Intragastric administration of glutamate increases REM sleep in rats

Intragastric administration of glutamate increases REM sleep in rats

PHB-10156; No of Pages 4 Physiology & Behavior xxx (2013) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physiology & Behavior journal homepage: ...

411KB Sizes 21 Downloads 118 Views

PHB-10156; No of Pages 4 Physiology & Behavior xxx (2013) xxx–xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Physiology & Behavior journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phb

3Q1

Karuna Datta, Deependra Kumar 1, Hruda Nanda Mallick ⁎

4

Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India

O

F

2

Intragastric administration of glutamate increases REM sleep in rats☆,☆☆

1

P

• Effect of intragastric glutamate administration on sleep was studied in rats. • Sleep–wake parameters were studied for 6 h after intragastric administration of glutamate or saline. • Intragastric glutamate administration showed significant increase in REM sleep without much effect on slow wave sleep.

i n f o

a b s t r a c t

Study objective: To study the effect of intragastric infusion of glutamate on sleep–wake (S–W) parameters in rats. Design: Longitudinal study design. Setting: N/A. Patients/Participants: 10 adult male Wistar rats. Interventions: 0.12 M, 1.5 ml intragastric monosodium glutamate and saline. Measurements and results: S–W parameters were recorded by chronic implantation of EEG, EOG and EMG electrodes under thiopentone sodium anesthesia. After post-op recovery, sleep was recorded by a digital recording system (BIOPAC system Inc. BSL PRO 36, USA). 1.5 ml of 0.12 M MSG or saline on two different days, three days apart, was delivered intragastrically by a gavage tube between 0945 and 1000 h and S–W parameters were recorded for 6 h after the intragastric administration (10:00–16:00 h). Data was analyzed as wake, slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep using standard criteria. Total sleep time (TST) was also calculated. S–W records were then divided into 2 h bins (10:00–12:00 h, 12:00–14:00 h and 14:00– 16:00 h). Total duration of wake, SWS and REM sleep in 2 h bins after glutamate administration was compared with the same 2 h bins after saline. Episode frequency and maximum episode duration for REM sleep, SWS and wake after glutamate administration were also compared with saline. Intragastric application of glutamate, as compared to saline significantly increased REM sleep duration in all the three 2 h bins, 10:00–12:00 h (p = 0.037), 12:00–14:00 h (p = 0.037) and 14:00–16:00 h (p = 0.007). Episode frequency of REM sleep was also significantly increased. Conclusion: Intragastric glutamate administration increases REM sleep duration. © 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.

T

E

Article history: Received 13 August 2013 Accepted 7 September 2013 Available online xxxx

D

a r t i c l e

Keywords: Glutamate REM sleep Intragastric Monosodium glutamate Rats

49

U

50

N C O

R

R

13 14 15 16 17 19 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

C

7 8 9 10 11 12

H I G H L I G H T S

E

6

R O

5

☆ Institution at which work was conducted: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029. ☆☆ Disclosure of financial support: The study is a part of an ongoing project which is supported by Ajinomoto Co. Inc. Tokyo, Japan. The financial support had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. ⁎ Corresponding author at: Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India. Tel.: +91 11 26594881; fax: +91 11 26588663. E-mail address: [email protected] (H.N. Mallick). 1 Present Address: Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstr, 2-10, 80804 Munich, Germany.

27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 48 47

1. Introduction

51

Monosodium L glutamate (MSG), a sodium salt of L glutamate, is a commonly used flavor enhancer in food. L glutamate is a multifunctional amino acid. It is involved in umami taste sensation [1], acts as a neurotransmitter in central [2] and enteric nervous system [3], and also causes diet induced thermogenesis [4]. Studies show that MSG, taken orally has several postingestive effects [5–7]. Intragastric administration of glutamate activates gastric branch of vagus nerve [8]. Distinct gut brain axis has been known to mediate the effects of intragastric glutamate administration [9]. Kitamura and co-workers [10] in 2011 suggested that glutamate signaling plays an important role in the process of digestion, absorption and metabolism via activation of distinct brain regions. Considering that

52

0031-9384/$ – see front matter © 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.007

Please cite this article as: Datta K, et al, Intragastric administration of glutamate increases REM sleep in rats, Physiol Behav (2013), http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.007

53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63

116

3. Results

117

The S–W parameters on Wistar rats (n = 10) following intragastric administration of MSG and saline are shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1(a), (b) and (c) is showing changes in duration (in minutes) of TST, SWS and REM sleep respectively during 10:00–12:00 h, 12:00–14:00 h and 14:00– 16:00 h after administration of MSG compared with saline. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was performed on the duration of each sleep wake parameter in the 2 h bins between intragastric administration of saline and glutamate.

