Insulin resistance, diabetes and cognitive function: Consequences for preventative strategies

Insulin resistance, diabetes and cognitive function: Consequences for preventative strategies

Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181 Review Insulin resistance, diabetes and cognitive function: Consequences for preventative strategies I. Bour...

221KB Sizes 0 Downloads 26 Views

Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181

Review

Insulin resistance, diabetes and cognitive function: Consequences for preventative strategies I. Bourdel-Marchasson b,∗ , E. Lapre c , H. Laksir a,b , E. Puget a,b a CHU of Bordeaux, Department of Gerontology, Bordeaux, France UMR 5536 CNRS, University V.-Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France c Laboratory of Psychology EA 4139, University V.-Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France b

Received 22 March 2010; accepted 24 March 2010 Available online 15 May 2010

Abstract Cognitive decline and dementia both place a heavy burden on patients and their relatives, and any means of preventing such age-related changes are worthy of consideration. Those who have the metabolic syndrome with or without diabetes suffer more often from dysexecutive problems and slower psychomotor speed than do other patients. In epidemiological studies, diabetes has appeared to be a risk factor for all types of dementia, including vascular dementia, although the role of the metabolic syndrome in the risk of Alzheimer’s disease is still a matter of debate. The possible mechanisms of cognitive alterations are multiple, and may differ according to age group and duration of diabetes or the metabolic syndrome. Drug interventional trials addressing the prevention of cognitive decline through action on the metabolic syndrome are disappointing-albeit scarce at this time. Lifestyle interventions in middle-aged or younger-elderly subjects should also be implemented in the general population. © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Keywords: Cognitive disorders; Dysexecutive syndrome; Insulin resistance; Preventative interventions

Résumé Insulinorésistance, diabète et troubles cognitifs : quelles conséquences pour les stratégies préventives ?. Le déclin cognitif et les syndromes démentiels représentent un lourd poids pour les patients et leur famille. Toute possibilité d’action préventive de ces troubles doit être étudiée. Les patients porteurs d’un syndrome métabolique avec ou sans diabète souffrent plus souvent de syndromes dysexécutifs et de ralentissement de la vitesse mentale que les personnes qui en sont dépourvues. Au travers des études épidémiologiques, le diabète apparaît comme un facteur de risque de démences de tout type et de démences vasculaires. Le rôle du syndrome métabolique dans l’apparition de la démence d’Alzheimer reste débattu. Les mécanismes à l’origine des altérations cognitives sont multiples et peuvent différer selon les groupes d’âge, ainsi que selon la durée d’évolution du syndrome métabolique ou du diabète. Les essais médicamenteux visant à réduire le déclin cognitif en agissant sur le syndrome métabolique sont décevants, mais à ce jour ils sont encore rares. Des interventions sur le style de vie chez des personnes d’âge moyen ou chez les plus jeunes des personnes âgées devraient être testées dans des essais de grande taille. © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. Mots clés : Troubles cognitifs ; Syndrome dysexécutif ; Insulinorésistance ; Interventions préventives

1. Introduction Both dementia and non-dementia cognitive disorders are now the main target of preventative strategies due to their heavy bur∗

Corresponding author. Geriatric Department, hôpital Xavier-Arnozan, 33604 Pessac cedex France. Tel.: +33 5 57 65 65 71; fax: +33 5 57 65 65 60. E-mail address: [email protected] (I. Bourdel-Marchasson). 1262-3636/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2010.03.001

den on quality of life and their major social impact on patients themselves, as well as on their relatives and familial caregivers. Indeed, once these disorders are established, drug treatments are only able to slow the decline in some cases. In France, dementia prevalence in those aged greater than 75 years was estimated to be 17.8% [1], while diabetes mellitus in people aged greater than 65 years is around 10% [2], with a peak incidence of 14% in those aged 75–79 years. Any effective means of preventing cognitive decline and dementia are currently avidly sought, particularly in the form of primary prevention linked to lifestyle.

174

I. Bourdel-Marchasson et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181

Whether or not diabetes is an independent risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is still a matter of debate, with both positive [3–7] and negative [8–10] findings in longitudinal epidemiological studies across different populations. Some studies have shown an increased risk of vascular dementia, but not AD, in patients with diabetes [9,11]. In fact, there may be an increased risk of any type of dementia–not only AD and vascular dementia-in patients with diabetes, although the causal mechanisms remain clinically uncertain [12,13]. Modulation of the risk of AD [14] induced by diabetes may be different in carriers of the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE ε4) allele, a major vascular risk factor for AD [15]. In the Personnes âgées Quid (PAQUID) study, there was no association between diabetes and AD (unpublished data) and it was, therefore, hypothesized that the PAQUID cohort lacked the power to detect a positive result; it has since been suggested that a cohort of greater than 600 diabetic patients and a greater number of dementia diagnoses are necessary to assess the influence of diabetes [16]. Post-mortem neuropathological studies are, however, not supportive of a causal relationship between diabetes and AD. It has been shown and discussed in an extensive review that cerebrovascular pathology was more frequent-and AD-related pathology less frequent-in those with diabetes than in others [17]. On the other hand, vascular dementia may be more frequent in people with diabetes. The progression to dementia after stroke was increased in subjects with diabetes compared

with others [18–20], and the post-stroke improvement of cognitive function was observed less often in patients with diabetes [21]. In the Three Cities study, diabetes or high levels of triglycerides, but not the other features of the metabolic syndrome, were found to be risk factors for all types of dementia and vascular dementia, but not AD [10]. It is now suggested that vascular risk factors may have a strong influence not only on vascular dementia, but on the occurrence of AD as well. Hypertension in mid-life has been shown to be a risk factor for AD although, in the 2 years before a clinical diagnosis of AD, blood pressure tends to decrease and the best cognitive performances have been seen in those with the highest blood pressure [22]. APOE ε4 is a known risk factor for AD, yet the frequency of this phenotype does not appear to be either more or less frequent in those with diabetes [23]. Also, the insulinresistance syndrome was associated with AD in a cross-sectional study [24], but not in a longitudinal one [25]. The cognitive functions explored in this report are heterogeneous, and the variety of tests used to assess these functions render any analyses complex. Typically, the cognitive domains examined are memory (declarative, semantic, short-term and verbal), executive functions (attention capacity, mental flexibility, inhibition and updating) and processing speed. In addition, cognitive capacities are often evaluated as part of the global or general cognitive functioning (for example, by the Mini-Mental Status Examination [MMSE]) (Table 1). All aspects of such cog-

