- Email: [email protected]
Literature listing
World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
World Patent Information journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/worpatin
Literature listing 1. Books 1.1. Recent reports and other monographs World Intellectual Property Indicators e 2013 Edition, WIPO, http:// www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ipstats/en/wipi/2013/pdf/wipo_ pub_941_2013_highlights.pdf. Patents and Standards e A modern framework for IPR-based standardization, ECSIP Consortium, European Commission, 2014, http:// ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/4843/attachments/1/ translations/en/renditions/pdf. World Intellectual Property Report 2013 e Brands e Reputation and Image in the Global Marketplace, WIPO, http://www.wipo.int/ export/sites/www/freepublications/en/intproperty/944/wipo_ pub_944_2013.pdf. The European Patent e a European success story for innovation, European Patent Office, [2014], Pascal Griset. Securing the Future of Your IP Department: Protecting and Driving Value from Patents, Trademarks and Brands, 2014 eBook, Global IP Exchange, http://www.globalipexchange.co.uk/. IPR Jagoran, The Tezpur University IPR Cell newsletter, January 2014, http://www.tezu.ernet.in/tuipr_cell/newsletter/IP%20JAGO RON_TUIPR_2013_final_16%20jan%202014.pdf. The Informal Economy, Innovation and Intellectual Property e Concepts, Metrics and Policy Considerations, WIPO Economic Research Working Paper No. 10, 2013, de Beer J., Fu K., Wunsch-Vincent S, http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/econ_stat/en/economics/ pdf/wp10.pdf. Commercialising Public Research e New Trends and Strategies, OECD, 2013, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/ commercialising-public-research-new-trends-and-strategies_ 9789264193321-en. National Intellectual Property Systems, Innovation and Economic Development with perspectives on Colombia and Indonesia, OECD, 2014, http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/national-ip-systemsinnovation-and-economic-development.htm. Final Report from the Expert Group on Intellectual Property Valuation, Führer A., European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2013, http://ec.europa.eu/research/ innovation-union/pdf/Expert_Group_Report_on_Intellectual_ Property_Valuation_IP_web_2.pdf#view¼fit&pagemode¼none. International Comparative Performance of the UK Research Base e 2013, UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, http:// www.elsevier.com/online-tools/research-intelligence/researchinitiatives/BIS2013. 1.2. Reviews are available as follows Comparative Patent Remedies: A Legal and Economic Analysis, Thomas F. Cotter, Oxford University Press, 2013. Reviewed by
Verbeeten D.R. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (3), 255. Proprietà industriale, intellettuale e IT, Trevisan and Cuonzo (Eds), IPSOA, 2013. Reviewed by Sciaudone R. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 167e168. True Patent Value: Defining Quality in Patents and Patent Portfolios, Larry M. Goldstein, True Value Press, 2013. Reviewed by Factor M. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 168e169. Patenting Medical and Genetic Diagnostic Methods, Eddy D. Ventose, Edward Elgar, 2013. Reviewed by Shivpuje V. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 91e92. Pharmaceutical Innovation, Competition and Patent Law: A Trilateral Perspective, Josef Drexl and Nari Lee (eds), Edward Elgar, 2013. Reviewed by Stothers C. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (3), 247e248. European Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court, Hugh Dunlop, Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, 2013. Reviewed by Johnson A., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (1), 61. Inside Intellectual Property e Best Practice in Intellectual Property Law, Jewess M., Management and Strategy, Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, 2013. Reviewed by Pigeon B. in CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (2), 129e130. Guidebook to Intellectual Property, Robin Jacob, Daniel Alexander and Matthew Fisher, 6th edn, Hart Publishing, 2013. Reviewed by Ouzman B., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (1), 62. 2. Journals The listing in this issue includes entries found using SciVerse ScopusÔ, Elsevier’s abstract and indexing database which gives access to almost 18,000 peer-reviewed titles from more than 5000 international publishers.
2.1. Search techniques, databases and analysis: classification: searcher certification 2.1.1. Search techniques, databases “Term clumping” for technical intelligence: A case study on dyesensitized solar cells. Zhang Y., Porter A.L., Hu Z., Guo Y., Newman N.C., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2013.12.019. A method of recognizing the root of an improved dependency tree for the Chinese patent literature. Zhu Y., Jin Y., Proceedings e 2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, 2012, 3, http://dx. doi.org/10.1109/CCIS.2012.6664638, 1517e1523. A proposed IPC-based clustering method for exploiting expert knowledge and its application to strategic planning.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001 0172-2190
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
2
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Chiu T.-F., Journal of Information Science, 2014, 40 (1), 50e66. A rule-based method for commas’ disambiguation in Chinese patent text. Song Q., Zhu Y., Wang L., Jin Y., Proceedings e 2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, 2012, 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCIS.2012.6664636, 1506e1510. A time-series-based technology intelligence framework by trend prediction functionality. Chen H., Zhang G., Lu J., Proceedings e 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/SMC.2013.593, 3477e3482. An image retrieval system for three-dimensional image. Lee C.-H., Lin J.-S., Proceedings of SPIE e The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2013, 8878, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12. 2032479. An ontology-based automatic semantic annotation approach for patent document retrieval in product innovation design. Wang F., Lin L.F., Yang Z., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 446e447, 1581e1590. Analysis and evaluation of terminology translation consistency in scientific and technical literature. Yin B., Yue X., Cai D., Zhang G., Proceedings e 2013 International Conference on Asian Language Processing, 2013, 6646009, 83e86. Analyzing topic drift in query expansion for Information Retrieval from a large-scale patent DataBase. Al-Shboul B., Myaeng S.-H., 2014 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing, 2014, 6741432, 177e182. Author name disambiguation in technology trend analysis using SVM and random forests and novel topic based features. Kastner S., Choi S.-P., Jung H., Proceedings e 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 2013, 6682413, 2141e2144. Concept suggestion based patent query method. Wu H.-T., Zhu H.-Z., Ma J.-H., Tan R.-H., Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2014, 20 (1), 79e88. CV-PCR: A context-guided value-driven framework for patent citation recommendation. Oh S., Lei Z., Lee W.-C., Mitra P., Yen J., International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505659, 2291e2296. Developing a patent landscape methodology. Smyth S.J., McPhee-Knowles S., Baker A., Phillips P.W.B., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2013, 3 (3), 251e266. Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975e2010). Li G.-C., Lai R., D’Amour A., Doolin D.M., Sun Y., Torvik V.I., Yu A.Z., Fleming L., Research Policy, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2014.01.012. Document clustering method using dimension reduction and support vector clustering to overcome sparseness. Jun S., Park S.-S., Jang D.-S., Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41 (7), 3204e3212. Effectiveness of text processing in patent documents visualization. Drazic M., Kukolj D., Vitas M., Pokric M., Manojlovic S., Tekic Z., SISY 2013 e IEEE 11th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Proceedings, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SISY. 2013.6662588, 287e291. Enriching patent search with external keywords: A feasibility study. Nikolova I., Temnikova I., Angelova G., International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP, 2013, 525e531. Identification of V þ N compound nouns in Chinese-English machine translation based on rules in patent texts.
Zhou H., Zhu Y., Jin Y., Proceedings e 2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, 2012, 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCIS.2012.6664632, 1485e1490. InSciTe adaptive: R&D decision support system for strategic foresight. Gim J., Jeong D.-H., Hwang M., Choi S.-P., Kim D.J., Lee S., Song S.-K., Jung H., Proceedings e 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/GreenCom-iThingsCPSCom.2013.428, 2249e2250. Label detection and recognition for uspto images using convolutional k-means feature quantization and ada-boost. Zhu S., Zanibbi R., Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, 2013, http://dx.doi. org/10.1109/ICDAR.2013.130, 633e637. Landscaping e a practitioner view. Roberts G., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2013, 3 (4), 313e317. Measuring closure properties of patent sublanguages. Temnikova I.P., Hailu N.D., Angelova G., Cohen K.B., International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP, 2013, 659e666. Patent keyword network analysis for improving technology development efficiency. Choi J., Hwang Y.-S., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 83 (1), 170e182. Proposal of a matching system for companies and researchers using patents and scientific papers. Yamada Y., Tansho T., Hirokawa S., Proceedings e 2nd IIAI International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics, 2013, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2013.55, 397e398. Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977e2004. Fontana R., Nuvolari A., Shimizu H., Vezzulli A., Research Policy, 2013, 42 (10), 1780e1792. Semantic analysis of Chinese prepositional phrases for patent machine translation. Hu R., Zhu Y., Jin Y., Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2013, 8202 LNAI, 333e342. Semantic title evaluation and recommendation based on topic models. Jin H., Zhang L., Du L., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2013, 7819 LNAI (PART 2), 402e413. Technology matching of the patent documents using clustering algorithms. Drazic M., Kukolj D., Vitas M., Pokric M., Manojlovic S., Tekic Z., CINTI 2013 e 14th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics, Proceedings, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/CINTI.2013.6705231, 405e409. The use of competitive intelligence in IP monetisation. Millien R., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (64), 80e85. Two stage genetic approach for bio-chemical named entity recognition. Ekbal A., Saha S., Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2013.6637260, 709e713. Uses unexpired patent to re-evaluate innovation performance by hindex and h-core indicators. Wang C.-C., Li Y.-T., Chen D.-Z., Huang M.-H., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641738, 965e971. Using multiple data source to enhance part-of-speech tagging for Chinese patent.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Qiu L., Zeng L., Kang S., ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 2014, 5 (1), 265e270. Using patent ontology engineering for intellectual property defense support system. Wu C.-Y., Trappey A.J.C., Trappey C.V., Advanced Concurrent Engineering, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7-18, 207e217. Using query logs of USPTO patent examiners for automatic query expansion in patent searching. Tannebaum W., Rauber A., Information Retrieval, 2014, http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s10791-014-9238-7. Vacant technology forecasting using new Bayesian patent clustering. Choi S., Jun S., Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 2014, 26 (3), 241e251. 2.1.2. Analysis and statistics A comparative study of patent counts by the inventor country and the assignee country. Sung H.-Y., Wang C.-C., Chen D.-Z., Huang M.-H., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1192-4, 1e17. A method for partner selection in R&D collaboration between large companies and SMEs using patent information. Lee K.-E., Yoon B., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641747, 1886e1891. Absorptive capacity, knowledge flows, and innovation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Mukherji N., Silberman J., Journal of Regional Science, 2013, 53 (3), 392e417. An analysis of the patenting activities and collaboration among industry-university-research institutes in the Chinese ICT sector. Gao X., Guo X., Guan J., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (1), 247e263. Analysing knowledge capture mechanisms: Methods and a stylised bioventure case. Gurney T., Horlings E., van den Besselaar P., Sumikura K., Schoen A., Laurens P., Pardo D., Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8 (1), 259e272. Analysis of core and proximal technologies for electric vehicles in China. Jiang J., Suzuki J., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641750, 548e554. Analysis of the development and trends of nanotechnology in China’s market based on patent data. Zheng J., Gaojishu Tongxin/Chinese High Technology Letters, 2013, 23 (10), 1068e1076. Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: The case of Korean national R&D. Park H., Yoon J., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 853e890. Benchmarking the patent portfolio: A study of the Italian wind energy manufacturing industry. lo Storto C., Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 838e841, 3212e3217. Border sensitive centralities in patent citation networks using asymmetric random walks. Morrison G., Giovanis E., Pammolli F., Riccoboni M., Proceedings e 2013 International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SITIS. 2013.91, 546e552. Car2X-Communication mirrored by business method patents: What documented inventions can tell us about the future. Niemann H., Moehrle M.G., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641682, 976e984. Chinese patents on continuous catalytic reforming technologies and analysis. Zhao Y., Yao J., Dong L., Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2013, 43 (9), 61e64.
