Vol. 121, No. 1, 1984 May 31, 1984
BIOCHEMICAL
Isolation
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 380-385
and Regional Localization by j,~ &t--u Hybridization of a Unique Gene Segment to Chromosome21
Evelyn A. Devine', Sarah L. Nolin I, George E. Houck, Jr.', EdmundC. Jenkins', David L. Miller' and W. Ted Brown' 1Departments of HumanGenetics and 2Molecular Biology, New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1050 Forest Hill Road, Staten Island, NY 10314 Received April
9, 1984
A chromosome21 (ch. 21) flow-sorted library was screened for the presence of unique DNA segments which are specific for the 21st chromosome. By combining the techniques of somatic cell genetics and j& z&& hybridization, we have identified several of these recombinant probes and have regionally mapped one of them to the distal half of the long .arm of This represents the first report of chromosome21 (q22.1->qter). the sublocalization of a unique DNA segment to chromosome21 by ti & hybridization. SUMMARY:
Down Syndrome (DS) is a chromosomal disorder caused by the presence of an extra copy of all
or part (21q22->qter)
of ch. 21
To date, accurate diagnosis of DS can only be made by
(1,2).
chromosomal analysis,
a time consuming and expensive process.
Since the incidence of DS in the general population
is fairly
high, - 1 in 1000 live
of a more
efficient
births
(l),
the availability
assay would be both advantageous and economical.
Recombinant DNA techniques have allowed the identification isolation
and
of unique DNAsegments which can be mappedto
chromosomal regions by Southern blot analysis using somatic cell hybrids
and in gj&
hybridization.
Several of these unique
segments have been used to quantitate
chromosomedosage and would
be useful in the diagnosis of aneuploid conditions We have identified tentatively Abbreviations: 0006-291X/84 Copyright All rights
(3,4).
a series of unique probes which have been
assigned to humanch. 21 by Southern blot DS, DownSyndrome; ch., chromosome.
$1.50
0 1984 by Academic Press, Inc. of reproduction in any form reserved.
380
analysis of
Vol.
121,
No.
1, 1984
DNA from
BIOCHEMICAL
normal
diploid
mouse-human hybrid assignment confirmed
only
of one of these situ
BIOPHYSICAL
fibroblasts,
whose
by in
AND
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
mouse fibroblasts
human ch. is
probes
21 (WA17d).
(DS21Dl)
hybridization
and a
to
ch. 21 has
and regionally
The been
mapped to
21q22.1->qter.
-IALS
AND METHODS
Cell Lines: Total genomic DNA was prepared as described (5) from normal diploid cell lines, the mouse-human somatic cell hybrid WA17 (6) and from the murine parent of the hybrid cell line, Ag. Isolation of DNA Probm An EcoRI-generated chromosome21 flow-sorted 1fPrary (7) was screened with nick-translated total human DNA (10 cpm/ugm) by the Benton-Davis technique (8) to identify ch. 21 specific sequences which lacked repetitive DNA. The sequences were then hybridized to Southern blots (9) containing 20 mcg each of total human, WA17and A9 DNAto confirm that they contained unique humanDNA. Jn situ Hvbridi&&ion and Autoradioaranhv: The hybridization protocol of Harper and Saunders (10) as modified by Zabel et al. (11) was used. Slides were stained immediately after developing using the method of Zabel et al. (11). The chromosomespreads were analyzed microscopically and grain locations were indicated on a chromosomeidiogram (12).
Isolation
of aniaue
DNASegment: Of the 5,000 recombinant phage
examined, approximately labelled
total
170 (3.4%) showed no hybridization
humanDNAand were selected for a second screen.
Several of these were chosen randomly, amplified restricted
with
EcoRI, blotted
sequences by hybridization approximately
to
individually,
and rescreened for
against total
repetitive
humanDNA.
Of these
70% did not show any homology to repetitive
DNA. In the final and hybridized
screen, the
human
recombinant clones were labelled
to Southern blots containing
20 mcg each of total
human, WA17and A9 DNA. Clones which showed unique bands after hybridization tentatively
and autoradiography assigned to ch. 21.
to total The first
DS21D1, carried
a 7.0 kb insert
characterization
by in situ hybridization.
humanand WA17DNAwere probe to be identified,
and was chosen for
381
further
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 121, No. 1, 1984 Jn situ
Hybridizam.
hybridized normal from
overnight 46,Xx,
The major
shown
in
grains of label,
the
to metaphase The
spreads
site
are
metaphase
spread spread
approximately
19
7%
20
clone,
chromosome composite
Fig.
were
was
preparations
in the
was the in
DS21D1,
from
hybridization
illustrated
of hybridization
per metaphase
FIGURE 1:
recombinant
individual.
80 metaphase
1.
The
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
2.
observed
results
idiogram
long
in Fig.
arm of ch.
On the
average,
to the
long
21 as 5.9
and of the total
was localized
amount
arm of 21.
