Vol. 49, No. 2,1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
LIGHT DEPENDENT FORMATION OF 6-AMINOLEVULLNIC
ACID IN ETLOLATED LEAVES
OF HIGHER PLANTS
E. HABBLand S. KLEIN
Department of Received
Botany, The Hebrew University,
August
JemrsaZem,Israel
24,1972
SUMMARY Levulinic acid inhibited the synthesis of chlorophyll and caused accumulation of &sminolevulinic acid in greening etiolated leaves of corn and bean seedlings. This is the first direct evidence for the No stoichiometric synthesis of 6-aminolevulinic acid in higher plants. relationship was found between the inhibion of cholorophyll synthesis and d-aminolevulinic acid accumulation. The formation of 8-aminolevulinic acid was light dependent and the rate of its formation increased after an initial lag period of 2-4 hours. Aminolevulinic
acid synthetase participates
phyll in photosynthetic succinyl-CoA and glycine
bacteria by catalyzing 111.
in the synthesis of chlorothe formation of ALA from
It has been suggested that in algae and higher
plants also, ALA is an intermediate
in the biosynthesis of chlorophyll
The production of ALA in algae has only recently Beale 143 showed that light of LA, a competitive
f2,3].
been demonstrated directly.
grown ChloreZZa cells excrete ALA in the presence
inhibitor
of ALA dehydratase [S].
A similar
situation
exists in Eughna, where ALA accumulates in greening cells in the presence of LA [6].
So far,
no direct
evidence is available
in higher plants as part of the biosynthetic
for the synthesis of ALA
pathway leading to chlorophyll.
In this communication we shall show that in higher plants LA inhibits
chloro-
phyll synthesis as in Ch~orella and Euglena, and that ALA accumulates under these conditions.
Abbreviations:
ALA - 6- aminolevulinic 364
Copyright 0 1972 by Academic Press, Inc. AI1 rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
acid; LA - levulinic
acid.
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 49, No. 2,1972
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNtCATIONS
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Corn
(Zea
bulgarian)
seeds
The primary green
leaves
flasks
were
the
the leaves
were
at 10,000
1 M Na acetate
For (Sigma),
g for
15 min.
concentrated
according
paper
[9]
acid
and on silica
acetylacetone,
gel
from
leaves
with
Levulinic
acid
(grade
I,
80% acetone Sigma)
corn
various
and pestle,
of 4% and the extract
extracts
centri-
to pH 4.6 with and Granick
or commercially
[8].
obtained
with
[7].
obtained
ethylacetate
The ALA-pyrrole
and (2-methyl-
was chromatographed Germany)
and determined
was purified
After
in small
After
a mortar
to Mauzerall
(M. Voelm,
a
of white
of solutions.
extracted
thus
at 22'.
under
cut bases
was brought
and Elliot
plates
80 ft.c.
with
var.
at pH 6.0.
their
water
the leaf
pyrrole)
extracted
uptake
according
to Irving
3-acetyl-4-propionic
with
The supernatant
ALA from with
stood
collected
from 8-9 day old
concentration
and ALA determined
was condensed
Leaves
in ice-cold
to a final
were
with
vuzga.ris, in the dark
solutions
the dark. but
ground
chromatography,
in vermiculite
illuminated
to accelerate
CClsCOOH was added
fuged
were in
(Phaseozus
bean seedlings
similarly,
of a fan
and bean
on the appropriate
leaves
treated
170)
and grown
day old
or remained
in front
periods
germinated
and floated
light
seedlings
Neve Yaar
of 9-10
in the dark
fluorescent
cold
were
safe-light
2 hours
var.
mugs,
[8].
on
Chlorophyll
was
spectrophotometrically.
as described
by Beale
[4].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Levulinic
acid
of ALA when added In the dark known
only
to enhance
inhibited to etiolated
traces
chlorophyll corn
synthesis
and bean leaves
of ALA accumulated.
chlorophyll
synthesis
exposed
In the presence
in the bean
365
and caused
[lo],
accumulation
to light
(Table
of sucrose,
more ALA accumulated
1).