Table 1 Summary of the cognitive functions examined in this review and the main results according to the metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Cognitive functions

Tests

The metabolic syndrome and its associated components

Diabetes

Global cognitive function

MMSE

Cross-sectional studies Impairment [75,82–86,88,89,97] Unchanged [78] Longitudinal studies Predictive factor [95] Not a predictive factor [99]

Cross-sectional studies Impairment [2,28]

Memory Declarative

Cross-sectional study: Impairment [29] Cross-sectional study Impairment [30] Longitudinal study Impairment [42] No change according to glycaemic index of food ingested [72]

Semantic Verbal

Paragraph or word-list recall

Short-term

Immediate recall

Executive functions and attention

DSST

Cross-sectional study Impairment [80]

Cross-sectional studies Impairment [31,32] Longitudinal study Impairment [41]

Cross-sectional study Impairment [80]

Cross-sectional studies Impairment [31,32] Longitudinal studies Impairment [41,42] Longitudinal study Impairment [43]

TMT-B Processing speed

DSST

Unchanged [26,27] Longitudinal studies Impairment [41] Unchanged [45]

Verbal fluency DSST: Digital symbol substitution test; TMT-B: Trail Making Test Part B; MMSE: Mini-Mental Status Examination.

I. Bourdel-Marchasson et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181

nitive dimensions are used to differentiate cognitive changes, starting from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) which refers to a subtle, but measurable, memory disorder greater than normally expected with ageing-up to dementia. The present review aims to explore the possible influence of the metabolic syndrome in individuals with or without diabetes on the risk of cognitive decline. In particular, the possibility of preventative strategies is also explored. 2. Non-dementia cognitive impairment in elderly people with diabetes Diabetes has also been studied as a risk factor for nondementia cognitive impairment (Table 1). Although numerous cross-sectional studies failed to show any effect of diabetes on cognitive function [26,27], we found in the Three Cities study (9000 subjects aged greater than 65 years) a significant decrease in MMSE score–a measure of global cognitive functioning–in subjects with both diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes compared with the others [2]. Another study of similar size (greater than 7000 subjects) found a baseline association of cognitive impairment in patients with diabetes as well as in those with impaired fasting glycaemia compared with other subjects [28]. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study demonstrated, in middle-aged patients with diabetes, reduced hippocampal and prefrontal volumes associated with impaired declarative memory compared with those without diabetes [29]. Semantic memory was also specifically affected in elderly people with diabetes [30]. Executive functions and processing speed were impaired in those with diabetes compared with other subjects, with increased problems in those with either undiagnosed diabetes or diabetes duration greater than 15 years [31]. Such impairment of executive functioning and psychomotor speed was confirmed in another cross-sectional study, which also showed no influence according to age group in elderly subjects [32]. When global cognitive functioning was tested in 378 high-functioning elderly subjects (aged 70–79 years) treated for diabetes in the Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study, the relationship between cognitive function and fasting glycaemia was U-shaped, with the lowest performances in those with the recommended values of blood glucose and in those with values greater than 2.75 g/L. This relationship was not found with HbA1c [33]. In the younger (mean age 62.5 years) population of the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes-memory in Diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) study, a crude negative association was found between general functioning, as measured by MMSE, and higher HbA1c values. However, after multiple adjustments for cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes duration and social factors, this relationship was no longer significant. Indeed, the only function impaired by higher HbA1c values in the fully adjusted model was processing speed, as measured by the digit symbol substitution test (DSST) [34]. Obesity may modulate the relationship between diabetes and cognitive impairment. In a cross-sectional study exploring middle-aged people (mean age 60 years) with and without diabetes, hippocampal volume was inversely related to body mass

175

index (BMI) [29]. One small-scale study also showed that obesity increased the rate of changes in cognitive function in those with diabetes [35]. It has also been hypothesized that physical activity may be able to reduce the deleterious effects of diabetes on cognitive function, based on a cross-sectional study that found a relationship between light-to-moderate exercise and better cognitive functioning [36]. However, as these effects could have been due to other confounding factors, it is necessary to test the effects of diet and exercise in patients with diabetes in an interventional study. Patients with diabetes may be at higher risk of MCI, as confirmed by several studies [37,38], although the rate of progression from MCI to overt dementia has not been investigated. In patients with diabetes, MCI may be associated with diabetes duration greater than 10 years, age at diabetes onset less than 65 years, use of insulin for treatment [37], high blood pressure and brain atrophy [39,40]. However, the association of diabetes and cognitive changes has been better explored in longitudinal studies (Table 1). In the elderly female cohort of the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture Research Group, diabetes was associated with a 3-year higher risk of cognitive decline, independent of vascular and sociodemographic risk factors [41]. Interestingly, the risk of cognitive decline was greatest for diabetes duration of at least 15 years and was seen in all of the following tests: short-form MMSE (global functioning); DSST (attention, psychomotor performance and perceptual organization); and Trail Making Test Part B (TMTB; attention, visual scanning, sequential abilities and executive functioning). The Vascular Aging Study examined the cognitive evolution of cognitively “healthy” subjects (aged 59–71 years), according to glucose categories (normal, impaired fasting glucose and diabetes) and extensive psychometric testing [42]. Those with diabetes worsened in tasks involving attention, psychomotor speed and short-term memory (immediate recall) compared with other categories. Adjustment for vascular risk factors did not modify the relationship, although adjustment for BMI clearly weakened it. Only a slower psychomotor speed remained significantly predicted by diabetes. Similarly, in the Rancho Bernard Study of aging, a 4-year cognitive decline was found more frequently in the presence of diabetes, but only in women and in the verbal-fluency test, a task that requires psychomotor speed, according to the authors [43]. Baseline HbA1c values correlated with the follow-up test, but not the baseline test. After logistic-regression analysis, the relationship between diabetes and impairment in the verbal-fluency test was not weakened by either BMI or blood pressure, but by baseline HbA1c and lipids. However, this study may not have had sufficient power due to the small number of subjects with diabetes (118 out of 1000). In a 4-year follow-up of 1983, post-menopausal women (mean age 67.2 years, 53 with diagnosed diabetes), a one-point increase in baseline HbA1c value was associated with MCI or dementia incidence [44] while, in another longitudinal study of a population of 1789 elderly subjects with a high rate of diabetes (32.7%), baseline diabetes was not predictive of 2-year cognitive decline [45].

