Influence of various uropathogens on crystallization of urine mineral components caused by Proteus mirabilis

Influence of various uropathogens on crystallization of urine mineral components caused by Proteus mirabilis

Accepted Manuscript Influence of various uropathogens on crystallization of urine mineral components caused by Proteus mirabilis Agnieszka Torzewska, ...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 38 Views

Accepted Manuscript Influence of various uropathogens on crystallization of urine mineral components caused by Proteus mirabilis Agnieszka Torzewska, Katarzyna Bednarska, Antoni Różalski PII:

S0923-2508(18)30179-7

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2018.11.005

Reference:

RESMIC 3702

To appear in:

Research in Microbiology

Received Date: 27 July 2018 Revised Date:

19 November 2018

Accepted Date: 26 November 2018

Please cite this article as: A. Torzewska, K. Bednarska, A. Różalski, Influence of various uropathogens on crystallization of urine mineral components caused by Proteus mirabilis, Research in Microbiologoy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2018.11.005. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Title:

2

Influence of various uropathogens on crystallization of urine mineral components caused by

3

Proteus mirabilis Authors: Agnieszka Torzewskaa*, Katarzyna Bednarskaa, Antoni Różalskia

5

a

6

University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland

RI PT

4

SC

Department of Biology of Bacteria, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection ,

M AN U

7

8

9

11

TE D

10

E-mail:

13

Correspondence and reprints - [email protected] ( Agnieszka Torzewska)

14

[email protected] (Katarzyna Bednarska)

15

[email protected] (Antoni Różalski)

AC C

16

EP

12

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 17

Abstract

18

Infectious urolithiasis is a consequence of long-standing urinary tract infections with urease-

20

positive bacteria, especially Proteus spp. However, because of the often mixed nature of

21

urinary tract infections, in the case of urinary stones formation, several species of bacteria

22

may be involved in the process. The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of the

23

bacterial species: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Providencia stuartii,

24

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus on the crystallization caused by

25

Proteus mirabilis. The studies were conducted in synthetic urine with the addition of P.

26

mirabilis and a representative of another species. During the experiments the viability of

27

bacteria, pH, presence and morphology of crystals, and the intensity of crystallization were

28

assessed. Crystallization of calcium and magnesium phosphates occurred in all investigated

29

configurations. However, there were differences observed in the course and intensity of

30

crystallization between the mixed culture and the P. mirabilis culture. Although most intense

31

crystallization took place in the pure culture of P. mirabilis it was also demonstrated that the

32

presence of other uropathogens increased the survival of P. mirabilis. This synergistic effect

33

could be responsible for the persistence and recurrence of urolithiasis in the urinary tract.

34

Key words: uropathogen, Proteus mirabilis, multibacterial infection, urinary tract infection,

35

urolithiasis

36

37

38

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

19

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 39

1. Introduction Urolithiasis is a multifactorial disease resulting from metabolic disorders, poor diet, obesity,

41

incorrect concentration of crystallization inhibitors and promoters in urine or bacterial

42

infection. Almost 10% of the human population suffers from this disease [1]. Urinary stones

43

formed as a result of urinary tract infection caused by urease-producing bacteria account for

44

about 10-15 % of all urinary calculi [2]. This urolithiasis is distinguished by rapid growth of a

45

stone (4–6 weeks are enough to form a stone), persistence and high rate, up to 50% of

46

recurrence, even with proper treatment [3]. Proteus mirabilis is the species that most

47

commonly causes the development of infectious urolithiasis. Precipitation and crystallization

48

of the urine components are caused by urease of these bacteria. An increase in urinary pH and

49

the reactions occurring as a result of urea hydrolysis cause a rise in the concentrations of ions:

50

NH4+, PO43-, CO32-, which, in the presence of calcium and magnesium even in normal

51

concentrations, leads to the precipitation of phosphate salt and promotes crystallization of

52

struvite (MgNH4PO4 x 6 H2O) and carbonate apatite (Ca10(PO4)6CO3) [4, 5]. In the further

53

steps of urinary stones formation the crystals aggregate and are retained in the urinary tract. In

54

these stages bacterial extracellular polysaccharides and microorganism macromolecules such

55

as glycosaminoglycans are involved [2, 6]. Moreover, P. mirabilis bacteria, which are able to

56

survive in the cells of the urinary tract and to avoid antimicrobial factors and mechanisms of

57

the host immune system [7], cause the formation of microcrystals inside the urothelial cells

58

[7, 8]. Intracellular crystals grow in isolated conditions, can reach the size that allows further

59

mineral salt deposition, attachment of other crystals and macromolecules derived from the

60

host and bacteria, and form a stone. In addition, intracellular bacteria are a source of recurrent

61

infections. These two phenomena are likely to be responsible for the recurrence and

62

persistence of infectious urolithiasis caused by Proteus bacilli [8].

