Reperfusion Contributes to Colonic Injury Following Experimental Aortic Surgery

Reperfusion Contributes to Colonic Injury Following Experimental Aortic Surgery

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21, 35–39 (2001) doi:10.1053/ejvs.2000.1264, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Ischaemia/Reperfusion Contrib...

182KB Sizes 0 Downloads 65 Views

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21, 35–39 (2001) doi:10.1053/ejvs.2000.1264, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on

Ischaemia/Reperfusion Contributes to Colonic Injury Following Experimental Aortic Surgery P. U. Reber∗1, M. Peter1, A. G. Patel1, E. Stauffer2, G. Printzen1, D. Mettler3, H. Hakki1 and H. W. Kniemeyer1 1

Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery, 2Pathology and 3Institute for Surgical Research, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland

Objectives: ischaemia of the colon is an important complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The aim of this animal study was to investigate the effect of sequential ischaemia and reperfusion on sigmoid mucosal pO2 and its association with local ET-1 release. Material and Methods: twelve pigs underwent colonic ischaemia followed by complete reperfusion. Six other animals were sham controls. A Clark-type microcatheter was used for continuous mucosal pO2 measurements. Serial systemic and inferior mesenteric vein blood samples were obtained for determination of ET-1 concentration. Neutrophil extravasation was assessed by tissue myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. Results: arterial occlusion was associated with a gradual decrease of mucosal pO2 and local release of ET-1. After restoration of blood flow, mucosal pO2 returned to near baseline values, whereas ET-1 reached its maximum concentration during the reperfusion period. MPO activity was significantly increased. Conclusions: colonic ischaemia and reperfusion causes neutrophil extravasation and local ET-1. Key Words: Experimental; Aortic surgery; Ischaemia/Reperfusion; Colonic injury.

Introduction

Anaesthesia

Ischaemia of the colon is an important and often a fatal complication in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.1–5 Patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and hypogastric collateral flow may reduce colonic ischaemia in elective AAA repair, but not in those operated for rupture where hypotension and intraoperative blood loss strongly correlate with subsequent colonic ischaemia.6–9 The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of sequential ischaemia and reperfusion on sigmoid mucosal pO2 and subsequent ET-1 concentration in an animal model.

Eighteen fasted young pigs of either sex, weighing 25 to 35 kg, were anaesthetised with ketamine at 10 mg/kg body weight intramuscularly followed by metomidate at 5 mg/kg body weight and azaperone at 2 mg/kg body weight intravenously for endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained with 1%–2% isoflurane. The lungs were ventilated with a mixture of room air and oxygen to give 40% oxygen in the breathing air by aid of a volume-controlled ventilator with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 3–4 cm of H2O (Tiberius 19; Dra¨gerwerk, Lu¨beck, Germany). Tidal volume was maintained at 10 ml/kg body weight, and ventilatory frequency was adjusted (13–18 beats per minute) to maintain PaCo2 at 4.5–5.5 kPa. Intravenous catheters were introduced through the right cephalic vein for central venous pressure measurements, withdrawal of blood samples and thermodilution fluid injections during measurements of cardiac output (CO). A Swan-Ganz catheter was positioned in the pulmonary artery through the right external jugular vein for measurement of CO which was performed using the thermodilution method, using 5 ml bolus injections of saline solution at room

Material and Methods Experiments were performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the local Animal Ethics Committee. ∗ Please address all correspondence to: P. U. Reber, Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Lindenhofspital, 3012 Bern, Switzerland. 1078–5884/01/010035+05 $35.00/0  2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

36

P. U. Reber et al.

Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of the experimental set-up. Arterial anatomy of the pig. A=aorta, IMA=inferior mesenteric artery, VA=vascular arcade.

temperature, and the results were calculated as means of three consecutive measurements by the monitor. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse rate were monitored through a catheter placed in the left carotid artery. Heat lamps and heating blankets were used to maintain body temperature at a constant 37±0.3 °C.

