Knight shifts of 31P in the paramagnetic state of the UP-US solid solutions

Knight shifts of 31P in the paramagnetic state of the UP-US solid solutions

Volume 28A. number 2 PHYSICS KNIGHT SHIFTS OF OF THE 31P LETTERS IN THE UP-US 4 November PARAMAGNETIC SOLID SOLUTIONS 1968 STATE * ...

164KB Sizes 0 Downloads 35 Views

Volume

28A.

number

2

PHYSICS

KNIGHT

SHIFTS

OF

OF THE

31P

LETTERS

IN THE

UP-US

4 November

PARAMAGNETIC

SOLID

SOLUTIONS

1968

STATE *

M. KUZNIETZ, G. A. Argonne

National Laboratory, Received

Argonne

3 September

I Illinois,

USA

1968

Knight shifts of 31P were measured in the paramagnetic state of UP-US solid solutions. For all compositions K = K, axM, lK,/ cc K, and (Y = 4.0 i- 0.5 (cgs). In the uniform conduction-electronpolarization model J,f = -(2.4 I 0.4) eV is obtained.

Knight shift (K) results for 3lP in the UPlXSX at 300, 232 and 1920K are given in table 1. K increases with the decrease of temperature and with the increase of X, the sulfur concentration. By the use of the molar susceptibility ( xM) data of Allbutt and Junkison [6] (not studied for UPO.8&33), a linear dependence of K on XM is found, K = K. + ‘YxM with IK,l s-
Knight shift measurements have been reported for 3lP in the paramagnetic state of all uranium phosphides (UP, U3P4, and UP2) [l-4]. This letter reports the extension of these measurements to the paramagnetic state of the UP1 _XSX system. UP and US show a complete miscibility. UP is antiferromagnetic and US is ferromagnetic. The UP-US solid solutions have the NaCl-type structure and are good conductors of electricity (p = 200 E.152 -cm at room temperature) [5]. The UP-US solid solutions were prepared by mixing the desired amounts of the UP and US components, pelletizing, and homogenizing in vacuum for three hours at 1800°C. Approximately 1 g of fine powders (- 250 mesh) were used for the NMR measurements. * This work was performed under the auspices United States Atomic Energy Commission.

The temperature

dependence

ff = Jsf Ke k’J -

where J,f is the s-f exchange constant, is the Land6 factor, PB is the Bohr magneton, NA is gJ

of the

of the 31 P Knight

Table 1 shift in the paramagnetic

Magnetic

ordering

$

(OK)

state

of the UP1__$x

system.

K x lo4

TN, TCIP Composition

1)/2gJPB2NA ,

300°K

232OK

192oK

antiferromagnetic

125

200 * 3

270 I 3

330 + 10

upo.95so.05

antiferromagnetic

122

205 + 3

279 + 3

360 f 11

upo.90so.10

antiferromagnetic

102

212 i- 5

302 i 5

372 f 11 410 + 2ott

UP

UPo.afiSo.15

antiferromagnetic

95

220 f 6

322 i 5

up0.i’5s0.25

ferromagnetic

102

232 i 6

355 f 8

520 f 30 XT

up0.67s0.33

ferromagnetic

118

245 -t 6

380 f 20 I$

610 i 503f

UPo.5oSo.50

ferromagnetic

150

266 + 6

345 -I 20 $$

770 f- 65 XX

1 Data obtained in a recent neutron diffraction study [12]. are too wide for CW detection; K determined

I$ NMR lines

122

The ordering refers by pulsed NMR.

to the region

below

TN or TC.

Volume

28A.

” so-

",SO-

x E 3

number

2

PHYSICS

F-If% 0 . h s 0 .

L 0 0.05 0.10 0.1, O.LI 0.*0

I

P

-

s, D lA

z 3

00

tween the uranium ions, with the number of conduction electrons per uranium atom (2) varying from about one in UP to about two in US. This variation is expected to be manifested in the RKKY sums which appear in the RKKY analysis of cy 1111. However, the non-dependence of N on X (or .Z), or the non-oscillatory character of o, indicates that a simple RKKY model is inadequate to describe the Knight shift results in the UP1 _XSX system.

1.

5

I

I

IO

15

I

2. 3.

20

x,x Idkpr, Fig. 1. The dependence the molar susceptibility (with the temperature

November 1968

References

0,

I

4

We wish to thank Dr. G. H. Lander for helpful comments on this letter.

+

40-

20-

LETTERS

of the Knight shift of 31P on in the UP-US solid solutions as an implicit variable).

the Avogadro number, and K, is the Knight shift in the isostructural diamagnetic compound. By using Ke of 31P in ThP [9] + (4.4 f 0.2) x 10-4 and assuming U+4 ions and 5f2 configuration @J = 0.8) [lo], a value of J,f = -(2.4 f 0.4) eV is obtained similar to the value of Jones [2] for U3P4. J,f is negative, as in the lanthanide compounds, but one order of magnitude larger, probably due to the larger extent of the 5f electronic functions. The model proposed to account for the magnetic properties of UP and US and their solid solutions [ lo] suggests RKKY-type interactions be-

4. 5.

6.

7.

8. 9.

10.

11. 12.

B.A. Scott, K. A. Gingerich and R. A. Bernheim. Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 387. E. D. Jones, Phys. Letters 25A (1967) 111. K. R. K. Easwaran. V. U. S. Rao. R. Vijayaraghavan and V. R. K. Rao. Phys. Letters 25A (1967) 683. F. Friedman, J. Grunzweig and M. Kuznietz, Ph.vs. Letters 25A (1967) 690. Y. Baskin and P. D. Shalek. Proc. Int. Symp. on Compounds of Interest in Nuclear Reactor Technology (Boulder, Colorado. 1965) pp. 457-461; a a paper on the UP-US system has been submitted to J. Am. Ceram. Sot. M. A. Allhutt and A. R. Junkison. Chemistry Division. Harnell. United Kingdom. Report AERE R5465 (1967). M. Kuznietz. submitted to Phys. Rev. W. B. Lewis. S. W. Rabideau. N. H. Krikorian and W. G. Witteman, Phys. Rev. 170 (1968) 455. M.Kuznietz. J. Chem. Phys.. to be published. J. Grunzweig and M. Kuznietz. J. Appl. Phys. 39 J.Grunzweig. M.Kuznietz and F.Friedman. Phys. Rev. 173 (1968) 562. K. H. Buschow, J. F. Fast, A.M. Van Diepen and H. W. De Wijn. Phvs. Stat. Sol. 24 (1967) 714. M. Kuznietz. G. H. Lander and Y. Baskin, to be published.

123