Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and shifts microbiota structure

Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and shifts microbiota structure

Journal Pre-proof Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and shifts microbiota structure Hai-Yan Zhang, Priscila Goncalves...

6MB Sizes 0 Downloads 54 Views

Journal Pre-proof Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and shifts microbiota structure Hai-Yan Zhang, Priscila Goncalves, Elizabeth Copeland, Shan-Shan Qi, Zhi-Cong Dai, Guan-Lin Li, Cong-Yan Wang, Dao-Lin Du, Torsten Thomas PII:

S0038-0717(20)30036-5

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107739

Reference:

SBB 107739

To appear in:

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Received Date: 16 August 2019 Revised Date:

23 January 2020

Accepted Date: 2 February 2020

Please cite this article as: Zhang, H.-Y., Goncalves, P., Copeland, E., Qi, S.-S., Dai, Z.-C., Li, G.-L., Wang, C.-Y., Du, D.-L., Thomas, T., Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and shifts microbiota structure, Soil Biology and Biochemistry (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.soilbio.2020.107739. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1

Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and

2

shifts microbiota structure

3

Hai-Yan Zhanga,b, Priscila Goncalvesc, Elizabeth Copelandc, Shan-Shan Qi a,d,e,f, Zhi-

4

Cong Daia,c,d,e,*, Guan-Lin Lid,e, Cong-Yan Wangd,e, Dao-Lin Dua,d,e,*, Torsten Thomasc

5

a

6 7

212013, PR China b

8 9

c

d

Institute of Environment and Ecology, Academy of Environmental Health and Ecological Security, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, PR China

e

14 15

Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia

12 13

Changzhou Environmental Monitoring Center, Puqian Street 149, Changzhou 213000, PR China

10 11

Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Xuefu Road 301, Zhenjiang

School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Xuefu Road 301, Zhenjiang 212013, PR China

f

16

Ecology and Evolution Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia

H.Y. Zhang and P. Goncalves contributed equally to this work. *

Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (Z. C. Dai), [email protected] (D. L. Du).

1

17

Abstract

18

Modifications in soil fertility and microbiota structure driven by invasive plants can initiate a

19

self-promoting mechanism that facilitates their invasion process. This study aimed to resolve

20

how the progression of invasion affects the chemical, biochemical and microbial properties of

21

soil using Conyza canadensis, a widespread and noxious invasive farmland weed, as a model.

22

Different stages of the invasion process were simulated by growing C. canadensis and a non-

23

invasive crop, Lactuca sativa, at different relative densities. Increasing invasion levels (i.e.

24

increasing invader relative densities) resulted in altered properties of the soil, with an overall

25

increase in nutrient supply and enzymatic activities as invasion intensified. Threshold

26

changes in available nitrogen, organic matter and catalase activity in the soil were identified

27

at invasion levels of 69%, 50% and 47%, respectively. Increasing invasion levels also

28

affected the structure of the soil microbiota, with substantial changes occurring in the relative

29

abundance for a number of bacterial and fungal taxa, including some that are relevant to

30

nutrient cycling. Such changes in soil abiotic and biotic composition driven by C. canadensis

31

might lead to positive plant-soil feedbacks that could promote the establishment and spread

32

of the invasive weed.

33 34

Keywords: Plant invasion · Soil microbiota · Chemical properties · Biochemical properties ·

35

Microbial communities

2

36

1. Introduction

37

Invasive weeds have been considered one of the major threats to the structure and functioning

38

of global ecosystems (Lövei, 1997; van der Putten et al., 2007; D'Antonio et al., 2017),

39

leading, for example, to substantial economic losses in agriculture (Duncan et al., 2004). The

40

progression of the invasion process is known to be strongly related to soil properties as well

41

as to the composition and functional capabilities of soil microbial communities (van der

42

Putten et al., 2007; Jordan et al., 2008; Lorenzo et al., 2013; Dai et al., 2016; Kong et al.,

43

2017). Belowground microbial communities play important roles in soil nutrient cycling and

44

provision of essential plant nutrients (Trognitz et al., 2016). Successful invasion by weed

45

species has been associated with the establishment of plant-soil feedback mechanisms

46

(Rodriguez-Echeverria et al., 2013). Plant-soil feedback has been widely studied in both

47

natural and agricultural systems, and it occurs when plants directionally alter the soil abiotic

48

and biotic properties that influence their growth, with consequent effects on the plant

49

community dynamics and agricultural systems (Mariotte et al., 2018; Bennett and

50

Kliromomos, 2019). Plants can associate with a range of bacterial and fungal mutualists,

51

which are all important drivers of plant-soil feedback (Mariotte et al., 2018). Besides,

52

invasive plants may influence microbial community structure through allelopathic root

53

secretions or litter decomposition (Ehrenfeld et al., 2001), for many exudates are selective for

54

specific soil microbial groups mediating biochemical and nutrient acquisition processes

55

(Kremer, 2014). Evidence also shows that some invasive species are able to establish more

56

positive feedback interactions with the soil microbiota and seem to have greater dependence

57

on these associations than non-invasive crops do (Massenssini et al., 2014; Trognitz et al.,

58

2016).

59

Successful invasion requires that the invasive species moves from its original

60

ecosystem into a new habitat, where it propagates and establishes itself outside its native

3

61

range, followed by a typically rapid spread to eventually form a monoculture through the

62

displacement of the native species. Stages of this invasion process can be characterized by

63

different densities and ratios of native to invasive species. However, current studies on soil

64

properties and microbiota in response to plant invasion have focused only on three stages of

65

the invasion process: (1) monoculture of native species (i.e. no invasion), (2) native and

66

invasive plants mixed in the habitat (usually at equal proportions), and (3) monoculture of

67

invasive species (i.e. invader monoculture) (Lorenzo et al., 2010; Lazzaro et al., 2014; Qin et

68

al., 2014; Kong et al., 2017). An understanding of the impacts of different ratios of invader to

69

native species has however been missing, thus precluding the identification of critical

70

invasion thresholds, where soil resource or ecological processes do not respond linearly to

71

invasion.

72

Conyza canadensis (commonly known as horseweed) is a globally distributed

73

invasive weed, which has been shown to cause considerable impacts on the structure,

74

biodiversity and functioning of many ecosystems, including huge economic losses in

75

agriculture by overgrowing into a dense monoculture and preventing regeneration of other

76

species (Wiese et al., 1995; Queiroz et al., 2012). Worldwide, C. canadensis has been

77

affecting more than 40 main crops, invading orchards, vineyards, hay crops, pastures,

78

rangeland and field crops such as corn, soybean and cotton, particularly where conservation

79

tillage or no-till systems are used (Bruce and Kells, 1990; Buhler, 1992; Wiese et al., 1995;

80

Holm et al., 1997; Weaver, 2001). In China, C. canadensis encroaches a large number of

81

varied agricultural fields from the northeast to the south (Weber et al., 2008). Several studies

82

have identified the factors that contribute to the spread of C. canadensis into new habitats and

83

regions, and these include genetic diversity (Main et al., 2004; Circunvis et al., 2014),

84

evolutionary adaptation (Nandula et al., 2006; Shah et al., 2015) and allelopathic effects

85

(Djurdjević et al., 2011; Queiroz et al., 2012; Zhang, 2017). The density of C. canadensis has

4

86

also been found to be significantly correlated with soil properties (Shontz and Oosting, 1970),

87

and the herbicide resistance of this species has been associated with biotic components in the

88

soil (Schafer et al., 2013). These results indicate that soil abiotic and biotic factors are

89

important for the invasion success of C. canadensis. However, the dynamics and impacts

90

resulting from the interplay between this weed and soil nutrient availability and cycling as

91

well as its associated microbial communities have not been fully explored.

