75
Light chain deposition disease of the liver associated with AL-type amyloidojis and seveis &&stasis A case report Gavino
Faa’,
Boudewiin
Peter
Van
A 67-year-old man with a 3.month
Eyken’,
Rita
Renal
function
review
De Vos’.
Jan De Groote?
history of jaundice prrrented
mal liver tests with raised biliruhin.
vealed normal extrahepatic bile ducts. Liver globular deposits of PAS-positive
Van
Dammet,
and literature
Johan
and Valeer
with hcpatomegaly. Laboratory
was normal
Endoscopic
non-congophilir
and a typical bile infarct.
creased in the peririnusoidal posed of fibrils
indistinguishable
chain deposition
disease (LCDD)
disorder first described by Randall actuized
by the deposition
red-wpative
material.
chain antiserum ultrastruclore
in various
reactive
is a systemic
et al. in 1976 (1). charwith
organs of Congo monotypic
and lacking rhe characteristic
fibrdlar
9s both intact and fragmented
pnrtcd,
ligbr
manly
(5.1 I-!6) wntation
chronic
between LCDD
type is not entirely
and amyiotdosio of the
and the bver (2.22).
that thz depobitrd material in LCDD
light chain deposition (8), pulmonary
Recently,
however.
disease presentmg with skin lesions
nodules (9) and even with faral varculopa-
Liver
involvement
in LCUD
brillar
has been occasionally re-
wuctwe
go&able
exammalions
(U.24)
More-
have revealed
may also have a fi-
like amyloid. and may even be indiron-
From amyloid fib&
(21.25.26)
We now report on a paoent with combined LCDD AL-type ear
thy (10) has been reported.
cases
have been reported of an association of both diseases tovalving the kxdney (2.19-21) over, ultrastructural
acute or chronic onset (S-7).
disease
clear (9). In recent yeas,
(3). The disease is known to mainly affect the ktdney (4).
renal
(15.17.18).
The distmc:ion AL
in eublects with
and rarely as a .na,or feature m the clinical prr-
chains, while the amyloid P component was not detected
with
in-
are discussed.
light
of amyloid (2). The deposits have been re-
cently charactenzeo
appeared markedly
the deposited material in the Disre spacer was mamty cam-
from amyloid, admixed with small amounts of granular elecwon-dense material. The simv
larities of light chain deposition disease and AL amyloidosis
light
and
revealed the presence of d-light chain
and in the portal tracts. Collagens type I and I\’ and fibroneuin space. On electron microxopy,
re-
Lammar
matenal were observed a the sinusoIdal WBUF. In ad-
dition, congophilic material was detected in the portal tracts. bmnunohtstochem~stry deposits both in the xnusoids
studtes revealed abnor-
retrograde Fholangiopancreatography
biopsy showed ~evrre bilirubinostasis
diastase-resistant
Fevery*, J. Desmet’
smylnidosis
presenting with cholc~atnc liar
A liver biopsy bbowrd wverr
Infarct.
and dir-
chulcatasis with a bile
76
C8SE
report
dilion
improved
mouths
markedly.
However.
after prcscntation.
when last seen, 6
protrinuria
(1.7 g/24 h) be-
cane appsrcnt. A 6%war-old
mate wns referred
dye to progressive
puinlcas jnundwz.
Five years earlier,
he hnd experienced
n myoocardiut infarction.
At thui lime hypcrchotcstcrol:-
mia (350 mg/dl) and mild late-onset diabetes meltitus
had
hcen discovered and treated with an appropriate diet. On odmasion.
he was markedly jaundiced. Cardiopul-
monary and \~~scuIur cxemination
was Norman The liver
Methods The liver needle hiopqy was divided into three fragments
for lig!~t microscopic,
ultrastructu~al
study.
immunohietochemical
A fragment
drated and paraffin embedded. Five micron thick sections were stained with hematoxylin
and eosin. periodic acid
u’as enlarged to 7 cm below the costal margin. The spleen
Schiff (PAS)
wus not pulpuble. hut slightly
Perl’s prussian blue, Congo red with and without
enlarged lymphnodes were
present m ttte cervical. sxillary laboratory
and inguinal
results arc summarized
to Ihe fe8:wcs
in Table
of marked cholcstosP
areas. The
I. In addition
u mild anemia. hy-
after diastase digestion.
pretreatment
and Hall’s
bilirubin
sections were also stained with and I-light
chains (Dako).
poalbumincm!a and a small M peah in the y-globulin frac-
frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled this
rcvmisd
~8s normal.
bcparomegz!y:
mu seemed normal and the bile dur:s Cho!rcystolithiasi\ (CT)
was presrst.
