Materials
Chrmistr,~
ad
INVESTIGATION
Physics,
II.
MENDYK and
Faculty
of
13
PROPERTIES
OF HYDRO-
CONTROLLED POROUS GLASSES
A.L.
DAWIDOWICZ
Chemistry,
Lublin
Received
14
STUDY OF ADSORPTION
THERMALLY MODIFIED
20-031
13
OF HYDROTHERMALLY TREATED CONTROLLED POROUS
GLASSES [CPGs ).
E.
24 (1989)
Maria
(Poland
February
Curie-Sklodowska
University,
)
6,
1989,
accepted
March
17,
1989
ABSTRACT The is
mechanism
relatively
meters
of
presence In
the
porous of
It
previous
associated
the
residues
paper
[l]
changes
of
modified
CPGs.
results
investigations.
As
depend
on
temperature
directly process
and
mainly
with
are
connected
the
change
the
The
was
of
of
hydrothermal glasses
the
only
surface
of
are
and
of
has
properties
adsorption
with
treatment
isotherms
duration
the
modified.
adsorption
adsorption
para-
(CPGs)
thermogravimetric
and
not
and
being
the
shown.
materials
on different
temperature
porous with
of
siliceous
sorbent
Influence
deals
the
with
process in
the
of
among others
controlled
work
This
hydrothermally
treatment
depends
structure,
discussed.
retie
hydrothermal
different
on structural been
of
complex.
isotachopho-
properties the
structural
modification
rebuilding
but
chemistry.
INTRODUCTION One
sorbent It
is
adsorption
factors
The
in
absolute
form as
volume)
the
0x4-0584/89/$3.50
of
above
employed
is
adsorption
in the
and
in
surface first
of
form
on
properties
mentioned
isotherms
parameters
i.e.
as
of
on
unit.
more
of
the
significantly
comparable
calculated
many diameter
nature
which
materials are
mass
( shape,
chemical
adsorption
per
depends
structure the
of
an adsorption
isotherms area,
all
characterization
calculated
a graphical adsorption
specific
adsorption
adsorption
often
ability
presented
The such
pore
surface.
vary
parameters
usually
isotherm.
and
the
of
using per
0 Elsevicr Sequoia/Printed in The Netherlands
14
surface
area
curves ted
is
unit.
Thus
dependent
surface
the
mainly
(type
and
amount
adsorption
isotherms
are
silica
properties
in
gel
take
place The
vapour
part
leads
to
( CPGs).
These
silica and
during
first
part
[1J
I
structure
8 h ow not but
of
chemical from
the in
The
paper
I
only
of
silica
with
absolute
hydrothermally
[l].The
means
of
surface
investigations
isotachophoresis
and
the
CPG is
porous
CPGs
surfaces.
of of
the
surface
SirB:Na should
isotherms
differ be
adsorption
reflec-
Isotherms.
for
porous
as described
been
in
simultaneous
conditions have
The
described of
changes
and with In
Initial
their
amounts
absolute
glasses
( 106%)
a203
results
in
water
( 94-99x). of
modification
latter
under
measurements
of
The
sdsorptlon
treated
adsorption
derivatographic
the
with porous
amounts
dissolution
mentioned
of
changes
Si02
modification
related
absolute
contact
of
changes
and
investiga-
comparison
controlled
structure
chemical
Thus
above
the
gel.
network
ones).
deals
the silica
in
The for
the
residual
(mutually
the
in
the
[2-S]. that
composed
geometrical
result
the
previous
form
of
suggest
composition
ted glass
also
changes
These rebuilding
shows
Besides,
that
of
structura.1
treatment
mainly
adsorption
centers).
significant
CPG contains
from
of nature
convenient
changes are
Na20 (0.03-0.5%).
position
chemical
active
paper
structural
different
of
which
this
materials of
and
especially
hydrothermal of
framework
quite
form on the
associated
boron
content
CPG skeleton
part
in
with anelyred
and
on the
obtained
from
by
CPG
as well.
EXPERIMENTAL Materials The type
glasses
glass
Na20,
35% B203
materials glaas
and
materials described Table obtained
I.
[7,8].
in
55% Si02.