Vol. 49, No. 2,1972
BIOCHEMICAL
The effect acid (ALA)
TABLE 1.
of levulinic in greening
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMJNKATIONS
acid (LA) on the formation of &aminolevulinic leaves of corn and bean seedlings
Corn Treatment
Water,
light
LA, light Sucrose, Sucrose Water,
light + LA, light dark
LA, dark Sucrose, Sucrose
Bean
ALA nmolelg
dark + LA, dark
Chlorophyll IJPiP
ALA wAef g
Chlorophyll !-dg
0.04
zk 0.03
318 k 35
0.44
f 0.17
60 f 11
7.62
f 0.22
184 f 19
5.40
f 1.00
32+
7
0.08
f 0.05
239 f 25
1.08
f 0.20
187 t 22
4.66
f 0.55
163 f 24
8.78
f 1.50
76 + 12
0.13
f 0.03
14*+
3
0.25
?: 0.24
16*f
0.15
-i 0.04
7+
2
0.50
f 0.50
0.12
f 0.05
0.36
f 0.01
20* 9k
4 3
0.00 0.00
1
*Protochlorophyll(ide) Duration levulinic Results
than
corn - 22 hours; bean - 18 hours. Concentration of of experiments: acid: 20 mM for corn; 15 mM for bean. Sucrose concentration 0.2 M. are given per g fresh weight as mean and standard error of 4-6 experiments.
in its
In corn,
absence.
and less
ALA was formed
compared
with
Figure tion
leaves
chromatograms
-were
from commercial
in
leaf
The Rf values
the leaf
leaves given
for
However, extracts.
and a decrease
was identified
with
no indications
with
synthesis
LA and sucrose
as
of LA on the forma-
the concentration
the pyrrole
can interfere
treated
chlorophyll
concentrations
Increasing
identical
This
were
of various
extracts
inhibited
LA alone.
those
by thin
obtained
to values with were
layer
layer for
reported
found
for
synthesis.
chromato-
and 0.2 on paper prepared
in the literature determination
the presence
by ion-exchange
50 mM
and paper
the pyrrole
the calorimetric
was established
366
of LA up-to in chlorophyll
- 0.5 on thin
ALA and corresponded
Aminoketones
ALA [7].
were
slightly
in ALA accumulation
The ALA in the
[8,91.
which
and ALA.
an increase
graphy -
when the
1 shows the effect
of chlorophyll
caused
sucrose
of
of aminoketones chromatography
191,
Vol. 49, No. 2,1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Fig. 1. The effect of various concentrations of levulinic acid on the formation of 6-aminolevulinic acid and chlorophyll in greening corn leaves. Etiolated 8 day old leaves were treated with levulinic acid for 2 hours in the dark and a following period of 22 hours in light.
thin
layer
and paper
of Granick
[ill.
chromatography
Evidently,
due to the presence
Small which that
amounts
the leaves found
synthesized
in either
bean
and corn
leaves
difference
ring
were
that
(Table
matched
or corn.
8 molecules
to that
detected
method
the Ehrlich
reagent
in the LA containing
media
on
to lo-15%
of
143 reported
that
the difference
and absence this
5-10
of LA.
between
was
of ALA are required
than
in the
the amount
of chlorophyll
the conditions
relationship
higher
treated
in ChloreZZa
Under
of ALA found
times
amounted
in amounts
stoichiometric
The amount
was always
course
with
The ALA in the media Beale
experiments
1, Fig.
also
floated.
in chlorophyll
The time similar
of ALA were
exactly
our
formed
calorimetric
of ALA-pyrrole.
in the presence
ing during
account
the product
in the extracts.
of ALA excreted
and by the modified
prevail-
does not extracts
of both
that
expected
from
and untreated
leaves,
taking
for
the formation
occur bean
the into
of a tetrapyrrole
1). of ALA accumulation
of chlorophyll
accumulation
361
in corn
leaves
in untreated
treated leaves
with
LA is
(Fig.
2).
Vol. 49, No. 2, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
Fig. 2. The effect chlorophyll in greening o light, water X dark, water
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of levulinic acid on the accumulation corn leaves. s light, 20 mM levulinic acid + dark, 20 mM levulinic acid
of ALA and
6-
4 4 10
hours
Fig. 3. The accumulation of ALA in corn leaves in the dark after illumination for 5 hours. 0 control: leaves treated with 20 mM levulinic acid in continuous light. s same treatment but leaves were returned to darkness after 5 hours in light.
366
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 49, No. 2, 1972
TABLE 2.