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 Q3 111 Q4 112 113 114

118 119 120 121 122 123 124

C

88 89

E

86 87

R

84 85

R

82 83

O

80 81

Fig. 1. (a): Total sleep time duration in 2 h bins after intragastric administration of saline and glutamate. (b): Slow wave sleep duration in 2 h bins after intragastric administration of saline and glutamate. (c): REM sleep duration in 2 h bins after intragastric administration of saline and glutamate (★—p b 0.05).

C

78 79

N

76 77

U

74 75

F

115

Effect of intragastric administration of glutamate on S–W parameters was studied in ten adult male Wistar rats (BW, 225–275 g). They were housed individually in transparent polyethersulphone cage (floor, 445 × 295 × 185 mm and cage cover, 450 × 295 × 140 mm) with controlled temperature and ad libitum access to food and water (Millennium SPF Rack System R-series, Orient Co. Ltd., South Korea). The rats were maintained at 14 h lights (illumination above 200 lx) and 10 h dark (illumination below 5 lx) conditions with light on from 0600 h. Implantation of electrodes was conducted under thiopentone sodium (THIOSOL Sodium), anesthesia (40 mg/kg, body weight, i.p.). Electrodes for electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyogram (EMG) and electrooculogram (EOG) were chronically implanted and connected to an IC socket that was fixed to the skull with dental cement. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the rules of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee. Flexible cables with connectors were plugged to the rat's head. Output from the plug was connected to BIOPAC system Inc. (BSL PRO 36, USA) for digital recordings of EOG, EEG, and EMG. After a ten-day recovery period, the rats were trained for two days to move freely in the recording cage with the attached cable. The rats were also acclimatized to a gavage tube by inserting it once per day and injecting 1.5 ml of sterile water intragastrically everyday at 09:45–10:00 h for 4 days prior to the saline administration (recording day I) and MSG ( Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA ) administration (recording day II). On recording day I, each rat was administered 1.5 ml of saline and recording of S–W parameters for 6 h after intragastric administration of saline was done. After an interval of three days, the same rat was administered 1.5 ml of MSG and 6 h recording of S–W parameters after intragastric administration of MSG was done. 1.5 ml of saline (0.12 M) or MSG (0.12 M) was intragastrically delivered between 0945 and 1000 h. The S–W parameters were recorded during 10:00–16:00 h after intragastric administration of MSG/saline. The 6 h data of S–W parameters obtained from all the ten rats were split into 15 s epochs, and visually classified as wake, slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep using standard criteria [11]. Six hour S–W data after intragastric administration of saline and MSG were both divided into 2 h bins. Duration of SWS, REM sleep, wake and total sleep time (TST) was calculated every 2 h. Episode frequency and maximum episode duration were also calculated every 2 h. S–W parameters of 2 h bins, post intragastric administration i.e. 10:00–12:00 h, 12:00– 14:00 h and 14:00–16:00 h of saline were compared with the same 2 h bins of MSG. Statistical analysis was done using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test (IBM SPSS version 20).

72 73

O

71

R O

2. Methods

P

70

66 67

T

68 69

distinct forebrain regions are activated following intragastric glutamate administration, we hypothesized that there may be effect of glutamate on sleep–wake (S–W) parameters. To test the above hypothesis, we studied the effect of intragastric glutamate administration on S–W parameters in rats. To rule out umami taste related changes, we studied this effect following intragastric administration of glutamate in rats.

D

64 65

K. Datta et al. / Physiology & Behavior xxx (2013) xxx–xxx

E

2

Episode frequency of SWS, REM sleep and wake in rats was noted. Mean ± SD of duration and episode frequency of the S–W parameters of ten rats are shown in Table 1. Maximum episode duration of SWS, REM sleep and wake was also calculated in the 2 h bins. There was no statistically significant difference in maximum episode duration of these S–W parameters after intragastric administration of saline or glutamate.

125 126

4. Discussion

132

In the present study, we found a significant increase in REM sleep duration and its episode frequency following intragastric application of MSG as compared to saline. Though there was a decrease in SWS duration following intragastric glutamate as compared to saline, but it was not found to be significant. No significant change was found in TST and wake duration. This effect on sleep could not be attributed to umami taste sensation per se, as MSG was administered intragastrically.