176

I. Bourdel-Marchasson et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181

Although severe hypoglycaemia can induce encephalopathy with typical white-matter injury [46], the role of hypoglycaemia in the incidence of cognitive impairment is still unclear. Among older people with diabetes, the occurrence of severe hypoglycaemia was not related to the incidence of cognitive impairment. However, dementia was a strong predictor of severe hypoglycaemia [47], and a much larger study has suggested a role for severe hypoglycaemia in the 4-year incidence of any type of dementia [48]. In summary, elderly people with diabetes appear to have a higher rate of dysexecutive syndrome and a slower psychomotor speed. However, the respective roles of glucose variations and components of the metabolic syndrome are not fully understood. On the other hand, both of these cognitive alterations may play an important role in the management of the disease–whether by the patients themselves or with the help of their caregivers [49]–and in the overall quality of life. 2.1. Insulin and cognition With normal physiology, insulin facilitates memory, as demonstrated when administered in optimal doses and with sufficient glucose availability. However, insulin resistance, a condition that impairs insulin function, may reverse this effect. A positive relationship has been shown on MRI between whole-brain and hippocampal volumes and the area under the curve (AUC) in post-glucose tolerance tests for insulin and glucose in early-stage AD patients, but not in non-dementia subjects [50]. In this study, the insulin AUC was also associated with better cognitive performance. Thus, this study confirmed previous similar findings [51]. AD has been called “type 3 diabetes” because a defect in insulin signalling is associated with the accumulation of pathological ␤-amyloid peptide (A␤) and hyperphosphorylated tau protein. IDE (insulin-degrading enzyme) is a protease involved in the degradation of A␤, and insulin and A␤ may compete for degradation. IDE expression found in the post-mortem hippocampus of AD patients who expressed the APOE ε4 allele was reduced by 50% compared with ε4 in AD patients and controls [52]. A genetic association between IDE polymorphism and AD is still being debated in light of the conflicting results [53,54], and it has been suggested that IDE may be related to dementia risk through an increase in insulin rather than the IDE polymorphism itself [55]. However, a recent report on the post-mortem brains of 700 diabetic patients could find no differences in the load of A␤, neuritic plaques or neurofibrillary tangles, which were, in contrast, higher in the brains of APOE ε4 carriers [56], confirming previous findings [57] in a small population. Oxidative stress and microinflammation mediate insulin resistance in the brain through the pathway of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and, thus, omega-3 fatty acids may also be protective [58]. 2.2. Nutriment administration and cognitive function An acute glucose load was shown to improve memory performance in both healthy and AD elderly subjects without diabetes

across numerous previously published reports [59–65]. In contrast, in patients with diabetes, acute ingestion of carbohydrates has been shown to impair declarative memory (paragraph or word-list delayed recall), but had no effect on executive functions [66]. However, this was not confirmed by either 90-min high-glycaemic (10 mmol/L) or euglycaemic clamp testing [67]. Thus, the influence of glucose metabolism status on the acute effects of an oral glucose load has been assessed. Kaplan et al. [68] found, in 20 healthy elderly subjects, that poor ␤-cell function, low BMI, good insulin sensitivity and larger post-meal glucose AUC were associated with baseline decreased cognitive performance. On the other hand, in the same group of subjects, poor ␤-cell function and poor baseline memory performance were both associated with improvements in memory performance after ingesting 50 g of carbohydrates (glucose, potatoes or barley) compared with placebo. The memory-enhancing effects of these carbohydrates were independent of their effect on plasma glucose [68]. Similar conclusions were drawn from a larger study involving subjects with a wider age range (55–84 years) [69]. Also, Kaplan et al. [70] performed further studies with fat, protein and glucose intakes, and observed improvements in cognitive performance in 22 healthy elderly subjects for all nutriments, independent of their effects on blood glucose concentrations. Another recent study found that subjects with better glucose tolerance performed better on working memory and attention testing than did others, and that post-prandial cognitive improvement was better with low glycaemic index (GI) foods than with high GI ones [71]. However, in 21 patients with diabetes, low GI foods were also associated with poorer postprandial verbal memory performance, but not with changes in the other cognitive tasks that were tested (TMT-B, forward digit span, attention) [72]. Among the diabetic women in the US Nurses’ Health Studies, higher dietary intake of trans fatty acids after the diagnosis of diabetes was associated with an accelerated decline in global cognitive function-in particular, verbal memory-independent of age, other items of dietary intake, education, diabetes treatment, BMI, diabetes duration and physical activity [73]. 2.3. Brain and hippocampus changes in diabetes and the metabolic syndrome Several diseases-namely, AD, diabetes and infarcts could affect the hippocampal region through different pathogenic mechanisms. In its preclinical stage, AD involved atrophy of the anterior part of the hippocampus, and progression of the disease was associated with progressive atrophy towards the posterior region [74]. Insulin resistance was shown to be negatively associated with right hippocampal volume and overall cognitive function in a group of middle-aged women without diabetes [75]. However, in apparently healthy elderly people, silent brain infarcts were more prevalent in those with the metabolic syndrome, and the main component linked to these abnormalities was–as expected–elevated blood pressure [76]. Diabetes has been associated with hippocampal atrophy [51]. In a non-dementia population, diabetes and infarcts induced global hippocampal dysfunction: with diabetes, changes mainly

I. Bourdel-Marchasson et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181

involved the dentate gyrus (head of the hippocampus) and entorhinal cortex; with infarcts, the cornu ammonis 1 (CA1) and subiculum regions were more affected. In the whole study population, blood glucose levels were inversely correlated with dentate gyrus cerebral blood volume (CBV), assessed by functional MRI (fMRI) in the brain, whereas a trend towards an inverse relationship between insulin level and entorhinal CBV was observed. This was especially seen in those with infarcts in the hippocampal vascular territory, and was not observed in those with no infarcts. On the other hand, CA1 dysfunction resulted to large-vessel occlusions and subsequent hippocampal hypoperfusion, as shown by CBV mapping in vivo [77]. Thus, the main anatomical alterations related to diabetes appear to be the consequence of elevated blood glucose, and changes due to cerebral infarcts are linked to hyperinsulinaemia as a vascular risk factor. However, in contradiction to these statements, hippocampal volume was positively associated with the metabolic syndrome, and with visceral fat volume in particular, in a group of 48 middle-aged to elderly nondementia patients with diabetes [78]. Among these subjects, the metabolic syndrome was not associated with any cognitive alterations. 3. Cognitive alterations in the metabolic syndrome The Rotterdam Study showed a positive relationship between the current post-load insulin concentration and cognitive performance independent of other cardiovascular risk factors, but only in women aged greater than 55 years. This relationship persisted even after exclusion of women with diabetes or cardiovascular disease [79]. The profile of cognitive changes observed in those with the metabolic syndrome was similar to that observed in diabetes, and was characterized by decreased psychomotor speed and alterations in executive function [80] (Table 1), thereby suggesting that the cognitive decline in people with diabetes can develop during the first phase of the disease and mainly in relation to cardiovascular risk factors [81]. Obesity and markers of visceral fat were associated with a decrease in cognitive functions, although physical activity reduced the strength of the relationship [82]. In subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, lower MMSE scores have also been found. In particular, higher insulin levels-both fasting and 2-h values-and age were both risk factors for lower MMSE scores [83,84]. The Invecchiare in Chianti ([InCHIANTI]; ageing in the Chianti Region) study (523 subjects, aged 70–90 years) showed that, in people with insulin-resistance syndrome, cognitive changes were found only in those with clinical signs of subcortical alteration [85]. In a stroke-free Brazilian population in which 40% of subjects had the metabolic syndrome, the latter was associated with cognitive decline as well as other clinical conditions related to unsuccessful ageing, such as depression, falls, impaired balance and slow gait speed [86]. Association of the metabolic syndrome with cognitive impairment, however, was not found in elderly Koreans, irrespective from their APOE4 genotype. Nevertheless, the authors did find a significant interactive effect between decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

