Accepted Manuscript Intraovarian spatial and vascular harmony between follicles and corpus luteum in monovulatory heifers, mares, and women O.J. Ginther PII:
S0093-691X(18)30859-8
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.01.019
Reference:
THE 14849
To appear in:
Theriogenology
Received Date: 25 September 2018 Revised Date:
18 January 2019
Accepted Date: 24 January 2019
Please cite this article as: Ginther OJ, Intraovarian spatial and vascular harmony between follicles and corpus luteum in monovulatory heifers, mares, and women, Theriogenology (2019), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.01.019. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 0 1
Revision to Theriogenology on Jan 18, 2019
2
Review
Revised
Intraovarian spatial and vascular harmony between follicles and corpus luteum in
4
monovulatory heifers, mares, and women
5
RI PT
3
O. J. Ginthera,b*
7
aEutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, Wisconsin, USA
8
b Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of
M AN U
9
SC
6
Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
10
*Correspondence: Tel.: +1 608 798 4026.
12
E-mail address:
[email protected] (O.J. Ginther)
EP
14
AC C
13
TE D
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 15
Abstract
16 Heifers have two or three major follicular waves per interovulatory interval (IOI). In
RI PT
17
mares and women, the ovulatory wave is the only major wave in most (75%) IOI. The beginning
19
of diameter deviation during follicle selection of the future dominant follicle (DF) is followed by
20
continued growth of DF and decreasing growth of the future subordinate follicles. Diameter
21
deviation in Bos taurus heifers, mares, and women begins when the future DF is a mean of 8.5,
22
22.5, and 10.5 mm, respectively. Selection of the ovulatory follicle occurs more frequently from
23
right ovary (RO) in heifers and women and from left ovary (LO) in nulliparous mares with no
24
difference between ovaries in parous mares. The RO predilection for ovulation is preceded by a
25
predilection for more follicles in RO before the beginning of deviation as indicated by (1) in
26
heifers and women, there were more predeviation follicles in RO than LO and ovulation
27
occurred more frequently from RO whereas in mares there was no difference between ovaries in
28
number of predeviation follicles and ovulation occurred with similar frequency between ovaries
29
and (2) in heifers, the number of ovulatory waves with DF in the ovary that had more
30
predeviation follicles was greater than the number of waves with DF in the ovary that had fewer
31
follicles. In heifers, ovulation from RO occurs more frequently when the regressed CL is also in
32
RO and is attributable to a positive intraovarian effect of the CL on predeviation follicles that
33
were adjacent to the CL. The positive two-way effect between CL and future DF when adjacent
34
is expressed by greater dimensions and vascular perfusion of CL and DF. This phenomenon
35
awaits study in mares and women. An exception to more frequent RO ovulation in heifers occurs
36
in wave 3 owing to a switch during predeviation in future dominance to a smaller follicle when
37
the largest follicle is adjacent to the regressing CL. A preovulatory contralateral relationship (DF
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2 and CL in opposite ovaries) during the last wave of an IOI in heifers usually (eg, 88%) converts
39
to an ipsilateral relationship during wave 1 of the next IOI in association with continuity in
40
vascular perfusion and number of predeviation follicles per ovary. Alternating relationships
41
between consecutive ovulations were not found in mares and is controversial in women. Applied
42
potential of ovarian asymmetry is indicated by greater blastocyst rate for RO oocytes in cattle
43
and greater pregnancy rate for RO ovulation in women.
SC
44
RI PT
38
Keywords: Dominant follicle; Follicle selection; Follicular waves; Monovulatory species; Side of
46
ovulation.
M AN U
45
47
AC C
EP
TE D
48
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3 49
1. Introduction
50 The abbreviations or acronyms that are used in text, tables, and figures of this review are
RI PT
51
listed (Table 1). Terminology is illustrated (Fig. 1) for follicle diameter deviation, switching in
53
follicle destiny during luteolysis in ovulatory wave 3 in heifers so that the smaller follicle
54
becomes the DF, DF-to-CL intraovarian patterns, and ipsilateral and contralateral relationships.
55
The DF becomes the PF in the last wave of an IOI. Nomenclature used for intraovarian patterns
56
and relationships between DF (or PF) and CL relationships are shown (Fig. 1, lower panel). A
57
slant bar is used to indicate both pattern and side (eg, PF−CL/RO).
M AN U
SC
52
The dynamics of follicular waves are considered and illustrated (Fig 1) before discussing
59
intraovarian spatial harmony between follicles and CL and the RO predilection for ovulation. In
60
heifers, mares, and women, a major follicular wave develops a DF, and each wave is generated
61
by an FSH surge [1]. Minor waves are also generated by FSH but by definition do not develop a
62
DF in heifers [2], mares [3], and women [4]. Minor waves will not be considered in this review.
63
Two or three major waves occur during the IOI in cattle [5]. Wave 1 (first wave of the IOI) and
64
wave 2 of three-wave IOI are anovulatory. Wave 2 in two-wave IOI and wave 3 in three-wave
65
IOI are ovulatory. Wave 1 in cattle begins about 3 days before ovulation as 1- to 2-mm antral
66
follicles during the end of the last wave of the previous IOI [6,7]. The follicles of waves 1, 2, and
67
3 attain 4 or 5 mm by Days 0, 10, and 16, respectively [8]. Horses and humans have only the
68
ovulatory major wave in 75% of IOI and the ovulatory wave and a preceding major anovulatory
69
wave in 25% [9]. Growth rate of the future DF in the three species continues and the growth rate
70
of subordinate follicles begins to wane in a process termed diameter deviation (Fig. 1) (reviewed
AC C
EP
TE D
58
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4 71
in [10]). Deviation is a manifestation of follicle selection and begins when F1 reaches about 8.5,
72
22.5, and 10.5 mm in heifers, mares, and women, respectively [11].
73
Previous reviews have considered (1) the longtime mystery of selection of a DF from the many follicles of a follicular wave in cattle [10], horses [12], women [13], and the three species
75
[14]; (2) an FSH-driven predeviation mechanism that spontaneously switches the apparent
76
destiny of future dominance from a larger to a smaller follicle during the luteal phase in
77
monovulatory species (cattle, horses, humans) [11]; and (3) functional asymmetries of the
78
reproductive tract in cows [15,16] and mares [17]. This review considers intraovarian
79
mechanisms that have been described primarily in cattle in the past 6 years including recent
80
findings on the association between number of predeviation follicles per ovary and RO vs LO
81
ovulation (Section 3), frequency of DF and CL in RO (Section 4), effect of a DF-to-CL
82
relationship (DF and CL in same vs opposite ovaries) in a wave on the relationship in the next
83
wave (Section 5), switching of follicle destiny in ovulatory wave 3 of three-wave IOI during
84
luteolysis (Section 6), and two-way positive coupling between an adjacent DF and CL during
85
predeviation in waves 1 and 2 (Section 7).
SC
M AN U
TE D
Despite a complex but harmonious intraovarian interplay between follicles and CL,
EP
86
RI PT
74
current management programs indicate that the ovaries are the most highly manipulated organs
88
in the body especially in cattle but includes to a lesser extent other farm species and humans.
89
These programs or techniques include (1) inducing luteolysis; (2) stimulating ovulation; (3)
90
presetting the day of ovulation in an individual and synchronizing ovulations among individuals;
91
(4) inducing multiple ovulations for embryo transfer purposes; and (5) collecting oocytes for
92
maturation, fertilization, and embryo transfer. These manipulative programs are practical and
93
efficient, but developers and operators should consider or at least appreciate the functional
AC C
87
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5 94
harmony among structures that has evolved within each member of this pair of relatively small
95
organs.
97 98
2. Functional ovarian asymmetries
99
Ovulation in cattle occurs more frequently from the RO than LO (eg, 60% vs 40%) [18].
