Vol. 88, No. 1, 1979
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
May 14, 1979
Pages 117-123
INHIBITION
OF VESICULAR STOMATITIS VIRUS TRANSCRIPTASE BY THE VIRION ENVELOPE M PROTEIN Arlette
Institut
COMBARD and Christiane
de Microbiologic, Orsay
91405
Received
March
PRINTZ
COMPLEX
AN6
(B3t. 409), Universit6 Cedex, France
Paris-Sud,
2,1979
SUMMARY. An inhibition of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase associated with Vesicular Stomatitis Virus occurredwhen the reaction was stimulated by whole virions and not by enzymatically active ribonucleocapsid (RNP) cores. The matrix (M) protein and the glycoprotein (G), both components of the virion envelope, were purified and added separately to the polymerase reaction stimulated by RNP cores. The G protein fraction had no effect on the reaction, except in some experiments ; in that case, the inhibition was demonstrated to be the consequence of a NTPase activity. The M protein fraction never showed such an activity, but induced a strong inhibition of the polymerase reaction. The data presented suggest that the M protein is the transcriptase inhibitor present in the whole virions. Previous
studies
transcription
on ts'
rate
of viral
an altered
matrix
(1).
the report
Since
the envelope, tion sured protein virus, reaction.
Sendai
virus,
We report activity
inhibiting These
the envelope
viral
suggested
complex
from
the effects
the presence,
effect
of another
of
negative
VSV meaboth
M
strand transcriptase
of purified
of the virion
within transcrip-
that
on the in Vitro
of the addition
protein
proteins
a possible
activity
(5) have demonstrated
of the
synthesizing
envelope
the in Vitro
et al.
the second
(2),
observations
Marx
had an inhibitory below
(G),
4).
by mutants
one of the virion
on the transcriptase
Moreover,
and glycoproteins
and glycoprotein merase
(3,
infected
is
and Kingsbury
component
of the M protein in Vitro.
which
of Perrault
of a viral
of VSV have shown an enhancement
mRNA in cells
(MI protein,
has been documented
effect
mutants
M protein
envelope,
on the poly-
of VSV-RNP cores. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Viral material : The wild type strain of VSV (Indiana serotype) was grown on chick embryo cells as previously described (6). Fresh stocks were purified by centrifuging to equilibrium (Spinco rotor SW 27, overnight at 5' C, 25,OOC rpm) in a preformed glycerol (30-O%)-potassium tartrate (O-SO%) gradient containing Tris 10 mM, NaCl 1 M, EDTA ImM, pH 7.6. RNP cores were extracted from purified virions according to Breindl and Holland (3) and used immedia' Abbreviationsused : ts, temperature sensitive ; VSV, Vesicular Stomatitis Virus ; RNP, ribonucleocapsid ; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate ; NTP, nucleoside triphosphates ; NTPase, nucleoside triphosphates phosphohydrolase. 0006-291X/79/090117-07$01.00/0 117
Copyright All rights
@ 1979
by Academic Press, Inc. in any form resewed.