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

40

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 63

Pathogenesis of urinary stones formation as a result of P.mirabilis infection is well understood but there is still little information about the participation of other microorganisms

65

in the development of P.mirabilis- induced urolithiasis. Clinical studies have shown that it is

66

rarely the case that only one species of microorganisms is isolated from urinary calculi.

67

Besides P.mirabilis the bacteria most commonly isolated from urinary stones are Escherichia

68

coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [9, 10, 11]. P. mirabilis is most

69

frequently isolated from struvite stones, while E. coli and K. pneumoniae are more often

70

found in calculi built of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate [ 9,11]. How urease-negative

71

bacteria contribute to urinary stone formation has still not been explained. It is also worth

72

emphasizing that urinary tract infections can be polymicrobial infections, which are

73

frequently caused by several microorganisms simultaneously. This occurs particularly in

74

people with a weakened immune system or in long-term catheterized patients [12]. In these

75

cases, P. mirabilis is a common cause of both complicated UTI (12%) and catheter-associated

76

bacteriuria in long-term catheterized patients (15%) [13, 14]. In such situations it can be

77

assumed that both infection and urinary stones formation may be accompanied by the

78

occurrence of synergistic interactions. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to determine

79

the impact of the most common uropathogens on crystallization caused by P. mirabilis.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

64

2. Material and Methods

81

2.1.

AC C

80

Bacterial strains

82

Uropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis,

83

Providencia stuartii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were used in the

84

study. All bacteria were obtained from encrusted biofilm formed on Foley’s urinary catheters

85

of long-term catheterized patients (from several months to several years) and were deposited

86

in the bacterial strains collection at the Department of Biology of Bacteria, the University of

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Lodz. Method of isolation of bacteria and their identification has been already described

88

earlier by Moryl et al. [15]. Strains selected for this research came from catheters with surface

89

visibly encrusted with mineral salts. Before the experiment, the bacteria were cultured on

90

tryptic soy broth (TSB, BTL, Łódź, Poland) for 18 h at 37 °C. These cultures were mixed

91

with synthetic urine to achieve a bacterial suspension with a density 1x 106 CFU mL-1 (colony

92

forming units per milliliter). In practice, this meant at least a 1000-fold dilution of the culture

93

in synthetic urine. The number of bacteria was checked spectrophotometrically at 550 nm

94

(Ultrospec2000, Pharmacia Biotech, Vienna , Austria) using a standard curve of a directly

95

proportional relationship between the absorbance (A 550) and the number of bacteria in the

96

suspension.

97

2.2.

Synthetic urine

M AN U

SC

RI PT

87

Synthetic urine was prepared using the modified method previously described by Griffith et

99

al. [16] which is now widely used in in vitro studies of uropathogens [17]. The solution

TE D

98

consisted of the following components (g L-1): urea, 25.0; NaCl, 4.6; KH2PO4, 2.8; Na2SO4,

101

2.3; KCl, 1.6; NH4Cl, 1.0; creatinine, 1.1; CaCl2 × 2H2O, 0.651; MgCl2 × 6H2O, 0.651;

102

sodium citrate, 0.65; sodium oxalate, 0.02; and tryptic soy broth, 10.0 (Sigma-Aldrich,

103

Poznan, Poland). Synthetic urine composition corresponds to the mean concentration of the

104

mineral components found during a 24-hour period in normal human urine. Prior to the

105

experiment, pH was adjusted to 5.8 and the synthetic urine was sterilized by passing through a

106

0.2 µm pore-size filter.

107

AC C

EP

100

2.3.

