Isomeric morpholine derivatives of ga -sulfanuric chloride

Isomeric morpholine derivatives of ga -sulfanuric chloride

IHORG. HUCL. CHEM. LETTERS. ISOMERIC V°l. 2, MORPHOLINE I~. 165-168, 1966. Pergamon Pre=s Ltd. Printed In Great Britain. ~ERIVATIVES (F...

155KB Sizes 0 Downloads 39 Views

IHORG.

HUCL.

CHEM.

LETTERS.

ISOMERIC

V°l. 2,

MORPHOLINE

I~. 165-168,

1966.

Pergamon Pre=s

Ltd.

Printed

In

Great

Britain.

~ERIVATIVES (F ~_-SULFANURIC CHLORIE~

Amedeo Failli, Marlene A. Kresge, Christopher W. Allen, and Therald Moeller Noyes Chemical Laboratory, University of Illinois~ Urbane, Illinois, U.S.A.

(Received 7/day •966) The well-kno~rn s o l v o ] ~ i c

substitution

reactions

of the tr~eric

phospho-

nitrilic halides, (NPX2)s, suggest that parallel behavior may be expected with the isoelectronic sulfanuric halides, (NSGX) S.

However, preliminary studies

involving ~_-sulfanuric chloride, the most readily accessible of the trimeric sulfanuric halides, indicate either solvolysis by ammonia followed by polymerization to yield melam and melem analogs (1) or ring cleavage with morphollne to form N_~N'-dlmorpholidosulfamide (2), but give no evidences for the formation of readily isolable substitution products. We have now established that under controlled conditions morphollne can react with ~_-sulfanuric chloride without ring cleavage and with the formation of colorless, crystalline trimorpholido derivatives,

with benzene as solvent

and a sufficient excess of morpholine present to function as a hydrogen chloride acceptor, a trlmorpholido compound (I), melting at 171-172@C. (uncorr.) after recrystallization from acetonitrile and absolute ethanol, was obtained in 40-50% initial yield.

With benzene as solvent and a sufficient quantity of

trlethylamine present to serve as a preferential hydrogen chloride acceptor, a mixed product (melting point 160-162°C. ) was obtained in 45-54% initial yield. From this mixture, a second trimorpholido compound (I_~I), melting at 196-197@C. (uncorr.), was separated from I by recrystallization from absolute ethanol in 3~-49% overall yield.

With acetonitrile as solvent and excess morphollne pres-

ent, compound I_IIwas obtained in ca. 56% overall yield.

Each reaction was car-

ried out by adding a solution of ~_-sulfanuric chloride (2) in theappropriate solvent dropwise over a period of 1-1.5 hrs. to a well-stirred and externally

165

166

ISOMERIC MORPHOLINE DERIVATIVES

Vol. 2, No. 6

cooled (by ice-water) solution of morpholine (or morpholine plus triethylamine) in the same solvent, the entire reaction system being protected from moisture. The reaction mixture was then allowed to warm to room temperature, an additional 5-7 hrs., and permitted to stand for ca. 20 hrs. tated amine hydrochloride and solvent ~ r e and evaporation in vacuo.

stirred for

The precipi-

removed, respectively, by filtration

The oily residues ~ r e

rendered crystalline by

treatment with absolute ethanol and the products ultimately separated and purified by crystallization. Ana__~l. Calcd. for CIeHa4OeNeSs:

C, 32.41; H, 5.44; N, 18.90; S, 21.63; Mol. wt., 444.6.

Found for I (m.p., 171-172°C.):

C, 32.37; H, 5.89; N, 18.93; S, 21.86; Mol. wt., 403.*

Found for I_!I (m.p., 196-197°C. ):

C, 32.58; H, 5.47; N, 18.38; S, 21.76; Mol. wt., 438.**

Neither _I nor I I is extensively soluble in acetone, dioxane, diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, ethanol or acetonitrile.

nitrobenzene,

or pyridine.

Each dissolves in absolute

Compound I is soluble in water but not in anhydrous

benzene; compound I I is soluble in anhydrous benzene but n ~ in water.

The

infrared spectra, as recorded for benzene solutions (II only) or potassium bromide disks with a Perkin-Elmer Model 21 double-beam instrument using sodium chloride optics, of the two compounds are similar (Table 1), as are those of ~- and ~-sulfanuric chlorides (2).