Uttrasour.d
!he liver parenchy were not dilated.
Computed
rcvcalcd alightly enlargr 1 l?mphnodes
in the hitum
antisera
beiwern
the aorta and cavat vein,
liniment
and in the media&mm.
IC retrograde chalangiopallcreatography ruther fiue intrshepa!ic
in the
Endoscop-
(ERCP)
showed
bile ducts, with a normal :ommou
bile duct and main psncreabc duct. Bone marrow
examination
6” immunncytoma
IgD
KMnO,
Deparatfinized
antibodies
to K- (Dako)
isopentane.
III
Dickinson).
(Chemicon)
fDako).
Five micron
(Dako),
Protein
IgG (Becton
(Da~o).
IgA
(Dako).
!3ickinson)
an4 with
JgM (iLko),
and Amyloid
A
The third part of the specimen WBS fixed
in 2.5%
glutaraldehyde
troxide.
Ultrathin
l06A
(Eurodiagnostics),
(El-*..,disgnos!ics)
specific for human
to K-
collagen type I
and IV
taminin
and postfixed
in 1% osmium
sections were counterstained
nyl acetate and lead L.tmie
revealed a lymphopkama-
cylobis of 35% (control below 25%)
chains (Becton
(Chemicon), iibronectin
of the liwr.
stain.
red, reticulin,
cryostat sections were stained with antibodies
and I-light
tomogrqhy
gostrohcpatir
Sirius
Part of the biopsy wm snap-
tion were noted. Renal function exsmmation
and
was fixed in 85. dehy-
tnnsmission
te-
with urn-
and examineC with
a Zeiss
ele*‘ron microscope.
and the presence of
was suspected. An axillary lymph node
was cxciscd and a liv:?r biopsy taken. chemotherapy,
the patient
WC treated with 32 mg mc~bylprcdnisolone.
Before
eventually
starting
decreasing
to !2 mg. Jaundice subsided and rhe patient’s general con-
The
lobular
nrchitectorc
was preserved.
appeared enlarged and somewhat to peripheral
fibrous
extensions.
irregular
Portal
tracts
in shape due
In the periphery
portal areas, ductular proliferation
of the
and ductular metapla-
sia of hepatocyies was observed. There was a mild degree
oicholangiolitis and even ductular cholestasis.The parenchyw
showed severe cholestasis,
atoceltular.
characterized by hep-
canalicular and Kupffer
In addition,
a periportat
the periphery
crotic hepatucyws,
cell bilirubinostasis.
bite infarct,
and central bilintbin
with foamy cells at impregnation
was dctccted (Fig.
of ne-
1). The sinusoidal
wails appeared thickened due to the deposition of an eosinophilic The
homogcneow
deposits
uutterial
were both
evenly distributed
iinca:
throughout
rial WBE PAS-positive
in the spices of Disse. and globular
and were
all acinar zones. The mate-
after d&tare
digestion,
congophilic and did not exhibit bwefringence.
but not
Lo the por-
tal tracts, Congo red-positive
deposits,
tam to KMnO,
and were birefrigent,
werr
wall and in the comxctwe
tissue
pretreatment
present iu the arterial
which were r&s-
LCDD
Fig.
AND AMYLOIUOSK
2
WI’H
CHOLESTASIS
71
78
(Fig. 2). ln wmc nrcas. tt mild dcgrcc of sinusoidal pcri-
hihited a strong perisinusoidal
cellularf~brns~sw.lz
ing fx AA protein was negative.
nlsoahscrved.
The hiatologicnl study of the lyepn deporitton
node revealed the
of nhundnnt homogeneous
cosinophilic
rial. ill the sinuses and in the arterial were strongly PASpositive refring
mate-
wall. The deposits
and Congo red-negative.
nt material was found m ths dttrrial
In the lymph
node,
and portal staining. Stain-
the deposited
strongly with anti.,? antiserum.
material
reacted
No significant staining was
ohservrd with anti-K antiserum.
Bi-
wall on’y. On electron microscopy.
large globular
deposits were
found in :he space of Dissc (Fig. 4). They were composed lmmunohistochemical yielded comparable tions.
lncuhntion
staining
for
K-
results on paraffin with
anti-l.
and
i-chains
and cryostat sec-
light chain
antiserum
re-
of randomly
oriented
unhranched.
usually straight
about
filaments.