Analysis of urease activity

108

Urease activity was determined using the phenol hypochlorite ammonia determination assay

109

[18]. One unit of urease activity was defined as µg NH3 produced per 1 min, and expressed as

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT units per mg of total bacterial protein (U/mg). First, 1 ml of bacterial culture (TSB medium,

111

37°C, 24 h) was centrifuged (8000g/5min), suspended in 1 ml of synthetic urine and

112

incubated for 15 min at 37°C. Then 10 µl of bacterial suspension in synthetic urine was mixed

113

with 150 µl phenol sodium nitroprusside solution (1 % w/v phenol, 0.05 % w/v sodium

114

nitroprusside) and 150 µl sodium hypochlorite solution (0.5 % w/v sodium hydroxide, 0.5 %

115

w/v sodium hypochlorite) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The absorbance value which was

116

measured at 625 nm with a Multiskan Ex (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland), using all reagents

117

without bacteria as a negative control (blank) was compared to that given by standard

118

solutions of ammonium sulphate. Bacterial suspension remaining in synthetic urine was

119

centrifuged (8000g/5min), after that 2M NaOH was added to the pellet and incubated

120

overnight at 37°C to lyse bacterial cells. The amount of protein was measured by the Lowry

121

method [19]. In addition, the urease activity of all bacterial strains was detected on the

122

Christensen’s urea medium.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

110

2.4.

Crystallization experiment

124

2.4.1. Determination of the effect of other bacteria on crystallization caused by P.

EP

123

mirabilis

125

The differences in crystallization intensity were determined in mixed bacterial cultures in 20

127

ml of synthetic urine in a 50 ml tube with conical bottom after 24 h of incubation at 37°C

128

without stirring. Suspensions of bacteria were prepared as described above. In each

129

experiment another bacterial species (E.coli, K. pneumoniae, P. stuartii, P. aeruginosa, S.

130

aureus) were added to the P. mirabilis suspension, each at a concentration of 1x106 CFU mL-

131

1

132

number of bacteria were assessed. Crystallization intensity was determined by chemical

133

analysis and direct phase-contrast microscopy. A pure culture of P. mirabilis was used as a

AC C

126

. After 5 h , and 24 h incubation periods, the pH, the intensity of crystallization and the

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT reference system. Crystals observation was performed using an inverted microscope Nikon

135

Eclipse S2000 with software enabling image analysis. For chemical analyses, 1 ml of each

136

sample containing urine with bacteria and crystals was collected, centrifuged (8000g/5min)

137

and treated for mineralization with HNO3 (65%, POCh, Gliwice, Poland) for 60 min at 100

138

°C. The phosphate concentration was measured by the colorimetric method based on the

139

reduction of phosphomolybdic acid [20] and atomic absorption spectroscopy (SpectrAA-300

140

Varian, Palo Alto, California ) was used to determine calcium and magnesium concentrations.

141

To determine the number of bacteria in pure and mixed cultures, the suspensions were serially

142

diluted in saline solution. In the case of mixed cultures of E.coli, K.pneumoniae, P.mirabilis

143

and P.stuartii aliquots of 100 µl were spread on McConkey medium. For mixed cultures of

144

P.mirabilis with S.aureus diluted suspensions were spread both on McConkey (P. mirabilis

145

growth) and TSB agar (P.mirabilis and S.aureus growth) and for P.mirabilis with

146

P.aeruginosa McConkey (P.mirabilis growth) and Cetrimide agar (P. aeruginosa growth)

147

were used. After overnight incubation at 37°C, colonies on the plates were counted to

148

determine the number of CFU mL-1 (colony forming units per milliliter). In mixed cultures,

149

the ability to grow, breakdown of lactose and different colony morphology were taken into

150

account to determine the number of bacteria of individual species.

151

Statistics

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

134

152

The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of five to seven independent

153

experiments. Statistical analyses were based on the Mann-Whitney U test the Anova Kruskal-

154

Wallis test and performed using Statistica software version 12 pl (StatSoft ,Poland). The

155

results were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05. Statistical differences

156

between groups are indicated in the text.

157

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 158

3. Results

159

3.1.

