Interferon and tumor necrosis factor as humoral mechanisms coupling hematopoietic activity to inflammation and injury

Interferon and tumor necrosis factor as humoral mechanisms coupling hematopoietic activity to inflammation and injury

Blood Reviews 29 (2015) 11–15 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Blood Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/blre REVIEW Interf...

282KB Sizes 1 Downloads 27 Views

Blood Reviews 29 (2015) 11–15

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Blood Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/blre

REVIEW

Interferon and tumor necrosis factor as humoral mechanisms coupling hematopoietic activity to inflammation and injury Nadir Askenasy ⁎ Frankel Laboratory, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva 49202, Israel

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Keywords: Interferon Tumor necrosis factor Stress hematopoiesis Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells Injury Inflammation

a b s t r a c t Enhanced hematopoiesis accompanies systemic responses to injury and infection. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) produced by injured cells and interferons (IFNs) secreted by inflammatory cells is a co-product of the process of clearance of debris and removal of still viable but dysfunctional cells. Concomitantly, these cytokines induce hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) activity as an intrinsic component of the systemic response. The proposed scenario includes induction of HSPC activity by type I (IFNα/β) and II (IFNγ) receptors within the quiescent bone marrow niches rendering progenitors responsive to additional signals. TNFα converges as a non-selective stimulant of HSPC activity and both cytokines synergize with other growth factors in promoting differentiation. These physiological signaling pathways of stress hematopoiesis occur quite frequent and do not cause HSPC extinction. The proposed role of IFNs and TNFs in stress hematopoiesis commends revision of their alleged involvement in bone marrow failure syndromes. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction The complex and delicate balance between quiescence and extinction by differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) is maintained by specific molecular configurations and extrinsic signals from the surrounding microenvironments. Units of regeneration in the hematopoietic system are endowed with inherent patterns of gene expression regulated at the transcriptional level that on the one hand prevent extinction by apoptosis and incidental induction of differentiation, and on the other hand make them sensitive to external signals. Cycling fetal hematopoietic progenitors are stabilized in a state of mitotic quiescence within the bone marrow in the early post-natal period [1]. Afterwards, signals evolving from specialized subendosteal marrow niches are dominant in preserving functional and mitotic quiescence of progenitors (referred to as quiescent niches) [2]. The state of functional and mitotic quiescence is transient and reversible, with occasional self-renewal [3] or quite frequent cycling [4], associated with vast variations in transcription and phenotype [5] that render progenitors residing in quiescent niches responsive to external stimuli [6]. These activities of progenitors are geographically distinct within the marrow of long bones: quiescent HSPCs reside in niches aligned along the endosteal surface whereas active progenitors switch to niches located in central marrow space [7]. Among numerous critical questions concerning the homeostasis of hematopoietic progenitors in quiescent marrow niches, intensive efforts are ⁎ Frankel Laboratory, Center for Stem Cell Research, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 14 Kaplan Street, Petach Tikva 49202, Israel. Tel.: + 972 3921 3954; fax: +972 3921 4156. E-mail address: [email protected].

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2014.09.002 0268-960X/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

directed to decipher the mechanisms of progenitor activation. One of the critical questions is whether differentiation is induced prior to or following egress of progenitors from the quiescent niches. One possible scenario suggests that units of regeneration are induced to differentiate within the subendosteal niches, a process associated with cell cycling and variations in receptor profile that fosters egress from this site of residence. In support of this mechanism is the differential activation of distinct patterns of differentiation in various stages of cell cycle of hematopoietic progenitors [8]. Another scenario suggests that units of regeneration are induced to egress from the niche prior to induction of differentiation and adopt different traits upon engagement of developmental niches in central marrow. Supporting evidence is the observation that HSPCs egress periodically from the marrow niches and resume their residence after circulation in peripheral blood, indicating that transient mobilization is not necessarily associated with differentiation [9]. Here we consider the possible involvement of inflammatory and injury signals in mobilization and functional activation of hematopoietic progenitors under physiological and stress conditions, focusing on the activity of interferons and members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily. Several recent reviews have summarized current knowledge on the involvement of stress signals in hematopoietic progenitor activation [2,10–13]. We discuss the possibility that humoral factors are involved in the process of recruitment and activation of stem and progenitor cells. 2. Interferons as signals associated with inflammation Interferons (IFNs) are a family of acute phase reactants secreted primarily by immune cells that promote the conversion of naive to