92

In this study, we investigated the effects of the invasion process on the abiotic and

93

biotic properties of soil using C. canadensis as a model due to its ecological and economic

94

significance. The relative abundance of invasive species can be used as an indicator of

95

invasion level since it reflects the contribution of the species to a community, and, as such,

96

the extent or severity of weed invasion in an area, besides being independent of scale and

97

comparable across regions and ecosystems (Catford et al., 2012). Here, progressive levels of

98

invasion were simulated by growing the invasive weed C. canadensis with a non-invasive

99

species at different relative abundances, spanning from 0 to 100% with 25% increments. We

100

hypothesize that these different invasion levels affect the soil chemical and biochemical

101

properties as well as alter the structure of the soil microbial communities. Such changes could

102

then trigger positive feedbacks to support the establishment and dominance of C. canadensis.

103

Based on these hypotheses, we focused this study on addressing three main questions: (1)

104

How do the abiotic and biotic properties of soil change as invasion by C. canadensis

105

intensifies? (2) Are there threshold changes in soil properties dependent on the relative

106

density of C. canadensis? (3) Do such changes support the notion of plant-soil feedback as a

107

driver of invasion by C. canadensis?

108 109

2. Materials and Methods

110

2.1. Study design

5

111

Seeds of the weed Conyza canadensis were collected from a vegetable field near the campus

112

of Jiangsu University (32º12'17"N, 119º30'17"E), Zhenjiang, China, in September 2015, and

113

stored at 4°C. As the non-invasive species, seeds of the crop Lactuca sativa (common lettuce)

114

were purchased from a local merchant company in Zhenjiang, China. The study was

115

conducted from May to September 2016.

116

Seeds of C. canadensis and L. sativa were sterilized with 5% sodium hypochlorite for

117

10 min and rinsed 10 times with sterile distilled water. The soil (loam texture, pH = 8.2) was

118

obtained from a vegetable field near the campus of Jiangsu University, being sieved and

119

thoroughly mixed before seeding. C. canadensis and L. sativa were cultivated in plastic pots

120

(39 × 27 × 9 cm) containing 8 kg of soil and watered with 200 mL sterilized distilled water

121

every two days. Seedlings of C. canadensis and L. sativa with similar sizes (height of

122

approximately 5 cm) were used in the experiment.

123

To explore the effects of invasion by C. canadensis on soil abiotic and biotic

124

properties, different ratios of C. canadensis to L. sativa were used as a proxy to represent

125

successive levels of invasion. A total of four seedlings were grown in each pot, as follows

126

(Fig. 1): (1) No invasion stage included four seedlings of L. sativa (0% invader relative

127

density); (2) Early stage of invasion included three seedlings of L. sativa and one seedling of

128

C. canadensis (25% invader relative density); (3) Intermediate stage of invasion included two

129

seedlings of L. sativa and two seedlings of C. canadensis (50% invader relative density); (4)

130

Dominant stage of invasion included one seedling of L. sativa and three seedlings of C.

131

canadensis (75% invader relative density); (5) Displacement of native/crop species included

132

four seedlings of C. canadensis (100% invader relative density). Soil samples were also

133

placed in pots without plants (bare soil; negative control). Treatments were set up in triplicate

134

and pots were randomly placed in a greenhouse under natural light. Other weeds that very

135

rarely and spontaneously emerged were removed by hand.

6

136 137

2.2. Soil sampling and nutrient assessment

138

Samples of soil were collected from each pot after four months of plant growth for analysis

139

of chemical and biochemical properties and microbial community composition. Soil samples

140

(113 to 122 g from 5 cm of top layer; 5 cm core diameter) were randomly collected from

141

each plot after removal of surface debris (Qin et al., 2014). Samples were homogenized and

142

stored at -80°C in aseptic sealed bags until further processing.

143

The chemical characterization of the soil was performed following the methods

144

described by Bao (2000) (methodological details were in Table S1). Briefly, soil organic

145

matter (SOM) content was measured by the potassium dichromate volumetric method, total

146

nitrogen (TN) content was quantified using the Kjeldahl method, total phosphorus (TP)

147

content was assessed by spectrophotometry using ammonium molybdate, while total

148

potassium (TK) content was determined by flame photometry. The concentrations of

149

available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP) and available potassium (AK) were

150

analyzed following the methods of Conway, spectrophotometry and flame photometry,

151

respectively.

152

The biochemical characterization of the soil involved the quantification of the

153

activities for the enzymes urease, invertase, catalase and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Urease

154

activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 578 nm and expressed as mg of NH4+-N

155

produced per gram of dried soil in 24 h (Nannipieri et al., 1980). Invertase activity was

156

quantified spectrophotometrically at 508 nm using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid method and

157

expressed as mg of glucose produced per gram of dried soil in 24 h (Ohshima et al., 2007).

158

Catalase activity was measured using the potassium permanganate titration method and

159

expressed as mg of KMnO4 produced per gram of dried soil in 30 min (Guan, 1986). ALP

7

160

activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 410 nm using the p-nitrophenyl phosphate

161

salt method and expressed as mg of p-nitrophenol released per gram of fresh soil (Tabatabai,

162

1994).

163 164

2.3. DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing

165

Total DNA was extracted from 250 mg of homogenized soil sample using the PowerSoil

166

DNA Isolation Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (MoBio Laboratories, Inc.,

167

USA). DNA quality was determined by visualization on a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel. The V3-

168

V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pair 338F (5’-

169

ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3’) and 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’).

170

The internal transcribed spacer-1 (ITS1) gene region of fungi was amplified using the primers

171

ITS1F

172

GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3’). The amplified products were examined for integrity

173

and correct fragment sizes by running on a 1.8% (w/v) agarose gel. The amplicons were

174

sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (2 × 250 bp; Illumina Inc., San Diego,

175

USA) by BioMarker Technologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.

176

Sequencing data were processed to remove low quality bases and the paired end reads were

177

assembled using FLASH (version 1.2.7) (Magoc and Salzberg, 2011). Sequences shorter than

178

50 bp or containing low-quality nucleotides (minimum Phred score of 30) were removed

179

using Trimmomatic (version 0.33) (Bolger et al., 2014). Chimeric sequences were removed

180

using UCHIME (version 4.2) (Edgar et al., 2011). Sequences with similarities greater than

181

97% were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UCLUST implemented in

182

QIIME (version 1.8.0) (Edgar, 2010). Taxonomic assignment of bacterial sequences was

(5’-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3’)

8

and

ITS1R

(5’-

183

performed using the SILVA database (version 132) (Quast et al., 2013), while fungal

184

sequences were classified using the UNITE database (version 7.2) (Koljalg et al., 2013).