10 nm itt diameter
forming
or slightly
(Fig.
granular
walls (Fig. 3). A slight staining was found in the cannec-
the portal tracts,the same fihrillar
live tissue of the portal tracts and in the wall of the hepatic
Disse spaces was observed.
artery.
were lying in a nmre pnrallel orier.tarton.
Sections stained
with
anti-x
light
chain
rum showed nu specific staining. lmmunostaining munoglohulins I and IV
spaces of Disrr
was found on some collagen fibers, In material as found in the
The fibrils were longer and
for im-
revealed a strong positivity for IgM in the
sinusoidal ws!!s: I@, Type
ontise-
of
5). Fine electron-dense
sulted in an intense staining of deposits in the sinusoidal
nnterial
a meshwork
bent structures
IgA
rolkgcns
and IgD
were not detected.
were diffusely
positive
in the
ar well as in the portal areas. Immunore-
Liver
involvement
in light
chain
deposition
disease
aclivity for type 111collagen snd laminin was comparable
osuatiy orcurs in association with renal lesions and is only
to the pattern
rarely a major
observed m normal
liver. Fibronectin
ex-
feature
of the clinical presentation.
The
case reported
here differs from previous observatmns
in
that, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first observadon of LCDD presenting with jaundice and severe cholestasis, in the absena of clinical and laboratory evidence oiswious kidney invoivemenr. The histological picrure WIS quite unusual. In addition !o the typical features of LCDD, severe hepa!nrellular,
canabc~lar
and Kupffer 41 bdirubi~.~x~stas~s;and a typical
bllr infarc! wre observed. Bile infarct, or Cbarcot-Gombault necrosis. is considered ~;-aally diagnostic for extrabrpatic -b&stasis (27). However. in our patient the absenw ot any ewdcnce of eatrahepatic hdiary obrrruction confirms occasional observations (27) that typical bdc infarcts may be observed in inrrahepatic cholentasi?. The
cause of the sewrc cholestasis in our patient was not readily apparent. In amyloidosis. occur in 510% hepatic
~
(30-38).
of subjects
cholestaris
,
in which mild jaundice may
has
(28.29)
and severe intra-
occasionally
beat
reported
_”
it has been sueeested that bilirubinostasis
could
In adslitmn to light chain deposits along the sinusoids, our patient also had amyloid deposition in the portal tracts and combined
LCDD
nodes. Recently amyloidosis
and amyloidosis
the association
in the
of LUDD
the liver
portal deposits (38.39).
finding was not confirmed in
pathophysiology
amyloidosis
nostic feature is the presence of a single light chain isotype
other reports
of chotzstatic
loid had a pericentral
localization
(40).
where the amyIn the present
in the deposited
case. light chain deposits were preferentially
located in-
confirmed
side the lobule
only small
LCDD
in the Disse
spaces. while
amounts of congophitic amyloid material portal trots.
were found in
mainly in the hepatic artery watt and never
These
and in
be caused by the compression 01 tntrel~epatic bile ducts by This
(Z&22).
lymph
and AL-type
WBS reported in the kidney (2.19-21) cases suggest similarities
material.
Similarity
by the finding
deposits
in the
of both diseases, whose common diag-
that,
menfed tight chains (3).
has been recently
similar
are derived fmm
to AL
amyloid,
both intact and frag-
In the present case, the ultra-
structural
in close association with bilz ducts. The pathogenesis of
finding of fib:iltar deposits which were indistinguishable from amyi& fib&, further underscorer simi-
the cholestasir thus remains unclear.
laaities betwcen AL-amyloidosis
The
sinusoidal
deposits were not only reactive for .I-
light chains. but were also positive reactivity
of the deposits with
for IgM.
Significant
anti-heavy chain antisera
has occasionally heen reported (1.2.17.23.41)
It has been
tion disesse as previously The different
and light chain deposi-
suggested (26).
distribution
of amyloid and non-amylai-
dotic material in the liver, i.e., light chain deposits in the sinusoids
and smyloid
in the portal tracts, indicates that
suggested that. in these cases, the term light chain depomi-
local factors may be inzortant
lion disease should be wplaced by ‘light and heavy chain
which light chains are being deposited: as light chain de-
deposition discare’ (41). The observation brow
type I and ty+ sinusoidal position
IV
collagen and for fihronectin
wall confirms
previous
in the
disease (13,16).
of the sinusoidal
cats aid ruggeu tnat ai, iiltcraLti.o,, cells and me dcposnru
for
reports of collagen de-
m hepatic light chain deposition
These dais mdicate an actiwtion
kreni
of sinusoidal fi-
and sf B markedly increased immunoreactivity
lining
betwee,, the rebiden,
hght chams cuutd rxptam the dif
r,?orphological appcamncc of light chain deposits in
the l&r.
