in particular, the strain amplitude dependence has been investigated. 2. EXPERIMENTAL
PROCEDURE
Polycrystalline samples were prepared of 99.999 % ASARCO copper, the same material as it was used by Thompson and Buckt2) and in the former experiments of the present authors, (s*9)In order to achieve a homogeneous radiation damage samples with a thickness
LtfCKF,
et al.:
DAMPIKG
AND
MODULUS
~0.1 mm had to be used. They were punched out from 0.1 mm copper sheet in a form shown in Fig. 2(a). The essential part S of the sample (1 x 1 mm) is excited to torsional vibrations of about 5 kHz by lateral forces acting on the lever arm L. The strain amplitudes E have been varied from 1 x IO-’ to 1 x 10e6. In order not to obtain uncontrolled vibrations in the lever arm it was stiffened by spot-welding an additional piece of copper sheet to the lever arm and by bending it. parallel to its edge to a L-shape crosssection. The lower part (10 x 10 mm) of the sample is clamped to the sample holder (see Fig. 2b). The sample holder is attached to a liquid nitrogen cryostat, by which the temperature of the sample can be changed between 78 K and 800 K. The electrodes E, and E, (steel sheet, 0.1 mm thick) are attached to the sample holder with the insulat,ors 1; and I, (Mycroy, Molecular Dielectrics, Clifton, New Jersey). These electrodes which have a distance of about 0.1 mm to the lever arm, have the purpose to excite the oscillations electrostatically and to detect them using a frequency modulation of a 150 MHzoscillator. The AF-signal which is received after demodulation of this 150 MHz-signal and which is L
al
Fro. 2. Sample and sample holder. (a) Geometry of the sample. L is the lever arm for the torsional vibrations of the part S. The dimensions are given in mm. (b) Sample holder, to which the sample is clamped. The electrodes E, and .Ez we fixed on the insuiators 1, and I,.
OF
ELECTRON-IRRADI;ITr;I)
(‘11
239
proportionally to the sample vibration, is fed back to the exciting electrode, giving rise to a self-excitation of the sample. According to Thompson and Glassoo) this feedback can be used after correct phasing for measuring both damping and shear modulus: The amplification of the feedback circuit which is needed to produce a given amplitude of vibration can be used as a measure for the damping and the frequency of the self excited vibration as a measure for the shear modulus. In the present paper a slightly modified form of this method has been used for measuring the amplitude dependence of damping. Further information on sample and method of measurements are given in.“l). In contrast to the normally used flexural vibrations of thin cantilevered beam&+-i’) where the strain amplitude decreases along the sample in =-direction (see Fig. 2), the here used t.orsion-sample is deformed equally over its whole lengt,h*. Since each element, of the sample contributes to damping and modulus with the square of its amplitude, damping measurements of flexural vibrations are determined by the part of the sample nearest t,o the clamp. These parts, houever, are affected most by changes in clamping, e.g. during temperature cycles, so that it is diflicult to obtain good reproducibility. Such complications do not exist for torsional vibrations, and the good reproducibility of the present measurements is ascribed to this fact. All results presented here are obtained with one sample. Before irradiation, the sample, already mounted in the cryostat, was annealed at 800°K for $ hr. The irradiations were performed with elect,rons with an energy of either 0.52 or 1.5 MeV. After each irradiation the sample was recovered in &tu by annealing at 770°K for 5 min. This trestmcnt, led reproducibly to the condition of the sample before irradiat,ion. The irradiation dose cb is given in each figure. Equat~ions (1) and (2) were used to calculate the numbers p, and p, of irradiation-induced pinning points from the observed changes in damping and modulus. In order to apply these equations the background values for decrement and modulus, which characterize the dislocation-free crystal, are needed. They were determined by irradiation with 1 r; 10’6 electron per cm2 and subsequent annealing at 400°K for 5 min; this treatment led to complete dislocation * The stress state obtained by torsion of a thin rectangular beam is in first approximation a pure shear stress state with only the component cl,” (see Fig. 2a) different from zero. The magnitude of the stress is independent of z, nearly independent of z and increasing in y-direction nearly proportionally with the distance from the neutral plane.“8
_1CTA
"40
METALLURGIC-~,
VOL.
pinning. The p-values deduced either from modulus or from damping were normally found to be somewhat different so that it is necessary to distinguish between them. 3. EXPERIMENTAL
21,
1973
50 K
120
160 K
RESULTS
Figure 3 gives the results of isothermal irradiation experiments at 78 and 160°K with 0.52 MeV-electrons and a flux of 5.7 x 1Ol1 electrons/cm2 sec. The p,values obtained from measurements during irradiation
40 . *F 4 E 30.