Viability of bacteria in pure and mixed cultures

At the beginning of each experiment, the suspension in the synthetic urine had a density of 0.8

161

to 1.2 x 106 CFU mL-1 for each bacteria. As shown in Fig. 1, the number of all tested bacteria

162

during incubation increased significantly at 5 h reaching a value of 107 CFU mL-1 with the

163

exception of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus of which growth was 10-

164

times weaker at that time. After 24 h, probably due to the high pH of the synthetic urine, the

165

growth of the bacteria was inhibited. In the case of Proteus mirabilis, the number of bacteria

166

reached a value 39.5 ± 19.8 x 106 CFU mL-1, after 5 h of incubation in synthetic urine, but at

167

24 h their viability drastically decreased, even 100-fold. When comparing the number of

168

P.mirabilis cells in the pure culture to that of the number of bacteria in the mixed cultures, it

169

can be seen that during the shorter incubation (5 h) the presence of other bacteria did not

170

affect P. mirabilis growth (p > 0.05), whereas after 24 h, in all mixed cultures, the number of

171

P. mirabilis bacilli was much higher than in the pure culture of this microorganism (p ≤

172

0.001). The highest number of P.mirabilis cells was observed in co-cultured infection with

173

Escherichia coli. The numbers of cells of the other species that were co-cultured with P.

174

mirabilis ranged between 45.2 – 2.9 x 106 CFU mL-1 after 5 h of incubation, whereas at 24h

175

the presence of live bacteria was detected only in the case of Providencia stuartii, P.

176

aeruginosa and S. aureus (0.2 – 12 x 106 CFU mL-1). In the presence of E. coli and K.

177

pneumoniae no growth was observed after this time, which might have been caused by the

178

higher sensitivity of these bacteria at high pH.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

160

179

180

Changes in urine pH due to the activity of bacterial urease

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT During the growth of urease-positive bacteria in urine the pH increases over time. As shown

182

in Table 1, apart from P.mirabilis, two of tested strains exhibited urease activity i.e.

183

Klebsiella pneumoniae and Providencia stuartii. The activity of this enzyme was highest in P.

184

mirabilis (189 U/mg). While analyzing pH changes in the prepared cultures, it was found that

185

in all tested samples of both mixed and pure P. mirabilis cultures the pH was increased (Table

186

2). After 5h the pH values varied from 7.29 to 7.90. The highest pH was found when P.

187

mirabilis was present together with P. stuartii. After 24 h of culture in all tests the pH values

188

were very similar (9.48 - 9.57).

189

Bacterial effect on the crystallization in synthetic urine

190

As mentioned above, crystallization of mineral compounds in urine is provoked by an

191

increase in the pH caused by bacterial urease. In the experiments, crystallization was induced

192

by P. mirabilis bacteria. Chemically, the resulting crystals were found to be calcium and

193

magnesium phosphates, and therefore in the performed experiments, the degree of

194

crystallization was measured by the presence and amount of the Mg, Ca and phosphate ions.

195

The reference point for these results was the calcium (1.86 ± 0.23 µg mL-1) and magnesium

196

(1.31 ± 0.26 µg mL-1) content in a urine sample containing bacteria measured at 0 h. As

197

shown in Figure. 2, for almost all tested samples, both after 5 and 24 hours of incubation, the

198

amounts of ions were statistically significantly different from the reference (p ≤ 0.001), which

199

indicated that crystallization had occurred. The initial crystallization (after 5h) is

200

characterized by a higher content of calcium phosphate (apatite) than magnesium phosphate

201

(struvite). In the sample containing P. mirabilis and S. aureus, at that point struvite (p=0.77,

202

compared with reference point – 0 h) had not been crystallized yet. After 24h the differences

203

between the amounts of calcium and magnesium were much smaller. At the beginning of the

204

experiment, after 5 hours, crystallization was most intense when P. mirabilis alone was

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

181

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT present in a culture. In the case of mixed cultures, only in the presence of P. stuartii and E.

206

coli together with P. mirabilis the amounts of tested ions were clearly higher than in the

207

control, while in the other samples the levels of ions were slightly different from the amount

208

present in the control. In the presence of S. aureus, crystallization occurred particularly late.