The effect of succinate and glycine greening corn leaves in the presence
levulinic
acid
0.05
M glycine
0.05
M glycine
0.05
M succinate
0.05
M succinate
(LA) + LA + LA
*
Mean and standard
When leaves
were
accumulation
error
returned
ceased
within
ALA synthetase
0.03
* 0.02
7.35
t 0.23
0.04
0.02
0.00
1.72
4.95
11.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.88
6.10
10.94
2-3 hours
that
has yet
no proof
The direct plants formation phyll is this
light
dependent
suggestion.
on ALA
that
formation
This
f 0.48
in tissues comprise
process
(Table
the that
is
from
and related The parallel indicates
continuous
first
direct
higher
plant
to light.
plants
and
observation tissues
produce
by ALA synthetase.
of ALA accumulation
that
in corn
[13,14].
[2,12]
The finding
to a decrease
369
in higher
ALA increases
and accelerates that
synthesis
on chlorophyll
two processes
the chloro-
ALA accumulation
in chlorophyll
of sucrose these
of chlorophyll
exogenous
in the dark
that
cessation
leaves
of higher
catalyzed
the
ALA
2).
observations
effect
to light,
resembles
too requires
The finding this
exposure
of illuminated
of ALA in the synthesis
in the light
also
3).
by the enhancement
and glycine
involvement
here
of protochlorophyll(ide)
production
(Fig.
upon transfer
reported
suggested
has been deduced
5 hours
to be detected
ALA is
by succinate
after
ALA accumulation
in such tissues.
leaves
f 0.98
of 3 experiments
of ALA synthesis
is
light
0.03
the data
however,
22 hrs
4.51
to our knowledge
in itself
weighi
1.36
synthesis
and indicates
of ALA in acid.
0.00
to the dark
of protochlorophyll(ide)
This,
ALA/ g fresh 13 hrs light
5 hrs light
Water
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
on the accumulation of 20 mM levulinic
umole
Treatment
darkness
AND BlOPHYSlCAt
supports
synthesis
are related.
and The
Vol. 49, No. 2, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS L
lack
of stoichiometry
synthesis system
between
in the presence from a tightly
the low intensity chlorophyll
ALA formation
of chlorophyll
of LA may be due to the release
coupled
of light
accumulation
and inhibition
control
mechanism,
used in our
It
experiments
and the formation
of the ALA producing
may also
to avoid
of ALA might
be related
bleaching
to since
have different
light
requirements.
It
has been
the metabolic a light
phyll
control
dependent
approach
suggested
the
of chlorophyll
formation
more directly
that
of AU
problems
formation
of ALA plays
biosynthesis in higher
concerning
[2,3].
plants the
a central
in
The demonstration
makes it
control
role
possible
mechanisms
to
of chloro-
synthesis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS for
We wish technical
to thank Mrs. assistance.
E. Neeman, Mrs.
H. Barenholz
and Mr.
M. Guy
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.
KIKUCHI, G., KUMER, A., TALMAGE, P. and SHEMIN, D., J. BioZ. Chem., 233, 1214 (1958). GRANICK, S., Proc. 5th Int. Cong. Biochem., 6, 176 (J.961). BOGORAD, L., In: "The Chlorophylls", VERNON, L.E. and SEELY, G.R. (eds.), p. 481. Academic Press, 1966. BEALE, S.I., Plant Physioz., 45, 504 (1970). NANDI, D.L. and SHEMIN, D., J. BioZ. Chem., 243, 1236 (1968). BRAULT, P., SCHIFF, J.A. and KLEIN, S., manuscript in preparation. MAIJZERALL, D. and GRANICK, S., J. BioZ. Chem., 219, 435 (1956). IRVING, E.A. and ELLIOT, W.H., J. BioZ. Chem., 244, 60 (1969). DRATA, S. and GRANICK, S., J. BioZ. Chem., 238, 811 (1963). WOLFF, J.B. and PRICE, L., J. BioZ. Chem.,235, 1603 (1960). GRANICK, S., J. Bio-l. Chem., 241, 1359 (1966). KLEIN, S. and BOGORAD, L., J. Cell Biol., 22, 443 (1964). SISLER, E.C. and KLEIN, W.H., Physioz. Plant., 16, 315 (1963). NADLER, K. and GRANICK, S., P&nt Physiol., 46, 240 (1970).
370
of