177

(HDL-C) or triglycerides and the APOE ε4 allele on cognitive impairment [87]. Longitudinal studies have addressed the effects of increased fasting and post-load insulin, and decreased insulin secretion (Table 1). In one cohort, hyperinsulinaemia was associated with impaired baseline cognitive function and subsequent cognitive decline after 4 years [88]. In women aged 65–79 years included in an anti-osteoporosis trial, the rate of cognitive decline was accelerated depending on the presence of components-alone and in combination-of the metabolic syndrome [89]. In a community-based cohort of 683 elderly subjects, the 5-year incidence of dementia was associated with baseline hyperinsulinaemia, diabetes, obesity and hypertension, with an increased risk in the upper third and fourth quartiles of fasting insulin. After adjusting the multivariate model for APOE ε4 or for diabetes, it was found that BMI, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, hypertension, heart disease and stroke had no affect on the risk of hyperinsulinaemia [90]. However, the association was more pronounced in carriers of the APOE ε4 allele. In the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study (HAAS), which included only men, an increased risk of dementia was found in the lowest 15th and upper 15th percentiles of fasting insulin [91]. In the younger-old women without diabetes in the Nurses’ Health Study, the 4-year cognitive decline was faster in those with increased insulin secretion (fasting C-peptide concentration), independent of other vascular risk factors, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular disease [92]. The authors further analyzed the relationship between fasting insulin and C-peptide and cognitive decline in these women, and found that the group with low C-peptide and high insulin had a greater risk than those with low C-peptide and low insulin [93]. The authors suggest that this might have been a reflection of impaired insulin degradation and, thus, an impairment of IDE function. They also estimated that being in the upper quartile for fasting C-peptide was equivalent to being 3 years older [92], and that being in the group with low Cpeptide combined with high insulin was equivalent to being 5 years older, for cognitive status [93]. In a study of Swedish men followed from age 50 years, low baseline insulin secretion was associated with a 30-year increased risk of AD, particularly in those carrying the APOE ε4 allele. Also, in the latter subjects, higher fasting insulin or insulin resistance, according to the homoeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index, was predictive of incident AD [94]. In non-diabetic subjects, vascular dementia was predicted by insulin resistance at 50 years of age. Obesity was predictive of a 2-year decline in the composite cognitive scores of subjects in the US Framingham Heart Study in a multivariate model, adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, and social and educational factors-but only in men [95]. The authors also found an interaction between obesity and gender, and the different patterns of obesity observed in men and women were proposed as a possible explanation of this gender difference, although a lack of power in this study is also possible. A healthcare cohort of around 1000 subjects who surfaced after an active search for dementia and other chronic diseases, and who were anthropometrically characterized at ages 40–45 years, showed that obesity was an independent risk factor for dementia 30 years later, but only in women [96]. However, in this report,

178

I. Bourdel-Marchasson et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181

the respective mortality rates and causes of attrition in women and men according to their build were not shown. Hypertension has also been found to increase the risk of cognitive disorders 20 years later, particularly in men [97]. The effect of the insulin-resistance syndrome on cognitive function may also be modulated by low-grade inflammation, which further increases the risk of cognitive decline [98]. All of these studies involved middle-aged or younger-old subjects, whereas the Leiden 85-Plus Study involved a cohort that specifically included only the oldest-old. Within such a population, the risk of cognitive decline was not increased in those who had features of the metabolic syndrome [99]. Furthermore, the decline was slower in those aged 85–90 years with the metabolic syndrome compared with the others. Other evidence suggests that the metabolic syndrome in this age group does not have the same significance it has in younger people [100]. Another intriguing finding in the Health ABC Study was the lesser cognitive decline found in those in the highest tertile of leptin concentrations compared with those in the lowest tertile. The association was strongest after adjusting for fat mass [101]. The authors suggest that leptin may act as a neurotrophic factor and could therefore be a protective factor. In summary, multiple arguments favour the metabolic syndrome and diabetes as risk factors for cognitive decline in middle-aged and younger-old subjects. Thus, it follows that the interventions aiming to improve the effects on cognitive decline of components of the metabolic syndrome or blood glucose control in this age group are of major interest. 4. Interventions Improving blood glucose control could reverse the cognitive problems associated with diabetes. In one small-scale study, a global intervention to improve glucose control in patients with diabetes resulted in an improvement in psychomotor speed and attention in association with changes in HbA1c [102]. A pilot study showed improvement in verbal memory after 24 weeks of either rosiglitazone or glyburide together with improvement in fasting glycaemia [103]. However, in patients with diabetes, the large randomized, controlled trial (action in diabetes and vascular disease [ADVANCE]: Preterax and Diamicron MR controlled evaluation), which aimed to tightly control blood glucose, showed no preventative effect of the intensive therapy on cognitive status [104]. Unfortunately, there are no data on the cognitive evolution of subjects in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), who were followed from the onset of their disease, as they were middle-aged for 30 years. Drugs that can increase sensitivity to insulin, such as troglitazone, may have a neurotrophic effect. A preliminary trial of rosiglitazone in early-stage AD or amnestic MCI has shown an effect of the treatment on attention and memory after 6 months [105]. In patients with mild-to-moderate AD, a second study showed improvement in Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scalecognitive (ADAS-cog), but only in non-carriers of the APOE ε4 allele [106]. However, the presentation at the June 2009 International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease (ICAD) of the negative results of a large 6-month study of mild-to-moderate

