Longipinene derivatives from Stevia lucida and S. triflora

Longipinene derivatives from Stevia lucida and S. triflora

Phytochemlstry, Vol 27, N o 5, pp 1409-1412, 1988 P n n t e d m G r e a t Britain 0031 9422/88 $ 3 0 0 + 0 0 0 P e r g a m o n Press plc LONGIPINE...

268KB Sizes 0 Downloads 41 Views

Phytochemlstry, Vol

27, N o 5, pp 1409-1412, 1988 P n n t e d m G r e a t Britain

0031

9422/88 $ 3 0 0 + 0 0 0 P e r g a m o n Press plc

LONGIPINENE DERIVATIVES FROM STEVIA L U C I D A A N D S. TRIFLORA*

J. MANUELAMARO, MARICELA ADRIAN, CARLOS M. CERDA~"and

PEDRO JOSEPH-NATHANt

Instltuto de Investlgaclonesde la Facultad de Farmacm, ULA, M6nda, Venezuela-5101,"?Departamentode Quimlca del Centro de Investlgac16ny de Estu&os Avanzados, Instltuto Poht6cmco Naoonal, Apartado 14-740, M6xlco, D F, 07000 M6xlco (Rewsed recewed 20 August 1987) Key Word Index--Stewa luc~da, S tr~flora, Cornposltae, Eupatoneae, sesqulterpenes,longlpmene derivatives.

Abstract--The aerial parts of Stewa luclda afforded longlpm-2-ene-7fl-angeloyloxy-9ct-acetyloxy-l-one,while the aerial parts of S. trlflora gave rastevione, 2-dehydrorastevlone and the new natural longipmene, tnflorestevlone The structure of triflorestevlone was estabhshed on the basis of chemical and spectral evidences, Single crystal X-ray analysis of longlpm-2-ene-7fl-angeloyloxy-9ct-hydroxy-l-oneconfirmed the structure of the constituent of S. luctda.

..oR,

INTRODUCTION

In the course of our chemical research on species from the Andean flora of Venezuela, we have already reported 1-1,2] the isolanon and identification of pectolinaringenln, eupatolitm and labdan-13(Z)-en-8g-ol-15-olc acid from Stewa luctda. In this paper we report the isolation of longtpin-2-ene-7fl-angeloyloxy-9~-acetyloxy1-one (1) 1-3] from S. lucida and of 2-dehydrorastevlone (6) [4-6], rastevlone (8) [7] and the new natural longlpmene, mflorestewone (9) from S. tr~ora. The relevant hterature about longlpinenes has been recently reviewed [8].

.oAo,

tt

'~~OR'

"

1

R ~ = Ang

2 3

R ' = R~ = H R ) = Ang R~ = H

- ~

Ra = Ac

"'OH

4 ~

G

RESULTS A N D D I S C U S S I O N

Chromatography of the ethanohc extracts of the aerial parts of S. luc~da yielded a compound which was Identified as longipin-2-ene-7fl-angeloyloxy-9~-acetyloxy-1one (1) r3] from its spectral properties, although tt was obtained as white needles with mp 123-125 ° instead of the colourless off previously reported [3]. Furthermore, treatment of 1 with methanolic potassium hydroxide under reflux gave longlpin-2-ene-7fl,9~&ol-l-one (2) [6], whde controlled alkahne hydrolysis of 1 gave the monoester 3. That the angeloyl group is at C-7 is readdy deduced from its IH NMR spectrum where the multiphclty of H-7 corresponds to a double doublet, whde that of H-9 corresponds to a triplet I-6] When 3 was converted by Jones' reagent to the dlketone 5, the presence of the C-9 keto group was further evidenced since the 13C NMR signals of C-8 and C-10 were shifted to lower fields (Table 1). A sample of 3 was directly compared by Bohlmann et al with a longlpmene to which they assigned structure 4 1-4,9], but it seems that is more properly represented by 3 1-6, 7, 10-1. Cogent evidence that confirms the structure of 1 was obtained from a smgle crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 3 The results also corroborate the relative stereochemistry, and from the known absolute stereochemlstry * Part 5 m the series 'Phytochemtcal Stu&es on the Venezuela Andean Flora' For Parts 3 and 4 see refs [1, 2].

