Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance for Banding of an Arteriovenous Fistula Causing High Cardiac Output Heart Failure

Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance for Banding of an Arteriovenous Fistula Causing High Cardiac Output Heart Failure

Journal Pre-proof Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance for Banding of an Arteriovenous Fistula Causing High Cardiac Output Heart Failure Anthony D. Turn...

9MB Sizes 0 Downloads 36 Views

Journal Pre-proof Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance for Banding of an Arteriovenous Fistula Causing High Cardiac Output Heart Failure Anthony D. Turner, MD, MBA, Michael Chen, MD, Neera Dahl, MD, Leslie Scoutt, MD, Alan Dardik, MD, PhD, Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar, MD, MS PII:

S0890-5096(19)31052-0

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.12.011

Reference:

AVSG 4821

To appear in:

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Received Date: 27 April 2019 Revised Date:

4 November 2019

Accepted Date: 6 December 2019

Please cite this article as: Turner AD, Chen M, Dahl N, Scoutt L, Dardik A, Ochoa Chaar CI, Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance for Banding of an Arteriovenous Fistula Causing High Cardiac Output Heart Failure, Annals of Vascular Surgery (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.avsg.2019.12.011. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

1

Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance for Banding of an Arteriovenous Fistula

2

Causing High Cardiac Output Heart Failure

3 4

Anthony D. Turner, MD, MBA1, Michael Chen, MD2, Neera Dahl, MD3, Leslie Scoutt,

5

MD4, Alan Dardik, MD, PhD1, Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar, MD, MS1

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery Yale School of Medicine 333 Cedar Street, Boardman 204 PO Box 208062 New Haven, CT 06520-8039 United States of America Telephone: 203-785-2561 Fax: 203-785-7556 Email: [email protected]

2

17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Department of Internal Medicine, section of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America 3 Department of Internal Medicine, section of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America 4 Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America

24

Corresponding Author: Anthony D. Turner, MD, MBA: [email protected]

25

Michael Chen, MD: [email protected]

26

Neera Dahl, MD: [email protected]

27

Leslie Scoutt, MD: [email protected]

28

Alan Dardik, MD, PhD: [email protected]

29

Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar, MD, MS: [email protected]

30

*All figures printed in color.

31

Turner et al., 2 32

Abstract

33

The creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred mode of access for

34

hemodialysis in patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). High output cardiac failure is a

35

known but rare complication of AVF resulting from high flow volume. This case report

36

describes the use of intraoperative ultrasound as a guide for banding of an AVF to decrease flow

37

volume in a patient with high cardiac output failure. The access was preserved and a gradual

38

decline of cardiac function before and recovery after banding is demonstrated over an 18-year

39

period.

40

Introduction

41

High output cardiac failure is a rare complication of high-flow arteriovenous fistula

42

(AVF). This is defined as symptoms of exertional dyspnea, orthopnea, and peripheral edema in

43

the presence of an elevated cardiac index (>3.0 L/min/m2)1. The rate of AVF banding or ligation

44

due to worsening congestive heart failure (CHF) was identified as 2.6% in a cohort of 204

45

patients (322 accesses), according to a study by Dixon et al2. The mean time between initial

46

fistula creation and discovery of high cardiac output failure was 30 ± 17 months (range, 6-53)3.

47

Guidelines for ranges of blood flow within a typical dialysis access are as follows: low (600

48

mL/min), normal (600-1500 mL/min), and high (>1500 mL/min) categories4. We present a case

49

in which intraoperative ultrasound of an AVF was utilized as a guide for banding with

50

subsequent confirmed reduction in flow rate. The patient was successfully treated and

51

experienced remarkable improvement in heart failure symptoms. The patient consented to

52

publication of this case report.

53

Case Presentation

Turner et al., 3 54

A 53-year-old obese (BMI =31.6 kg/m2) woman with past medical history of ESRD

55

secondary to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis on hemodialysis for 15 years, renal cell

56

carcinoma, atrial fibrillation, and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with biventricular failure

57

presented for evaluation of aneurysmal arteriovenous hemodialysis access. Her surgical history

58

was significant for a right brachiocephalic AVF creation in 2001 that provided uninterrupted

59

hemodialysis access without complication for 14 years. She complained of increasing dyspnea

60

on exertion (DOE) consistent with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III symptoms,

61

requiring two hospital admissions over a period of 2 years. Her EKG showed atrial fibrillation

62

with a heart rate of 90 beats per minute (bpm) and her echocardiogram demonstrated a reduced

63

ejection fraction (EF) of 35%. Figure 1 demonstrates the gradual decrease in EF over time from

64

60% in year 2000 (Figure I).