133 134

Please cite this article as: Datta K, et al, Intragastric administration of glutamate increases REM sleep in rats, Physiol Behav (2013), http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.007

127 128 129 130 131

135 136 137 138 139

K. Datta et al. / Physiology & Behavior xxx (2013) xxx–xxx t1:1 t1:2

3

Table 1 Duration and episode frequency in 2 h bins of various sleep–wake parameters after intragastric administration of saline and glutamate.

t1:3

Sleep–wake parameter

Time of the day (2 h bins)

Intragastric administration — substance used

Total duration in minutes Mean ± SD

Total duration in minutes (p values)

Episode frequency⁎ Mean ± SD

Episode frequency⁎ p values

t1:4 t1:5 Q2 t1:6 t1:7 t1:8 t1:9 t1:10 t1:11 t1:12 t1:13 t1:14 t1:15 t1:16 t1:17 t1:18 t1:19 t1:20 t1:21

SWS

10:00–12:00 h

Wake

10:00–12:00 h

SWS

12:00–14:00 h

REM sleep

12:00–14:00 h

Wake

12:00–14:00 h

SWS

14:00–16:00 h

29.8 32.3 14.9 21.8 17.6 14.2 34.2 34.9 23.5 18.3 17.1 13.4 39.5 42.1 19.7 29.4 21.3 14.8

p = 0.373

10:00–12:00 h

86.4 79.7 14.4 19.63 19.2 20.68 88.43 84.73 16.75 21.35 14.83 13.93 85.45 78.38 18.55 26.95 16 14.68

p = 0.059

REM sleep

Saline Glutamate Saline Glutamate Saline Glutamate Saline Glutamate Saline Glutamate Saline Glutamate Saline Glutamate Saline Glutamate Saline Glutamate

151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181

p = 0.037⁎⁎ p = 0.919 p = 0.059 p = 0.037⁎⁎

R O

p = 0.799

O

p = 0.059 p = 0.007⁎⁎

8.83 5.42 5.55 6.16 5.70 6.27 10.64 9.34 10.84 6.04 4.25 5.76 13.02 6.47 7.36 8.00 12.00 5.96

F

p = 0.386

± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±

p = 0.015⁎⁎ p = 0.239 p = 0.759 p = 0.109 p = 0.123 p = 0.333 p = 0.032⁎⁎ p = 0.083

P

182

Acknowledgments

217

D

studied by Ootsuka et al., BAT thermogenesis also occurs as a part of ultradian cycle. BAT thermogenesis heats up brain and body and during sleep phase increased brain temperature increases REM sleep [24]. Apart from BAT thermogenesis, leptin, white adipose tissue hormone is also found to affect sleep. In a study conducted on normal fed rats, leptin significantly reduced REM sleep by 30% and increased SWS duration by 13% [25]. A study conducted in rats, using chronic L glutamate ingestion ad libitum, produced reduced leptin levels [26]. With chronic glutamate ingestion, though, plasma levels of leptin were reduced but there was no difference in food intake. Same study also showed that intake of glutamate produced reduced weight gain and fat deposition. This may be due to increased thermogenesis or some other energy dissipating mechanism, is not clear. Leptin is also found to mediate BAT thermogenesis [27]. With glutamate administration leptin levels are reduced [26] and induction of BAT thermogenesis has been documented [4]. BAT thermogenesis can increase REM sleep [24] and leptin significantly reduces REM sleep, highlighting the possible link between BAT thermogenesis, leptin and REM sleep following intragastric glutamate administration. In our study we did not measure BAT thermogenesis and its correlation to increased REM sleep in the two groups. Increased BAT thermogenesis is found to be associated during food intake [28]. We also were unable to correlate the food intake to sleep wake parameters. In our study there was an increase in episode frequency but the episode maintenance was not significantly affected implying an effect on REM sleep generation mechanisms with MSG. The long lasting effect of glutamate administration on REM sleep can be explained in terms of synaptic plasticity. Vagus nerve stimulation in rats has shown to produce LTP in hippocampus [29]. It could be possible that intragastric administration of glutamate may produce stimulation of vagus nerve resulting in LTP in forebrain areas. The prolonged effect on REM sleep following glutamate administration, may be either due to direct activation of sleep promoting areas or a complex interplay of REM generating areas of brain and thermogenesis mechanisms.