3
Collaborative networks and technology clusters e The case of nanowire. Ozcan S., Islam N., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 82 (1), 115e131. Constraints of internally and externally derived knowledge and the innovativeness of technological output: The case of the United States. Rosenzweig S., Mazursky D., Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31 (2), 231e246. Creating patents on the new technology using analogy-based patent mining. Jeong C., Kim K., Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41 (8), 3605e3614. Dynamic patterns of technological convergence in printed electronics technologies: Patent citation network. Kim E., Cho Y., Kim W., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 975e998. Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: a comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, copatents and co-publications. Wanzenbock I., Scherngell T., Brenner T., Annals of Regional Science, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0588-7, 1e32. Empirical analysis on evolution and small world effect of chinese enterpriseeenterprise patent cooperation network: From the perspective of open innovation. Ye C., Yu X., Li W., Information (Switzerland), 2013, 4 (4), 398e410. Exploring gender differences in patenting in Spain. Mauleon E., Daraio C., Bordons M., Research Evaluation, 2014, 23 (1), 62e78. Exploring knowledge diffusion among nations: a study of core technologies in fuel cells. Ho M.H.-C., Lin V.H., Liu J.S., Scientometrics, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-014-1265-z. Exploring technology opportunities in an industry via clustering method and association analysis. Chiu T.-F., Hong C.-F., Chiu Y.-T., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2013, 8083 LNAI, 593e602. Family firm density and regional innovation output: An exploratory analysis. Block J.H., Spiegel F., Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2013, 4 (4), 270e280. Federal research spending and innovation in the U.S. economy. Ngoie J.K., Journal of Policy Modeling, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.jpolmod.2014.01.010. Food packaging printing technology trend analysis: A patent analysis approach. Liu Y.J., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 469, 387e395. Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other: An ’Algorithmic Links with Probabilities’ approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity. Lybbert T.J., Zolas N.J., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (3), 530e542. How do the BRIC countries play their roles in the global innovation arena? A study based on USPTO patents during 1990e2009. Wang Y., Li-Ying J., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 1065e1083. How does firm size moderate firms’ ability to benefit from invention? Evidence from patents and scientific publications. Belenzon S., Patacconi A., European Management Review, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emre.12021. How fast do Chinese firms learn and catch up? Evidence from patent citations. Wang Y., Roijakkers N., Vanhaverbeke W., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (1), 743e761. Influences of counting methods on country rankings: a perspective from patent analysis. Zheng J., Zhao Z., Zhang X., Huang M.-h., Chen D.-z., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1139-9, 1e16.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
4
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Inter-cluster connectivity analysis for technology opportunity discovery. Kim B., Gazzola G., Lee J.-M., Kim D., Kim K., Jeong M.K., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1097-2, 1e15. International collaboration development in nanotechnology: A perspective of patent network analysis. Zheng J., Zhao Z.-Y., Zhang X., Chen D.-Z., Huang M.-H., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (1), 683e702. Knowledge characteristics and the dynamics of technological alliances in pharmaceuticals: empirical evidence from Europe, US and Japan. Krafft J., Quatraro F., Saviotti P.P., Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0338-8. Knowledge technological proximity: evidence from US and European patents. Aldieri L., Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2013, 22 (8), 807e819. Loosely-coupled networks of knowledge production and diffusion. Giudicati G., Riccaboni M., Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, 2013, 1, 245e253. Network structural analysis of technology: A study from patent perspective. Xu S., Wang X., Liu Z., Luan C., Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 2013, 4 (3), 214e235. Patent analysis and counter-measures for monitoring system of environmental nuclear radiation. Gu A.-M., Wang H.-J., Zhang J.-G., Zhang L.-X., Hedianzixue Yu Tance Jishu/Nuclear Electronics and Detection Technology, 2013, 33 (6), 770e774. Patent analysis in assessing supply chain management innovation. Suh C.-K., Recent Trends in Social and Behaviour Sciences e Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Interdisciplinary Behavior and Social Sciences 2013, 2014, 303e307. Patent applications as source for measuring technological performance. Sepulveda J., Paternina A., Suarez A., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 1385e1395. Patent applications on representative sectors of biotechnology in Brazil: An analysis of the last decade. Mendes L., Amorim-Borher B., Lage C., Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2013, 8 (4), 91e102. Patent-based study on rail transit development in China. Yang W.J., Han B.M., Lan Y.J., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 505e506, 609e612. Patents for technological trajectories understanding: The avionics case study. Aurelie B., Marc G., Didier R., AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference e Proceedings, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DASC. 2013.6712541, 2C41e2C49. Patents in nanotechnology: an analysis using macro-indicators and forecasting curves. Milanez D.H., de Faria L.I.L., do Amaral R.M., Leiva D.R., Gregolin J.A.R., Scientometrics, 2014, 1e16. Price-and policy-induced innovations: The case of U.S. biofuel. Jang H., Du X., Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2013, 38 (3), 299e311. Productivity and innovation: A spatial approach. Lamieri M., Sangalli I., Economia e Politica Industriale, 2013, 40 (2), 67e89. Profiling U.S. metropolitan regions by their social research networks and regional economic performance. Strumsky D., Thill J.-C., Journal of Regional Science, 2013, 53 (5), 813e833. R&D efficiency and the national innovation system: An international comparison using the distance function approach.
Hu J.-L., Yang C.-H., Chen C.-P., Bulletin of Economic Research, 2014, 66 (1), 55e71. Research on the technical fields distribution of patents licensing of Chinese firms in the next-generation information technology industry. Qiao Y.-Z., Liu S.-W., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 530e 531, 1142e1145. Study on patent analysis of titanium alloys. Wu J., Zhao C., Fu X., Tezhong Zhuzao Ji Youse Hejin/Special Casting and Nonferrous Alloys, 2013, 33 (11), 1045e1048. Studying MRI technology development using patent analysis. Luo R., Lin Y., Ding Q., Proceedings of the 2013 6th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2013.6746966, 373e377. Technological diversity and inventor networks. Cecere G., Ozman M., Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2014, 23 (2), 161e178. Technological impact factor: An indicator to measure the impact of academic publications on practical innovation. Huang M.-H., Huang W.-T., Chen D.-Z., Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8 (1), 241e251. Technological Relatedness and Knowledge Space: Entry and Exit of US Cities from Patent Classes. Rigby D.L., Regional Studies, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 00343404.2013.854878. Technology forecasting of green energy using patent analysis and simulation modeling. Jun S.H., Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 875e877, 1619e1624. Technology mapping of the underwater sensor networks by patent documents using two commercial software. De Melo A.A., Ribeiro G.L., Martinez M.E.M., Dos Reis P.C., Proceedings e 2013 Symposium on Computing and Automation for Offshore Shipbuilding, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NAVCOMP. 2013.14, 40e45. Technology-industry networks in technology commercialization: evidence from Korean university patents. Cho Y., Kim W., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-013-1131-4, 1e26. The Evolution Dynamic of a Cluster Knowledge Network: The Role of Firms’ Absorptive Capacity. Nicotra M., Romano M., Del Giudice M., Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2014, 5 (1), 70e93. The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case. Bonaccorsi A., Colombo M.G., Guerini M., Rossi-Lamastra C., Small Business Economics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-0139536-2, 1e27. The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative. Jung H.J., Lee J.J., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (1), 74e91. The patent information, strategic patent deployment thinking, and technology strategies of small and medium-sized enterprises. Chen S.-J., Su F.-P., Lai K.-K., Yang M.-T., Chang P.-C., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641726, 48e61. The role of text mining of patent in Mergers and Acquisitions. Huang L., Guo Y., Zhao Y., Wang Y., Porter A.L., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641687, 2271e2282. TRIZ evolution theory applied to man-made boards. Yu H.L., Liang H., Fan D.L., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 441, 1060e1063. University-owned and university-invented patents: a network analysis on two Italian universities.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Capellari S., De Stefano D., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-013-1211-5, 1e17. Using a text mining tool for patent analyses: Development of a new method for the repairing of gas turbines. Wich Y., Warschat J., Spath D., Ardilio A., Konig-Urban K., Uhlmann E., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641599, 1010e1016. Validating the usefulness of examiners’ forward citations from the viewpoint of applicants’ self-selection during the patent application procedure. Yasukawa S., Kano S., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s11192-013-1195-1, 1e15. Visualizing knowledge space: a case study of Chinese licensed technology, 2000e2012. Wang Y., Pan X., Wang X., Chen J., Ning L., Qin Y., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1135-0, 1e20. 2.2. Patents 2.2.1. Relating to life sciences and pharmaceuticals Analyzing research publication patterns to gauge future innovation pathways for Nano-Enabled Drug Delivery. Zhou X., Porter A., Robinson D.K.R., Guo Y., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641731, 2188e2199. Articles 3(a) and 3(b) of the SPC regulation: and analysis. Berwal P.S., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (1), 29e38. Balancing the right to know and the privacy of the patent system: A case study of oncology medicines in Thailand. Yamabhai I., Smith R.D., International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 2013, 6 (4), 272e284. Bioethical ambition, political opportunity and the European governance of patenting: The case of human embryonic stem cell science. Salter B., Salter C., Social Science and Medicine, 2013, 98, 286e292. Biopiracy by law: European Union draft law threatens indigenous peoples’ rights over their traditional knowledge and genetic resources. Tobin B., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (2), 124e 136. Biotech patents and science policy: The Spanish experience. Belda I., Penas G., Alonso A., Marquina D., Navascues E., Santos A., Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32 (1), 59e61. Changes in global pharmaceutical patent strategy due to intergovernmental cooperation. Komatani T.S., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (2), 133e136. Commencement or completion: what constitutes a “human embryo” within the meaning of the EU Biotechnology Directive? Schacht H., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (1), 66e71. Drug safe harbour provisions in the USA and Europe: implications for the emerging biosimilars industry. Kretzschmar M.D., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (4), 298e311. Heterogeneities and patterns of innovations in life sciences sector: The case of stem cells employing patent families data. Xie Z., Sengoku S., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641749, 2502e2516. Human Capital, Social Collaboration, and Patent Renewal Within U.S. Pharmaceutical Firms. Liu K., Journal of Management, 2014, 40 (2), 616e636. Intellectual property rights and detached human body parts. Pila J., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2014, 40 (1), 27e32. Inter partes review: considerations for Abbreviated New Drug Application cases.
