Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 1965
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
INHIBITION OF AMINOACYL-sRNABINDING TO RIBOSOMJZS BY TETRACYCLINE Gerard0 Suarez* and Daniel Nathans Department of Microbiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
ReceivedJanuary15,
1965
Tetracycline
antibiotics
(Hash, 1963) and in extracts Ochoa, 1962; Franklin, the tetracycline5 cation
inhibit
of bacterial
1963).
binding
complex, and peptide
(Rendi and
pathway beyond the esterifi-
to distinguish peptide
three steps in the trans-
linkage:
binding
of messenger RNA
of aminoacyl-sRNA to the messenger RNA-ribosome We report
bond formation.
contrast
to chloramphenicol
specific
binding
Similar
in bacteria
and mansnalian cells
biosynthetic
is now possible
fer of amino acids from sRNA into to ribosomes,
synthesis
In cormnonwith puromycin and chloramphenicol
block the protein
of sRNA. It
protein
here that tetracycline,
and puromycin (Spyrides,
1964), inhibits
in the
of aminoacyl-SRNA to the ribosome-messenger RNA complex.
observations
have been made independently
by Hierowski
and Lipmann
(1964). Materials Preparation
of E. &&
and Methods
B, washed ribosomes,
high speed supernate
(S105) and esterified
sRNA were carried
out as previously
and Lipmann, 1961).
C14-phenylalanyl-sR
was acetylated
Haenni and Chappeville to publication. lysed with
0.1 N aassonia, all
Binding
to whom we are grateful
When the resulting
N-acetyl-phenylalanine (4:l:S).
(1964),
described
by the method of
for information
Cl4 -N-acetyl-phenylalsnyl-sRNA
the radioactivity
migrated with
termined by the method of Nirenberg
and.Leder
(1964).
was hydro-
acid-water
to ribosomes was deC14-polyuridylate
* Rockefeller Foundation Fellow, on leave from the Institute Chemistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. 743
prior
reference
on paper chromatography in butanol-acetic
of Cl4 -N-acetyl-phenylalanyl-sRNA
(Nathans
of Physiological
Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 1965
was prepared Schwarz lase
by polymerization
Bioresearch
from_M.
product
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS
Orangeburg,
lvsodeikticus
was treated
sephadex.
Inc.,
with
Radioactivity
of Cl4 UDP (21 mC/m Mole,
(a gift bentonite
N.Y.) of Dr.
was measured
sRNA was purchased
from General
was supplied
U),
from Miles
by Chas.
Pfizer
Roland
F. Beers,
on filter
based on the procedure
(poly
polynucleotide Jr.).
and Co.,
discs
Co.,
Co.,
Chagrin
Clifton,
New York,
The through
625
in a toluene-
of Mans and Novelli
Biochemicals Chemical
paper
from
phosphory-
to remove enzyme and passed
based scintillator
uridylate
with
purchased
(1960).
Falls,
N.J.
Ohio;
4. & poly-
Tetracycline
New York.
Result% As reported transfer (figure
of amino acids 1) .
by others from
Under conditions
(Rendi
and Ochoa,
sRNA to polypeptide of
1 5
limiting
18
ribosome
15
1962; is
Franklin,
inhibited
1963)
the
by tetracycline
and phenylalanyl-sRNA
20
TETRACVCLIWE, M x la5
i?,dlmm 1:
Inhibition by tetracycline of polyphenylalmine synthesis from phanylalanyl-si?NA. The following were incubated in a volume of 0.11 ml: 0.05 n Trir Bcl pH 7.4, 0.10 Y El, 0.014 x n&12, 0.01 M glutathioaa, 0.01 Bl phoaphoanolpyruvate, 2 pg pyruvate kinaae, 0.0001 H GTP, 0.5 m poly U, 0.48 A260 units of ribosoma, 5 pL 5105 md 50 pg slUU charged with C14-phenylalmine (8.5 x 104 cts/ud.n/w rRRA; 3.0 x 10s cts/d.d~ After incubation foe 10 min. at 3ooC, Mole phenylalanina). 0.1 ml aliquots were transferred to filter paper discs and analysed for protein radioactivity as notad in methods. In the absence of tetracycline 900 cpm was found in polypeptide. 744
Vol. 18, No. 5-6,1965
concentrations, alanine
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS
inhibition
was detectable
of incorporation at a tetracycline
As shown in Table 1, partial
reversal
of phenylalanine level
into
polyphenyl-
of 10m7 M and maximal at 10m4 M.
of inhibition
was observed at increased
TABLE 1
Jncorrboratiop Ribosoum 460 id&&
sJid&Jl
-Tet
us!a& Inhibitioq
ix!&
0.56
0.2
440
176
60
1.4
0.5
1400
838
40
2.8
1.0
2240
1690
25
7.0
2.5
2220
2060
6.5
Reversal of-the
tetracvcline
effect
by jncreased
and oolv U.
ribosoms
Incubation conditions are given in the legend of figure 1, except that the volume was 0.22 ml, the concentrations of ribosomes and poly U varied as noted in the table, and 100 ug sRNA (SSOO et&sin) was present. Tetracycline was added (+ Tet) at a concentration of 5 x 1~6 M.
ribosome plus poly U concentrations. increased
separately
consistent
When each of these components was
the decrease in inhibition
than when both were increased
of inhibition affected
was less marked and less
together.