240 K
z : 0”
20.
10
2
0
4 6 8 10 Strain Amplitude = 10’
12
FIG. 4. Decrement of the unirradiated sample vs. strain amplitude for T, = 78, 120, 160 and 240°K.
‘g h
015.
E=4.10S’ T,,, =78K
0.1 b)
dependence of the amplitude dependent damping of the unirradiated sample has been investigated. Figure 4 shows that the amplitude dependence is the more pronounced the lower the measuring temperature T,. Examples for the amplitude dependence of the decrement of the irradiated sample give Figs. 5 and 6. Here the curves for different electron doses (E = 1.5 MeV) are plott,ed for Tirr = T, = 78 and 160°K. Except for the small increase at low doses and large amplitudes at 160°K (which is close to the experimental
1
L, = T,,, q 78 K E = 1.5 MeV 0
5
10 irradiation
T, = T,,,) are plotted vs. the irradiation time t for the strain amplitudes E = 1 x lo-’ (Fig. 3a) and 4 x lo-’ (Fig. 3b). One recognizes that p, is larger for 78°K than for 160”K, but. this difference is much larger for t,he larger strain amplitude. The initial slope of these curves is generally used as pinning rate $. Thus one obtains at small strain amplitudes a pinning rate rather independent of temperature and at large strain amplitudes a decrease in # by going from 78 to 160°K. Because of this temperature dependence of Ij at large strain amDlitudes also the temperature (i.e.
I
.
40
.
Time [min]
FIQ. 3. Pinning point numbers pa derived from damping measurements vs. irradiation time for T, = Tirr = 78°K and T, = Ti,,= 160°K. (a) for the strain amplitudr R = 1 x IO-‘, (b) fore = 4 x IO-:.
”
50
*
“p Q & 30. E F x a 20. 160 K lo-
I,
0
.
2
.,
4 Shin
,
,
6 8 Amplitude ~10’
,
,
10
,
,
12
Flc. 5. Decrement vs. strain amplitude for T, = Ti,, = 78°K and different electron doses 0 (in cl/cm*).
LUCKE
et al.:
DAMPING
AXD
MODULUS
OF
order
are determined
$510” 40.9 0 Q w-
5.10” 25.1d3 1 ,lO” 15.10U
.
3,10y
-
of equations
(1)
of the influence of strain amplitude
on
the effect of a dose of 5 x 1013 el/cm2 is considered. For
78°K
T, = Tirr =
(filled squares)
an increase of p, with E and for (open circles) a decrease.
g 20. Y n
these two
curves
minimum,
one recognizes
much
gives
strain amplitude. are introduced
0
*
2
.
4
s
.
.
.
.
’
*
for
1
L
6 8 10 12 Strain Amplitude =lO’ FIG. 6. Decrement vs. strain amplitude for T, = Tirr = 160°K and different electron doses @ (in el/cme).
inaccuracy) rement.
In order to check measurements
the irradiation generally decreases the dec-
are, as in the unirradiated
from
At large doses, however, these differences
tend to disappear
and the curves for both tempera-
tures look rather similar. are obtained
case, rather different
Corresponding
for the modulus
Since equations amplitude
independent
and
Pm
as
functions
however, consideration
often
of
strain
p-values
0
’
2
.
.
4
into Fig. 7 (filled circles). case of a fixed measuring (6
from
both PA and
0)
78 to 160°K
crease at any point. and
amplitude. are
.
6
P,
and also
One recognizes temperature increase,
In
calculated
.
’
8
In
.
Strain
of
introduced that in the
of
when
This
(W -+ a).
temperature
of the strain amplitude.
o- .
were performed
valid for the
modulus change, it has no physical meaning to present literature,
at
160’K
Tirr =
for the various strain amplitudes,
part of damping
(open ellipses).
T, = Tirr were considered. the effect of T, or Tirr singly, also T, = 78°K after irradiation at
sets of curves
change.
(1) and (2) are only
is obtained
So far only cases with
At small doses the curves for 78 and 160°K
each other.
the
the results of a second run
160°K are plotted
T, = Tirr =
Also
int,o Fig. 7.
Finally, in order to demonstrate
the good reproducibility,
.
160°K
of the discussed
Also here a variation with strain amplitude
01 .
without
T,,= Tirr =
that this depth varies very
values forpl,
but less pronounced.