Surgical procedure and experimental design The animals were anaesthetised as described above and placed in the supine position. A midline incision from the xiphisternum to the pubis was performed. The porcine colon is adherent to itself in the form of a double-spiral, but the distal part is free and accessible.10 Accordingly, the distal colonic segment was separated from the mesocolon and the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) was isolated at its origin from the aorta. Subsequently, the abdominal aorta, iliac arteries, and the marginal artery were dissected carefully to avoid vasospasms. The inferior mesenteric vein was dissected and cannulated with a 16 Ga×12″ (30 cm) polyurethane indwelling catheter with side holes (Arrow International Inc., Reading, PA) for withdrawal of local blood samples (Fig. 1). Finally, the pO2 and temperature probe were inserted in the submucosa of the sigmoid colon by means of a special needle and fixed in this position with 5-0 polydiaxonone sutures. Administration of 2000 U of heparin was performed and systemic and local baseline blood samples withdrawn. Subsequent local and systemic blood sampling was performed at 30 min intervals. All blood samples were immediately centrifuged, and the supernatant plasma frozen at −85 °C for later analysis. Six control animals were left with intact blood flow, but dissection was identical. In the 12 animals undergoing ischaemia, the IMA was occluded with a small bulldog clamp Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Vol 21, January 2001

applied to its origin. After stabilisation of the pO2 values, the aorta and iliac arteries were occluded with vascular clamps. At this moment, arterial circulation of the distal colonic segment is limited to the vascular arcades originating from the superior mesenteric artery (Arc of Riolan, marginal artery of Drummond). To produce near complete ischaemia of the distal colonic segment, the marginal artery was finally occluded by an additional bulldog clamp. After 30 min ischaemia of the sigmoid colon and stable pO2 values, the sigmoid colon was subjected to reperfusion. After 60 min of reperfusion, the animals were sacrified by administration of potassium chloride. Full thickness biopsy specimens of the distal colonic segments were obtained before and after the experiments in both animal groups. Evaluation of clinicopathologic parameters Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO) MAP and CO were continuously monitored and maintained between 60 and 70 mmHg, respectively, 4.5 and 5.5 l/min. Sigmoid mucosal oxygen tension (pO2) and temperature A flexible polarographic Clark-type microcatheter (LICOX System, GMS mbH, Kiel, Germany) was used for continuous pO2 monitoring. Mucosal pO2 values were continuously averaged over a 500 s period and adjusted to the actual tissue temperature by means of a computer (LICOX System, GMS GmbH). Tissue temperature was kept constant at 37±0.4 °C. ET-1 assays Systemic and local ET-1 plasma levels were measured with a porcine specific enzyme-linked immuno-absorbent assay (ELISA) kit (ET-1 ELISA assay kit, Sodiag SA, Losone, Switzerland). Biopsy sections were evaluated for the presence or absence of ischaemia by a pathologist blinded to the clinical circumstances from which the tissue was obtained. A grading scale was developed on the basis of previous histologic studies10 describing intestinal pathologic findings as follows: grade 0, normal mucosa; grade 1, subepithelial oedema; grade 2, desquamated superficial epithelium; grade 3, damage of the upper half of glands; grade 4, disappearance of glands. Tissue-associated MPO activity was determined by a modification of the method of Krawisz et al.12 previously described in detail.13 Statistical analysis All values are reported as means±SE. Comparisons between groups were made with the Mann–Whitney

Colonic Injury Following Aortic Surgery

37

14 *#

MPO activity (U)

12 10 8 6 4 2 0

Fig. 2. Normal histology of the colon mucosa before beginning of the experiments (HE 18×).

Baseline After I/R *p < 0.05 compared to controls; # p < 0.05 compared to baseline

Fig. 4. MPO activity in the biopsy specimen from the sigmoid colon before and after ischemia/reperfusion. (Φ) Controls.

Reperfusion #*

Endothelin-1 (mg/ml)

Ischaemia 4 3 #*

#*

Aorta

MA

Local ET1concentration

2 1

0 Baseline

Controls IMA

Reperf. Reperf. 30' 60'

*p < 0.05 compared to controls; # p < 0.05 compared to baseline

Fig. 3. Histology of the colon mucosa after the experiments showing substantial extravasation of neutrophils (HE 22×).