SC
100
RI PT
96
The greater frequency of ovulation from RO was reported in cattle more than 100 years ago
102
(cited in [15]) but the underlying mechanism involved has received basic research consideration
103
only in the past several years. Although reports may be inconsistent, the RO is apparently more
104
active also in goats, hamsters, humans, mice, rats, and sheep (reviewed in [18]). The RO
105
predilection for ovulation in many mammalian species indicates that it is a fundamental
106
phenomenon. Subsequent sections consider the asymmetries in ovulation frequencies and in
107
number of follicles during the common growth phase (Section 3) and in types of intraovarian
108
patterns (Sections 4, 5). Differences in physiologic events between sides may be a direct
109
consequence of morphologic differences that were established during the fetal stage. In female
110
calves in the first few weeks of life, the RO compared to the LO had significantly greater fluid
111
volume for follicles 4 to 13 mm and greater weight [19]. This important finding has been almost
112
dormant since 1935. No reports were found on differences in follicle dynamics between LO and
113
RO for the bovine fetus or newborn calf. The RO predilection for ovulation is expressed at the
114
first ovulation of sexual maturity [20]. In humans, the right fetal gonad is more developed than
115
the left gonad as indicated by weight, protein content, and DNA content [21].
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
101
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6 116
Greater response of RO to superovulation treatment [22] and greater cleavage and blastocyst rates for RO oocytes have been reported in cattle [18]. Blastocysts formed from 42%
118
of 697 bovine oocytes from RO and 21% of 523 oocytes from LO. This finding needs further
119
study owing to potential applied as well as basic ramifications. Greater pregnancy rate from RO
120
ovulation has been reported in women [23] but side differences were not detected in cattle
121
[18,24]. Contrary to greater pregnancy rate from RO ovulation, an earlier report indicated that in
122
lactating Holstein cows (n = 104) pregnancy rate tended to be greater (P < 0.08) when ovulation
123
occurred from LO [25]. In a recent report in Holstein heifers (n > 1000 ovulations), pregnancy
124
rate at 60 days was significantly greater when the PF was in LO [26]. Also, pregnancy rate was
125
lower in heifers and cows when the DF-to-CL relationship of wave 1 was ipsilateral (DF−CL
126
pattern) than when contralateral [27]. Further study will be required to unravel the factors
127
involved in the greater pregnancy rate when PF is in LO and when the DF-to-CL relationship in
128
wave 1 is contralateral. Reportedly, more female embryos develop from in vitro fertilized
129
oocytes from LO than RO in cattle [28], and more female calves develop in the left horn and
130
more male calves in the right horn [28,29]. The role of ovaries, oviducts, and uterus in gender
131
differences between sides in cattle needs confirmation and further study. In cattle and rodents,
132
the side of origin of the oocyte may determine the greater frequency of male and female
133
offspring from RO and LO ovulations, respectively (reviewed in [18,28]).
135
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
134
RI PT
117
136
3. Relationship of number of predeviation follicles per ovary to ovulation
137
asymmetry
138
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 7 139
Heifers. A greater number of follicles develop in the RO of cattle during the IOI [30,31]. Studies in cattle [30,32] and sheep [33−35] prior to 2014 indicated that the CL had a positive
141
intraovarian relationship to the number of follicles per ovary. A subsequent factorial study in
142
heifers found that prior to deviation the RO and presence of the future DF but not the CL had a
143
positive local association with number of follicles that attained at least 5 and 6 mm even after the
144
future DF was excluded in the tally [36]. The local relationship between number of growing
145
follicles and CL in previous reports was attributable to one-way analyses and the frequent
146
occurrence of the CL in the same ovary as the DF. The positive relationships among number of
147
follicles, RO, and the ovary containing the future DF have been confirmed using intraovarian
148
patterns; more predeviation follicles occurred in RO when the RO later developed the DF
149
(DF−CL/RO or DF/RO pattern/side) (Table 2) [37]. There was no significant difference between
150
LO and RO when the ovary did not contain the DF (devoid pattern or CL pattern). The RO of
151
ovulatory wave 2 is more likely to have more 6-mm growing follicles before deviation and
152
therefore the PF is more likely to be selected from RO [38]. These studies have shown (1) the
153
number of 6-mm predeviation follicles is greater for the RO and for the ovary that later
154
developed the PF and (2) the number of ovulatory waves with the PF in the ovary that had more
155
predeviation follicles is greater than the number of waves with the PF in the ovary that had fewer
156
follicles [38].
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
157
RI PT
140
Mares. In a study of 21 middle-aged mares, there was no indication that number of
158
predeviation follicles per ovary was related to side of ovulation, PF-to-CL relationship, or
159
intraovarian pattern [39].
160 161
Women. In pairs of ovaries with 2.0-to-10.0-mm follicles (presumably before deviation [9], an average of 1.2 more follicles were detected in RO than in LO [40]. Stimulation of follicles
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 8 162
with FSH for IVF purposes, resulted in collection of significantly more oocytes from RO than
163
from LO [41] and is consistent with more follicles in RO. These reports did not consider the
164
intraovarian effect of the PF. Conclusion. In heifers, the RO and presence of the future DF but not the CL have a
166
positive association with number of follicles in RO during the common growth phase. In women,
167
more 2 to 10 mm follicles were detected in the RO apparently before deviation. In contrast, no
168
differences between RO and LO in number of follicles were found in middle-aged mares. More
169
follicles in RO during the common growth phase in heifers and women but not in mares matches
170
the species that do and do not have a greater frequency of ovulation from RO.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
165
171 172 173
4. Side of ovulation and intraovarian patterns
175
TE D
174
Heifers. The PF−CL pattern of the ovulatory wave in each of two-wave and three-wave IOI is more frequent in RO than LO (Table 3) [38,42] at both the beginning and end of IOI. That
177
is, ovulation is more frequent in RO only when the regressed CL is also present in RO. The side
178
of the future PF or selection of the ovulatory follicle is established by the end of the deviation
179
process. That is, the formation of the PF−CL pattern develops during the common growth phase
180
and is manifested after the beginning of diameter deviation. The greater frequency of the PF−CL
181
pattern likely represents a two-way positive coupling between CL and future PF when they are in
182
the same ovary and adjacent (Section 7). During Days 0 to 2, the mean growth rate is greater for
183
most follicles that are adjacent to the CL. On day of deviation, the antrum of the future DF is
184
closer to the CL wall than for the future largest subordinate. The positive effect of CL on
AC C
EP
176
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9 adjacent follicles contributes to the likelihood that the largest follicle (future PF) will develop in
186
the ovary with CL. This is more likely to occur in RO owing to the RO predilection for more
187
predeviation follicles (Section 3) on the side of the CL (dictated by side of the ovulation at
188
beginning of IOI) and side of PF at end of IOI. In contrast to the greater frequency of the PF−CL
189
pattern (ipsilateral relationship), a difference in frequency between RO and LO for the PF pattern
190
(contralateral relationship) was not detected in either ovulatory wave 2 (two-wave IOI) or
191
ovulatory wave 3 (three-wave IOI) (Table 3).
SC
192
RI PT
185
Another phenomenon is also displayed in Table 3 as indicated by a greater frequency of the PF pattern (contralateral relationship) than the PF−CL pattern (ipsilateral relationship) in
194
wave 3 but not in wave 2. This is a complication in studies of side of ovulation and is attributable
195
to a switch in destiny for dominance from the larger follicle to a smaller follicle during the
196
synchrony between the common growth phase and luteolysis in wave 3 by a mechanism that is
197
discussed in Section 6. In ovulatory wave 2 of heifers, the greater frequency of RO ovulation
198
involves a greater number of follicles (section 3) and more frequent development of the PF−CL
199
pattern in RO during predeviation. These factors underlie the predilection for RO ovulation (Fig.