E

T

149 150

C

147 148

Ingestion of various food products is known to affect sleep. These effects may be either affecting sleep by changes in metabolism, changes in the plasma concentrations of melatonin [12] or CSF concentrations of serotonin [13] or tryptophan [14]. It can also affect either humorally or neurally by gut brain axis [15]. Many compounds, drugs and extracts affect a combination of these mechanisms to affect sleep. Hansen et al. reported that intact vagus was required for the effects of cafeteria diet, which is a high carbohydrate and high fat diet, on sleep. This diet as compared to normal chow caused increased SWS [16] and also produced diet induced thermogenesis [17]. This effect on sleep was found to be blocked by sub-diaphragmatic vagotomy in rats [16]. Vagal afferent stimulation is known to play an important role in induction of sleep [18]. MSG, unlike high carbohydrate and fat diet did not significantly affect total sleep duration or SWS duration, rather showed effects on REM sleep duration. Intragastric MSG is found to activate afferent vagal nerves [5,19,20] and a distinct gut-brain axis exists for glutamate signaling [9,19]. It is reported that abdominal vagotomy abolishes this response [21]. In our study, the effect of vagotomy on the sleep response has not been studied as vagotomy was not performed. Tsurugizawa et al. [7] in 2008, using fMRI studies showed that 60 mM intragastric administration of MSG caused activation of habenular nucleus, amygdala, medial preoptic area (mPOA) and DMH and the effect on these areas was not due to sodium ion in MSG but because of glutamate. Following intragastric administration of MSG, there was c-fos inductions in mPOA, lateral hypothalamic areas, DMH and arcuate nucleus [22]. Kondoh et al. [23] studied fMRI changes following intragastric administration of MSG and the activation of brain areas following MSG developed rapidly during infusion and reduced rapidly after cessation of infusion. Though the activation of brain areas following intragastric glutamate in the study done by Kondoh et al. [23] and by Tsurugizawa et al. [21] lasted only till the time the infusion occurred and did not have long lasting effects, we found increase in REM sleep for 6 h after administration of intragastric glutamate. The sustained increase in REM sleep may be due to activation of sleep promoting areas, the effect of which lasted even after cessation of infusion. Prolonged increase of REM sleep after intragastric glutamate may be probably as a result of long term potentiation (LTP) mechanisms in the neuronal circuitry inducing REM sleep. REM sleep increase may be linked to thermogenesis as 120 mM MSG used in the present study has been reported by Smriga et al. to cause diet induced BAT thermogenesis [4]. During active-wake states, as

E

145 146

4.90 12.22 3.91 5.09 6.46 12.65 6.25 8.51 5.63 5.62 4.67 6.65 12.35 7.09 4.74 7.03 10.72 6.70

⁎ Episode frequency is the number of occurrences of episodes in two hours; p values are derived using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test (**p b 0.05 considered as significant).

R

143 144

14:00–16:00 h

R

141 142

Wake

N C O

140

14:00–16:00 h

U

t1:22

REM sleep

± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±

183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216

The authors thank Mr. Ashish Datt Upadhyay, Department of Biosta- 218 tistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi for the help pro- 219 vided in data analysis. 220

Please cite this article as: Datta K, et al, Intragastric administration of glutamate increases REM sleep in rats, Physiol Behav (2013), http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.007