185

2.4. Statistical analyses

186

Statistical analyses were performed using the R software (version 3.5.1) (R Core Team,

187

2018). The effects of weed invasion on soil chemical and biochemical properties as well as

188

on soil microbial community structure were assessed using univariate and multivariate

189

analyses. Alpha-diversity indexes, including OTU richness, Chao1, Shannon and Inverse

190

Simpson, were calculated for both bacterial and fungal communities. Calculation of alpha-

191

diversity metrics, rarefaction curves and distance-based analysis (PCoA and PERMANOVA

192

using Bray-Curtis distance) were conducted using the R package ‘vegan’ (Oksanen et al.,

193

2019). Linear regression models were used to test the effect of invasion levels on the

194

different chemical and biochemical soil parameters as well as on the alpha- and beta-diversity

195

of the microbial communities. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc comparisons

196

tests were performed to compare the response of the univariate abiotic and biotic parameters

197

among the different invasion levels. Data that did not fit a linear regression model (non-linear

198

response to invasion levels) were further analyzed using locally estimated scatterplot

199

smoothing (LOESS) regression. Invasion thresholds were determined by fitting piecewise

200

linear regressions to chemical, biochemical and microbial data (using the R package

201

‘segmented’). Vector fitting to ordinations (function ‘envfit’ from the R package ‘vegan’)

202

was used to identify the soil abiotic properties that best predicted bacterial and fungal

203

community structures. Multivariate negative binomial models were used to identify the

204

bacterial and fungal sequences most affected by the gradient of invasion (R package

205

‘mvabund’) (Wang et al., 2019). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 for all statistical

206

tests.

207

9

208

3. Results

209

3.1. Chemical and biochemical characterization of soil

210

The gradient of invasion by C. canadensis resulted in modifications in the nutrient and

211

enzymatic composition of the soil, including changes in the concentration of TN, AN, AP and

212

SOM, as well as in the urease, invertase, ALP and catalase activities (Fig. 2). Increasing

213

invasion levels (i.e. increasing invader relative densities) correlated in a linear, positive way

214

with soil TN amount (R2 = 0.38, p = 0.015), and urease (R2 = 0.50, p = 0.003) and invertase

215

activities (R2 = 0.70, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2). However, the majority of the chemical and

216

biochemical parameters showed non-linear responses to increasing invasion levels. AN and

217

AP contents and ALP activity were found to remain stable or slightly reduced as invasion

218

level reached 75%, after which they increased up to 2-fold (p = 0.004), 5-fold (p < 0.001 )

219

and 1.7-fold (p = 0.006), respectively (Fig. 2). SOM content (p = 0.045) and catalase activity

220

(p < 0.001) decreased at 50% invasion level , but then increased in soil samples when

221

dominated by C. canadensis (75% invasion levels) (p = 0.035 for SOM content and p < 0.001

222

for catalase activity), reaching values similar or higher to those of the no invasion stage (Fig.

223

2). Piecewise regression identified invasion levels of 69%, 50% and 47% as critical

224

thresholds for AN, SOM and catalase, respectively, at which the parameters abruptly shifted

225

in direction or magnitude (Fig. 2). No significant differences in soil TK (Fig. 2), AK and TP

226

contents were found among the invasion levels (p > 0.05).

227

Changes in soil abiotic factors driven by C. canadensis resulted in a clear separation

228

among the invasion levels in an ordination plot (Fig. 3), which demonstrates that 0% and

229

25% levels are more similar to each other, while 50% and 75% invasion levels move

230

sequentially away from the non-invaded/low-invaded states through changes mainly in SOM

231

and AK contents, and urease and invertase activities. The C. canadensis monoculture stage

10

232

was found to be the most distinct group and this was mainly driven by changes in ALP

233

activity, and in the amount of AP, AN and TP in soil (Fig. 3).

234 235

3.2. Changes in the diversity and structure of soil microbial communities

236

Sequencing of microbial communities generated a total of 1.01 million bacterial sequences

237

(average of 56,239 sequences per sample) and 1.11 million fungal sequences (average of

238

61,496 sequences per sample). These sequences were clustered into 2,376 and 273 distinct

239

operational taxonomic units (OTUs) for bacteria and fungi, respectively. Rarefaction curves

240

(Fig. S1) and Goods coverage index (min = 99.64 and max = 99.74 for bacteria; min = 99.96

241

and max = 99.99 for fungi) revealed nearly complete sampling of the soils’ microbial

242

communities with the given sequencing effort.

243

The richness and diversity of soil bacterial communities did not change significantly

244

in response to the increasing invasion levels of C. canadensis (p > 0.05) (Fig. 4A). However,

245

we observed a decrease in richness (p = 0.017) and diversity (p = 0.035 for Chao1, p = 0.005

246

for Inverse Simpson and p = 0.014 for Shannon) of fungal communities as the relative

247

density of C. canadensis increased from 0 to 25% (Fig. 4B). At higher invasion levels

248

(invader relative density of 50 to 100%), richness (p = 0.006) and diversity (p > 0.05 for

249

Shannon and Inverse Simpson, and p = 0.011 for Chao1) of fungal communities were found

250

to be similar or slightly higher to the non-invasion stage (Fig. 4B).

251

Beta-diversity analysis showed that the invasion by C. canadensis significantly

252

altered the bacterial and fungal structure of the soil (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001) (Fig. 5). Bare

253

soil (i.e. soil samples kept in pots under the same environmental conditions for the duration

254

of the experiment) exhibited a distinctive microbial community structure when compared to

255

soil samples where any seedling was present. Increasing relative densities of C. canadensis

11

256

were accompanied by more pronounced changes in microbial community structure. Soils

257

with no to low levels of invasion (0 and 25% invasion levels) had similar community

258

structure for bacteria and fungi. At invasion levels higher than 50%, soil exhibited a similar

259

structure for bacterial communities (Fig. 5A), but a divergent structure for fungal

260

communities (Fig. 5B). Vector fitting analyses (using ‘envfit’ function from the R package

261

‘vegan’) revealed that differences in microbial structure across the gradient of C. canadensis

262

densities were strongly correlated with the activity of the enzymes invertase (R2 = 0.49, p =

263

0.025 for bacterial communities, and R2 = 0.54, p = 0.012 for fungal communities) and ALP

264

(R2 = 0.71, p = 0.002 for fungal communities) (Fig. 6 and Table S2).

265

Differences in microbial community structure across the gradient of invasion by C.

266

canadensis were investigated at various levels of taxonomic classification. Soil samples were

267

found to be dominated by bacteria from the phyla Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria,

268

Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes, which together accounted for ~73% of the bacterial

269

community, regardless of the invasion level (Fig. S2). Compared with the non-invasion stage,

270

soils with elevated relative densities of C. canadensis (50 to 100% invasion levels) were

271

enriched in bacteria from the phyla Actinobacteria (p = 0.023) and Chloroflexi (p = 0.011). In

272

contrast, dominance of the invasive weed led to a drop in the abundance of Planctomycetes (p

273

= 0.005) (Fig. 7A).

274

The fungal community of the soil was dominated by members of the phyla

275

Chytridiomycota and Ascomycota, which together made up ~70% of the fungi present in the

276

samples (Fig. S2). Similar to what was observed for the bacterial communities, fungal

277

community structure also changed in response to the gradient of C. canadensis invasion. The

278

presence of C. canadensis (25% relative density) resulted in a decrease in the abundance of

279

fungi from the phylum Ascomycota (2.2-fold) (p = 0.002) (Fig. 6B). Increasing invasion

280

levels (at 75% invasion level) led to a reduction of Chytridiomycota (up to 1.8-fold) (p =

12

281

0.003) compared with 25% invasion level. In addition, fungi from the phylum

282

Glomeromycota were found to be enriched (up to 6-fold) (p = 0.001) at 75% invasion level

283

compared with no-invasion stage (Fig. 7B).