200
2). Switching of the side of future PF from the side of the regressing CL can be to the opposite
201
ovary and thereby would change the relationships between number of follicles and side of PF
202
that were described for ovulatory wave 2. The reports that ovulation frequency is greater for RO
203
are from averaging many observations that included both ovulatory waves 2 and 3. That is, the
204
complexities of the PF−CL vs PF patterns in ovulatory waves 3 as a consequence of switching
205
were masked by the pooling of two-and three-wave IOI.
206 207
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
193
Studies in cattle on the physical interrelationships between follicles and CL did not find support for an effect of side on (1) differences in vascular perfusion during the conversion in
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10 208
intraovarian patterns between the preovulatory and postovulatory periods (Section 5), (2) two-
209
way effects between DF and CL when adjacent in the DF−CL ovary (Section 7), and (3)
210
variations in the follicle diameter characteristics of deviation [43]. Mares. In a survey totaled for 13 reports (9048 observations), ovulation occurred
212
significantly more frequently from LO (53%) than from RO (47%) [44]. In a subsequent study,
213
mares that were young and had not been pregnant previously had a greater ovulation frequency
214
from LO (n = 122; 61%) than RO (79; 39%) [17]; mares that had been pregnant did not differ in
215
ovulation frequencies between LO (922; 52%) and RO (867; 48%). The reason for loss of
216
ovulation asymmetry after pregnancy is not known. Speculatively, the hypertrophy of the
217
vasculature in each ovary in association with the massive development of large follicles and
218
luteal structures in this species on Days 40−180 of pregnancy [44] may negate the predilection
219
for ovulation from LO. No reports were found which considered LO vs RO in the number of
220
luteal structures during pregnancy. An association between ovarian pattern and side of ovulation
221
was not found in middle-aged mares with an unknown history of previous pregnancies (Table 3)
222
[42].
SC
M AN U
TE D
Women. Greater frequency of ovulation from RO is well established in women (eg, 55%
EP
223
RI PT
211
vs 45%) (reviewed in [23]). The side of ovulation was not affected by the presence or absence of
225
the CL in the ovary with the PF in a study of 100 ovulations (unpublished).
226
AC C
224
Conclusion. In heifers and women, ovulation is more frequent from RO whereas in adult
227
mares ovulation frequency is similar between RO and LO. In heifers, the PF in ovulatory waves
228
2 and 3 is more frequently in RO when the CL is present (PF−CL/RO pattern/side) than for the
229
PF−CL/LO pattern side indicating that both the PF and CL are associated with an increase in
230
frequency of ovulation in RO. During the common growth phase of wave 3, the largest follicle
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11 may regress when adjacent to the regressing CL, thereby increasing the frequency of the PF
232
pattern and CL pattern (contralateral relationship). In mares and women, the side of ovulation is
233
not affected by presence or absence of the CL. This may reflect the relatively longer interval
234
from the completion of CL regression to ovulation (follicular phase) in mares and women than in
235
heifers.
RI PT
231
236
238
SC
237
5. Frequency of consecutive ipsilateral and contralateral relationships
240
M AN U
239
Heifers. It has been long known that averaged for all waves the DF is more likely to develop in the ovary with the CL (ipsilateral relationship) [45]. More recent studies have
242
indicated that the DF-to-CL relationship is influenced by wave sequence and by number of
243
waves per IOI. Combined for six reports [36,37,46−49], the frequency of the ipsilateral
244
relationship (DF−CL pattern and devoid pattern) was significantly greater than contralateral
245
relationship (DF pattern and CL pattern) during wave 1 (306 vs 231; 57% vs 43%). To illustrate
246
differences among reports, a study with > 300 cattle found no differences in the frequency of
247
ipsilateral vs contralateral relationships during wave 1 [27]. The frequencies of the two
248
relationships in the combined six cited reports were similar for anovulatory and ovulatory wave 2
249
(343 vs 334; 51% vs 49%), and the frequency of the contralateral relationship was significantly
250
greater during ovulatory wave 3 (176 vs 90; 66% vs 34%). The greater frequency of the
251
ipsilateral relationship in wave 1 is attributable at least in part to the greater frequency of the
252
contralateral relationship in wave 3 of the previous IOI (Section 6). The percentage of heifers
253
with each of the four possible relationship conversions from the preovulatory period of the
AC C
EP
TE D
241
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12 254
previous IOI to postovulatory period of wave 1 and the associated intraovarian patterns are
255
shown (Fig. 3). Most (88%) conversions in relationships from the ovulatory wave to wave 1 of
256
the next IOI were reversals. An interpretation for involvement of both the continuity in vascular perfusion or
RI PT
257
angioarchitecture and number of predeviation follicles per ovary in the conversion of
259
intraovarian patterns from preovulation to postovulation is illustrated (Fig 4) [49]. The
260
angioarchitectural aspect assumes that the major arteries that supply the large preovulatory
261
follicle carry over into postovulation to supply the developing CL. This is consistent with the
262
depicted continuity between periods in the vascular perfusion index. The considerable
263
vascularity of PF and the resulting postovulatory CL apparently extends to the surrounding tissue
264
and is associated with more 2-mm (preovulatory) and 6-mm (postovulatory) follicles. More
265
follicles in the preovulatory ovary and a CL from ovulation of the PF result in the DF−CL
266
pattern of wave 1 and more predeviation follicles in an ovary increases the likelihood that the DF
267
will be in that ovary (Section 3). The CL pattern in the contralateral preovulatory relationship is
268
most likely to convert to a devoid postovulatory pattern owing to continuing decrease in vascular
269
perfusion from the regressing CL. The decrease in vascular perfusion is associated with fewer 2-
270
mm follicles preovulatory and 6-mm follicles postovulatory. That is, a postovulatory CL does
271
not form owing to the previous absence of a PF, and the likelihood of the formation of a DF is
272
diminished from fewer follicles resulting in a devoid pattern. In ovulatory wave 2 of two-wave
273
IOI, the frequencies are similar between ipsilateral and contralateral relationships [50] apparently
274
because wave 2 is not preceded by the vascular perfusion and follicle population of a
275
preovulatory period.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
258
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13 Mares. A study of 485 consecutive ovulations did not find an effect of relationships and
277
ovarian patterns of an ovulatory wave on the ovulatory wave of the next IOI (Table 3) [42]. It is
278
not known whether a major anovulatory wave will influence the relationships in an adjacent
279
ovulatory wave in individual mares with more than one major wave per IOI. Measurable
280
repeatability in individuals between consecutive IOI does occur in length of the IOI, diameter of
281
the preovulatory follicle on Days −3 to −1, number of follicles per wave, and circulating
282
concentrations of FSH and LH during the ovulatory wave [51].
SC
283
RI PT
276
Women. Ovulation occurred more often (87%) from alternate ovaries based on histologic dating of the CL and corpus albicans [52], and another report indicated that the side of
285
consecutive ovulations may influence pregnancy rate [53]. Reports of ovulation from CL ovary
286
(same as ovulation from same ovary at each end of IOI) have been inconsistent (reviewed in
287
[54]). In another primate (monkeys), the sides of consecutive ovulations have been reported to
288
occur randomly [55] and alternately [56]. In women, an unpublished study indicated that side of
289
two consecutive ovulations was available in 50 IOI from records of individual follicles identified
290
from day to day by transvaginal ultrasonic imaging [9]. There were no significant differences in
291
frequencies between ipsilateral (52%) and contralateral (48%) relationships or in consecutive
292
ovulations from the same (52%) vs alternate (48%) sides. A report on 286 pairs of consecutive
293
ovulations in women concluded that the side of ovulation did not affect the subsequent side of
294
ovulation [54].