12

N. Askenasy / Blood Reviews 29 (2015) 11–15

cytotoxic T cells and amplify their activity. Two types of interferons are classified according to the cognate receptors: IFNα, IFNβ and other isotypes bind type I receptor and IFNγ selectively interacts with type II receptor [14]. Initial in vitro studies attributed interferons suppressive effects on hematopoietic progenitors [15–18], although it has been recognized that these cytokines cooperate with other growth factors and chemokines in stimulation of HSPC activity [19–21]. IFNα prompts exit of quiescent progenitors from the Go phase and signaling through the STAT pathway induces gene expression including stem cell antigen (SCA-1) [22]. The versatile activity of IFNα includes phasic exposure that promotes progenitor egress from the dormant state, whereas tonic exposure appears to compromise progenitor activity [22]. Excessive IFNα-dependent activation of progenitors might cause exhaustion, which is prevented by interferon regulatory factor-2 (IRF2), a transcriptional suppressor of type I receptor signaling that modulates the suppressor and stimulatory nature of signal transduction [23]. IFNγ also stimulates the activity of murine hematopoietic progenitors in a STAT-dependent manner [24], evident from persistent stimulation caused by tonic increase in IFNγ levels in response to chronic infections [25] under regulatory activity of IRF1 [26]. Balancing these stimulatory activities of interferons on hematopoietic progenitor proliferation and differentiation in response to viral infections are suppressor activities that prevent detrimental consequences of excessive signaling of these pathways. Inhibitory activities are recognized at several levels. Both type I and II IFN receptors have been associated with preservation of the viability of hematopoietic precursors preventing their extinction without functional inhibition [16,27,28]. Furthermore, IFNα suppresses the development of T and B lymphocytes in the bone marrow [29] and cooperates with Interleukin-7 (IL-7) in regulation of peripheral homeostatic expansion of B lymphocytes [30]. Although IFNγ is a pivotal activator of cytotoxic T cells, it can also mediate negative regulation, possibly to avoid overstimulation of the immune system [31]. Therefore, the role of interferons in fine-tuning of inflammatory reactions and hematopoietic responses includes both stimulatory and inhibitory activities. 3. Tumor necrosis factor family factors associated with injury Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily includes receptor/ligand interactions that are involved in physiological homeostasis of hematopoietic and immune systems, with pleiotropic inductive and suppressive activities [32,33]. TNFα has been initially associated with functional suppression of hematopoietic progenitors [15,17,18] however early reports have already demonstrated variability in responses to this cytokine under various experimental conditions [34–36]. This cytokine, however, has many more roles in physiological and stress hematopoiesis, which can be not classified as purely inhibitory or stimulatory [13]. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells are inherently resistant to apoptosis due to intrinsic molecular configuration regulated at the transcriptional level [37]. These cells are not unresponsive to TNF family members due to absent or low levels of receptor expression, because the receptors are acutely upregulated in response to stress (vide infra). Although apoptotic pathways are well developed in hematopoietic progenitors, dominant transcription and translation of anti-apoptotic factors and the NFκB pathways actively protect cell viability. Sensitivity to apoptosis develops along differentiation of the progenitors and TNF family members become pivotal mediators of negative regulation of mature hematopoietic and immune progeny via activation-induced cell death (AICD). 4. Humoral factors in stress hematopoiesis The physiological sequence of events under stress conditions is initiated by immediate recruitment of the marginal vascular pools of neutrophils mediated by acute stress chemokines and hormones such as cortisol. In parallel, acute inflammatory and injury factors operate at two levels. At first level, differentiated myeloid cells and lymphocytes

