377
Journal of Molecular Structure, 45 (1978)377-387 0 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
LINE
WIDTH
AND
S. NIKITINE,
S.G.
Laboratoire (sssoci& rue
5,
EXCITON-IMPURITY
de au
de
ELKOMOSS
SCATTERING
and
Spectroscopic
C.N.R.S.
no
C.
et
IN
Cu20
SCHWAB
d'optique
du
Corps
232),
Universite
Louis
67000
Strasbourg
(France)
l'tlniversitg,
Solide
Pasteur,
ABSTRACT The
variation
series nal to
Ag
in +
the
the
of
Cu20
ions
as (ref.
must
1) is
acquire
increases.
This
component
Lorentzian of
the
and
the
line
line
line
0 = 1014 Further
of
excitons
cm2
and
can
R = 3.2
discussion
of
in
with
results
leads
Ag+
N.
of
cm-l
The
a shape
concentrations
N
good
cross-section
to
that
convolution
= 0.57
be calculated. The obtained -5 10 cm for a concentration
these
shown of
surprinsingly
a collision
similar
is
t," N + 0) and
different
is
It
the
Av
variable
calculated
substitutio-
a theory
from
width
for
comparison
yellow
concentration
AWL
lines
path
the
the
N of of
lines
theoretical this
when
of
theory.
width
1)
From
ground
extrapolation
(ref.
the
on
line
by
1 line
concentration
is obtained
a constant
of
n =
broadening
shape
experiment
component
the
the
interpreted
shape of
of
experimental
agreement. free
of
a Voigt
Voigt
from
width
collision
a Gaussian (obtained
line
a function
Lorentzian
line
the
and
mean
values
are 18 cm-3 N = 10 I information.
useful
INTRODUCTION The been
width
of
studied
the
The
choice
forbidden
a)
Ag
of
1S line very
impurity
the
yellow
carefully
concentration
exciton
both (ref.
as
series
has
a function
1) and
of
of
temperature
2).
width
residual that
50 K or
of
this
quadrupole
the
tures, and
1,
experimentally
substitutional (ref.
n =
the
so,
line
transition
of
the
strains
in
width
is particularly
of
line the the
and
is very
depends crystal
line
favourable.
on
the
only.
varies
narrow.
The At
low
concentration
It has
slightly
been with
line
is
a
temperaof
shown
impurities :
temperature
below
378 b)
that
width
in
a systematic
It has been
lattice
the
tions. the
Ag+
analogy
The
line
Toyozawa's being The
of
of width
(ref.
substituted
some
dispersion
in
AwR
figure
AgZO
sites
this
3)
interband
of in
Cu the
line +
not
affect
the
line
Ag
not
width is
than Auls
are not substituted
lattice
the the
with
higher
suggested
J;lO concenrrorion
points. to
zero.
that
I
400 (ppm)
of the 1s absorption concentration.
this
account
exciton
on terms
1 level.
linear tends
This
of
CuzO.
concentration
It
in
in disloca-
substantially
n =
approximately
N tends
of
depend
scattering,
1
200
Fig. 1. Variation of the Ag impurity
do
rather located + in Cu sites on
the
does
energy
sites
been
are
located
experimental
as conclntration 1. It has
Ca
impurities
with
1s line
higher the
of
Si,
but
to be lattice
of
considerably
variation
Cu"
likely
the
Mg,
that these
on
is very
like
way.
suggested
of Cu20
ions
width
impurities
other
of
in to
Ag+
spite
of
a residual
variation
extrapolated
is
shown
width
10
line
width
in CuzO
as
function
379
corresponds As
the
predominantly
impurity
Lorentzian The the
of
1s line
ning atoms. line
In
The
paper
with by
lines
is
concentration
this
way
of
shape
increases
by
our
due
the
scattering we
on
of
The
ambiguous
as no
calculations velocity
is
of
of
of
the
(ref.
line
2)
of
the
develops
an
then
the
line.
rather
a
this
for
between
these
neutral
gas of
the
these
lines c of
of
excitons
somewhat
is known.
velocities.
limit
in
impurities.
velocity
problem
of
broade-
cross-section
is however
two
explained
1) on
velocity the
width
component
the
extreme
be
neutral
(ref.
collision
the
Lorentz
provided
of
two
on
of
on
Lorentzian
experiments
effective
of
atoms
1 excitons
n =
treatment
given
theories
considered
that
of
theoretical
included
the
the
the variation + Ag in Cu20 can
atomic
impurities,
determination
are
of of
previous
isoelectric
is known.
show.that
suggest
scattering
a determination
excitons
to
concentration
theory
to
is
a transposition
interpretation
allows
a Gaussian
shape.
aim
a simple
to
The
The
actual
cases.
