2685
633 INHIBITION OF NUCLEIC ACID AND CHROMATIN BINDING OF THE RAT PROSTATE ANDROGEN RECEPTOR BY PYRIDOXAL PHOSPHATE, HEPARIN AND CIBACRON BLUE Eppo Mulder, Lida Vrij & John A. Foekens Department of Biochemistry (Division of Chemical Endocrinology) Medical Faculty, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Received7-5-80 ABSTRACT
The androgen receptor from rat prostate binds 5a-dihydrotestosterone and related androgenic steroids at a steroid binding site and in addition shows selective binding to structures related to nucleic acids (chromatin binding site). Cytoplasmic androgen receptor, labeled with the synthetic androgen methyltrienolone (R 1881) was readily bound at 4oC by 2' ,5'-ADP-agarose, DNA-cellulose and phosphocellulose. The binding to ADP-agarose and DNA-cellulose was used as a model for study of the nucleic acid binding site of the receptor. Complete elution of androgen re'ceptors from these matrices could be obtained with low concentrations of pyridoxal phosphate (10 mM), heparin (0.2 mg/ml) and Cibacron blue (0.4 mM). Sodium molybdate (10 mM) did not interfere significantly with binding of the androgen receptor to ADPagarose and had little effect on elution of receptors from the gel. Pyridoxal phosphate, heparin and Cibacron blue in low ionic strength buffers were also shown to be very effective for the extraction of androgen receptors from nuclei of rat prostatic tissue. These results suggest gross similarities in the structure of the androgen receptor with activated forms of receptors for corticoids, estrogens and progestins with respect to nucleic acid binding.
Abbreviations: 5a-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 17g-hydroxy5a-androstan-3-one; methyltrienolone (R 1881), 178-hydroxy17-methyl-4,9,11-estratrien-3-one; TEDG buffer, a buffer with Tris-HCl, EDTA, dithiothreitol and glycerol as defined in the method section; TED buffer, the same buffer without glycerol; Cibacron blue, C-1.61211, also known as Reactive Blue 2 and Procion Blue HB. Volume36, Ntier 6
s
TDICOXDI
December, 1980
INTRODUCTION It is generally cytoplasmic change
accepted
receptor
for nuclear
receptor
complexes
be a prerequisite Several sary
studies
step
have
shown
receptors
(7) selectively
shown
or phosphocellulose.
structural
requirements
effects.
is also
a neces-
and phosphocellu-
sites
various
that pyridoxal (6), heparin
the binding
and estradiol-receptor
progesteronecellulose
acid
inhibit
to
of the interaction
binding
(4,5), aurintricarboxylic
cron blue
is thought
and progesterone
ATP-sepharose
It was
a high
of steroid-
sites
that activation
on the nature
used.
to
a conformation
of the hormonal
of corticoid
bind
to a form with
acceptor
and chromatin
have been
hormones
(1). Binding
for expression
to DNA-cellulose,
reagents phate
("activation")
to nuclear
(2,3). In studies
between
steroid
and induce
chromatin
for binding
receptors lose
proteins
in the receptor
affinity
that
for binding
could
to DNA-
imply
of these
and Ciba-
of corticoid-,
complexes
This
phos-
certain
receptors
to
DNA. Similar receptor
information
which
testosterone formation receptor
specifically
and related
could
binds
be important
extensively
and estrogen purified.