are mobilized from the bone marrow to peripheral blood [38,39]. For example, TNFα mobilizes immune cells by downregulation of CCL12 [38] similar to the mechanism of mobilization of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) [40]. At the second level, IFN and TNF stimulate the activity of hematopoietic progenitors in the bone marrow to replenish the acute decline in available pools of immune cells. In fact, members of TNF superfamily such as Fas, TNFα and TNF-related apoptosisinducing ligand (TRAIL), as well as the type I and II IFN receptors trigger trophic signals in most primitive stem and progenitor cells, which are resistant to apoptotic signaling through these receptors [27,28,37,41, 42]. The exact signaling pathways dissociating apoptotic and trophic signaling in progenitors and the changes in wiring of these pathways along the differentiation process are yet unknown. IFN and TNF are non-specific stimulants of hematopoietic progenitors that synergize with other growth factors in recruitment on colony forming units and enhancement of their development. The inductive activities of these cytokines are maximized by cooperation of TNFα with IL-1β and G-CSF and of IFNγ with IL-3 [19–21,38,42]. These cytokines are therefore best viewed as non-specific stimulants that recruit and activate progenitors residing in the quiescent niches rendering them responsive to other growth signals. In this capacity, IFN and TNF participate in awakening of dormant progenitors within the marrow niche [2] and serve as coupling mechanisms between inflammation and injury, and stimulation of hematopoiesis. Activation of hematopoietic progenitors is associated with wide variations in patterns of expression of intracellular molecules and cell surface receptors. Unlike transient spontaneous mobilization of progenitors that periodically enter peripheral circulation and resume their marrow residence [9], activated progenitors resume activity at sites that encourage proliferation and differentiation [7]. Phenotypic dynamics that modulate progenitor behavior may be rather non-specific and associated with cell cycle [5,6], may result from activation of inherent patterns of gene expression such as NFκB activation by TNFα [13], or mediated by induction of distinct molecules such as SCA-1 by interferons [43,44]. Notably, responses to TNF family members depend on the time of exposure, with differential activation of sets of genes under phasic and tonic stimulation of the NFκB pathways [45,46]. 5. Are interferons and TNF family members involved in physiological hematopoiesis? In differentiated hematopoietic and immune cells, the TNF receptors are ubiquitous negative regulators of expanding clones, controlling the intensity of the immune reaction through AICD [13]. In variance, IFNs stimulate immune cells as a mechanism of amplification of the immune reaction [10–12], although under certain conditions they also restrain immune reactivity [25,29–31]. Despite these differences in distal stages of differentiation, their activity in proximal stages of differentiation is similar: stimulation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell activity. The two signaling pathways described above couple hematopoietic activity to inflammation (IFN) and injury (TNF). The physiological significance of signaling cytokines is questioned by the demonstration that deficient transgenes do not display overt hematopoietic abnormalities, though increased numbers of progenitors might disclose functional deficiency [22,25,47,48]. However, deficiencies in IFNs [25,26,49] and TNFs [48,50,51] result in impaired competitive murine engraftment, assigning these cytokines significant roles in hematopoietic progenitor function. Confounding results showing a competitive advantage of IFNγ-deficient progenitors have been explained on the basis of increased fractions of quiescent cells that correspond to the main engrafting subset [25,52], as also demonstrated for progenitors deficient in the transcriptional repressor IRF2 of type I receptor signaling [22]. Likewise, in contrast to failure of progenitors deficient in TNF receptors to generate durable reconstitution [51], this deficiency has been associated with superior reconstituting activity following whole bone marrow cell transplants [53]. These discrepancies may be related either

N. Askenasy / Blood Reviews 29 (2015) 11–15

to deficient function of auxiliary cells supporting engraftment in the absence of TNFα [50,54], or extended survival of the peripheral progeny due to defective negative regulation [48]. These data emphasize involvement of IFN and TNF in physiological hematopoiesis and reconstitution following transplantation. It is tempting to speculate a link and possibly coordinated activity of interferons and TNF family members. TNFα is released under conditions of injury, including immune cells and hematopoietic progenitors themselves [50,54], as a mechanism aiming to eliminate viable but dysfunctional injured cells. Consequently, inflammatory reactions to infections are elaborated by chemokines and cytokines responsible for amplification of immune reactivity, largely known as signal 3, also responsible for clearance of debris at sites of injury. At the level of the bone marrow as the main site of effective hematopoiesis, IFN and TNF are independent signaling pathways that converge to activate precursors and launch the process of regeneration and immune-hematopoietic reconstitution.

6. Are hematopoietic progenitors responsive to extrinsic signals? Quiescent human hematopoietic progenitors display transcription of a variety of receptors of the TNF family, including Fas (TNFRSF6), TNF receptor-1 (TNFRSF1A), TNF repceptor-2 (TNFRSF1B), OX40 (TNFRSF4), TRAIL receptors 1 (TNFRSF10A), 2 (TNFRSF10B) and 4 (TNFRSF10D), and DR6 (TNFRSF21) [37,55–58]. These receptors are detected by flow cytometry in 10–25% fresh CD34+ progenitors derived from the prevalent human cell sources (umbilical cord blood, mobilized peripheral blood and bone marrow) and are variably expressed under culture conditions, but invariably upregulated following transplantation [37,41,42]. The functional signaling receptor for transduction of trophic signals in progenitors and apoptosis in the differentiated progeny is TNF-R1 with unknown function of TNF-R2. This latter receptor is acutely upregulated under stress conditions and its deficiency causes failure of engraftment suggesting involvement in hematopoiesis [51]. Likewise, hematopoietic progenitors display transcriptional and translational expression of type I and II IFN receptors [28,59,60]. Identification of components of the IFN and TNF signal transduction pathways points to functional competence of signal transduction upon receptor activation in non-cycling progenitors [37,60]. Furthermore, unstimulated hematopoietic progenitors express receptors associated with the canonical (adaptive) NFκB pathway including T cell receptor (TCR), toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4), and receptors for transforming growth factor-β (TGF-βR) and IL-1β [61,62], as well as the non-canonical (developmental) NFκB pathway including CD40 (TNFRSF5), and receptors for lymphotoxin β (LTβR, TNFRSF3) and B-cell activating factor (BAFFR, TNFRSF13C) [55,56,58]. The non-canonical NFκB pathway has been associated with myeloid differentiation of progenitors, however consistent with the proposition that the initial role of these receptors is progenitor activation rather than directing differentiation, inhibition of either one of the NFκB pathways did not impair particular differentiation traits [63]. Consistent with decreased competitive engraftment of progenitors deficient in these signaling pathways, the significance of TNF family receptors in hematopoiesis is best emphasized by acute upregulation under conditions of stress. The most primitive murine precursors including c-kit+SCA-1+lineage− and the small-sized elutriated fractions ubiquitously upregulate Fas, TNF and TRAIL receptors soon after transplantation [41,51,64]. Receptor upregulation is in fact a conserved response within the immune-hematopoietic system, best recognized by induction of the TNF family receptors by nuclear NFAT factor of activated T cells (NFAT) rendering them susceptible to negative regulation [65]. Likewise, activation of the NFκB pathways by the TNF receptors results in upregulation of Fas and TRAIL receptors [66], though the mechanism of crosstalk inductive interaction is yet unidentified [67]. Unlike apoptotic signaling in mature hematopoietic and immune cells, these receptors transduce primarily trophic signals in human

13

hematopoietic progenitors, enhancing engraftment and hematopoietic reconstitution [37,41,42]. 7. Implications of stress signaling in hematological pathologies An intriguing pathophysiological aspect of these cytokines is the possible causal relationship to defective hematopoiesis in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), aplastic anemia (AA) and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) [11–14]. The traditional view of inhibitory activities of IFN and TNF on hematopoietic progenitors along identification of higher levels of these cytokines in these patients suggests their active participation in these pathological disorders. However mounting evidence of stimulatory effects of IFN and TNF on hematopoietic progenitors supports an alternative explanation: high levels of these cytokines and expression of the receptors reflect efforts of the hematopoietic compartment to recover from hypoplasia [68,69]. Consistently, the signaling pathways in progenitors from patients suffering of these disorders display increased activity of the signaling pathways [70,71]. This scenario is similar to the supportive impact of IFN receptors on hematopoietic responses to persistent infection [22,25,27]. Although these disorders are caused by aberrant immune reactions [72], hematopoietic progenitors do not display increased susceptibility to apoptosis or dysfunction [73] similar to healthy progenitors [28]. The nature of additional co-factors cooperating in suppression of HSPC activity along IFN and TNF remains to be deciphered [15–18] particularly in view of demonstration of such inhibitory signals in single cells [16], because unknown factors released from apoptotic cells inhibit clonogenic activity in culture [37]. 8. Concluding remarks Inflammatory and injury signals participate in regulation of hematopoietic homeostasis under stress conditions. Our preferred scenario suggests that IFNα/β and IFNγ stimulate proliferation of hematopoietic progenitors within the quiescent niches. Genotypic and phenotypic consequences of proliferation render the progenitors responsive to growth factors and chemokines: HSPCs egress from the quiescent niches and resume their initial residence after circulation in peripheral blood or are anchored by differentiation niches in central marrow. Both interferons and TNF family members transduce non-specific activating signals in hematopoietic progenitors resistant to apoptosis without directing towards particular differentiation traits. In this capacity, the reversible stimulatory activities of these factors couple hematopoiesis at the level of stem and progenitor cells to systemic demand under conditions of inflammation and injury. A particular case is injury/inflammation to the bone marrow, where these mechanisms are evidently amplified and result in vigorous local reactions. Considering almost unlimited reconstituting capacity of hematopoietic progenitors, it is unlikely that these factors per se mediate extinction of the progenitor pools unless converging with other (yet unidentified) inhibitory factors. Conflict of interest The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. References [1] Bowie MB, McKnight KD, Kent DG, McCaffrey L, Hoodless PA, Eaves CJ. Hematopoietic stem cells proliferate until after birth and show a reversible phase-specific engraftment defect. J Clin Invest 2006;116:2808–16. [2] Trumpp A, Essers M, Wilson A. Awakening dormant haematopoietic stem cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:201–9. [3] Wilson A, Laurenti E, Oser G, van der Wath RC, Blanco-Bose W, Jaworski M, et al. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell 2008;135:1118–29. [4] Goldberg LR, Dooner MS, Johnson KW, Papa EF, Pereira MG, Del Tatto M, et al. The murine long-term multi-lineage renewal marrow stem cell is a cycling cell. Leukemia 2014;28:813–22.

14

N. Askenasy / Blood Reviews 29 (2015) 11–15

[5] Reddy GP, McAuliffe CI, Pang L, Quesenberry PJ, Bertoncello I. Cytokine receptor repertoire and cytokine responsiveness of Ho(dull)/Rh(dull) stem cells with differing potentials for G1/S phase progression. Exp Hematol 2002;30:792–800. [6] Colvin GA, Dooner MS, Dooner GJ, Sanchez-Guijo FM, Demers DA, Abedi M, et al. Stem cell continuum: directed differentiation hotspots. Exp Hematol 2007;35: 96–107. [7] Yaniv I, Stein J, Farkas DL, Askenasy N. The tale of early hematopoietic cell seeding in the bone marrow niche. Stem Cells Dev 2006;15:4–16. [8] Quesenberry PJ. The continuum model of marrow stem cell regulation. Curr Opin Hematol 2006;13:216–21. [9] Bhattacharya D, Czechowicz A, Ooi AG, Rossi DJ, Bryder D, Weissman IL. Niche recycling through division-independent egress of hematopoietic stem cells. J Exp Med 2009;206:2837–50. [10] King KY, Goodell MA. Inflammatory modulation of HSCs: viewing the HSC as a foundation for the immune response. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11:685–92. [11] Takizawa H, Boettcher S, Manz MG. Demand-adapted regulation of early hematopoiesis in infection and inflammation. Blood 2012;119:2991–3002. [12] Schuettpelz LG, Link DC. Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell activity by inflammation. Front Immunol 2013;4:204. [13] Mizrahi K, Askenasy N. Physiological functions of TNF family receptor/ligand interactions in hematopoiesis and transplantation. Blood 2014;124:176–83. [14] Platanias LC. Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 2005;5:375–86. [15] Broxmeyer HE, Williams DE, Lu L, Cooper S, Anderson SL, Beyer GS, et al. The suppressive influences of human tumor necrosis factors on bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor cells from normal donors and patients with leukemia: synergism of tumor necrosis factor and interferon-gamma. J Immunol 1986;136:4487–95. [16] Snoeck HW, Van Bockstaele DR, Nys G, Lenjou M, Lardon F, Haenen L, et al. Interferon gamma selectively inhibits very primitive CD342+ CD38− and not more mature CD34+ CD38+ human hematopoietic progenitor cells. J Exp Med 1994;180:1177–82. [17] Maciejewski J, Selleri C, Anderson S, Young NS. Fas antigen expression on CD34+ human marrow cells is induced by interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha and potentiates cytokine-mediated hematopoietic suppression in vitro. Blood 1995;85:3183–90. [18] Selleri C, Sato T, Anderson S, Young NS, Maciejewski JP. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha suppress both early and late stages of hematopoiesis and induce programmed cell death. J Cell Physiol 1995;165:538–46. [19] Kawano Y, Takaue Y, Hirao A, Abe T, Saito S, Matsunaga K, et al. Synergistic effect of recombinant interferon-gamma and interleukin-3 on the growth of immature human hematopoietic progenitors. Blood 1991;77:2118–21. [20] Caux C, Moreau I, Saeland S, Banchereau J. Interferon-gamma enhances factordependent myeloid proliferation of human CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 1992;79:2628–35. [21] Brugger W, Mocklin W, Heimfeld S, Berenson RJ, Mertelsmann R, Kanz L. Ex vivo expansion of enriched peripheral blood CD34+ progenitor cells by stem cell factor, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), IL-6, IL-3, interferon-gamma, and erythropoietin. Blood 1993;81:2579–84. [22] Essers MA, Offner S, Blanco-Bose WE, Waibler Z, Kalinke U, Duchosal MA, et al. IFNalpha activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature 2009;458: 904–8. [23] Sato T, Onai N, Yoshihara H, Arai F, Suda T, Ohteki T. Interferon regulatory factor-2 protects quiescent hematopoietic stem cells from type I interferon-dependent exhaustion. Nat Med 2009;15:696–700. [24] Zhao X, Ren G, Liang L, Ai PZ, Zheng B, Tischfield JA, et al. Brief report: interferongamma induces expansion of Lin(−)Sca-1(+)C-Kit(+) cells. Stem Cells 2010;28: 122–6. [25] Baldridge MT, King KY, Boles NC, Weksberg DC, Goodell MA. Quiescent haematopoietic stem cells are activated by IFN-gamma in response to chronic infection. Nature 2010;465:793–7. [26] Sato T, Selleri C, Young NS, Maciejewski JP. Inhibition of interferon regulatory factor-1 expression results in predominance of cell growth stimulatory effects of interferongamma due to phosphorylation of Stat1 and Stat3. Blood 1997;90:4749–58. [27] Hwang JH, Kim SW, Lee HJ, Yun HJ, Kim S, Jo DY, et al. Interferon gamma has dual potential in inhibiting or promoting survival and growth of hematopoietic progenitors: interactions with stromal cell-derived factor 1. Int J Hematol 2006;84:143–50. [28] Taylor D, Wilkison M, Voyich J, Meissner N. Prevention of bone marrow cell apoptosis and regulation of hematopoiesis by type I IFNs during systemic responses to pneumocystis lung infection. J Immunol 2011;186:5956–67. [29] Lin Q, Dong C, Cooper MD. Impairment of T and B cell development by treatment with a type I interferon. J Exp Med 1998;187:79–87. [30] Wang J, Lin Q, Langston H, Cooper MD. Resident bone marrow macrophages produce type 1 interferons that can selectively inhibit interleukin-7-driven growth of B lineage cells. Immunity 1995;3:475–84. [31] Dalton DK, Haynes L, Chu CQ, Swain SL, Wittmer S. Interferon gamma eliminates responding CD4 T cells during mycobacterial infection by inducing apoptosis of activated CD4 T cells. J Exp Med 2000;192:117–22. [32] Aggarwal BB. Signalling pathways of the TNF superfamily: a double-edged sword. Nat Rev Immunol 2003;3:745–56. [33] Aggarwal BB, Gupta SC, Kim JH. Historical perspectives on tumor necrosis factor and its superfamily: 25 years later, a golden journey. Blood 2012;119:651–65. [34] Backx B, Broeders L, Bot FJ, Löwenberg B. Positive and negative effects of tumor necrosis factor on colony growth from highly purified normal marrow progenitors. Leukemia 1991;5:66–70. [35] Caux C, Favre C, Saeland S, Duvert V, Durand I, Mannoni P, et al. Potentiation of early hematopoiesis by tumor necrosis factor-alpha is followed by inhibition of granulopoietic differentiation and proliferation. Blood 1991;78:635–44.

[36] Rusten LS, Jacobsen FW, Lesslauer W, Loetscher H, Smeland EB, Jacobsen SE. Bifunctional effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) on the growth of mature and primitive human hematopoietic progenitor cells: Involvement of p55 and p75 TNF receptors. Blood 1994;83:3152–9. [37] Mizrahi K, Kagan S, Stein J, Yaniv I, Zipori D, Askenasy N. Resistance of hematopoietic progenitors to Fas-mediated apoptosis is actively sustained by NFκB with a characteristic transcriptional signature. Stem Cells Dev 2014;23:676–86. [38] Ueda Y, Yang K, Foster SJ, Kondo M, Kelsoe G. Inflammation controls B lymphopoiesis by regulating chemokine CXCL12 expression. J Exp Med 2004;199:47–58. [39] Lim JY, Gerber SA, Murphy SP, Lord EM. Type I interferons induced by radiation therapy mediate recruitment and effector function of CD8(+) T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2014;63:259–71. [40] Petit I, Szyper-Kravitz M, Nagler A, Lahav M, Peled A, Habler L, et al. G-CSF induces stem cell mobilization by decreasing bone marrow SDF-1 and up-regulating CXCR4. Nat Immunol 2002;3:687–94. [41] Mizrahi K, Stein J, Pearl-Yafe M, Kaplan O, Yaniv I, Askenasy N. Regulatory functions of TRAIL in hematopoietic progenitors: human umbilical cord blood and murine bone marrow transplantation. Leukemia 2010;24:1325–34. [42] Mizrahi K, Stein J, Yaniv I, Kaplan O, Askenasy N. TNF-α has tropic rather than apoptotic activity in human hematopoietic progenitors: involvement of TNF receptor-1 and caspase-8. Stem Cells 2013;31:156–66. [43] Dumont FJ, Coker LZ. Interferon-alpha/beta enhances the expression of Ly-6 antigens on T cells in vivo and in vitro. Eur J Immunol 1986;16:735–40. [44] Malek TR, Danis KM, Codias EK. Tumor necrosis factor synergistically acts with IFNgamma to regulate Ly-6A/E expression in T lymphocytes, thymocytes and bone marrow cells. J Immunol 1989;142:1929–36. [45] Hoffmann A, Levchenko A, Scott ML, Baltimore D. The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. Science 2002;298:1241–5. [46] Nelson DE, Ihekwaba AE, Elliott M, Johnson JR, Gibney CA, Foreman BE, et al. Oscillations in NF-kappaB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science 2004;306:704–8. [47] Zhang Y, Harada A, Bluethmann H, Wang JB, Nakao S, Mukaida N, et al. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a physiologic regulator of hematopoietic progenitor cells: increase of early hematopoietic progenitor cells in TNF receptor p55-deficient mice in vivo and potent inhibition of progenitor cell proliferation by TNFα in vitro. Blood 1995; 86:2930–7. [48] Rebel VI, Hartnett S, Hill GR, Lazo-Kallanian SB, Ferrara JL, Sieff CA. Essential role for the p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor in regulating hematopoiesis at a stem cell level. J Exp Med 1999;190:1493–504. [49] Hartner JC, Walkley CR, Lu J, Orkin SH. ADAR1 is essential for the maintenance of hematopoiesis and suppression of interferon signaling. Nat Immunol 2009;10:109–15. [50] Rezzoug F, Huang Y, Tanner MK, Wysoczynski M, Schanie CL, Chilton PM, et al. TNFalpha is critical to facilitate hemopoietic stem cell engraftment and function. J Immunol 2008;180:49–57. [51] Pearl-Yafe M, Mizrahi K, Stein J, Yolcu ES, Kaplan O, Shirwan H, et al. Tumor necrosis factor receptors support murine hematopoietic progenitor function in the early stages of engraftment. Stem Cells 2010;28:1270–80. [52] MacNamara KC, Jones M, Martin O, Winslow GM. Transient activation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by IFNγ during acute bacterial infection. PLoS One 2011;6: e28669. [53] Pronk CJ, Veiby OP, Bryder D, Jacobsen SE. Tumor necrosis factor restricts hematopoietic stem cell activity in mice: involvement of two distinct receptors. J Exp Med 2011;208:1563–70. [54] Majka M, Janowska-Wieczorek A, Ratajczak J, Ehrenman K, Pietrzkowski Z, Kowalska MA, et al. Numerous growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines are secreted by human CD34(+) cells, myeloblasts, erythroblasts, and megakaryoblasts and regulate normal hematopoiesis in an autocrine/paracrine manner. Blood 2001;97:3075–85. [55] Tao W, Hangoc G, Hawes JW, Si Y, Cooper S, Broxmeyer HE. Profiling of differentially expressed apoptosis-related genes by cDNA arrays in human cord blood CD34+ cells treated with etoposide. Exp Hematol 2003;31:251–60. [56] Ng YY, van Kessel B, Lokhorst HM, Baert MR, van den Burg CM, Bloem AC, et al. Gene-expression profiling of CD34+ cells from various hematopoietic stem-cell sources reveals functional differences in stem-cell activity. J Leukoc Biol 2004;75: 314–23. [57] Jaatinen T, Hemmoranta H, Hautaniemi S, Niemi J, Nicorici D, Laine J, et al. Global gene expression profile of human cord blood-derived CD133+ cells. Stem Cells 2006;24:631–41. [58] Panepucci RA, Calado RT, Rocha V, Proto-Siqueira R, Silva WA, Zago MA. Higher expression of transcription targets and components of the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway is a distinctive feature of umbilical cord blood CD34+ precursors. Stem Cells 2007;25:189–96. [59] Giron-Michel J, Weill D, Bailly G, Legras S, Nardeux PC, Azzarone B, et al. Direct signal transduction via functional interferon-alphabeta receptors in CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia 2002;16:1135–42. [60] Venezia TA, Merchant AA, Ramos CA, Whitehouse NL, Young AS, Shaw CA, et al. Molecular signatures of proliferation and quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells. PLoS Biol 2004;2:e301. [61] Graf L, Heimfeld S, Torok-Storb B. Comparison of gene expression in CD34+ cells from bone marrow and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood by high-density oligonucleotide array analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2001;7:486–94. [62] De Waele M, Renmans W, Asosingh K, Vander Gucht K, Van Riet I. Growth factor receptor profile of CD34 cells in normal bone marrow, cord blood and mobilized peripheral blood. Eur J Haematol 2004;72:193–202. [63] De Molfetta GA, Lucíola Zanette D, Alexandre Panepucci R, Dos Santos AR, da Silva WA, Antonio Zago M. Role of NFKB2 on the early myeloid differentiation of CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Differentiation 2010;80:195–203.