THEORY In the one
has
’ a) AVR b)
transposition to make
the is
the
residual
as
of
of
line
a Gaussian
c) charge dered
a function
the
of
substitution
distribution as
a neutral
responsible increases. suggested
for The
has
be
the
of
and
shape
with
AvR
impurity. broadening
scattering
of
the
and
of
Voigt
excitons
,
therefore
a width
from
the
component. line.
independent,
The
the
Let first
second
not change the + has to be consiAg
component
is
alone
line on
deformation
= AuG
shaped
Lorentzian
the
has
resulting
concentration of Ag+ , + + site does in a Cu
the
shape
a Lorentzian
a Ag
So
to
one
this
to excitons,
:
concentration
lattice
due
collisions
Gaussian
a Voigt
in the
the
to be
Gaussian
width
of
of
assumptions
component
be the experimental *%i component is supposed to is only
theory
predominantly
a pure
experimental
convolution
Lorentz
following
line
considered
the
of
Ag+ as concentration N + substitutional atoms Ag
of
the
lattice
of
a spectral
around
the
is Ag+
ion. It
is well
collision
known
gives
that
the
the
1) the
line
is broadened
2)
the
line
becomes
3) the
line
is
values
of N.
broadening
following
effects
(Lorentz
with
increasing
line
due
to
concentration
broadening),
asymmetric,
shifted
with
respect
to
its
position
at very
small
:
380 The An
first
effect
asymmetry
negative result
of
nent the
Lorentz
of
AvV.
line
The
(in cm-')
width
at the
experimental
and
the
top
AU
the of
shape
experimental
AvG
third
effect
measurements.
= AvR
been
considered
= 0.57
line
value
and
line,
of Avis.
variable
for
different
The
Voigt
shape
the
absorption
Avv
have
has
not
been
a Gaussian
cm -1 determined
now
and
AvV
value
from
a Lorentzian line
has
a
coefficient
to be value
concentrations line
a
compo-
measured
A given
or
as being
of
to N + 0,
the
positive
be
The resultant Voigt shape L' value of Kmax, the absorption the
accuracy.
It can only -1 0.25 cm .
than
a convolution
value
of
the
a reliable
it has
be
is smaller
a AWL formula
as
extrapolated
the of
our of
width
width
shape,
the
result
line line
but
Finally, it
a constant
with
it cannot
if it exists, is the
observed
observed,
samples, of
shape
component
been
been
accuracy
experimental
width
has
collisions. the
that
line of
has
different
within
concluded The
also
for
observed
only
compared
with
of Kmax(lS) corresponds
N.
is given
by
the
following
of
the
Gaussian
: eJ 2 dy
a2+(w-y) with
the
K
G max component.
following is the
Avn+AvL
notations.
absorption
coefficient
at the
top
_ v
a=
Iln2
AvG
(2)
2(v-vo) W=
\/Rn2 AVG
is the natural Avn -1 exciton in cm .
THE
COLLISION
If Av, shape the This
lJ=LI
a:d
line
CROSS-SECTION
is determined the
Gffective is given c Au-
_
N
v
width
from
experimental cross by
the
section formula
and
v o is the
eigen
frequency
of
the
(3 the one,
comparison
of
it is possible
(5 for
excitons
on
the to
theoretical calculate
neutral
line the
impurities.
:
(3)
to
381 of the excitons, Here c is the velocity of light, v is the velocity the impurity being supposed to be at rest. AvL is expressed in cm-' 2 can arise from the assumption and u is given in cm . some difficulty to be made i)
as
If one
the
=
the
assumes
exciton
VT
to
gas
value that
then
"T
ex
of
Boltzman (ref.
5,
masses, ii)
the
6) where
me
ion
Mex
106
in thermal
equilibrium
with
and
10
at T = 10 K (4)
6
atT=4K
supposed
is
to be
is expressed are
mh
excitons by
This
are
the
the
very
in gm;
Mex
effective
gives
created
optically
conservation
large.