.

~

Ang

l ~lOAng v

-~

-OAng

6

~

.

O

1 A !

~,, ,,o~

..o.

"' ~"'''""/~"~

H

~OAng

8

R ~ = R2 = Ang

9

R t = R 2 = TIgl

I0

R ~ = R a = Mebut

7

[ 11] of 2, the correct molecular perspective can be drawn as shown in Fig I. The molecular conformation is essentially equal to that of rastevione (8), which has already been discussed in detail I-7, 11]. Repeated chromatography of the methanohc extracts of the aerial parts of S triflora yielded 2-dehydrorastevione (6), rastevlone (8) and triflorestevione (9) Bromlnation of 8 with TBDC [12] afforded 2fl-bromorastevione (7) m almost quantitative yields. Treatment of 7 with DBU [ 13] gave synthetic 2-dehydrorastevione (6), ldent-

1409

1410

J M AMARO et al

~cal to the n a t u r a l p r o d u c t . Since the s t r u c t u r e o f rastev~one (8) ~s k n o w n [7], th~s c h e m i c a l t r a n s f o r m a t i o n allows us to assign the s t r u c t u r e o f 6, prevtously f o r m u l a t e d as long~pm-2-ene-8/~,9c~-dlangeloyloxy-7/3-hydroxy- 1o n e [5] a n d later as longlpm-2-ene-8~,9/~-dlangeloyloxy7 ~ h y d r o x y q - o n e [4] T h e spectral p r o p e m e s of'9 closely r e s e m b l e d t h o s e o f r a s t e w o n e (8) [7]. C o m p a r i s o n o f the ~ H N M R a n d ~CNMR o f b o t h c o m p o u n d s (see T a b l e 1 a n d E x p e r imental) indicates [14] the only d~fference being the r e p l a c e m e n t of the angeloyl g r o u p s o f 8 by t~gloyl g r o u p s Thus, 9 ~s the d~t~glate a n a l o g u e o f r a s t e v t o n e a n d m a c c o r d a n c e w~th n s o n g m ~t has been n a m e d tr~florestev~one D w e c t c o r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n 8 a n d 9 was e s t a b h s h e d t h r o u g h the d e r l v a u v e 10 ( t s o m e n c m~xture), i n d e p e n dently o b t a i n e d by catalytic h y d r o g e n a t i o n of b o t h 8 a n d 9 EXPERIMENTAL

Mps uncorr UV spectra were recorded m MeOH and IR spectra m films or KBr pellets 1H and ~ C NMR spectra were measured m CDC13 w~th TMS as mt standard EIMS were recorded at 70 eV TLC was camed out on 0 25 mm layers of slhca gel PF:~4 (Merck) CC as performed w~th s~hca gel 60 (70-230 mesh) Plant matertal S luc~da Lagasca was collected at P~.ramo de La Negra, near Et delgad~to (M6nda, Venezuela) m November, 1978 S trtflora DC at Gav~dm, Dlstmo Rangel (Menda, Venezuela) m November, 1982 Voucher specimens of both (JMA 1503 and JMA 1511, respec~vely) are deposited at the Herbarmm M E R F of the Faculty of Pharmacy (ULA)