209

Similarly to the situation observed at 5h, after 24 h the amount of crystallized minerals in the

210

P. mirabilis monoculture was higher than in the case of co-culture with other bacteria but this

211

difference in each case, as indicated in Fig. 2, was not statistically significant. In particular,

212

when P. mirabilis was accompanied by E. coli, the level of calcium and magnesium

213

phosphate precipitates was equal to their amount in the pure culture (p > 0.05).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

205

During the whole experiment crystallization was also evaluated by observing the

215

suspension under the phase contrast microscope. The time of the appearance of the first

216

crystals, their size and morphology provide important information about the crystallization

217

rate. It is known that precipitates of apatite (for example, carbonate apatite) appear as the first

218

when the pH rises above 6.5 and that crystals of struvite are formed later when the pH rises

219

above 7.2 [2]. These minerals have a distinctive appearance. Fig. 3 shows amorphous apatite

220

and “coffin-like” crystals of struvite. After 5h only apatite was visible in all samples, with the

221

largest amounts of the precipitates in the pure culture of P. mirabilis and co-culture of P.

222

mirabilis with P. aeruginosa. At the end of the experiment (after 24h) the pH increased above

223

9.0 and, apart from apatite, struvite crystals were also visible. The size and morphology of

224

these crystals were varied. The smallest crystals of struvite were found in the culture of P.

225

mirabilis with P. aeruginosa (17-24 µm), while the largest ones, exceeding 80 µm, were

226

present in the urine infected with P. mirabilis alone. In most of the samples, the crystals were

227

present in both coffin-like and dendritic form, with the exception of the culture of P. mirabilis

228

with P. aeruginosa containing no dendrites, which may indicate decelerated crystallization.

AC C

EP

TE D

214

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 229

230

4. Discussion The formation of urinary stones as a result of infection by bacteria of the genus Proteus is a

232

well-recognized phenomenon [5, 3]. However, most of the studies have been conducted on

233

pure cultures of P. mirabilis, which does not fully reflect conditions that occur during urinary

234

tract infections and complications such as urinary stone formation. Urinary tract infections are

235

often polymicrobial and in such conditions interactions between microorganisms may

236

influence the process of urinary stones formation. Polymicrobial urinary tract infections are

237

most commonly associated with long-term urinary catheterization. Moryl et al [15] studying

238

the distribution of Proteus mirabilis in multi-species biofilms on 88 urinary catheters showed

239

that P. mirabilis accounted for about 18% of the bacteria isolated from the catheters and was

240

often accompanied by such bacteria as: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Providencia stuartii,

241

Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Morganella morganii and Enterococcus faecalis.

242

Such a composition of mixed biofilms on urological catheters has also been confirmed by

243

other studies [21, 22, 23]. Due to the fact that the same microorganisms are simultaneously

244

isolated from urinary stones, strains isolated from encrusted catheters were used in the present

245

study. In mixed culture or polymicrobial infection, microorganisms can compete for nutrients

246

or provide them to each other, promote or inhibit colonization (adhesion, invasion), acquire

247

new features by transfer of genetic information, or eliminate each other by secretion of

248

antibacterial components [4]. These are dynamically changing interactions depending on the

249

composition of mixed culture of microorganisms. In mixed cultures both positive and

250

negative interactions between microorganisms have been observed. There are only a few

251

studies which show the interactions between microorganisms in the formation of urinary

252

stones [24,25,26]. On the basis of the results of the present study, it can be concluded that the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

231

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT highest intensity of mineral salts crystallization is noted when the urine is infected with P.

254

mirabilis alone. The presence of other microorganisms seems to be delaying the process of

255

crystallization and to inhibit its intensity. Previously, Armbruster et al [24] demonstrated in

256

studies on mice that a simultaneous colonization with P. mirabilis and P. stuartii enhances

257

the process of urinary stones formation. The effect of this interaction is explained by the

258

synergistic intensification of the urease activity of both uropathogens. In further studies using

259

the CAUTI mouse model these authors showed positive effects of other uropathogens such as

260

Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa on

261

the urease activity of P. mirabilis [25]. The activation mechanism is not yet known but seems

262

very important in the pathogenicity of Proteus mirabilis in polymicrobial infection.

263

Previously mentioned interactions between P. mirabilis and P. stuartii were not observed in

264

these studies. Although the pH was the highest at 5h of incubation in the presence of P.

265

mirabilis and P. stuartii , the level of crystallization, compared with the sample where P.

266

mirabilis was present alone, was lower and the crystals were smaller. The differences in the

267

results of these two studies may be due to different experimental models as well as the

268

properties of the tested strains, which may indicate strain-specific dependency. Besides P.