In
sorbents,
and
Glass
were
porosity
7% Na20,
leached
with
and
order
transform
the
I
sorbents-
I also
to narrow
following two
8 characterized D=l08
hydrothermally
pert
were
23% B203
As a consequence
C type
Table
of
porous
heated
prepared: glass
controlled
and
into
were
procedure were
of
composed
[iland contains
8 and
types
the
10%
crude
of
Vycor
previously
described
of
materials
by D-484
initial g and
cm3/g.
according conditions
phyeicochemioal
Vycor
and/or
these
fractions
the
VP-O.78
treated under
70% Slop
V p=l .02
These to
the
procedure
presented properties
cm3/g
initial in of
the
15
Methods Specific
surface
described
out
Poland)
with
hydrogen out
at
using
part
in
carried
12O’C.
The
peak
as
for
the
of
surface
teflon
with
-
the
the
acid
fine1
placed
thermel
analysis
Hungary).
The
polyvinyl
was
range
10 dsg/min.
During
correction. was employed
structure
procedure of
at
carried
and
was described
anion
20°C out
on
( SOi
bands
a
with
and a migration
comparing the
the
following
2-amino-2-methyl-i-propanol (AMP),
of
( moviol),
alcohol AMP,
corundum
Mass crucibles
recorded
with
( 0.49)
analyzed
2001000°C
loss
a Q-1500 in
pH = 10.5
acid, in
during
the
prepared
differential
0 derivatograph
air
applying
measurement
pH = 8.95
hydrochloric
investigations.
the
samples
temperature
the
As electrolytes
curve.
O.OlM
ric in
performed
diffusion
home made apparatus
were
O.OlM
and
Thermogravimet
were
carried
t
electrolyte:
samples
proper
mm i.d.)
0.2
calibration
electrolyte:
hydrochloric
- the
in
separation using
purified were
Isotachophoresis The
cm long,
and
calculations
estimation
Calculations
applied
initial
content glasses.
(15
Dried
the
were
Elwro-WrocZaw,
measurements
[9,10]with
performed
100 JIA.
were
isotherm
Isotachophoretic
capillary
results
The
were
measurements (N-504,
detector.
Investigations.
zones)was
mixtures
isotherm
phase.
method
porous
investigations
chromatography
a. mobile
boron
[ 111.
of
gas
adsorption
Isotachophoretic
current
of
profile
as a method
and SiOi2
porosimetric
a thermoconductivity used
elsewhere
and
The adsorption
I.
by means
was
the
area
were
heated
a temperature
TG changes
were
( MOM, in
the
rise
at
observed.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION As
follows
porous
from
of
be
found
discussed Figures obtained Table constant
and here
of
they
1 and As can
hydrothermal
(SBET,
The date
were
2 present
the in
time(
the
included
)
depend These
in
I
of
ceuses
the glass
increase
a significant
not
cl]. for
C-type
temperature
the on
variations
are
detail
isotherms
treetments
the
except
msinly
In Table
analyzed
Fig.1,
controlled
treatment
modification.
adsorption
5 hrs
in
VP and D)
already
hydrothermal
be seen
modification
of
changes
hydrothermal
I.
Table as
by various I).
structural
material time
in
I,
a result
initial
temperature ten
as
glasses
geometry
Part
samples ( see at
increase
16
in
adsorption
measured
which
by either
Is
evident
polar
or
from
Table I. The physicochemfcal treated porous glasses. Type
Sample
Time
J
PC
8
The time
of
ChrsJCm2/cd
cc:3/g
&
7
60
1.02
484
6
57
0.94
526
3
200
6
46
0.93
610
250
6
23
0.99
2000
5
300
6
0.77
6750
0.78
108 134
2.0 176
2
150
6
107
0.47
3
200
3
82
0.44
184
4
200
6
52
0.39
260
5
200
12
38
0.35
440
6
250
6
0.28
1832
can
( Fig.
treatment
vapour,
the
6.5
be drawn 2).
higher
The
the
observing
longer
the
influence
of
CPG contact
time
the
adsorption
course
of
absolute
it
was
shown [l]
formation
of
the
with
observed.