AD and rosiglitazone, irrespective to APOE phenotype, led to the termination of all such ongoing trials. Controlling for lipid profile might also play a role in the prevention of cognitive decline. However, the risk attributed to such changes may differ according to age group. In 185 oldest-old, non-dementia subjects without the APOE ε4 allele, higher levels of total or LDL cholesterol were associated with better cognitive function [107]. Some of the large clinical trials using statin therapy included ancillary studies looking into the effects of treatment on cognitive function. Pravastatin taken by elderly subjects with cardiovascular disease, or an increased risk for such disease, did not modify the course of cognitive function in any way during a 4-year follow-up [108]. However, statins prescribed to those with cerebral white-matter lesions might decrease the rate of their progressive worsening, but only in those with severe changes. Cognitive alterations and other geriatric syndromes related to white-matter changes, but the clinical usefulness of statins for these indications was not assessed in the trial [109]. The systolic hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial has shown a 2-year preventative effect on AD of lowering systolic blood pressure in elderly patients (greater than 60 years) with the use of a calcium antagonist [110]. However, this effect has not been confirmed in other trials, as described in the extensive Cochrane review by McGuinness et al. [111]. However, a pilot 2-year, uncontrolled, lifestyle intervention has shown promising effects. The intervention consisted of exercise two to four times a week and healthy-diet training every 6 months, and was applied only to older patients with diabetes, but without drug treatment, and to those with impaired glucose tolerance (mean age 80 years). At baseline, these subjects had poorer cognition than those with normal glucose tolerance, according to MMSE scores and delayed-recall testing. Yet, after 2 years, cognitive function was similar across all three-study groups [112]. In summary, interventions targeting one or two components of the metabolic syndrome, or hyperglycaemia when diabetes is present, in middle-aged or young elderly subjects can modulate the decline in cognitive function associated with those factors. However, in general, the reports of interventional trials are not encouraging, and better definition of the studied populations (age group, other risk factors) and/or interventional strategies are needed. 5. Conclusion Patients with the metabolic syndrome, with or without diabetes, invariably suffer from cognitive decline. However, the mechanisms of these changes are manifold, differ according to age group and disease duration, and are modulated by the APOE4 phenotype. It is possible that the cognitive alterations observed in diabetes were present before the onset of diabetes as a result of the metabolic syndrome. Regardless, such cognitive alterations can interfere with disease management. Once diabetes is diagnosed, the effects of blood variations on cognitive decline may involve different pathways from those caused by the metabolic syndrome. Consequently, at this time, it is not

I. Bourdel-Marchasson et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181

possible to define a unique preventative strategy for all patients with the metabolic syndrome or diabetes. The results, thus far, of the preventative strategies targeting the metabolic syndrome or blood glucose control are somewhat disappointing. However, a clearer definition of the population who might benefit from such interventions is needed, and it is likely that early interventions will have the best effects. Conflict of interest statement None of the authors have any conflict of interest related to this paper. References [1] Ramaroson H, Helmer C, Barberger-Gateau P, Letenneur L, Dartigues JF. Prévalence de la démence et de la maladie d’Alzheimer chez les personnes de 75 ans et plus : données réactualisées de la cohorte Paquid. [Prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease among subjects aged 75 years or over: updated results of the PAQUID cohort]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2003;159:405–11. [2] Bourdel-Marchasson I, Helmer C, Barberger-Gateau P, Peuchant E, Fevrier B, Ritchie K, et al. Characteristics of undiagnosed diabetes in community-dwelling French elderly: the 3C study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007;76:257–64. [3] Leibson CL, Rocca WA, Hanson VA, Cha R, Kokmen E, O’Brien PC, et al. Risk of dementia among persons with diabetes mellitus: a populationbased cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:301–8. [4] Ott A, Stolk RP, Hofman A, van Harskamp F, Grobbee DE, Breteler MM. Association of diabetes mellitus and dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Diabetologia 1996;39:1392–7. [5] Yoshitake T, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, Ohmura T, Iwamoto H, Nakayama K, et al. Incidence and risk factors of vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in a defined elderly Japanese population: the Hisayama Study. Neurology 1995;45:1161–8. [6] Luchsinger JA, Tang MX, Stern Y, Shea S, Mayeux R. Diabetes mellitus and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with stroke in a multiethnic cohort. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:635–41. [7] Xu WL, von Strauss E, Qiu CX, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. Uncontrolled diabetes increases the risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a population-based cohort study. Diabetologia 2009;52:1031–9. [8] Akomolafe A, Beiser A, Meigs JB, Au R, Green RC, Farrer LA, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of developing Alzheimer disease: results from the Framingham Study. Arch Neurol 2006;63:1551–5. [9] Curb JD, Rodriguez BL, Abbott RD, Petrovitch H, Ross GW, Masaki KH, et al. Longitudinal association of vascular and Alzheimer’s dementias, diabetes, and glucose tolerance. Neurology 1999;52:971–5. [10] Raffaitin C, Gin H, Empana JP, Helmer C, Berr C, Tzourio C, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk for incident Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia: the Three-City Study. Diabetes Care 2009;32:169–74. [11] Hassing LB, Johansson B, Nilsson SE, Berg S, Pedersen NL, Gatz M, et al. Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for vascular dementia, but not for Alzheimer’s disease: a population-based study of the oldest old. Int Psychogeriatr 2002;14:239–48. [12] Biessels GJ, Staekenborg S, Brunner E, Brayne C, Scheltens P. Risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:64–74. [13] Biessels GJ, Koffeman A, Scheltens P. Diabetes and cognitive impairment. Clinical diagnosis and brain imaging in patients attending a memory clinic. J Neurol 2006;253:477–82. [14] Irie F, Fitzpatrick AL, Lopez OL, Kuller LH, Peila R, Newman AB, et al. Enhanced risk for Alzheimer disease in persons with type 2 diabetes and APOE epsilon4: the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study. Arch Neurol 2008;65:89–93.