269

stuartii, another urease - positive uropathogen – K. pneumoniae was used in this study and in

270

this case, the presence of P. mirabilis together with another microorganism producing urease

271

did not intensify crystallization. It indicates that urease activity is required to induce the

272

crystallization process but the level of crystallized salts depends on other bacterial factors and

273

the environment of the macroorganism. Many authors have emphasized the role of

274

polysaccharides of bacteria in modulating the crystallization intensity during the formation of

275

infectious urinary stones [3, 27]. In accordance with their results, bacterial polysaccharides

276

that bind cations of calcium and magnesium can accelerate crystallization of struvite and

277

apatite. In the case of in vivo studies ,the presence of inhibitors and promoters of

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

253

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT crystallization (e.g. glycosaminoglycans, ) as well as various concentrations of ions (e.g.

279

magnesium, calcium) in the urine which are involved in crystallization are also significant [6,

280

28].

281

The effect of mixed cultures on the formation of infectious urinary stones may not be directly

282

related to the crystallization process but it can also be associated with different degree of

283

adaptation of bacteria to unfavorable growth environment such as urine. Urine has a low pH

284

and high concentration of urea which inhibits the growth of most bacteria. Bacteria can

285

hydrolyze urea (urease - positive e.g. P. mirabilis) and endure its adverse effects [3] or have

286

osmoadaptative systems, like accumulation of betaine inside cells, e.g. E. coli [29]. Bacteria

287

can also use urine components for a growth which is allowed by the metabolic pathways

288

characteristic for this environment [29]. The advantage is also given to microorganisms with

289

siderophores which allow them to obtain iron ions from the environment. In the case of

290

polymicrobial bacteriuria bacteria can mutually favor the growth of other bacteria or inhibit it.

291

In the presented results As shown in Fig. 1, both in pure and in mixed cultures the number of

292

bacteria decreased at 24 h of incubation due to the high pH. However in all cases, the number

293

of P. mirabilis bacteria was higher in mixed cultures, which indicates that in presence of

294

other uropathogens infections P. mirabilis has better conditions for growth and colonization

295

of the organism. It also seems probable that the ureolytic activity and the changing pH of the

296

growth environment can affect the number and type of species that are co-found in long-term

297

infections. In our research, in the case of P. mirabilis and E. coli co-culture infection, the

298

number of E. coli bacteria dropped to almost zero but the viability of P. mirabilis was not

299

altered compared to 5h. Previously, co-infections were studied in mouse experimental model

300

in the context of polymicrobial infections by Alteri et al. [26]. These authors have shown that

301

the co-infection of E. coli and P. mirabilis results in greater colonization of both

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

278

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT microorganisms in the urinary tract of mice. This effect is due to the metabolic properties of

303

both microorganisms consisting in the complementary use of carbon sources [30]. Contrary to

304

these findings, in our studies co-culture infection did not have a positive effect on E. coli .

305

This is probably due to the large accumulation of bacteria in the environment with elevated

306

pH, a high concentration of ammonia and an increasingly low carbon content. In vivo, such a

307

situation can occur in the biofilm on the urothelium or on the urinary catheters as well as in

308

the external or internal structure of the urinary stone.

SC

RI PT

302

Research is preliminary and requires continuation, especially for in vivo studies in

309

which the contribution of macroorganism’s factors will be taken into account. From a point of

311

view of the urinary stones formation it is particularly interesting to assess both the individual

312

differences in the composition of normal human urine, which cannot be demonstrated by

313

using synthetic urine and the involvement of immune system factors. However, the results

314

obtained clearly indicate that in the presence of other microorganisms the crystallization

315

caused by P. mirabilis is delayed and that P. mirabilis in such co-infections have a better

316

viability, which may affect the persistence of infectious urolithiasis and increase the duration

317

of treatment. It is not without importance to further analyze cell components of urease-

318

negative bacteria which influence the crystallization process during the formation of urinary

319

stones.

TE D

EP

AC C

320

M AN U

310

321

Declaration of interest

322

The authors report no conflicts of interest

323

324

Acknowledgments

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 325

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland (core

326

funding for statutory research activity, Grant 1132 - Department of Biology of Bacteria,

327

University of Lodz).

RI PT

328

References

330

[1] Knoll T. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and pathophysiology of urolithiasis. Eur Urol Suppl

331

2010;9 :802-806.

332

[2] Flannigan R, Choy WH, Chew B, Lange D. Renal struvite stones—pathogenesis,

333

microbiology, and management strategies. Nat Rev Urol 2014;11:331-341.