of reproduction
Vol. 88, No. 1, 1979
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
tely. Viral envelope proteins were extracted following a modified procedure of Mac Sharry et al. (7). Purified virions at a concentration of = 0.5-1.0 mg of protein per ml in 0.01 M Tris buffer pH 7.6 were treated with Triton X-100 at a final concentration of 0.5%. The solubilized proteins were separated over a 20% glycerol cushion from the insoluble viral proteins by centrifugation (Spinco rotor SW 65, 1 h at 5' C, 45,000 rpm). The supernatant fluid was decanted : it constituted the G protein fraction. The pellet was resuspended in Tris 0.01 M, NaCl 1 M, pH 7.6, at a protein concentration of = 0.5-1.0 mg/ml and was treated with Triton X-100 at a final concentration of 0.5%. The supernatant fluid separated by the same centrifugation step as above, was decanted and thoroughly dialyzed against 0.01 M Tris buffer, pH 7.6 at 4' C. The material which precipitated during dialysis was collected by low speed centrifugation (Spinco rotor SW 65, 20 min at So C, 10,000 rpm) and resuspended in Tris buffer 0.01 M : this was the M protein fraction. In Vitro polymerase assay : The in Vitro polymerase reaction mixture consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 100 mM Na acetate, 100 mM K acetate, 8 mM Mg acetate, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 1.2 mM each of ATP, GTP and CTP, 0.12 mM of UTP and 0.004 mM c3~] IJTP (12 Ci/mmol). Triton X-LOO was added to a final concentration of 0.02%, when entire virions were to be tested. Viral material was present at a concentration of 0.250 mg/ml of whole virion proteins (or equivalent to for RNP cores), and the temperature of incubation was 30° C. The reaction was followed by measuring the amount of radioactivity in TCA insoluble material, each aliquot being in duplicate and each cpm value being corrected for the value measured at time 0 (= 500 cpm in 25 ~1). ATPase assay : The release of free 32Pi from [y-32~]ATP was measured by incubating the viral material and this nucleoside triphosphate (3,000 Ci/mmol) under the same conditions as described for the RNA polymerase assay, except for the absence of other unlabeled nucleoside triphosphates. Aliquots were removed at intervals during the course of incubation at 30° C and analyzed by ascending chromatography on 3MM Whatman paper. The paper was developed with a mixture of n-butanol, pyridine and ammonia 0.880 (40:20:40, v/v) at 28' C for 18 h. The ATP and free Pi were located by autoradiography of the chromatogram, then the 32P radioactivity of the corresponding spots was determined by Cherenkov counting. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The existence was first
suggested
dependence the
of an endogenous
sed above
by the observation
of the yield
reaction
which
a determined
and RNP core
Controls
of Triton
(data
not
shapes
value,
the VS virion
of an unexpected
virion
concentration
in Vitro
was not observed (3).
activities
This
was also
ruled
out
of the kinetic
curves
virions
the more rapidly
reached
differed
virion
in our effect
were
between experiments relevant
of was increaused in whole (Fig.
to the pre-
and not in the RNP cocktail that in many experiments
one another.
Fig.
1).
the
1 illustrates
RNA synthesis stimulated by RNP cores was always linearity appeared as soon as the concentration of
a precise
the curve
from
The inhibition
difference
observed
some trivial
(2).
of whole when RNP cores
striking
X-100 only in the virion assay it appeared shown). But, in addition,
such an example : whereas linear, a divergence from whole
in
when the concentration
range
were done which
sence
inhibitor
of RNA synthesized
occurred
the same concentration virion
transcriptase
bent
range.
The to a plateau.
118
more
concentrated This suggested
the virions a possible
were, li-
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 88, No. 1, 1979
Virions
. I 1250
RNP
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1
C
20
250
01
30 60 Time (min)
30 60 90
90
Fig. 1. Effect of viral protein concentrationson the in Vitro RNA synthesis stimulated by whole VS virions or RNP cores. In Vitro transcription reaction mixture (described in Materials and Methods) were prepared with virions or RNP cores at concentrations equivalent to 125 us/ml, 250 us/ml, 500 pg/ml and 1.25 mg/ml of whole virion proteins. The reactions were incubated in stoppered tubes at 30' C, and duplicate aliquots were removed from each reaction at 30, 60 and 90 min. Acid insoluble RNA was measured by scintillation spectrometry. Fig. 2. Comparative analysis of the proteins in whole virions (a), M protein fraction (b) and G protein fraction (c). M and G protein fractions, extracted as described in Materials and Methods, were samples of materials used in experiments illustrated by Fig. 3. Protein samples were precipitated overnight at 4O C by the addition of 2 volumes of ethanol and the pellets were dissolved in a solution of 62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8 with 1 M urea, 1% SDS and 1% mercaptoethanol. After boiling for 3 min the samples were subjected to electrophoresis on discontinuous Tris-glycine-buffered SDS-slab gel consisting of 10% resolving gel and 3% stacking gel according to Laemmli's procedure (12). Electrophoresis was from top to bottom. The protein bands were stained with Coomassie blue.
mitation cores
of substrates. under
In view
of the
the same conditions,
linear
the only
curves
available
be the disappearance
of NTP occurring
when the virions
It
VSV possesses
the location for
most
would
of which
viruses
which
be critical
for
reaction.