179

[15] Ueki A, Kawano M, Namba Y, Kawakami M, Ikeda K. A high frequency of apolipoprotein E4 isoprotein in Japanese patients with late-onset nonfamilial Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 1993;163:166–8. [16] Kopf D, Frolich L. Risk of incident Alzheimer’s disease in diabetic patients: a systematic review of prospective trials. J Alzheimers Dis 2009;16:677–85. [17] Nelson PT, Smith CD, Abner EA, Schmitt FA, Scheff SW, Davis GJ, et al. Human cerebral neuropathology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1792:454–69. [18] Censori B, Manara O, Agostinis C, Camerlingo M, Casto L, Galavotti B, et al. Dementia after first stroke. Stroke 1996;27:1205–10. [19] Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Paik MC, Sano M, Mohr JP, Aboumatar S, et al. Frequency and clinical determinants of dementia after ischemic stroke. Neurology 2000;54:1124–31. [20] Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Paik M, Figueroa M, Gropen TI, Stern Y, et al. Clinical determinants of dementia related to stroke. Ann Neurol 1993;33:568–75. [21] Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Sano M, Stern Y. Recovery of cognitive function after stroke. Stroke 1996;27:1798–803. [22] Stewart R, Prince M, Mann A. Vascular risk factors and Alzheimer’s disease. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1999;33:809–13. [23] Nielson KA, Nolan JH, Berchtold NC, Sandman CA, Mulnard RA, Cotman CW. Apolipoprotein-E genotyping of diabetic dementia patients: is diabetes rare in Alzheimer’s disease? J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44: 897–904. [24] Kuusisto J, Koivisto K, Mykkanen L, Helkala EL, Vanhanen M, Hanninen T, et al. Association between features of the insulin resistance syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease independently of apolipoprotein E4 phenotype: cross sectional population based study. BMJ 1997;315:1045–9. [25] Muller M, Tang MX, Schupf N, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Luchsinger JA. Metabolic syndrome and dementia risk in a multiethnic elderly cohort. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2007;24:185–92. [26] Scott RD, Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E, Wiederholt WC. The association of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and cognitive function in an older cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:1217–22. [27] Bourdel-Marchasson I, Dubroca B, Manciet G, Decamps A, Emeriau JP, Dartigues JF. Prevalence of diabetes and effect on quality of life in older French living in the community: the PAQUID epidemiological survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:295–301. [28] Yaffe K, Blackwell T, Kanaya AM, Davidowitz N, Barrett-Connor E, Krueger K. Diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and development of cognitive impairment in older women. Neurology 2004;63:658–63. [29] Bruehl H, Wolf OT, Sweat V, Tirsi A, Richardson S, Convit A. Modifiers of cognitive function and brain structure in middle-aged and elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Brain Res 2009;1280:186–94. [30] Arvanitakis Z, Bennett DA, Wilson RS, Barnes LL. Diabetes and cognitive systems in older black and white persons. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2010;24:37–42. [31] Saczynski JS, Jonsdottir MK, Garcia ME, Jonsson PV, Peila R, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Cognitive impairment: an increasingly important complication of type 2 diabetes: the age, gene/environment susceptibility–Reykjavik study. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:1132–9. [32] Yeung SE, Fischer AL, Dixon RA. Exploring effects of type 2 diabetes on cognitive functioning in older adults. Neuropsychology 2009;23:1–9. [33] Shorr RI, de Rekeneire N, Resnick HE, Yaffe K, Somes GW, Kanaya AM, et al. Glycemia and cognitive function in older adults using glucoselowering drugs. J Nutr Health Aging 2006;10:297–301. [34] Cukierman-Yaffe T, Gerstein HC, Williamson JD, Lazar RM, Lovato L, Miller ME, et al. Relationship between baseline glycemic control and cognitive function in individuals with type 2 diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors: the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes-memory in diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) trial. Diabetes Care 2009;32:221–6. [35] Zhou H, Lu W, Shi Y, Bai F, Chang J, Yuan Y, et al. Impairments in cognition and resting-state connectivity of the hippocampus in elderly subjects with type 2 diabetes. Neurosci Lett (in press). [36] Colberg SR, Somma CT, Sechrist SR. Physical activity participation may offset some of the negative impact of diabetes on cognitive function. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2008;9:434–8.

180

I. Bourdel-Marchasson et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181

[37] Roberts RO, Geda YE, Knopman DS, Christianson TJ, Pankratz VS, Boeve BF, et al. Association of duration and severity of diabetes mellitus with mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2008;65:1066–73. [38] Toro P, Schonknecht P, Schroder J. Type II diabetes in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: results from a prospective population-based study in Germany. J Alzheimers Dis 2009;16:687–91. [39] Tiehuis AM, Mali WP, van Raamt AF, Visseren FL, Biessels GJ, van Zandvoort MJ, et al. Cognitive dysfunction and its clinical and radiological determinants in patients with symptomatic arterial disease and diabetes. J Neurol Sci 2009;283:170–4. [40] Manschot SM, Biessels GJ, de Valk H, Algra A, Rutten GE, van der Grond J, et al. Metabolic and vascular determinants of impaired cognitive performance and abnormalities on brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2007;50:2388–97. [41] Gregg EW, Yaffe K, Cauley JA, Rolka DB, Blackwell TL, Narayan KM, et al. Is diabetes associated with cognitive impairment and cognitive decline among older women? Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:174–80. [42] Fontbonne A, Berr C, Ducimetiere P, Alperovitch A. Changes in cognitive abilities over a 4-year period are unfavorably affected in elderly diabetic subjects: results of the Epidemiology of Vascular Aging Study. Diabetes Care 2001;24:366–70. [43] Kanaya AM, Barrett-Connor E, Gildengorin G, Yaffe K. Change in cognitive function by glucose tolerance status in older adults: a 4-year prospective study of the Rancho Bernardo study cohort. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1327–33. [44] Yaffe K, Blackwell T, Whitmer RA, Krueger K, Barrett Connor E. Glycosylated hemoglobin level and development of mild cognitive impairment or dementia in older women. J Nutr Health Aging 2006;10: 293–5. [45] Wu JH, Haan MN, Liang J, Ghosh D, Gonzalez HM, Herman WH. Impact of diabetes on cognitive function among older Latinos: a population-based cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:686–93. [46] Kim JH, Koh SB. Extensive white matter injury in hypoglycemic coma. Neurology 2007;68:1074. [47] Bruce DG, Davis WA, Casey GP, Clarnette RM, Brown SG, Jacobs IG, et al. Severe hypoglycaemia and cognitive impairment in older patients with diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study. Diabetologia 2009;52: 1808–15. [48] Whitmer RA, Karter AJ, Yaffe K, Quesenberry Jr CP, Selby JV. Hypoglycemic episodes and risk of dementia in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2009;301:1565–72. [49] Thabit H, Kennelly SM, Bhagarva A, Ogunlewe M, McCormack PM, McDermott JH, et al. Utilization of frontal assessment battery and executive interview 25 in assessing for dysexecutive syndrome and its association with diabetes self-care in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009;86:208–12. [50] Burns JM, Donnelly JE, Anderson HS, Mayo MS, Spencer-Gardner L, Thomas G, et al. Peripheral insulin and brain structure in early Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2007;69:1094–104. [51] den Heijer T, Vermeer SE, van Dijk EJ, Prins ND, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, et al. Type 2 diabetes and atrophy of medial temporal lobe structures on brain MRI. Diabetologia 2003;46:1604–10. [52] Cook DG, Leverenz JB, McMillan PJ, Kulstad JJ, Ericksen S, Roth RA, et al. Reduced hippocampal insulin-degrading enzyme in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease is associated with the apolipoprotein Eepsilon4 allele. Am J Pathol 2003;162:313–9. [53] Vepsalainen S, Parkinson M, Helisalmi S, Mannermaa A, Soininen H, Tanzi RE, et al. Insulin-degrading enzyme is genetically associated with Alzheimer’s disease in the Finnish population. J Med Genet 2007;44:606–8. [54] Sakai A, Ujike H, Nakata K, Takehisa Y, Imamura T, Uchida N, et al. No association between the insulin degrading enzyme gene and Alzheimer’s disease in a Japanese population. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2004;125B:87–91. [55] Marlowe L, Peila R, Benke KS, Hardy J, White LR, Launer LJ, et al. Insulin-degrading enzyme haplotypes affect insulin levels but not dementia risk. Neurodegener Dis 2006;3:320–6.