K. Datta et al. / Physiology & Behavior xxx (2013) xxx–xxx

[1] Lindemann B. A taste for umami. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:99–100. [2] Meldrum BS. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology. J Nutr 2000;130:1007S–15S. [3] Liu MT, Rothstein JD, Gershon MD, Kirchgessner AL. Glutamatergic enteric neurons. J Neurosci 1997;17:4764–84. [4] Smriga M, Murakami H, Mori M, Torii K. Use of thermal photography to explore the age dependent effect of monosodium glutamate, NaCl and glucose on brown adipose tissue thermogenesis. Physiol Behav 2000;71:403–7. [5] Uematsu A, Tsurugizawa T, Kondoh T, Torii K. Conditioned flavor preference learning by intragastric administration of L-glutamate in rats. Neurosci Lett 2009;451:190–3. [6] Yeomans MR, Gould NJ, Mobini S, Prescott J. Acquired flavor acceptance and intake facilitated by monosodium glutamate in humans. Physiol Behav 2008;93:958–66. [7] Tsurugizawa T, Kondoh T, Torii K. Forebrain activation induced by postoral nutritive substances in rats. Neuroreport 2008;19:1111–5. [8] Uneyama H, Niijima A, San Gabriel A, Torii K. Luminal amino acid sensing in the rat gastric mucosa. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006;291:G1163–70. [9] Kondoh T, Torii K. Brain activation by umami substances via gustatory and visceral signaling pathways, and physiological significance. Biol Pharm Bull 2008;31:1827–32. [10] Kitamura A, Tsurugizawa T, Torii K. Biological significance of glutamate signaling during digestion of food through the gut-brain axis. Digestion 2011;83:37–43. [11] Vetrivelan R, Mallick HN, Kumar VM. Tonic activity of alpha1 adrenergic receptors of the medial preoptic area contributes towards increased sleep in rats. Neuroscience 2006;139:1141–51. [12] Peuhkuri K, Sihvola N, Korpela R. Dietary factors and fluctuating levels of melatonin. Food Nutr Res 2012;56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v56i0.17252 [10.3402%2Ffnr.v56i0.17252#pmc_ext, last accessed on 12 Jun 2013]. [13] Peuhkuri K, Sihvola N, Korpela R. Diet promotes sleep duration and quality. Nutr Res 2012;32:309–19. [14] Xu CL, Sim MK. Effect of oral feeding of essence of chicken on the level of 5hydroxyindole acetic acid in the cerebrospinal fluid of the rat. Int J Food Sci Nutr 1997;48:113–7.

F

222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253

[15] Akanmu MA, Ukponmwan OE, Katayama Y, Honda K. Neuropeptide-Y Y2-receptor agonist, PYY3-36 promotes non-rapid eye movement sleep in rat. Neurosci Res 2006;54:165–70. [16] Hansen MK, Kapás L, Fang J, Krueger JM. Cafeteria diet-induced sleep is blocked by subdiaphragmatic vagotomy in rats. Am J Physiol 1998;274:R168–74. [17] Ma SW, Foster DO. Brown adipose tissue, liver, and diet-induced thermogenesis in cafeteria diet-fed rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1989;67:376–81. [18] Golanov EV, Reis DJ. Neurons of nucleus of the solitary tract synchronize the EEG and elevate cerebral blood flow via a novel medullary area. Brain Res 2001;892:1–12. [19] Uematsu A, Tsurugizawa T, Uneyama H, Torii K. Brain-gut communication via vagus nerve modulates conditioned flavour preference. Eur J Neurosci 2010;31:1136–43. [20] Niijima A. Reflex effects of oral, gastrointestinal and hepatoportal glutamate sensors on vagal nerve activity. J Nutr 2000;130:971S–3S. [21] Tsurugizawa T, Uematsu A, Nakamura E, Hasumura M, Hirota M, Kondoh T, et al. Mechanisms of neural response to gastrointestinal nutritive stimuli: the gut-brain axis. Gastroenterology 2009;137:262–73. [22] Otsubo H, Kondoh T, Shibata M, Torii K, Ueta Y. Induction of Fos expression in the rat forebrain after intragastric administration of monosodium L-glutamate, glucose and NaCl. Neuroscience 2011;196:97–103. [23] Kondoh T, Tsurugizawa T, Torii K. Brain functional changes in rats administered with monosodium L-glutamate in the stomach. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1170:77–81. [24] Ootsuka Y, de Menezes RC, Alimoradian A, Zaretsky DV, Hunt J, Stefanidis A, et al. Brown adipose tissue thermogenesis heats brain and body as part of the braincoordinated ultradian basic rest-activity cycle. Neuroscience 2009;164:849–61. [25] Sinton CM, Fitch TE, Gershenfeld HK. The effects of leptin on REM sleep and slow wave delta in rats are reversed by food deprivation. J Sleep Res 1999;8:197–203. [26] Kondoh T, Torii K. MSG intake suppresses weight gain, fat deposition, and plasma leptin levels in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Physiol Behav 2008;95:135–44. [27] Kondoh T, Torii K. MSG intake suppresses weight gain, fat deposition, and plasma leptin levels in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Physiol Behav 2008;95:135–44. [28] Kondoh T, Torii K. MSG intake suppresses weight gain, fat deposition, and plasma leptin levels in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Physiol Behav 2008;95:135–44. [29] Kondoh T, Torii K. MSG intake suppresses weight gain, fat deposition, and plasma leptin levels in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Physiol Behav 2008;95:135–44.

O

References

R O

221 Q5

P

4

U

N

C

O

R

R

E

C

T

E

D

289

Please cite this article as: Datta K, et al, Intragastric administration of glutamate increases REM sleep in rats, Physiol Behav (2013), http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.007

254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288