147
Advances in ColZoid and Interface Science, 40 (1992) 147-156 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam 00102
A
Interfacial
orientation
I.PANAIOTOV
of DOPC liposomes water interface. *,Tz.IVANOVA**
spread
at the
air-
and A.SANFELD***.
*Visiting Professor at University Aix-Marseille 3,France. Biophysical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Sofia, Anton Ivanov str. 1, 1126 Sofia **Pulma Laboratory SoBa,Bulgaria. ***Universities
of Brussels, Belgium and Aix-Marseille 3, France.
Abstract. The kinetics
of surface
spread at constant surface pressure describing electrical
film formation
from DOPC small unilamellar
surface is studied, by measuring
and of the surface potential.
the interfacial
orientation
affinity of orientation
The thermodynamical
process
shows
and of the electrical
vesicles
the time evolution
of the
approach
the importance
of the
surface pressure.
Introductioa The mechanism
of formation
of a surface
film from liposomes
spread
at the
air-water interface was recently studied by several authors [l-43. The behavior following
of the liposomes
processes
i) diffusion
at an air-water
single
this phenomenon,
the diffusion
transformation
constant
This rough
theoretical
vesicles
scheme
allows
A better
process is however required.
In this
field
Sanfeld
[5,6]
0 1992 -
into
mesophases. consists
summarized
open
to obtain
understanding
Especially,
I41 in a
surface-active a global
kinetic
of the interfacial
it is interesting
to evaluate
of the complex process of orientation.
has developed
in order to study the interfacial
0001~6666/92/$15.00
in a slow
a first approximation
closed
the role of the pure electrical contribution
approach
resulting
into superficial
process from the other processes
of perfectly
of the transformation.
orientation
interaction
of closed bilayer structures
quantitatively
structures.
by the
from the interface to the bulk;
transformation
to distinguish
is governed
:
ii) a more complex liposome-surface
To approach
interface
an irreversible dipole orientation.
thermodynamics He has shown
Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. All rights reserved.
the relationship between the affinity of orientation of dipoles and the rate of orientation.
L.Lavielle
et al. [7-91 applied this last theory to interfacial
properties of grafted polyethylene in contact with water. The aim of the present work is i) to follow the kinetics of the surface film formation from DOPC small unilamellar vesicles spread at constant surface area, by recording the time evolution of surface parameters : surface pressure x and surface potential AV ii) to give the theoretical frame to describe this inter-facial orientation process.
Materials Preparation
Dioleoylphosphatidylcholine Company.
and Methods.
of the DOPC liposomes.
(DOPC)
is purchased
from Sigma
Analytical grade chloroform is purchased from Merck.
NaCl solution is made from triple-distilled
Chemical The 0.15m
water and Merck purest quality
NaCl roasted at 700°C. Liposomes are prepared by the Bangham method [lo] with sonication at 20°C (above the phospholipid phase transition temperature) using a probe with a Branson Sonifer cell disruptor B30 (350 W, 20 kHz) for several 5 min periods (resting time 5 min) until the solution becomes almost clear. The liposomal suspensions are filterd through a 0.22 pm Millex GV single-use filter unit (Millipore).
The phospholipid
concentration
is equal to 10 mg/ml.
The
suspensions are stored at +4”C during two weeks.
so 60-
PARTICLE UNIRDDAL
DIAMETER (NM) DISTRIBUTION BROAD
Fig.1 Distribution of mean particle diameter for DOPC liposomal suspensions.
149
The liposomes size measurements analyzer
Coulter
are performed with a submicron particle
model N4 MD (Coulter
Electronics)-temperature
20’33,
detection angle 90°, measurement time 5 min. The mean particle diameter d is about 50 nm with monopeak dispersion (Fig.1). The liposomal concentration
Co of the suspension can be calculated assuming
that all the phospholipids are contained liposomes : Co = 2.4 1014liposomes/cms. Measurements
in unilamellar
50 nm diameter
of surface parameters.