of androgen
cellulose
steroids
because
In a previous
(9). In this report
(8). Such dn-
the labile
as well
receptors,
receptors
for the androgen
Sa-dihydrotestosterone,
androgenic
is not yet characterized
progesterone
binding
is not available
which
androgen
as corticoid, have been more
study we observed
to heparin-agarose we describe
and DNA-
the selective
interference of different chemical reagents with binding of the androgen-receptor complex to 2',5'-ADP-agarose and DNAcellulose. MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials. - 11,2,6,7-3HI-testosterone (93 Ci/mmol) was obtained from the Radiochemical Centre, Amersham, U.K. and 117a-methyl-3HI-methyltrienolone (87 Ci/mmol) was obtained from New England Nuclear, Dreieich, Germany. Pyridoxal-5phosphate was obtained from Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany. Cibacron Blue F3G-A, heparin- and ATP-agarose (adenosine-5'triphosphate attached through ribose hydroxyls with a 6carbon spacer to agarose, 2.2 pmol/ml) were obtained from Sigma, U.S.A. ADP-agarose (2',5'-ADP-sepharose-4B, 2 pmol/ml) was obtained from Pharmacia, Sweden. Phosphocellulose (cellulose phosphate) was obtained from Whatman Inc., U.K. Protamine sulfate was bought from Organon, Oss, The Netherlands. DNA-cellulose (150 pg/g) was prepared according to Alberts and Herrick (10). Cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors. - Cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors were prepared from rat prostates one day after castration. A buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.01 M Tris-HCl, 1.5 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM dithiothreitol, with 10% glycerol (TEDG buffer) was used for preparation of cytosol. Prostatic tissue was homogenized in 3 volumes TEDG buffer and the 100,000 x g cytosol fraction was isolated (11). Cytosol fractions were incubated for 2 h at OoC with 10 nM labeled methyltrienolone. In control experiments a lOO-fold excess non-radioactive methyltrienolone was added together with 13HI-methyltrienolone. Cytosols with radiolabeled androgen receptors were stored at -200C for periods up to 2 weeks. For binding to the different matrices cytosol (8 ml) was incubated with thoroughly washed gel (2 ml) for 2 h at 6oC under continuous gentle agitation. For preparations of nuclear pellets prostate tissue was incubated for 1 h at 37OC in Eagle's minimal essential medium with 20 nM 13Hltestosterone. The tissue was homogenized as above and the 700 x g pellet was prepared. The pellet was washed with TEDG buffer with 0.2% Triton X-100 and subsequently two times with TEDG buffer. Nuclear receptors were extracted as indicated in the legend of Table III. Estimation of androgen receptors by protamine sulfate precipitation. - Androgen receptors were estimated essentially as described by Chamness -et al. (12). In albumincoated tubes 250 ~1 protamine sulfate (1 mg/ml), 200 ~1 TEDG buffer and 50 ~1 sample were mixed and the protamine sulfate precipitate was isolated by centrifugation. The precipitate was washed several times with TEDG buffer and dissolved in Soluene (Packard Instruments) for estimation of radioactivity
S
TXIROXDD
by liquid scintillation counting in a Searle Isocap/300 cooled liquid scintillation system model 6879. Protein determination. Peterson (13).
- Protein
RESULTS The androgen
receptor
rats one day after trienolone, receptor drogenases lone
Table
cytosol
I. The amount
amount
with
with
steroid
experiments
with
eluted
in the 0.4 M KC1 fraction
radioactive
sucrose
(15,16) and chromatography that
50-80%
eluates
was
sis prevents
The percentage
probably
a complete
2',5'-ADP-agarose recovery
studies
receptors
androgen
it was
LH-20
analysis
purification
by
(17) showed
receptor
of labeled
10%
from experi-
in the eluates
recovery
were
less than
centrifugation
but dissociation
the highest
of receptors
In recent gesterone
higher,
of radio-
Additional
on sephadex
of the radioactivity
receptor-bound.
was
gradient
with
containing
the amount
only.
in
from the
in the eluates
steroid
gel el'ectrophoresis,
are shown
cytosol
activity
agar
steroid
ATP-
from the matrices
non-labeled
with
dehy-
of methyltrieno-
calculated
eluted
of radioactivity
for this
2',5'-ADP-agarose,
was
of
13HI-methyl-
affinity
studies
excess
ments
with
high
lOO-fold
of the amount
to
cytosol
by 3-hydroxysteroid
of binding
of receptor
In control
labeled
and phosphocellulose
of radioactive
0.4 M KCl.
was
receptor
DNA-cellulose
in the prostate
to attack
(14). Results
labeled
agarose,
present
androgen
and not liable
according
AND DISCUSSION
castration
a synthetic
was estimated
was in the
during
analy-
receptors.