Using
electron
treatment
microscopy
leads
structure.
to
the
Structural
to
globular
differences should
diameter
V
4
isotherm
like
Mean pore
PO re
volume
150
same conclusions
water
isotherms
hydrothermally
surface area ,SSET
1
C
of
Specific
1 2
adsorption
substances.
properties
Temperature
code
of glass
the
non polar
in
be
chemical
character
Slop
rather
) are
associated
with
likely The
the
CPG hydrothermal globular
( transition
not
properties.
that
secondary
changes
network
adsorption
the
from
to
cause
observed
modification
sponge
so drastic
phenomenon of
the
surface
nature.
As mentioned CPGs in
their
in
the
siliceous
papers
also
showed
bonded
with
them were
concentration edsorption
of
that
these
properties
introduction
structure
centers
proved
possess
surface strong
and boron
adsorption on the
demonstrated
B203
atoms
and
centers surface,
by the
earlier
[12-141,
residues.
Previous
hydroxyl
groups
C14J. The higher the
investigated
higher
the
sorbents.
proper
6 hrs)
adsorption
the
(for
at
The
treated
1.
written
Fig.
I
600
curves.
samples
isotherms
glass
I
400
I
200
hexane
of
of
~
I
400
I
init.
ISO°C
The
and
of
chloroform temperatures
benzene
8
600
200°C
pressure [hPa]
C-type.
hexane,
200
I
250°C
benzene
1
the
on
200
hydrothermal
initial
400
I
and
chloroform
I
treatments
hydrothermally
600
are
1
2.
isotherms
Fig.
E q
z
zl
E
$-’
,
glasses
influence
for
The
200
hexane
of
of
400
C-type.
hydrothermal
600
12hi-s
modification
time
(at
pressure[hPa]
I
600
I
400
I
200
,12hn
benzene
200°C)
I
on
200
the
form
of
adsorption
I
600
I
4.00
12hrs
chloroform
19
The
varying
surface
determines
glasses
the
Table
II
in
sorbent
one
to
hand
causes
layer.
structure
and of
part
the
inner
glasses.
increase
hand
another
properties
presents
the
porous
of
adsorption
is
of
factor
which
hydrothermally
modified
[15].
8203) ted
hydroxylation
The
per
of
the
of
obtained
analysis{
on the of
B203
meter
were
of
surface.
B203
rise
of
results
of
appears,
the
the on
in
conclusions
the
other surface
drawn
from
I.
Table II. (duration
Influence
of
Sulk
B203
6hrs ) on bulk
Glass *
hydrothermal
and
treatment
surface
boron
Surface
temperature
concentration.
boron
concentration
as
B203
concentration
type
WI
c rg/m2J
c rgfgl
B-l
2.66
21.6
B-3
0.99
1752.6
39.1
B-5
0.35
1897.3
948.7
C-l
2.14
c-2
0.06
8.8
0.05
200.1
1.28
1.87
c-4
1.28
1398.8
26.9
C-6
1.07
2187.3
336.5
*
gram
leads
and on the
concentration
confirm
as
investigaper
temperature
concentration
B20S
the
calculated As it
modification
bulk
expressed
surface
amounts
square
drop
boron
and
CPG hydrothermal
significant
The
data
code
cf.
I.
Table
During
rebuilding
residue
is
surface
together
Taking
dissolved into
sequence
of
with
changes
of
time
hydrothemel
of
As the
boron changes
investigation glass
confirm
B of the
of
water
and
the
distribution
skeleton,
the
( sorbed)
deposited
boron on the
Si02.
data
from
adsorption
Table
can
I
and
( Fig.
isotherms
be expected
the
mutual
2),
analogous
concerning
the
treatment. presented the
a different above
a CPG siliceous
in
condensing
account
absolute
of
boron
are
content
structure
conclusions.
surprising, and was Table
the
boron
carried
II
proves
additional
distribution out
in
that
order the
in
to changes
20
are
similar.
that
the
The
temperature remaining The
B203
autoclave
the
of
and
These
analysis
more
than
all
are
in
phenomena
that
water
significant
not
from
is
at
Table the
the
total
C and
B,
hydrothermal
from
which
of
glass
during
corrosion were
502
for
removed
data
modified
20 and
structure,
suggests
boron and
of
CPG hydrothermally
whole
balance
walls
acid
walls.