5
Carson P., Taylor S., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (2), 125e 127. International Stem Cell Corp v Comptroller General of Patents: The debate regarding the definition of the human embryo continues. O’Sullivan E., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (3), 155e163. Nature, nurture and DNA sequences. Ghosh S., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (1), 5e7. Novartis v Union of India and the person skilled in the art: a missed opportunity. Thambisetty S., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2014, 4 (1), 79e94. On the monopoly: Speculation, pharmaceutical markets, and intellectual property law in Nigeria. Peterson K., American Ethnologist, 2014, 41 (1), 128e142. Patent policies and provisions relating to pharmaceuticals in India. Nair G.G., Fernandes A., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 7e17. Patenting personalized medicines in the UK, Europe and USA. Parker S., Hall B., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (2), 163e 169. Patents on inventions related to human embryonic stem cells: the morality clause after Brüstle v. Greenpeace. Panis S., Medicine and law, 2013, 32 (3), 347e372. Pharmaceutical and biotech product patents in India: Doldrums or blissfulness? Chowdhury P., Khan S.A., Dutta P., Mahanta J., Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32 (2), 133e134. Recent pharmaceutical patent decisions in the United States. Baltatzis A., Marvin S., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 18e26. Strategies for patenting combination therapies: Proving nonobviousness is essential to obtaining patent protection. Toffenetti J.L., Chen C., Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 2013, 33 (21), 8e9. The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Intellectual Property Policy: stay the course (mostly). Mireles M.S., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 48e60. The complementary assets and appropriability affect patent commercialization on the moderate effect of marketing sensing capability: The case of bio-patents in Taiwan. Lin J.-H., Wang M.-Y., Lo H.-C., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641725, 871e879. The dynamic state of patents in regenerative medicine. Furman E., Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2013, 10 (5), 230e233. The future of prenatal molecular diagnostics: impact of the changing patent landscape. Rachinsky T.L., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (1), 1e3. The impact of patent protection and lack of generic competition on the right of access to medicines in South Africa: Explicating corporate responsibilities for human rights. Muswaka L., Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2014, 5 (2), 229e235. The Indian Supreme Court‘s judgment in the case of GlivecÒ e the uncertain future of pharmaceutical patents in India. Thikkavarapu P.R., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (2), 117e 119. The learning needs of the patent system and emerging technologies: A focus on synthetic biology. Thambisetty S., Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2014, (1), 13e39. The many means to an end: training methods in pharmaceutical and medical IP law.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
6
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Purcell N.S., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (1), 9e12. The new drugs war: Patents on drugs are in the interests of the sick as well as the industry. Protection should not be weakened. Economist (United Kingdom), 2014, 410 (8864). The patenting of biotechnological inventions in the EU, the judicial bodies involved and the objectives of the EU legislator. Aerts B.J., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (2), 88e94. The seeds of dispute: Vernon Hugh Bowman v. Monsanto company et al. Gambini E., European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2013, 4 (4), 579e 585. The tale of Viagra patents: Comparative studies of the global challenges in china and other countries. Liu Y., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 18 (6), 523e533. Transparency tools in gene patenting for informing policy and practice. Jefferson O.A., Kollhofer D., Ehrich T.H., Jefferson R.A., Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31 (12), 1086e1093. 2.2.2. Relating to software Dynamic competition in software development: how copyrights and patents, and their overlapping, impact on derivative innovation. Ghidini G., Arezzo E., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2013, 3 (4), 278e295. Ill-conceived, even if competently administered: Software patents, litigation, and innovation-A comment on Graham and Vishnubhakat. Miller S.P., Tabarrok A., Econ Journal Watch, 2014, 11 (1), 37e45. Trends in inter partes review and covered business method review. Gonsalves G.J., Beckett T.C., Leff B., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (64), 20e27. 2.2.3. Policy and strategic issues A framework of product innovative design process based on TRIZ and Patent Circumvention. Li M., Ming X., Zheng M., Xu Z., He L., Journal of Engineering Design, 2013, 24 (12), 830e848. A strategy for the bigger, simpler PPH system. Talbot-Ponsonby D., Blake S., Pediani S., Managing Intellectual Property, 2014, (236), 16e19. A structured approach to classifying evolutionary patterns of technology-driven business models: Hybrid analysis of co-word and citation approaches. No H.J., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641789, 2076e2082. A taxonomy of utility model patents application strategy. Hsueh C.-C., Luo Y.-C., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641754, 946e952. An application of patent strategy in medium-small enterprises product innovation process. Zhan J.-T., Yan J., 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Management System Innovation, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38427-1-173, 1633e1640. Applying International Patent Classification (IPC) to strategic planning processes of an R&D organization: The case of NECTEC, Thailand. Jotisakulratana M., Koomgun N., Virojrid R., Udomsaph B., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the ITDriven Services, 6641621, 1913e1918. Beyond the patents-prizes debate. Hemel D.J., Ouellette L.L., Texas Law Review, 2013, 92 (2), 303e382. Beyond the US borders: A primary analysis of extraterritorial application of US patent law.
Lei Z., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 27e32. How to innovate intellectual property service by prediction of infringement probability. Su H.-N., Kang C.-W., Lin J.-Y., Wu Y.-H., Lee M., Lee P.-C., Proceedings e 2013 5th International Conference on Service Science and Innovation, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSSI.2013.23, 186e192. Patent Licensing with Bertrand Competitors. Colombo S., Filippini L., Manchester School, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/manc.12050. Patents, Transaction Costs and Academic Research Project Choice. Jensen P.H., Webster E., Economic Record, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/1475-4932.12093. Running ahead in the nanotechnology gold rush. Strategic patenting in emerging technologies. Munari F., Toschi L., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 83 (1), 194e207. Strategic implications of AIA for IT entrepreneurs: A practical primer about the new patent world. Spivey W.A., Munson J.M., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641581, 1017e1031. Strategies for patenting “green” technologies in materials science. Vekris E., Materials Science and Technology Conference and Exhibition 2013, 3, 1766e1773. Strategies of the top global filers at the Indian Patent Office. Kurup A., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 29e 33. Study on influence factors of the implementation of enterprise patent strategy. Wang L., Lin Z., Wang H., Chen S., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641803, 972e 975. The driving force of university patent transaction: Evidence from twenty-six provinces of China. Zhang N., Gu X., Wang Y., Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40081-0_92, 1095e 1106. The economic value of patented inventions: Thoughts and some open questions. Gambardella A., International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2013, 31 (5), 626e633. The timing of using patent information by university scientists: A lesson from the biotechnology sector in Taiwan. Chang T.-Y., Li J.-R., Proceedings e 2013 5th International Conference on Service Science and Innovation, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/ICSSI.2013.44, 201e207. When do firms benefit from universityeindustry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination. Soh P.-H., Subramanian A.M., Journal of Business Venturing, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.11.001. 2.2.4. Other patent topics (When) Do stronger patents increase continual innovation? Chen Y., Pan S., Zhang T., Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2014, 98, 115e124. Advanced high strength steel tube diagrid using TRIZ and nonlinear pushover analysis. Lee D., Shin S., Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 96, 151e158. Afghanistan: the final frontier for patents. Kilday L., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 63e 68. An inside view to non-practicing entities business models: A case study.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Larson K., International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 2013, 6 (4), 294e315. Belated evidence of proof of use: Court of Justice of the European Union case law reviewed. Marten G., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (4), 287e291. Best mode disclosure in Canadian patents. Vaver D., Intellectual Property Journal, 2013, 25 (3), 303e333. Blocking blocks at the border: Examining standard-essential patent litigation between domestic companies at the ITC. Norris M., Minnesota Law Review, 2013, 98 (2), 713e744. Can competition law repair patent law and administrative procedures? AstraZeneca. Podszun R., Common Market Law Review, 2014, 51 (1), 281e294. Chinese patent explosion factors: An empirical analysis based on system and policy. Liu Y., Tan L., Song S.S., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641809, 1058e1069. Complementary patents and market structure. Schmidt K.M., Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2014, 23 (1), 68e88. Compulsory licensing: Implications on multinational drug companies. Prasad V., Babu P.S.S.K., International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 2013, 6 (4), 247e271. Did patents of introduction encourage technology transfer? Longterm evidence from the Spanish innovation system. Saiz P., Cliometrica, 2014, 8 (1), 49e78. Do NPEs matter? Non-practicing entities and patent litigation outcomes. Mazzeo M.J., Ashtor J.H., Zyont S., Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2013, 9 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht031, 879e904. Do patents affect VC financing? Empirical evidence from the nanotechnology sector. Munari F., Toschi L., International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0295-y, 1e22. European unitary patent: are we there yet? Ellyne E., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2014, 4 (1), 57e78. Evaluating flexibility in international patent law. Rajec S.R.W., Hastings Law Journal, 2013, 65 (1), 153e211. Ex ante agreements in standard setting and patent-pool formation. Llanes G., Poblete J., Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2014, 23 (1), 50e67. Examining the determinants of drug launch delay in pre-TRIPS India. Bhaduri S., Brenner T., European Journal of Health Economics, 2013, 14 (5), 761e773. Expanding patent Law’s customer suit exception. Love B.J., Yoon J.C., Boston University Law Review, 2013, 93 (5), 1605e1641. Exploiting technological indicators for effective technology merger and acquisition (M&A) predictions. Yang C.-S., Wei C.-P., Chiang Y.-H., Decision Sciences, 2014, 45 (1), 147e174. Explore the new relationship between patents and market value: A panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach. Chen Y.-S., Shih C.-Y., Chang C.-H., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 1145e1159. Extracting value from IPR through patent brokerage. Benassi M.F., Geenen G.T., Economia e Politica Industriale, 2013, 40 (4), 89e116. Factors that influence the propensity to patent.