With
and a good
obtained. shown
are only bound
that corticoid
and pro-
to DNA-cellulose
or ATP-
s
TDEOSDII
637
Table I. Binding of cytoplasmic androgen receptors to different matrices. % receptor recovered
purification factor
ATP-agarose
67 19
47 43
Phosphocellulose
82
23
DNA-cellulose
30
39
DNA-cellulose, limited washing procedure '1
52
38
ADP-agarose
Prostate cytosol (4 ml) labeled with /3HI-methyltrienolone was incubated with the different matrices (1 ml) for 2 h at 6oC under continuous gentle agitation. The mixture was transferred to small glass columns (10 mm diameter) and washed successively with 10 ml of TEDG buffer, of TEDG buffer with 0.05 M KC1 and of TEDG buffer with 0.1 M KCl. The receptors were eluted with 10 ml of 0.4 M XCl. Corrections for non-specifically bound steroid were obtained from arallel experiments with cytosol labeled with 1Ii3 WI -methyltrienolone in the presence of a lOO-fold excess of the non-radioactive compound. The "purification factor" was estimated as the ratio of the amount of receptor per mg protein of the 0.4 M KC1 eluate versus the amount of receptor per mg protein of the original cytosol. ') Washing of the gel with 0.05 and 0.1 M KC1 containing buffers was omitted.
agarose after a temperature-dependent activation step and that sodium molybdate was effective in preventing this process f18,19). The presence of 10 mM sodium molybdate decreased receptor binding
to
13% under the incubation
conditions as given in Table I. In the present study androgen receptors from prostate cytosol, freshly prepared in TEDG buffer without sodium molybdate at O°C, were bound by ADP-agarose and the other
matrices.
Receptors
similarly.
However,
tion profiles
in cytosol
stored
differences
were
on sucrose
cytosol
sedimenting
cytosol
mainly
at 3.5-4
observed
gradients,
mainly
at -2OOC
behaved in sedimenta-
receptors
from fresh
at 8-9 S and those
from stored
Formation
S (Fig. 1, left panel).
of slower
of the of proteolytic in detail
by WiLson
gradation
et al. --
to proteolytic to the
be involved.
do not
a process. The effect
of
on the by
androgen
a nucleotide-containing
investigated
mainly
Fig.
the selective
2 shows
ADP-agarose receptor
purification step.
was
The sucrose
labeled phosphate
with
ADP-agarose binding
and the removal
protein
of
generally gradient
of androgen
washing
obtained
receptors
amounts
steps.
in a single
sedimentation
profile
of the
from ADP-agarose
with
showed
a peak
of radioactivity
sedimenting
S, comparable
of the slower
sedimenting
(Fig. 1). The effects
heparin,
Cibacron
of the receptor-bound
pyridoxal
to the sedimentation
at value
form of the original_ cytoplasmic
receptor
blue
of non-
adsorption
eluted
3.5-4
by
A fifty-fold
receptor
approximately
was
and DNA-cellulose.
of considerable
in different
backbone
of pyridoxal
and sodium radioactivity
molybdate
phosphate, on the elution
from ADP-agarose
and
S Cytosoi
TDEOXDI
639
receptor
DPA
Eluoh
ADP-agarosa
DPEJ
x10’ !