Extraction and zsolatton of compounds Aerial parts of S luclda were extracted and chromatographed as reported previously [1] Fractions eluted with petrol-EtOAc (9 t) yielded 1 (1 6 g) Aerial parts of S trlflora (~a 7 kg) were air-dried, ground and extracted exhaushvely v, nh MeOH m a Soxhlet The residue (470 g) left after remc~ al of tlre sol~ent ~rr ~a~ l ~ was chroma~-ographed over slhca gel (1 7 kg) and eluted wnh petrol EtOAc mlxts of increasing polarity Fractions of 500 ml were taken and combined based upon TLC monitoring, affording the following combinations Fractions 1 5 (petrol), 6 18 (petrol EtOAc, 9 t), 19-25 (petroI-EtOAc, 4 1~, 26~43 (petrol-FtOAc. 7 3). 44-56 (petrol-EtOAc, 3 2), 57 70 (petrol EtOAc, 1 1), 71 81 (petrol-EtOAc, 1 4), 82 90 (FtOAc, 100%), 91-110 IEtOAc MeOH, 1 4~ Fractions 26 43112 g, four spots on TLC) were rechromatographed by (CC C~,H6-EtOAc, 9 11 glwng crude rastevlone (~a 7 gl and a mlxt of 6 and 9 Prep TLC of this mlxt (Coil 0-EtOAc, 19 1, multiple development) yielded pure 6 (~a 400 mg) and 9 (~a 250 rag) Lonqlpm-2-ene-7fl-anqeloy, lo~v-9:~-acetylo.,o,-1-Olle it) [3] White needles from EtOAc, mp 123 125 [~]D + 19 4 ~ (EtOAc, 171 IRv~,~cm ~ 1730. 1710 1675, 1615, 1240, 860 UV2~]~mnm 216,251 1HNMR(300 MHz) b093(3H, s, H131, 1 (X) (3H, ~, H-141, I 07 (3H, s, H-121, 1 88 (3H, qum. J = 1 5 Hz, Me-5 angelate), 1 97 (3H. dq, J = 6 5 and I 5 Hz, Me-4 angelate), 206 (3H, d, J = 1 5 H7, H-I51 2 13 (IH, m, H-8~), 2 16 (IH, ddd, J , 8~= 12, J ~ 8~= 15, J ~ ,~=3 Hz, H-8~q), 2 18 (3H, s, Ac), 232 (1H, s, H-5), 264 (1H, d, J4. 11 = 7 H/, H-41, 3 18 [1H, dd, J 2 1 ~ = 1 5 a n d J , . . ~ = 7 H z , H-11),499(IH, t , J - 3 5 H z , H9),50511H, dd, J = l l and3 Hz, H - 7 ) , 5 8 1 ( l H , m , J = 1 5 H z , H2) and 605 ppm (IH, qq, J - 6 5 and 1 5H7, H-3 angelate) 3CNMR, seeTablel F I M S m ' z ( r e l rot) 374[M]~ (48),314 (1 2)~ 291 (9 3)~ 274(41/), 249 (2 21 2~,2(1_8 3L2!4 (2Z~,)~ t99 (22 t),

Table 1 13C NMR chemical shifts (20 MHz, CDCI3-TMS) for compounds !, 3, 5 7 and 9 C

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

3

5

202.7(`,) 122 6 (d) 170 5 (s) 48 4 (d) 65 7 (d) 37.2(`,) 72 51d) 32 1 (t) 75 1 (d) 55 5 (s) 53 6 (d) 26 1 (q) 23 3 (q) 21 31q) 190 (q)

203 4 (s) 122 6 (d) 170 61s) 48 8 (d) 66 I (d) 374(s) 72 5(d) 35 7(t) 73 1 (d) 57 3 (s) 52 9 (d) 26 2(q) 23 3 (q) 21 7(q) 19 21q)

200 8 (s) 122 1 (d) 169 41s) 49 9 (d) 65 4(d) 383(,`,) 7501d) 42 8(t) 208 2 (s) 64 3 (s) 56 5 (d) 25 5(q) 24 6 (q) 204 (q) 174(q)

1'

166 8 (s)

1672 (s)

166 2(s)

2'

137 6(d)

137 9 (d)

3'

127 81s)

12791`,)

methyl signals

6

7

9

201 31s) 122 9 (d) 169 5 (s) 48 3 (d) 65 71d) 36 51~) 71 01d)* 70 2 (d)* 75 2 (d) 5541s) 524 (d) 2641q) 22 9 (q) 21 5(q) 20 2 (q)~" 166 21s) 16601s)