as in other organs (42).
in determining
the form in
position disease deposits or as amyloid (43). The different patterns
of PAS
positivity.
fringertce and ultrasttuctural
Congo red posilivity,
phasized
by numerous
Congo red-negative
recent
Slomerulx
suggest rhat these varisotc
biie-
granular and/or fibrillar
pearance of deposits in light chain deposition reports deposits
feawres
ap
dtsease, em-
of amyloid-like (25.26,4&!7),
could represent
dif-
ferent stages in the deposition of tight chains. Apparently, there is a spectrum ranging from easily recognized Congo red-negative granular
deposits to Congo red-positive
ti-
LCDD
AND AMYLDlDOSlS
brillar material.
Wll”
Perhaps au, case represents an mterme-
dlafe stage in the transifwn dixase
Xl
C”O!_EST*S,S
10 AL-type
The autbws
It appears from this report that li@, disease should be considered
Acknow!edgements
from light chain depositmn
amyioidoris. chain deposirion
in the differential
diagnosis
ca! asis,a”cc
gra,efully
acknowledge
of Ria Gillard.
for ,be prepvrvtinn of the micrographs.
possible extrabrpatie
chtilnce uf Marja”
hiliary obctmction.
afie light chain deposition sis (20.22).
Finillly,
rbe case
cases of combined bep-
disease and AL-,ypc
amyloido-
indicate rhat both diseases may represent ,wo
extremes of a spectrum.
6 cnnfalonicri R, B.rbia&di Belgiolosa G. Badi G, et a,. Qhl chain“ephropatby: bisrologicsl and clinical sspccts in IS w~eb. Nsphrol DialTranspk?“, L988;I 150-6. 7 “enkacarcrba” YS, Fala&“O T. Hughron MD. Bucbulald D, Oleanicky L. Goldrier” MH. Marpbalo& varia”6 af bgb, ehai” depositian diseasein rbc kidney. Am J Nepbml 19.58:8: 272-9 8 Mawy CPJ, -rep&w AM. Massive NIa”IIZO”, byatinoris. Am J Cli” Patho, ,984: 81: 543-5,. 9 Kijner CH, Yourem SY. Syslcmiclight chain deparitia” disease ,neren,iw. aI “l”bi8,S D”l”m”an nodules. Am J Sure Paillo!
i9m:n405-13.
IO Srone GC. Wall BA. Oppliger IR, et a’. A vanculopxbywith depxirion of lambda light chain ws,als. A”” I”, Med 1989: 110: 175-8. 1, Ganevs, D. Noel L”. Droz D, Leibowitcb J. Sys,c”“c lambda light chain dep&,io” in a palie”, wb my&ma. Br Med J ,981: 182: 681-3. 12 Case records Of ,hP Ma.rrrcbure,,s Orncra, “o,p,tal. Carr 1. 19111.N Engl J Med ,981: 301: 33-40. 13 Dra D, Noel L‘i, Cxnot F, DeSur F. Ganeval D, Grunfeld JP. Liver ln”ol”eme.nrill i.J”all”,“id beh, ihhl” lIeDmill deeale Lab invest 1984: 1‘0: 683-9. . 14 Le “eiger JL, Toule, R, Deug”er Y. Ra,“rr MP. A”om”,ir\ biologiqvcr bepa,lq”cr a” cows d‘une m&die der qJ,r de cbatncr Q&lea. Cast:~en,cro, Cli” ma, 198.5:9: 184-91. !5 “aff”lan.G”ilai”e C, Nocby D. facquot C. et a,. !_a mriad~r der iqi”,Z di c:l.meE,egcra- J”Scm,,? a”.,omopa,ba,“gique. A”” Parho, ,984: 4: w-13 55 Bcdoaa P. Fabre. M. Z’amf F, Martin E. irmaagre G. L,gh, chain deporiri”” disease wil.1 Iivcr dyrfwctio”. Hum P&s! ,988; 19: 3008-34
”
Aarscho,
VeulemanrWeckx
is gratefully acknowledged. Onderzoek’.
Roos
The xcrerw and Mariene
al asVan
Peter Van Eyktn
;I rewearch aes~sinn, of the Belgian ‘Nrtionaal Wrfrnrchappeli,k
techni-
Smets and Chns-
tel Van den Rrocck. They also thank Michel
of severe cholestasis even when hver hisrology suggests a presented hem and two pm:wus
the expx,
Bernadette
is
Fends vow
43 44
45 46 47