BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol.55,No.3,1973
ISOLATION OF A MAJOR HYDROPHOBIC PROTEIN OF THE MITOCHONDRIAL INNER MEMBRANE Roderick
A. Capaldif,
Hirochika
Komai and Douglas R. Hunter
Institute for Enzyme Research University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Received
October
5,1973
SUMMARY: A protein of molecular weight 29,000 has been isolated from the mltochondrial inner membrane. It is a major component of Racker's hydrophobic protein mixture and is also rather selectively released from the inner membrane by lysolecithin treatment. Data indicate that the 29,000 component may be as much as 10% of the total protein of the inner membrane.
INTRODUCTION The mitochondrial ponents. four
inner
These are for
electron
oligomycin
complexes sensitive
Complexes I (5),
the most part isolated
II
(5,6),
to almost
five
complexes:
(5,7)
The polypeptide
and IV (8-10)
ATPase (11,12)
all
into
number of protein
by Green and his collaborators
III
sensitive
a large
organized
ATPase complex (3,4).
chain and oligomycin are referrable
membrane contains
of the electron
have been identified.
These
the major bands seen in sodium dodecyl
found in significant
component.
29,000 is not however We have succeeded
Its method of preparation
in this
sulfate
One major com-
in isolating
is detailed
of
transfer
ponent of molecular
complexes.
and the
compositions
(ETP) (5).
in any of these
the
(1,2)
polyacyl amide gels of inner membrane preparation weight
com-
amounts
and purifying
this
paper.
MATERIALS AND METHODS ETP were prepared
They were treated
'Present
address:
Eugene, Oregon
according
with lysolecithin
Institute
to the method of Linnane and Ziegler as described
of Molecular
97403.
Copyright 0 1973 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
655
Biology,
by Komai --et al.
University
(13).
(14).
of Oregon,
The
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol.55,No.3,1973
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Mobility
Figure-l. Densitometric traces of various fractions derived from the mitochondnal inner membrane, run on 10% polyacylamide gels in the presence of 1% SDS and 5 mM B-mercaptothanol. Trace a, ETP; Trace b, Racker's hydrophobic mixture; Trace c, the supernatant S2 from lysolecithin treated ETP; Trace d, pure 29,000 component after chromatography through Biogel A-5 M in 1% SDS and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol. A number of bands are identified by size as follows: 65000, NADH dehydrogenase; 55000 and 52000, the major subunits of Fl; 50000, core protein of Complex III; 48000, one of the b cytochromes of Complex III. supernatant fraction
S2 was rich was prepared
The 29,000 lysolecithin the above
as described
molecular
treatment fractions
in the 29,000
weight or from
(5-10
mg/ml)
component
(15).
The hydrophobic
by Kagawa and Racker protein
the
was further
hydrophobic
were
fraction
made 5 mM with
656
protein
(16).
purified
from
as follows: respect
S2 of the 5 ml of
to dithiothreitol
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol.55,No.3,1973
and then
were
reagent.
This
at 105,000 sulphate for
brought solution
x g for
respect
was incubated
120 min.
to urea
on ice
by addition
for
was resuspended
(SDS) and 5 mM B-mercaptoethanol
and dissolved
This
Laboratories,
solution
Inc.)
monitored
for
by dialysis
in 1% SDS and 0.5
absorbance against
48 hours.
was chromatographed
concentrated
at 280 nm.
a large
Ethanol
volume
was removed
and the gels
--et al.
were
(17).
fixed
in
Protein
concentration
Polyacrylamide
and stained
Biogel-A-5
gel
to 1OO'C M (Bio-rad
from
were
the purified
the cold
room
and the
protein
protein (4'C)
for
was
was estimated
by the
electrophoresis
as described
dodecyl
Fractions
SDS was removed
evaporation
centrifuged
by heating
dithiothreitol.
of 90% ethanol
solid
in 3% sodium
through
by rotary
by freeze-drying.
of Lowry
ti
of the
30 min and then
The pellet
1 min.
method
to 8 M with
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
was performed
by Fairbanks
--et al.
(18).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A typical sulphate
and run
Band number component gels
densitometric
14 is
the
(trace mixture,
It
dalton
Figure
is
inner also
1 (trace
precipitated
threitol,
Figure
the yield
of highly
shown
a). This
by its
bovine
serum albumin,
ovalbumin,
and cytochrome
5.
the major
component
preparations,
component
1 (trace
as estimated
ribonuclease
membrane
in Figure
dodecyl
in the preparation.
proteins
lysolecithin
contaminating chromatography
in 1% sodium
in supernatant
as shown
of Racker's
migration
S2 of
in Figure
hydrophobic
on
1 protein
b).