We therefore
conducted
to test
and M protein
fractions A sample
gel
might
that
be within
bud out
from
the demonstration paid
attention
the
viral
the host
as is
surface.
of an inhibitor to it
in
Its
the following
electrophoresis
and the
gel
was analyzed was stained
119
to
their (S),
the case presence
of the RNA polymerase
on the polymerase reaction, isolated from virions as described
of each fraction
seemed
have kept
envelope, cell
the RNP
a NTPase activity
the effect,
and Methods. slab
is known
for
explanation
membrane
components.
observed
experiments of the G protein in Materials
by SDS-polyacrylamide (Fig.
2).
The densitometer
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 88, No. 1, 1979
M protein
I
0
,G protein
30 60 (min)
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
$O
90
04
Time
(min)
Fig. 3. Effect of the addition of G or M protein fraction on the in Vi&O Identical 200 ~1 reaction mixtures were each RNA synthesis by VSV-RNP cores. prepared with fresh RNP cores equivalent tc5Oug of whole virion proteins. One sample served as control and did not receive M or G protein fraction with the M protein fraction (res(curve 0). Three samples were supplemented pectively 10, 30 and 100 pg per assay) and 2 samples with the G protein Incorporation of ["H] UTP into acid prefraction (10 and 20 Vg per assay). cipitable RNA was determined as described in Fig. 1. The dotted curve (Gal was obtained in another experiment in which the G protein fraction (25 pg) did not exhibit any effect on the reaction. Fig. 4. ATPase activity in different protein fractions extracted from rions. Three equivalent(200 ~1) reaction mixtures were prepared on the and no other of the RNA polymerase reaction, but containing [y- 32P]ATP cleoside triphosphate. One sample contained VSV-RNP (equivalent to 50 the second contained 20 pg of the G protein of whole virion proteins), tion and the third 20 pg of the M protein fraction. During incubation aliquots were removed at intervals and subjected to paper chromatography autoradiography as described in Materials and Methods. The percentage over the totality of label recovered was recorded. C3' P 3 phosphate
VS vibasis nuug fracat 30° C and of
traces
us to
corresponding
estimate Fig.
that
3 illustrates
merase
reaction.
results
were
was depressed protein for
to the electropherogram
the M protein
reaction illustrates
the results Concerning
always
of their
unequivocally
of time
(data
95% pure
not
addition
enabled >98%
to RNP cores
in
pure.
the poly-
of the M protein fraction, the reaction clear-cut : the RNA polymerase
of inhibition
followed
Moreover,
the kinetic
examined.
On the other
the increase
curves hand,
were various
with
the G protein fraction : either no effect or various degree of inhibition was observed, an experiment
shown)
and the G protein
the addition
and the degree
concentration.
the period
obtained
was >
in which
the
G protein
120
fraction
strictly results
of the M linear were
on the polymerase occurred.Fig. 3 exhibited
a strong
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 88, No. 1, 1979
inhibitory
effect
plateau.
presence account
complex.
(8)
which
acted
Fig.