284

A total of 725 bacterial OTUs and 48 fungal OTUs were found to have their

285

abundances significantly affected by the relative density of C. canadensis. The abundances of

286

many of these OTUs were clearly distinct, particularly between soils from no- to low-invaded

287

states (0 to 25% invasion levels) and those from higher invasion levels (50 to 100% invasion

288

levels) (Fig. S3 and Fig. S4). Differentially abundant OTUs in response to C. canadensis

289

invasion included bacteria from the families Sphingomonadaceae (p = 0.003 for OTU20360

290

and p < 0.001 for OTU27857) and Nitrosomonadaceae (p = 0.005) (both from phylum

291

Proteobacteria)

292

Glomeromycota) (p < 0.001) and Thelebolaceae (phylum Ascomycota) (p = 0.012) (Fig. S3).

(Fig.

S3)

and

fungi

from

the

families

Glomeraceae

(phylum

293 294

4. Discussion

295

Increasing ratios of the invasive weed C. canadensis to L. sativa resulted in pronounced

296

changes in soil nutrient composition, with an overall increase in nutrient content and

297

enzymatic activities. Specifically, urease and invertase activities and levels of TN increased

298

linearly with increments in the relative density of C. canadensis, whereas AN, AP, ALP, TK,

299

SOM and catalase activity showed non-linear responses. The non-linear responses were in

300

some cases characterized by clear thresholds, where the parameters (i.e. AN, SOM and

301

catalase) changed dramatically in magnitude and/or direction of response. An evident shift in

302

the response of these parameters was observed when ratios of the weed C. canadensis to L.

303

sativa were between 47% and 69%. Such threshold at particular ratios might represent a key

304

event in the invasion process and would support the concept of ‘threshold of potential

13

305

concern’ (TPC), in which any increase in density beyond the intermediate stage of invasion

306

could present a major threat to biodiversity as well as to ecosystem services and provisions

307

(Foxcroft, 2009). Our findings suggest that the invasive weed C. canadensis, particularly at

308

relative densities higher than 50%, is capable of inducing major alterations in the supply of

309

nutrients with potential downstream effects on soil ecosystem function, which could

310

ultimately facilitate its spread and dominance into the new habitat.

311

In addition to changes in soil nutrient and enzymatic activities, increasing relative

312

densities of C. canadensis triggered shifts in the soil microbiota. We observed a decrease in

313

the diversity of fungal communities at 25% versus 0% of C. canadensis, which could be

314

considered to reflect a comparison of initial invasion with non-invasion stages. Interestingly,

315

despite a drop in alpha-diversity, the fungal community structure has not been changed

316

significantly between those two invasion stages (see Fig. 5B). This observation suggests that

317

the invasion by C. canadensis causes mainly subtle reduction in the evenness of the

318

community and/or in the presence of low abundant members. At invader to native/crop ratios

319

reflecting later stages of the invasion process (e.g. 50-100% invasion levels), bacterial and

320

fungal communities showed different trajectories both in terms of diversity (in Fig. 4) and

321

structure (in Fig. 5).

322

Levels of AN and AP in soil were found to be slightly reduced when C. canadensis

323

was present at relatively low densities (25-50%). This depletion in soil nutrient might be

324

attributed to high uptake by the weed, and/or intense competition with soil microorganisms at

325

the early to intermediate stages of invasion (Zhang et al., 2009). However, once the

326

environment becomes dominated by C. canadensis (75-100% invasion levels), the contents of

327

these nutrients returned or surpassed those observed at the non-invasion stage (0%). This

328

series of sequential modifications in soil abiotic factors could represent a competitive trait for

329

invasive plants, as previously reported for the invasive Australian acacia Acacia dealbata.

14

330

Although areas with a partial coverage of A. dealbata (transition zone between native and

331

invaded vegetation) show lower exchangeable P content compared to non-invaded areas, the

332

concentration of this nutrient increased considerably in areas dominated by the invasive plant,

333

reaching values much higher than those observed in non-invaded areas (Lorenzo et al., 2010).

334

Our study revealed that such changes in nutrient supply are likely to be associated with the

335

interactions between microbial community members and C. canadensis and were correlated

336

with increasing weed relative density (Fig. 8). The ability of invasive plants to selectively

337

alter the soil microbiota through their root exudates and mucilage-derived substances or by

338

litter decomposition has been reported in a number of species (Ehrenfeld et al., 2001;

339

Kulmatiski et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2014; Trognitz et al., 2016), whereas increasing invasion

340

levels might enhance this effect. Modifications in the structure of the soil microbiota can lead

341

to directional transformations of the chemical and biochemical properties of soil, which is

342

instrumental in regulating plant-plant interactions and, consequently, underpin plant

343

composition and diversity (Bever et al., 2010)..

344

A number of studies have demonstrated that microbial community structures in soil

345

change with plant invasion (Wolfe and Klironomos, 2005; Rodrigues et al., 2015; Kong et al.,

346

2017). Rodrigues et al. (2015) showed that the abundance of several specific bacterial and

347

fungal taxa (belonging to the phyla Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria and

348

Ascomycota) were increased with the increasing invasion levels, while Kong et al. (2017)

349

found a drop in Planctomycetes and Actinobacteria. We observed an increased abundance of

350

Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi, and depletion of members of Planctomycetes response to

351

invasion by C. canadensis in our study (compared with no- and low-invaded states). Bacteria

352

from the phylum Actinobacteria are important soil saprophytes capable of breaking down

353

litter in the process of decomposition, thereby affecting remineralization and nitrogen cycling

354

(Jiang et al., 2014). Similarly, the group of photosynthetic bacteria from the phylum

15

355

Chloroflexi (OTU37023, OTU38067 and OTU4941 in Fig. S4), which was found at higher

356

relative abundance in treatments dominated by C. canadensis, can contribute to soil

357

fertilization and promote plant growth (Hug et al., 2013). High invasion levels also correlated

358

with a low relative abundance of some bacteria from the families Nitrosomonadaceae and

359

Nitrospiraceae (OTU37725 and OTU8328), which are known to oxidize ammonium and

360

nitrite, respectively, under aerobic conditions (Daims, 2014; Prosser et al., 2014).

361

Along with some bacterial taxa, mycorrhizal fungi are important decomposers in the

362

soil converting recalcitrant organic materials into accessible forms, and contributing to

363

recycle both N and P (Rodriguez et al., 2004; Wenke, 2008; He et al., 2009). Fungi from

364

phylum Glomeromycota (e.g. OTU7201), which harbors many arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

365

forming symbiotic relationships with plants (Rodriguez et al., 2004), were found at higher

366

relative abundance in soil dominated by C. canadensis. This finding could potentially

367

indicate that symbiotic interaction facilitated invasion by C. canadensis, as previously

368

reported for the myco-heterotrophic plant Thismia sp. (Merckx et al., 2017). Moreover, the

369

family Thelephoraceae (e.g. OTU8536; phylum Basidiomycota), which can form

370

ectomycorrhizae with other fungal members (Haug et al., 2005), was also enriched at high

371

levels of invasion. Yagame and Yamato (2013) found that the ectomycorrhizal formation by

372

Thelephoraceae fungi significantly improved the growth of Cephalanthera falcate. The

373

changes in bacterial and fungal community structure that we observed at invasion levels of

374

50-75% may have contributed to the elevated soil TN content, and the replenishment of AN

375

and AP supply after the enhanced uptake of these nutrients for the growth and establishment

376

of C. canadensis (Fig. 8). Such changes in nutrient cycling might support the positive plant-

377

soil feedback, promoting the spread of the weed species, while suppressing the growth of the

378

crop population.