[56] Alafuzoff I, Aho L, Helisalmi S, Mannermaa A, Soininen H. Beta-amyloid deposition in brains of subjects with diabetes. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2009;35:60–8. [57] Heitner J, Dickson D. Diabetics do not have increased Alzheimer-type pathology compared with age-matched control subjects. A retrospective postmortem immunocytochemical and histofluorescent study. Neurology 1997;49:1306–11. [58] Cole GM, Frautschy SA. The role of insulin and neurotrophic factor signaling in brain aging and Alzheimer’s Disease. Exp Gerontol 2007;42:10–21. [59] Manning CA, Ragozzino ME, Gold PE. Glucose enhancement of memory in patients with probable senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Neurobiol Aging 1993;14:523–8. [60] Manning CA, Stone WS, Korol DL, Gold PE. Glucose enhancement of 24-h memory retrieval in healthy elderly humans. Behav Brain Res 1998;93:71–6. [61] Manning CA, Parsons MW, Gold PE. Anterograde and retrograde enhancement of 24-h memory by glucose in elderly humans. Behav Neural Biol 1992;58:125–30. [62] Parsons MW, Gold PE. Glucose enhancement of memory in elderly humans: an inverted-U dose-response curve. Neurobiol Aging 1992;13:401–4. [63] Craft S, Zallen G, Baker LD. Glucose and memory in mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1992;14: 253–67. [64] Gonder-Frederick L, Hall JL, Vogt J, Cox DJ, Green J, Gold PE. Memory enhancement in elderly humans: effects of glucose ingestion. Physiol Behav 1987;41:503–4. [65] Messier C, Gagnon M. Glucose regulation and cognitive functions: relation to Alzheimer’s disease and diabetes. Behav Brain Res 1996;75: 1–11. [66] Greenwood CE, Kaplan RJ, Hebblethwaite S, Jenkins DJ. Carbohydrateinduced memory impairment in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1961–6. [67] Pais I, Hallschmid M, Jauch-Chara K, Schmid SM, Oltmanns KM, Peters A, et al. Mood and cognitive functions during acute euglycaemia and mild hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetic patients. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2007;115:42–6. [68] Kaplan RJ, Greenwood CE, Winocur G, Wolever TM. Cognitive performance is associated with glucose regulation in healthy elderly persons and can be enhanced with glucose and dietary carbohydrates. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:825–36. [69] Messier C, Tsiakas M, Gagnon M, Desrochers A, Awad N. Effect of age and glucoregulation on cognitive performance. Neurobiol Aging 2003;24:985–1003. [70] Kaplan RJ, Greenwood CE, Winocur G, Wolever TM. Dietary protein, carbohydrate, and fat enhance memory performance in the healthy elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:687–93. [71] Nilsson A, Radeborg K, Bjorck I. Effects of differences in postprandial glycaemia on cognitive functions in healthy middle-aged subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009;63:113–20. [72] Papanikolaou Y, Palmer H, Binns MA, Jenkins DJ, Greenwood CE. Better cognitive performance following a low-glycaemic-index compared with a high-glycaemic-index carbohydrate meal in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2006;49:855–62. [73] Devore EE, Stampfer MJ, Breteler MM, Rosner B, Hee Kang J, Okereke O, et al. Dietary fat intake and cognitive decline in women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:635–40. [74] Whitwell JL, Przybelski SA, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Petersen RC, et al. 3D maps from multiple MRI illustrate changing atrophy patterns as subjects progress from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2007;130:1777–86. [75] Rasgon NL, Kenna HA, Wroolie TE, Kelley R, Silverman D, Brooks J, et al. Insulin resistance and hippocampal volume in women at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging (in press). [76] Kwon HM, Kim BJ, Park JH, Ryu WS, Kim CK, Lee SH, et al. Significant association of metabolic syndrome with silent brain infarction in elderly people. J Neurol 2009;256:1825–31.