PA
one obtains
Since the distance between the depth
with the applied
corresponding
lo-
strain
pA(&) and P,,(F)
the apparent pinning point numbers gives Fig. 5 where
1 10’5
&
with these values.
such quantities
by formal application
and (2). An example
“41
Cu
an easy comparison
to permit
also in the following
4 [el/cm2]
T,,,=T,u=l60 K E =t5MeV
ELECTROS-IRRADIATED
T, = 78°K Tirr is raised
increase
differs
but there is no de-
In the case of fixed irradiation 160°K
Tirr =
(0,
0)
however,
both
p, and P_,~decrease, when the measuring temperature is raised from 78 to 160°K (0 ---f 0).
This decrease
is much larger for p, than for p,.
It is most pronoun-
ced for large strain amplitudes
and nearly vanishes
at small amplitudes.
’
10 Amplitude
’
2
.
g
4
*
6
*
8
’
10
I 10’
Fm. ‘7. The pinning point numbers pa from damping measurements (left part) and JJ~ from modulus measurements (right part) vs. strain amplitude for different combinations of T, and Tirr after a dose of Cp = 6 x 10’3 el/cmz.
ACTA
242
METALLURGICA,
E = 1.5MeV T,,,=T,=78 K
/To=
200
cl15c
alot
annealed
2
4 Strain
for 5 minutes at each T,
6
21,
1973 4. DISCUSSION
$I= 5.10’3 $*
PM
VOL.
8
10
Amplitude I 10’
8. pa VS. strain amplitude for a sample stepwise annealed after irradiation (5 min. per step). Electron dose CD= 5 x 1Or3 el/cms, T, = Z’I,, = 78°K.
FIG.
The effect of an isochronal annealing subsequent to the irradiation is shown in Fig. 8 for T, = Tirr = 78’K. With increasing annealing temperature TA the amount of additional pinning increases*. The particularly strong increase near TA = 200°K indicates the effect of a new recovery stage lying near this temperature”‘). The curves for TA = 160°K are also plotted in Fig. 7 (filled triangles). These curves agree rather well with the curves obtained directly by irradiation at 160°K and measuring at T, = 78°K (filled circles). In order to demonstrate the effect of the irradiation dose the curves p, and p,f vs. dose are plotted for T, = 78 and 160°K after Tirr = 160°K for a medium strain amplitude E = 4 x lo-’ (Fig. 9). The curves show that for high doses all the p-values converge to a single one. For low doses, however, just where the initial pinning rate is determined, the differences between values obtained at different temperatures of measurement or from either damping or modulus are rather large. At very small strain amplitudes (c.f. Fig. 3, upper part) these differences are considerably smaller. * This behaviour differs from that observed by Keefer’lg) who found that after Tfrr = 78°K an snneal at !!‘A = 150°K leads to an increase of px for T, = 4.2”K but to a decrease for T, = 78°K. Since Keefer worked at very large amplitudes (> 1O-B), it is suspected that this again is an effect of strain amplitude.
The most important result of the present paper is the reconfirmation of the earlier preliminary observation of the authors(g) that the so-called pinning rate minimum at 160°K is only connected with the temperature T, of measurement and not with the temperature Tirr of irradiation. As to be seen in Fig. 7. even an increase of both p and p,, is found if Tirr is raised from i8 to 160°K but T, is kept constant, (78°K). Such an increase ofp, with Tirr is the behaviour generally expect,ed because of the increasing mobility of the migrating point. defects. Also the effect of the annealing at 160°K after irradiation at 78°K by which nearly the same p-values are reached as by irradiat,ion directly at 160°K (Fig. 7) indicates, that there is no anomaly in point defect production or migration near 160’K. Only if at constant Tirr(160°K) T, is changed from 78 to 160°K a decrease in p is found (full and empty circles in Fig. 7). Moreover, this T,-dependence of p, i.e. the depth of the minimum, decreases strongly with decreasing st,rain amplitude E and reaches very small values at the smallest used amplitude of 1 k IO-‘. It cannot be decided, whether at still smaller amplitudes (in the true amplitude independent region) the minimum would disappear completely; but it can be concluded that in the present measurements the minimum is caused, at least to a large extent, by a strain amplitude dependent damping mechanism. Such mechanism must also be assumed for the work o_
iz..
I
10’3
10” Electrons
lo5 per cm’
FIG. 9. The pinning point numbers PA and pa vs. electron dose for T, = 78°K and T, = 160’K. The strain amplitude is E = 4 x IO-’ and TI,, = 160“K.