TE D
EP
AC C
295
M AN U
284
Conclusion. The DF-to-CL relationship or intraovarian patterns can affect the
296
relationships and intraovarian patterns of a subsequent wave in species (eg, cattle) with multiple
297
major waves in an IOI. Conversions of ovarian patterns between the ovulatory wave and the
298
adjacent wave 1 are influenced by continuity in vascular perfusion and number of follicles per
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 14 ovary. In species (eg, horses, humans) or individuals without a major anovulatory wave
300
preceding the ovulatory wave, the relationship and ovarian patterns of an ovulatory wave do not
301
influence the characteristics of the next ovulatory wave based on reports with large numbers of
302
subjects.
RI PT
299
303 304
6. Switching. Negative one-way effect of regressing CL on adjacent follicles
SC
305 306
Deviation in heifers has been partitioned into classes depending on the diameter of F2
308
when F1 is 8.5 mm (expected deviation). The classes are (1) conventional (F2 ≥ 7.0 mm), (2)
309
undersized (F2 < 7.0 mm), and F1,F2 switched (two largest follicles switch in destiny to become
310
the DF vs largest subordinate) [43]. Switching between the future F1 and F2 occurs during
311
predeviation and the luteal phase (functional CL), and has been reported for heifers, mares, and
312
women (reviewed in [11]). The largest follicle during the common growth phase that was
313
destined to become DF loses its status and the second-largest follicle assumes favored status and
314
becomes the DFs. The switching during the luteal phase occurs when the FSH surge is near the
315
ending nadir and the largest follicle is unprepared to respond to the low FSH concentration. The
316
largest follicle is replaced by the next largest follicle during a subsequent increase in FSH. This
317
section concerns another form of switching that occurs in heifers when the common growth
318
phase is in synchrony with the luteolysis during ovulatory wave 3.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
307
319
Heifers. Several studies relate to a reported greater frequency of a contralateral
320
relationship in ovulatory wave 3 than in other waves [25,46,47,57−59]. The conclusion from
321
these reports is that a switch in follicle destiny from future dominant to future subordinate in
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15 wave 3 occurred when the largest follicle during the common growth phase was adjacent to the
323
regressing CL (Fig. 5) [60−62]. As a test, luteolysis was induced with prostaglandin F2α
324
(PGF2α) during the common growth phase. The destiny of the largest follicle changed in 13 of
325
36 waves from future dominant to future subordinate when the follicle to CL relationship was
326
ipsilateral than when contralateral 0 of 19. Furthermore, the growth rate was reduced for many
327
predeviation follicles that were adjacent to the regressing CL. These studies showed that the
328
largest follicle often does not become the DF when adjacent to a regressing CL during the
329
common growth phase. A smaller follicle becomes the DF in either ovary thereby accounting for
330
an increase in the frequency of the contralateral relationship.
SC
M AN U
331
RI PT
322
Switching during luteolysis may account for the report in lactating cows that the CL was in the RO more often before induction of luteolysis by a PGF2α analog 50 to 60 days postpartum
333
[18]; but the induced ovulation was more often in LO. This may have represented switching from
334
RO to LO. In another species (monkeys), ovulation tends to occur contralaterally when the
335
follicular phase is shorter (eg, 14 days) and randomly when the follicular phase is longer [63]. It
336
is not known whether these observations involve predeviation switching during luteolysis. Mares and women. Switching of follicle destiny during luteolysis has not been
EP
337
TE D
332
considered in mares and women. Luteolysis and the common growth phase of the ovulatory
339
wave may be asynchronous in individual mares [64] and women [9] and would likely negate the
340
switching phenomenon during luteolysis in most individuals.
341
AC C
338
Conclusion. The greater frequency of the contralateral relationship during wave 3 in
342
cattle is attributable to decreased blood flow to the largest follicle during the common growth
343
phase when adjacent to the regressing CL. Another follicle is therefore selected to become the
344
DF. The newly selected DF may be in either ovary thereby increasing the frequency of the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 16 345
contralateral relationship in wave 3. Further study may show that switching of future dominance
346
to a smaller follicle during luteolysis also occurs in species other than cattle depending on the
347
timing in an individual between the common growth phase and luteolysis.
RI PT
348 349 350
7. Positive intraovarian effect between an active CL and adjacent follicles
SC
351
Heifers. During the common growth phase and extending to postdeviation, dimensions of
353
the future DF and CL and percentage of each structure with blood-flow color-Doppler signals are
354
greater when the DF and CL are in the same ovary and especially when adjacent [50,65−68]. The
355
two-way positive coupling occurs in wave 1 and wave 2 (Fig. 6) [65]. The positive coupling
356
between PF and CL does not occur in wave 3 owing to CL regression during predeviation
357
(Section 6) [50]. Specific indications [50,68] on the positive effect of the developing CL on the
358
follicles in the common growth phase include (1) when F1 is 5.5 mm, follicles that are < 2 mm
359
distant from the CL are an average of 1-mm larger than follicles ≥ 2 mm distant from the CL, (2)
360
the future DF is closer to the CL than the future largest subordinate, and (3) a correlation
361
indicated that the larger follicles on Day 0 were closer to the CL [68]. Greater vascular perfusion
362
of the DF−CL ovary occurs when DF and CL are adjacent than when separated. The two-way
363
coupling is no longer detectable by the last few days of a two-wave IOI owing to luteal
364
regression [68]. However, greater vascular perfusion specifically for the PF wall occurs on Days
365
−2 and −1 when the regressed CL is in the same ovary than when the CL is in the opposite ovary
366
[68]. It appears that the enhanced function of the PF when in the ovary with regressing CL may
367
represent the local effect of the CL on the PF that was initiated at predeviation during the luteal
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
352
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 17 phase. In this regard, vascular perfusion on the day of breeding is greater in the wall of the PF in
369
heifers that become pregnant than in those that do not [69], and the vascular perfusion is
370
positively related to the success of IVF and embryo development [70]. The report in cows that a
371
CL in RO on Day 8 produced more progesterone than for a CL in LO [16] may be a reflection of
372
greater CL blood flow but location of the DF was not reported.
373
RI PT
368
It has been proposed [65] but not documented that the positive (this section) and negative effects (Section 6) between follicles and CL, represent functional angiocoupling wherein either
375
structure signals for an increase in blood flow (two-way positive effect between DF and CL) or a
376
decrease in blood flow (one-way negative effect of CL regression on adjacent predeviation
377
follicles). This proposal assumes that a common arterial branch internal or external to the ovary
378
supplies both structures. Although the intraovarian system of arterial branching apparently has
379
not been described for cattle, a drawing of the intraovarian arterial system in humans shows a
380
common intraovarian branch to the DF and adjacent CL [71]. An older speculation is that each
381
structure produces a substance (eg, progesterone, estrogen) that has a positive effect on the other
382
through diffusion or a venoarterial pathway [58,72]. However, functional angiocoupling seems a
383
more reasonable interpretation as indicated by the following: (1) the coupling of the DF and CL
384
operates in two directions, (2) the positive two-way coupling on DF occurs in wave 1 when the
385
CL is developing (Days 0 to 2) and also in wave 2 when the CL is mature, and (3) a positive two-
386
way effect during both the luteal phase and the one-way negative effect of a regressing CL on
387
adjacent follicles during luteolysis.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
388
SC
374
Mares and women. Positive or negative functional coupling between DF and CL
389
apparently has not been considered in species other than cattle. However, a report in women
390
concluded that the CL has a negative effect on neighboring follicles during the mid- and late-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 18 391
luteal phases [73]. It was suggested that the CL of women secrets a factor that affects
392
neighboring follicles and is reviewed.