4 that
fraction ver,
for
by splitting
the NTPase activity
and,
in contrast,
we noticed,
to a decreased
sis
measured
results
to the addition
the slope
of the curve
contrary,
in a polymerase
by comparison
in
the polymerase
of
with
in which
C” 1 H
Howein
the
with
reaction
or without
mixture
a diminution
to the presence argued
polymerase
for
complex for
a direct
data
tion
to the RNP cores
bovine
serum
2'min,
modified
inhibition
this
of a NTPase activity
leading
tary
nor
HeLa cells
with
because were
a restriction
in the presence
enzymic
not degraded
activities
the M protein
on the RNP
neither
the addi-
VSV proteins,
i.e.
at 100"
Secondly,
not appear
VSV mRNAs extracted when added
effect
Complemen-
heated
did
fracVitro
In contrast,
fraction
reaction.
fraction
the
to be lin-
from
to a polymerase
C for
wild
type
assay
in
fraction. of the in Vitro
of the M protein directly
in
6. First,
VSV polymerase
fraction.
such as NTPase or RNAse in acted
We therefore
activity.
of Mprotein
purified
On the
the presence
the fraction.
to the
of the polymerase
alone,
of the G protein
in Fig.
5
was observed
sample.
of its
unrelated
the M protein
of the M protein
In conclusion,
given
the addition
the kinetics
in
of the M protein
of a protein
ked to a ribonuclease, the presence
effect are
Fig.
was perfor-
an artifactual in
to an attenuation
assumption
albumine,
obtained
was rather
synthe-
pre-incubation.
pre-incubated
after
would
the
incubation.
of the RNA synthesis addition
the
cocktail with
a 40 min-incubation
complex
that
reaction
0 of the
observed
observed
fraction. of activity
UTP. In the case of the RNP cores
was identical
fraction,
at time
effect
infected
RNP
the M protein
by comparison
to the RNP polymerase data
from
levels
companion
related
of free
One can see in
the G protein
the not pre-incubated
concluded
that
in
of Roy and
containing
proteins.
various
of RNA synthesized
of an experiment
of the G protein
ble
fraction
when [" H ] CJTP was added
shows the
all
hiqh
which
NTPase activities
absent
experiments,
amount
med prior
tion
the results
mixture
was virtually
the
fraction,
the release
envelope
for
fraction, even an absence. If the degradation of NTP was responthe inhibitory effect of the G protein fraction, then pre-incubation
at 30“ C of the G protein lead
since the four
reaction
viral
especially
on repeated
we looked
a
on the polymerase
We followed
the polymerase
each of the
above,
effect
was checked, the y-Pi.
seem to reach
the M or G protein
enzyme bearing
only in
in
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
the curves
reported
inhibitory
activity
a unique
and without
G protein sible for
apparent
the ATPase
from [y-32 P]ATP with
that
of the observations
an only
argued
cores
be noticed
of a NTPase activity
for
Only
Bishop 32Pi
can also
On the basis
possible would
; it
AND BIOPHYSICAL
on the polymerase
121
activity
The absence this fraction complex
was
of detectasuggested
and attenuated
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 88, No. 1, 1979
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
IRNP RlfPi D-
:
l
I 0
30
4
4
I
P
I’
I
_
-3” c
f
00
06
90 120
0
5 TIME
306090
(min)
TIME
(min)
30
60
90
Fig. 5. Effect of a pre-incubation of the G protein fraction on the RNA polymerase assay. Four polymerase reaction mixtures (200 ul) were each prepared with RNP equivalent to 50 ug of whole virion proteins. To two samples, 20 ug of the G protein fraction were added. One sample with only RNP (RNPi) and one sample with G (Gi) were incubated at 30' C for 40 min prior to the addition of [3H]HTP (+). The two other reaction samples (RNP and G) were incubated immediately after the addition of the radioactive precursor as usual. Fig. 6. Control experiments of the in Vitro RNA polymerase reaction. Reac-mixtures (200 ~1) were each prepared with VSV-RNP e uivalent to 50 ug of whole virion proteins. One sample did not receive ["H ‘I UTP but 25,OOG cpm of r3n]uridine labeled purified mRNA isolated from HeLa cells infected with VSV wild type : aliquots (40 ~1) removed at intervals, were TCA precipitated to follow a possible degradation of the radioactive RNA. Other samples served to determine the incorporation of [3H]HTP as usual. Two samples were independent controls (RNP), another received 30 ug of fresh M protein fraction (i M), another received 30 ug of the M protein fraction boiled for 2 min prior to its addition (+ heated M), the last one received 30 ug of bovine serum albumin (+ BSA).
its
efficiency.
syntheses trated
Vitro
is
to the
the in Vitro reaction.
thors
(2,
envelope occasionally
protein
The M protein However,
and which hamper
observations
the
ts defect
(9,
of VSV infected
of the 4).