LUCKE
et al.:
DAMPING
AND
MODULUS
OF ELECTRON-IRRADIATED
damping
@:
haviour
5 010’~ cl/cm*
o Ti,=l60 K T,,, -160K
P
difference
the ratio phf/p, as obtained
Fig. 7 is plotted that
This
Ti,,. In
One recognizes
temperature
For small amplitudes
one
of the irradiat,ion
case of measuring
160”K, however, p,/p,
78°K
T, =
has ~,,~/p~ < 1 and independent
T, =
be-
in Fig. 10.
from the data of
vs. strain amplitude.
for the measuring
temperature
in the
and p, is also demonstrated
of p,
There,
10 -
measurements.
243
Cu
temperature
> 1 is generally
the two curves
found.
approach
each
other at a value only little below one. of p,/pA
In Fig. 11 the dose dependence
oL___l 0
according
of 4 x 10-7). Again, for T, = 78°K values p,,Jp, < 1 and for T, = 160°K values p,/p, > 1 are found.
10
5 Slrain
Amplilude
a 10’
> 10-s. amplitude
and
Buckc2)
did not report
used in that particular
The meaning
can best
at 78’K than the curves at larger however
(cf. Fig.
5), this
be recog-
T. After
irradiation,
dependence
st,rongly reduced so that then the 78”K-curve a steepness means
damping
that
due to irradiation
ent pinning
rate
Thus the increase
“minimum”
at
very strong
strain
T, =
sample
with
78”K,
which is not yet known.
of
the appar-
increasing
strain
reflects
mainly the
dependence
of the un-
the
physical
In contrast,
9 by going from the ‘Lminimum” temperatures
reduction
reason
of
the increase
in
at 160°K
is caused by a true increase
in pinning.
temperature. 7 also shows that the quantities
much less with strain agreement
amplitude
with the earlier
amplitude then
again
a strong
dependence
independent
the dislocation
irradiation
in both cases only the
damping resonance
or large
significant
T,
remains. theory
Since only
is valid, rates,
doses from
meaning
at the present Several p,
Whether
the
values at small ampli-
the value
of one have
or are only accidental
still not small enough
only
so that
close to one
are obtained.
of the p,/p,
small deviations tudes
of
which
has the same effect
only in these t,wo limit cases pi,/p,-values and independent
can
Since the strong
and pA give the true pinning
then p,
a value
This behaviour
from one are due to the ampli-
damping,
as going to small amplitudes:
amplitudes
cannot
than p,.
findings
P,,~ change
be decided
other
proposals
to interpret
appears satisfactory
differences
in the present case : (i) It has been
.
10
firr.160 c m’78
K K
I
aI aQ 1
This is in
* Similarly, the decrease of p with E for T, = 2’1~~= 16O’K (Fig. 7) indicates only that the curve obtained after irradiation approaches at large strain amplitudes the curve before irradiation.
0.1
10”
in
but none of them
of the authors’g)
that the minimum derived from modulus measurements is less pronounced than that derived from
a
or due to
state of investigat,ions.
and p, are given in literature,
to higher
It is due to the increase of the mobile fraction of irradiation induced point defects with increasing Figure
approach
in $J by going from the
160 to 78’K
amplitude at
the
e.g. to
(cf. Fig. 6).
and, therefore,
~5 increases
amplitude*.
irradiated
16O’K
T, = Tirr = for T, = 78°K
is
exhibits
similar to that of the other curves,
that of the curve for This
the
runs much steeper
amplitude
of pJpa
reduces this amplitude
It is to be seen (cf. Fig. 4) that
the A vs. E-curve before irradiation
below one.
deviations
set of measurements.
of the minimum
nized from Figs. 4-6.
curves
equal to or somewhat
tude dependent
et al.@), since they used strain amplitudes
Thompson
For high doses both
be reduced to that shown in Fig. 10.
FIG. 10. The ratios par/p&vs. strain amplitude as derived from Fig. 7 (T, = Firr = 160°K and T, = 78”K, !Z’i,, = 160’K) and Fig. 5 (T, = Tirr = 78’K). @ = 5 x 1Ol3cl/cm*.
of Simpson
is plotted
to the data of Fig. 9 (i.e. for an amplitude
10’4
10’5
Eleclrons per cm2 Fro. 11. The ratios px/p* 8~ derived from Fig. 9 vs. electron dose. Strain amphtude E = 4 x IO-‘, Ti,, = 160PK, T, = 78’K and 160°K.