S: 7.2
4.6 3.6
S: 7.2
4.6
4
3
2
lb fraction
i0
number
Fig. 1. - Profiles of 3H-radioactivity after sucrose gradient centrifugation of androgen receptors labeled with \3HI-methyltrienolone. Left panel: Cytosol receptors in TEDG buffer centrifuged T----.----lmmedlately after preparation ("fresh"); after storage for one week at -2OOC ("1 week -2OoC"); control experiment with an excess of a lOO-fold non-radioactive methyltrienolone, with identical results for both fresh and stored cytosol ("control"). Right -- 7" panel: ----- Receptors eluted from ADP-agarose with 10 mM pyrldoxal phosphate in 50 mM borate buffer pH 8 (see Fig. 2). A 200 ~1 portion of the different fractions was centrifuged at l°C in linear 5-20% sucrose gradients in TEDG buffer for 18 h at 310,000 x gav in a Beckman SW-60 rotor (left panel) or for 2 h 45 min at 370,000 x gav in a Beckman VTi-65 rotor (right panel). The sedimentation markers indicate positions of y-globulin (7.2 S), bovine serum albumin (4.6 S) and ovalbumin (3.6 S).
S
640
receptor
TEIROXDII
protein--
-
Fig.
2. - Elution with pyridoxal phosphate of methyltrienolone labeled androgen receptor from 2',5'-ADPagarose. Labeled rat prostate cytosol was incubated with ADP-agarose as described in the method section and the ADP-agarose (2 ml) was transferred to a small column and washed with TEDG buffer, pH 7.4 (l), TEDG buffer with 0.05 M KC1 (2), TEDG buffer with 0.1 M KC1 (3), 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5 (4), 10 mM pyridoxal phosphate in 50 mM borate buffer, pH 8 (5) and 0.4 M KC1 in TEDG buffer, pH 7.4 (6). In a control experiment with cytosol labeled in the presence of an excess non-radioactive methyltrienolone no radioactive steroid remained bound to the gel after washing with phosphate buffer (line not shown in the figure).
DNA-cellulose and Cibacron phate.
are shown blue
Heparin
0.02 mg/ml, 10,000). receptors
was
are more already
or 0.002 mM
Sodium
in Table
effective active
(assuming
molybdate
from ADP-agarose
II. On a molar
was
base
than pyridoxal
heparin phos-
in a concentration
of
a molecular
of
less effective
and DNA-cellulose.
weight
for removal
of
S
TB&OXDI
Table II. Effect of pyridoxal phosphate, heparin, Cibacron blue and sodium molybdate on the elution of androgen receptors from ADP-agarose and DNAcellulose. matrix
concentration
reagent
% receptor eluted
ADP-agarose 1KlM
84 19
Heparin
0.2 mg/ml 0.02 mg/ml
90 38
Cibacron blue
0.4 mM 0.04 mM
95 64
10 mM
24
10 mM
14
Pyridoxal phosphate
Sodium molybdate
10 mM
DNA-cellulose Pyridoxal phosphate Heparin
0.2 mg/ml
75
Cibacron blue
0.4 mM
78
Prostate cytosol labeled with 13H\-methyltrienolone was incubated with the gels for 2 h at 6oC and washed with buffers l-4 as indicated in Fig. 2. Fractions of the gels (0.5 ml, containing approximately 400 fmol receptor) were incubated for 15 min at 4oC with 1 ml of the different reagents. The suspension was centrifuged for 10 min at 800 x g and the supernatant collected. This incubation procedure was repeated twice. The amounts of receptor in the pooled supernatants were estimated by protamine sulfate precipitation. The values are means of duplicate experiments.
Over 80% of the steroid eluted from the gels could be precipitated with protamine sulfate. Only after heating to 60°C for 20 min or incubation overnight at 15'C with excess nonradioactive steroid, no radioactivity could be demonstrated in the protamine sulfate
precipitates. This indicates the
presence of a saturable binding protein that is denaturated at 60°C and capable of exchange of labeled and non-labeled
S
642
steroid
at 15'C. Both criteria
from non-specific reagents acids
only
was
androqen
with
effective
isolated
labeled
reagents
nuclei
in vitro -~
labeled
data
in Table
blue
and heparin
blue
The specific separate
of tissue
receptors
methyltrienolone
between
used
receptors
binding
The
(8).