In contrast
by ribosomes plus poly U, the degree of inhibition
by an eight-fold
by a five-fold
increase
The effect
increase
in phenylalanyl-sRNA
in the supernatant
of tetracycline
on the binding
et al.,
1963; Spyrides,
We have confirs&
1964; Raji and Raji,
ribosomes,
poly U and Cl40 phenylalanyl-sRWA,
negligible
hot trlchloroacetic
acid-precipitable 745
concentration
nor
of C14-phenylalanyl-sR initially
the ribosomes at 105,000 g for 2 hrs. and more recently and Leder (1964).
was not
fraction.
to ribosomes in the presence of poly U was studied
Nirenberg
to the reversal
by the method of
the results 1964) that
by sedimenting
of others
incubation
under conditions radioactivity
(Nakamoto of washed
where is detectable,
Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 1965
results
8lOCHEMlCAL AND 8lOPHYSlCAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
in ribosome-associated
exclude the possibility
that
counts, acid-soluble
somes under these conditions, to study the binding
fiable
after
hydrolysis
chromatography.
to the lack of effect
After
incubation
the radioactivity
were formed on the ribo-
of this
material
with
bound to ribosomes was identi-
in 0.1 N anrnonia as N-acetyl-phenylalanine
Conditions
As shown in the table,
peptides
In order to
we have used C14-N-acetyl-phenylalanyl-sRNA
reaction.
ribosomes and poly U all
dependent on poly U.
for the binding
tetracycline
inhibits
reaction
by co-
are given in Table 2.
the binding
reaction,
in contrast
of puromycin and chloramphenicol. TABLE 2
Fte/m inbound
Conditions
&9 ribosomes
Complete system
1700
-Poly u
310
-Ribosomes
156
+Puromycin low3 M
1670
tChloramphenico1
1610
iTetracycline
4 x lo-4 M
10'4 M
940
a.binding a N-acetvl-Rhenvlalanvl-sRNA u riboaomea The following were incubated in a volume of 0.10 ml: 0.05 M Tria UC1 pH 714, 0.02 MMgCl2, 40 wg poly U, 4.4 A260 units of ribosomes, 0.10 M RCl, 0.01 M glutathione, and 92 pg sRNA eaterified with C 14-N-acetyl-phenylalanine (4.2 x 104 cta/min/mg sRNA; 3.0 x 108 cts/min/p Mole N-acetyl-phenylalanine). After incubation at 300 for 10 min. 6 ml. of cold buffer was added (Trie HCl 0.1 M pH 7.2, MgC12 0.02 M, lCC1 0.1 M) and ribosomes collected, washed and counted on a Millipore filter as described by Nirenberg and Leder (1964).
The effect binding
of different
concentrations
of Cl4 -N-acetyl-phenylalanyl-sRNA
A comparison of the results to tetracycline formation.
Although
this
2.
1 and 2 suggests that the sensitivity
reaction
difference
on the
to ribosomes is shown in figure
of figures
of the binding
of tetracycline
is less than that of polypeptide
is due in part to the different 746
ribosome
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 1965
M x lo5
TETRACYCLIWE, Finure
Inhibition by tetracycline of the binding of N-acetylphenylalanyl-sRNA to ribosomes. Incubation conditions given in the legend of Table 2.
2:
and poly
U concentrations
difference
in maximal
is
almost
about
completely
50 per cent Since
template
the
cycline poly
inhibition inhibited,
the binding
tetracycline
effect
3).
of
is
is
a striking
polypeptide
inhibited
That
in the
this
is not
to the
synthesis extent
of
to the
the binding
on a polynucleotide
presented absence
of tetracycline
the effect
of messenger
of the
of tetrarecovered
and 80 per cent
conditions,
was inhibited
binding
42 per cent
of tetracycline
ribosome-messenger
747
and absence
83 per cent
Under similar
that
of the binding
the case was shown by measuring
in the presence
to ribosomes
We conclude
with
depends
be due to inhibition
10m4 M tetracycline.
of aminoacyl-sRNA
due to interference
could
In the experiment
M tetracycline.
the binding
binding
U to ribosomes
of C14-N-acetyl-phenylalanyl-siINA by 10’4
there
two reactions:
of aminoacyl-sRNA
U was bound to ribosomes
in the presence
of these whereas
to ribosomes.
of Cl4 -poly
(figure
incubations,
only.
of polynucleotide the binding
needed in these
are
RNA complex
RNA to ribosomes.
on is not
Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 1965
5
Finure
9:
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS
10
15
25
25
5
FRncllOR
NO.