65

Left heart catherization demonstrated normal coronary arteries. Right heart catherization

66

revealed an elevated cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) at 11.2 L/min and 4.8 L/min/m2,

67

respectively. Systemic vascular resistance was remarkably low at 277 dynes/sec/cm-5 (normal:

68

700-1,500 dynes/sec/cm-5) which is consistent with high output heart failure. Chest radiograph

69

demonstrated cardiomegaly. On exam, the AVF had a small superficial eschar and 3 areas of

70

aneurysmal degeneration. A strong thrill was present without frank ulceration. Ultrasound of the

71

access showed no stenosis and a markedly elevated flow volume of 5 L/min proximal to the

72

anastomosis.

73

The surgical plan was to perform open revision of the largest aneurysm first with

74

imbrication or banding to decrease the flow and then tackle the 2 remaining aneurysms at a later

75

stage to avoid interruption in dialysis through the access necessitating placement of a dialysis

76

catheter. In late 2014, the patient underwent the first stage of surgery for open revision of her

Turner et al., 4 77

right brachiocephalic AVF with resection of the largest aneurysm and banding of the fistula.

78

After dissecting the aneurysm and heparinization, the AVF was controlled with vessel loops and

79

the aneurysm was opened and the excess wall was resected. Intraoperative ultrasound was used

80

to assess the flow rate (Figure II). Then, the remaining aneurysm wall was plicated with 5-0

81

running Prolene sutures over 16-French sheath to prevent stenosis and create a diameter of 5 mm

82

(Figure III). The flow rate as calculated by the intraoperative Doppler ultrasound decreased to 3

83

L/min but was still relatively high. Our goal was to achieve an access flow rate of 1 L/min. Next,

84

a 0.8 x 0.8cm bovine pericardial patch was used to band the revised portion of the AVF which

85

reduced the flow rate to 1.2 L/min (Figure IV). We divided a longitudinal short strip of the patch

86

and closed it on the vein with 3-0 prolene interrupted sutures. The patient had an uneventful

87

postoperative course and uninterrupted use of the AVF remained possible through the other non-

88

aneurysmal portions.

89

A month later, the remaining aneurysms were revised and that allowed her to avoid

90

placement of a dialysis catheter. The DOE improved with symptoms consistent with NYHA

91

Class II. The EF increased to 52% over 2 years, while left ventricular diastolic dimension

92

(LVDD) decreased from 5.7 cm to 4.8 cm. Repeat Doppler ultrasound at 2 years demonstrated a

93

fistula flow volume of 2.1 L/min, substantially decreased from the original 5 L/min on

94

presentation. No stenosis or other abnormalities were observed. Her cardiac index, measured

95

with non-invasive echocardiogram, increased from 1.9 L/min/m2 to 4 L/min/m2. This trend in

96

cardiac index was corrected after a decrease from 4.8 L/min/m2 in 2012. Ultimately, the patient

97

experienced an inverse relationship between her systemic vascular resistance and cardiac index

98

(Figure V). She remained stable for more than 2 years without hospital admissions for heart

99

failure and continues to use the access for dialysis.

Turner et al., 5 100

Discussion

101

This case report highlights the detrimental effects of high flow AVF on cardiac function

102

with successful reversal after banding and revision of the access over a period of 18 years. High

103

output cardiac failure caused by a high-flow AVF can manifest as systemic venous or pulmonary

104

congestion and a resting cardiac output greater than 8 L/min5. Clinical findings may include

105

prolonged bleeding, arm swelling, jugular venous distention (JVD), coarse lung crackles, S3

106

heart sound, and bilateral leg edema. When suspected, diagnostic evaluation often involves chest

107

radiograph, echocardiogram, and right heart catheterization6. Worsening cardiac function after

108

AVF creation can be a result of shunting of blood flow from the high resistance arterial system

109

into the low resistance venous system, with subsequent increase in venous return and CO.

110

Studies evaluating echocardiographic changes after AVF creation demonstrated an increase in

111

left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), contractility, stroke volume and CO within 7–10

112

days after surgery. On average, the creation of an AVF increases CO by 15–20% and left

113

ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 5–10%7. If untreated, cardiac decompensation will progress

114

resulting in a precipitous decrease in cardiac index with reciprocal elevation in systemic vascular

115

resistance.

116

Treatment of high-output heart failure secondary to excess arteriovenous shunting

117

involves flow reduction procedures including surgical banding or ligation1. Surveillance

118

measures such as duplex Doppler ultrasound is commonly used to measure blood flow before

119

and after surgery8. Our literature analysis has identified cases of intraoperative flow monitoring

120

for banding of high output AVFs using modified Swan Ganz catheters or ultrasound guided

121

banding of an AVF before and after the procedure. A suture tied externally over a 10-French

122

dilator for high-flow AVF banding was used by Letachowicz et al. with ultrasound performed

Turner et al., 6 123

before and after surgery. The authors performed surgical banding on 12 patients who all showed

124

cardiac hypertrophy on echocardiography but only four patients with signs of heart failure using

125

external dilator-assisted banding instead of endovascular catheterization. The study reported that

126

mean brachial blood flows were 3733.2 ± 826.2 mL/min preoperatively and

127

1461.2 ± 337.7 mL/min after surgery for a mean flow reduction of 2272.2 ± 726.9 mL/min9.