8 M urea,
column
is
the major
of the
of other
standard
protein
Treatment with
of 29,000
chymotrypsinogen,
treated
c).
the
is
polypeptide
weight
with
dehydrogenase,
lysolecithin
gels
predominating
has a molecular
The 29,000
of ETP solubilized
on 10% polyacrylamide
in comparison
lactic
trace
supernatant
the
29,000
proteins. through
1 (trace purified
d).
molecular
Purification Biogel Using protein
or hydrophobic
A-5 m in the
weight
protein
to homogeneity
fraction
fairly
free
was achieved
1% SDS and 0.5 mM dithio-
lysolecithin
method
was 5-8% of the starting
657
protein
of preparation, inner
membrane
by
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 55, No. 3,1973
preparation,
even after
is a major
component
The fact
that
a lipoprotein
by the
fraction,
the
while in
mitochondrial
is
then,
obscure portion
are
from
component
that
protein
therefore
membrane.
it
outl'
is
concentration.
distributed
This along
and solubilized
contention with
is
a large
amount
left
after
of this
mg/mg protein,
cf.
we have isolated membrane
with It
0.5-0.6
a major
intrinsic
a molecular
weight
hydrophobic
required
for
electron
transport
however,
protein
reconstitution
Its that
fraction,
ETP).
of the
of 29,000.
may be significant,
is in
protein
of protein
fraction
mg/mg protein
the
function protein
a mixture
of oxidative
of
supported
of the hydrophobic
removal
as
in an area
in the preparation
of Racker's
which
This
"scooped
is solubilized
at present.
proteins the
lipid
protein
(0.3
inner
a major
suggests
the precipitate
lipid
inner
selectively
1.5 mg/mg protein)
In sumnary
remains
rather
a high
that
(about
depleted
is
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
described.
of the mitochondrial it
with
fact
lipid
the manipulations
by lysolecithin,
the membrane
AND BIOPHYSICAL
of
phosphorylation
and ATP synthesizing
complexes
(19).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful ment of this work. National Institute
to Dr. David E. Green for his interest This work was funded in part by grant of General Medical Science (USPHS).
in and encourageGM-12847 from the
REFERENCES 1.
Hatefi, Y., Haavik, A.G., Res. Cotnnun. 4, 441.
2.
Green, D.E., and Fleischer, S. (1962) in Horizons in Biochemistry, M. Kasha and B. Pullman, eds. AcademicPress, New York, p. 381.
3.
Tzagoloff, 243, 2405.
4.
Kagawa,
5.
Capaldi, R.A. in Mammalian Cell D.M. Robinson,Tds. Butterworth
A.,
Y.,
Y.
Byington,
K.H.,
and Racker,
6.
Hatefi,
7.
Baum, H., Silman, Chem. 242, 4876.
Ann.
8.
Capaldi,
9.
Kuboyama,
R.A., M.,
and Griffiths,
N.Y.
Acad.
F.C.,
J. Biol. Membranes, and Co.,
Sci.,
Rieske,
and Hayashi, Fong,
and MacLennan,
E. (1966)
H.I.,
D.E.
(1961)
D.H.
Biochem.
(1968)
Chem. 241,
Biophys.
J. Biol.
Chem.
2467.
Vol. II, G.A. Jamieson London, in press.
and
in press. J.S.,
and Lipton,
H. (1972) and King,
FEBS Letters T.E.
658
(1972)
S.H. 2&, J. Biol.
(1967)
J. Biol.
261. Chem. 247,
6375.
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 55, No. 3,1973
10.
Mason, T., Ebner, E., Poyton, R., Salsgaber, J., Wharton, D.C., Mennucci, L., and Schatz, G. (1972) in Mitochondria/Biomembranes, Vol. 28, S.G. Van der Bergh, P. Borst, L.L.M.van Deenen, J,.C. Riemersma! E.C. Slater, and J.M. Tager, eds. North Holland/American Elsevier, p. 53.
11.
Capaldi,
12.
Tzagoloff, A., Rubin, Acta 301, 71.
13.
Linnane,
14.
Komai, H., Hunter, Cotmnun. 53, 82.
15.
Komai, H. (1974) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 277, in press.
16.
Kagawa, Y., and Racker,
17.
Lowry, O.H., Rosenbrough, J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265.
18.
Fairbanks, 2602.
19.
Racker,
R.A.
(1973) Biochem. Biophys. M.S.,
A.W., and Ziegler, D.R.,
G., Steck,
and Sierra,
M.E. (1973) Biochim.
D.M. (1957) and Takahashi,
E. (7977)
L.T.,
E., and Kandrach,
Res. Conznun. 53, 1331.
N.J.,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta &, 120. Y. (1973) Biochem. Biophys. Res.
J. Biol. Fart-,
Chem. 246, 5477.
A.L.,
and Wallach, A. (1971)
and Randall,
D.F.H.
J. Biol.
659
Biophys.
(1971)
R.J.
(1951)
Biochemistry
Chem. 246, 7069.
lo,