7
Perez-Cano C., Villen-Altamirano J., EMJ e Engineering Management Journal, 2013, 25 (3), 27e38. Finally a single European right for the EU? An analysis of the substantive provisions of the European Patent with Unitary Effect. Kaisi A., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (3), 170e 180. Framework design for an automated patent licensing negotiation system. Wang L., Liu X.-F., Li F., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641672, 2392e2396. FRAND’s forever: Standards, patent transfers, and licensing commitments. Kesan J.P., Hayes C.M., Indiana Law Journal, 2014, 89 (1), 231e314. Government sponsorship and nature of patenting activity of US universities and corporations. Drivas K., Economidou C., Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2013, 22 (8), 775e806. How a large biotechnology company teamed with a translation service provider to define best practices. Coombs J., Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2014, 20 (1), 49e 53. How much is a patent worth? Factor M., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 168e169. How to value IP portfolios for acquisition. Patel A., Germeraad P., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 57e62. Incentive effects from different approaches to holdup mitigation surrounding patent remedies and standard-setting organizations. Scott Kieff F., Layne-Farrar A., Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2013, 9 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht030, 1091e 1123. Innovative method by design-around concepts with integrating the algorithm for inventive problem solving. Chen W.-C., Chen J.L., Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2014, 28 (1), 201e211. Institutional and organizational factors associated to academic patenting in a Mexican university: Teams’ trajectories, networks and performance. Perez C.D., Aguilar J.A., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641784, 1032e1043. International harmonization of the grace period: the experience of Japan. Ishimaru S., Nakaya Y., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 61e74. International influence e TRIPS and patentable subject-matter. Hashim M.R., IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44 (6), 656e670. International patent systems strength 1998e2011. Papageorgiadis N., Cross A.R., Alexiou C., Journal of World Business, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.12.011. Inventor’s Knowledge Set as the Antecedent of Patent Importance. Mohammadi A., Franzoni C., Industry and Innovation, 2014, 21 (1), 65e87. Joint patent infringement following Akamai. Grow N., American Business Law Journal, 2014, 51 (1), 71e117. Akamai: Patent claims are now broader than the invention. Reinecke B.M., Wisconsin Law Review, 2013 (5), 1231e1262. Jurisdiction in disputes about infringements of intellectual property rights on the internet in view of recent ECJ case law. Bogdan M., Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 2013, 7 (2), 193e200. Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity among Japanese and US scientists.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
8
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Walsh J.P., Huang H., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (2), 245e260. Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Arora A., Belenzon S., Rios L.A., Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35 (3), 317e337. Market value of R&D, patents, and organizational capital: Finnish evidence. Rahko J., Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2013.864923. Missing the forest for the trolls. Lemley M.A., Melamed A.D., Columbia Law Review, 2013, 113 (12), 2117e2189. Novatis v Lee: a new method for calculating US patent term adjustment. Tridica A.C., Doherty E.A., Lechner J.D., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (2), 95e96. Organisational Change and the Institutionalisation of University Patenting Activity in Italy. Baldini N., Fini R., Grimaldi R., Sobrero M., Minerva, 2014, http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9243-9, 1e27. Patent cases and public controversies. Rinehart A.S., Notre Dame Law Review, 2013, 89 (1), 361e402. Patent law decisions from Supreme Courts: how can non-specialist judges decide this field of law? Smyth D., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 31e39. Patent life cycle: New evidence. Hikkerova L., Kammoun N., Lantz J.-S., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013. 10.005. Patent nonuse and technology suppression: The use of compulsory licensing to promote progress. Tyler N.S., University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2014, 162 (2), 451e475. Patent storage study of cooperation between S&T-oriented small and micro enterprise and university in triple helix innovation based on short-supply-allowed EOQ model. Lai Q.F., Su S.B., Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 869e870, 1071e1074. Patent value analysis using support vector machines. Ercan S., Kayakutlu G., Soft Computing, 2014, 18 (2), 313e328. Patents and plausibility. England P., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 22e30. Patents and the dissemination of inventions. Alderucci D., Baumol W.J., Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2013, 27 (4), 223e224. Pooling with essential and nonessential patents. Quint D., American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2014, 6 (1 D), 23e57. Pre-empted patents, infringed patents and firms’ participation in markets for technology. Grimpe C., Hussinger K., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (3), 543e554. Private value of patent right and patent infringement: An empirical study based on patent renewal data of china. Zhang G., Lv X., Zhou J., China Economic Review, 2014, 28, 37e54. Recent moves to enhance the quality of patents in China. Mak T., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (2), 99e101. Research on the effects of regional R&D cooperation among enterprises, universities and research institutes on their innovation performance in China. Li B., Zhang N., Liu F., Proceedings of 2013 6th International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2013, 1, 6702948, 356e361. Review of patent cases in the English courts in 2013.
Cordery B., Adair D., Hazenberg N., Delbeuf S., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (2), 76e91. Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth. Cozzi G., Galli S., Journal of Economic Growth, 2013, http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10887-013-9101-5, 1e37. Simplifying multiactor patent infringement cases through proper application of common law doctrine. Oswald L.J., American Business Law Journal, 2014, 51 (1), 1e69. Spain’s action against the EU patent package: arguments and counter-arguments in case C-146/13. Tilmann W, European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (1), 4e8. Standards-essential patents: A prolegomena. Pai Y., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 59e66. Study on regional difference of three type patent’s economic contribution. Wang L., Li H., Proceedings of 2013 6th International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2, 6703247, 97e100. Technical standards and patent pools: Antecedents, formation and distinctions. Wang J., Peng X., Song W., Zhang X., Song X., Yao Y., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 18 (6), 511e522. Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value e An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions. Fischer T., Leidinger J., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (3), 519e529. The brokered patent market in 2013. Richardson K., Oliver E., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 11e19. The complex and debated role of NPEs in the patent system. Schwartz D.L., Kesan J.P., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 21e26. The determinants of academic patenting by Italian universities. Rizzo U., Ramaciotti L., Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.882502. The diminishing signaling value of patents between early rounds of venture capital financing. Hoenen S., Kolympiris C., Schoenmakers W., Kalaitzandonakes N., Research Policy, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01. 006. The duty to disclose “the invention”: the wrong tool for the job. Siebrasse N., Intellectual Property Journal, 2013, 25 (3), 269e301. The European Commission policy towards the licensing of standard-essential patents: Where do we stand? Geradin D., Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2013, 9 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht036, 1125e1145. The European patent: An old and vexing problem. Pila J., International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2013, 62 (4), 917e940. The impact of small world on patent productivity in China. Zhang G., Guan J., Liu X., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 945e960. The impact of the evolution of relationship between technical standards and patents on technical innovation. Ai-Ping T., TingeTing S., Feng L., Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2014, 7 (2), 214e220. The interpretation-construction distinction in patent law. Chiang T.-J., Solum L.B., Yale Law Journal, 2013, 123 (3), 530e614. The patent eligibility of graphene claims following the U.S. supreme court’s myriad decision. Terzoli Jr. R.S., Gervasi C.N., Haag T., Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2013, 10 (2), 123e131. The patent policy debate in the high-techworld. Gupta K., Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2013, 9 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht039, 827e858. The progress to date with the Unitary European patent and the unified patent court for Europe.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Cook T., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013,18 (6), 584e588. The smartphone patent wars saga: availability of injunctive relief for standard essential patents. Fröhlich M., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 156e159. The trouble with treble damages: Ditching patent law’s willful infringement doctrine and enhanced damages. Means S.C., University of Illinois Law Review, 2013, 2013 (5), 1999e 2045. What are the channels for technology sourcing? Panel data evidence from German companies. Harhoff D., Mueller E., Van Reenen J., Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2014, 23 (1), 204e224. IPR, IPR Awareness among MSMEs in India. Rao K.S., Noorinasab A.R., IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 2013, 15 (2), 13e21. What the supreme court’s myriad decision means for nanotechnology patents. Baluch A.S., Maebius S.B., Wegner H.C., Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2013, 10 (2), 132e137. Why do juries decide if patents are valid? Lemley M.A., Virginia Law Review, 2013, 99 (8), 1673e1736. 2.3. Trademarks and domain names 2.3.1. Trademarks Drug commodity name protection e a pitfall in China’s new revised trademark law? Zhu N., World Intellectual Property Report, 2013, 27 (12), 30e32. European trade mark law: registrable signs, service marks. von Mühlendahl A., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 160e164. Information in the mark and the marketplace: A multivocal account. Duguid P., Enterprise and Society, 2014, 15 (1), 1e30. Marking your trade: Cultural factors in the prolongation of trademarks. Melnyk V., Giarratana M., Torres A., Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67 (4), 478e485. Morality tales e trade marks and the religious word. Chaudri A., Joy D., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (1), 20e22. Repeated filings of a European Community trade mark. Stumpf K., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (3), 225e230. Substantial value rule: How it came into being and why it should be abolished. Gielen C., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (3), 164e 169. The devil wears trademark: How the fashion industry has expanded trademark doctrine to its detriment. Harvard Law Review, 2014, 127 (3), 995e1016. The notion of famous, well-known trade marks and marks with repute compared. Naser M.A, Hammouri T.M., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (4), 312e321. The Rooibos rush. Jooste C., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (1), 1e3. Trade marks and national flora: an analysis of EU law concerning the possibility of registering names of plants as trade marks. Coelho L.T., Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2014, (1), 71e94. Trademark families: Characteristics and market values. Block J.H., Fisch C., Sandner P.G., Journal of Brand Management, 2014, 21 (2), 150e170. Trademark image retrieval based on scale, rotation, translation invariant features.
9
Nguyen T.D., Nguyen H.H.H., Le T.H., Proceedings e 2013 RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies: Research, Innovation, and Vision for Future, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/RIVF.2013.6719908, 282e285. 2.4. Designs Design patents for animated images: Development trends. Chen R., Shen S.-Y., Tan S.-P., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 43e48. The informed user in design law: what should he compare and how should he make the comparison. Geerts P.G.F.A., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (3), 181e185. Determining design patent similarity based on the ordinary observer test. Chen R., Kuo H.-T., Wang M.-H., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 18 (6), 548e-555. 2.5. Other IP; general IP issues 2.5.1. Policy and strategic issues Two emerging innovative dragons: An analysis of the IPR strategy of China’s Huawei and ZTE. Godinho M.M., Ferreira V., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641578, 1044e 1057. 2.5.2. Other IP issues Beyond unbridled optimism and fear: Indigenous peoples, intellectual property, human rights and the globalisation of traditional knowledge and expressions of folklore: Part II. Picart C.J.S., Fox M., International Community Law Review, 2014, 16 (1), 3e37. Intellectual Property puts art.6(1) Brussels Regulation to the test. Torremans P., Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2014, (1), 1e12. Intellectual property rights, southern innovation and foreign direct investment. Mathew A.J., Mukherjee A., International Review of Economics and Finance, 2014, 31, 128e137. What impact does intellectual property have on the business performance of technology firms. Willoughby K.W., International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 2013, 6 (4), 316e338. What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is mine too: Converging U.S. intellectual property exhaustion doctrines. Dennis J.K.P., Computer Law and Security Review, 2014, 30 (1), 55e 66. 2.6. Historical Behind the scenes of Scottish researches into agar supply during the 1940s. Moore P.G., Archives of Natural History, 2013, 40 (2), 228e243. From patents to stock buffering schemes: The historical evolution of the international aluminium cartels (1886e1945). Bertilorenzi M., Revue Economique, 2013, 64 (6), 1145e1169. Patents, what for? The case of Crossley Brothers and the introduction of the gas engine into Spain, c. 1870e1914. Ortiz-Villajos J.M., Business History, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/00076791.2013.837890. The Spark of invention. Andrews C., Engineering and Technology, 2013, 8 (9), 68e69. Investigation of historical hard rubber ornaments of Charles Goodyear.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
10
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Raue M., Wambach M., Gloggler S., Grefen D., Kaufmann R., Abetz C., Georgopanos P., Handge U.A., Mang T., Blumich B., Abetz V., Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 215 (3), 245e254. Patent pools and innovation in substitute technologies-evidence from the 19th-century sewing machine industry. Lampe R., Moser P., RAND Journal of Economics, 2013, 44 (4), 757e 778.