U-test for numerical variables and with chi-square test for qualitative variables (histology). Comparisons within variables and within groups were made with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Probabilities of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results Histopathologic study The histological grading of the colon specimen from the ischaemic animals differed significantly from the control animals (p<0.005). The changes ranged from subepithelial oedema with vascular dilatation to damage of the upper half of glands (grades 1 to 3) and were associated with a marked neutrophil infiltration (Figs 2 and 3). MPO activity after I/R was significantly

Fig. 5. Mean local concentrations of endothelin-1 (ET-1) after sequential I/R and in control animals. Abbreviations: IMA=inferior mesenteric artery, MA=marginal artery.

increased compared to baseline and the control group (Fig 4). Local endothelin-1 concentration Mean local basal ET-1 concentrations were similar between groups at baseline and not significantly different after occlusion of the IMA (Fig. 5). Subsequent aortic cross-clamping produced a significant increase in local ET-1 concentration compared to baseline and control values (p<0.05) without further increase after temporary occlusion of the marginal artery. The reperfusion period was characterised by a maximum increase in ET-1 concentration (p<0.05) only after 30 min, decreasing subsequently after 60 min to near baseline values. Systemic endothelin-1 concentration Mean systemic ET-1 concentration in the I/R group of animals did not increase significantly compared to the Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Vol 21, January 2001

38

P. U. Reber et al.

Reperfusion

Endothelin-1 (mg/ml)

Ischaemia 3.0

#*

2.5 Systemic ET1concentration

2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 Baseline

Controls IMA

Aorta

MA

Reperf. Reperf. 30' 60'

*p < 0.05 compared to controls; # p < 0.05 compared to baseline Fig. 6. Mean systemic plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 (ET-1) after sequential I/R and in control animals. Abbreviations: IMA= inferior mesenteric artery, MA=marginal artery.

Ischaemia

Reperfusion

Tissue pO2 mmHg

60 50 40

*#

30 *#

20

*#

10 0 Baseline

IMA

Aorta

MA

Reperf. Reperf. 30' 60'

*p < 0.05 compared to controls; # p < 0.05 compared to baseline Fig. 7. Mean mucosal pO2 of the distal left porcine colon during sequential I/R and in control animals. Abbreviations: IMA=inferior mesenteric artery, MA=marginal artery. (Ε) Controls.

controls and baseline except in the first 30 min of reperfusion (p<0.05) (Fig. 6).

Tissue pO2 concentration Mean basal tissue pO2 concentrations were similar between groups at baseline. Tissue pO2 concentration decreased significantly compared to the controls and baseline after sequential occlusion of the IMA, aorta and marginal artery (p<0.05). Release of the blood flow produced a rapid increase in tissue pO2 concentration to near baseline values after 30 and 60 min, respectively (Fig. 7).

Discussion There is growing evidence that multiple pathophysiological factors, such as long hypotensive Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Vol 21, January 2001

periods, preoperative shock, and extrinsic mesenteric compression from a large retroperitoneal haematoma are mainly involved in the high incidence of colon ischaemia following ruptured AAAs.4,6,14 While improper ligation of the IMA is probably an important causative factor for colonic ischaemia in patients with elective AAA operations, it plays only a minor role in case of AAA rupture.4,6 Moreover, necrosis of the distal colon has been reported to occur despite high retrograde IMA stump pressure.15 Successful resuscitation from haemorrhage shock, increasing cardiac output and finally releasing the aortic cross-clamping will induce reperfusion of the ischaemic colon, thus mimicking an ischaemia/ reperfusion (I/R) injury. To investigate some of the effects of I/R injury on the colon, we adopted an experimental porcine model. Different experimental porcine models of colonic ischaemia have been described previously.10,16,17 However, in none of these studies has reperfusion injury been investigated. It is well established that the tissue injury that follows I/R involves early interactions between the endothelial cells of the microvasculature and circulating leukocytes.13,18,19 Cell adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-1 and the 2 integrin complex CD11 and CD 18 on both neutrophils and vascular endothelial cells are upregulated, causing neutrophil adhesion and extravasation into the extravascular space, where they cause considerable tissue damage through the release of proteases including enzymes from the cascade system.18 In the current study, MPO activity in the sigmoid colon was significantly more elevated compared to the controls, reflecting a substantial concentration of activated neutrophils in the tissue. This finding may explain in part the observation by Redaelli et al.20 that the inflammation in the colon can develop as a selfperpetuation process with further damage to the bowel after I/R injury. A contributing or even more important factor for this phenomenon could be the synthesis and release of endothelin-1 (ET-1) by the intestine. ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor, synthesised by a wide variety of organs. It was claimed to be involved in the I/R injuries including cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, ischaemic renal failure, and acute graft rejection after liver transplantation.21,22 Additionally, ET-1 has been shown to induce the production of neutrophil chemotactic factors.21 Recently, Soda et al.24 have demonstrated that an increased production of ET-1 is responsible for the reduction of intestinal microcirculation and part of the subsequent intestinal tissue damage during I/R injury. Moreover, by suppressing the production and release

Colonic Injury Following Aortic Surgery

of ET-1, micro-circulation was maintained and the tissue from I/R injury protected. Accordingly, we found that local plasma ET-1 concentration continuously increased with ongoing ischaemia to reach its maximum concentration 30 min after begin of the reperfusion. A variety of methods to assess intestinal viability at operation have been described, including Doppler ultrasonography, fluorescein fluorescence patterns with ultraviolet light and pH measurement in the wall of the sigmoid colon (intramural pH).25–32 So far, the clinical value of these methods to detect ischaemia is limited. Postoperative identification of mesenteric ischaemia usually requires a high index of suspicion by the clinician. Measurement of intramural pH to detect colon ischaemia is a relatively reliable predictor of colon ischaemia. Sigmodioscopy has been also recommended.30 In conclusion, experimental porcine colon ischaemia followed by a reperfusion period caused significant neutrophil activation and extravasation as well as a significant local ET-1 release. Ischaemia and reperfusion of the colon can be reliably and accurately assessed by measuring tissue-pO2 concentration with a Clark type indwelling electrode.

Acknowledgements This study is dedicated to Professor Berhard Nachbur.

References 1 Schroeder T, Christoffersen JK, Andersen J et al. Ischemic colitis complicating reconstruction of the abdominal aorta. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985; 160: 299–303. 2 Longo WE, Lee TC, Barnett MG et al. Ischemic colitis complicating abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the U.S. Veteran. J Surg Res 1996; 60: 351–354. 3 Bast TJ, van der Biezen JJ, Scherpenisse J, Eikelboom BC. Ischaemic disease of the colon and rectum after surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective study of the incidence and risk factors. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990; 4: 253–257. 4 Meissner MH, Johansen K. Colon infarction after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 979–985. 5 Bjo¨ rk M, Bergquist D, Troeng T. Incidence and clinical presentation of bowel ischemia after aortoiliac surgery: 2930 operations from a population-based registry in Sweden. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12: 139–144. 6 Piotrowski JJ, Ripepi AJ, Yuhas JP, Alexander JJ, Brandt CP. Colonic ischemia: the achilles heel of ruptured aortic aneurysm repair. Am Surg 1996; 62: 557–561. 7 Zelenock GB, Strodel WE, Knol JA et al. A prospective study of clinically and endoscopically documented colonic ischemia in 100 patients undergoing aortic reconstructive surgery with aggressive colonic and direct pelvic revascularization, compared with historic controls. Surgery 1989; 106: 771–780. 8 Kim MW, Hundahl SA, Collin RD et al. Ischemic colitis after aortic aneurysmectomy. Am J Surg 1983; 145: 392–394.