of
contains in
some amounts
boric
detailed
surface
the
bed and
confirmed traces
observed
II
shows
highest boron
amount
respectively. treatment
located
on the
by crystalites
on the
during
inner
silica
of
autoclave gel
modifi-
cation. Dependences
of
hydrothermally
mass
treated
3 and
4 ) . It
higher
the
temperature
is
mass loss
Figs.
the
200 Fig. tric with
400
losses
on temperature
glasses can
of
during
600
seem to
be concluded the
for
be very
from
hydrothermal
these
initial
and
interesting plots
treatment,
( see
that
the
the
greater
thermoanalysis.
800
1000"c
3. The mass loss v~ temperature increase during thermogravimeinvestigations for glasses of B-type. Curve number compare the sample code from Table I.
Fig.
4.
The
For
these
mass for
;zn;;r;ments) .
groups
adsorbed
water
According fully
porous of
mass loss
or is
comes
it not
to the
glass)
water
is
which
temperature per
number.
of
water
of
from
200-1000°C. per
loss
2 which
m
originated
is
materials III
would
of
above
are
from
the
III
gel,
total
presented
Table
2OO’C.
( silica
samples
be present
only
Physically
concentration
contains
values
column
surface
measured
investigated
The
Another
of
the OH group
Table the
to water
in micropores.
siliceous
8-9umol/m2.
meter.
OH groups
the whole
of
condensation
enclosed
[16,17]
surfaces
about
range
the
mainly
as mass loss
literature
disappeared
square
from
present
increase (derivatographic Curve number conforms with
corresponds
can be that
hydroxylated
number
if
the
The water
hydroxyl
temperature of C-type.
vs.
glasses
samples
evacuation.
in
loss
shows
on the
amounts
in
the
as
a mole
the
surface
OH group
condensation. As results possess
typical
from Table coverage
III,
the
densities
surfaces
of
the
by OH groups.
initial
materials
Some authors
22
suggest
atoms
that, porous
[lS]
are
hydroxylated
last
suggestion
that
the water
X50-200°C hydroxyl
glass
and the loss
cannot
values
but also
strongly
degree,
glasses
only from
III
it
into
of
Mass loss
structure.
code
Theoritically
H-0 content G
* [W]
B-1
groups
L)tmol/g
0.37
3.42
6.84
B-2
0.45
250
4.38
8.76
0.55
305
6.64
13.28
e-4
0.75
417
18.3.
36.2
B-5
1.27
706
353 .o
706.0
C-l
1.5
833
4.73
c-2
1.2
667
6.23
c-4
1.25
694
13.2
26.4
C-6
2.27
1260
194 lo
386 .O
code
cf,
Table
silica
intraglobular adsorption
gels As it
centers,
was observed
ClQ-221
water.
was’confirmed.
9.46 12.46
I.
The same phenomenon treated
OH
ration
[ pmolfm2]
B-3
*
of
assumed
concent
lJmol/m?J
205
above
surface
Table III. Losses of water during tharmogravimetr~c analysis investi of hydroxyl groups 1 theoritically ated CPGs and yroles assumed 9, that can from measured water amounts. Material
the
modified
.condensation
inner
in boron
account
can be concludsd
hydrothermally
from the
anriched
Taking
from Table
in porous
originate
groups
surfaces
to a higher
In such is in
silica
gels
known that the
in the
case
and was explained
examined
they can significantly groups, materials modified by water.
the
the
in
hydrothermally
presence
micropores
case
share
of
by the
beside
are boron
the observed
presence of
of
micropores
very
strong
and hydroxyl adsorption
far
CONCLUSIONS I.
The
hydrothermal
to the increase The higher the tion
the
2. The
stronger
contact
treatment
of
controlled
of adsorption properties temperature and the longer of
adsorption CPG with
properties water
vapour
porosity
glasses
leads
of the material surface. the time of the modificaare.. causes
the
significant
23
enrichment
of
others
these
3.