16

379

The effects of invasive species on the microbial community structure of soil have also

380

been evaluated in previous studies by measuring enzymatic activities (Kourtev et al., 2002;

381

Allison et al., 2006; Souza-Alonso et al., 2014). For instance, the phosphomonoesterase

382

activity has been considered a relevant driver of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere

383

(Rodríguez-Caballero et al., 2017). Nannipieri et al. (2011) showed the close relationship

384

between alkaline phosphomonoesterase and the microbial community structures. Similarly, in

385

our study, soil microbial structure strongly correlated with invertase and ALP activities

386

across the gradient of C. canadensis densities. Enzymatic activities can be seen as measures

387

of nutrient cycling (Lagomarsino et al., 2008). Urease activity was found to be higher with

388

increasing invasion levels, and this might have supported the increased TN content in

389

treatments dominated by C. canadensis, as urease is involved in N cycling (May and

390

Douglas, 1976). The enhanced invertase activity would result in higher SOM (Chase et al.,

391

1962; Chen et al., 2016), since this enzyme is directly related to carbon cycling. However, we

392

did not find such a direct correlation between invertase activity and SOM in the current

393

study. The lowest SOM content observed at 50% invasion level might associate with the

394

reduced abundance of some soil decomposers (e.g. OTU26157; phylum Chytridiomycota, p =

395

0.008) observed at that stage relative to the non-invasion stage. For instance,

396

Chytridiomycota play a crucial role in the decomposition process of cellulose, hemicellulose

397

and lignin, contributing to the regulation of carbon cycle (Barr, 2001; Gadd, 2004; Arellano

398

et al., 2009). In contrast, the relatively high SOM content in treatments dominated by C.

399

canadensis (above 50% invasion level), similar in values to those of the no- to low-invaded

400

states, might be related to the enrichment of bacteria from the family Sphingomonadaceae

401

(e.g. OTU20360, p <0.001 and OTU27857, p = 0.037). Members of this family are

402

commonly found in nutrient-enriched soils and are known for their capacity to utilize a wide

403

variety of carbon sources (Glaeser and Kämpfer, 2014). At 50% invasion level, soil also

17

404

exhibited the lowest catalase activity across the gradient of invasion (Fig. 8), which is

405

contrary to the previous study of Qin et al (2014).

406

In summary, our study shows that the invasive weed C. canadensis induces major

407

changes in both abiotic and biotic components of the belowground ecosystem. The triggering

408

of such changes may represent important functional traits for invasiveness by promoting

409

positive feedbacks that support the ecological dynamics and successful colonization of C.

410

canadensis. The understanding of plant-soil feedback mechanisms involving invasive species

411

can guide towards weed management and sustainable agriculture of crop species. The

412

impacts driven by C. canadensis invasion on soil nutrients and enzymatic activities also

413

indicate that a relative density of around 50% might represent a critical invasion threshold (i.e.

414

‘threshold of potential concern’, TPC) for this species. Identifying critical invasion thresholds

415

and understanding the biogeochemical implications associated with invasive weeds are key

416

steps towards mitigating the impact of invasive plants on soil biodiversity.

417 418

Competing interests

419

The authors declare no competing interests in relation to the work described.

420 421

Acknowledgements

422

This work was supported by the State Key Research Development Program of China

423

(2017YFC1200100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600326,

424

31570414, and 31770446), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu (BK20150503), the

425

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017T100329), the Jiangsu University Research

426

Foundation (15JDG032), the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and

427

Material of Water Treatment, the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher

18

428

Education Institutions (PAPD), and Study Abroad Scholarship of Jiangsu Province & Jiangsu

429

University and the Australian Research Council.

430 431

Author contributions

432

Z.C. Dai, S.S. Qi, D.L. Du and H.Y. Zhang designed the research; H.Y. Zhang, S.S. Qi, G.L.

433

Li and C.Y. Wang performed the experiments; P. Goncalves and E. Copeland performed

434

bioinformatic and statistical analyses; H.Y. Zhang, P. Goncalves and Z.C. Dai wrote the first

435

draft; H.Y. Zhang, P. Goncalves, Z.C. Dai and T. Thomas reviewed the manuscript.

436 437

Appendix A. Supplementary data

438

Supplementary data (Figures S1-S4 and Table S1) to this article can be found online at Soil

439

Biology and Biochemistry’s website.

440

19

441

References

442

Allison, S.D., Nielsen, C., Hughes, R.F., 2006. Elevated enzyme activities in soils under the

443

invasive nitrogen-fixing tree Falcataria moluccana. Soil Biology and Biochemmistry 38,

444

1537–1544.

445

Arellano, M.L., Marano, A.V., Steciow, M.M., 2009. Diversity of zoosporic Fungi and

446

Stramenopila at terrestrial habitats from the Reserva Natural Selva Marginal Punta Lara,

447

Buenos Aires, Argentina. Nova Hedwigia 88, 145–156.

448 449 450 451 452 453

Bao, S.D., 2000. Analysis of soil and agricultural chemistry, 3rd Edition ed. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, China. Barr, D.J.S., 2001. Chytridiomycota, In: McLaughlin, D.J., McLaughlin, E.G., Lemke, P.A. (Eds.), Systematics and Evolution, Part A. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 93–112. Bennett, J.A., Kliromomos, J., 2019. Mechanisms of plant-soil feedback: interactions among biotic and abiotic drivers. New Phytologist 222, 91–96.

454

Bever, J.D., Dickie, I.A., Facelli, E., Facelli, J.M., Klironomos, J., Moora, M., Rillig, M.C.,

455

Stock, W.D., Tibbett, M., Zobel, M., 2010. Rooting theories of plant community ecology

456

in microbial interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25, 468–478.

457 458

Bolger, A.M., Lohse, M., Usadel, B., 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120.

459

Bruce, J.A., Kells, J.J., 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in No-Tillage

460

Soybeans (Glycine max) with Preplant and Preemergence Herbicides. Weed Technology

461

4, 642–647.

20

462 463

Buhler, D.D., 1992. Population Dynamics and Control of Annual Weeds in Corn (Zea mays) as Influenced by Tillage Systems. Weed Science 40, 241–248.

464

Catford, J.A., Vesk, P.A., Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., 2012. Quantifying levels of

465

biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible

466

ecosystems. Global Change Biology 18, 44–62.

467

Chase, A.M., Von Meier, H.C., Menna, V.J., 1962. The non-competitive inhibition and

468

irreversible inactivation of yeast invertase by urea. Journal of cellular and comparative

469

physiology 59, 1–13.

470

Chen, X.L., Chen, H.Y.H., Chen, X., Wang, J., Chen, B., Wang, D., Guan, Q.W., 2016. Soil

471

labile organic carbon and carbon-cycle enzyme activities under different thinning

472

intensities in Chinese fir plantations. Applied Soil Ecology 107, 162–169.