244
_-ICTA METALLURGICA,
VOL.
21,
1973
0
l CO+
E not reported Thompson,BucklZi
= ’ MeV- t Bremstr 4 OS NV-e4 a5 t.ieV-ev 1.5 MN-eT 1.5 MN-e0 3.0 r&V-e-
20
40 Mean
FIU. 12. The pinning rate ratios 1; (lGO’K)/$
Transferred
not reported Roth et o1./9/ ~=l+lO-’ c:L~lo” present authors E=l .lO-’ ~=4.10-’ ~=1.5~1O~~Rolhet al.181
60 Energy [eV]
(78°K) measured by different, authors vs. kansferred energy?(Q) during irradiation.
statedf3) that such a difference occurs if the pinning is due to point defects migrating in only one dimension, i.e. in t’he case of crowdions. As will be shown in Appendix 1, it is felt that this is not correct and that also in this case p’a and p, should come out to be equal. (ii) As pointed out by several authorsf20-22) equations (1) and (2) used for calculating pa and p, are only first approximations neglecting the higher modes of dislocation vibration. It is shown in Appendix 2 that a calculation considering also higher order terms leads to values pM # p,, but that in the kHz-region this effect is very small and far below the accuracy of measurement. (iii) The existence of two dislocation components has been proposed as a reason for a disagreement of the p-values.c2) But also this interpretation leads to difficulties as will be shown at another place.(23) Finally, the question whether or not the mean energy (Q) transferred to the primary knock-on has an influence on the depth of the observed minimum shall be checked. In Fig. 12 the ratios of the $avalues found at 160 and 78°K (T, = T,,,) for all existing measurements are plotted vs. (Q). It can clearly be seen that there is no systematic energydependence, but again a great influence of the strain amplitude used in the experiments. For the lowest amplitudes (open symbols) a ratio near one is obtained. Summarizing the results of this investigation it can be stated that the so-called pinning rate minimum at 160°K has been found here too, but only as function of the temperature of measurement T, and not, as implicitly assumed by Thompson and Buck(2) and Seegerc3), as function of the temperature of irradiation Tirr.Furthermore, its depth has been found to strongly decrease with decreasing strain amplitude. This means this minimum indicates the occurrence of a temperature-denendent and stronnlv strain amnlitude-de-
pendent damping mechanism, but is not related to a temperature-dependence of the arrival rate of point. defect,s at the dislocations. Thus, in particular, no argument in favour of the assumption of thermal conversion of the crowdion can be derived from this minimum. Quite in the contrary, the very normal behaviour of the pinning rate near Tirr= 160°K (at constant temperature of measurement) favours the conclusion that no new process starts to occur in this temperature range. This conclusion is in agreement with the conclusion of Schilling et al.(s) who found that the model of the thermal conversion of the crowdion is in contradiction with the results of their resistivity measurements. REFERENCES 1. A. GRANATO and K. LOCKE. Phusicat Acoustica. Vol. 4. Part A, edited by W. P. MASON. “Academic Pres$ (1966): 2. D. 0. THOMPSON and 0. BUCK, Phqs. Status Solidi 37,
53 (1970). 3. A. SEEGER, Phys. Status Solidi 88, 235 (1970). 4. W. FRANK and A. SEEGER, Radiation Effect8 1,117 (1969). 5. W. SCHILLINQ, K. SCHR~DER and H. WOLLENBERCER, Phys. Status Solidi 38, 245 (1970). 6. H. M. SIMPSON, A. SOSIN and S. L. SEIFFERT, J. appl. Phys. 42, 3977 (1971). 7. H. M. SIMPSON and A. SOSIN, Radiation Effects 2, 299 (1970). 8. G. ROTH, G. SOKOLOWSKI and K. LOCKE, Phys. Stab Solidi 40, K77 (1970). 9. G. ROTH, G. SOKOLOWSKI and K. L~~cKE, J. Phys. 32, C2-145 (1971). 10. D. 0. THOMPSON and F. M. GLASS, Rev. Scient. In&rum. 29, 1034 (1958). 11. G. ROTH and K. F. RITTINIXIAUS, 2. ange2u. Phys. 32,331 (1972). 12. A. SOSIN, Acta Met. 10, 390 (1962). 13. D. KBNIG, J. V~LKL and W. SCHILLINO, Phya. St&w, Solidi 7, 591 (1964). 14. R. KAMEL and K. Z. BOTROS: Phys. Statue Solidi 12, 399 (1965). 15. J. A. DI CARLO and J. R. TOWNSEND, Acta Met. 14, 1716 (1966). 16. G. ROTH and V. NAUNDORF, Radiation Effect8 2, 187 (1970). 17. V. NAUNDORF, G. ROTH and K. LOCKE, Crystal Lattice Defecta 2, 205 (1971). 18. S. TIMOSHENKO and J. N. GOODIER, Theory of Ek&city. McGraw-Hill (1951).