Cibacron are as for the
nuclear in the
and DNA-cellu-
pyridoxal
and the binding nucleic
region
13H/-
in the cell nucleus.
of the different
from the androgen
with
(0.4 M KC11
to ADP-agarose
containing
binding
buffer
a similarity
to chromatin
and heparin
chromatin
rats were
androqen
from prostate
suggest
to
androgen
phosphate,
salt solutions
of the interaction
effect
receptors
minces
nuclear
strength
receptors
or the matrices
study
not
matrices,
/3HI-5a-dihydrotestosterone
experiments
the binding
were
of one day castrated
this condition
of androgen
The nature
to the
of
from these
For this
in a low ionic
of androgen
lose with
nuclei
tissue
binding
of androgen
III show that pyridoxal
These
pellets.
Cibacron
as well.
as concentrated
extraction
to nucleic
and DNA-cellulose
binding
with
with
of receptors
by incubation
Under
testosterone.
binding
with
in prostatic
effective
the different
of receptors
interfering
for removal
cell
are mainly
receptors
of methyltrienolone
to ADP-agarose
interfere
receptors
Therefore
binding
binding
androgen
not affected.
receptors
but could
distinguish
proteins.
interfered
The different
apart
binding
on the gel, whereas
receptor
only
TDROIDCS
of receptors acids
reagents
in the present
demonstrate
a
molecule
The synthetic study
to
is not known.
of the receptor
site.
phosphate,
androgen
has a high
affi-
S
T~ROLDI
643
Table III. Extraction of labeled receptors from nuclear pellets obtained from rat prostates incubated in vitro. -extraction medium
fmol/lOO mg prostate
Buffer
8+
2
0.4 M KC1
53 2 10
0.6 M KC1 (repeated twice)
692
3
Cibacron blue, 0.4 mM
45+
3
Heparin, 0.2 mg/ml
602
9
Pyridoxal phosphate, 10 mM
532
6
6+
3
Sodium molybdate, 10 mM
Prostates obtained from one day castrated rats were incubated with 2.10-B M 13Hf-testosterone and in a parallel experiment with an additional amount of 2.10-6 M non-radioactive testosterone. A thoroughly washed nuclear pellet was prepared and extracted for 1 h at 4oC. The amount of radioactive steroid extracted was estimated and corrected for non-specifically bound steroid with the values obtained from the parallel incubation. The extraction media used were: TED buffer, pH 8.4; 0.4 M KC1 in TED buffer, pH 8.4; 0.6 M KC1 in TED buffer, pH 8.4 the extraction procedure was repeated twice and the extracts were combined; Cibacron blue 0.4 mM in TED buffer, pH 8.4; heparin 0.2 mg/ml in TED buffer, pH 8.4: pyridoxal phosphate 10 mM in 50 mM borate buffer, pH 8.4; sodium molybdate 10 mM in TED buffer, pH 8.4. The values are means + S.D. of triplicate experiments.