473

Circunvis, B.C., Renesto, E., Mangolin, C.A., Machado, M.F.P.S., Takasusuki, M.C.C.R.,

474

2014. Genetic characterization of Conyza sp. samples in the state of Paraná. Planta

475

Daninha 32, 173–179.

476

D'Antonio, C.M., Yelenik, S.G., Mack, M.C., 2017. Ecosystem vs. community recovery

477

25 years after grass invasions and fire in a subtropical woodland. Journal of Ecology 105,

478

1462–1474.

479

Dai, Z.C., Fu, W., Wan, L.Y., Cai, H.H., Wang, N., Qi, S.S., Du, D.L., 2016. Different

480

growth promoting effects of endophytic bacteria on invasive and native clonal plants.

481

Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1–9.

21

482

Daims, H., 2014. The Family Nitrospiraceae, In: Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S.,

483

Stackebrandt, E., Thompson, F. (Eds.), The Prokaryotes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.

484

733–749.

485

Djurdjević, L., Mitrović, M., Gajić, G., Jarić, S., Kostić, O., Oberan, L., Pavlović, P., 2011.

486

An allelopathic investigation of the domination of the introduced invasive Conyza

487

canadensis L. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 206, 921–

488

927.

489

Duncan, C.A., Jachetta, J.J., Brown, M.L., Carrithers, V.F., Clark, J.K., DiTomaso, J.M.,

490

Lym, R.G., McDaniel, K.C., Renz, M.J., Rice, P.M., 2004. Assessing the economic,

491

environmental, and societal losses from invasive plants on rangeland and wildlands. Weed

492

Technology 18, 1411–1416.

493 494 495 496

Edgar, R.C., 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461. Edgar, R.C., Haas, B.J., Clemente, J.C., Quince, C., Knight, R., 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200.

497

Ehrenfeld, J.G., Kourtev, P., Huang, W.Z., 2001. Changes in soil functions following

498

invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecological Applications 11,

499

1287–1300.

500 501 502 503

Foxcroft, L.C., 2009. Developing thresholds of potential concern for invasive alien species: Hypotheses and concepts. Koedoe 51, 1636–1659. Gadd, G.M., 2004. Mycotransformation of organic and inorganic substrates. Mycologist 18, 60–70.

22

504

Glaeser, S.P., Kämpfer, P., 2014. The Family Sphingomonadaceae., In: Rosenberg, E.,

505

DeLong, E.F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson, F. (Eds.), The Prokaryotes.

506

Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 641–707.

507

Guan, S.Y., 1986. Soil enzyme and its research methods. Agriculture Press Beijing, China.

508

Haug, I., Weiss, M., Homeier, J., Oberwinkler, F., Kottke, I., 2005. Russulaceae and

509

Thelephoraceae

510

(Caryophyllales) in the tropical mountain rain forest of southern Ecuador. New

511

Phytologist 165, 923–936.

512 513 514 515

form

ectomycorrhizas

with

members

of

the

Nyctaginaceae

He, X., Xu, M., Qiu, G.Y., Zhou, J., 2009. Use of 15N stable isotope to quantify nitrogen transfer between mycorrhizal plants. Journal of Plant Ecology 2, 107–118. Holm, L., Doll, J., Holm, E., Pancho, J., Herberger, J., 1997. World weeds: natural histories and distribution. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Toronto, pp. 226–235.

516

Hug, L.A., Castelle, C.J., Wrighton, K.C., Thomas, B.C., Sharon, I., Frischkorn, K.R.,

517

Williams, K.H., Tringe, S.G., Banfield, J.F., 2013. Community genomic analyses

518

constrain the distribution of metabolic traits across the Chloroflexi phylum and indicate

519

roles in sediment carbon cycling. Microbiome 1, 1–23.

520

Jiang, X.Y., Cao, L.X., Zhang, R.D., Yan, L.J., Mao, Y., Yang, Y.W., 2014. Effects of

521

nitrogen addition and litter properties on litter decomposition and enzyme activities of

522

individual fungi. Applied Soil Ecology 80, 108–115.

523 524

Jordan, N.R., Larson, D.L., Huerd, S.C., 2008. Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biological Invasions 10, 177–190.

23

525

Koljalg, U., Nilsson, R.H., Abarenkov, K., Tedersoo, L., Taylor, A.F.S., Bahram, M., Bates,

526

S.T., Bruns, T.D., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Callaghan, T.M., Douglas, B., Drenkhan, T.,

527

Eberhardt, U., Duenas, M., Grebenc, T., Griffith, G.W., Hartmann, M., Kirk, P.M.,

528

Kohout, P., Larsson, E., Lindahl, B.D., Luecking, R., Martin, M.P., Matheny, P.B.,

529

Nguyen, N.H., Niskanen, T., Oja, J., Peay, K.G., Peintner, U., Peterson, M., Poldmaa, K.,

530

Saag, L., Saar, I., Schuessler, A., Scott, J.A., Senes, C., Smith, M.E., Suija, A., Taylor,

531

D.L., Telleria, M.T., Weiss, M., Larsson, K.H., 2013. Towards a unified paradigm for

532

sequence-based identification of fungi. Molecular Ecology 22, 5271–5277.

533

Kong, Y., James, K., Dingkang, W., Heping, H., Kaiyou, G., Yonxia, W., Yun, X., 2017.

534

Effect of Ageratina adenophora invasion on the composition and diversity of soil

535

microbiome. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 63, 114–121.

536 537 538 539 540 541

Kourtev, P.S., Ehrenfeld, J.G., Haggblom, M., 2002. Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology 83, 3152–3166. Kremer, R., J. , 2014. Environmental Implications of Herbicide Resistance: Soil Biology and Ecology. Weed Science 62, 415–426. Kulmatiski, A., Beard, K.H., Stevens, J.R., Cobbold, S.M., 2008. Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecology Letters 11, 980–992.

542

Lagomarsino, A., Moscatelli, M.C., Hoosbeek, M.R., Angelis, P.D., Grego, S., 2008.

543

Assessment of soil nitrogen and phosphorous availability under elevated CO2 and N-

544

fertilization in a short rotation poplar plantation. Plant and Soil 308, 131–147.

545

Lazzaro, L., Giuliani, C., Fabiani, A., Agnelli, A.E., Pastorelli, R., Lagomarsino, A.,

546

Benesperi, R., Calamassi, R., Foggi, B., 2014. Soil and plant changing after invasion: The

24

547

case of Acacia dealbata in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Science of The Total Environment

548

497-498, 491–498.

549

Lorenzo, P., Pereira, C.S., Rodriguez-Echeverria, S., 2013. Differential impact on soil

550

microbes of allelopathic compounds released by the invasive Acacia dealbata Link. Soil

551

Biology and Biochemistry 57, 156–163.

552

Lorenzo, P., Rodríguez-Echeverría, S., González, L., Freitas, H., 2010. Effect of invasive

553

Acacia dealbata Link on soil microorganisms as determined by PCR-DGGE. Applied Soil

554

Ecology 44, 245–251.

555

Lövei, G.L., 1997. Global change through invasion. Nature 388, 627–628.

556

Magoc, T., Salzberg, S.L., 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve

557

genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963.