The different volumes of the liposomal suspension are spread at constant surface area of 186 cm2 . Spreading is performed by using an Agla syringe, during about l-2 min. The subphase is 0.15 m NaCl at T= 295°K. The kinetics of surface film formation after spreading is studied by recording the evolution of the surface pressure 7~ and of the surface potential AV with time t. The time t = 0 corresponds to the end of the spreading procedure. The surface pressure x is measured by the Wilhelmy plate method by using a platinum plate and the electronic computered balance KSV with a precision 0.02dyn cm-r. The surface potential
AV is measured by using a gold coated Am241 ionizing
electrode, a reference calomel electrode and an electrometer VA-J-51 connected to a Sefram chart recorder with an accuracy f 15mV on the initial surface potential Ve. Model and theoreticalapproach
After spreading of the liposomal suspension at the air-water interface, the kinetics can be described by two simultaneous processes (Fig.%) : i) an irreversible diffusion process of intact liposomes to the liquid bulk phase, ii) a progressive transformation
of perfectly closed structures (non surface active
liposomes without any effect on the surface potential) into open structures (surface active mesophases increasing the surface potential). It was shown [4] that for large amounts of liposomal suspensions spread at the air-water interface, the diffusion of liposomes towards the liquid bulk phase did not affect the liposomal concentration Co at the subsurface. The number of
150 Surface potential = 0 Surface pressure = 0
I Fig.2
diffusion
Scheme
surface
Surface potential ( t ) Surface pressure ( t )
film
describing after
the two processes
the spreading
involved
of liposomal
in the formation
suspension
of a
at the air-water
interface.
liposomes
in the first subsurface
thus constant.
layer able to be continuously
In this case, the
x(t)
and the
continuous
transformation
phospholipid
molecules
AV(t) of
the
into destroyed
kinetic
curves
closed
spherical
In addition to a mechanical
an electrical process.
dipole contribution
As we will see furtheron
at constant we will describing
phospholipids
contribution
a pure
structures
to the of
the
have a dipolar character
(short range forces) there is t.hus
the reorientation
phenomenological
the orientation
are only related
which plays a role in the complex
and uniform surface concentration.
use
is
surface structures.
We notice that the surface reorganizing [ll].
transformed
One may then write f = Cod.
orientation
kinetics will be considered
In order to estimate this effect,
theory
developed
previously
[5,6]
for thin surface layers.
Neglecting
the dipolar quadratic
effects due to the second-order
(dispersion
terms),
of the interfacial
the variation
and p is given, for one single orientating do=-rdp-xA,d{m$
component
tension
:
contributions
(T , at constant
T
151
where
(T is the macroscopic
liposomes
in the first subsurface
the open structure, surface
surface tension,
v
orientation
moment per mole
M
acting
potential
transformed
of the liposomes,
on the mean projection
i
into
Ai is the
of the dipole
< mi > .
From a microscopic mechanical
layer able to be continuously
is the chemical
affinity
I- = Cc d is the number of spread
background,
we are allowed to split all the forces into both
and electrical
E contributions.
Consequently,
Eq. (1) can be
read do=da,-do,=-rd~,FAiMd(mi)+
Tdp,+
FAiEd(m$ (3)
where
(3)
d~M=-rd~M-CAiMd(mi) 1 As previously
and
do,=-
rdpa-
T AiEd(mi)
(4)
shown [5 Eq.81 , Eq.(4) leads to the relation
l-1 30,
AiE=d(llli)
_-
30,
eq 9(mi)
(5)
where the first derivative in the r-h-s of (4) is taken at orientation By using the microscopic each containing
equilibrium.
model of a compact layer of discrete dipoles in 1 cells
k neighbours,
it was shown [5 Eq.191 that
(6) where
mk] is the distance between two dipoles in a lattice characterized
parameter dipoles
a
; v
with respect
moment and
is a coefficient to the surface,
depending m
on the relative
is the arithmetic
position
by the of the
value of the dipole
E is a mean static dielectric constant of the medium.
