Irreversible Horner's syndrome after bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy

Irreversible Horner's syndrome after bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy

ARTICLE IN PRESS a r c h s o c e s p o f t a l m o l . 2 0 1 4;x x x(x x):xxx–xxx ARCHIVOS DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA DE OFTALMOLOGÍA www.elsevier.es/of...

937KB Sizes 0 Downloads 49 Views

ARTICLE IN PRESS a r c h s o c e s p o f t a l m o l . 2 0 1 4;x x x(x x):xxx–xxx

ARCHIVOS DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA DE OFTALMOLOGÍA www.elsevier.es/oftalmologia

Short communication

Irreversible Horner’s syndrome after bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy夽 P. Vicente ∗ , E. Canelles, A. Díaz, A. Fons Servicio de Oftalmología, Sección de Neurooftalmología, Servicio de Cirugía Torácica, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

a r t i c l e

i n f o

a b s t r a c t

Article history:

Case report: A 19-year-old boy who developed a right Horner’s syndrome after a bilateral

Received 26 July 2010

sympathectomy as a treatment for palmoplantar hyperhidrosis.

Accepted 9 July 2012

Discussion: Horner’s syndrome is defined by the occurrence of miosis, ptosis and enoph-

Available online xxx

thalmos as a result of involvement of sympathetic innervation. This is quite rare, but identification is very important because it may also be an ominous sign secondary to a

Keywords: Horner’s syndrome

neoplasm, neurological diseases, or surgery of the sympathetic chain, as in our case. ˜ © 2010 Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.

Pupil Anisocoria Palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis Ptosis Oculosympathetic paralysis

Síndrome de Horner irreversible tras simpatectomía toracoscópica bilateral r e s u m e n Palabras clave:

˜ Caso clínico: Paciente varón de 19 anos que presenta síndrome de Horner de lado derecho

Síndrome de Horner

tras simpatectomía bilateral como tratamiento a una hiperhidrosis palmoplantar.

Pupila

Discusión: El síndrome de Horner es definido por la aparición de miosis, ptosis y enoftalmos

Anisocoria

como consecuencia de la afectación de la inervación simpática. Es una afectación bastante

Hiperhidrosis palmoplantar

infrecuente, sin embargo es muy importante su identificación, pues puede corresponder

Ptosis

a un signo ominoso secundario a neoplasias, enfermedades neurológicas o a cirugía de la

Parálisis oculosimpática

cadena simpática, como es nuestro caso. ˜ de Oftalmología. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L. Todos los © 2010 Sociedad Espanola derechos reservados.

夽 Please cite this article as: Vicente P, Canelles E, Díaz A, Fons A. Síndrome de Horner irreversible tras simpatectomía toracoscópica bilateral. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2012.07.026 ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (P. Vicente).

˜ 2173-5794/$ – see front matter © 2010 Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved. OFTALE-401; No. of Pages 3

ARTICLE IN PRESS 2

a r c h s o c e s p o f t a l m o l . 2 0 1 4;x x x(x x):xxx–xxx

Introduction Palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis consists in excessive sweating in said areas due to sympathetic nervous system hyperfunction.1,2 One option for treatment is the elimination of said hyper-function by means of sympathectomy or sympatheticolysis through thoracoscopic pathway.3 The possible complications of this technique include pneumothorax, hemothorax and other less frequent complications such as Horner’s syndrome which is usually temporary due to nervous irritation, with permanent injury being exceptional.2,3 Horner’s syndrome can be classified by the level at which the sympathetic pathway is interrupted: it could affect first order neurons, as in vertebrobasilar insufficiency or tumor. It could also affect second order neurons such as in pulmonary carcinoma or thyroid adenoma among others. In addition, it could give rise to a third order neuron disorder, internal carotid dissection, or Tolosa–Hunt syndrome, among others.4 The case presented herein is that of a patient operated on for palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis who exhibited irreversible Horner’s syndrome as a sequel after 2 years’ follow-up without remission.

Clinical case The case is of a male patient, aged 19 years, without relevant history, who underwent bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy for treating armpit and palm-sole hyperhidrosis. During surgery the sympathetic chain ganglions were ablated with electrocoagulation at the level of T2, T3 and T4. The first day after surgery the patient was referred to the Ophthalmology Service after observing anisocoria. Upon ophthalmological examination, the patient exhibited the following: – Slight right eye palpebral ptosis which did not cover the pupil axis and slight elevation of the lower eyelid, or “reverse ptosis” (Figs. 1 and 2). – Miosis in the right eye, increasing anisocoria under soft lighting, small pupil with poor dilatation (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1 – Patient exhibiting right eye miosis, ptosis and discrete enophthalmos after thoracoscopic sympathectomy.