334

[3] McLean R J C, Nickel J C, Cheng K-J, Costerton JW. The ecology and pathogenicity of

335

urease-producing bacteria in the urinary tract. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 1988;16:37-79.

336

[4] Prywer J, Torzewska A. Bacterially induced struvite growth from synthetic urine:

337

experimental and theoretical characterization of crystal morphology. Cryst Growth Des 2009;

338

9: 3538–3543.

339

[5] Bichler KH, Eipper E, Naber K, Braun V, Zimmermann R, Lahme S. Urinary infection

340

stones. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2002; 19:488–498.

341

[6] Torzewska A, Różalski A. In vitro studies on the role of glycosaminoglycans in

342

crystallization intensity during infectious urinary stones formation. APMIS 2014;122(6):505-

343

11. doi: 10.1111/apm.12191.

344

[7] Mathoera RB, Kok DJ,1 Verduin CM, Nijman RJM. Pathological and therapeutic

345

significance of cellular invasion by Proteus mirabilis in an enterocystoplasty infection stone

346

model. Infect Immun 2002; 70: 7022–7032.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

329

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [8] Torzewska A, Budzyńska A, Białczak-Kokot M, Rozalski A. In vitro studies of

348

epithelium associated crystallization caused by uropathogens during urinary calculi

349

development. Microb Pathogenesis 2014; 71-72: 25-31.

350

[9] Tavichakorntrakool R, Prasongwattana V, Sungkeeree S, Saisud P, Sribenjalux P,

351

Pimratana C, et al. Extensive characterizations of bacteria isolated from catheterized urine and

352

stones matrices in patients with nephrolithiasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 4125-

353

4130.

354

[10] Lewi H J E., White A, Hutchinson G, Scott R. The bacteriology of the urine and renal

355

calculi. Urol Res 1984; 12: 107-109.

356

[11] Mufarrij PW, Lange JN, Assimos DG, Mirzazadeh M, Holmes RP. Multibacterial

357

growth from a surgical renal stone culture: a case report and literature review. Rev Urol

358

2012;14:108-114.

359

[12] Short F L, Murdoch S L, Ryan R P. Polybacterial human diseases: the ills of social

360

networking. Trends Microbiol 2014; 22:508-516.

361

[13] Jacobsen SM, Stickler DJ, Mobley HLT, Shirtliff ME. Complicated catheter-associated

362

urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Clin Microbiol Rev

363

2008;21:26–59.

364

[14] Tay W H, Chong K K L, Kline K A. Polymicrobial-host interactions during infection. J

365

Mol Biol 2016;428:3355-3371.

366

[15] Moryl M, Torzewska A, Jalmuzna P, Rozalski A. Analysis of Proteus mirabilis

367

distribution in multi-species biofilms on urinary catheters and determination of bacteria

368

resistance to antimicrobial agents. Pol J Microbiol 2013;62:377-384.

369

[16] Griffith D P, Musher D M, Itin C. Urease, the primary cause of infection-induced urinary

370

stones. Invest Urol 1976;13:346-350.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

347

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [17] Ipe DS, Ulett GC. Evaluation of the in vitro growth of urinary tract infection-causing

372

gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in a proposed synthetic human urine (SHU)

373

medium. J Microbiol Methods 2016;127:164-171.

374

[18] Weatherburn M W. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal

375

Chem 1967; 39: 971-3.

376

[19] Lowry JOH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the

377

Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 260-5.

378

[20] Ames BH, Dubin DT. The role of polyamines in the neutralization of bacteriophage

379

deoxiribonucleic acid. J Biol Chem 1960;235:769-775.

380

[21] MacLeod S M, Stickler D J. Species interactions in mixed-community crystalline

381

biofilms on urinary catheters. J Med Microbiol 2007;56:1549-1557.

382

[22] Ganderton L, Chawla J, Winters C, Wimpenny J, Stickler D. Scanning electron

383

microscopy of bacterial biofilms on indwelling bladder catheters. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect

384

Dis 1992;11:789-796.

385

[23] Armbruster C, Prenovost K, Mobley HLT, Mody L. How often do clinically diagnosed

386

catheter-associated urinary tract infections in nursing homes meet standardized criteria? J Am

387

Geriatr Soc 2017b;65:395–401.