202 4 (s) 520(d)t 30 8 (d) 45 7 (d) 46 71d) 35 21s) 70 91d)* 7041d)* 75 I (d) 44 0(s) 51 9(d)+ 2691q) 20 9 (q) 20 1 (q)~ 20 I (q)~ 1660(s) 165 81s)

211 0(`,) 42 0(t) 27 0(dj 44 5 (d) 46 61d) 35 2(s) 7l 6(d)* 71 2(d)* 75 3 (d) 45 9 (,~) 5t 7(d) 2701q) 20 3 (q) 19 8 (q) 19 61q) 166 5 (s) 166 41s)

13801d)

1394(d) 139 t (d)

140 1 (d) 139 3 (d)

138 31d) 137 2(d)

127 41s)

127 2(s) 1271(,,}

127 51~) 127 3 (~s} 1571q) 15 61q) 20 312q)~

128 61s) 1279(s)

4'

157(q)

158(q)

15 6(q)

15 6(2q)

5' OAc

20 5 (q} 170 1 (s) 21 0 (q)

206 (q)

204 (q)

200(2q)t

* t ~Asslgnments bearing the same sign may be interchanged

14 1 (2q) I1 6(2q)

Long~pmene derivatives from Stewa 177 (25 1), 173 (18 5), 145 (11.7), 135 (24.4), 122 (22.8), 83 (100), 69 (15 9), 55 (9.7), 43 (10.2). Alkahne hydrolyszs ofl A soln of I (300 mg) m hot M e O H was refluxed wxth 1.8 g of K O H dissolved m HzO. After 1 hr, the mlxt was dlld with H 2 0 and extracted with CHCI 3 The orgamc layer was washed with HCI (5%) and H20, dried over MgSO 4, filtered and evapd to dryness The restdue was crystalhzed from petrol-EtOAc yielding 70 mg of longlpm-2-ene-Tfl,9ct-&hydroxy1-one (2) [6], mp 184-186 °, [trio +41,8 (EtOH, c0.32) ElMS m/z(rel, m t ) 232 (4.0), 189 (23 1), 173 (22 5), 161 (27~6), 149 (40.9), 135 (64 9), 122 (100), 107 (25.7), 91 (31.4), 55 (30 7), 41 (45 4), 28 (77.9). Parttal alkahne hydrolysis of 1. To a soln of 1 (400 mg) m cold MeOH (20ml) was added 2 4 g of aq KOH and the maxt stirred for 5 mm at 0 ° (the time and temp of this reaction was prevtously momtored by TLC with smaller amounts of 1) The reachon mlxt was treated as prewously and the restdue crystalhzed from petrol-EtOAc, giving 290 mg of longlpm-2-ene-7fl-angeloyloxy9ct-hydroxy-l-one (3), mp 147-149 °, [~t]v+45 3 (EtOAc, cO 64). IRvZ~a~cm -~' 3445, 1700, 1660, 1625, 840. UVAMm:°n nm 216, 251 1 H N M R (300 MHz) 6093 and 107 (3H each, 2s, 9emdimethyl group), 1 12 [3H, s, H-14), 1.90 (3H, qum J = 1.5 Hz, Me-5 angelate), 1 96 (1H, d, J 0 . o n = 3 Hz, OH), 200 (1H, ddd, ,/7. B~=2, Js~.s~=15 and ,/s~.9=3 Hz, H-8~), 202 (3H, dq, J = 6 5 and 1.5 Hz, Me-4 angelate), 2 04 (3H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-15), 2.27 (1H, ddd, J7. s#=12, J s , . s p = 1 5 and ,/8~.90=3 Hz, H-8), 229 (1H, s, H-5), 2.57 (1H, d, J4. ~a = 7 5 Hz, H-4), 3.13 (1H, dd, '/2. H = 1 . 5 and J4.11=7-5Hz, H-11), 388 (1H, q, Jsa, 9 -~'/a#, 9 ~ ')9. OH 3 8 Hz, H-9), 5 10 (1H, dd, '/7. so = 12 Hz and JT, s~=2 Hz, H-7), 580 (1H, m, J = l . 5 Hz, H-2) and 6.10 ppm (1H, qq, , / = 6 5 and 1 5 Hz, H-3 angelate ~3CNMR, see Table 1 ElMS m/z (rel. m t ) 332 [M] + (04), 249 (2 7), 232 (5 5), 135 (22 1), 122 (24.7), 83 (100), 55 (49.3), 28 (39 7) X-Ray analysts Single crystals of 3 were grown by slow crystalhzation from CHzCI2-hexane They were orthorhomblc, space group p2t2121 with a=8.8746 (40), b = 1 3 5999 (81), c = 15 6960 (68) ~, and d~a~= 1.17 g/cm 3 for Z = 4 (M, 332.48) The mtensRy data were measured on a N~colet R3m four-c~rcle d~ffractometer with CuK~ monochromated radiation in the 0:20 scan mode The size of the crystal used for data collection was ca :