393
395
RI PT
394
8. Overall conclusions
396
The predilection of the RO for more follicles during the common growth phase in cattle
SC
397
and women (Section 3) underlies the greater RO frequency for selection of the DF in major
399
anovulatory waves and the PF in ovulatory waves (Section 4). In cattle, the number of ovulatory
400
waves with the PF in the ovary that has more ≥ 6-mm predeviation follicles is greater than the
401
number of waves with the PF in the ovary that has fewer follicles. In addition, the RO
402
predilection for ovulation in cattle utilizes a positive intraovarian effect for the PF−CL pattern;
403
ovulation from RO is more frequent than from LO only when RO contains the regressed CL. The
404
functional CL has a positive effect on adjacent follicles during predeviation and thereby
405
increases the likelihood that the largest follicle (future PF) will develop in the RO with the CL.
406
The RO predilection for ovulation may include more efficient intraovarian vascular perfusion in
407
association with more follicles during predeviation and may in turn have a favorable impact on
408
the growing follicles and oocytes from RO (Section 2) and on selection of the DF or PF (Section
409
3). A fetal origin of more follicles in RO than in LO is supported by research on fetal ovaries,
410
although limited. It is unlikely that RO predilection is established between birth and sexual
411
maturity or by differences in location of the ovaries to other abdominal organs considering its
412
occurrence in many species of farm and laboratory animals and women. Greater RO activity can
413
be altered by the complexities of spatial relationships between follicles and CL. In wave 3 in
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
398
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 19 cattle, selection of the future DF can switch between ovaries owing to close proximity of a
415
regressing CL to the largest predeviation follicle (Section 6). As a result, the frequency of the PF
416
pattern (contralateral relationship) increases and the frequency of ovulation from RO decreases.
417
Predilection of RO for number of predeviation follicles and for side of ovulation has
418
ramifications for applied research owing to the need for high-quality oocytes for efficient
419
fertilization rate in vivo and in vitro.
The impact of a major follicular wave on the next wave has been demonstrated in a
SC
420
RI PT
414
species (bovine) with consistent multiple major waves in each IOI (Section 5). Continuity in
422
number of follicles and the extent of vascular perfusion are involved in the greater frequency of
423
conversion of a contralateral relationship during the last wave of an IOI to an ipsilateral
424
relationship in wave 1. In species (horses, humans) that usually have only one major wave per
425
IOI, the ovulatory wave, an effect of one wave on another has not been convincingly
426
demonstrated.
TE D
427
M AN U
421
A preferred overall interpretation is that the phenomena described herein are more likely from spatial and vascular harmony between intraovarian structures rather than from local passage
429
of hormones or factors. Vascular relationships seem more likely for the interplay between CL
430
and adjacent follicles in cattle considering especially that local effects between CL and a follicle
431
are positive on both structures during predeviation in the luteal phase (Section 7) and negative on
432
the largest predeviation follicle during luteolysis (Section 6).
434 435
AC C
433
EP
428
Acknowledgments
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 20 436 437
The author thanks the Eutheria Foundation for financial support and S.V. Dangudubiyyam for assistance with word processing and figure preparation.
438
440
RI PT
439
References
441
1. Adams GP, Matteri RL, Kastelic JP, Ko, JCH, Ginther OJ. Association between surges of
SC
442
follicle-stimulating hormone and the emergence of follicular waves in heifers. J Reprod Fertil
444
1992;94:177−88.
447 448 449 450 451
Anim Endocrinol 2018;65:91−4.
3. Bergfelt DR, Ginther OJ. Relationships between FSH surges and follicular waves during the estrous cycle in mares Theriogenology 1993;39:781−96.
TE D
446
2. Ginther OJ. An FSH booster surge for resurgence of the preovulatory follicle in heifers. Dom
4. Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Characterization of ovarian follicular dynamics in women. Biol Reprod 2003;69:1023−31.
5. Ginther OJ, Knopf L, Kastelic JP. Temporal associations among ovarian events during
EP
445
M AN U
443
bovine oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. J Reprod Fertil 1989;87:223−30.
453
6. Jaiswal RS, Singh J, Adams GP. Developmental pattern of small antral follicles in the bovine
454 455
AC C
452
ovary. Biol Reprod 2004;71:1244−51. 7. Baldrighi JM, Siddiqui MAR, Ginther OJ. Temporal relationships between minor,
456
preovulatory, or periovulatory FSH surges and the emergence and development of 2-mm
457
follicles of wave 1 in Bos taurus heifers. Dom Anim Endocrinol 2016;57:80−4.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 21 458 459 460
8. Adams GP, Singh J. Ovarian follicular and luteal dynamics in cattle. In: Hopper RM, ed. Bovine Reproduction. Ames, IA: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2015:219–44. 9. Ginther OJ, Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Bergfelt DR, Baerwald AR, Pierson RA. Comparative study of the dynamics of follicular waves in mares and women. Biol Reprod 2004;71:1195–
462
201.
RI PT
461
10. Ginther OJ. The theory of follicle selection in cattle. Dom Anim Endocrinol 2016;57:85−99.
464
11. Ginther OJ. Spontaneous switching of future dominance to a smaller follicle: commonality
466 467 468 469
among monovular species. Biol Reprod 2018;99:1129−36.
12. Ginther OJ. Systemic and intrafollicular components of follicle selection in mares. Dom Anim Endocrinol 2017;59:116−33.
M AN U
465
SC
463
13. Son WY, Das M, Shalom-Paz E, Holzer H. Mechanisms of follicle selection and development. Minerva Ginecol 2011;63:89−102.
14. Mihm M, Evans ACO. Mechanism for dominant follicle selection in monovulatory species:
471
A comparison of morphological, endocrine and intraovarian events in cows, mares, and
472
women. Reprod Dom Anim 2008;43:48−56.
TE D
470
15. Gereš D, Ževrnja B, Žubčić D, Zobel R, Vulić B, Staklarević N, Gracin K. Asymmetrical
474
functional activities of ovaries and tubular part of reproductive organs of dairy cows.
475
Veterinarski Arhiv 2011;81:187−98.
AC C
476
EP
473
16. Trigal B, Diez C, Muñoz M, Caamaño JN, Goyache F, Correia-Alvarez E, Corrales FJ, Mora
477
MI, Carrocera S, Martin D, Gómez E. Elements of functional genital asymmetry in the cow.
478
Reprod Fertil Dev 2014;26:493−501.
479 480
17. Ginther OJ. Effect of reproductive status on twinning and on side of ovulation and embryo attachment in mares. Theriogenology 1983;20:383−91.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 22
484 485 486 487 488 489
19. Casida LE, Chapman AB, Rupel IW. Ovarian development in calves. J Agric Res 1935;50:953−60.
RI PT
483
of the function of the left and right bovine ovaries. Theriogenology 2015;84:724–31.
20. Kidder HE, Barrett GR, Casida LE. A study of ovulations in six families of HolsteinFriesians. J Dairy Sci 1952;35:436−44.
21. Mittwoch U, Kirk D. Superior growth of the right gonad in human foetus. Nature
SC
482
18. Karamishabankareh H, Hajarian H, Shahsavari M, Moradinejad R. In vivo and in vitro study
1975;257:791−2.
22. Palubinskas G, Žilaitis V, Juozaitienė V, Laučience L, Juodžentis V, Gavelis A, Sederevičius
M AN U
481
490
A. Superovulatory response in relation to the size and side of ovary location in high yielding
491
dairy cows on the first day of treatment protocol. Veterinarski Arhiv 2016;86:65−76.
493
23. Fukunda M, Fukuda K, Andersen CY, Byskov AG. Right-sided ovulation favors pregnancy more than left-sided ovulation. Human Reprod 2000;15:1921−6.