= me
k is
the
f mh
electron
and
hole
of
with
momentum
a certain
of
the
velocity
photon
in the
:
nh
(5)
n is the photon
refractive
outside
the
index
known
that
10-11
set
thermal
electrons so when
energy
of
as
there
in
a very
of
this The
This
must
small
process
not
observed
thermalized
the
yellow
authors
series
ans
long
life
extent
time
damping
of
in this
remembered is based
on and
the
the
are
length
"cold".
of
It
is
to
the
in about
with
respect
phonons. a much
However slower
are
knowledge,
an
the
process,
available
only
accurate
theory
treated.
probably
lifetime
is very
wave
n = 2.49,
which
been
has
The
forbidden.
because
some
create
certainly
to have
i and
energy
of phonons,
not, seem
the
can
is
recently
the
a certain
are excess
measured
to
with
excitons
only
of
to be
The
been
account
collisions
To
number.
X the
VT.
and
excitons
crystal;
A = 6098
an
an absorption
of
malized It has
have
lattice
is a dipole
knowledge been
the
does
1s state line
they
of cold be
than
the
For
(and excitons)
or
thermalization
of
crystal.
= 2.105 cm set-l. ??Y -_This velocity is smaller
by
are
x"ex
Here
V
and
1.55
= 0.98
impurity
constant
is given
=-
ex
excitons
respectively.
crystal. V
the
However
which
the
=
“T
mass
v.
:
q
the
of
a long
of
this
luminescence weak.
1s state
of
It is the
life
line
this
likely
excitons
time.
has
to our
line
that
has
on
are
ther-
of
lines
case.
that
Lorentz
the
behaviour
phase
change
theory of
of broadening
a classical
induced
by
the
oscillator collisions
382
during
the
life
collisions
may
thennalization sical G,
time also of
of
the
representation
which
should
the
change
exciton the
be
oscillator the
is
in
treatment
can
be
of
vex
for
would our
the
best
we
that
have
WITH
with
tical
curve
every
sample
the
the
it can
be
values
component figure
1 and
tration. calculated the
tical
by
curve
It has a certain
have
to be
been
The are
on
on
in Table
above
clas-
velocity
explanation
Note
that
has
which
taking
treatment no
sens
value
velocities
of
vT
is
and
in the
vex-
same
fit
Av,
the
given
for
for
for
the
same
sample.
to probable some
this
errors of
I in which
and In
of
the
the
samples
the
values
of
values
mean of
have the
of
concencan
be
velocities
8 of
of our
we
and
the
theore-
Table of
I.
Avis
have
and
also
concentration
order
of
a Lorentizian
section
fitting
on
curve
possible
Therefore
accuracy
Gaussian
adjusting
sample
cross
sample
same
less
a
experimental
the
surpri-
extrapolation
samples
experimental the
of
N only.
each
the
is
somewhat
by
both
2 shows
of
of
for
for
acceptable.
effective
above
points that
the
theore-
relative
fitting
is
and
adjusted
convolution
all
with
samples
the
quite
is
The
points
this it
Kmax
Awv
samples
a AvL
obtained
is obtained
of
account
only
cm
and
which
-1
of
sample.
experimental
the
follows.
several
samples
still
Figure
for of
the
as value
every
concentration
best
AvL
for
AuG
from
the the
the
emphasized
lead
mean
a
that
which
The
for
for
= 0.57
experimEEta1
taken.
results
given
AvG
formula
on
so
this
mechanical
is performed AulS
as being
value
parts
the
sure
both
curves.
most
obtained
to be
dispersion
evaluations
samples
v Tandv.
and
in different
some
obtain
the
(5 for
with For
are
Auv
a value
exciton
to
not
a constant
sample. for
this
a certain
time and
In
is obvious
neglected
values
compared
depending
From
of
place.
a quantum
determined
N
considered
to
in
experiment
with
supposed
AuL
It
this
oscillator
consideration.
experimental
a breadth
in order AvV breadth Avis
of
then
of
of
component
the
the
impurity
Even
acquire
simply
values
calculated is
take
is theoretically
experimental of
to
equivalent
exciton are
the
EXPERIMENT
with
from
good.
The
it
corresponding
singly good
THE
comparison
concentrations
to
as
considered
is determined fitted
the
in
of
(3).
statistical
collisions
However
COMPARISON The
ground
velocity
mean
case.
on
will
formula
likely
exciton
taken
changes.During
velocity
values
of
AvL
determinationsand 10 %.
considered
oscillator
strength
a
383 TABLE
1
Calculated AvG
= 0.567
no of sample
values
fv,
of
AvL,
and
(J for
some
samples
N~10-l~
fvxlOg
AvI, in
ax1014
cm-l for
8
with
cm -1 .
v=vT
cm2 for
v=vex
I
1.3
1.91
0.4
0.942
4.99
10 I
1.6
1.77
0.51
0.976
5.17
10 II
1.6
2.00
0.77
1.473
7.8
3R6
3.25
2.26
1.09
1.027
5.44
65t 9'E "32-
Fig.