David Newton Crooked Thatch, East End, Hook Norton, Banbury OX15 5LG, United Kingdom E-mail address: [email protected]. Available online xxx
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
World Patent Information journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/worpatin
Literature listing 1. Books 1.1. Recent reports and other monographs World Intellectual Property Indicators e 2013 Edition, WIPO, http:// www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ipstats/en/wipi/2013/pdf/wipo_ pub_941_2013_highlights.pdf. Patents and Standards e A modern framework for IPR-based standardization, ECSIP Consortium, European Commission, 2014, http:// ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/4843/attachments/1/ translations/en/renditions/pdf. World Intellectual Property Report 2013 e Brands e Reputation and Image in the Global Marketplace, WIPO, http://www.wipo.int/ export/sites/www/freepublications/en/intproperty/944/wipo_ pub_944_2013.pdf. The European Patent e a European success story for innovation, European Patent Office, [2014], Pascal Griset. Securing the Future of Your IP Department: Protecting and Driving Value from Patents, Trademarks and Brands, 2014 eBook, Global IP Exchange, http://www.globalipexchange.co.uk/. IPR Jagoran, The Tezpur University IPR Cell newsletter, January 2014, http://www.tezu.ernet.in/tuipr_cell/newsletter/IP%20JAGO RON_TUIPR_2013_final_16%20jan%202014.pdf. The Informal Economy, Innovation and Intellectual Property e Concepts, Metrics and Policy Considerations, WIPO Economic Research Working Paper No. 10, 2013, de Beer J., Fu K., Wunsch-Vincent S, http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/econ_stat/en/economics/ pdf/wp10.pdf. Commercialising Public Research e New Trends and Strategies, OECD, 2013, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/ commercialising-public-research-new-trends-and-strategies_ 9789264193321-en. National Intellectual Property Systems, Innovation and Economic Development with perspectives on Colombia and Indonesia, OECD, 2014, http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/national-ip-systemsinnovation-and-economic-development.htm. Final Report from the Expert Group on Intellectual Property Valuation, Führer A., European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2013, http://ec.europa.eu/research/ innovation-union/pdf/Expert_Group_Report_on_Intellectual_ Property_Valuation_IP_web_2.pdf#view¼fit&pagemode¼none. International Comparative Performance of the UK Research Base e 2013, UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, http:// www.elsevier.com/online-tools/research-intelligence/researchinitiatives/BIS2013. 1.2. Reviews are available as follows Comparative Patent Remedies: A Legal and Economic Analysis, Thomas F. Cotter, Oxford University Press, 2013. Reviewed by
Verbeeten D.R. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (3), 255. Proprietà industriale, intellettuale e IT, Trevisan and Cuonzo (Eds), IPSOA, 2013. Reviewed by Sciaudone R. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 167e168. True Patent Value: Defining Quality in Patents and Patent Portfolios, Larry M. Goldstein, True Value Press, 2013. Reviewed by Factor M. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 168e169. Patenting Medical and Genetic Diagnostic Methods, Eddy D. Ventose, Edward Elgar, 2013. Reviewed by Shivpuje V. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 91e92. Pharmaceutical Innovation, Competition and Patent Law: A Trilateral Perspective, Josef Drexl and Nari Lee (eds), Edward Elgar, 2013. Reviewed by Stothers C. in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (3), 247e248. European Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court, Hugh Dunlop, Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, 2013. Reviewed by Johnson A., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (1), 61. Inside Intellectual Property e Best Practice in Intellectual Property Law, Jewess M., Management and Strategy, Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, 2013. Reviewed by Pigeon B. in CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (2), 129e130. Guidebook to Intellectual Property, Robin Jacob, Daniel Alexander and Matthew Fisher, 6th edn, Hart Publishing, 2013. Reviewed by Ouzman B., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (1), 62. 2. Journals The listing in this issue includes entries found using SciVerse ScopusÔ, Elsevier’s abstract and indexing database which gives access to almost 18,000 peer-reviewed titles from more than 5000 international publishers.
2.1. Search techniques, databases and analysis: classification: searcher certification 2.1.1. Search techniques, databases “Term clumping” for technical intelligence: A case study on dyesensitized solar cells. Zhang Y., Porter A.L., Hu Z., Guo Y., Newman N.C., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2013.12.019. A method of recognizing the root of an improved dependency tree for the Chinese patent literature. Zhu Y., Jin Y., Proceedings e 2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, 2012, 3, http://dx. doi.org/10.1109/CCIS.2012.6664638, 1517e1523. A proposed IPC-based clustering method for exploiting expert knowledge and its application to strategic planning.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001 0172-2190
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
2
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Chiu T.-F., Journal of Information Science, 2014, 40 (1), 50e66. A rule-based method for commas’ disambiguation in Chinese patent text. Song Q., Zhu Y., Wang L., Jin Y., Proceedings e 2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, 2012, 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCIS.2012.6664636, 1506e1510. A time-series-based technology intelligence framework by trend prediction functionality. Chen H., Zhang G., Lu J., Proceedings e 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/SMC.2013.593, 3477e3482. An image retrieval system for three-dimensional image. Lee C.-H., Lin J.-S., Proceedings of SPIE e The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2013, 8878, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12. 2032479. An ontology-based automatic semantic annotation approach for patent document retrieval in product innovation design. Wang F., Lin L.F., Yang Z., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 446e447, 1581e1590. Analysis and evaluation of terminology translation consistency in scientific and technical literature. Yin B., Yue X., Cai D., Zhang G., Proceedings e 2013 International Conference on Asian Language Processing, 2013, 6646009, 83e86. Analyzing topic drift in query expansion for Information Retrieval from a large-scale patent DataBase. Al-Shboul B., Myaeng S.-H., 2014 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing, 2014, 6741432, 177e182. Author name disambiguation in technology trend analysis using SVM and random forests and novel topic based features. Kastner S., Choi S.-P., Jung H., Proceedings e 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 2013, 6682413, 2141e2144. Concept suggestion based patent query method. Wu H.-T., Zhu H.-Z., Ma J.-H., Tan R.-H., Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2014, 20 (1), 79e88. CV-PCR: A context-guided value-driven framework for patent citation recommendation. Oh S., Lei Z., Lee W.-C., Mitra P., Yen J., International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505659, 2291e2296. Developing a patent landscape methodology. Smyth S.J., McPhee-Knowles S., Baker A., Phillips P.W.B., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2013, 3 (3), 251e266. Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975e2010). Li G.-C., Lai R., D’Amour A., Doolin D.M., Sun Y., Torvik V.I., Yu A.Z., Fleming L., Research Policy, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2014.01.012. Document clustering method using dimension reduction and support vector clustering to overcome sparseness. Jun S., Park S.-S., Jang D.-S., Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41 (7), 3204e3212. Effectiveness of text processing in patent documents visualization. Drazic M., Kukolj D., Vitas M., Pokric M., Manojlovic S., Tekic Z., SISY 2013 e IEEE 11th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Proceedings, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SISY. 2013.6662588, 287e291. Enriching patent search with external keywords: A feasibility study. Nikolova I., Temnikova I., Angelova G., International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP, 2013, 525e531. Identification of V þ N compound nouns in Chinese-English machine translation based on rules in patent texts.
Zhou H., Zhu Y., Jin Y., Proceedings e 2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, 2012, 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCIS.2012.6664632, 1485e1490. InSciTe adaptive: R&D decision support system for strategic foresight. Gim J., Jeong D.-H., Hwang M., Choi S.-P., Kim D.J., Lee S., Song S.-K., Jung H., Proceedings e 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/GreenCom-iThingsCPSCom.2013.428, 2249e2250. Label detection and recognition for uspto images using convolutional k-means feature quantization and ada-boost. Zhu S., Zanibbi R., Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, 2013, http://dx.doi. org/10.1109/ICDAR.2013.130, 633e637. Landscaping e a practitioner view. Roberts G., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2013, 3 (4), 313e317. Measuring closure properties of patent sublanguages. Temnikova I.P., Hailu N.D., Angelova G., Cohen K.B., International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP, 2013, 659e666. Patent keyword network analysis for improving technology development efficiency. Choi J., Hwang Y.-S., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 83 (1), 170e182. Proposal of a matching system for companies and researchers using patents and scientific papers. Yamada Y., Tansho T., Hirokawa S., Proceedings e 2nd IIAI International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics, 2013, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2013.55, 397e398. Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977e2004. Fontana R., Nuvolari A., Shimizu H., Vezzulli A., Research Policy, 2013, 42 (10), 1780e1792. Semantic analysis of Chinese prepositional phrases for patent machine translation. Hu R., Zhu Y., Jin Y., Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2013, 8202 LNAI, 333e342. Semantic title evaluation and recommendation based on topic models. Jin H., Zhang L., Du L., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2013, 7819 LNAI (PART 2), 402e413. Technology matching of the patent documents using clustering algorithms. Drazic M., Kukolj D., Vitas M., Pokric M., Manojlovic S., Tekic Z., CINTI 2013 e 14th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics, Proceedings, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/CINTI.2013.6705231, 405e409. The use of competitive intelligence in IP monetisation. Millien R., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (64), 80e85. Two stage genetic approach for bio-chemical named entity recognition. Ekbal A., Saha S., Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2013.6637260, 709e713. Uses unexpired patent to re-evaluate innovation performance by hindex and h-core indicators. Wang C.-C., Li Y.-T., Chen D.-Z., Huang M.-H., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641738, 965e971. Using multiple data source to enhance part-of-speech tagging for Chinese patent.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Qiu L., Zeng L., Kang S., ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 2014, 5 (1), 265e270. Using patent ontology engineering for intellectual property defense support system. Wu C.-Y., Trappey A.J.C., Trappey C.V., Advanced Concurrent Engineering, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4426-7-18, 207e217. Using query logs of USPTO patent examiners for automatic query expansion in patent searching. Tannebaum W., Rauber A., Information Retrieval, 2014, http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s10791-014-9238-7. Vacant technology forecasting using new Bayesian patent clustering. Choi S., Jun S., Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 2014, 26 (3), 241e251. 2.1.2. Analysis and statistics A comparative study of patent counts by the inventor country and the assignee country. Sung H.-Y., Wang C.-C., Chen D.-Z., Huang M.-H., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1192-4, 1e17. A method for partner selection in R&D collaboration between large companies and SMEs using patent information. Lee K.-E., Yoon B., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641747, 1886e1891. Absorptive capacity, knowledge flows, and innovation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Mukherji N., Silberman J., Journal of Regional Science, 2013, 53 (3), 392e417. An analysis of the patenting activities and collaboration among industry-university-research institutes in the Chinese ICT sector. Gao X., Guo X., Guan J., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (1), 247e263. Analysing knowledge capture mechanisms: Methods and a stylised bioventure case. Gurney T., Horlings E., van den Besselaar P., Sumikura K., Schoen A., Laurens P., Pardo D., Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8 (1), 259e272. Analysis of core and proximal technologies for electric vehicles in China. Jiang J., Suzuki J., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641750, 548e554. Analysis of the development and trends of nanotechnology in China’s market based on patent data. Zheng J., Gaojishu Tongxin/Chinese High Technology Letters, 2013, 23 (10), 1068e1076. Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: The case of Korean national R&D. Park H., Yoon J., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 853e890. Benchmarking the patent portfolio: A study of the Italian wind energy manufacturing industry. lo Storto C., Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 838e841, 3212e3217. Border sensitive centralities in patent citation networks using asymmetric random walks. Morrison G., Giovanis E., Pammolli F., Riccoboni M., Proceedings e 2013 International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SITIS. 2013.91, 546e552. Car2X-Communication mirrored by business method patents: What documented inventions can tell us about the future. Niemann H., Moehrle M.G., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641682, 976e984. Chinese patents on continuous catalytic reforming technologies and analysis. Zhao Y., Yao J., Dong L., Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2013, 43 (9), 61e64.