TE D
492
494
24. Echternkamp SE, Cushman RA, Allan MF, Thallman RM, Gregory KE. Effects of ovulation
495
rate and fetal number on fertility in twin-producing cattle. J Anim Sci 2000;85:3228−38. 25. Townson DH, Tsang PCW, Butler WR, Frajblat M, Griel LC, Jr. Johnson CJ, Milvae RA,
EP
496
Niksic GM, Pate JL. Relationship of fertility to ovarian follicular waves before breeding in
498
dairy cows. J Anim Sci 2002;80:1053−8.
499
AC C
497
26. Miura R, Izumi T. Relationships of the conception rate and the side (left or right) of
500
preovulatory follicle location at artificial insemination in dairy heifers. Anim Sci J
501
2018;89:328−31.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 23 502
27. Miura R, Haneda S, Kayano M, Matsui M. Development of the first follicular wave dominant
503
follicle on the ovary ipsilateral to the corpus luteum is associated with decreased conception
504
rate in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2014;98:318−21. 28. Hylan D, Giraldo AM, Carter JA, Gentry Jr. GT, Bondioli KR, Godke RA. Sex ratio of
506
bovine embryos and calves originating from the left and right ovaries. Biol Reprod
507
2009;81:933−8.
510
SC
509
29. Giraldo AM, Hylan D, Bondioli KR, Godke RA. Distribution of sexes within the left and right uterine horns of cattle. Theriogenology 2010;73:496−500.
30. Pierson RA, Ginther OJ. Follicular populations during the estrous cycle in heifers. II.
M AN U
508
RI PT
505
511
Influence of right and left sides and intraovarian effect of the corpus luteum. Anim Reprod
512
Sci 1987;14:177–86.
514 515 516
31. Rajakoski E. The ovarian follicular system in sexually mature heifers with special reference to seasonal, cyclical, and left-right variations. Acta Endocrinol 1959;34:1−68.
TE D
513
32. Matton P, Adelakoun V, Couture Y, Dufour JJ. Growth and replacement of the bovine ovarian follicles during the estrous cycle. J Anim Sci 1981;52:813–20. 33. Dufour J, Ginther OJ, Casida LE. Corpus luteum action on ovarian follicular development
518
after destruction of macroscopically visible follicles in ewes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
519
1971;138:475–8.
521
AC C
520
EP
517
34. Dufour J, Ginther OJ, Casida LE. Intraovarian relationship between corpora lutea and ovarian follicles in ewes. Am J Vet Res 1972;33:1145–6.
522
35. Bartlewki PM, Beard AP, Rawling NC. Ultrasonographic study of the effects of the corpus
523
luteum on antral follicular development in unilaterally ovulating western white-faced ewes.
524
Anim Reprod Sci 2001;65:231−44.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 24 36. Ginther OJ, Hoffman MM. Intraovarian effect of dominant follicle and corpus luteum on
526
number of follicles during a follicular wave in heifers. Theriogenology 2014;82:169–75.
527
37. Ginther OJ, Hoffman MM. Interactions of side (left and right ovary) with the number of
528
follicles per ovary and with the intraovarian relationships between dominant follicle and
529
corpus luteum in heifers. Theriogenology 2016;86:907−13.
530
RI PT
525
38. Ginther OJ, Dangudubiyyam SV. Effect of number of 6-mm predeviation follicles and
intraovarian patterns on right-side ovulation in heifers. Anim Reprod Sci; Accepted, Jan,
532
2019.
39. Ginther OJ, Domingues RR, Dangudubiyyam SV, Araujo ER. Concentrations of follicle
M AN U
533
SC
531
534
stimulating hormone associated with follicle selection, number of follicles, and ipsilateral vs
535
contralateral relationships in mares. Theriogenology 2018;113:159−65.
536
40. Jokubkiene L, Sladkevicius P, Valentin L. Number of antral follicles, ovarian volume, and vascular indices in asymptomatic women 20 to 39 years old as assessed by 3-dimensional
538
sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:1635−49.
539
TE D
537
41. Lan KC, Huang FJ, Lin YC, Kung FT, Lan TH, Chang SY. Significantly superior response in the right ovary compared with the left ovary after stimulation with follicle-stimulating
541
hormone in a pituitary down-regulation regimen. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2269−73.
543 544 545 546 547
42. Ginther OJ, Dangudubiyyam SV. Factors affecting side of ovulation in heifers and mares.
AC C
542
EP
540
Anim Reprod Sci 2018;199:72−8. 43. Ginther OJ. Variations in follicle-diameter deviation and growth spurt in the dominant follicle at deviation in Bos taurus heifers. Anim Reprod Sci 2018;188:155−64. 44. Ginther OJ. Reproductive Biology of the Mare: Basic and Applied Aspects, 1st edition. Cross Plains, WI: Equiservices Publishing; 1979.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 25 548 549 550
45. Savio JD, Keenan L, Boland MP, Roche JF. Pattern of growth of dominant follicles during the estrous cycle in heifers. J Reprod Fertil 1983;83:663−71. 46. Ginther OJ, Bashir ST. Length of the luteal phase and frequency of the four permutations between two or three follicular waves and ipsilateral or contralateral locations of the corpus
552
luteum and preovulatory follicle in heifers. Theriogenology 2013;80:114–9.
553
RI PT
551
47. Ginther OJ, Bashir ST, Rakesh HB, Hoffman MM. Hormone concentrations temporally associated with contralateral and ipsilateral relationships between the CL and preovulatory
555
follicle during the third follicular wave in heifers. Theriogenology 2013;80:738–47. 48. Ginther OJ, Rakesh HB, Hoffman MM. Complex interrelationships among corpus luteum,
M AN U
556
SC
554
557
preovulatory follicle, number of follicular waves, and right or left ovaries in heifers.
558
Theriogenology 2014;81:481–9.
559
49. Ginther OJ, Siddiqui MAR, Baldrighi JM, Hoffman MM. Conversion of intraovarian patterns from preovulation to postovulation based on location of dominant follicle and corpus luteum
561
in heifers. Theriogenology 2015;83:153–61.
562
TE D
560
50. Ginther OJ, Siddiqui MAR, Baldrighi JM. Effects of conversion of follicular activity from wave 1 to wave 2 and proximity of wave 2 follicles to CL in heifers. Theriogenology
564
2015;83:1241–8.
51. Jacob JC, Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Carvalho GR, Beg MA, Ginther OJ. Temporal relationships
AC C
565
EP
563
566
and repeatability of follicle diameters and hormone concentrations within individuals in
567
mares. Reprod Dom Anim 2009;44:92–9.
568 569
52. Gougeon A, Lefevre B. Histological evidence of alternating ovulation in women. J Reprod Fertil 1984;70:7−13.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 26 570
53. Fukuda M, Fukuda K, Tatsumi K, Shimizu T, Nobunaga M, Byskov AG, Andersen CY. The
571
ovulation pattern during three consecutive menstrual cycles has a significant impact on
572
pregnancy rate and sex of the offspring. Fertil Steril 2011;95:2545−7.
574 575
54. Check JH, Dietterich C, Houck MA. Ipsilateral versus contralateral ovary selection of
RI PT
573
dominant follicle in succeeding cycle. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:247−49.
55. Clark JR, Dierschke DJ, Wolf RC. Hormonal regulation of ovarian folliculogenesis in rhesus monkeys. III. Atresia of the preovulatory follicle induced by exogenous steroids and
577
subsequent follicular development. Biol Reprod 1981;25:332−41.
SC
576
56. Hodgen GD. The dominant ovarian follicle. Fertil Steril 1982;38:281−300.
579
57. Ginther OJ, Bashir ST, Hoffman MM, Beg MA. Endocrinology of number of waves per
580
estrous cycle and contralateral or ipsilateral relationship between corpus luteum and
581
preovulatory follicle in heifers. Dom Anim Endcrinol 2013;45:64–71.