2. Calculated the
curve
data
of
-
Calculated
000
Experimental
with
AvG
1s absorption curve data
line
using of
cm -1
= 0.567 eq.
ref.
in Cu20 (1) 1.
and
experimental
for
the
sample
no
8.
384 f
is also
carried
given.
out
This
gives
collision
5.85
lo-l4
it has
factor
THE
of
2 or
1) It has of
increasing the
= the
INTERNAL shown
small
in direction very
pure
of
the
width on
been
necessarily
evaluated
the
shape
of
the
Further
on
it has
natural
line
magnitude
This
line
line
comparable exceptional a) same
the
sample
We
the
the
obtained Av
V
theoretical
for
a Lorentz for was
a
in the
Stronger by
stresses
Haken
(ref.
in strength shape
split 2) that
and
of
assumption
possibly
the
line
that
also
width.
yellow
applied
a component This
This
due
correction
correction
is predominent
is
in
crystals. AuR
is much should
larger be
is expected
than
several
for
the
tried
of the
the
orders
of
absorption
all
adjust
N the
other the
experimental
Gaussian
width
samples
of
theoretical
curve
component
crystals, of
a much
comparable
approximately curve
to
to
of this
:
other
of
concentration
as compared
component
samples
Voigt
the
1s line
have
shape
attempt as
1s line
contain
of a given
large
In a first
= AvR
is
is created.
ways
AvG
neutral atoms
Artificially
character
that
width
in two
introducing
resultant
to
=
for
spectrometer.
10 8 of
the
the
our
however
pure
sample
width
those
for
abnormally
curve
effective
with
diameter
Gaussian
of the
noted
Doppler
concentration.
shape
collision
random
the
Gaussian
in very
an exciton
is
a(~,,)
line.
at
of
about
which No
for
suggested
justifies
but
to be
In an'exceptional
the
Voigt
by
width
in which
2) of
to be
Gaussian
smaller.
i and
an
been ppm.
diameter.
of
the
distributed
responsible
line
and
stresses.
been
= AVG. The component AvR *"R to the limitedwidth of the slit has
100
cm*
atomic
atomic
can
not
has
10 to
101*
collision
broaden
It has
crystals.
curves
about
STRESSES
first
be
= 1.11
the
depends
stresses
can
from
= 21.05
the
that
crystals
experimental
;.
results
than
in a triplet.
residual
d(vT)
that
3 higher
been
o(vT)
48.37
noted
stresses
line
for
with
OF
Cu20
with varying
of
of
d(ve,)
to be
INFLUENCE
series
value
diameter
cm',
comparison
atoms
comparison
concentrations
a mean
mean In
The
for
did
the
same
not
fit
and
was
obtain
larger
width
concentration. as the
kept
to
of
the
a good A$
Though
fit
than the
it happens that 1s ' experimental points well. Av
385 b) same
In a second as
width,
The
Gaussian
obtain attempt
the
fit
1) of
broad tal
the
very
Gaussian
comparable
was
of
given
such
AvlS
theoretical
and
curve
was
given
a line
width
AuvW
In this
and
the
concentration.
the
as
to
second
experimental
attempt
line
of an
section
it
component
is
width
of
as the
abnormally to
:
considered
large
is tempted
indicates
~0110~s
sample
width
suggest
abnormally
Av&.
that
high
is due
Refering
this
abnormally
internal
acciden-
stresses.
ii)
This
= AvR
AVG
iii) the
renforces
The
lack
abnormal
THE
MEAN can
on
formula
:
g=l
success width
be
week of
of
the
this
BETWEEN
mean
obtained
impurities
TWO
the
first
residual
attempt
particular in the
path
from
the
between above
the
a)
with
crystals. indicates
crystal
is not
that
due
two
COLLISIONS
exciton-impurity of
free
CJ. For
path
colli-
collisions
is given
by
gives
The
second
mean
9. = 3.5 value
distance
THEORETICAL The charge
10
-5
VALUES
the
v = vT
to be more
impurities
OF THE of
for
excitons
on
II = 6.6
realistic
which
EXCITON
and
is of
as the
10
-6
for
v = vex.