M
by our (1)
if).
and in ViVo results
in the cytoplasm
the inhibition
supported
by ts mutants
to be linked
between act
This
induced
appears
thus
VSV transcriptase the NTPase activity
together
the in Vitro
polymerase
122
the
in a similar far
reaction
was solubilized
that
which with
ViUo
RNA
has been demons-
the good agreement
Moreover,
suggest
cells
on the in of which
protein
M
would
way as in the in
as the best
candidate
for
detected
by various
au-
in the
VSV
was present the G protein
reaction.
Since
may also we always
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 88, No. 1, 1979
observed
a good correlation
G protein
fraction
polymerase bit
the in Vitro
glycoproteins
we conclude polymerase
from
the strong
inhibitory
tion
previously
reported
the NTPase activity various
a true
intrinsic
packed
during
was not
degrees virion
the cell procedure,
remains
thought role
it
of
currently
the mechanism
rather
of virions.
favors
the presence
that
on the nature
investigation.
of the inhibition,
a virion
This
aspect
be reported
of the
it
not
be
reaction,
we
or our pu-
The important envelope also
as well
of the RNAs synthesized
will
case,
was present,
stocks,
might
in Vitro
be
reac-
as such an activity
virus
VSV protein, complex
might
contaminant
of the activity.
a structural
transcriptase
it
conceivably
be a cellular
our
inhiof
In our
on the polymerase
growing
is now demonstrated
of the
and when it therefore However,
working
used for
the M protein under
might
strain
to ours,
on the polymerase
detected, but
on the does not
of preparation
similar
fraction
in the
to a NTPase activity.
: it
process
up to now to be only
at the level
The effect is
that
regularly
by authors
fraction by itself
the procedure
was related
component,
the budding
of this
was essentially of this
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of NTPase acticity
the G protein Since
of activity
suppose rification
virus (5),
been noticed
point
of effect that
effect
has scarcely that
the absence
reaction.
Sendai
that
showed
between
and the absence
reaction,
AND BIOPHYSICAL
work,
which
protein, play
a
as in ViVo. in Vitro deals
with
elsewhere.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS : This work was supported in part by grants from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (L.A. no 136) and the Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale Francaise. We would like to thank Dr. J.C. PATTE for helpful discussions of the data presented in this report. Note added in proof : During the preparation results of A. Carroll and R. Wagner (in press) with ours.
of the manuscript we learnt which are in good agreement
REFERENCES 1. Martinet, C., Combard, A., Printz-Ane, C. and Printz, P. (1979). J. Virol. (in press). 2. Perrault, J. and Kingsbury, D.W. (1974). Nature 248, 45-47. 3. Breindl, M. and Holland, J.J. (1976). Virology 73, 106-118. 4. Carrel, A.R. and Wagner, R.R. (1978). J. Biol. Chem. 253, 3361-3363. 5. Marx, P.A., Portner, A. and Kingsbury, D.W. (1974). J. Virol. 13, 107-112. 6. Printz And, C., Combard, A. and Martinet, C. (1972). J. Virol. 10, 889-895. 7. MC Sharry, J-J., Compans, R.W., Lackland, H. and Choppin, P.W. (1975). Virology 67, 365-374. 8. Roy, P. and Bishop, D.H.L. (1971). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 235, 191-206. 9. Lafay, F. (1971). J. Gen. Virol. 13, 449-453. 10. Lafay, F. (1974). J. Virol. 14, 1220-1228. 11. Knipe, D.M., Lodish, H.F. and Baltimore, D. (1977). J. Virol. 21, 1140-1148. 12. Laemmli, U.K. (1970). Nature 227, 680-685.
123