M AN U
578
58. Ginther OJ, Santos VG, Mir RA, Beg MA. Progesterone concentration when the future
583
ovulatory follicle and corpus luteum are located in ipsilateral or contralateral ovaries in
584
heifers. Theriogenology 2013;79:534–40.
59. Ginther OJ, Rakesh HB, Bashir ST, Hoffman MM. Relationship between days of the
EP
585
TE D
582
luteolytic period and locations of the preovulatory follicle and CL in interovulatory intervals
587
with two or three follicular waves in heifers. Theriogenology 2014;81:787–96.
588
AC C
586
60. Ginther OJ, Baldrighi JM, Siddiqui MAR, Bashir ST, Rakesh HB. Mechanism for greater
589
frequency of contralateral than ipsilateral relationships between corpus luteum and ovulatory
590
follicle for wave 3 in heifers. Theriogenology 2016;85:361−7.
591 592
61. Siddiqui MAR, Ginther OJ. Switching of largest follicle from dominant to subordinate status when follicle and CL are in same ovary in heifers. Theriogenology 2014;82:259–65.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 27 593
62. Ginther OJ, Siddiqui MAR, Baldrighi JM, Hoffman MM. Intraovarian factors associated
594
with switching of a future dominant follicle to a subordinate follicle during induced
595
luteolysis in heifers. Theriogenology 2015;83:786–96.
600 601 602 603 604 605 606
RI PT
599
64. Santos VG, Bettencourt EM, Ginther OJ. Hormonal, luteal, and follicular changes during initiation of persistent corpus luteum in mares. Theriogenology 2015;83:757–65.
SC
598
in the rhesus monkey. Fertil Steril 1973;24:715−21.
65. Ginther OJ, Siddiqui MAR, Baldrighi JM. Functional angiocoupling between follicles and adjacent corpus luteum in heifers. Theriogenology 2016;86:465−71.
M AN U
597
63. Wallach EE, Virutamasen P, Wright K. Menstrual cycle characteristics and side of ovulation
66. Dominques RR, Ginther OJ. Angiocoupling between the dominant follicle and corpus luteum during waves 1 and 2 in Bos taurus heifers. Theriogenology 2018;114:109−15. 67. Ginther OJ, Rakesh HB, Hoffman MM. Blood flow to follicles and CL during development of the periovulatory follicular wave in heifers. Theriogenology 2014;82:304−11.
TE D
596
68. Ginther OJ, Siddiqui MAR, Baldrighi JM, Hoffman MM. Effect of intraovarian proximity between dominant follicle and corpus luteum on dimensions and blood flow of each structure
608
in heifers. Theriogenology 2014;82:875–83.
609
EP
607
69. Siddiqui MAR, Almamun M, Ginther OJ. Blood flow in the wall of the preovulatory follicle and its relationship to pregnancy establishment in heifers. Anim Reprod Sci
611
2009;113:287−92.
612
AC C
610
70. Siddiqui MAR, Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Almamun M, Beg MA, Ginther OJ. Relationship of
613
vascular perfusion of the wall of the preovulatory follicle to in vitro fertilization and embryo
614
development in heifers. Reproduction 2009;137:689−97.
615
71. Redmer DA, Reynolds LP. Angiogenesis in the ovary. J Reprod Fertil 1996;1:182−92.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 28 616
72. Fogwell RL, Lewis GS, Butcher RL, Inskeep EK. Effects of ovarian bisection on response to
617
intrafollicular injection of PGF2α and on follicular development in ewes. J Anim Sci
618
1977;45:328−35.
620
73. Fukuda M, Fukuda K, Andersen CY, Byskov AG. Does corpus luteum locally affect follicular growth negatively? Human Reprod 1997;12:1024−27.
621
SC
622
RI PT
619
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
623
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 29 624
Table 1. Abbreviations used in text, tables, and figures.
625 BF = blood flow color-Doppler signals as a percentage of follicle wall or luteal tissue.
627
CL= corpus luteum (functional or regressed during preovulatory period).
628
Day 0 (uppercase D) = day of ovulation. day 0 (lowercase d) = for other references.
629
DF = dominant follicle. F1 and F2 = future and established DF and largest subordinate.
630
IOI = interovulatory interval. LO and RO = left and right ovaries.
631
PF = preovulatory follicle or DF during the ovulatory follicular wave.
SC
RI PT
626
M AN U
632 633
AC C
EP
TE D
634
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2. Number of follicles in ovulatory wave 2 that
636
reached 6 mm in LO and RO for the four intraovarian
637
patterns in heifers.
638 639 640 641
LO
RO
DF−CL/Ipsilateral
2.0 ± 0.2
3.2 ± 0.4*
642
Devoid/Ipsilateral
1.3 ± 0.3
0.8 ± 0.2
643
DF/Contralateral
1.9 ± 0.2
3.1 ± 0.4*
644
CL/Contralateral
1.2 ± 0.2
1.7 ± 0.4
645
649 650
Adapted from [38] with permission.
TE D
648
different (P < 0.05).
EP
647
An asterisk (*) indicates that the two means are
AC C
646
M AN U
Pattern/Relationship
SC
635
RI PT
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 31 Table 3. Effect of PF-to-CL relationship, intraovarian pattern, and side (LO and RO)
652
on number and frequency of ovulation (Ov.) as indicated by side of preovulatory
653
follicle (PF) in heifers and middle-aged mares.
Heifers Two waves
Three waves
PF−CL/Ipsilateral
LO
52 (35%)a
18 (32%)a
660
RO
98 (65%)b
39 (68%)b
661
Sum
150 (49%)
LO
76 (48%)
663
RO
80 (52%)
664
Sum
156 (51%)
666 667 668 669
70 (34%)a
119 (50%)
137 (66%)b
118 (50%)
57 (29%)x
207 (41%)x
237 (49%)
69 (50%)
145 (50%)
116 (47%)
68 (50%)
148 (50%)
132 (53%)
137 (71%)y
293 (59%)y) 248 (51%)
TE D
665
PF/Contralateral
Ov. wave
ab Percentages in heifers with a different letter between sides and within the PF−CL pattern and each number of waves per IOI are different (P < 0.05).
EP
662
xy Percentages in heifers with a different letter between patterns within three waves per IOI are different (P < 0.05).
AC C
659
Sum
M AN U
Pattern/Relationship Side
Mares
SC
654 655 656 657 658
RI PT
651
670
No significant differences in mares between patterns, relationships, or sides.
671
Adapted from [42] with permission.
672 673
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 32 674
Figure legends
675 Figure 1. Terminology in a monovulating species for diameter deviation (upper panel), switching
677
in follicle destiny between F1 and F2 during predeviation in wave 3 so that the smaller follicle
678
becomes dominant (middle panel) and between DF-to-CL relationships and among intraovarian
679
patterns (lower panel). The devoid pattern indicates an ovary with neither DF or PF nor CL. The
680
diameters for the upper two panels are for heifers. Although the diameters in mares and women
681
are larger, the relative diameters are similar among the three species.
SC
RI PT
676
M AN U
682
Figure 2. Frequency pathway for ovulatory wave 2 for IOI with a single ovulation at the
684
beginning and end of IOI; the remaining heifers had three-wave IOI (not shown). The number of
685
6-mm growing follicles in an ovary during the common growth phase (predeviation) was
686
determined in 105 of the 306 waves. The greater frequency of the PF in RO is attributable to
687
more 6-mm predeviation follicles in RO. Postdeviation, the frequency of the PF−CL pattern in
688
RO is greater than for LO but the frequency of the PF pattern is not different between ovaries;
689
that is, a greater frequency of RO ovulation occurred only when the CL was in the same ovary as
690
the PF. An asterisk indicates a difference (P < 0.05) between the indicated patterns. Designed
691
from published data [38,42]. CL, corpus luteum. IOI, Interovulatory interval. LO and RO, left
692
and right ovaries. NS, nonsignificant.