nity for the prostate androgen receptor and did not dissociate from the receptor under the influence of the different reagents at 4OC. From comparable studies with .corticoid and progesterone receptors it has been suggested that the effects of pyridoxal phosphate might involve essential lysine
E-aIdnO-grOUpS
in the binding region of the receptor
(4,5). The effects of Cibacron blue F3G-A are often explained as effects on proteins containing a 'dinucleotide fold" (21)
(many dehydrogenases and kinasesf, although not all proteins binding to Cibacron blue show this super-secondary structure (22). It is noteworthy that the sulfate groups in Cibacron blue and the phosphate groups in 2',5'-ADP-agarose show a similar spatial orientation
(21). In general Cibacron blue
might act as a substance showing both localized cation exchange properties and some hydrophobic interactions. The lower optimal concentrations of heparin and Cibacron blue compared to pyridoxal phosphate required for interference with receptor binding to chromatin might indicate the involvement of a spatial arrangement of more than one negatively
charged
group separated by a less polar region. In conclusion, the present study shows that androgen receptors interact with structures containing nucleic acids in a similar way as corticoid, progesterone and estradiol-17% receptors. For these receptors an "activation" process is required before binding to the nucleic acid matrix occurs (23). For the cytoplasmic androgen receptor prepared as described in this report, we always observed, irrespective of a distinct activation step, binding to the different matrices. This is not necessarily an essential difference between the various receptor systems, but might indicate a difference in the rate of formation of an "activated" form. A similar effect has been observed for the estrogen receptor for which binding to DNA-cellulose at 4OC was shown to accelerate the conversion of the 4 S to the 5 S (activated) form of the receptor (24).
We wish to thank Dr. H.J. van der Molen for his continuous interest in our work and constructive criticism of this manuscript. REFERENCES Nature 278, 752-754 (1979). P. J. Biol. Chem,
A. and Foley, R. Kalimi, M., Colman, P. and Feigeison, 5:Munck, 250, 1080-1086 (1975).
MilE, J.B. and Taft, D.O. Biochemistry x, 173-177 (1978). 4. Cake, M.H., Di Sorbo, D.M. and Litwack, G. J. Biof. Chem. 253, 4886-4891 (1978). 5. Nishigori.,. and Toft, D. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 91559161 (1979). 6. Moudgil., V.K. and Weekes, G.A. FEBS Lett, 2, 324-326 (1978). 7. Kumar, S-A., Beach, T.A. and Dickerman, H.W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 2199-2203 (5979). 8. Mainwaring, W.I.P. The Mechanism of Action of Androgens, Springer-Verlag, New York (1977). 9. Mulder, E., Foekens, J.A., Petexs, M.J. and van der Molen, H.J. FEBS Lett. 97, 260-264 (1979). 10. Alberts, B.M. and Herrick, G. Methods Enzymol. 21, 198. 217 (1971). l.1,Hpiisaeter, P.A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 3x7, 492-499 (1973). 12. Chamness, G.C., Huff, K. and McGuire, W.L. Steroids 25, 627-635 (1975). 13. Peterson, G.L. Anal. Biochem. 83, 346-356 (197'7). 14. Bonne, G. and Raynaud, J.P. Steroids z, 497-507 (1976). 15. Mulder, E., Peters, M.J., van Beurden, W.M.O. and van der Molen, H-3. FEBS Lett. 47, 209-211 f1974). 16. Mulder, E., Peters, M.J., de Vxies, J., van der Mofen, H.J.r gstgaard, K., Eik-Nes, K.B. and Gftebro, R. Molec. Cell. Endocr. 11, 309-323 (1978). 17. Sirett, D.A.N. and Grant, J.K. J. Endocr. 77, 101-110 (1978). 18. Leach, X.L., Dahmerr M.K.# Hammond, N-D., Sancho, J.J. and Pratt, W.B. J. 3iol. Chem. 254, 11884-11890 (1979). 19. Toft, D. and Nishigori, H. J. Steroid Biochem. 11, 413~ 416 (1979). 20. Wilson, E.M. and French, F.S. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 6310.. 6319 (1979). 21. Thompson, S.T., Cass, K.H. and Stellwagen, 33. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 669-672 (1975). 22. Beissner, R.S., Quiocho, F.A. and Rudolph, F.B. J. Mol. Biol. 134, 847-850 (1979). 23. Bailly, A., Le Fevre, B., Savouxet, J.-F. and Milgrom, E. J. Biol. Chem. 255, 2729-2734 (1980). 24. Yamamoto, K.R. and Alberts, 3.M. PXOC * Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2, 2105-2109 (1972). 3.