3
Collaborative networks and technology clusters e The case of nanowire. Ozcan S., Islam N., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 82 (1), 115e131. Constraints of internally and externally derived knowledge and the innovativeness of technological output: The case of the United States. Rosenzweig S., Mazursky D., Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31 (2), 231e246. Creating patents on the new technology using analogy-based patent mining. Jeong C., Kim K., Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41 (8), 3605e3614. Dynamic patterns of technological convergence in printed electronics technologies: Patent citation network. Kim E., Cho Y., Kim W., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 975e998. Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: a comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, copatents and co-publications. Wanzenbock I., Scherngell T., Brenner T., Annals of Regional Science, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0588-7, 1e32. Empirical analysis on evolution and small world effect of chinese enterpriseeenterprise patent cooperation network: From the perspective of open innovation. Ye C., Yu X., Li W., Information (Switzerland), 2013, 4 (4), 398e410. Exploring gender differences in patenting in Spain. Mauleon E., Daraio C., Bordons M., Research Evaluation, 2014, 23 (1), 62e78. Exploring knowledge diffusion among nations: a study of core technologies in fuel cells. Ho M.H.-C., Lin V.H., Liu J.S., Scientometrics, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-014-1265-z. Exploring technology opportunities in an industry via clustering method and association analysis. Chiu T.-F., Hong C.-F., Chiu Y.-T., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2013, 8083 LNAI, 593e602. Family firm density and regional innovation output: An exploratory analysis. Block J.H., Spiegel F., Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2013, 4 (4), 270e280. Federal research spending and innovation in the U.S. economy. Ngoie J.K., Journal of Policy Modeling, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.jpolmod.2014.01.010. Food packaging printing technology trend analysis: A patent analysis approach. Liu Y.J., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 469, 387e395. Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other: An ’Algorithmic Links with Probabilities’ approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity. Lybbert T.J., Zolas N.J., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (3), 530e542. How do the BRIC countries play their roles in the global innovation arena? A study based on USPTO patents during 1990e2009. Wang Y., Li-Ying J., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 1065e1083. How does firm size moderate firms’ ability to benefit from invention? Evidence from patents and scientific publications. Belenzon S., Patacconi A., European Management Review, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emre.12021. How fast do Chinese firms learn and catch up? Evidence from patent citations. Wang Y., Roijakkers N., Vanhaverbeke W., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (1), 743e761. Influences of counting methods on country rankings: a perspective from patent analysis. Zheng J., Zhao Z., Zhang X., Huang M.-h., Chen D.-z., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1139-9, 1e16.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
4
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Inter-cluster connectivity analysis for technology opportunity discovery. Kim B., Gazzola G., Lee J.-M., Kim D., Kim K., Jeong M.K., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1097-2, 1e15. International collaboration development in nanotechnology: A perspective of patent network analysis. Zheng J., Zhao Z.-Y., Zhang X., Chen D.-Z., Huang M.-H., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (1), 683e702. Knowledge characteristics and the dynamics of technological alliances in pharmaceuticals: empirical evidence from Europe, US and Japan. Krafft J., Quatraro F., Saviotti P.P., Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0338-8. Knowledge technological proximity: evidence from US and European patents. Aldieri L., Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2013, 22 (8), 807e819. Loosely-coupled networks of knowledge production and diffusion. Giudicati G., Riccaboni M., Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, 2013, 1, 245e253. Network structural analysis of technology: A study from patent perspective. Xu S., Wang X., Liu Z., Luan C., Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 2013, 4 (3), 214e235. Patent analysis and counter-measures for monitoring system of environmental nuclear radiation. Gu A.-M., Wang H.-J., Zhang J.-G., Zhang L.-X., Hedianzixue Yu Tance Jishu/Nuclear Electronics and Detection Technology, 2013, 33 (6), 770e774. Patent analysis in assessing supply chain management innovation. Suh C.-K., Recent Trends in Social and Behaviour Sciences e Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Interdisciplinary Behavior and Social Sciences 2013, 2014, 303e307. Patent applications as source for measuring technological performance. Sepulveda J., Paternina A., Suarez A., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 1385e1395. Patent applications on representative sectors of biotechnology in Brazil: An analysis of the last decade. Mendes L., Amorim-Borher B., Lage C., Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2013, 8 (4), 91e102. Patent-based study on rail transit development in China. Yang W.J., Han B.M., Lan Y.J., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 505e506, 609e612. Patents for technological trajectories understanding: The avionics case study. Aurelie B., Marc G., Didier R., AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference e Proceedings, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DASC. 2013.6712541, 2C41e2C49. Patents in nanotechnology: an analysis using macro-indicators and forecasting curves. Milanez D.H., de Faria L.I.L., do Amaral R.M., Leiva D.R., Gregolin J.A.R., Scientometrics, 2014, 1e16. Price-and policy-induced innovations: The case of U.S. biofuel. Jang H., Du X., Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2013, 38 (3), 299e311. Productivity and innovation: A spatial approach. Lamieri M., Sangalli I., Economia e Politica Industriale, 2013, 40 (2), 67e89. Profiling U.S. metropolitan regions by their social research networks and regional economic performance. Strumsky D., Thill J.-C., Journal of Regional Science, 2013, 53 (5), 813e833. R&D efficiency and the national innovation system: An international comparison using the distance function approach.
Hu J.-L., Yang C.-H., Chen C.-P., Bulletin of Economic Research, 2014, 66 (1), 55e71. Research on the technical fields distribution of patents licensing of Chinese firms in the next-generation information technology industry. Qiao Y.-Z., Liu S.-W., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 530e 531, 1142e1145. Study on patent analysis of titanium alloys. Wu J., Zhao C., Fu X., Tezhong Zhuzao Ji Youse Hejin/Special Casting and Nonferrous Alloys, 2013, 33 (11), 1045e1048. Studying MRI technology development using patent analysis. Luo R., Lin Y., Ding Q., Proceedings of the 2013 6th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2013.6746966, 373e377. Technological diversity and inventor networks. Cecere G., Ozman M., Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2014, 23 (2), 161e178. Technological impact factor: An indicator to measure the impact of academic publications on practical innovation. Huang M.-H., Huang W.-T., Chen D.-Z., Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8 (1), 241e251. Technological Relatedness and Knowledge Space: Entry and Exit of US Cities from Patent Classes. Rigby D.L., Regional Studies, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 00343404.2013.854878. Technology forecasting of green energy using patent analysis and simulation modeling. Jun S.H., Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 875e877, 1619e1624. Technology mapping of the underwater sensor networks by patent documents using two commercial software. De Melo A.A., Ribeiro G.L., Martinez M.E.M., Dos Reis P.C., Proceedings e 2013 Symposium on Computing and Automation for Offshore Shipbuilding, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NAVCOMP. 2013.14, 40e45. Technology-industry networks in technology commercialization: evidence from Korean university patents. Cho Y., Kim W., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-013-1131-4, 1e26. The Evolution Dynamic of a Cluster Knowledge Network: The Role of Firms’ Absorptive Capacity. Nicotra M., Romano M., Del Giudice M., Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2014, 5 (1), 70e93. The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case. Bonaccorsi A., Colombo M.G., Guerini M., Rossi-Lamastra C., Small Business Economics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-0139536-2, 1e27. The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative. Jung H.J., Lee J.J., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (1), 74e91. The patent information, strategic patent deployment thinking, and technology strategies of small and medium-sized enterprises. Chen S.-J., Su F.-P., Lai K.-K., Yang M.-T., Chang P.-C., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641726, 48e61. The role of text mining of patent in Mergers and Acquisitions. Huang L., Guo Y., Zhao Y., Wang Y., Porter A.L., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641687, 2271e2282. TRIZ evolution theory applied to man-made boards. Yu H.L., Liang H., Fan D.L., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 441, 1060e1063. University-owned and university-invented patents: a network analysis on two Italian universities.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Capellari S., De Stefano D., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-013-1211-5, 1e17. Using a text mining tool for patent analyses: Development of a new method for the repairing of gas turbines. Wich Y., Warschat J., Spath D., Ardilio A., Konig-Urban K., Uhlmann E., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641599, 1010e1016. Validating the usefulness of examiners’ forward citations from the viewpoint of applicants’ self-selection during the patent application procedure. Yasukawa S., Kano S., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s11192-013-1195-1, 1e15. Visualizing knowledge space: a case study of Chinese licensed technology, 2000e2012. Wang Y., Pan X., Wang X., Chen J., Ning L., Qin Y., Scientometrics, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1135-0, 1e20. 2.2. Patents 2.2.1. Relating to life sciences and pharmaceuticals Analyzing research publication patterns to gauge future innovation pathways for Nano-Enabled Drug Delivery. Zhou X., Porter A., Robinson D.K.R., Guo Y., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641731, 2188e2199. Articles 3(a) and 3(b) of the SPC regulation: and analysis. Berwal P.S., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (1), 29e38. Balancing the right to know and the privacy of the patent system: A case study of oncology medicines in Thailand. Yamabhai I., Smith R.D., International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 2013, 6 (4), 272e284. Bioethical ambition, political opportunity and the European governance of patenting: The case of human embryonic stem cell science. Salter B., Salter C., Social Science and Medicine, 2013, 98, 286e292. Biopiracy by law: European Union draft law threatens indigenous peoples’ rights over their traditional knowledge and genetic resources. Tobin B., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (2), 124e 136. Biotech patents and science policy: The Spanish experience. Belda I., Penas G., Alonso A., Marquina D., Navascues E., Santos A., Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32 (1), 59e61. Changes in global pharmaceutical patent strategy due to intergovernmental cooperation. Komatani T.S., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (2), 133e136. Commencement or completion: what constitutes a “human embryo” within the meaning of the EU Biotechnology Directive? Schacht H., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (1), 66e71. Drug safe harbour provisions in the USA and Europe: implications for the emerging biosimilars industry. Kretzschmar M.D., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (4), 298e311. Heterogeneities and patterns of innovations in life sciences sector: The case of stem cells employing patent families data. Xie Z., Sengoku S., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641749, 2502e2516. Human Capital, Social Collaboration, and Patent Renewal Within U.S. Pharmaceutical Firms. Liu K., Journal of Management, 2014, 40 (2), 616e636. Intellectual property rights and detached human body parts. Pila J., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2014, 40 (1), 27e32. Inter partes review: considerations for Abbreviated New Drug Application cases.