By taking into account Eq.(6) the expression (5) reads
(7)
152 In the case
of spread
liposomes
at air-water
rotating dipoles towards final equilibrium
interface
with
state, it is reasonable
progressively to assume that
(8) Indeed,
out of equilibrium
distance
the orientation
parameter
mkl are much more sensitive to the variations
than at equilibrium.
and the dipolar
Eq.(5) reduces to
3%
*i~=qq
At constant
As a first approximation,
v
of the dipolar moment
(9)
T, p , pE ( according to Eq.9)
the integration
of Eq.(9) from (TE= 0 (t
= 0) to o,(t) leads to
(10) Let us now express called Marcelin-De
where
the electrical
orientation
affinity
Aj~ by means of the so-
Donder relation [5 Eq.111 :
d(mi)
and
vi =dt
0
are the direct rates of dipolar orientation at time t and t = 0 respectively. During
the
mesophases,
continuous AV(t)
concentrations. example
However,
constant
both
electrical
dipolar
electrical
effects.
volumes
into
orientation
spread
Co at the subsurface
able to be continuously
Consequently,
contribution,
liposomes
dipolar
in the next paragraph)
concentration
in the first sublayer (r = Co d ).
of the
electric
for large
> 1600 ~1 as considered
affect the liposomial liposomes
transformation
measures
on the
interfacial and surface surface
the diffusion
doesn’t
and the number transformed
II(t) measures
of
is thus
for this case, AV(t) only measures
whereas
(for
both mechanical
the and
153
In order to calculate the pure electrical orientation affinity AiE(Eq.(ll)) corresponding
electrical part of the surface tension
surface potential measurements
and the
(Ts (Eq.(lO)) we use the
AV(t) . Indeed, the surface potential [12] of
an uncharged monolayer is related to the vertical component i = z of the dipole moment < mi > , the dielectric constant E and the surface density F ( r = C, d). A”=O.&%E
(12)
The AV versus t curve allows to obtain and d /dt if E and I are known. From and d /dt , Ais and es are derived. The knowledge of E is however not trivial aswell as the quantitative interpretation
of the
surface potential data.
Experimental rarmlts and discussion. Figures
3 and 4 show the kinetics of the surface pressure
surface potential
n(t) and of the
AV(t) at constant surface area (186 cm*) after spreading of
different volumes of DOPC liposomal suspensions (80,180,400
and 1600 ~1).
For 80, 180 and 400 ml, the kinetics is governed by both diffusion transformation
and
processes l.41. As previously shown 141 for an upper critical
TimeIsocl Fig 3 Time variation of the surface pressure x after spreading of various volumes of DOPC liposomal suspension ( 80 ,180 , 400 and 1600 ul ; spreading area = 186 cm2 )
154
Fig.4 Time variation of the surface potential AV after spreading of various volumes of DOPC liposomal suspension ( 80 , 180 ,400 and 1600 pl ; spreading area = 186 cm2 1.
volume of spread liposomal suspension, the kinetic process is nomore controlled by diffusion. The curves obtained above this critical value (1600 pl for DOPC liposomes) are practically merged. By using Eq.(12) and with an approximate value for E (E = 2) ,we calculate the values of (t) from the AV(t) data obtained for a spread volume equal to 1600 ~1. After a graphical derivation, one gets the values of Ai, by Eq.(ll). integrating graphically, Eq.( 10) gives the corresponding values of bs.
By
Due to the unaccuracy of the initial time of the process (O-60 s), it is difficult to obtain the exact result corresponding to the beginning of the kinetics. Table 1 gives the values of the mean vertical projection of the dipole moment per molecule < mi> (d), the electrical surface orientation affinity Ai, (e ), the electrical and mechanical parts of the surface pressure xs (0 and xM (g), obtained from the experimental data x(t) (b) and AV(t) (cl.
