Accepted Manuscript Title: Label-free electrochemical immunosensor for direct detection of Citrus tristeza virus using modified gold electrode Author:
Hedieh Haji-Hashemi Parviz Norouzi Mohammad Reza Safarnejad Mohammad Reza Ganjali PII: DOI: Reference:
S0925-4005(16)32106-2 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.135 SNB 21509
To appear in:
Sensors and Actuators B
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
24-9-2016 14-12-2016 28-12-2016
Please cite this article as: Hedieh Haji-Hashemi, Parviz Norouzi, Mohammad Reza Safarnejad, Mohammad Reza Ganjali, Label-free electrochemical immunosensor for direct detection of Citrus tristeza virus using modified gold electrode, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.135 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Label-free electrochemical immunosensor for direct detection of Citrus tristeza virus using modified gold electrode
Hedieh Haji-Hashemi1, Parviz Norouzi*1,2, Mohammad Reza Safarnejad3, Mohammad Reza Ganjali1,2 1
Center of Excellence in Electrochemistry, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2
Endocrinology & Metabolism Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran 3
Agricultural research, education and extension organization, Iranian Research Institute of
Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +98-21-61112788; Fax: +98-21-66495291 E-mail address: [email protected]
Highlights
The first electrochemical immunosensor for citrus tristeza virus (CTV) detection.
Simplification of the operation as a result of labeling steps elimination.
Excellent specificity of proposed sensor against interferences from real samples.
Outstanding LOD that is noticeably lower than previous reports for CTV detection.
Abstract This paper presents the first label-free and sensitive electrochemical immunosensor for efficient and rapid detection of citrus tristeza virus (CTV). The specific antibody against coat protein (CP) of CTV was successfully immobilized on 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) and 3-mercapto propionic acid (MPA) modified gold electrode via carbodiimide coupling reaction using
N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethyl
carbodiimide
hydrochloride
(EDC)
and
N-
HydroxySuccinamide (NHS). Electrochemical characterizations of the immunosensor (antiCTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode) were carried out by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Electrochemical detection was performed by differential pulse voltammetry in [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− solution. The decrease in the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− current upon increasing antigen concentrations on the immunosensor surface was determined in the range of 1 nM to 5 µM. The developed immunosensor provided a much lower limit of detection (LOD=0.27 nM) than ELISA and other reported immunoassay techniques for CTV detection. The specificity of the immunosensor was also examined and no significant interference from other analytes in the real sample was observed. The proposed immunosensor is simple, relatively inexpensive, and shows good sensitivity for this application. Keywords: Label-free immunosensor; Citrus tristeza virus; Self assembled monolayer; Electrochemical detection.
1. Introduction Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) is one of the most economically important and damaging diseases in citrus trees [1]. It can be spread quickly and do damage by killing trees with sour orange rootstock [2]. CTV epidemics have caused significant losses in fruit yield and death of millions of citrus trees in many regions all over the world [3]. Therefore, rapid detection of this virus in early stages of infection is significantly critical for producing of virus free plants in nurseries and managing of disease in gardens. To date, several methods have been developed for the detection of CTV such as biological indexing [4], serological and immunoassay [5, 6] and polymerase chain reaction based techniques (PCR) [7, 8]. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and direct tissue blot immunoassay (DTBIA) are the most frequent techniques in CTV detection but these techniques are costly, time consuming and multistep process [7]. Recently, a number of immunosensors have been developed for CTV detection [9, 10]. Despite the advantage of high sensitivity, these sensors require labeling steps that make the analytical procedure more complicated, time consuming and laborious. Therefore, developments of label free immunosensors have attracted a great deal of attention. In fabrication of label-free immunosensors, various transduction methods such as electrochemical, piezoelectric, surface plasmon resonance and cantilevers have been used [1114]. Among these methods, electrochemical immunosensors offer good possibilities for sensitive, low cost, fast and simple detection of unlabeled proteins [15-19]. In electrochemical label-free immunosensors, the formation of antibody–antigen complex at the electrode surface changes the mass and thickness of the electrode surface, which in turn blocks the electron transfer of the redox probe to the electrode surface [20, 21]. Therefore, the key factor here is the immobilization of the antibody or antigen on the electrode surface with no non-specific binding [22]. Attachment of proteins to the carboxylic acid end-groups of self-assembled monolayers (SAM) of alkyl thiols on the surface of gold electrode has been widely used for antibodies immobilization [23-25]. Functionalization of gold surfaces with highly ordered monolayer of alkyl thiols can be efficiently achieve via strong S-Au bond [22, 26]. SAMs reduce random orientation of the antibodies binding to the surface and enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of electrochemical immunosensor [27].
In the present study, we have developed a “label-free” electrochemical immunosensor for the direct detection of low concentrations of CTV antigen, using anti-CTV antibody (anti-CTV) immobilized on a SAM modified gold electrode. The interaction of antibody and CTV antigen at the surface of the modified electrode was investigated by differential pulse voltammetry technique in the presence of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− as a redox probe. The linear dynamic range and limit of detection of the presented immunosensor were compared with ELISA and other recently reported immunoassays for CTV detection.
2. Experimental 2.1.
Materials and reagents
Purified rabbit polyclonal anti-CTV IgG antibody (1 mg/ml) and CTV antigen (coat protein of CTV, CP-CTV, 1 mg/ml) were obtained from department of Plant Viruses, Iranian Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran. 11-Mercapto Undecanoic acid 95% (MUA), 3-Mercapto Propionic acid 99% (MPA), N-(3-Dimethyla-minopropyl)-N′-ethyl carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-Hydroxy Succinimide 98% (NHS), bovine serum albumin (BSA), potassium chloride (KCl), potassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6), potassium ferrocyanide (K4Fe(CN)6) and Tween-20 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich chemicals. Other chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Phosphate buffer saline (PBS: 10mM Na2HPO4, 10mM KH2PO4, 150mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and PBST buffer (10mM Na2HPO4, 10mM KH2PO4, 0.05% W/V Tween 20, pH7.4) were prepared in Milli-Q water.
2.2.
Apparatus
All electrochemical experiments involving cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) were performed at room temperature using a PalmSens potentiostat (Palm Instrument BV, the Netherlands). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out in a faraday cage with a low noise AutoLab Potentiostat PGSTAT302N (Metrohm AutoLab BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands). All measurements were performed in a conventional three-electrode cell configuration consisting of a gold disk electrode (3mm diameter) as working electrode, Ag/AgCl reference electrode and a platinum wire counter electrode.
2.3.
Gold electrode preparation
It was observed that strong cleaning of the gold electrode is required for the reproducible formation of SAMs, so the electrode was cleaned by immersing in piranha’s solution (1:3, 30% H2O2 and concentrated H2SO4, respectively) at 60 °C for 5 min then rinsed with deionized water and repeated the procedure twice (caution: Piranha’s solution is a powerful oxidizing agent and reacts violently with organic compounds. It is necessary to prepare this solution under fume hood conditions and protect hands with gloves). Prior to immobilization, the electrode was also subjected to the electrochemical pretreatment by cycling electrode potential between 0.0 and 1.5 V versus Ag/AgCl reference electrode with a scan rate of 0.1 Vs−1 for 25 scans in 0.5 M sulfuric acid solution. Then the electrode was rinsed with deionized water and dried using pure nitrogen gas.
2.4.
Fabrication of immunosensor
First, the cleaned gold electrode was immersed in 5 mM MUA/MPA (7:3; v/v) solution in ethanol overnight and a SAM of MUA/MPA obtained on the gold electrode surface (MUAMPA/Au electrode) [28]. Then the modified electrode was rinsed with ethanol to remove any unbound molecules. In the next step the MUA-MPA/Au electrode was immersed in a solution of EDC (400 mM) and NHS (100 mM) for 1 h to activate the terminal carboxylic groups to NHS esters, and then it was rinsed with deionized water. For anti-CTV immobilization, a 10 µL of 0.5 mgml-1 of anti-CTV antibody solution in PBS was dropped on the modified gold electrode and incubated for 1.5 h at 37 °C. The excess antibodies were removed by rinsing with PBS. After antibody immobilization, the electrode was incubated with a solution of 1% BSA in PBST for 1 h at room temperature in order to block the unreacted COOH groups and non-specific sites, followed by washing with PBST. Anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode was stored in the refrigerator until use for CP-CTV antigen detection. Scheme 1 represents the electrode modification and the immunosensor fabrication steps.
2.5.
Antigen detection
For antigen detection, 10 µL of CP-CTV standard solutions at different concentrations (1
nM to 10 µM) or 10 µL of spiked samples was applied to the anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode surface and incubated for 1h at 37 °C prior to rinsing electrode with PBST. The specificity of the anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode was determined by the antigen concentrations that have been spiked in healthy plant sap samples.
2.5.1. Sap extraction from plant materials The infected and healthy samples were collected from citrus fields located in Sari region in Mazandaran province, Iran. Young leaves from four different locations around the canopy were collected and stored at −20 °C until use. The presence and confirmation of CTV infection was performed at the plant virus diseases department of Iranian research institute of plant protection by using ELISA. Plant sap was extracted from healthy citrus trees by crushing 0.1 g leaves in liquid nitrogen followed by suspension in 2000μl Tris-HCL buffer (pH 7.5). The sap samples were then stored at −20 °C until use.
3. Results and discussions 3.1.
Characterization of Anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode
Characterization of the anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode was carried out by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. All electrochemical measurements were performed in PBS solution, pH 7.4, containing 250 mM KCl and 5mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 5mM K4[Fe(CN)6]. Ferri/ferrocyanide electron transfer kinetics changes at different electrode surfaces and therefore, this redox couple used to investigate the changes in electrode behavior after each surface modification step [29, 30]. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were performed in the potential range from −0.5 to 0.7 V with a scan rate of 0.05 Vs-1. Fig. 1A shows the ferri/ferrocyanide CVs of the bare Au (curve a), MUA-MPA/Au (curve b), EDC/NHS activated MUA-MPA/Au (curve c) and anti-CTV/MUAMPA/Au (curve d) electrodes. As expected, the bare Au electrode showed a well-defined characteristic reversible peak that signifies the fast heterogeneous charge transport kinetics (Fig. 1A, curve a). The homogeneous self-assembled monolayer of long-chain alkane thiols, such as MUA may leads to steric hindrance and disorder of the bulky terminal groups due to its high densities of the surface terminal groups. Therefore, combination of MPA and MUA has been
used to avoid these drawbacks and allowing access of chemical species in solution, such as redox mediator, to the electrode surface [22, 30]. The cyclic voltammogram of
MUA-MPA/Au
electrode presents less faradic currents and more peak separation (ΔEp) between the cathodic and anodic waves, due to repulsive interaction of COO− polyanion and negative redox ions [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− at the surface interface which confirms SAM formation (Fig. 1A, curve b) [31]. The activation with EDC/NHS converts the majority of terminal carboxylic groups to NHS esters, so the repulsive interaction with anionic probe [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− at the electrode interface declines and the transfer of the redox ions to the electrode surface promotes. Consequently, as it can be observed from curve c in Fig. 1A, the formed monolayers became less insulating, and faradic current response increased. As a final point, the covalent immobilization of the anti-CTV antibody onto the activated electrode surface acts as an inert electron transfer blocking layer, and so hinders the diffusion of redox couple towards the electrode surface. For that reason, as shown in curve d, the anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode showed less faradic currents than EDC/NHS activated MUA-MPA/Au electrode. EIS experiments were further performed to probe the features of different steps of electrode modification [32-34]. The impedance spectrum known as Nyquist plot includes a semicircle part at high frequencies and a linear part at lower frequencies. The semicircle diameter corresponds to the electron-transfer resistance (Rct) which indicates the blocking behavior of the electrode surface towards the redox couple while the linear part corresponds to the diffusion process. EIS measurements were performed at a DC potential of 0.2 V with AC amplitude of 0.01 V, in which the Nyquist plots were recorded over a frequency range from 0.1Hz to 1 MHz. Fig. 1B illustrates the EIS curves for the electrode modification steps including bare Au (curve a), MUA-MPA/Au (curve b), EDC/NHS activated MUA-MPA/Au (curve c) and antiCTV/MUA-MPA/Au (curve d) electrodes. The Nyquist plot of the bare Au electrode displayed almost straight line which points to existence of diffusion controlled electrochemical process at the electrode surface (Fig. 1B, curve a).
For MUA-MPA/Au electrode, the value of Rct
significantly increased to 6.92 K, due to the high blocking effect of the SAM for [Fe(CN)6]3−/4 ions (Fig. 1B, curve b). However, in case of curve c, the Rct value was dramatically decreased to 1.21 K, after the activation of MUA-MPA/Au electrode surface with EDC/NHS. This may due
to enhancement of the [Fe(CN)6]3/4− redox reaction rate at anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode surface, as shown in the CV results. Since the covalent immobilization of the anti-CTV antibody onto the activated electrode surface acts as an inert electron transfer blocking layer, the antiCTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode showed higher Rct value than EDC/NHS activated MUAMPA/Au electrode (Fig. 1B, curve d).
3.2.
Electrochemical response to antigen
Fig. 2 shows the cyclic voltammograms of the anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode in the presence of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox probe before (curve b) and after incubation with 1 µM of CPCTV antigen (curve c). The formation of immunocomplex onto the electrode surface acts as an inert electron transfer blocking layer and so hinders the diffusion of redox couple towards the electrode surface. Therefore, the CP-CTV/anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode (Fig. 2, curve c) showed less faradic peak currents and more ΔEp than anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode (Fig. 2, curve b). Since DPV is a more sensitive electrochemical technique compare to CV [35, 36], immunodetection of CP-CTV antigen was performed with this method and based on the measurement of faradaic peak current of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox couple. For this purpose, the antiCTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode was exposed to various concentrations of CP-CTV in the range of 1 nM to 10 µM. DPV measurements were carried out in the same solution used for CV measurements under following conditions; (modulation time= 0.1 s, interval time= 0.2 s, initial
potential= −0.1 V,
end
potential= 0.5 V,
step potential= 0.01 V,
modulation
amplitude= 0.05 V). The height of the resulting peak waveform was recorded and plotted against CP-CTV concentration to give a calibration curve. The DPV signals recorded for increasing concentrations of CP-CTV on anti-CTV/MUAMPA/Au electrode is shown in Fig. 3. The value of the DPV peak current of the redox probe reflects the amount of immunocomplex formation at the electrode surface. Since the antigenantibody coupling at the electrode surface acts as a kinetic barrier for the ionic transfer, a
significant decrease in the DPV peak currents can be observed upon increasing antigen concentrations. Similar behavior of ferro/ferricyanide was reported for other target molecules in the literature [15, 16]. Fig. 4 shows the immunosensor differential responses (DPV response for incubation with CP-CTV antigen subtracted from the response for incubation with PBS) versus CP-CTV concentrations. As shown, there was a logarithmic relationship between the changes in the DPV peak currents (ΔIs) and CP-CTV antigen concentration (CCP_CTV). The inset of Fig. 4 shows the linear relationship between ΔI(µA) and log(CCP_CTV) (nM) in the range of 1 nM to 5 μM with the linear regression equation of ΔI(µA)=11.014 log(CCP_CTV) (nM) + 22.82 and correlation coefficient of 0.996. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were 0.27 and 0.97 nM respectively, calculated using the equations: LOD=3s/S and LOQ=10s/S (where s is the standard deviation of the response and S is the slope of the calibration curve)[37]. The reproducibility of the immunosensors was evaluated at 1 nM CP-CTV with five electrodes fabricated at the same conditions. The RSD% value was 3.9%, suggesting that the assay is reproducible under the tested conditions. The storage stability of the immunosensor was investigated over a 30-day period when three immunosensors were stored at 4оC without chemical preservatives and characterized at regular interval times (every 3 days). No obvious change of initial signal (less than 10%) was found over this period, indicating the effective retention of the activity of the immunosensor. Table 1 summarized the performance of the presented immunosensor and other recent immunoassay methods for CP-CTV detection. As it can be seen, the developed electrochemical immunosensor displayed better detection limit, linear range and linear regression coefficient in comparison to ELISA and other immunoassay methods for the CP-CTV detection.
3.3.
Selectivity of the immunosensor
In order to demonstrate the selectivity of the immunosensor, the response of the immunosensor to higher concentrations of other proteins was examined. To achieve this purpose, different anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrodes was incubated with 1 mM BSA and 1 mM myoglobin (Mb) for 1 h at 37 °C prior to rinsing the electrode with PBST. In addition, the response of immunosensor to possible interferences from real sample was examined by incubation of anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode with healthy plant sap sample. After the incubation step, DPV measurements were performed and the signal (ΔI), which was obtained for each of these samples, was compared to the signal obtained for CP-CTV (considered 100%) at concentration of 1 nM. The obtained results are presented in Fig. 5. The insignificant responses of the immunosensor to such samples demonstrated the existence of negligible affinity interaction between anti-CTV and higher concentrations of other proteins or possible interferences from real sample, which is an indication of worthy selectivity of the proposed immunosensor.
3.4.
Real sample analysis
The ability of the CTV immunosensor to detect CP-CTV Ag in real samples was also examined. For this aim, the anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode was incubated with healthy plant sap samples spiked with six different concentration of CP-CTV: 0 nM, 1 nM, 10 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM and 1 µM. The obtained DPV signals from these artificially infected samples are shown in Fig. 6 and as presented in the inset of figure, there was a linear relationship between normalized ΔI (µA) values and log(CCP_CTV) (nM). The lower slope of this linear relationship in comparison to the slope achieved from CTV samples in PBS (Fig. 4, inset) showed the influence of the matrix on the efficiency of CTV Ag and the immobilized Ab interaction, which could slightly affect the sensitivity of the immunosensor in real sample. But as shown in Fig. 5, there is no significant cross reactivity between the immunosensor and possible interferences from sap samples. Therefore, in spite of the fact that the matrix can slightly effect on the sensitivity of the
immunosensor, it cannot lead to false positive or negative responses. Furthermore, the proposed immunosensor was employed for detection of CP-CTV in different real and artificially infected samples using explained method. The results obtained from real healthy and infected samples were in good agreement with standard ELISA method. Table 2 shows the results of immunosensor performance in artificially infected samples. These results confirmed that the detection limit of the anti- CTV/MUA-MPA/Au immunosensor is much lower than ELISA and the immunosensor can be applied well for quantification of CP-CTV in real samples.
4. Conclusions This work described a simple, sensitive and label-free electrochemical immunosensor for the fast and direct detection of CTV. The CV and EIS methods were used to characterize the individual steps of the immunosensor fabrication, and the antibody-antigen interaction at the electrode surface was evaluated by DPV method. Compared with the other reported immunoassay techniques for CP-CTV detection, our method displayed a much lower detection limit (0.27 nM) and a higher linear regression coefficient (0.996). It also eliminates the need for labeling with secondary antibodies, which is often necessary for making such immunoassays. In conclusion, constructing such label-free electrochemical immunosensor can be considered as a promising strategy method for production of portable devices for in situ CTV detection in near future.
Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the Research Council of University of Tehran for the financial support of this work.
Biographies Hedieh Haji-Hashemi is a PhD student in analytical chemistry at University of Tehran since 2014. She also obtained her MSc Degree in analytical chemistry from University of Tehran in 2013. She has worked on the design and fabrication of new biosensors such as immunosensors and DNA-based sensors. Parviz Norouzi has a Ph.D. in analytical chemistry obtained at Sasckatchuane University in 1999. He is currently an associate professor of chemistry at University of Tehran. His research work has been mainly focused on new electrochemical methods and also the design of new sensors. Mohammad Reza Safarnejad has a PhD in molecular plant virology from RWTH-Aachen University, Germany. He is currently an assistant professor in Dept. of Plant Viruses, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection. His research has mainly been focused on production of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for design and construction of nano-biosensors. Mohammad Reza Ganjali has a Ph.D. in analytical chemistry obtained at University of Tehran in 1997. He is currently a professor of analytical chemistry at University of Tehran. His research work has been mainly focused on the design of new chemical sensors.
References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. 16.
17.
18.
Atta, S., et al., Distribution and research advances of Citrus tristeza virus. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012. 11(3): p. 346-358. Agrios, G.N., Plant pathology. Vol. 5. 2005: Elsevier Academic Press Burlington. Bar-Joseph, M. and R. Lee, Citrus tristeza virus. AAB descriptions of plant viruses, 1989. 353(7). Roistacher, C.N., Graft-transmissible diseases of citrus: Handbook for detection and diagnosis. 1991: Food & Agriculture Org. Lin, Y., et al., In Situ Immunoassay for Detection of Citrus tristeza virus. Plant Disease, 2000. 84(9): p. 937-940. Martín, S., et al., Detection of Citrus psorosis virus in field trees by direct tissue blot immunoassay in comparison with ELISA, symptomatology, biological indexing and cross-protection tests. Plant Pathology, 2002. 51(2): p. 134-141. Saponari, M., K. Manjunath, and R.K. Yokomi, Quantitative detection of Citrus tristeza virus in citrus and aphids by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (TaqMan®). Journal of Virological Methods, 2008. 147(1): p. 43-53. Saponari, M., et al., Validation of high-throughput real time polymerase chain reaction assays for simultaneous detection of invasive citrus pathogens. Journal of virological methods, 2013. 193(2): p. 478-486. Shojaei, T.R., et al., Detection of Citrus tristeza virus by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based biosensor. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2016. 169: p. 216-222. Shojaei, T.R., et al., Fluorometric immunoassay for detecting the plant virus Citrus tristeza using carbon nanoparticles acting as quenchers and antibodies labeled with CdTe quantum dots. Microchimica Acta, 2016: p. 1-11. Santharaman, P., et al., Label-free electrochemical immunosensor for the rapid and sensitive detection of the oxidative stress marker superoxide dismutase 1 at the point-ofcare. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2016. 236: p. 546-553. Chauhan, R., et al., Label-free piezoelectric immunosensor decorated with gold nanoparticles: Kinetic analysis and biosensing application. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2016. 222: p. 804-814. Luz, J.G.G., et al., Development and evaluation of a SPR-based immunosensor for detection of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in human serum. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2015. 212: p. 287-296. Campbell, G.A., D. deLesdernier, and R. Mutharasan, Detection of airborne Bacillus anthracis spores by an integrated system of an air sampler and a cantilever immunosensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2007. 127(2): p. 376-382. Hayat, A., et al., Development of a novel label-free amperometric immunosensor for the detection of okadaic acid. Analytica chimica acta, 2012. 724: p. 92-97. He, P., et al., Development of a label-free electrochemical immunosensor based on carbon nanotube for rapid determination of clenbuterol. Food Chemistry, 2009. 112(3): p. 707-714. Pandey, C.M., et al., Highly sensitive electrochemical immunosensor based on graphenewrapped copper oxide-cysteine hierarchical structure for detection of pathogenic bacteria. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2017. 238: p. 1060-1069. Rocha, C.G., A.A.P. Ferreira, and H. Yamanaka, Label-free impedimetric immunosensor
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
for detection of the textile azo dye Disperse Red 1 in treated water. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2016. 236: p. 52-59. Luna, D.M.N., et al., Electrochemical immunosensor for dengue virus serotypes based on 4-mercaptobenzoic acid modified gold nanoparticles on self-assembled cysteine monolayers. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2015. 220: p. 565-572. Liu, X., P.A. Duckworth, and D.K. Wong, Square wave voltammetry versus electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a rapid detection technique at electrochemical immunosensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2010. 25(6): p. 14671473. Huang, H., P. Ran, and Z. Liu, Impedance sensing of allergen–antibody interaction on glassy carbon electrode modified by gold electrodeposition. Bioelectrochemistry, 2007. 70(2): p. 257-262. Briand, E., et al., Building of an immunosensor: How can the composition and structure of the thiol attachment layer affect the immunosensor efficiency? Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2006. 22(3): p. 440-448. Jarocka, U., et al., An electrochemical immunosensor based on a 4,4′-thiobisbenzenethiol self-assembled monolayer for the detection of hemagglutinin from avian influenza virus H5N1. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2016. 228: p. 25-30. Gutiérrez-Zúñiga, G.G. and J.L. Hernández-López, Sensitivity improvement of a sandwich-type ELISA immunosensor for the detection of different prostate-specific antigen isoforms in human serum using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and an ordered and hierarchically organized interfacial supramolecular architecture. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2016. 902: p. 97-106. Sayıklı Şimşek, Ç., M. Nur Sonuç Karaboğa, and M.K. Sezgintürk, A new immobilization procedure for development of an electrochemical immunosensor for parathyroid hormone detection based on gold electrodes modified with 6-mercaptohexanol and silane. Talanta, 2015. 144: p. 210-218. Whitesides, G.M. and P.E. Laibinis, Wet chemical approaches to the characterization of organic surfaces: self-assembled monolayers, wetting, and the physical-organic chemistry of the solid-liquid interface. Langmuir, 1990. 6(1): p. 87-96. Ahmad, A. and E. Moore, Electrochemical immunosensor modified with self-assembled monolayer of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid on gold electrodes for detection of benzo [a] pyrene in water. Analyst, 2012. 137(24): p. 5839-5844. Stan, D., et al., Electrochemical studies of homogeneous self-assembled monolayers versus mixed self-assembled monolayers on gold electrode for “label free” detection of heart fatty acid binding protein. Thin Solid Films, 2012. 526: p. 143-149. Montrose, A., et al., Impedimetric immunosensor for the detection of circulating proinflammatory monocytes as infection markers. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2013. 49: p. 305-311. Sharma, V., et al., Electrochemical impedance immunosensor for the detection of cardiac biomarker Myogobin (Mb) in aqueous solution. Thin Solid Films, 2010. 519(3): p. 11671170. Su, X.-L. and Y. Li, A self-assembled monolayer-based piezoelectric immunosensor for rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2004. 19(6): p. 563-574. Liu, S., et al., Electrochemical immunosensor based on mesoporous nanocomposites and
33.
34.
35. 36.
37.
HRP-functionalized nanoparticles bioconjugates for sensitivity enhanced detection of diethylstilbestrol. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2012. 166: p. 562-568. Liu, X.-P., et al., Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensor for ochratoxin A using gold colloid-mediated hapten immobilization. Analytical Biochemistry, 2009. 389(1): p. 63-68. Tuteja, S.K., et al., A label-free electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of cardiac marker using graphene quantum dots (GQDs). Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2016. 86: p. 548-556. Zheng, L., et al., A sandwich HIV p24 amperometric immunosensor based on a direct gold electroplating-modified electrode. Molecules, 2012. 17(5): p. 5988-6000. Huang, K.-J., et al., A disposable electrochemical immunosensor for carcinoembryonic antigen based on nano-Au/multi-walled carbon nanotubes–chitosans nanocomposite film modified glassy carbon electrode. Analytica chimica acta, 2010. 659(1): p. 102-108. Swartz, M.E. and I.S. Krull, Handbook of analytical validation. 2012: CRC Press.
Caption of Figures:
Scheme 1. Schematic presentation of the immunosensor fabrication.
Fig. 1. (A) Cyclic voltammograms and (B) Nyquist plots of (a) bare Au, (b) MUA-MPA/Au, (c) EDC/NHS activated MUA-MPA/Au and (d) anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrodes in PBS solution, pH 7.4, containing 250 mM KCl and 5mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 5mM K4[Fe(CN)6], Scan rate 0.05 Vs-1. Frequency range 0.1Hz to 1 MHz, DC potential of 0.2 V and AC amplitude of 0.01 V.
Fig. 2. Cyclic voltammograms of the (a) bare Au, (b) anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au and (c) CPCTV/anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrodes in PBS solution, pH 7.4, containing 250 mM KCl and 5mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 5mM K4[Fe(CN)6] and the scan rate of 0.05 Vs-1.
Fig. 3. Differential
pulse
voltammograms
of
anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode after
incubation with (a-h) 0 nM, 1 nM, 10 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM, 1 µM, 5 µM and 10 µM of CPCTV in PBS solution, pH 7.4, containing 250 mM KCl and 5mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 5mM K4[Fe(CN)6].
Fig. 4. Variation of the immunosensor response against the CP-CTV concentrations in the range of 1 nM to 10 μM. The inset shows the linear relationship between ΔI (µA) and log(CCP_CTV) (nM) in the range of 1 nM to 5 μM.
Fig. 5. Relative magnitudes of the signals obtained from the immunosensor after incubation in 1 nM CP-CTV, 1 mM BSA, 1 mM Mb and healthy plant sap sample (HP).
Fig. 6. Differential pulse voltammograms of anti-CTV/MUA-MPA/Au electrode after incubation with (a-f): 0 nM, 1 nM, 10 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM and 1 µM of CP-CTV spiked in healthy plant sap samples. The inset figure is the linear relationship between ΔI (µA) and log(CCP_CTV) (nM) for these samples.
Table 1. Comparison of presented immunosensor with other reported immunoassay methods for the detection of CP-CTV.
Method
Linear range
LOD
R2
Reference
ELISA
34-340 nM
98 nM
0.91
[9]
FRET-based biosensor
3.4-34 nM
4.4 nM
0.98
[9]
Fluorometric immunoassay
3.4-34 nM
7.5 nM
0.94
[10]
Electrochemical immunosensor
1nM-5µM
0.27 nM
0.99
This work
Table 2. Results of immunosensor performance in real sample.
Added (nM) 0.00 1.00 10.0 100.0 *Not Detected
Found (nM) 1.02 9.70 99.2
Recovery (%) 102 97 99.2
RSD (%) (N=3) 3.58 2.83 2.91
ELISA N.D.* N.D. N.D. 101.6