3
4
5
6
15
16
17
18
21
22
Idiogram of high resolution Obanded mid-metaphaee chromosomes showing the composite hybridization data of recombinant probe DSZlDl from 80 metaphase spreads. As is shown, the major area of hybridization is to the long arm of ch.21. Over 53% of the label on this chromosome hybridizes
to q22.1->qter.
382
a
Vol. 121, No. 1, 1984
FIGURE2:
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
U u hybridization of probe DSElDl to a G-banded human metaphase spread. The major area of hybridization to the terminus of ch. 21 is indicated by an arrow.
Of the grains visualized 2lq22.1 ->qter
on ch.
21,
535 were localized
to the
region of the chromosome. In addition,
metaphase spreads which contained a labelled
ch. 21 were examined
in order to obtain more precise mapping data. these grains were also localized
30 more
The majority
to the region q22.1->qter.
of Probe
DS21Dl also appeared to have somehomoiogy to the centromere of ch. 15. However, over 50% of the grains which localized
to this
region were obtained from one of the three slides used in analysis; labelled
whereas the ch. 21 region q22.1->qter on all
of the slides.
These le u
the
was consistently
results
corroborate
the assignment of DS21Dl to chromosome21 and have delineated the mapping
to
q22.1->qter.
383
Vol. 121, No. 1, 1984
In
BIOCHEMICAL
situ
hybridization
be a powerful
of unique
method
We have
genome .
for
screened
precise
a ch.
21 library
of unique
gene fragments
to oh.
21 on the
basis
the
arm
using
q22.1->qter,
The homology
ti
for
the morphological hybridization
are
Southern
blots,
the
Southern
blot
genomic
located
concentrated had
in
the
Alternatively, some degree
may allow
area
probe
order
chromosome,
the
the is&J&
Since
present the
this
techniques. 384
in
unique
probe
DNA families If
be are
the probe
this
could
of oh.
on ch.
15.
21 which
had
on 15.
b is
in a trisomic diagnosis
used to
centromere
a gene
than
may or may not
DNA element,
encode
first
this
which
to the
of
homology
of DNA (13).
to a pseudogene
to be the
more
repetitive
repetitive
could
conditions
conditions
that
regions
to preserve
experiments
stringency
indicating
of
background
in
for
hybridization
for
the
may represent
many low
to a low
is
some evidence
DNA segments
the centromeric
this
regionally
showed
we observed
other
of homology
uhich
the
the
DS21D1,
21 DNA segment.
chromosome DS21Dl
stringent
Second,
the
We believe unique
of
apparent
to total
has been
First,
hybridization,
some homology
explain
integrity
21.
a
assigned
to
this
reasons.
for
human
identified
specifically
15 also
several
DNA with
on ch.
oh.
By lonering
has some affinity
the
patterns
DS21D1,
21,
We believe
less
for
and have
hybridization
ch.
along
to
hybridization.
of
DS21Dl.
hybridization
total
u
centromere to
of
has proved
we have tentatively
One of these,
long
segments mapping
which
of their
human and kTAl7 DNA. to
gene
their
series
mapped
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of
&.Q also
localization the
amount DS using
area
of a of
the
in DS, the recombinant
probe
Vol. 121, No. 1, 1984
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
-NT We thank Doctors Krumlauf and Young for kindly their
ch. 21 flow-sorted
Massari
for helpful
library,
providing
Doctors Nick Robakis
us with and Ron
discussions and Marie Cappola for preparation
of the manuscript.
1.
2. 3. 4. 5.
de la Cruz, F.F. and Gerald, P.S. (1981) Trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome) pp. 3-67, University Park Press, Baltimore. Jenkins, E.C., Duncan, C.J., Wright, C.E., Giordano, F.M., Wilbur, L., Wisniewski, K., Sklower, S.L., French, J.H., Jones, C., and Brown, W.T. (1983) Clin. Genet. 2&, 97-102. Junien, C., Huerre, C., and Rethore, M.-O. (1983) Amer. J. Hum. Genet. 35, 584-591. Camerino, G., Grzeschik, K.H., Jaye, M., DeLaSalle, H., Tolstoshev, P., Lecocq, P., Heilig, R., and Wandel, J.L. (1984) Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. 81, 498-502. Blin, N. and Stafford, D.W. (1976) Nucleic Acids Res. 3, 2303-2310.
6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Dutkowski, R.T., Brown, W.T., and Darlington, G.J. (1984) In Vitro, submitted. Krumlauf, R., J8anpierre, M., and Young, B. (1982) Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. B, 2971-2975. Benton, W.D., and Davis, R.W. (1977) Science 1pd, 180-182. Southern, E.M. (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 98, 503-517. Harper, M.E., and Saunders, G.F. (1982) Chromosoma 83, 431-439.
11.
12. 13.
Zabel, B.U., Naylor, S.L,, Sakaguchi, A.Y., Bell, G.I., and Shows, T.B. (1983) Proc. Nat’l. Acad. Sci. Bp, 6932-6936. Yunis, J.J., Sawyer, J.R., and Ball, D.W. (1978) Cytog. Cell. Genet. 22, 679-683. Manuelidis, L. (1978) Chromosoma 44, 23-32.
385