388

[24] Armbruster CE,. Smith SN, Yep A, Mobley HTL. Increased incidence of urolithiasis and

389

bacteremia during Proteus mirabilis and Providencia stuartii coinfection due to synergistic

390

induction of urease activity. J Infect Dis 2013;26:1-9.

391

[25] Armbruster ChE, Smith SN, Johnson AO, DeOrnellas V, Eaton KA, Yep A, et al. The

392

pathogenic potential of Proteus mirabilis is enhanced by other uropathogens during

393

polymicrobial urinary tract infection. Infect Immun 2017a, 85, e:00808-16.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

371

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [26] Alteri ChJ, Himpsl SD, Mobley HLT. Preferential use of central metabolism in vivo

395

reveals a nutritional basis for polymicrobial infection. PLoS Pathog 2015;11(1): e1004601.

396

doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004601.

397

[27] Dumanski A J, Hedelin H, Edin-Liljegren A, Beauchemin D, McLean RJ. Unique ability

398

of the Proteus mirabilis capsule to enhance mineral growth in infectious urinary calculi.

399

Infect Immun 1994;62: 2998-3003.

400

[28] Ebisuno S, Komura T, Yamagiwa K. Urease-induced crystallizations of calcium

401

phosphate and magnesium ammonium phosphate in synthetic urine and human urine. Urol

402

Res 1997;25(4):263-7.

403

[29] Ipe DS, Horton E, Ulett . GC. The basic of bacteriuria: strategies of microbes for

404

persistence in urine. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2016;6: 14

405

[30] Norsworthy AN, Pearson MM. From catheter to kidney stone: the uropathogenic

406

lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis. Trends Microbiol 2017;25:304–315.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

394

407

Legends to figures

409

Fig.1 Bacterial viability in mixed and pure cultures during incubation in synthetic urine after:

410

A -5h, B-24h. The values represent means ± SD of 5-8 experiments. **- p < 0.05, *- p < 0.001

411

for P. mirabilis viability in mixed culture vs pure culture, U Mann- Whitney test Anova

412

Kruskal-Wallis test.

413

Fig.2 Intensity of crystallization induced by P.mirabilis after A – 5h, B- 24h of incubation.

414

The values represent means ± SD of 5-8 experiments. **- p < 0.05, *- p < 0.001 for comparison

415

of each ion concentration to control culture of P. mirabilis, U Mann- Whitney test Anova

416

Kruskal-Wallis test.

417

Fig.3 Amorphous apatite (A) and struvite crystals (S) in synthetic urine infected with: 1-

418

P.mirabilis, 2 – P.mirabilis + E.coli, 3- P.mirabilis + K.pneumoniae, 4 – P.mirabilis +

AC C

EP

408

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT P.stuartii, 5 – P.mirabilis + P.aeruginosa, 6 – P.mirabilis + S.aureus. a –each sample after

420

5h, b-after 24h of incubation. The scale bar represents 20 µm.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

419

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Differences in the ureolytic activity of the tested strains. Strain

Activity of urease Culture method* Colorimetric method [U/mg]** positive 189.9 ± 9.8 positive 39.9 ± 2.3 positive (after 48h) 24.9 ± 4.1 negative 5.0 ± 1.2 negative 4.1 ± 2.9 negative 3.6 ± 1.9

RI PT

Proteus mirabilis Providencia stuartii Klebsiella pneumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Escherichia coli Staphylococcus aureus

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

* Urease activity was detected on Christensen’s medium, **- urease activity was expressed as µg NH3 produced -1 -1 x 1 min x (mg total bacterial protein) by colorimetric methods see Materials and methods section, results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) of five experiments

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2.Changes in urinary pH induced by bacteria.

Sample

Time of incubation 5h 24h 7.57 ± 0.73 7.29 ± 0.29 7.43 ± 0.32 7.90 ± 0.23 7.29 ± 0.09 7.34 ± 0.14

9.48 ± 0.10 9.50 ± 0.03 9.56 ± 0.04 9.57 ± 0.04 9.49 ± 0.04 9.47 ± 0.06

RI PT

P. mirabilis P. mirabilis+ E. coli P. mirabilis + K. pneumoniae P. mirabilis +P. stuartii P. mirabilis + P. aeruginosa P. mirabilis + S. aureus

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) of five experiments

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT