Interplay between industrial print advertising and culture

Interplay between industrial print advertising and culture

Interplay between Industrial Print Advertising and Culture Carin Holmquist and Agnda Jtirgensen Carlsiiii In a pilot study rhe industrial culture...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 85 Views

Interplay between Industrial Print Advertising and Culture Carin Holmquist and Agnda Jtirgensen Carlsiiii In

a pilot

study

rhe

industrial

culture

changes

in industrial

Industrial

through

in wends

of a

The

ture.

cultures.

indicators

such

between

1969 and

systems,

from

to effectiveness. are discussed

We

argue

Instead, which

that

changes makes

changes

print

advertising

content

analysis

of national

culture

and

to

study

Changes

as changes

in industrial in industrial

~ and as a culture

were

advertising

and

material nature.

changes

culture

used

as a subsystem

to whole

efficiency

industrial

We

in Sweden.

is treated

of organizational

observed

parts

between

examined.

advertising

culture

metasystem

interplay

was

Relations

between

relations

between

may

be a mirror

might

of changes

culture

different

from

and

and

upon

from

industrial

indicators

or molder

be looked

in advertising

themes:

relations

overall

as are

not

in three

to interactive

media

in advertising

studies

1979 arc described

one-sided

of cul-

of changes.

as early

warnings,

as an indicator

of cultural

essential.

Marketing

theory

marketing.

was earlier

However,

increasing

interest,

based

industrial

and various

as industrial

marketing

(Kotler

&

Levy,

Snehota,

1976).

gained

theories of consumer

as well

have evolved during the last decades

1969;

Bagozzi,

cies have specialized

in industrial

mercial

There

marketing

culture.

on consumer has

At the same time,

advertising.

mostly

marketing

Hikansson

&

advertising

agen-

and non-com-

has evolved a specific industrial

One expression

trial print advertising

1975;

many advertising

of this is found in indus-

in media directed

towards

the indus-

try. The change

of the marketing

total change

of organizational

concept

is only a part of the

culture.

Organizational

ture, in turn, is only a subsystem ture.

Several

studies

have

cators of social change. frequently

ate changes organizational

marketing

marketing,

culture

of change

by profession

in cul-

perceptu-

we think that the interplay presented

in mass media, and

could be of research

interest.

Indus-

expressed

in mass

media

since mass media’s

interplay

with society as a whole

Journal oj’Management Studies.

and

February

been analyzed

1985

indicators

that marketers

at an early stage,

between industrial

0 1985 Scandinavian

indi-

Mass media is one of the indicators

in finding

ture. As we assume

terest,

social cul-

on finding

studied.

We are interested

trial

of the overall

concentrated

cul-

with

subcultures

such

in several

is of special

as organizational

studies

(Katz

culture

& Szecksii,

inhas

1981). 181

HOLMQUIS’I’

Our

& JiiRGENSEN

aim is to analyze

advertising

and

relevance

of future

play between and with

on mass for the

culture

is

and social

of the

a brief

change.

This

of studies

article.

The -

forward.

These

are

print

advertising

advertising,

discussed.

Finally

and for further

three

we propose

form

in

trends

to changes

in

The connections

and overall

some

the

changes

summary

compared

indicators

of

together

of industrial of

in a pilot study.

other

part

concept

presented then

culture

overview

on culture

are

industrial

the

on the inter-

industrial

indicators

culture

between

by giving

ideas

Different

industrial put

to further

We start overview

rest

print

to denote

in this field. advertising,

discussed.

industrial

We want

print

media

the following

basis

arc

research

culture.

between

culture.

we also want

industrial

overall

studies

the interplay

industrial

In this article

CARLSijij

ideas

culture

on the

are

relations

research.

Mass Media and Social Change Advertising

as a cultural

by several

authors

Swedish

setting

indicators.* the

of

interest

programme

sub-prqjects

between

been studied

Of special

research

the

relation

has recently

1981).

is a large

One

examines

indicator

(Berman,

of

the

advertising

in a

on cultural *

programme

and

changes

in

‘l‘his

rrsrarch

Indicatora: 1945-1975“.

society. sign,

The

project

leading

& Andrkn,

mass

media

single

way. kinds

tors, types discuss

and

of media

of media

different

on the social

causes

He proposes

change. of social

question

of media

relations

of the relationship

as agents

The

of the programme,

social

must

and

change

that

types

etc. If this is done,

between

cultural

or society

be broken

different

that as

can be answered

in

down

into

of society

sec-

then it is possible

structures

and

to

the struc-

ture of society. The

main

has been

interest

of the

the changes

and the relationsship on social arc

structure

needed

between

mass

develop

such aspects

time

Swedish

research types

have traditionally 182

research

in mass these

series

system

judgements

and

social

and

society,

time series

of mass

on the

media

relationsship

structure.

Attempts

sectors

of culture

for various

of social

programme

media

two. Various

on the value

making media

various Three

between and

when

Swedish

of values

structure

are

made

within

to and the

programme. of relationsship been

between

mentioned:

culture

and

startrd

catersthat

can

drscription

of changes

bol systtTl

society

“Cultural

programme Swedish in

Symbol 1976.

the proqramme is 10develop

of advertis-

on the subject

is not a question

of changes

as a cultural

1981).

an overview

the question one

advertising

( 1981), who is coordinator

Rosengrcn has presented

an agent

print

to hypotheses

ing (Nowak

between

reviews

The

be

usrd

‘l‘hr cultural

System aim

of

indi-

in a quantitative

in the Swedish

sym-

ADVERTISI_NG _ cultural _ culture _ social In

autonomy as influence structure

analyzing

structure, often

the

means

structure

value

few

connection

between

of value

is central.

orientation,

empirical

guidelines

in order

research

traditions

in this field.

(Shaw

& McCombs,

1980)

has specialized

1976).

is studied

been

the

and society. is one

social

etc,

i.e. a

conducted

theories

In spite Research

in the interplay

lic. Interplay

and

in this respect

opinion

to test

mass

culture Value

attitude, have

between

(materialism)

(Peterson,

studies

media

(idealism)

on culture

of level of abstraction

Very these

on social

as influence

the notion

question

AND CULTURE

along

of interplay

of this there on agenda

example

between

of studies

media

as to subjects,

exist setting that

and the pub-

attitudes

and

opin-

ions.

( 198 1) shows

Rosengren in four

theoretically

that

possible

time

series

data

relationships

can result

between

media

and society: Development Media IDEALISM Media

led by Both or neither

Society MATEKIALISM

as

Media

molders

INTERDEPENDECE Media as molders

as lag-

and mirrors

ging molders

Yes Similarity between media and society time series AUTONOMY No

Media

Figure 1. Relationship ture (Rosengren,

Rosengren

(1981) However, publication

of Advertising), analyzed

tising

and

society

Similar tisements

“I

over

annonsernas

“a review

to is

the title of a

spegel”

tradition

of one

the idea of linkage -

rela-

referred (In

the

as early as 1964. Kihlberg

advertising

a period

possible

of relation

As an examle,

published

the print

also reveals

one hundred

1970).

was

theoretically

type

as a mirror.

Mirror

newspaper

four

the main

Swedish

subtitle

nor molders

between mass media content and social struc-

suggests

the advertisement

(1964)

mirrors

198 1) .

tionships.

daily

as neithw

in a Swedish

hundred between

of changes

years.

The

print

adver-

of society

during

years”. ideas

arc also found

made

by literature

Print

advertising

in content scientists

is regarded

analyses (Jonsson

as a mirror

of adver& Jonsson, of changes 183

HOLMQUIST

in taste

&JORGENSEN

and

Jonsson

social

(1970)

values.

CARLSijb

On the other

emphasize

body’s

art”

-

not

values,

but also create

that

only

Jonsson

advertisements

affect

them,

hand,

our

social

i.e. function

-

and

“every-

system

and

as both

our

mirror

and

molder. Nowak

and

And&

(1981)

tisements

as mirrors

but

a misleading

with

this, the mirror actively

agree

affects

society.

contributes changes

in print

social

have

aspects.

image

studied

advertising

changes

is a mirror

As a consequence

is not a passive

selected

to a misleading (1981)

that

have

of

one -

it

of a systemat-

Advertising

of reality.

the

content

they

of adver-

advertising

image.

The effect is the result

of certain

Andrtn

the subject

that

mirror

effect of advertising

ic reflection

The

and

discuss

thus

Nowak

and

relationship

between

and changes

in society.

analysed

arc material

as

well as immaterial. In

empirical

studies,

concentrated

material

changes

in the cultural and

tween

the material

some

degree.

become

more

structural similar effect

on

appeared reflection tive enough to

Although

change.

change

reinforces

the

status

quo.

we find

to development

people

though

their

percen-

might

at least

in society;

change was also

advertising.

have

a profes-

in traditional

findings

media

as

function

signs

three

roles.

of advertisments

development

the design

be a

old is not attrac-

of print

also

The

rather

of the material

could

are

(198 1) have influenced

To summarize

184

there

by a lag

Emancipation

same

a

did not find a

of women

advertising

but

reflects

older

the content

the

As far as this

few

still presented that

shows

In this sense,

of social

than

development

conclude

extent

like have

1981).

and growing

number

only to people,

the

directly

This

in advertising. the

are generally

The authors a certain

media

in

an increasing

sion, women

AndrCn

climate

Old people

to appear trace

the

and

be explained

even

has increased.

of the cultural structure.

structure

and

Very

advertisements

in be-

the authors

climate.

trends

well-situated

partly

as

have

A correlation

& Andrin,

could

cultural

tage of the population

linear

advertising where

and well

was found

classes

(Nowak

correlation

in the

in social

prestige,

have

They

rare in advertisements.

change

the

long-term

income

of changes

direct

as

of the country.

of social

is concerned,

types

society

of advertising of

higher

and more

social

Other

advertisements

between

Symbols

of change

between Swedish

development

to the

( 1981)

AndrCn

of advertisements.

of the content

references

hard

in climate

the content

development

kind

changes

the relationship

society

and

on the interplay

certain analyzed

Nowak

as an agent

that of

to social

advertising Nowak

and

of our pilot study. ways

of connecting

as molders,

media

ADVERTISING as mirrors

or media

AND CULTURE

as autonomous.

As was

discussed

above, none of these different views has so far been shown to be more relevant

than the others.

The Concept of Culture During ture

the last decades,

has

There

increased,

are

aspects

especially

are

the interest

especially

given

three

fields

attention.

behaviour

tevant,

1962) Secondly,

tural setting,

(Clegg,

ness people tance

research

was opened,

stede, 1980; Hickson Today,

runs a

brought

in behaviour

as well as of the impor-

of cross-cultural

& MacMillan,

field of

studies

(Hof-

1981).

awareness

in the sense mentioned

a

of busi-

A new organizational

that

cul-

to surface

the seventies

countries,

there is a growing

of culture

(1980),

as opposed

Thirdly,

differences.

& Stur-

in organizational

to Foucault

of the differences

in different

of these

(1971)

1975).

cultural

(Gladwin

tradition

of deep structure

awareness

the

anthropologists,

the study of different

is the structuralistic

structuring growing

the

setting.

following

theory. From Levi-Strauss

of culstudies.

in the field of understanding

in its specific

line of knowledge

in which

Firstly,

have made great contributions human

in the concept

in organizational

of the consequences

above.

In addition

to cul-

tural aspects on a macro level, we also find a trend of studies on cultural

aspects on a micro level. Here we find terms like

organizational shared

culture,

meanings,

organizational

special

language,

myths, rituals,

paradigms, etc.

to be of

interest. One

of the few definitions

“Culture

is the system

accepted

meanings

time.

This

interprets

system

of. .

operating of terms,

a people’s

of organizational such publicly

culture

is

and collectively

for a given group at a given forms,

categories,

own situation

and images

to themselves”

(Petti-

grew, 1979). One of the main factors cultural

underlying

the present

issues is the growing internationalization

tion and trade.

The

concept

understand

the non-material

immaterial

context

use of language,

includes

of culture

is used in trying to

world of organizations. transformations

to Pcttigrew

study of the creation Hofstede

(1982)

programming that culture

(1979)

and change

is nothing

vidual, instead

culture

cultures

on a macro level.

much would be gained by the

defines culture

of the people

This

of meanings,

myths and the like. Organizational

are more easy to follow than are cultures According

stress on of produc-

of organizational

cultures.

as “the collective

in an environment”.

that can be attributed

mental

He states to one indi-

is defined for a group of individuals. 185

HOLMQUIST

& JiiRGENSEN

Culture

is a rigid

ginally

and slowly.

structure. This

of cultural

values

imbedded

in practically

stede

(1980)

Changes

made

a study

dimensions

of culture:

ance

(the degree

Power

and Masculinity-Femininity Hofstede

(1980)

the cultural

differences

he expects zations. notice

these The

and

collective

and

He

describes

grammes,

several

ments.

A model

reservation used

for statements offering

First,

individualism wealth, waves, masculinity

dominating

is

industrial

Formation culture)

should

industrial

Hofstede

is reluctrends.

negatively

is increased

in such

on the increase

be

to

is fluctuating

an

increasing

culture

in (since

cultural

the nation(s),

and

and

on industry

on the basis earlier

as collectively inside

culture from

the interplay

and industrial

on the concepts

are found

Industrial

to be to “analyze

within

as discussed

values

zations.

being

a

to be

longer-term

correlate

advertising

be studied

Building

change

These

With

a period

avoidance to

stated print

of values

discussed. social

said

is put forth.

distance

now

pro-

or docu-

Culture

aim was earlier

between

power

mental

value.

Industrial Our

to

of

of speech

on

uncertaity

anxiety

studying

changes,

said

while

Second,

long-term 1965),

is

to

talks

programming.

too short

speculations

on organi-

(1980)

mental

of culture

on cultural

some

impact

analysis

covers

though

arc the hardest

Hofstcde of

is content

caring).

of also studying

(subcultures)

universal

his study

tantly

a situation.

ones.

for changes

that

decreasing

nations

methods

one of them

Avoid-

versus

characteristics

forceful

vital

of accept-

Uncertainty

a less penetrating

obvious

four

(the degree

the importance

the most

individual,

He sought

stresses

Hof-

Individualism-Collectivism

inside

to have

most

cultures.

(assertiveness

stresses

is

level.

of power),

of avoidance),

impact

Culture

on every

study

Distance

distribution

only mar-

or a society.

of national The

about

of the immense

a group

all institutions

in 40 countries.

of unequal

come

is so because

throughout

differences ance

CARLSiiii

culture”.

(i.e. industrial

of the theories

of culture,

values

in this article, shared

values

and outside

the subculture

and

we define on industry.

industrial

is also formed

just

organi-

as a subculture impulses

of

go to soci-

ety as a whole. Following

Hofstede

can exhibit mon

values”.

viewed studying accept 186

values

as

Nevertheless, an

the that

( 1980)) we agree in the strictest

we think

amalgamation formation

individuals,

sense

and small

that

only culture

each

culture

of dissimilarities. change groups

individuals

-

of cultures, and

is “commust So,

be

when

we must

subcultures

do

ADVERTISING

have

the capacity

priori

find

it necessary

rent groups

that

represent these

to achieve

sionals

For

One

way

changes

in industrial

Drawing

on

culture.

time,

from

industrial

as is culture imposed

1980) but we arc not interested

in

studies

culture

in space.

stede,

changes,

interested

seen there.

cross-cultural

that

of the difficulties in cultural

industrial

is to investigate

We are especially

aware trends

propose profcs-

between

culture

and the changes

we argue

over

we

consumers,

interplay

industrial

knowledge

countries,

changeable

the

and

the role of the media, tween

they may

bodies.

of studying

advertising

the diffe-

since

culture,

media,

we a

clearly

culture,

industrial

to be entrepreneurs,

Therefore,

very

the industrial

and legislative

print

change.

to distinguish

form

subcultures.

parts

overall

AND CULTURE

by such

bc-

might

be

We are quite

an approach

(Hof-

in the very long-term

rather

the

more

short-term

variations. As may be clear, culture

we do not assume

to be culture

often

discussed

advertising

forming

in

could

industrial

culture.

industrial

culture

trial advertising

this be

seen

could

part of the

per se. The role of the media

context.

From

any specific For

instance,

as a molder

these

be measured,

in industrial

and/or

standpoints,

mirror

of

we discuss

and

is

industrial how

the role of indus-

culture.

Changes in Industrial Culture As mentioned, -

the “collectively

i.e. industrial

and

culture

institutions

consumers, media.

In

advertising media. find,

even

studies prove

if we hold

to be of great

ambitious and

to look particularly

of industrial

it likely that

shared

-

are

organizations policies, economy products.

field -

that

in

may be hard

to

used in

1980) may well

by actors industry’

instance

most

outside

to concentrate

indicated strategies,

and

the

evident

like). -

over

inside -

time.

industry

collectively

by the

goals

trade

organization

Values

according

preference

industry

on a less

of comparison

within

in the consumer’s Values

print

shown

techniques

(Morgan,

be held

Values

policies are

culture,

normal

we prefer

(business

unions

industrial

for

at the role of

value.

may

of it.

entrepreneurs,

industrial

culture

cultures

namely

on industry

outside

study

of industrial

however,

method,

we

by people

bodies.

study

pilot

on industry” held

as media,

the

of organizational

Values

kinds

and

we choose

indicators

In this study,

values

and legislative

as an indicator

Other

shared

are formed

of various

professionals

In this study the

-

outside

by the

to classical

for certain

are also shown

set

types

of

in regula187

HOLMQUIST

& JhRGEKSEN

tions and laws, applying

CARLSiiii

to the industry.

values have a material

indicator.

and outside

industry

on “service”

tween buyer

and seller on the industrial

focus on changes industrial

in material

As is seen, most

For instance affect

conditions

the values in-

the relation market.

be-

We now

that have impact on

culture.

Drawing

from

administration, to be among

experience

during

within

the most important

strom & Adahl,

the

the seventies,

field

of business

we find the following

changes

in Sweden

(Berg-

1981).

- concentration of industry _ more business travel _ changes in the negotiation

position of buyers

_ industrial democracy _ emancipation by women _ amalgamation

of professional

-

computerization

-

lower investments

-

effectiveness

in long-term

assets

instead of efficiency

the role of industry

has changed

society, also in non-economic These

and private roles

trends,

of course,

to become

a vital part of

issues.

are only part of the total change,

but for this pilot study we used them as a starting each of the trends

mentioned

point. For

above the media might func-

tion as mirror or as molder. There

are other changes

ture, in a more indirect tions.

Changes

culture

that might affect industrial

way than we see in material

in the overall

culture,

of which

as a part, is vital. As industrial

culture

industrial

is a subcul-

ture of society as a whole we may well use Hofstedes four “speculative

cul-

condi-

(1980)

trends”:

_ collectivism - longer power distance - increasing uncertanty avoidance _ increasing masculinity. Another

source for changes

in overall culture,

to us, is trends in organization be a mirror, state

the

theory.

by itself it is a molder.

following

trends

Though

quite natural theory may

Berg and Daudi

in contemporary

(1982)

organization

theory: concerning

the character

of organizational

- from single and simple to multiple - from behaviour

images:

and complex

to action

- from instrumentalism to symbolism - from a mechanistic logic to a social rationality 188

images

ADVERTISING concerning

the character

or research

- from single level to multilevel - from narrowband

AND CULTURE

methodology:

analysis

to wideband

research

methods

- from fact finding to meaning

constructions.

Though

of changes

there is more evidence

theory

(Morgan,

point

to a study

1980;

Cummings,

of journal

in organizational

1982)

articles,

we just

want to

as this resembles

the

method used by us. Daft (1980)

analyzed

zational

He used two scales to clas-

analysis

over 20 years.

sify the articles. continued

He found a trend -

work

accompanied

towards

material

on changes

statistical

organizational

in industrial

of

language

models.

culture,

we see the

trends as well as the trends in overall culture and in

theory as indicators as Hofstede terms,

from 1969 to 1979 -

low variety

by more complex

To summarize

articles on organi-

of cultural

(1980)

the operationalization

lives. So we consider hardly

ever

be

giving

Changes

in culture,

in quite broad

examples

in our daily

culture as such to be something

measured

studies and in studies we measure

changes.

shows, are best described

culture.

per

drawing

se.

Only

that can

in comparative

on lower level analysis

may

In this sense we are trying in this pre-

liminary

study to understand

studying

indicators

the phenomenon

of that culture:

of culture by

advertising

and indus-

trial trends. However, tioned.

we find it useful to summarize

If we consider

in overall culture

the development

changes

mentioned

can be summarized.

look two themes

pattern

and interdependence.

of tota@

ture of professional

and private

we see a

For example

the mix-

instead

is

of efficiency.

the

more inclusive, each

trend

to

Effectiveness

values on goal fullilment

If people

this has an effect on industrial

consider

is the wider

culture.

effectiveness term,

will show signs of consideration

or total, evaluations

of the trends

that we can no

roles of people.

at work -

the values they hold and thus influences example

but if

seem evident:

roles means

look at the working

their total lives -

Another

and

The material

may at first glance seem disparate,

we take a closer

consider

conditions

as in theory to try to find some underlying

themes,

longer just

the trends men-

the trends in material

presented

of economic

we could

argue

thus to

issues. For in the same

way, i.e. that the themes of totality and interdependence

are

underlying. Totality

and interdependence,

to see as such.

We

however,

accordingly

effects of this kind of values,

choose

are not very easy to point

to some

on a somewhat

more opera-

tional level. As we in the pilot study primarily

focus on the

relation

between

buyer and seller and the way products

are 189

HOLMQUIS’I’ valued,

we find

dependence -

& JiiRGENSEN

CARLSijij

the following

aspects

from parts

to whole

to interactive

- from efficiency

to effectiveness.

these

industrial tions,

and

inter-

systems

- from one-sided

Using

of totality

to be of interest:

trends

as a summarized

culture,

as indicated

we now move

indicator

before:

list of the changes

by material

to take a closer

of industrial

mentioned

relations

culture,

industrial

and other

look at another

namely

print

that

in

condipossible

part

of media

advertising.

Changes in Industrial Advertising As we have social

shown

change

earlier,

the status

of media

the

common

most

media

is not

culture.

The

der tives,

holds

the

a third

idea

to mirror

another

idea

is that

media

it necessary

that

stated

the media

is the mol-

The

Advertisements

view

these

that

in different

is in a true

the

through most

perspec-

media

might

situations.

sense

underlying

Still

autonomous.

patterns

of cor-

of these.

earlier,

trends.

the

to analyze

and the causes

As was

Perhaps

is formed

between

poses

molder

cultural

but

interdependence

from

relations

and

i.e. culture created by media. Of course,

change We think

of social values.

of culture

idea

media

as to how to describe

of media as mirror, i.e.

is that

former

opposing

see and

idea

on mass

alternatives

in the formation

the

of culture,

theories

the literature

gives several

industrial

same

reflect

goes

and/or

trends

arc indicators

for industrial

create

of

advertising.

industrial

culture,

we

propose. Industrial may

advertising

bc measured

is in the other

form

according tween see

may

as indicator and/or

apply.

to the same

of industrial

quantitatively.

part

As print

pictures, We

of industrial

used

to select

variables

culture

trends.

buyer

and the way products

and seller

changes

in

these

This

respects

we

culture

advertising

techniques

choose

we summarized

aspects -

of text

contexts

when

quite

part

as we chose

is the relation arc valued.

consider

in

the

beTo

following

of advertisements:

layout

- person

variables

- interactions -

environment

The layout, the

seller

ables, 190

for

for instance wants instance

type of illustrations,

to picture

the

occupations

product. shown,

is a sign of how The reflect

person values

varion

ADVERTISING

product

USC. Interaction,

shows

part

ment,

for instance

products

between

background,

and relations

interested where

as person

of relations

reader

follow

interaction,

and

shows

in what

seller.

Environperspective

are only examples,

up by studying

classifications

CULTURE

product

buyer

are set. These

could

the different

-

AND

the

the appendix

are shown.

Relations between Industrial Culture and Industrial Advertising Now and

we have social

changes

presented

change

and

conditions

and

of culture.

in other

how

So we have possible

to

and

changes

in values

seen

it is not

correlation.

over

indicators?

our

to find

such a connection. systematic

we present

ideas

future

-

on how such

move

we will

themes, shown

to find

summarizing

The method tisements

of such

a

to see if there

is

the relevance

of this field. Though could

be designed

we

in full.

of the pilot

study.

is any

sign

culture,

in

In this

of the the

three

changes

A4ethod

a Swedish

advertising, market.

As discussed, on four types

we decided

between

background).

The

themes

selected

number

buyer

variables

Among a

to enable

the

Swedish

periodical

towards

the

advertisements

of persons, between

and

changes

on advertising,

of adver-

representing

oriented

to analyze

variables

of the

analysis

magazine,

Lay-out (e.g. illustration,

of variables;

Znteruction (e.g. relations

relations

is a content

business i.e. advertising

Person variables (e.g.

chose

direction want

study

to

be remembered

to investigate

if there

used in this study in

industrial

studies

Is it

in industrial

the phenomenon

industrial

industrial

rent

we

in our study.

The Pilot Study -

age),

the

a study

to a description

try

question:

a period

we just

do not here aim to understand We now

section advertising

in any way correlated

out

study

-

last

It must

We also want

of a more

In the

in industrial

changes

by other aim

discussed

as seen in material

to a specific

changes

In this pilot

also

media

orientations.

down

are these

of mass

We have culture,

changes

narrowed

XC any

advertising

theory

indicators.

to measure

to get hold of changes

study

the

in the field of industrial

discussed

that

briefly

culture

seller)

were

and

sex,

product,

Environment (e.g.

and

chosen

to match

the diffe-

in industrial

culture.

We also

some

sort

and social

business called

colour),

occupation,

person

the

of comparison change

magazines

“Veckans

available,

Affarer”

with

in general. we

(Business 191

HOLMQUIST

Weekly).

& JiiRGENSEN

According

particular reaches

to statistics

periodical

ness magazines

on the periodical

has the largest

in Sweden.

45,000

particular

CARLSiiii

readers.

periodical

circulation

It is a weekly

Another

reason

is that the editorial

magazine

and

for choosing

this

policy and leader-

ship have been relatively

consistent

in this study. The readers

are mostly managers,

and

marketing

managers

press this of all busi-

over the years covered

within

industry

economists

and

the

retail

business. To enable

comparison

over time we generated

the study from two different

periods.

One

data for

period

was the

second half of 1969 and the other period was the second half of 1979.

The

different

industrial

two periods

line on industrial

were selected

climates culture.

according

to represent

two

to our previous

out-

It is evidently

of a decade,

retrospective

thinking

consequently

1969 etc are quite common

so that at the turn

is more common,

and

years for compari-

sons. We started

by going through

divided the advertisements

all advertisements,

_ office equipment _ industrial products - travel companies, hotels, conference -

company

then we

into the following groups:

facilities

services

- press, media, communication _ institutional advertising The number

of ads during the second half of 1969 was 512.

The number

of ads during the second half of 1979 was 502.

The two periods showed different

distributions

order to ensure a just comparison we included

all full-page

each period

for the years

study full-page

1969 and

ads as these contain

and the like, than do smaller analysis.

From

sample

each group

concern

the advertisement

of text and illustration analysis.

All variables

as present

refer to concrete few variables

a

adver-

The variables

in its entirety.

Most

to a greater we carried

for the

and thus are

of the variables

of the advertisement

of coding,

The com-

is thus the object

or not present.

features

ensure control

mentioned.

are dichotomous

need interpretation

analysis ourselves. 192

content

we selected

we used a coding sheet con-

mainly

further

text,

from 1969 and 76 from 1979.

the four types of variables

classified

to

more illustration,

a total of 95 full-page

taining

content

in

1979. We preferred

ads, which facilitates

To guide the data-collection,

bination

the two periods, in the analysis

of advertisement

of 30 %. We analysed

tisements

between

advertisements

of ad size. In

and only a degree.

To

out the content

ADVERTISING

The Pilot StudyFor a description is referred The

AND CULTURE

Results

of numerical

results

the interested

reader

to the appendix.

total

number

the second

of industrial

advertisements

found

half of 1969 (512) and in the second

(502) were distributed

among

different

categories

as follows: 1979

1969 Office

equipment

Industrial Travel

products companies,

hotels,

Press,

25% 17%

16%

20%

16%

15%

5%

8%

100%

100%

communication

Institutional

15%

31% 12%

services

media,

20% conference

facilities Company

in

half of 1979

advertising

Table 1: Categories of advertisements. The distribution

of different

ad sizes was as follows:

Half-page Full-page Double-page

1969

1979

17%

30%

63%

48%

20% ____ 100%

or more

22%

~

100%

Table 2: Ad sizes. The

result

of 30%

of the content

of each group

institutional

advertisements)

As noted

in Table

for office

equipment

A trend

in the

ments

for

list.

In the study

The

number

has

increased

decreased. tional

was

company that the

than

50%

of half-page

and

while

the

software

has decreased. in advertise-

and

hardware

institutional

advertising

was

on the top of the ranking type

has

been

double-page

amount

It can also be noted in

service

latter

there

(excluding of time.

found

of advertisements

of all industrial

that

the sample

of advertisement

direction

advertising

shows

is accentuated

number products

1979 period, to more

upon

industrial

indicates

by software

amounted The

1, the relative and etc,

This

is based

advertisements

for each period

opposite

travel

advertising. replaced

analysis

of full-page

of

ads.

a shift

in ad size.

advertisements full-page

that the shift to larger advertising,

especially

ads

has

ad size institu-

advertising. 193

HOLMQUIST

There

&JORGENSEN

has

amount

been

a change

of colour

towards

advertisements.

ous for software institutional

CARLSiiii

advertising

advertising,

a greater

This

such

trend

is most

as company

obvi-

services

and is accentuated

Lay-out

relative and

in double-page

ads. It is possible Illustrations

that colour used

is used to attract

as an attraction

1979 as in 1969. Illustrations the study

shows

of drawings.

illustration

According

to our

findings,

has changed

ads

illlustrated

have

never the

ads

seen

are present

mostly

young,

and

industrial change

that

become

more

When

mature

persons

arc used

mostly

become The

the

on some

Where The

change

to

industrial

more

in industrial

are

the

in only

the man

has

what

are their

were

rarely

have become however,

that in

or task-role

has

of occupation man

the product also

them

Neither

found was

were pres-

has become

that

between

between

also

product

and a person

showed

balance

was and

there

product person,

has and

nor

more been

a

man

in

product

is

found

for the

1979 period.

and

machine

has evolved

man

advertising.

way

of interacting

with

a lot. Informality

year

-

showed,

the link between study

a balance

changed

that

their occupation

in the illustrations

Instead,

was

and

occupations

between

advertising.

dominating

The

Male

kind

both

ent in illustration, obvious.

a man,

illustrations

The study

interaction

examined.

few women.

in 1969, they

obvious.

stress

when

very

in illustrations

men are present,

more

Women

advertising

ads.

in both of the periods.

ads where

of

true in 1979. A person

occupation

as a total.

Person Variables

amount

sharply.

show

in the study

Female

less common

ten

still

in many

in

in industrial

The

in industrial

in illustration

is still

was found

occupations?

aspects.

this still holds

advertising

and

in favour

an increase

has decreased

of all categories

women

has declined,

the role of man

frequently

When

in

ads.

in several

by persons been

attention.

less popular

has showed

ads as well as software

advertising

found

became

more

not as common

on the whole

pictures

Drawn

hardware

and

that

were

period.

The

the

prospective

buyer

has

has grown

remarkably

during

the

study

also

showed

seller-buyer

have

become

more

was most

often

referred

to in 1979, and the task of the buyer

was stressed. situation obvious

was

almost

never mutual

1969, when

presented.

This

has increased

a category

tasks

The study

A cooperative

from

advertising,

to stress

and buyer.

interaction 194

is a change

in software

a tendency seller

This

clear.

that

relations

somewhat

the buying

trend

which

in the interaction

indicates

relation

is most

also shows between

that problem-oriented while

product-oriented

Interaction

ADVERTISING

interaction This

AND

CULTURE

has decreased.

tendency

is accentuated

used in the ads. Technical arguments

by the kind of arguments

arguments

of application

show a decline,

while

more frequent.

This

have become

trend was most obvious in software advertisement. Economy, tions

good-will,

are other

monly

The change categories.

and international

that

used in industrial

prestige and esthethic Environment

novelty

arguments

have

advertising.

connec-

more

Arguments

com-

such

as

values have declined in importance.

is that environment

This

become

is less often used in most

trend is less obvious

in software

advertise-

ments.

Changes in Industrial Advertising Compared to Changes in Industrial Culture We have already

discussed

cators of industrial

theory. The argument seen as emanating changes.

the main

culture,

trends

was that different

indicators

from the same industrial

We identified

in other

indi-

such as trends in organizational could be

culture

three themes of particular

and its

interest

- from parts to whole systems - from one-sided

to interactive

- from efficiency

to effectiveness.

Relating

these aspects

to our four aspects

that the lay-out has changed ourful towards

lay-out

stresses

When towards decreased,

The

the whole

situation,

person variables

whole systems.

The

number

but when persons in a function.

whole idea-system

can

we

see

trend

is “sold”.

This

ideas, software

by drawings.

a trend

in ads has

they are distinc-

systems

parts of production.

or company whereas

well be represented has increased.

trends

and wider

of persons

are present, The

lower degree of ads picturing sons less obvious,

and

relation

can be noticed.

considering

placed

and col-

size of ads has changed

a new type of more interactive

aspects of efficiency

of ads, we find

to a more illustrative

type of advertisement.

too. The

tively

relations

implies

a

Instead,

a

makes per-

and the like may

The number

of drawings

We also notice that persons are more interac-

tive in their approach

to ads on the whole.

When it comes to interactions, we find that there is a stress on interactive

relations

to 1979. Perhaps tion has changed economic.

to become

Instead,

will and international When

growing

over the decade

the most important arguments

change

less technical of overall

from 1969

is that interacand specifically

application,

linkage are more common

good-

in 1979.

it comes to environment, we find that the trend from 195

HOLMQUIST

& JiiRGENSEN

CARLSiiii

specific settings was accompanied environment

by a less distinct

stress on

in the ads.

Discussion We have discussed trial culture

trial advertising positive

the relations

between

( in three broad themes) (in four variables).

correlation.

that changes

However,

in advertising of another

Our analysis

aspects

culture,

of industrial

be regarded correlation less

but

to claim in indus-

it is our purpose to point

explanation.

culture

on the indicator

If industrial

changes

in industrial

argues

relation

indicators

that

between

a higher

increasing

culture

degree

the increasing

amount

the same

before

changes

other

in industrial

society

by Hofstede

of collectivism, avoidance

related First,

may be

(1982), longer

who power

and increasing

in western society.

to the aspects

of industrial

collectivity

can be seen in

of institutional

type of ads, a collectivity power distances

from

of western

were signs of the seventies

culture seen in advertising?

avoidance

stem

are coming. advertising,

uncertainty

How are these trends

deliberately

in this study may

is changed

in the terms set forward

the number

of the

and could be seen as an early signal of

and the overall

masculinity

and

culture this may only mean that adver-

where and when changes

distance,

as mirror

advertising

put forward

advertising

tising is a forerunner,

analyzed

that

level may be high, but neverthe-

if both

source.

culture

suggest

as indicators of changes in the overall culture. The

meaningless

The

in induspoint to a

we do not intend

We do not here a priori look at advertising industrial

in indus-

is the cause of changes

trial culture or vice versa. Instead to the possibility

changes

and changes

advertising.

In this

is talking to the buyer. The longer

are not clearly seen, though the decrease

of persons

may indicate

is shown through formed

this. The

the stress of wholeness.

to sell whole systems,

ing the need for the buyer

thereby

to make decisions

Also, the stress on good-will and international give the impression

in

uncertainty Ads are decreas-

on his own. links serves to

of a whole system being sold.

Our idea of media as forerunner

means

that advertising

not per se a molder and not simply a mirror.

is

Instead,

adver-

tising could be the first sign of a coming main stream.

Media

people are most sensitive ing for changes.

Interaction

serve as an example. product-oriented

to trends and have a genuine

196

in practice

feel-

seller and buyer may

A market-oriented

view was observed

as early as in 1979 although exploited

between

view instead

in “Veckans

of a

Affarer”

this trend has not been fully

until quite recently.

If the role of the

ADVERTISING media,

especially

giving

the

rationalistic Our

is thus

(as material upon

we

advertising such

industry

it

and that

mirror

in

necessary

This

not

decline

phase.

It would

and

some

Firstly,

and industrial

values. There

is also

of society.

advertising

the

or an

for the media

in the initial

to be

a growing

to relate

a company stage,

autonomous

as a

in

awareness

our pilot

in

change in cultural of the

study

cultural

shows

over the last decade.

a change

We may argue

industrial advertising has a quite different function today

pared

to ten

another

years

decade.

advertising buyer

ago

For

indicates

that

has become

product

itself.

and

will

example,

still

or even

another

increase

the interaction

equally

Thirdly,

have

the

more

in our study

the

to be considered

is an obvious

Secondly,

cul-

per se. For industrial

tendencies

there

relate

culture

be possible

peak

distinguish

in industrial

then

to

to overall

parts

as a molder

studies.

field needs

only

we find it necessary

stage

should

culture

industrial

to function the

and

culture

to the life cycle of a product,

as a whole.

We can

advertising

culture.

industrial

as advertising,

(advertising)

that

as a less

attention.

are not homogeneous

role of media

factors

it means

as well

industrial

to overall

find

advertising

but also to stress

future

part,

of industrial

and empirical

Furthermore, industrial

that

changes)

as related

theoretical

media,

neutral

one.

be looked

ture,

is to be forerunner

a more

standpoint

indicators both

advertising,

media

AND CULTURE

comone

in

in institutional

between

seller

important

than

it seems

and

as if there

the

exists

a wide range of “subsubcultures ” within industrial culture. This clear

for the different

categories others

still

show

Taken

overall

one

levels

of the

difftcult an

than could

tendencies

may

in

parts

saw

type.

the that

parts

is first

seen

have

to do with

while

some

of the

On this midof the

of the subsubcultures. as a filter

all other

between

levels.

levels.

over-

Changes This

on

makes

it

“culture”. would an

The

like

to

increasing increase

“wholeness”

are sold.

argue

Some

1969,

the impact

at lower

affect

we

show

to consider

be pictured

to analyse We

of

of subcultures.

cultures/values

of this

increase

may

example

advertising.

in our analysis. pattern

as well as the impact

culture and

ments

three

on studies

level it is important

all culture

As

these

imposed

culture

used

general

tendencies.

together

Industrial

more

the

opposite

difficulties dle-range

categories

follow

is

of advertise-

be i.e.

a sign systems

of forerunner

shift

in advertisement. the fact that

institutional

number could

concept,

If the idea

a cultural

choose

is applied,

to wholeness This

it is easier

may

of an rather we

rather

than

to some

part

and faster

to change 197

HOLMQUIST the image

&JiiRGENSEN

as shown

organization tisement

to show

not

changes

signals,

In this article

we have

The

field

this

analyse

article.

understand

society occur

198

in scope, research

Still,

total

role

is

although may

research gain

Practical

thorough

di-

should

levels

of cul-

may

of the

role

on where

for practical

cul-

if we are to fully in

our

is essential

an approach

knowledge

also specif-

the field of industrial

marketing

marketing

importance

this

on cultural

understanding

for instance

is of utmost

from

and

is important of

one,

different

the role of marketing

here. -

on

on the concepts

research

advertising

the

on marketing more

ideas industrial

is a new

between

indicators.

Understanding -

tentative culture, further

elaborate

Further

the interplay

ture and industrial

forward

of ineffective

limited

where

culture

to further

ture and cultural

research

Though

is a field

of industrial

in this

ically

in advertising

and possible.

it necessary

scussed

some between

advertising.

indicates

necessary

makes

in the

use advertis-

be a sign

proposed

the interplay

and industrial

our study both

coming

the

adver-

adaptation

we could

trends could

expect

to changes.

how to understand culture

to the holds

since

to change

we may

prior

in an organization

adaptation

than

Consequently

If this reasoning

ing as warning but

in advertisements

as such.

organizations.

CARLSiiii

issues such also

society.

not only to as well as as that gain

of marketing and when marketing.

put

from

a in

trends

ADVERTISING

AND CULTURE

References Bagozzi,

Kihlberg,

R.

1975

“Marketing

Journal

as exchange.”

ofMarketing,

39:

1964

32-39. Berg, P.O.,

and R. Daudi

Theo;ry. Lund:

Levi-Strauss,

S., and A. AdahI

holm: Berman,

and Society).

1971

Morgan,

R.

S. Power, Rule and Domination. Kegan

Cummings, 1982

Paul

Hills:

1983

Sage.

London:

Routledge

&

evolution

oforganization

analysis

1980

Science Quarterly, 25: 623-

atl zeta.Sewualitetens Sijdert%lje:

T., and W.C.

Sturtevant

Anthropological

Organization London:

(The

solving

in

Science Quar-

K. and G. AndrCn

Peterson,

of

Change).

Lund:

(Advertising

and

Studentlitteratur.

R..4.

“I .he

and Nation, Publ.

1979

production

American Behaviour

ofculture.”

Rosengren,

Washington:

1981

The Aston Programme

American

Hills:

leadership theories

and P. Daudi

apply

(eds),

studying

organizational

Differences

Beverly

IV.

in Work-

cultures.”

24: 570-58

Administra-

1.

K.E.

“Mass

media

T. Szecskii

(eds)

Ltd.

Values. Beverly

A.M.

“On

tive Science Quarters,

of Washington.

Cultures Consequences. International

“Motivation,

Pettigrew,

(eds)

MacMillan

Gower

History

G. Related

1982

Society

D., and CJ.

Hohtede, 1980

historia.

Axling.

Anthropology and Human Behauiour.

1981

and puzzle Administrative

Scientist, 19: 669-684.

V+zn

Hickson,

Stockholm:

Social Research. Beverly

Reklam och samhiill.rfriindring. Social

1976

Sexuality)

1962

metaphors theory.”

in AS(Z

M.

Gladwin,

Mind).

terly, 25: 605-622.

636. Foucault,

Strategiesfor

organization

Nowak,

Administratiue

1959-79.”

Savage

G.

198 1

“The

of

Saae.

“Paradigms,

Annual Reuiew of

behaviour.”

R.L.

1980

Morgan,

L.L.

Psychology, 33: 541-579. Daft,

Journal

G. (cd) Beyond Method:

1980

Ltd.

“Organizational

of marketing.”

C.

Det uilda tiinkandet. (The

Hills: Clegg, 1975

the concept 33: 10-15.

Bonnier.

M & B FackboksTdrlag.

Advertising and Social Change. Beverly

1981

Stock-

of Advertising).

P. and S. Levy. “Broadening Marketing,

Fijretaget i samhiillet.(Enterprise

1981

Bonn&s.

1969

Studentlitteratur. Bergstriim,

Ipegel. (In the Mirror

Stockholm: Kotler,

(eds)

Traditions and Trends in Organization

1982

L. I annwzwxaS

and social

(eds),

Hills:

change.”

in E. Katz

Mass Media andSocial

and

Change

Sage.

Shaw,

D.L, and M.E.

1980

Emergence ofAmerican

McCombs Political

Function ofthe Press. St Paul:

Issues: Agenda Setting West

Publishing

Co.

Sage.

and organization:

Do

abroad?”

Berg

In P.0.

Traditions and Trends in Organi-

zation Theory: II 201-11

222. Lund:

Studentlit-

teratur HBkansson, 1976

H. and I. Snehota

Marknadsplanering (Market lems?)

Jonsson, 1976

Lund:

1981

A Way to Create

New Prob-

Studentlitteratur.

R., and I. Jonsson Vadsiigerannoruen? ing of Ads?)

Katz,

Elt siitt alt skapa nya problem?

Planning-

Stockholm:

Stockholm:

E. and T. Szecskij,

(What

is the Mean-

Prisma.

(eds)

Mass Media and Social Change. Beverly

Hills:

Sage. I

199