Inhibition of host cell reactivation in phage T1 by caffeine

Inhibition of host cell reactivation in phage T1 by caffeine

Vol. 14, No. 4, 1964 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS INHIBITION OF HOST CELL REACTIVATION Walter Sauerbier, IN PHAGE TI BY CAFF...

250KB Sizes 0 Downloads 57 Views

Vol. 14, No. 4, 1964

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

INHIBITION OF HOST CELL REACTIVATION Walter Sauerbier,

IN PHAGE TI BY CAFFEINE.

Institut fHr Genetik der Universit~t

+)

zu K~in.

Received November 18, 1963

Evidence

has been compiled that host cell reactivation

(HCR) of DW irradiated phage is due to direct repair of UV lesions

(Sauerbier,

we proffered

reversion of the

in the phage and bacterial

deoxyribonucleic

(DNA). Subsequent

Howard-Flanders

b). To explain our results

of an enzymatic

support this View,

Harm,

1962a,

the hypothesis

UV photoproducts acid

1961;

experiments

by Metzger

(1963) strongly

although proof is still lacking.

et ai.,

1962; Hill,

(See also:

1958; R~rsch et ai.,

1

f9o3;

1969.)

The experiments

described

HCR can be selectively host cell reactivabie

in this paper demonstrate

inhibited by caffeine, UV photoproduct

(i) that

and (2) that the

is somehow eliminated by

HCR from the DNA of UV irradiated TI without requiring either synthesis

of Tl-messenger

ribonucieic

acid

(m-RNA)

or phage

replication. Experiments:

The UV survival

of TI is determined

after pre-

adsorption to coii B, and plating on Bs_ I (Hill, 1955), curve A). When TI is preadsorbed

in the presence

(2 gr/i00 ml), diluted through buffer containing plated on caffeine

supplemented plates

(Fig. i~

of caffeine caffeine,

and

(0.75 gr of caffeine/100

+) Dedicated to Professor Dr. Boris Rajewsky on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

340

ml

Vol. 14, No. 4, 1964

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 5E C 60

OF UV 120

180

2,;0

I\ -i

\ ~:~-2 U3

0

\

I -3"

TI 0 -4

Fi$. i

Inhibition of HCR bY caffeine. Survival of uv

irradiated TI. Curve B: with caffeine. Curve A: without caffeine. Broken line: control plating on host without HCR.

in the top agar),

curve B, Fig. i, is obtained. HCR is

abolished in more than 99% of the complexes. Direct plating of UV irradiated TI with coli B on caffeine supplemented plates leads to the same result. There is no effect of caffeine on the UV survival of TI when plated with Bs_ I.

(In these experiments

adsorption bacteria were grown in M-9 (Anderson,

341

1949) to

Vol. 14, No. 4, 1964

2 x i0 ~ ce!is/ml,

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

chloramphenicol

(CI~, 73 ~,/ml) was added,

and

incubation was continued for 30 minutes at 37 °. The bacteria were then shifted to TI absorption medium Benzer,

(T!-ADS; Watson,

ref.

1952 ) containing M/500 KCN. Following the CM~ treatment

all bacteria perform HCR of Ti with the same efficiency as the ~0~ fraction at direct plating of UV irradiated TI Sauerbier,

1962c).

(e.g. see

Irradiations were performed with a low

pressure mercury vapor lamp, 0SRAM HNS 12, emitting predominantly the 254 mD line with an intensity of about 3 ergs/ mm

2

see at sample distance. The second type of experiments was designed to determine

(i) whether HCR occurs in the absence of m-RNA and of DNA synthesis,

and (2) to measure the time course of HCR. As

bacterial host we used the adenine and arginine requiring coli strain B9~

(Gollub and Gots,

1959),

can be blocked by adenine withdrawal

in which RNA and DNA synthesis (Volkin, 1960). As a control

we infected washed B9~ with TI and incubated in aerated M-9 at 37 ° for 120 minutes, leased.

in which time no progeny phage was re-

(Strain B9# was kindly supplied to our lab by

Dr. E. Volkin.) Experiment: B94, arginine, in M-9

thoroughly starved for adenine and for

was infected with UV irradiated TI and incubated in

(~ 6-azauracil,

250 ~!"ml; see Pardee and Prestidge,

1960).

Then, HCR was blocked at different times after infection by plating the complexes with Bs_ I on caffeine supplemented tryptone plates. The fraction of plaque forming complexes is given in Fig. 2, curve B. In a rapidly increasing fraction of the complexes HCR becomes insensitive to caffeine. After 10-15 minutes most complexes apparently had performed HCR in the absence of m-RNA and of DNA synthesis.