N. Askenasy / Blood Reviews 29 (2015) 11–15 [64] Pearl-Yafe M, Stein J, Yolcu ES, Farkas DL, Shirwan H, Yaniv I, et al. Fas transduces dual apoptotic and trophic signals in hematopoietic progenitors. Stem Cells 2007; 25:3194–203. [65] Askenasy N, Yolcu ES, Yaniv I, Shirwan H. Fas-ligand as a double-edged immunomodulator to induce transplantation tolerance. Blood 2005;105:1396–404. [66] Karin M, Lin A. NF-kappaB at the crossroads of life and death. Nat Immunol 2002;3: 221–7. [67] Mizrahi K, Askenasy N. Activation and crosstalk between TNF family receptors in umbilical cord blood cells is not responsible for loss of engraftment capacity following culture. Am J Stem Cells 2013;2:155–64. [68] Kitagawa M, Saito I, Kuwata T, Yoshida S, Yamaguchi S, Takahashi M, et al. Overexpression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interferon (IFN)-gamma by bone marrow cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 1997;11:2049–54. [69] Sloand E, Kim S, Maciejewski JP, Tisdale J, Follmann D, Young NS. Intracellular interferon-gamma in circulating and marrow T cells detected by flow cytometry

[70]

[71]

[72] [73]

15

and the response to immunosuppressive therapy in patients with aplastic anemia. Blood 2002;100:1185–91. Chen G, Zeng W, Miyazato A, Billings E, Maciejewski JP, Kajigaya S, et al. Distinctive gene expression profiles of CD34 cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome characterized by specific chromosomal abnormalities. Blood 2004;104:4210–8. Zeng W, Miyazato A, Chen G, Kajigaya S, Young NS, Maciejewski JP. Interferongamma-induced gene expression in CD34 cells: identification of pathologic cytokine-specific signature profiles. Blood 2006;107:167–75. Young NS, Scheinberg P, Calado RT. Aplastic anemia. Curr Opin Hematol 2008;15: 162–8. Welsh JP, Rutherford TR, Flynn J, Foukaneli T, Gordon-Smith EC, Gibson FM. In vitro effects of interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on CD34+ bone marrow progenitor cells from aplastic anemia patients and normal donors. Hematol J 2004;5:39–46.