Labor—PR for

Labor—PR for

l.abor-N':J.(otlatlon[llJ 26]4 Ll BOll--PR rOil 1607 Bennett, George. New horizons for mediation. Personnel, 51, Jan 1974, 4]-52. 1608 Bok, Derek C. a...

67KB Sizes 0 Downloads 31 Views

l.abor-N':J.(otlatlon[llJ 26]4 Ll BOll--PR rOil 1607 Bennett, George. New horizons for mediation. Personnel, 51, Jan 1974, 4]-52. 1608 Bok, Derek C. and Dunlop, John T. Labor and the Alerican Com.unity. New York: Silon and Schuster, 1970. 542 pp. 1609 Kochran, T. 1. Correlates of state pUblic e.ployee bargaining laws. Ind II, 12, Oct 1973, ]22-37. 1610 Labor relations yearbook -- 1974. Washington, D.C.:Bureau of National Affairs, 1975. Annual covering all phases of collective bargaining. 1611 O'Connor, Jales Farrell. Organizational failure and Survival: the case of teachers' unions. PhD diss., Uni,. of Washington, 1973. DA]4:5]57A. What keeps a local teachers' union ali ,e? 1612 Orton, Peter. How the PR people could strike it rlch. Camraign, Feb. 9 1973, ]5. Public relations workers in Great 1 Britain have largely overlooked field of labor relations. 613 Sloane, 1. A. Unions and union imagery. Personnel J, 52, Junp 197], 470-4. Positive activities by labor union. ALso SEE ENTRIES: 0~84, 0~89, 0615, 0646, 0656, 0670, 0705, 0774, 0784, 078!1, 080], 0829, 0865, 0874, 0881, 0897, 0927, 0948, 1172, 1221, 1502, 1518, 1520, 1614, 1618, 1619, 1628, 16]2, 1637, 1638, 1640, 1644, 1711, 2022, 2242 LABOR--NEGOTIATIONS

1~14 A burst of anger from public employees.

Bsns W, 2341, July 27 1974, 54. The're no longer willing to listen to city pleas 1 of poverty. 61~ Balke, W. ". and others. Alternate approach to 1 labor-unage.ent relations. Adm Sci 0, la, sept 197], 311-27. 616 Bennett, George. Encouraging settlements and discouraging strikes. Pub Pers "qt, 2, Nov 1973, 449-55. Procedures to resol'e labor disputes should be tailored to the klnd of 1 business the rarties are in. 617 81um, A. A. Effect of lotivational prograls on collective bargaining. Personnel J, 52, July 197], 6]3-41. Why labor fails to utilize the job enrichment concept at the bargaining 1 table. 618 Burke, D. R. and Rubin, L. Is contract rejection a ujor COllective bargaining problem? Ind 6 Labor Rel R, 26, Jan 16 ' 9],820-33. lq Choich, R., Jr. Factors related to collectiVE bargalning preferences along hospital pharaacists. AI J Hosp Pharm, ]1, 16 /lay 1974, 4'56-"6. 20 COhen, Abrahal. Coordinated bargaining at General Electric: 16 an analysis. PhD diss., Cornell Uni'., 197]. 21 Construction: trying to speed wage decisions. Bsns W, 2262, Jan 13 1973, 59. Decentralizp decision-laking and 16 broaden the scope ot bargalnlng. 22 Polker, David A. 4nd POlrinse, David. Preparations for a POtpntlal strike. Hcapitals, 47:18, Sept 16 1973, 51-'5'5. The at!ntinistration ot "t. Sinai Ho s pLt a L, N.Y. City, ude @l4bor4te rlans tor the lanpower aspects ot a thre4tened 16 labor fitrike. 2] Por.stell, Wlllul L. "ayors report. aggressive labor n~1otiatlon, not contr4ct language, is key to productlvlty. ~II Clty, AM, Sept 1973, 16. L.\bor relations for s an r t a t Lon

I CHI