558

Main, C.L., Mueller, T.C., Hayes, R.M., Wilkerson, J.B., 2004. Response of selected

559

horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) populations to glyphosate. Journal of

560

Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52, 879–883.

561

Mariotte, P., Mehrabi, Z., Bezemer, T.M., De Deyn, G.B., Kulmatiski, A., Drigo, B., Veen,

562

G., Van der Heijden, M.G.A., 2018. Plant-soil feedback: bridging natural and agricultural

563

sciences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 33, 129–142.

564 565 566

Massenssini, A., Bonduki, V., Melo, C., 2014. Soil microorganisms and their role in the interactions between weeds and crops. Planta Daninha 32, 873–874. May, P.B., Douglas, L.A., 1976. Assay for soil urease activity. Plant and Soil 45, 301–305.

25

567

Merckx, V.S.F.T., Gomes, S.I.F., Wapstra, M., Hunt, C., Steenbeeke, G., Mennes, C.B.,

568

Walsh, N., Smissen, R., Hsieh, T.-H., Smets, E.F., Bidartondo, M.I., 2017. The

569

biogeographical history of the interaction between mycoheterotrophic Thismia

570

(Thismiaceae) plants and mycorrhizal Rhizophagus (Glomeraceae) fungi. Journal of

571

Biogeography 44, 1869–1879.

572

Nandula, V.K., Eubank, T.W., Poston, D.H., Koger, C.H., Reddy, K.N., 2006. Factors

573

affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Science 54, 898–902.

574

Nannipieri, P., Ceccanti, B., Cervelli, S., Matarese, E., 1980. Extraction of phosphatase,

575

urease, proteases, organic carbon, and nitrogen from soil. Soil Science Society of America

576

Journal 44, 1011–1016.

577

Nannipieri, P., Giagnoni, L., Landi, L., Renella, G., 2011. Role of phosphatase enzymes in

578

soil., In: Bünemann E., O.A., Frossard E. (Ed.), Phosphorus in Action. Springer, Berlin,

579

Heidelberg, pp. 215–243.

580 581

Ohshima, T., Tamura, T., Sato, M., 2007. Influence of pulsed electric field on various enzyme activities. Journal of Electrostatics 65, 156–161.

582

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin,

583

P.R., O'Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Szoecs, E., Wagner,

584

H., 2019. Vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.5-5.

585

Prosser, J.I., Head, I.M., Stein, L.Y., 2014. The Family Nitrosomonadaceae, In: Rosenberg,

586

E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson, F. (Eds.), The Prokaryotes.

587

Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 901–918.

26

588

Qin, Z., Xie, J.F., Quan, G.M., Zhang, J.E., Mao, D.J., DiTommaso, A., 2014. Impacts of the

589

invasive annual herb Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. on soil microbial carbon source

590

utilization and enzymatic activities. European Journal of Soil Biology 60, 58–66.

591

Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., Glockner,

592

F.O., 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing

593

and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research 41, 590–596.

594

Queiroz, S.C.N., Cantrell, C.L., Duke, S.O., Wedge, D.E., Nandula, V.K., Moraes, R.M.,

595

Cerdeira, A.L., 2012. Bioassay-directed isolation and identification of phytotoxic and

596

fungitoxic acetylenes from Conyza canadensis. Journal of Agricultural and Food

597

Chemistry 60, 5893–5898.

598

R, T.C., 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for

599

Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/.

600

Rodrigues, R.R., Pineda, R.P., Barney, J.N., Nilsen, E.T., Barrett, J.E., Williams, M.A., Liu,

601

J., 2015. Plant invasions associated with change in root-zone microbial community

602

structure and diversity. Plos One 10, e0141424.

603

Rodríguez-Caballero, G., Caravaca, F., Alguacil, M.M., Fernandez-Lopez, M., Fernandez-

604

Gonzalez, A.J., Roldan, A., 2017. Striking alterations in the soil bacterial community

605

structure and functioning of the biological N cycle induced by Pennisetum setaceum

606

invasion in a semiarid environment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 109, 176–187.

607

Rodriguez-Echeverria, S., Afonso, C., Correia, M., Lorenzo, P., Roiloa, S.R., 2013. The

608

effect of soil legacy on competition and invasion by Acacia dealbata Link. Plant Ecology

609

214, 1139–1146.

27

610 611

Rodriguez, A., Clapp, J.P., Dodd, J.C., 2004. Ribosomal RNA gene sequence diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). Journal of Ecology 92, 986–989.

612

Schafer, J.R., Hallett, S.G., Johnson, W.G., 2013. Soil microbial root colonization of

613

glyphosate-treated giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), and

614

common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes. Weed Science 61, 289–295.

615

Shah, M.A., Beaulieu, M.-E., Reshi, Z.A., Qureshi, S., Khasa, D.P., 2015. A cross-city

616

molecular biogeographic investigation of arbuscular mycorrhizas in Conyza canadensis

617

rhizosphere across native and non-native regions. Ecological Processes 4, 7–15.

618

Shontz, J.P., Oosting, H.J., 1970. Factors affecting interaction and distribution of

619

Haplopappus divaricatus and Conyza canadensis in North Carolina old fields. Ecology

620

51, 780–793.

621

Souza-Alonso, P., Novoa, A., Gonzalez, L., 2014. Soil biochemical alterations and microbial

622

community responses under Acacia dealbata Link invasion. Soil Biology and

623

Biochemistry 79, 100–108.

624

Tabatabai, M.A., 1994. Soil enzymes, In: Weaver, R.W., Angle, G. S., Bottomley, P. S. (Ed.),

625

Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 – Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Soil

626

Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 775–833.

627

Trognitz, F., Hackl, E., Widhalm, S., Sessitsch, A., 2016. The role of plant-microbiome

628

interactions in weed establishment and control. Fems Microbiology Ecology 92, 1-15.

629

van der Putten, W.H., Klironomos, J.N., Wardle, D.A., 2007. Microbial ecology of biological

630

invasions. ISME Journal 1, 28–37.

28

631

Wang, Y., Naumann, U., Eddelbuettel, D., Wilshire, J., Warton, D., 2019. Mvabund:

632

Statistical methods for analysing multivariate abundance data. R package version 4.0.1.

633

Weaver, S.E., 2001. The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis. Canadian

634 635 636 637 638

Journal of Plant Science 81, 867–875. Weber, E., Sun, S.G., Li, B., 2008. Invasive alien plants in China: diversity and ecological insights. Biological Invasions 10, 1411–1429. Wenke, L., 2008. N, P contribution and soil adaptability of four arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science 58, 285–288.

639

Wiese, A.F., Salisbury, C.D., Bean, B.W., 1995. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum), Jointed

640

goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) and horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in fallow.

641

Weed Technol 9, 249–254.

642 643

Wolfe, B.E., Klironomos, J.N., 2005. Breaking New Ground: Soil Communities and Exotic Plant Invasion. Bioscience 55, 477–487.

644

Yagame, T., Yamato, M., 2013. Mycoheterotrophic growth of Cephalanthera falcata

645

(Orchidaceae) in tripartite symbioses with Thelephoraceae fungi and Quercus serrata

646

(Fagaceae) in pot culture condition. Journal of Plant Research 126, 215–222.

647 648

Zhang, C.B., Wang, J., Qian, B.Y., Li, W.H., 2009. Effects of the invader Solidago canadensis on soil properties. Applied Soil Ecology 43, 163–169.

