391 to the said
business, is about commencing under the authority and sanction of the medical man who attends the sick-poor at the dispensary, where the former either attended the practice, or the lectures, for a limited period. Who would incur the expence of medical certificates, and pay the fees at Apothecaries’ Hall, when a few weeks, and as many lines, only, are wanted to qualify an individual to treat disease in all its varied forms ? I am a Member of the College, and a Licentiate of the Hall, and am, with many others, disgusted at the state of things in the profession. 1 am, Sir, with feelings of admiration for what you have already done to uphold the respectability of the profession, your most obedient
practice
dropsical symptoms. The hypertrophy of his heart, with its abnormal sounds, so accurately described by Mr. Taylor, the apothecary, of course remain, and the diof his
latation
is
also undiminished.
It must;
therefore, be obvious that in proposing this new plan of treating hypertrophy of the heart, Dr. T. did not mean to imply that it was shown to have any influence in curiitg. You will, of course, give this note immediate insertion, as the lecture forms a matter of
great conversation.
yours, &c.
I am,
Sir,
A PUPIL.
University College Hospital, Nov. 27, Nov. 27, 1838.
servant, A PRACTISING SURGEOK.
Bristol, Nov. 26,1838. *,/./1 The foregoing letter having been authenticated by the signature of two re-
MERCURY WITH CHLORIDE OF SODA.
To the Editor of THE LANCET. spectable surgeons, we think it to be our SIR:—In reply to the question of your duty to inform those gentlemen that, in our correspondent, Mr. Samuel (LANCET, No. 3, opinion, the report which they have heard, present Vol.), whether the severe effects of
the mercury in his cases are to be solely attributed to a peculiar idiosyncracy, or to the simultaneous exhibition of the chloride of soda, I beg to state my opinion, that it is to be attributed to the latter only, as I have had occasion frequently to observe the increased effects of small doses of mercury, a conviction, under the 55th Geo. III. There when administered at the same time as the exists no Act of Parliament to relieve such chloride. I am, Sir, your obedient servant. W. W. B. DICKINSON, M.D. impostors from the penalties which are im5,1838. 1838. Marazion, Cornwall, Nov. 5, posed by that statute. If our correspondent should obtain any more information on the subject of his CQmINTELLECT AFTER LOSS OF MUCH munication, we shall be glad to hear from BRAIN. him again, and will take care that the SoTo the Editor of THE LANCET. ciety of Apothecaries is also placed in posThe profession shall then session of it. SIR:—Your valuable Journal of Nov. 3, learn whether that body be really disposed, contains a communication from Mr. Hardor not, to check the career of unqualified ing Drawbridge, according to which a girl had continued to enjoy the entire use of her pretenders, and thereby protect the interests intellectual faculties for four days after the of regularly licensed practitioners. loss of a considerable portion of the cerebral mass. You are, of course, aware that such a phenomenon is recoucileable with the DR. A. T. THOMSON’S LECTURE ; doctrines of phrenology, provided the injury be confined to only one of the hemispheres. ON Your correspondent would, therefore, conHYPERTROPHY OF THE HEART. fer an obligation on your numerous readers by informing them whethe1’, and to what To the Editor of THE LANCET. extent, both the hemispheres were affected. SIR:-It occurred to me, on reading the Could Mr. Drawbridge, at the same time, clinical lecture of Dr. A. T. Thomson, pub- offer some observations respecting the lished in THE LANCET of the 24th inst., that amount of intelligence exhibited, and also the manner in which it was expressed what particular phrenological organs were would tend to mislead your readers as to injured, his information would acquire adthe Doctor’s views. Dr. Thomson did not ditional value. Yours respectfully. 7neqn that Gardner was discharged 11 appaA LECTURER. rently well" of his hypertrophy, but simply Newington, Nov. 6,1838.
respecting the conduct of the Society of Apothecaries, is a calumny on that body. Such practitioners as those who are described by our correspondents are, to all intents and purposes, unqualified persons, and might, without doubt, be prosecuted to