(Attention is drawn to the fact that the block

342

Vol. 14, No. 4, 1964

BIOCHEMICALAND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

of HCR must be d e l a y e d into the cells.) lengthening to about

The result

of the latent

20 minutes.

of caffeine

by the time needed is in good

period

agreement

of ~

Ti from

are plated

if HCR is not blocked

- Fig.

the caffeine

w i t h the

irradiated

W h e n the complexes

- i.e.,

to diffuse

13

on plates

2, curve

A is

obtained. h/IN 0

/NCUBATION I N M - 9 30 60 90

I -2

I

120

I

I

/

o~

o-3

-4 -O

Fi$.

2

Time

course

of DNA synthesis. times

after

control

shifted

to B94

at time

since

on caffeine

zero to M-9

2, yields

two models

Ti

and

at various

plate.

of UV irradiated

(starved

of m-RNA

plates

Curve B: caffeine

Survival

Curve B, Fig. HCR~

Plating

infection.

plate.

preadsorbed

of HCR in the absence

Curve

and arginine),

(+ 2 5 0 ~ / m i

6-azauracil)

no i n f o r m a t i o n

are compatible

343

with

A:

(150 secs),

for adenine

and at 37 ° .

on the kinetics the results.

free

of

Vol. 14, No. 4, 1964

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

(1)HCR is a randomly occurring~ bacterial

instantaneous event in each

ceil. At any given time~ there are two populations

of complexes:

those in which HCR has occurred and those in

which HCR has not yet occurred. Longer times of incubation increase the probability that HCR has occurred in any given complex. (2)HCR is a gradually occurring process in every complex - i.e., there is only one population of complexes. Each reactivable UV lesion is reactivated with equal probability.

The

probability of being reactivated increases with longer times of incubation. If complete TI UV survival curves are measured with B9# treated as described above),

assumption

(pre-

(i) would predict a

series of biphasic curves when caffeine is added at dif~'erent times after infection. Assumption

(2) predicts monophasic curves

with different slopes. Fig. 3 shows that

(2) is essentially

correct. Thus, we may conclude from Fig. 2, curve B, that HCR is proceeding in every complex at approximately the same rate.

Discussion: (i) These experiments show that caffeine in concentrations of about 10-2M is an efficient and selective inhibitor of HCR in phage TI.

(2) HCR is not inhibited by caffeine,

after prolonged periods of incubation

added

(Fig. 2). This implies

that within a relatively short time HCR has achieved a state in which it is no longer sensitive to caffeine.

(3) The

occurance of HCR in the absence of m-RNA and of DNA synthesis suggests that HCR directly alters the reactivable UV photoproduct in the phage DNA. We have no detailed knowledge of the mode of caffeine action on HCR. Since photoreactivation proceeds in the presence of 3~

Vol. 14, No. 4, 1964

0

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 5EC OF UV 60 90

30

120

150

@ \

~-2

\ -3

Fi$. 3

Survival curves after intermediate desrees of HCR.

UV survival of TI, preadsorbed to CMP treated,

and adenine-

arginine starved B94, plated on caffeine plates after various times of incubation in M-9

(+ 250 ~ / m l

6-azauracil)

at 37 ° .

Curve A, after 0-3 min; B, after i0 min; C, after 30 min. Curve D is plated after 40 min on plates without caffeine.

caffeine

(Metzger, 1963, personal communication),

it probably

does not form a complex with the reactivable UV photoproduct thus sterica!!y inhibiting the formation of an enzyme-substrate complex. More likely, HCR enzyme itself,

the caffeine is bound reversibly to the

since it can be readily diluted out without

affecting HCR under conditions where de novo synthesis of HCR enzyme is impossible.

345

Vol. 14, No. 4, 1964

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Acknowledsements: It is a pleasure to acknowledge the cooperation of Dr. K. Metzger and the assistance of Mrs. Gisela Goes.

REFERENCES Anderson, E.H , Proc. Natl. Aead. Sci. U.S. 32,120 (1949) Benzer, S., J. Bacteriol. 63, 59 (1952) Goilub, E.G., and Gots, J.~., J. Bacteriol. 7_~8, 320 (1959) Harm, W., Z. Vererb.-Lenre 94, 67 (1963) Hill, R.F., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 30, 636 (1958) Howard-Flanders, P., Boyce, R.P., and Theriot, L., Nature 195, 51 (1962) Metzger, K., Photoehem. Photobi01. (1963) in press; personal communication (1963) Pardee, A.B., and Prestidge, L.S., Biochim. Biophys. Aeta 37, 5#~ (196o) R~rseh, A., Edelman, A., and Cohen, J.A., Bioehim. Biophys. Acta 68, 263 ( 1 9 6 3 ) Sauerbier, W., VirologY-!5, 465 (1961); Virology 16, 398 (1962a); Z. Vererb.-Lehre 93, 220 (1962b)~-Virology 17, 164 (1962c)

3~