649

Zhang, H.Y., Qi, S.S.,Dai, Z.C., Zhang, M., Sun, J.F.,Du, D.L., 2017. Allelopathic potential

650

of flavonoids identified from invasive plant Conyza canadensis on Agrostis stolonifera

651

and Lactuca sativa. Allelopathy J 41, 223–238.

29

652

Zhao, J., Cheng, C., Gu, X., Liu, B., 2014. Effects of root exudates from invasive plant

653

(Mirabilis jalapa) on soil microenvironment under different land-use types. Advanced

654

Materials Research 998–999, 1419–1424.

655

30

656

Figure legends

657

Fig. 1 Experimental design used to assess the effects of invasion by the weed Conyza

658

canadensis on soil properties and microbial community structure. We simulated a gradient of

659

invasion, spanning from 0 to 100% (with 25% increments), by manipulating the relative

660

densities of invasive (C. canadensis) and non-invasive species (the crop Lactuca sativa).

661

Each treatment was set up in triplicate, and soil samples were collected from each pot after

662

four months of plant growth.

663

Fig. 2 Effect of invasion by Conyza canadensis on soil chemical and biochemical properties.

664

Soil nutrient and enzymatic levels show different patterns of response to the gradient of

665

invasion (0 to 100% invasion levels, with 25% increments), including linear and non-linear

666

relationships. Solid lines represent linear or LOESS fits and grey areas denote the 95%

667

confidence intervals. Vertical dotted grey lines indicate breakpoints in response identified by

668

piecewise regressions. TN: total nitrogen (unit: g/kg); AN: available nitrogen (unit: mg/kg);

669

AP: available phosphorus (unit: mg/kg); ALP: alkaline phosphatase; TK: total potassium

670

(unit: g/kg); SOM: soil organic matter (unit: %). Units for enzymatic activity are described in

671

Materials and Methods.

672

Fig. 3 PCA biplot integrating the nutrient and enzymatic levels of soil under different relative

673

densities of the weed Conyza canadensis. Length and color saturation of the arrows indicate

674

the contribution of that parameter to the divergence between treatments (i.e. parameters

675

represented by longer and darker arrows have a stronger contribution to group separation).

676

Fig. 4 Alpha-diversity of microbial communities associated with the different levels of

677

invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis (0 to 100% invasion levels, with 25% increments).

678

Alpha-diversity indexes were calculated for bacterial (A) and fungal (B) communities. Solid

679

lines represent LOESS fits and grey areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.

31

680

Fig. 5 Effect of invasion by Conyza canadensis on soil microbiome composition. Principal

681

coordinate analysis (PCoA) of soil bacterial (A) and fungal (B) communities at the different

682

invasion levels by C. canadensis. Ordinate separation was constructed based on Bray-Curtis

683

dissimilarity matrices and statistical differences between groups were assessed by

684

PERMANOVA.

685

Fig. 6 Correlation between microbial community structure (points and ellipses) and soil

686

abiotic factors (arrows). Non-metric dimensional scaling (NMDS) plots display the soil

687

abiotic variables found to be significantly correlated with bacterial and fungal communities

688

(p < 0.05, R2 > 0.4).

689

Fig. 7 Soil microbial communities strongly associated with the different stages of invasion by

690

Conyza canadensis. Plots display the relative abundance of sequences at the phylum level for

691

bacterial (A) and fungal (B) datasets. Solid lines represent LOESS fits and grey areas indicate

692

95% confidence intervals.

693

Fig. 8 Summary of the major changes in soil abiotic and biotic properties induced by

694

different relative densities of the invasive weed Conyza canadensis. Increasing relative

695

densities of C. canadensis (in combination with decreasing relative densities of Lactuca

696

sativa) are used as a proxy for the successive stages of invasion. The color associated with

697

the different parameters represents the fold-change in concentration or abundance, relative to

698

the non-invaded state (0% invasion level), where blue boxes indicate a decrease in the

699

abundance of a particular parameter (i.e. down-regulation), while red boxes reflect an

700

increase (i.e. up-regulation). Statistical analysis was performed between each displayed

701

invasion level (25-100%) and the non-invaded stage (0%). The boxes with (*) indicated a

702

statistically significant difference at p < 0.05.

32

Gradient of invasion (invader relative density)

Soil

0%

25%

Non-invasive crop Lactuca sativa

50%

75%

100%

Invasive weed Conyza canadensis

TN

1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0

Urease

Invertase

1.8

2.0

1.5

1.0

1.2 AN

AP

6.0

80.0

ALP 10.0

60.0

4.0

40.0

2.0

6.0

20.0

0.0

4.0

TK

40.0

SOM

35.0 30.0 25.0

8.0

0

25

50

75 100

4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5

Catalase

6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0

0

25

50

75 100

Invader relative density (%)

0

25

50

75 100

PCA2 (21.6%)

2

AP AN TP

AK

0%

100% ALP

25%

Catalase

0

TK

TN

50%

SOM Urease

−2

75%

−2

0

Invertase

PCA1 (28.8%)

2

4

Invader relative density 0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

(A)

Richness

2300

Chao1 2300

2200

2200

2100

2100

2000

2000

1900 Shannon

Inverse Simpson

6.8

400

6.7 300

6.6 6.5

200

6.4 6.3

0

25

50

75

100

0

25

50

75

100

Invader relative density (%) (B)

Richness

Chao1

190

200

170

180

150

160 Shannon

Inverse Simpson 20

3.5

15

3.0

10

2.5

5 0

25

50

75

100

0

25

Invader relative density (%)

50

75

100

(A)

(B) 0.1 0% 0.0

100%

100%

25%

PCoA2 (13.5%)

PCoA2 (18.3%)

75%

50%

−0.1

−0.2

0.1 50%

Soil 0.0 0% 25%

−0.1 Soil

p = 0.001 −0.1

0.0

p = 0.001 0.1

0.2

−0.2

PCoA1 (31.1%) Soil

75%

0%

−0.1

0.0

0.1

PCoA1 (19.7%) 25%

50%

75%

100%

0.2

(B)

ALP

NMDS2

NMDS2

(A) Invasion level

Invasion level

50%

Invertase

0%

Invertase

25%

100%

50%

100% 75%

75% 25%

0%

NMDS1

NMDS1

Invader relative density 0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Relative abundance (%)

(A) Actinobacteria

Chloroflexi

8.0

15.0

Planctomycetes 2.0

7.0

12.5

1.5

6.0

10.0

1.0

5.0

7.5

0.5

4.0 0

25

50

75

100

0

25

50

75

100

0

25

50

75

100

Invader relative density (%) Relative abundance (%)

(B) Ascomycota

35.0

Chytridiomycota 70.0

30.0

30.0

60.0

25.0

20.0

50.0

20.0

10.0

40.0

15.0

30.0

10.0 0

25

50

75 100

Glomeromycota

0.0 0

25

50

75 100

Invader relative density (%)

0

25

50

75 100

Highlights Different invasion levels of Conyza canadensis were simulated in pot trials. Nutrients contents and enzyme activities increased with the higher invasion levels. Invasion thresholds were identified for soil nitrogen, organic matter and catalase. Invasion levels affected some microbes related to nutrient-cycling. Positive plant-soil feedback might be involved in the spread of weed C. canadensis.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that there are no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.