Lt’CKE
et al.:
DAMPIR’G
AND
NODULL-S
19. D. IV. REEFER. Actn Met. 17. 611 (1969). 20. A. GRANATO, Thesis, Brown bniversity iIS%). 21. D. HOL.MES, Oak Ridge Report, personal communication. 22. W. HORNCSG, person&l co&n&ation. 23. G. ROTH, G. SOKOLOWSKI and Ii. LOCKE, To be published. 24. A. GRANATO and K. LCXE, J. a&. Phys. 27,583 (1956).
Seegert3) calculated the fraction
annihilated
By expanding
,u~(Z) of crowdions
instead
during their motion.
to Ref.
A = li, f AM/M
for pro-
of pinning
time tirr is given b!
s
if tirr is large compared
to the time needed
crowdion
to
equations
(1) and (2) these pinning
following
reach
relative
the
dislocation.
. L2 . [l + 0.9868 . g . L? T 0.9856
= K,,
u’} * L4]
g = LOO.Alr2.C a2 = Co2. K,
by the
According
to
K,
points cause the
changes of damping
0.9986u~) . L4
and modulus:
. C2
~7~4
= 1.0014.8.b2.A.G.
B.w/T~.C’
= 1.0147 * 8 . b” . A . G/n4 . C
A the mass per unit length, B the damping C the line tension, A the density
AtlAo= (1 + P(tin-))-4 =
By inserting the values A = lo-l4 g/cm,
than that with a2 so that
least two orders of magnitude the equations
P(tirr))-2
AM/M in Ref. (3) equations
AtlAo=
s 0
(AM/M),
reduce to
inating
[1 +
from
different
ever, has no physical
P,,
p,/p,
the pinning points orig1 would
and modulus.
meaning.
In reality,
contribute
With
This, how-
4
damping
and modulus are only able to see the total number of pinning points so that no difference pa can be derived in this way.
between p,
=
-
1
[(AM/Wo/(A~/W,l”*
- 1
one obtains for p < 1
IV1+ Y . tirr - .P~m(~)l~ distances
0.9856 - cl2 * P]
1
p, sz (A0/A,)“4
K&l4 and
to decrement
- L2 * [l -
p = L,/L -
P(Z) . dl
to these equations
independently
Y - tirr *
= K,
0.9986 - u2 - LJ]
Ritjh the notations
P(Z) . dl
lm,
(AM/M), = s o According
are
to
Imax
B = 10-a
nizes that the terms with g and g2 are smaller by at
A = K, . L4. [l -
used corresponding
and
dyn sec/cm2, C = low5 dyn, L, = 10W4cm one recog(3)
Inst’ead of these expressions,
constant,
of dislocations,
G the shear modulus.
[l + y.tirrl”“‘ ,uu,(l) .p(i).d;l-4
WfIW, = t1 + (AM/M),
and using in-
Here is
max pm(Z) . P(2) . dl
0
(2.9958 . g’ -
. (g2 -
1
p(ti,,) = y . tirr
of
* L4 . [l T l.9975gLz
of being otherwise
(3) the number
points p(t) after an irradiation
distribution
loops into a power series
obtains
ducing such defect in a distance between 1 and 1 + dl. according
for a delta function
the length of the dislocation
y is the production
rate of crowdions ‘and P(Z) dl the probability Then
the exact expressions of the Granato-
Liicke theory’%)
at a distance 1 from the dislocation
and reach the dislocation
of higher mode3
st,ead of only the first term the first three terms, one
by crowdions
which are produced
2. Consideration
245
Cu
with respect to the angular frequency
APPENDIX
1. Pinning
OF ELECTROS-IRRADIATED
and
x
for
= 1 + 0.9726 * a2 * Lo4(1 + p)
the values lo-’ o/2n
for
given
0/2x
= 10’ Hz.
region the correction of measurement. of observable
above
= 104 Hz This
one obtains
a2L,4 =
and a2L,4 = 4 x 10-I
means
that
in the kHz
term is far below the accuracy
Only for the MHz-region
magnitude
can be expected.
deviations