39

9 Ja¨ rvinen O, Laurikka J, Salenius JP, Lepa¨ ntalo M. Mesenteric infarction after aorto-iliac surgery on the basis of 1752 operations from the national vascular registry. World J Surg 1999; 23: 243–247. 10 Bjo¨ rck M, Bergqvist D, Rasmussen I, Piehl E, Haglund U. An experimental porcine model of partial ischaemia of the distal colon. Eur J Surg 1997; 163: 843–850. 11 Montgomery A, Hartmann M, Jo¨ nsson K, Haglund U. Intramucosal pH measurement with tonometers for detecting gastrointestinal ischemia in porcine hemorrhagic shock. Circ Shock 1989; 29: 319–327. 12 Krawisz JE, Sharon P, Stenson WF. Quantitative assay for acute intestinal inflammation based on myeloperoxidase activity. Assessment of inflammation in rat and hamster models. Gastroenterology 1984; 87: 1344–1350. 13 Reber PU, Lewis MPN, Patel AG et al. Ethanol-mediated neutrophil extravasation in feline pancreas. Dig Dis Sci 1998; 43: 2610– 2615. 14 Levison JA, Halpern V, Kline RG, Faust GR, Cohen JR. Perioperative predictors of colonic ischemia after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29: 40–47. 15 Lie M, Norman E, Ovrum E. Necrosis of the distal colon after abdominal aneurysmectomy despite high retrograde pressure in inferior mesenteric artery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1992; 71: 347–348. 16 Bailey RW, Hamilton SR, Morris JB, Bulkley GB, Smith GW. Pathogenesis of nonocclusive ischemic colitis. Ann Surg 1986; 203: 590–599. 17 Krogh-Sorensen K, Pal-Dag L, Kvernbo K. Laser Doppler Flux and tissue oxygen tension as indicators of colonic perfusion in pigs. Eur J Surg 1993; 159: 293–299. 18 Kurtel H, Tso P, Granger DN. Granulocyte accumulation in post-ischemic intestine: role of leukocyte adhesion glycoprotein CD11/CD18. Am J Physiol 1992; 262: G878–G882. 19 Welbourne CRB, Goldman G, Paterson IS et al. Pathophysiology of ischemia reperfusion injury: central role of the neutrophil. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 651–655. 20 Redaelli CA, Schilling MK, Carrell TP. Intraoperative assessment of intestinal viability by laser doppler flowmetry for surgery of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. World J Surg 1998; 22: 283–289. 21 Stansby G, Fuller B, Jeremy J, Cheetham K, Rolles K. Endothelin release: a facet of reperfusion injury in clinical liver transplantation. Transplantation 1993; 56: 239–240. 22 Shibouta Y, Suzuki N, Shino A et al. Pathophysiological role of endothelin in acute renal failure. Life Sci 1990; 46: 1611–1618. 23 Hofman FM, Chen R, Jeyaseelan R et al. Endothelin-1 induces production of the neutrophil chemotactic factor Interleukin-8 by human brain-derived endothelial cells. Blood 1998; 92: 3064–3072. 24 Soda Y, Nazmy El Assal O, Liqun Y, Nagasue N. Suppressed endothelin-1 production by FK 506 and cyclosporin A in ischemia/reperfusion of rat small intestine. Surgery 1999; 125: 23–32. 25 Bulkley GB, Zuidema GD, Hamilton SR et al. Intraoperative determination of small intestinal viability following ischemic injury: a prospective, controlled trial of two adjuvant methods (Doppler and fluorescein) compared with standard clinical judgement. Ann Surg 1981; 193: 628–635. 26 Horgan PG, Gorey TF. Operative assessment of intestinal viability. Surg Clin North Am 1992; 72: 143–155. 27 Kuttila K, Perttila¨ J, Va¨ ntinnen E, Niinikoski J. Tonometric assessment of sigmoid perfusion during aortobifemoral reconstruction for atherosclerosis. Eur J Surg 1994; 160: 491–495. 28 Fiddian-Green RG, Amelin PM, Herrmann JB et al. Prediction of the development of sigmoid ischemia on the day of aortic operations. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 654–660. 29 Schiedler MG, Cutler BS, Fiddian-Green RG. Sigmoid intramural pH for prediction of ischemic colitis during aortic surgery. Arch Surg 1987; 122: 881–886. 30 Kurland B, Brandt LJ, Delany HM. Diagnostic tests for intestinal ischemia. Surg Clin North Am 1992; 72: 85–105. 31 Sheridan WG, Lowndes RH, Young HL. Intraoperative tissue oxymetry in the human gastrointestinal tract. Am J Surg 1990; 159: 314–319. 32 Locke R, Hauser CJ, Shoemaker WC. The use of surface oximetry to assess bowel viability. Arch Surg 1984; 119: 1252–1256. Accepted 11 November 2000

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Vol 21, January 2001