The
the
final
atoms
obtained
results
should
increase
the
4.
significant
The
and
the
5.
of
the The
suggest
that
water
CPGs.
boron
hydrothermal
the
Among
modification
hydrothermally for
silica of
time
rise.
of
the
treated
gels
amount
and
a consequence
atoms.
properties.
degree.
from
temperature 1 is
the
results
in
in
adsorption
hydroxylation
of
micropores
hydrothermal
surface
higher
literature
conclusion
points
in
surface loss
analogous
formation with
product
result
point
which
glasses to
the
increases
phenomena
described
in
2-4.
REFERENCES
1 A.L.
Dawidowicz,
E.
Mendyk
-21 ( 1989 ) 463. Kiselev, Yu.S. 2 A.V. 28
Zhurn., 3 A.V. 4 N.V.
Kolloidn.
Zhurn.,
Mater.Chem.Phys.
Oganesian,
Kolloidn.
Nikitin,
Zhurn.,
E.B.
31 ( 1969) A.V.
Baigubekova,
Oganesian
388.
Kiselev
and Yu.S.
Nikitin,
28 ( 1966 ) 164.
Yu.S.
R.
7 W. Hailer, 8 A.L.
T.A.
31 ( 1969
Mendyk,
E.0. Yu.S.
Kolloidn.
Zhurn.,
Kiselev,
end
Lukyanovich,
Sarakhov.,
Akshinskaya,
5 A.V.
Nikitin
M. Wr6be1,
) 662.
V.M.
Kiselev,
and A.I.
6 E.
( 1966
and
Nikitin
and
E.8.
Oganesian,
Kolloidn.
) 525.
Leboda
and A.
J.Chem.Phys.,
Dawidowict,
A.
Gierak,
42
Mater.Chem.Phys.,
(1965)
Waksmundzki
20 ( 1988)87.
686.
and A.
DeryZo,
Chem.Anal.,
24
( 1979 ) 811. 9 T. i
Psryjczak,
Chromatogrsfia
katalizy,
10 E.
Bechtold,
London, 11 A.L. in
gazowa
PWN, Warszawa,
1975,
w badaniach
Gas chromatography,(ed.M.Swaay),
1962,
adsorpcji
p.68. Butterworths,
p.49.
Dawidowicz,
3.
Matusewicr
and J.
A.V.
Kiselev,
V.I.
6 ( 1974)
1584.
Wysocka-Lisek,
Talanta,
press.
12 V.M.
Kirutenko,
Kinetika 13 M.I.D.
i
kataliz,
Low and
14 A.L.
Dawidowicz
15 A.L.
Dawidowicz,
16 V.Y.
Davydov,
N.
Remasubramanian,
and
I.
Choma,
Zhuravlev
-38 ( 1964 ) 2047. The Chemistry 17 R.K. Iler,
of
and
K.L.
Silica,
8 ( 1983
11 ( 1984)
and A.V.
3077.
) 323.
503.
Klselev, Wileyy
Shtchepalin, 71 ( 1957)
J.Phys.Chem.,
Mater.Chem.Phys.,
Mater.Chem.Phys., L.T.
Lygin
Zhurn.Fiz.Khim.,
New York,
1979,
p .633.
24
18
F.
Janowski
f6r 19
N.V.
Akshinskaya,
A.V.
Kiselev,
Kolloidn. 20
N.V.
22
Zhurn.,
R.L.
Gorelik,
E.8.
Oganesian,
W.M.
Chertov
Davydov,
26
( 1964
and
I.E.
VE8 Deutcher chap.
Zhuravlev, Nikitin
Verlag
4. G. Curthoys,
and
V.V.
Rybina,
) 529. A.V.
Kiselev
and Yu.S.
Nikitin,
3.
Zhuravlev,
Kolloidn.
1982, L.T.
Davydov,
28 (1966)
L.T.
Gllser,
Yu.S.
Kuznetsov,
V.Y.
Zhurn.,
Porbse Leipzig,
V.Y. R.N.
Akshinskaya,
Kolloidn. 21
and W, Heyer,
Grundstoffindustrie,
A.V.
Neimark,
Kiselev, 33 ( 1971)
Zhurn., Ukr.
Khim.
Yu.S.
Nikitin
and
51. Zhurn.,
35 (1967)499.