compared
to
order
10 -6 cm .
of
the
IMPURITY
COLLISION
CROSS-SECTION
impurities
obviously
depends
on
the
impurity.
a) Kachlishvili
(ref.
for
interstitial
charged
his
calculation,
the
corrected.
cm
appears
between
scattering of
of
the
(6)
TNCJ
This
to
crystal.
values
mean
line
in purest
EXCITONS-IMPURITY
free
at rest
that tensions
concentration
PATH
of the
exciton
of
line
suggestion
residual
in the
FREE
A value sions
the
indicates
fluctuations
be
component
samples
between
two
large
component
Lorentzian
good.
of these
this
of
however
between
abnormally
a Gaussian
point
the
lines
agreement
to be
conclusion
i) The to
a good
happens
The
the
component
again
points
attempt
for
Applied
7) has
calculated
impurities.
electron-hole to
Cu20
with
collision
However exciton
this
cross-sections author
interaction
interstitial
Agf
neglects
which
ions
this
in
should theory
386
gives as
a cross-section
that
given
substitutional impurity. does
Ag+
seem
b) We have a neutral
tried
perturbation
CU'
ion.
the
ionic
is
the
lattice
rAg
apply
case
but
order
to a non
mentioned
our
above gives
this
only
to
charged 'theory
an order
of
scattering
of
an exciton
on
in this
situation can be due to c. ion is substituted to a an Ag
when
is due
Ag+,
same
not
correspond
a theory
scattering
: for
the
does
comparable.
The
perturbation
radii
difficulty
of such
perturbation
These
however
difficult To
which
is of
theory
to
the
+ = 1.13
considerable difference of + and for Cu , rCu+ = 0.96 :
i
8).
The the
This
which
which
to
to develop
of
cm2 this
correction
applicable
impurity.
the
lo-l4
in Cu20,
of the
to be
of a case
of magnitude
1.3
I. However
ions
So besides
not
(ref.
of
in Table
knowledge
be
considered
of
this
with
problem
a new from
this
other
problem
to find are
parameter
forms
problem
or
is
calculations.
been
solved
It is hoped
that
a partial
in another
of
on models. which
yet
be published
not
reliable
in progress
in the
experiments has
precautions.
will
is
Calculations
potential. introduce
to.evaluate
our
calculations
and
has
to
solution
paper.
CONCLUSIONS Considering tion
of the
of Cu20 sections Cu20
been
have
been
involves
A mean
free
evaluated
Finally Gaussian be
due
width
determined
path from
it has character
The
the
the
to a mean
stresses.
a
of
of
the
been
for
two
thermal
are
line
the
to be
two
pure due
cross-
impurity
of
and
series
realistic.
values
Lorentz
varia-
yellow
effective
VT has
residual
of very
of a broadening
the
absorbing
between
of the
the
a neutral
of
of the
considerations
of
on
extreme
of
surprisingly
value
character
that
treatment
1s line
velocity
exciton
shown
of the value
the
an exciton
changes
these
of
results
classical
phase
a classical
realistic
scattering
of
of AvlS
of N the that
in Cu20.
a consequence
been
shown
of the
exciton
which
simplicity and
as a function
It has
the
the shape
the
in
velocity
of
considered
line
width
as
theory
oscillator.
collisions appears line
has
to be width
crystals to residual
is
also
realistic.
AvR likely
and to
accidental
Schwab, A. Goltzene. a. Meyer and S. Nikitine, Phys. Stat. Sol., @al60 (1973) 651. 3.C. Merle, S. Nfkitine and H- Haken, Phys. Stat. Sol., (b161 (1974) 229Y. Tuyozawa, Progress in Theor. Phys., 20 (1958) 53. A.C.G. Mitchell and M.W. zemansky. Resanance Radiation and Excited Atoms, Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1973.. A. Goltzene, C. Schwab and H.C. Wolf, Solid State Corn., 3.0 (X976)1565. J-W. Hodby, T.E. Jankins, C!. Schwab, H. Tamura and D. Trivich, 3. Phys. c, 9 (1976) 1429. Z.S. KachlishviLi, Sov, Phys. Sol. State, 3 (1962) 1554. Handbook of Chem. and Phys., 35th ed. Edited by Ch. D. Hodgeman, by Chemical Rubber Publishing Co, Cleveland, Ohio, pubfished
C.
U.S.A.
(J.953).