128

A study by Gkotsis et al. utilized intraoperative ultrasound for precision fistula banding

129

after a successful renal transplant. Even after kidney transplantation with suboptimal impaired

130

graft function most physicians prefer AVF blood flow reduction as a safer option rather than

131

fistula ligation10. However, surgical banding carries an 11% risk of thrombosis and a 2.8%

132

infection risk in the early postoperative period. The risks of AVF thrombosis is higher with

133

greater reduction of flow2. This served as our impetus for using intraoperative Doppler

134

ultrasound and closing over a 16-French sheath in order to mitigate the risk of extensive

135

narrowing and thrombosis of the access, as opposed to suture tying externally over a 10-French

136

dilator. Following the procedure, the patient experienced a marked decrease in systemic vascular

137

resistance from 1,558 dynes/sec/cm5 preoperatively to 590.9 dynes/sec/cm5 over 3 years.

138

Similarly, interval improvement in her previously diminished cardiac index increased from 1.9

139

L/min/m2 to 4L/min/m2 over 3 years.

140

The method of intraoperative ultrasound was utilized in our case report to accurately

141

band an AVF to a specific size. We did an open revision of an access and used a sheath to gauge

142

the caliber of the imbrication which decreased the flow compared to baseline. However, the AVF

143

still maintained high-flow rates which required subsequent banding. Intraoperative Doppler

144

ultrasound was a paramount resource to gauge our technique and ensure precise results.

145

Conclusion

Turner et al., 7 146

Arteriovenous fistulas are crucial for long-term hemodialysis in patients with ESRD.

147

Rarely, this is complicated by high output cardiac failure which is amenable to surgical banding.

148

Intraoperative duplex Doppler ultrasound is a useful adjunct to assess flow volume and guide

149

banding of hemodialysis access. Reduction of flow volume can lead to sustained recovery of

150

cardiac function.

151 152 153

References

154

Fistulas. Journal of Cardiology Cases. 2015 May; 11(5): 132-135.

155

[2] Dixon, B.S., Novak, L., Fangman, J. Hemodialysis Vascular Access Survival: Upper-Arm

156

Native Arteriovenous Fistula. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2002 January; 39(1): 92-

157

101.

158

[3] Chemla, E.S., Morsy, M., Anderson, L. et al, Inflow Reduction by Distalization of

159

Anastomosis Treats Efficiently High-Inflow High-Cardiac Output Vascular Access for

160

Hemodialysis. Seminars in Dialysis. 2007 January-February; 20(1): 68-72.

161

[4] Miller, G.A., Hwang, W.W. Challenges and Management of High-Flow Arteriovenous

162

Fistula. Seminars in Nephrology. 2012 November; 32(6): 545-550.

163

[5] Tordoir, J., Canaud, B., Haage, P. et al, Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines on Vascular

164

Access. Nephrology Dialysis Transplant. 2007 May; 22(2): ii88-ii117.

165

[6] Zamboli, P., Luca, S., Borrelli, S. et al, High-Flow Arteriovenous Fistula and Heart

166

Failure: Could the Indexation of Blood Flow Rate and Echocardiography Have a Role in

167

the Identification of Patients at Higher Risk? Journal of Nephrology. 2018 December; 31(6):

168

975-983.

[1] Imran, T.F., Hashim, H., Beidas, A.K. et al, A Covert Complication of Arteriovenous

Turner et al., 8 169

[7] Agarwal, A.K. Systemic Effects of Hemodialysis Access. Advances in Chronic Kidney

170

Disease. 2015 November; 22(6): 459-465.

171

[8] Quencer, K.B., Kidd, J., Kinney, T. Preprocedure Evaluation of a Dysfunctional Dialysis

172

Access. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2017 March; 20(1): 20-30.

173

[9] Letachowicz, K., Kusztal, M., Golebiowski, T. et al, External Dilator-Assisted Banding

174

for High-Flow Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula. Renal Failure. 2016 January; 38(7):

175

1067-1070.

176

[10] Gkotsis, G., Jennings, W.C., Malik, J. et al, Treatment of High Flow Arteriovenous

177

Fistulas after Successful Renal Transplant Using a Simple Precision Banding Technique.

178

Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2016 February; 31: 85-92019.