EP
AC C
693
TE D
683
694
Figure 3. Percentage of heifers that converted from an indicated PF-to-CL relationship of the
695
preovulatory period (ovulatory wave of previous IOI and preovulatory portion of wave 1) to the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 33 696
indicated DF-to-CL relationship of the postovulatory period (postovulatory portion of wave 1).
697
Alternating relationships occurred in 88% of conversions. Adapted from [49] with permission.
698 Figure 4. Left panel: Mean ± SEM for vascular perfusion index (1 minus resistance index) during
700
conversion of intraovarian patterns between the preovulatory and postovulatory periods. ab =
701
Indexes within conversion patterns with a different letter are different (P < 0.05). The number of
702
growing follicles is shown for each period. xyz = Number of follicles within each of the
703
preovulatory and postovulatory periods with no common letters are different (P < 0.05). Right
704
panel: An interpretation on the nature of the influence of an intraovarian pattern during the
705
preovulatory period on the postovulatory pattern of wave 1 through presumed continuity of
706
vascular perfusion and number of follicles per intraovarian pattern. Conversion of intraovarian
707
patterns from contralateral to ipsilateral relationships and from ipsilateral to contralateral are
708
depicted and interpreted above and below the broken line, respectively. The association of the
709
vascular index for each intraovarian pattern is shown for each conversion. Adapted from [49]
710
with permission.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
711
RI PT
699
Figure 5. Upper panel: Mean ± SEM for concentration of progesterone (P4) for four
713
permutations from two DF to CL relationships and two waves/IOI. The day of emergence of the
714
future DF at 6.0 mm for two-wave and three-wave IOI was 11 and 16 days after ovulation,
715
respectively. abc = within a day means with no common letter are different (P < 0.05). Adapted
716
from [47] with permission. Lower panel: Mean ± SEM for P4 and diameter of the future and
717
established DF normalized to the day of emergence of the follicle at 6.0 mm for the contralateral
AC C
712
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 34 718
DF-to-CL relationship in wave 3. The diameter of DF on the day of the beginning of a mean
719
decrease in P4 is shown by the broken lines. Adapted from [58] with permission.
720 Figure 6. Mean ± SEM for color-Doppler signals of blood flow in the DF wall (upper panel) and
722
blood-flow signals in the CL tissue (lower panel) during waves 1 and 2 in two-wave IOI (N =
723
24). Ovarian patterns are DF−CL (DF and CL in the same ovary) and DF or CL (DF and CL in
724
opposite ovaries). The DF of waves 1 and 2 are designated DF1 and DF2, respectively. The
725
percentage of blood-flow signals were significantly different for DF and for CL within each
726
wave. The mean day of expected deviation is shown for each wave. DF1, dominant follicle of
727
wave 1. DF2, dominant follicle of wave 2. Adapted from [66] with permission.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
721
728
AC C
EP
TE D
729
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Terminology Established DF (F1)
Deviation
12
Common growth phase
10
Established largest subordinate (F2)
6
2
–3
14 12
Other subordinates
Future largest subordinate (F2) Deviation
SC
4
–2 –1 0 1 2 3 Days from diameter deviation
Switching
Spontaneous
10 8 6
4
M AN U
Follicle diameter (mm) in heifers
8 Future DF (F1)
RI PT
14
Induced
2 –1 0 1 Days from PGF2α
TE D
20 18 19 17 Days after ovulation
Intraovarian patterns
Preovulatory period
Ipsilateral relationship
Ipsilateral relationship
EP
Luteal period
Devoid
AC C
Contralateral relationship
5
Devoid Contralateral relationship
Figure 1.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
RO
Number of 6-mm follicles (1.8 ± 0.1)
Number of 6-mm follicles (2.3 ± 0.1)
PF−CL 52 (41%) Postdeviation
*
* 76 PF (59%)
PF−CL 98 (55%) NS
Preovulation
M AN U
* PF in LO 128 (42%)
*
EP
TE D
Fig. 2
AC C
PF 80 (45%)
SC
Common growth phase
LO
RI PT
Two-wave IOI 306 (61%)
PF in RO 178 (58%)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Ovarian pattern conversions in heifers Postovulatory
Contralateral
Ipsilateral
PF CL
DF–CL Devoid
Ipsilateral
Contralateral
PF–CL Devoid Contralateral
Contralateral
PF CL PF–CL Devoid
M AN U
Ipsilateral
CL DF
Ipsilateral DF–CL Devoid
AC C
EP
TE D
Figure 3.
17 (65%)
6 (23%)
SC
CL DF
n (%)
RI PT
Preovulatory
1 (4%)
2 (8%)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Heifers
C
Preovulatory period
Postovulatory period
Number of follicles
b
PF
Contralateral relationship
Ipsilateral relationship
a
Increasing BF of developing PF. More 2-mm follicles
cl Devoid
6.6 z
1.5
b
Decreasing BF of regressing cl. Fewer 2-mm follicles
yz 7.1 y 1.4 c
CL DF
c
Decreasing BF of regressing cl. Fewer 2-mm follicles
Increasing BF after low levels. More 2-mm follicles
Ovulation
–2 –1
0
1
2
3
EP
–4 –3
Continued decrease in BF. Fewer 6 mm follicles opposes location of DF Contralateral relationship
Continued low BF. Fewer 6-mm follicles opposes location of DF
Devoid
c
TE D
Devoid
11.0 x
3.4x
M AN U
PF–cl
Continued increase in BF. More 6-mm follicles favors location of DF
Devoid
y
Ipsilateral relationship
a
4
–4
Days from ovulation
AC C
Vascular perfusion index
Continuation of angioarchitecture affects wave 1 intraovarian patterns
SC
b
DF–CL
2 mm 8.1y
6 mm 3.1 x
Postovulatory period
Angioarchitecture meets blood flow (BF) requirements of intraovarian patterns
RI PT
Preovulatory period
on
Vascular perfusion of ovary
of vascular pe uity rfu n i t si n o
Continued increase in BF. More 6-mm follicles favors location of DF
Pattern conversion
–3
–2
–1
0
Days from ovulation Figure 4.
1
2
3
P4
Heifers ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT a
12
a
10
ab
8
b
a b
6
a
a
a
b
a a
b
4
b
2
c
c
0
b c
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Days after ovulation 14
18
P4
12
16
10
14
DF
8
4 2 0 –3
–2
M AN U
12
6
–1
0
1
2
3
10 8 6 4 4
TE D
Days from follicle emergence at 6 mm in wave 3
AC C
EP
Figure 5.
Diameter (mm)
SC
Concentration (ng/mL)
Relationship Waves/IOI 2 waves Ipsilateral Contralateral 2 waves 3 waves Ipsilateral Contralateral 3 waves
a
RI PT
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Heifers Wave 1
DF2–CL
DF1–CL
30 20
DF1
DF2
10
80
M AN U
0 CL blood-flow DF1–CL signals
DF2–CL
CL
CL
60 40
TE D
% of CL tissue
RI PT
DF blood-flow signals
SC
% of follicle wall
40
Wave 2
20
Deviation 1
Deviation 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
AC C
EP
Days from ovulation Figure 6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights 1. Right ovary ovulation is more frequent in heifers and women but not in mares. 2. Right ovary ovulation is associated with greater oocyte quality.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
3. A predilection for more follicles per wave favors right ovary ovulation.