The large number of morpholine bands pre-

vents absolute identification of the S=O stretching frequency, which appears con~uonly in the ]250-1300 cm.-i region (3)-

The bands around 1075 era.-i in-

dicate S-N ring vibrations, as noted at lllO cm.-i for ~-sulfanuric chloride (2) and at llOO-1200 cm. -i for "cis" trimeric sulfanuric fluoride and its derivatives (4).

Decrease in frequency parallels weakening of the S-N bond by

decreasing polarization of the sulfur atoms by the exocyelic groups. * Cryoscopically in camphor.

** Osmometrically in benzene.

The

Vol. 2, No. 6

ISOMERIC MORPHOLIHE DERIVATIVES

167

TABLE 1 Infrared Spectra of Trimorpholido Derivatives

Compound

Frequency,

I

3130(m)* 2980(m) 2860(m) 2480(w)

1325(sh) 1305(sh) iR92(m)

ll08(s) 1075(s) 1055(s) lO16(w)

897(w ) 873(m) 855(w) 814(m)

1455(m)

~58(sh) IP42(s) 1228(s) i196(s)

985(s) 943(s)

767(m) 750(m) 715(s)

ll05(s) 1075(s) lO15(w)

870(w) 851(m) 826(s)

1355(w) 2970(w) 2860(w)

I_!

om.-1

1332(w) 1295(m)

1455(m) 1275(sh) 1258(s) 1216(w)

1395(w) 1355(w)

* w, weak; m, medium;

800(sh) 967(m) 942(s) 915(sh)

762(w) 750(v) 723(s) 700(sh)

s, strong; sh, shoulder.

strong bands at 942-948 cm. -~ are probably assignable to exocyclic S-N vibrations since they are absent in the spectra of the halides.

The complexity of

the S-N spectra in the 715-767 cm. -~ region (3) is probably a consequence of the presence of both exo- and endocyclic S-N bonds.

The x-ray diffraction

data, as obtained for pounders with a Hayes camera of 139.3-cm. CuK~ radiation,

diameter and

show that I and I I are closely related but definitely differ-

ent c ryst allographi c ally. It is impossible,

on the basis of the data recorded, to assign a defini-

tive configuration to either isomer.

The s~m~larities between the infrared

spectra, particularly in the light of those already obtained (2~4), suggest differences

in the orientation of substituents

than differences

on the sulfanuric ring rather

in the conformation of the ring itself.

not inconsistent with this possibility,

The x-ray data are

nor is the fact that compound I

168

ISOMERIC MORPHOLINE DERIVATIVES

Vol. 2, No. 6

TABLE R Interplanar Spacings (d) in Angstroms

Ccc~ound _I 1,80(vw)* 1.85(vw) 1.93(vw) 2.G2(w) 2.15(w) 2.24(w) 2.30(w) 2.43(w) 2.54(w) 2.66(w)

2.76(w) 2.83(w) 2.89(w) 2.95(vw) 3.13(m) 3.39(s) 3.60(w) 3, 80(m) 4.05(w) 4.24(vs)

Compound I__II 4.37(m) 4.81(vs) 5.O7(w) 5.61(m) 6.18(m) 6.83(vs) 8.60(m) 12.35(w)

1.86(v~) 1.93(w) 2.00(vw) 2.09(w) 2.15(vw) 2.20(m) 2.27(w) 2.34(m) 2.43(m) 2.59(m)

2.71(w) 2.88(vw) 3.04(m) 3.26(m) 3.47(m) 3.62(.w) 3.74(w) 3.88(m) 4.O5(m) 4.39(s)

4.76(s) 5.06(w) 5.25(m) 5.40(m) 5.68(vw) 5.81(w) 6.05(m) 6.91(m) 7.42(vs) 8.38(w) 9.79(w)

vw, very ~ak; w, weak; m, medium; s, strong; vs, very strong. results under much less polar conditions than does compound I I.

Detailed

crystal structure evaluation of the two products is in order. Acknowledgment. -- This investigation was supported by Army Research Office Grants ~-124-ARO(D)-35 and USDA-AR0(D)-31-124-GT19. REFERENCES i.

M. BECKE-GOEHRING, Developments in Inorganic Polymer Chemistry, M. F. Lappert and G. J. Lelgh, Eds., p. ll6.

Elsevier, New York (1962).

2.

A. VANDI, T. MOELLER, AND T. L. BROWN, Inorg. Chem. 2, 899 (1956).

3.

K. C. SCHREIBER, Anal. Chem. 21, 1168 (1949).

4.

T. MOETT~ and A. OUCHI, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. (in press).