5
Carson P., Taylor S., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (2), 125e 127. International Stem Cell Corp v Comptroller General of Patents: The debate regarding the definition of the human embryo continues. O’Sullivan E., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (3), 155e163. Nature, nurture and DNA sequences. Ghosh S., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (1), 5e7. Novartis v Union of India and the person skilled in the art: a missed opportunity. Thambisetty S., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2014, 4 (1), 79e94. On the monopoly: Speculation, pharmaceutical markets, and intellectual property law in Nigeria. Peterson K., American Ethnologist, 2014, 41 (1), 128e142. Patent policies and provisions relating to pharmaceuticals in India. Nair G.G., Fernandes A., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 7e17. Patenting personalized medicines in the UK, Europe and USA. Parker S., Hall B., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (2), 163e 169. Patents on inventions related to human embryonic stem cells: the morality clause after Brüstle v. Greenpeace. Panis S., Medicine and law, 2013, 32 (3), 347e372. Pharmaceutical and biotech product patents in India: Doldrums or blissfulness? Chowdhury P., Khan S.A., Dutta P., Mahanta J., Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32 (2), 133e134. Recent pharmaceutical patent decisions in the United States. Baltatzis A., Marvin S., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 18e26. Strategies for patenting combination therapies: Proving nonobviousness is essential to obtaining patent protection. Toffenetti J.L., Chen C., Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 2013, 33 (21), 8e9. The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Intellectual Property Policy: stay the course (mostly). Mireles M.S., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 48e60. The complementary assets and appropriability affect patent commercialization on the moderate effect of marketing sensing capability: The case of bio-patents in Taiwan. Lin J.-H., Wang M.-Y., Lo H.-C., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641725, 871e879. The dynamic state of patents in regenerative medicine. Furman E., Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2013, 10 (5), 230e233. The future of prenatal molecular diagnostics: impact of the changing patent landscape. Rachinsky T.L., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (1), 1e3. The impact of patent protection and lack of generic competition on the right of access to medicines in South Africa: Explicating corporate responsibilities for human rights. Muswaka L., Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2014, 5 (2), 229e235. The Indian Supreme Court‘s judgment in the case of GlivecÒ e the uncertain future of pharmaceutical patents in India. Thikkavarapu P.R., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (2), 117e 119. The learning needs of the patent system and emerging technologies: A focus on synthetic biology. Thambisetty S., Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2014, (1), 13e39. The many means to an end: training methods in pharmaceutical and medical IP law.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
6
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Purcell N.S., Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst, 2014, 3 (1), 9e12. The new drugs war: Patents on drugs are in the interests of the sick as well as the industry. Protection should not be weakened. Economist (United Kingdom), 2014, 410 (8864). The patenting of biotechnological inventions in the EU, the judicial bodies involved and the objectives of the EU legislator. Aerts B.J., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (2), 88e94. The seeds of dispute: Vernon Hugh Bowman v. Monsanto company et al. Gambini E., European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2013, 4 (4), 579e 585. The tale of Viagra patents: Comparative studies of the global challenges in china and other countries. Liu Y., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 18 (6), 523e533. Transparency tools in gene patenting for informing policy and practice. Jefferson O.A., Kollhofer D., Ehrich T.H., Jefferson R.A., Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31 (12), 1086e1093. 2.2.2. Relating to software Dynamic competition in software development: how copyrights and patents, and their overlapping, impact on derivative innovation. Ghidini G., Arezzo E., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2013, 3 (4), 278e295. Ill-conceived, even if competently administered: Software patents, litigation, and innovation-A comment on Graham and Vishnubhakat. Miller S.P., Tabarrok A., Econ Journal Watch, 2014, 11 (1), 37e45. Trends in inter partes review and covered business method review. Gonsalves G.J., Beckett T.C., Leff B., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (64), 20e27. 2.2.3. Policy and strategic issues A framework of product innovative design process based on TRIZ and Patent Circumvention. Li M., Ming X., Zheng M., Xu Z., He L., Journal of Engineering Design, 2013, 24 (12), 830e848. A strategy for the bigger, simpler PPH system. Talbot-Ponsonby D., Blake S., Pediani S., Managing Intellectual Property, 2014, (236), 16e19. A structured approach to classifying evolutionary patterns of technology-driven business models: Hybrid analysis of co-word and citation approaches. No H.J., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641789, 2076e2082. A taxonomy of utility model patents application strategy. Hsueh C.-C., Luo Y.-C., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641754, 946e952. An application of patent strategy in medium-small enterprises product innovation process. Zhan J.-T., Yan J., 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Management System Innovation, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38427-1-173, 1633e1640. Applying International Patent Classification (IPC) to strategic planning processes of an R&D organization: The case of NECTEC, Thailand. Jotisakulratana M., Koomgun N., Virojrid R., Udomsaph B., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the ITDriven Services, 6641621, 1913e1918. Beyond the patents-prizes debate. Hemel D.J., Ouellette L.L., Texas Law Review, 2013, 92 (2), 303e382. Beyond the US borders: A primary analysis of extraterritorial application of US patent law.
Lei Z., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 27e32. How to innovate intellectual property service by prediction of infringement probability. Su H.-N., Kang C.-W., Lin J.-Y., Wu Y.-H., Lee M., Lee P.-C., Proceedings e 2013 5th International Conference on Service Science and Innovation, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSSI.2013.23, 186e192. Patent Licensing with Bertrand Competitors. Colombo S., Filippini L., Manchester School, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/manc.12050. Patents, Transaction Costs and Academic Research Project Choice. Jensen P.H., Webster E., Economic Record, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/1475-4932.12093. Running ahead in the nanotechnology gold rush. Strategic patenting in emerging technologies. Munari F., Toschi L., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 83 (1), 194e207. Strategic implications of AIA for IT entrepreneurs: A practical primer about the new patent world. Spivey W.A., Munson J.M., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 2013, 6641581, 1017e1031. Strategies for patenting “green” technologies in materials science. Vekris E., Materials Science and Technology Conference and Exhibition 2013, 3, 1766e1773. Strategies of the top global filers at the Indian Patent Office. Kurup A., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 29e 33. Study on influence factors of the implementation of enterprise patent strategy. Wang L., Lin Z., Wang H., Chen S., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641803, 972e 975. The driving force of university patent transaction: Evidence from twenty-six provinces of China. Zhang N., Gu X., Wang Y., Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40081-0_92, 1095e 1106. The economic value of patented inventions: Thoughts and some open questions. Gambardella A., International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2013, 31 (5), 626e633. The timing of using patent information by university scientists: A lesson from the biotechnology sector in Taiwan. Chang T.-Y., Li J.-R., Proceedings e 2013 5th International Conference on Service Science and Innovation, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/ICSSI.2013.44, 201e207. When do firms benefit from universityeindustry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination. Soh P.-H., Subramanian A.M., Journal of Business Venturing, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.11.001. 2.2.4. Other patent topics (When) Do stronger patents increase continual innovation? Chen Y., Pan S., Zhang T., Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2014, 98, 115e124. Advanced high strength steel tube diagrid using TRIZ and nonlinear pushover analysis. Lee D., Shin S., Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 96, 151e158. Afghanistan: the final frontier for patents. Kilday L., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 63e 68. An inside view to non-practicing entities business models: A case study.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Larson K., International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 2013, 6 (4), 294e315. Belated evidence of proof of use: Court of Justice of the European Union case law reviewed. Marten G., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (4), 287e291. Best mode disclosure in Canadian patents. Vaver D., Intellectual Property Journal, 2013, 25 (3), 303e333. Blocking blocks at the border: Examining standard-essential patent litigation between domestic companies at the ITC. Norris M., Minnesota Law Review, 2013, 98 (2), 713e744. Can competition law repair patent law and administrative procedures? AstraZeneca. Podszun R., Common Market Law Review, 2014, 51 (1), 281e294. Chinese patent explosion factors: An empirical analysis based on system and policy. Liu Y., Tan L., Song S.S., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641809, 1058e1069. Complementary patents and market structure. Schmidt K.M., Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2014, 23 (1), 68e88. Compulsory licensing: Implications on multinational drug companies. Prasad V., Babu P.S.S.K., International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 2013, 6 (4), 247e271. Did patents of introduction encourage technology transfer? Longterm evidence from the Spanish innovation system. Saiz P., Cliometrica, 2014, 8 (1), 49e78. Do NPEs matter? Non-practicing entities and patent litigation outcomes. Mazzeo M.J., Ashtor J.H., Zyont S., Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2013, 9 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht031, 879e904. Do patents affect VC financing? Empirical evidence from the nanotechnology sector. Munari F., Toschi L., International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0295-y, 1e22. European unitary patent: are we there yet? Ellyne E., Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2014, 4 (1), 57e78. Evaluating flexibility in international patent law. Rajec S.R.W., Hastings Law Journal, 2013, 65 (1), 153e211. Ex ante agreements in standard setting and patent-pool formation. Llanes G., Poblete J., Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2014, 23 (1), 50e67. Examining the determinants of drug launch delay in pre-TRIPS India. Bhaduri S., Brenner T., European Journal of Health Economics, 2013, 14 (5), 761e773. Expanding patent Law’s customer suit exception. Love B.J., Yoon J.C., Boston University Law Review, 2013, 93 (5), 1605e1641. Exploiting technological indicators for effective technology merger and acquisition (M&A) predictions. Yang C.-S., Wei C.-P., Chiang Y.-H., Decision Sciences, 2014, 45 (1), 147e174. Explore the new relationship between patents and market value: A panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach. Chen Y.-S., Shih C.-Y., Chang C.-H., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 1145e1159. Extracting value from IPR through patent brokerage. Benassi M.F., Geenen G.T., Economia e Politica Industriale, 2013, 40 (4), 89e116. Factors that influence the propensity to patent.