155
Table 1. Table 1. Time evolution of the vertical electrical
component
affinity
pressure
of the surface pressure
after
A,
x , of the surface potential
of the mean dipole moment
, of the electrical
spreading
- xE
, of the orientation
and mechanical
of 1600 ~1 of DOPC
AV ,
liposomal
- ‘CM surface
suspension
with a
constant e = 2 .
a
b
c
d
e
t
n
AV
-=P
AiE
M
[dynhml
[mVl
ID/molec I
0
0 60
0
3000
0 0.80 2.50 3.00 4.90 6.45 7.80 10.75 14.00 IS.00
3600
15.85
440
4600
17.00
440
60 120 150 300 450 600 1200 2400
200 325 360 373 395 422 433
g =M
Idynkml [dyn/cm]
0.92 2.08 3.08 5.00 5.54 5.74 6.08 6.49 6.66 6.77 6.77
135
I-=E
0.280
0.33 0.58 0.71 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
0.150 0.100
0.030 0.010 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.001 0 0
0.47 1.92
2.29 4.06 5.60 6.95 9.90 13.15 14.15 15.00 16.15
eq The
electrical
surface
transformation process.
Indeed,
at
60s).
t = 60s ,
Ai,= 2 kT. After
of the process
It decreases
equilibrium.
affinity
the
mentioned,
the of the
t = 15Os, Ai, < kT .Similarly,
at the
orientation
present results (Table 1) is conditioned
during
acts at the beginning
xE is of the order of magnitude
during
As already
AiE decreases
It essentially
of the liposomes.
rotation
beginning
orientation
process
of xM (41% of x for t= to reach
the quantitative
5% of x at
interpretation
of the
to the value of E . However, instead of E
equal to 2 we assumed a rough time evolution of E (=l at t=O and =3 at t= t), the contribution important.
of
Ai,
at the beginning
of the process
For example, at t= 12Os, Ais --0.575
equilibrium
xE is 15% of I[. That goes without
quantitative
analysis
required.
of the results,
then becomes
more
(= 4kT) and xE is 78% of K. At saying that to give a better
the relationship
between
E and is
156
Conclusion.
After spreading a sufficiently large amount of liposomal suspension at the airwater interface, a progressive transformation of perfectly closed vesicles into open surface-active
structures
The time evolution
occurs.
of the surface
pressure and of the surface potential allows to show the importance of the electrical orientation affinity by means of the thermodynamics dipole layers.
of interface
The opening process is mainly governed by the mechanical
contributions due to short range forces. However, at least at the beginning of the dynamical transformation,
the electrical part of the surface pressure is
larger than 40% of the total surface pressure. Although a precise quantitative analysis of the results is conditioned
to the knowledge of the relationship
between the dielectric constant and the dipole moment, the present study permits one to compare the driving forces due to short and middle range interactions. References
1. F.Pattus, P.Desnuelle, R.Verger, BBA, 507 (1978) 62. 2. H.Schindler, BBA, 555 (1979) 316. 3. M.Obladen, D.Popp, C.Scholl, H.Schwartz, F.Jahnig, BBA, 735 (1983) 215. 4. Tz.Ivanova,
G.Georgiev,
I.Panaiotov,
M.Ivanova,
M.A.Surpas,
J.Proust,
F.Puisieux,Prog. Colloid Polym. Sci., 79 (1989) 23 5. A.Sanfeld, Nuovo Cimento, 12D,N”7 (1990) 901. 6. A.Sanfeld, “Introduction
to the thermodynamics
of charged
and polarized
layers”, Wiley Interscience, London (1968).
7. L.Lavielle, G.Lischetti, A.Sanfeld, J.Schu1tz,J.Co11.1nt.Sci.,138,N01(1990) 134 8. L.Lavielle, JSchultz, J.Coll.Int.Sci.,106,N02 (1985) 438. 9. L.Lavielle, J.Schultz,A.Sanfeld,
J.Coll.Int.Sci.,106,N”2 (1985) 446.
10. A.D.Bangham, M.M.Standish, J.C.Watkins, J.Moll.Biol.,lS (1965) 238. 11. H.Mohwald, Ann.Rev.Phys.Chem., 41 (1990) 441. 12. G.L.Gaines,“Insoluble
monolayers
Interscience, New York (1966).
at liquid-gas
interfaces”,
Wiley