Fig. 2 – Pupil size difference can be observed, with evident right eye miosis.

– Discrete enophthalmos. – Normal ocular movements. For diagnostic purposes, one drop in each eye of 10% cocaine eyedrops was instilled, repeating the application 1 min later. The pupils were examined 15 min later, observing no reaction in the right pupil, whereas the left eye (unaffected) exhibited dilatation, thus confirming Horner’s syndrome. Ptosis was corrected with administration of phenylephrine, a sympathomimetic, as it acts on the innervation of Müller’s muscle which was causing the ptosis (Fig. 3). Even though a majority of cases resolve spontaneously within 6 months, the patient in this report remains with the same clinic after 24 months of follow-up.

Discussion The first description of the Claude Bernard Horner syndrome in humans was published in 1869 by Johann Friedrich Horner, a Swiss ophthalmologist. The syndrome is due to the interruption of the sympathetic innervation of the eye and ocular annexes. It is caused by a range of etiologies including cere-

Fig. 3 – Patient exhibits increased pupil diameter and correction of ptosis after instilling phenylephrine.

ARTICLE IN PRESS a r c h s o c e s p o f t a l m o l . 2 0 1 4;x x x(x x):xxx–xxx

brovascular accidents in the hypothalamus, in the encephalic trunk (Wallenberg syndrome), carotid artery lesions, tumors in the lung upper lobe or pleura and cluster cephalea. It can express as a rare complication of thoracoscopic surgery with incidence ranging between 1% and 5% according to different series. In these cases, the lesion is generally produced in the pre-ganglionary sympathetic fibers close to the stellate ganglion.2–4 It exhibits a pathognomonic clinical triad with miosis and ptosis in the ipsilateral affected eye, and anhidrosis of said hemi-face as a consequence of oculosympathetic chain palsy.5 Other specific findings could be present such as delayed midriasis or enophthalmos in the affected eye, or iris heterochromia in congenital cases. Pharmacological tests for diagnosis are as follows: – 10% cocaine test to dilate pupils inducing sympathetic stimulation and inhibiting recapture of noradrenaline in the neuromuscular union. However, a pupil with sympathetic palsy does not dilate and produces a pupil size difference of 1 mm. One drop should be administered in each eye, repeating 1 min. later and examined after 15 min. This test confirms the oculosympathetic injury but does not facilitate its location. – 1% hydroxyamphetamine test to release noradrenaline in the neuromuscular union, provoking dilatation if the third neuron is intact. This test enables discrimination between pre- and post-ganglionic damage. It must be carried out 48 h after the cocaine test to avoid the additive effect. One drop should be administered in each eye, repeating 1 min. later and examining the pupils 30 min. later. In cases of post-surgery complications, this syndrome generally resolves spontaneously but in this case the damage is probably irreversible due to the persistence of the condition after 2 years of follow-up.2,3,5

3

Management approach for these patients is usually conservative with expectant attitude, although in selected cases surgical treatment could be considered, for example to reinsert the aponeurosis of the elevator. A diagnostic of Horner’s syndrome must always be considered in cases involving trauma, surgery, infections or neoplasia. The clinical history is the cornerstone for diagnosis.

Conflict of interest No conflict of interests has been declared by the authors.

references

1. Ribas J, Kauffman P, De Campos E, Oliviera L, Kusniek S, Wolosker N, et al. Quality of life, before and alter thoracic sympayhectomy: report on 378 operated patients. Ann Torac Surg. 2003;76:886–91. 2. Rodriguez P, Freixenet J, Hussein M, Valencia JM, Gil R, Herrero J, et al. Side effects, complications and outcome of thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis in 406 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:514–9. 3. Baird R, Al-Balushi Z, Wackett J, Bouchard S. Iatrogenic Horner syndrome after tube thoracostomy. Pediatr Surg J. 2009;44:2012–4. 4. George A, Haydar AA, Adams WM. Imaging of Horner’s syndrome. Clinic Radiol. 2008;63:499–505. 5. Kaya SO, Tuba Liman S, Bir LS, Yuncu G, Erbay HR, Unsal S. Horner’s syndrome as a complication in thoracic surgical practice. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:1025–8.