257
Applied Catalysis, 25 (1986) 257-264 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
ISOSTRUCTURAL
ANTIMONATES
IN OLEFIN OXIDATIVE DEHYDRO-
GENATION. G.I.Straguzzi,
K.B.Bischoff,
Center for Catalytic Engineering,
Science
University
T.A.Koch and G.C.A.Schuit and Technology,
of Delaware.
Dept.
Newark,
of Chemical
Del. 19716.
U.S.A.
ABSTRACT. Compounds with the rutile or trirutile structure and the composition MSb04 or MSbz06, were investigated as catalysts for the oxidative &hydrogenation of i-&me and the oxidation of CO; their activities were compared to those of Sb204 and Fe203. The reagentswere studied separately but also as mixtures. Sb204, Al- and CrSb04 were hardly active.The Fe-r-utile was fairly active and also selective for the oxidation of butene to butadiene; its selectivity increased by an impregnation with Sb203 but at the cost of a loss .in activity. The trirutile, CoSb206, was active but unselective. For all catalysts, except RhSbO.+, the oxidation of CO was inhibited in the presence of butene. RhSbO, was very active for both reactions but entirely unselective for the butene oxidation; the presence of butene did not inhibit its CO oxidation. These results are discussed in terms of the ensemble theory with its parameters “ensemble size” and ” electronic factor”. We suggest that two reactions with different mechanims are involved, INTRODUCTION Catalysts
for
the
selective
oxidation
of hydrocarbons
are
binary oxides such as Bi2M03012 or FeSbO., for the special oxidation cation are
of olefins.
and the other
generally
hydrocarbon consists
Of the two cations, a cation
believed withdraws
in a reoxidation
from
to proceed
usually
case of the
one is often a transition
group VE3. The oxidation in two
steps.
oxygen atoms from the catalyst, of the reduced catalyst
In the
metal
reactions first,
the
while the second
by molecular
oxygen
258
(Mars
- van Krevelen
different
a sequence
selectivity
of
encountered selective
two
in
locally
their
metal
than single
reaction
different
reactions
St.&a-S
may
will present
number
differ
selective.
the average
by inert
improve model
Limiting
metals
the catalyst’s is rarely
the
is not common.
exclusive,
we planned to investigate
In alloy
Since
a simple
were
selected
for
this
purpose.
In one,
such
as
A1Sb04,
CrSb04,
oxidations transition
were
of butene
to be investigated
possible
models.
as to their
and of CO, to ascertain
and
the sequential where the
to be mutually
oxidation
Two lines
FeSb04,
non-
part of the
catalysis,
catalysts
of
metal
reactions
catalysis,
metal cation at the same bulk structure.
Ws to be impregnated
Single
by covering
catalytic
of the two competing
CoSb,O,(trirutile)
to need
sized ensembles
the two seem
the viewpoint
,
explained
ensembles
of sites.
to oxidation
from
structure
is often
more
they will be intrinsically
restrict
model
are
sites;
size
ensemble
phenomena
of contiguous
ensemble
contrary
often
frequently
for differently
the
are
is supposed
reactions;
selectivity.
considered,
effect
in the number
shall
oxides
are
the
with
Each reaction
many possibilities of different
should then
connected
Similar
this
that
However,
binary
alloys
and where
that allow catalysis
surface
where
theory”.
with a typical
also
components,
metals
with help of the “ensemble an ensemble
seems
of two
suggests
process
reactions.
cations;
catalysis,
presence
cations
the overall
separated
of different
than
The
and of two different
overall
presence
selective
mechanism).
its own reaction;
of the
simultaneous more
redox
types of reactions
each cation catalyzes be
or
with
reaction of attack
the
rutile
RhSbO4
and
activity
for the
influence
of the
In the other,
FeSbO4
the
with Sb203 or Fe203. to vary the ensemble
size.
259
EXPERIMENTAL The catalyst
samples
were
prepared
mixtures
of oxides in flowing air.
prepared
by ammoniacal
solution
of metal-nitrates
calcination samples
composition surface
of a slurry
[Saia et al (l)].
characterized
mixture
of Sbz03 in an aqueous
RhSb04
of the oxides
by gravimetric
and structure,
of stoichiometric
The Fe, Al, Cr, and Co oxides were
precipitation
of a dry ground were
by calcination
was prepared [Brandt
analysis,
(Z)].
TABLE 1 *Characterization
All solids
All
and XRD as to
and by BET and XPS measurements
area and composition.
had the (tri)rutile
as to
structure.
of catalysts
Compound
A1Sb04
CrSb04
FeSb04
CoSbx06
RhSb09
Calc.T,*C
1050
1100
750
850
950
Surf.Area,m2/g The surface the metal
7.5
51.0
34.0
or Sb-tartrate
and carried
volume technique.
This was followed
at a temperature,
SO* lower than the original
Catalytic
1.6
Sb/M ratio was changed by impregnation nitrate
activities
were
with an amount of catalyst
with a solution
of
to the pore
by drying at 125 *C and calcination
determined
calcination
temperature.
using a fixed bed tubular
having approximately
area; this
conditions.
The flow
of reactants
gascompositions
was 120 cm3 per minute;
+ 7 O2 + 86.5 He or 2.5 CO + 2.8 O2 + 94.7
were 6.5 butene
He. Both reactions
Gas chromatographic
applied to both feed and product streams.
reactor
5 m2 surface
isothermal
run over the range of 350-SOO*C.
9.1
out according
was diluted with Sg. of Sic to achieve
analysis
by
Surface
were checked before and after the reaction
area,
analysis
were was
XPS, XRD and
260
RESULTS Table II gives the data obtained for surface compositions, selectivities
for butene oxidation and activities
TABLE II Activities
Catalysts
and selectivities
activities
for the CO oxidation.
of the MSb04 -catalysts.
1-butene
Sb/M XPS
Activity
co Selectivity
mmol/m2,h
(2~ of Ml
and
Activity
%
mmol/m2, h-
A1Sb04
1.2
1
75
1
CrSb04
3.1
2
77
7
FeSbO.,
3.2
21
84
36
CoSb206
3.2
6
47
117
RhSb04
4.2
15
17
100
Sb204
3
74
Fe203
13
33
XPS Sb 3d signal The conversions been in operation all catalysts
corrected
for 0 1s eontribution.
quoted in the table were obtained when the catalyst for at least one hour. With the exception
gave very high conversions
one hour to a level that remained before
and after
shown by fig.2.
7
this
first
for FeSb04
at the start;
constant
thereafter.
The XP- spectra considerably
as
When only exposed to O2 in l-le, two bands
at 543 and 534 EV, belonging to Sbst, were observable. reaction
of RhSbO.,,
these decayed after
hour were found to differ .
had
After the
these bands were much weaker while a new system
around 540 and 530 EV appeared.
A fresh sample,
prepared
of bands by heating
261
the precursor
mixture
another,obtained
of FeSbO., in He at 7.50 OC
by adding 2% Sbz04 to the precursor
in He (sample II), showed the
heating
stronger(seeFig. 1) while regeneration eliminated
second
set
the XRD diagrams
remained
the incipient
of bands.
It
therefore
certain that the second set belonged to Sb3t, indicating surface
became
the surface
partly
reduced
could be re-oxidized
during operation.
in He ; (D) id.with
oxidation
and very selective
seems
and
reasonably
that the catalyst’s if reduced,
temperature.
before and after reaction.
2 % Sbz03.
butene or CO oxidation.
high activity
A
Fig .2: XPS of FeSbO_, catalyst
Table II shows that Sbz04, A1Sb04, and CrSbO,, either
and again
the same.
Moreover,
by O2 at the reaction
Fig. 1: XPS of FeSb04 (C) calcined
mixture
secondset of bandsto be much
by 7% 02 in He restored the
( sampleCl and
FeSb04
for butadiene;
were hardly
active
for
was quite active for the butene it was not particularly
262
for the oxidation
active very
active
for
both reactions
Activities
oxidation.
of CO. CoSb206 and especially and quite
RebQ
unselective
for the two reactions
for
was almost
in the presence of butene for all catalysts,
except RhSbO+
In table
111 a m-vey
It was found that changing
manner, caused activity
butene parallel
entirely
it-ddited
is given of the results of experiments in which
the s&ace of’the FeSbO, -catalyst was impregnated antimony.
the
ran approximately
but it is noteworthy that the CO - oxidation
WEE
the surface
and selectivity
with either
iron or
Sb/Fe ratio
in this
of the catalyst
to be altered
considerably. TABLE III Activity
(mmole/nP,h)
XPS, Sb/Fe
3.0
2.0
activity selectivity,
8 selectivity
%
of impregnated
3.2
FeSbO+
3.3
3.8
3.9
25
22
21
17
13
9
77
a2
a4
a4
aa
92
DISCUSSION It is well known that FeSbO., has to possess 2.5 in order to be maximally containing
catalysts
USb30t0 - catalyst
exhibit by Grasselli
et al (5), explained Urlich
selective similar
(
characteristics,
et al (4).
this by assuming
importance
of the simultaneous
to activate
some oxygen anions because as observed
presence
from quadrupole
ratio Sb/Fe
Yoshino et al (3)).
Z
Other Sb-
as shown for the
Some authors,
such as Trifiro
that Sb5+ is the active
et al (6), Aso et al (7) and Burriesci
surrounding
a surface
species.
et al (8) emphasize
the
of Fe and Sb; this is supposed of a distortion shifts
of the octahedral
in Mossbauer
spectra.