7
Perez-Cano C., Villen-Altamirano J., EMJ e Engineering Management Journal, 2013, 25 (3), 27e38. Finally a single European right for the EU? An analysis of the substantive provisions of the European Patent with Unitary Effect. Kaisi A., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (3), 170e 180. Framework design for an automated patent licensing negotiation system. Wang L., Liu X.-F., Li F., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641672, 2392e2396. FRAND’s forever: Standards, patent transfers, and licensing commitments. Kesan J.P., Hayes C.M., Indiana Law Journal, 2014, 89 (1), 231e314. Government sponsorship and nature of patenting activity of US universities and corporations. Drivas K., Economidou C., Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2013, 22 (8), 775e806. How a large biotechnology company teamed with a translation service provider to define best practices. Coombs J., Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2014, 20 (1), 49e 53. How much is a patent worth? Factor M., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 168e169. How to value IP portfolios for acquisition. Patel A., Germeraad P., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 57e62. Incentive effects from different approaches to holdup mitigation surrounding patent remedies and standard-setting organizations. Scott Kieff F., Layne-Farrar A., Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2013, 9 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht030, 1091e 1123. Innovative method by design-around concepts with integrating the algorithm for inventive problem solving. Chen W.-C., Chen J.L., Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2014, 28 (1), 201e211. Institutional and organizational factors associated to academic patenting in a Mexican university: Teams’ trajectories, networks and performance. Perez C.D., Aguilar J.A., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641784, 1032e1043. International harmonization of the grace period: the experience of Japan. Ishimaru S., Nakaya Y., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 61e74. International influence e TRIPS and patentable subject-matter. Hashim M.R., IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44 (6), 656e670. International patent systems strength 1998e2011. Papageorgiadis N., Cross A.R., Alexiou C., Journal of World Business, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.12.011. Inventor’s Knowledge Set as the Antecedent of Patent Importance. Mohammadi A., Franzoni C., Industry and Innovation, 2014, 21 (1), 65e87. Joint patent infringement following Akamai. Grow N., American Business Law Journal, 2014, 51 (1), 71e117. Akamai: Patent claims are now broader than the invention. Reinecke B.M., Wisconsin Law Review, 2013 (5), 1231e1262. Jurisdiction in disputes about infringements of intellectual property rights on the internet in view of recent ECJ case law. Bogdan M., Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 2013, 7 (2), 193e200. Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity among Japanese and US scientists.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
8
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Walsh J.P., Huang H., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (2), 245e260. Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Arora A., Belenzon S., Rios L.A., Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35 (3), 317e337. Market value of R&D, patents, and organizational capital: Finnish evidence. Rahko J., Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2013.864923. Missing the forest for the trolls. Lemley M.A., Melamed A.D., Columbia Law Review, 2013, 113 (12), 2117e2189. Novatis v Lee: a new method for calculating US patent term adjustment. Tridica A.C., Doherty E.A., Lechner J.D., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (2), 95e96. Organisational Change and the Institutionalisation of University Patenting Activity in Italy. Baldini N., Fini R., Grimaldi R., Sobrero M., Minerva, 2014, http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9243-9, 1e27. Patent cases and public controversies. Rinehart A.S., Notre Dame Law Review, 2013, 89 (1), 361e402. Patent law decisions from Supreme Courts: how can non-specialist judges decide this field of law? Smyth D., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 31e39. Patent life cycle: New evidence. Hikkerova L., Kammoun N., Lantz J.-S., Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013. 10.005. Patent nonuse and technology suppression: The use of compulsory licensing to promote progress. Tyler N.S., University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2014, 162 (2), 451e475. Patent storage study of cooperation between S&T-oriented small and micro enterprise and university in triple helix innovation based on short-supply-allowed EOQ model. Lai Q.F., Su S.B., Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 869e870, 1071e1074. Patent value analysis using support vector machines. Ercan S., Kayakutlu G., Soft Computing, 2014, 18 (2), 313e328. Patents and plausibility. England P., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (1), 22e30. Patents and the dissemination of inventions. Alderucci D., Baumol W.J., Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2013, 27 (4), 223e224. Pooling with essential and nonessential patents. Quint D., American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2014, 6 (1 D), 23e57. Pre-empted patents, infringed patents and firms’ participation in markets for technology. Grimpe C., Hussinger K., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (3), 543e554. Private value of patent right and patent infringement: An empirical study based on patent renewal data of china. Zhang G., Lv X., Zhou J., China Economic Review, 2014, 28, 37e54. Recent moves to enhance the quality of patents in China. Mak T., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (2), 99e101. Research on the effects of regional R&D cooperation among enterprises, universities and research institutes on their innovation performance in China. Li B., Zhang N., Liu F., Proceedings of 2013 6th International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2013, 1, 6702948, 356e361. Review of patent cases in the English courts in 2013.
Cordery B., Adair D., Hazenberg N., Delbeuf S., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (2), 76e91. Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth. Cozzi G., Galli S., Journal of Economic Growth, 2013, http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10887-013-9101-5, 1e37. Simplifying multiactor patent infringement cases through proper application of common law doctrine. Oswald L.J., American Business Law Journal, 2014, 51 (1), 1e69. Spain’s action against the EU patent package: arguments and counter-arguments in case C-146/13. Tilmann W, European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (1), 4e8. Standards-essential patents: A prolegomena. Pai Y., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 59e66. Study on regional difference of three type patent’s economic contribution. Wang L., Li H., Proceedings of 2013 6th International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2, 6703247, 97e100. Technical standards and patent pools: Antecedents, formation and distinctions. Wang J., Peng X., Song W., Zhang X., Song X., Yao Y., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 18 (6), 511e522. Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value e An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions. Fischer T., Leidinger J., Research Policy, 2014, 43 (3), 519e529. The brokered patent market in 2013. Richardson K., Oliver E., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 11e19. The complex and debated role of NPEs in the patent system. Schwartz D.L., Kesan J.P., Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 2014, (63), 21e26. The determinants of academic patenting by Italian universities. Rizzo U., Ramaciotti L., Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.882502. The diminishing signaling value of patents between early rounds of venture capital financing. Hoenen S., Kolympiris C., Schoenmakers W., Kalaitzandonakes N., Research Policy, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01. 006. The duty to disclose “the invention”: the wrong tool for the job. Siebrasse N., Intellectual Property Journal, 2013, 25 (3), 269e301. The European Commission policy towards the licensing of standard-essential patents: Where do we stand? Geradin D., Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2013, 9 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht036, 1125e1145. The European patent: An old and vexing problem. Pila J., International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2013, 62 (4), 917e940. The impact of small world on patent productivity in China. Zhang G., Guan J., Liu X., Scientometrics, 2014, 98 (2), 945e960. The impact of the evolution of relationship between technical standards and patents on technical innovation. Ai-Ping T., TingeTing S., Feng L., Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2014, 7 (2), 214e220. The interpretation-construction distinction in patent law. Chiang T.-J., Solum L.B., Yale Law Journal, 2013, 123 (3), 530e614. The patent eligibility of graphene claims following the U.S. supreme court’s myriad decision. Terzoli Jr. R.S., Gervasi C.N., Haag T., Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2013, 10 (2), 123e131. The patent policy debate in the high-techworld. Gupta K., Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2013, 9 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht039, 827e858. The progress to date with the Unitary European patent and the unified patent court for Europe.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Cook T., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013,18 (6), 584e588. The smartphone patent wars saga: availability of injunctive relief for standard essential patents. Fröhlich M., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 156e159. The trouble with treble damages: Ditching patent law’s willful infringement doctrine and enhanced damages. Means S.C., University of Illinois Law Review, 2013, 2013 (5), 1999e 2045. What are the channels for technology sourcing? Panel data evidence from German companies. Harhoff D., Mueller E., Van Reenen J., Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2014, 23 (1), 204e224. IPR, IPR Awareness among MSMEs in India. Rao K.S., Noorinasab A.R., IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 2013, 15 (2), 13e21. What the supreme court’s myriad decision means for nanotechnology patents. Baluch A.S., Maebius S.B., Wegner H.C., Nanotechnology Law and Business, 2013, 10 (2), 132e137. Why do juries decide if patents are valid? Lemley M.A., Virginia Law Review, 2013, 99 (8), 1673e1736. 2.3. Trademarks and domain names 2.3.1. Trademarks Drug commodity name protection e a pitfall in China’s new revised trademark law? Zhu N., World Intellectual Property Report, 2013, 27 (12), 30e32. European trade mark law: registrable signs, service marks. von Mühlendahl A., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (2), 160e164. Information in the mark and the marketplace: A multivocal account. Duguid P., Enterprise and Society, 2014, 15 (1), 1e30. Marking your trade: Cultural factors in the prolongation of trademarks. Melnyk V., Giarratana M., Torres A., Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67 (4), 478e485. Morality tales e trade marks and the religious word. Chaudri A., Joy D., CIPA Journal, 2014, 43 (1), 20e22. Repeated filings of a European Community trade mark. Stumpf K., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (3), 225e230. Substantial value rule: How it came into being and why it should be abolished. Gielen C., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (3), 164e 169. The devil wears trademark: How the fashion industry has expanded trademark doctrine to its detriment. Harvard Law Review, 2014, 127 (3), 995e1016. The notion of famous, well-known trade marks and marks with repute compared. Naser M.A, Hammouri T.M., Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, 9 (4), 312e321. The Rooibos rush. Jooste C., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (1), 1e3. Trade marks and national flora: an analysis of EU law concerning the possibility of registering names of plants as trade marks. Coelho L.T., Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2014, (1), 71e94. Trademark families: Characteristics and market values. Block J.H., Fisch C., Sandner P.G., Journal of Brand Management, 2014, 21 (2), 150e170. Trademark image retrieval based on scale, rotation, translation invariant features.
9
Nguyen T.D., Nguyen H.H.H., Le T.H., Proceedings e 2013 RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies: Research, Innovation, and Vision for Future, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/RIVF.2013.6719908, 282e285. 2.4. Designs Design patents for animated images: Development trends. Chen R., Shen S.-Y., Tan S.-P., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 19 (1), 43e48. The informed user in design law: what should he compare and how should he make the comparison. Geerts P.G.F.A., European Intellectual Property Review, 2014, 36 (3), 181e185. Determining design patent similarity based on the ordinary observer test. Chen R., Kuo H.-T., Wang M.-H., Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, 18 (6), 548e-555. 2.5. Other IP; general IP issues 2.5.1. Policy and strategic issues Two emerging innovative dragons: An analysis of the IPR strategy of China’s Huawei and ZTE. Godinho M.M., Ferreira V., 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, 6641578, 1044e 1057. 2.5.2. Other IP issues Beyond unbridled optimism and fear: Indigenous peoples, intellectual property, human rights and the globalisation of traditional knowledge and expressions of folklore: Part II. Picart C.J.S., Fox M., International Community Law Review, 2014, 16 (1), 3e37. Intellectual Property puts art.6(1) Brussels Regulation to the test. Torremans P., Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2014, (1), 1e12. Intellectual property rights, southern innovation and foreign direct investment. Mathew A.J., Mukherjee A., International Review of Economics and Finance, 2014, 31, 128e137. What impact does intellectual property have on the business performance of technology firms. Willoughby K.W., International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 2013, 6 (4), 316e338. What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is mine too: Converging U.S. intellectual property exhaustion doctrines. Dennis J.K.P., Computer Law and Security Review, 2014, 30 (1), 55e 66. 2.6. Historical Behind the scenes of Scottish researches into agar supply during the 1940s. Moore P.G., Archives of Natural History, 2013, 40 (2), 228e243. From patents to stock buffering schemes: The historical evolution of the international aluminium cartels (1886e1945). Bertilorenzi M., Revue Economique, 2013, 64 (6), 1145e1169. Patents, what for? The case of Crossley Brothers and the introduction of the gas engine into Spain, c. 1870e1914. Ortiz-Villajos J.M., Business History, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/00076791.2013.837890. The Spark of invention. Andrews C., Engineering and Technology, 2013, 8 (9), 68e69. Investigation of historical hard rubber ornaments of Charles Goodyear.
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001
10
Literature listing / World Patent Information xxx (2014) 1e10
Raue M., Wambach M., Gloggler S., Grefen D., Kaufmann R., Abetz C., Georgopanos P., Handge U.A., Mang T., Blumich B., Abetz V., Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 215 (3), 245e254. Patent pools and innovation in substitute technologies-evidence from the 19th-century sewing machine industry. Lampe R., Moser P., RAND Journal of Economics, 2013, 44 (4), 757e 778.
David Newton Crooked Thatch, East End, Hook Norton, Banbury OX15 5LG, United Kingdom E-mail address: [email protected]. Available online xxx
Please cite this article in press as: Newton D, Literature listing, World Patent Information (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2014.04.001