I. Bourdel-Marchasson et al. / Diabetes & Metabolism 36 (2010) 173–181 [77] Wu W, Brickman AM, Luchsinger J, Ferrazzano P, Pichiule P, Yoshita M, et al. The brain in the age of old: the hippocampal formation is targeted differentially by diseases of late life. Ann Neurol 2008;64: 698–706. [78] Anan F, Masaki T, Shimomura T, Fujiki M, Umeno Y, Eshima N, et al. Abdominal visceral fat accumulation is associated with hippocampus volume in non-dementia patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Neuroimage 2010;49:57–62. [79] Stolk RP, Breteler MM, Ott A, Pols HA, Lamberts SW, Grobbee DE, et al. Insulin and cognitive function in an elderly population. The Rotterdam Study. Diabetes Care 1997;20:792–5. [80] Segura B, Jurado MA, Freixenet N, Albuin C, Muniesa J, Junque C. Mental slowness and executive dysfunctions in patients with metabolic syndrome. Neurosci Lett 2009;462:49–53. [81] van den Berg E, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Kessels RP, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EH, et al. Cognitive functioning in elderly persons with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome: the Hoorn study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008;26:261–9. [82] Dore GA, Elias MF, Robbins MA, Budge MM, Elias PK. Relation between central adiposity and cognitive function in the Maine-Syracuse Study: attenuation by physical activity. Ann Behav Med 2008;35: 341–50. [83] Vanhanen M, Soininen H. Glucose intolerance, cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Opin Neurol 1998;11:673–7. [84] Kalmijn S, Feskens EJ, Launer LJ, Stijnen T, Kromhout D. Glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinaemia and cognitive function in a general population of elderly men. Diabetologia 1995;38:1096–102. [85] Geroldi C, Frisoni GB, Paolisso G, Bandinelli S, Lamponi M, Abbatecola AM, et al. Insulin resistance in cognitive impairment: the InCHIANTI study. Arch Neurol 2005;62:1067–72. [86] Roriz-Cruz M, Rosset I, Wada T, Sakagami T, Ishine M, De Sa Roriz-Filho J, et al. Cognitive impairment and frontal-subcortical geriatric syndrome are associated with metabolic syndrome in a stroke-free population. Neurobiol Aging 2007;28:1723–36. [87] Lee KS, Jang Y, Chung YK, Chung JH, Oh BH, Hong CH. Relationship between the diagnostic components of metabolic syndrome (MS) and cognition by ApoE genotype in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010;50:69–72. [88] Young SE, Mainous 3rd AG, Carnemolla M. Hyperinsulinemia and cognitive decline in a middle-aged cohort. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2688–93. [89] Yaffe K, Weston AL, Blackwell T, Krueger KA. The metabolic syndrome and development of cognitive impairment among older women. Arch Neurol 2009;66:324–8. [90] Luchsinger JA, Tang MX, Shea S, Mayeux R. Hyperinsulinemia and risk of Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2004;63:1187–92. [91] Peila R, Rodriguez BL, White LR, Launer LJ. Fasting insulin and incident dementia in an elderly population of Japanese-American men. Neurology 2004;63:228–33. [92] Okereke OI, Pollak MN, Hu FB, Hankinson SE, Selkoe DJ, Grodstein F. Plasma C-peptide levels and rates of cognitive decline in older, community-dwelling women without diabetes. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2008;33:455–61. [93] Okereke OI, Selkoe DJ, Pollak MN, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Hankinson SE, et al. A profile of impaired insulin degradation in relation to late-life cognitive decline: a preliminary investigation. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009;24:177–82. [94] Ronnemaa E, Zethelius B, Sundelof J, Sundstrom J, DegermanGunnarsson M, Berne C, et al. Impaired insulin secretion increases the risk of Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2008;71:1065–71. [95] Elias MF, Elias PK, Sullivan LM, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB. Obesity, diabetes and cognitive deficit: the Framingham Heart Study. Neurobiol Aging 2005;26(Suppl 1):11–6.

181

[96] Whitmer RA, Gunderson EP, Barrett-Connor E, Quesenberry Jr CP, Yaffe K. Obesity in middle age and future risk of dementia: a 27 year longitudinal population based study. BMJ 2005;330:1360. [97] Kilander L, Nyman H, Boberg M, Hansson L, Lithell H. Hypertension is related to cognitive impairment: a 20-year follow-up of 999 men. Hypertension 1998;31:780–6. [98] Yaffe K, Kanaya A, Lindquist K, Simonsick EM, Harris T, Shorr RI, et al. The metabolic syndrome, inflammation, and risk of cognitive decline. JAMA 2004;292:2237–42. [99] van den Berg E, Biessels GJ, de Craen AJ, Gussekloo J, Westendorp RG. The metabolic syndrome is associated with decelerated cognitive decline in the oldest old. Neurology 2007;69:979–85. [100] Bonin-Guillaume S, Herrmann FR, Boillat D, Szanto I, Michel JP, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, et al. Insulinemia and leptinemia in geriatric patients: markers of the metabolic syndrome or of undernutrition? Diabetes Metab 2006;32:236–43. [101] Holden KF, Lindquist K, Tylavsky FA, Rosano C, Harris TB, Yaffe K. Serum leptin level and cognition in the elderly: findings from the Health ABC Study. Neurobiol Aging 2009;30:1483–9. [102] Naor M, Steingruber HJ, Westhoff K, Schottenfeld-Naor Y, Gries AF. Cognitive function in elderly non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients before and after inpatient treatment for metabolic control. J Diabetes Complications 1997;11:40–6. [103] Ryan CM, Freed MI, Rood JA, Cobitz AR, Waterhouse BR, Strachan MW. Improving metabolic control leads to better working memory in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:345–51. [104] Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Billot L, Woodward M, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2560–72. [105] Watson GS, Cholerton BA, Reger MA, Baker LD, Plymate SR, Asthana S, et al. Preserved cognition in patients with early Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment during treatment with rosiglitazone: a preliminary study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005;13: 950–8. [106] Risner ME, Saunders AM, Altman JF, Ormandy GC, Craft S, Foley IM, et al. Efficacy of rosiglitazone in a genetically defined population with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacogenomics J 2006;6: 246–54. [107] West R, Beeri MS, Schmeidler J, Hannigan CM, Angelo G, Grossman HT, et al. Better memory functioning associated with higher total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in very elderly subjects without the apolipoprotein e4 allele. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008;16: 781–5. [108] Trompet S, van Vliet P, de Craen AJ, Jolles J, Buckley BM, Murphy MB, et al. Pravastatin and cognitive function in the elderly. Results of the PROSPER study. J Neurol 257:85–90. [109] Mok VC, Lam WW, Fan YH, Wong A, Ng PW, Tsoi TH, et al. Effects of statins on the progression of cerebral white matter lesion: post hoc analysis of the regression of cerebral artery stenosis (ROCAS) study. J Neurol 2009;256:750–7. [110] Forette F, Seux ML, Staessen JA, Thijs L, Birkenhager WH, Babarskiene MR, et al. Prevention of dementia in randomised double-blind placebocontrolled systolic hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial. Lancet 1998;352:1347–51. [111] McGuinness B, Todd S, Passmore P, Bullock R. Blood pressure lowering in patients without prior cerebrovascular disease for prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD004034. [112] Yamamoto N, Yamanaka G, Takasugi E, Ishikawa M, Yamanaka T, Murakami S, et al. Lifestyle intervention reversed cognitive function in aged people with diabetes mellitus: two-year follow up. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009;85:343–6.