10
15
20
25
Lack of effect of tetracycline on the binding of poly U to ribosomes. The following were incubated in a final volm of 0.2 ml: 0.05 M Tris UC1 pH 7.4, 0.01 H Mg acetate, 0.10 M KCl, 6 ug Cl4 poly U (6.5 x 106 ctsfminhg , 14 A260 units of ribosomes, and where indicated below, 10' 1 M tetracycline. All components except poly U were incubated for 10 minutes at 300, after which poly U was added, and the adxture allowed to remain at Ooc for 20 min. Centrifugation was carried out in an SW 39 Spinco rotor at 35,000 rpm for 90 min. in 5 ml of a linear 5 to 20 per cent sucrose gradient containing 0.01 M Tris UC1 pH 7.4, 0.01 M Mg acetate and 0.10 M KCl. Three-drop fractions were collected from the bottom of each tube and 0.05 ml taken for determination of cold trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity (-). A260 was measured at a dilution of 1:7 (..... ). A, complete system without tetracycline; B, complete system with 10'4 M tetracycline present during incubation and in the gradient. Centrifugation of Cl4-poly U in the absence of ribosomes gave a single peak of radioactivity at tube number 23.
Discussion The inhibitory
effect
of tetracycline
to be due to inhibition
of binding
messenger BNA complex.
Rather extensive
acids and to proteins, (Kohn, 1961); this hibitory
effect
polyphenylalanine
in protein synthesis
synthesis.
synthesis
appears
of aminoacyl-sRNA to the ribosomebinding
mediated by divalent
type of binding
on protein
of tetracycline
cations,
at a critical
has been reported
site
The observations
by tetracycline
is partially
creased ribosomes and poly U but not by increased 748
to nucleic
may underlie that
its
inhibition
inof
Overcome by in-
aminoacyl-sRNA suggests
Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 1965
that
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCHCOMMJNICATIONS
the antibiotic
may bind to one or more sensitive
concerned with binding that
of sRNA (Gilbert,
there are two binding
Rich,
1964; Arlinghaus
sites
1963).
reaction
antibiotic
only to the extent
Since tetracycline
the attachment
of polypeptitie
formation
of binding
of successive
molecules
it
inhibits
is possible
the that the
only one of the two sites
of sRNA. Alternatively,
may simply
reflect
the partial
of aminoacyl-sRNA during
phenylalanyl-sRNA.
blocked the synthesis This inhibition
plus poly U in the incubation or supernatant
fraction.
and chloramphenicol, alanyl-sRNA unaffected. completely
the greater inhibition
growth of the
Although
from
ribosomes
mixture
but not by increased
minoacyl-sRNA
In contrast
to the lack of effect
of puromycin
tetracycline
to ribosomes,
of polyphenylalanine
was reversed by increased
reduced the binding
whereas the binding
polyphenylalanine
by tetracycline, about 50 per cent.
of N-acetyi-phenyl-
of poly U to ribosomes was
synthesis
aminoacyl-sRNA binding
was inhibited
almost
to ribosomes was inhibited
We suggest that tetracykline
ribosomes in such a way as to obstruct
one of the two sites
may combine with for the binding
of aminoacyl-sRNA.
This research has been supported by grant No. GM 10180 from the National Institutes
on
chain.
Tetracycline
maximally
of 50 per cent,
binds in such a way as to obstruct
inhibition
peptide
Recent work has indicated
1964), one of which may hold the peptidyl-sRNA
et al.,
the ribosome concerned with
on the ribosome
for sRNA on each 70s ribosome (Warner ancl
and the other the next sminoacyl-sRNA. binding
sites
of Bealth,
USPES. 749
Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 1965
BlOCHEMlCAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.
Arlinghaus, R., Shaeffer, J. and Schweet, R., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 2, 1291 (1964). Franklin, T. J., Biochem. J., 87, 449 (1963). Gilbert, W., J. Mol. Biol., 5, 389 (1963). Haenni, A. L. and Chappeville, F., J. Mol. Biol., in press. Hash, J. H., Fed. Proc., z, 301 (1963). Hierowski, M. and Lipmann, F., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., in press. Kaji, A. and Kaji, H., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Corn., I& 186 (1963). Kohn, K. W., Nature, 191, 1156 (1961). Mans, R. J. and Novelli, G. D., Arch. Biochem. 94, 48 (1961). Nakamoto, T., Conway, T. W., Allende, J. E., Spyrides, G. J. and Lipmann, 'F., Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quent. Biol. 2, 227 (1963). Nathans, D. and Lipmann, F., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 41, 497 (1961) Nirenberg, M. and Leder, P., Science 145, 1399 (1964). Rendi, R. and Ochoa, S., J. Biol. Chem., 273, 3711 (1962). Spyrides, G., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., z, 1220 (1964). Warner, J. R. and Rich, A., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., x, 1134 (1964)
750