263
We want to propose, and Gates
as an extension
(9) that antimony
improved
the size of the Fe - 0 ensembles Sb5+ to be almost
inactive,
of an earlier
suggestion
selectivity
because
whether present
ensemble
theory.
with increasing
reduction
FeSb04
its activity
decreased
Sb/Fe ratio in conformity
important
function
during operation:
of Sb”+
was
revealed
by its
because the to
of O2 into to two 02- anions. However, replenishment
by a two-dimensional
analogon of the reaction
+ Sb205 -
The work of Ulrich
catalyst
in the
and anion vacancies
of. spent oxygen anions can also occur by migration
reduction
partial
above, direct
by O2 may be impossible
may not have enough electrons
allow a conversion
2 Fe0
with the
it appeared to act as an intermediate
of the Fe -complexes
reduced complex
and
at the surface.
re - oxidation of a reduced site . In a model, as presented oxidation
with
Hence, one of the functions of Sb - oxide is to decrease
the size of the Fe-oxide complexes Another
We found
in Sb204, A1Sb04 or CrSb04.
Sb205 on top was less active but selective; increased
it decreased
that are the active agents.
Fez03, on the other hand, was quite active but unselective.
selectivity
by Schuit
) Fez03
:
+ Sb204
et al (6) and our
- 52
results
of Sb5+ and I-e-oxidation of Sb3+ occurred is therefore
bi-functional;
and Sb of oxygen introduction
from antimony oxide
kcal
showed
( 1 )
indeed
,that
during operation.
The
Fe takes care of the olefin oxidation
and limiting
the size of the ensemble.
TABLE IV Redox enthalpies Transition
Me0 + Sb205 and electrochem
metal cation
pot. Me2+ - Me3+
Ti
V
Cr
Mn
Fe
Co
Ni
Redox enth. ,kcal/mole
- 100
-70
-70
- 26
-52
-27
+ 13
Electrochem.Pot.
+ 2.0
+.26
t.41
-1.51
-0.77
V
-1.84
?
264
Table v presents
thermodynamic
in eq.
1 ad
cations
on the left,
therefore
the electrochemical
inactive.
difficult
data,such potentials
as Cr3+ are
such
On the right,
to re - oxidize;
as redox enthalpies
also
too stable
bivalent these
Me2+ - Me3+.
preferential position of Fe as an oxidation understood. Co ad
Rh while
type of reaction
the butene
such as Co2+, are
not be very active. The is
catalyst
emerged,
branching
oxidation,
hence
readily
at a decreased r-ate,
although
To explain this observation, a thermal
at the surface,
we suggest that a new
chain reaction
in the gas phase with
that could be written
as follows:
Co2+ + H202 -> Co3+ + OH- + OH*
(2)
Co3+ t H,O, ->
(3)
where * stands
for radicals
chain branching
during
as “afterburning”
Co2+ + H+ t HC&*
and HzOz for hydroperoxides.
homogeneous
al (10); Daniel and Keulks occurred
and
However, the oxidation of CO turned out to be very fast over
became nonselective.
catalytic
Trivalent
to be reduced
cations,
should
as used
(i
catalytic
1) have suggested
during
catalytic
oxidation
For catalytic see Sheldon
that thermal
oxidation
over
et
oxidation
Bi2Mo06.
REFERENCES 1 Sala, F and Trifiro F., J.Catal. fl, 1, 1 (1976) 2 Bra& K. ,Arkiv for Kemi, Mineralogi och Geologi, B& 1 (1943) 3 Yoshh,T. ,%ito,S. ad Sobukova,B., Japan. Patent 7,103,438 (197 1) 4 Grasse1liR.K. and Suresh,D.D. J.Catal. 25, 273,(1972) 5 Trifim, F.,Carbucichio,M and Centi, C.J.,J.Catal.,s, 85 (198.5) 6 Urich, F. J. ,Kriegsmann,H., Ohimann, G.and Scheve, J., Proc.Int.Congr.Catal.,6th., London,V2, p.836.,(19?7) 7 As4 ,Yamazoe,N. ,Amamoto,T. and Seiyama,T., Proc. Int.Congr.Cat. 7th. Tokio (1981) p.1239 8 Burriesci, N., Garbassi, F. ,Petrera,M., and Petrini,G., J.Ckm.&c. Faraday Trans. i , 78, (1982) 8 f 7. 9 SchWG.C.A. and Gates,B.C. Chemtech,Nov.,693 (1983) 10 Sheldon,R.A. and Kochi,J.K., Oxid.Comb.Rev.5,135(1973). 11 Daniel,C.and Keulks,G.W. J.Catal. 24, 529 (1972).