1411

0 58 x 0 28 × 0 24 mm 3 No absorption correctxon was necessary ( # = 6 5 c m -1) A total of 1414 reflectxons was measured for 3 ° < 0 < 110 °, of whtch 1342 reflections were considered to be observed [ 1 > 3 ( I ) ] The structure was solved by the &rect method using the software provided by the manufacturer and refined by full-matrix least-squares assuming the amsotroplc temperature factors for non-hydrogen atoms and the motroplc ones for hydrogen atoms The final discrepancy ln&ces were R = 7 38% using a umt weight for 1339 reflechons The final dtfference Fourier map was essenttally featureless, the h~ghest residual peaks having densities of 0.4 e/A 3 Lists containing atomic coordmates and thermal parameters, bond &stances, bond angles, amsotrop~c temper0ture factors, hydrogen atom coordinates and comparison of the observed and calculated structure factors have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographlc Data Centre Oxidation of 3 wtth `/ones' reagent Compound 3 (250 rag) was dissolved m Me2CO (20 ml) at 0 ° and Jones' reagent (8 ml) added dropwtse The soln was stirred for 1 hr at 0 ° and then stored at room temp overntght Excess reagent was destroyed with MeOH, the soln filtered and concd at red pres The residue was extracted with EtOAc, dried (Na2SO4), evapd to dryness and chromatographed on a silica gel column C6H6-EtOAc, 19:1) Crude 5 was p.unfied by prep TLC (C6H6) and crystalhzed from C6H6-hexane, giving 190 mg of longlpm-2-ene-7/L angeloyloxy-l,9-&one (5), mp 118-120 ° I R v ~ c m -~ 3050, 1720, 1700, 1678, 1625, 1235, 858 U V 2 ~ ] ° n n m 204, 218, 254 ~H N M R (80 MHz), 60 85 and 0 93 (each 3H, s, 9em-&methyl), 095 (3H, s, H-14), 1 70 (3H, qd, , / = 1 5 Hz, Me-5 angelate), 1 75 (3H, dd, ,/=6 5 and 1 5 Hz, Me-4 angelate), 1 90 (3H, d, , / = 1 5 Hz, H-15), 2 18 (1H, s, H-5), 2 50-3 20 (4H, br, H-4, H-8, H-8' and H-11),485(1H, dd,,/=ll and 1.5 Hz, H-7), 5 60 (1H, m , , / = 1 5 Hz, H-2) and 5 90 ppm (1 H, dq, , / = 6 5 and 1 5 Hz, H-3 angelate) 13CNMR, see Table 1 2-Oehydrorastewone (6) [4-6] Colourless off. IR Vfm'~"~era-1 3450, 1750, 1680, 865 U V 2 ~ x ° n n m : 217, 252 1 H N M R (80 MHz) 60.85 and 1.18 (each 3H, s, #ern-&methyl), 1 10 (3H, s, H-14), 1 73 (6H, m, 3"= 1 5 Hz, Me-4 angelate), 1 80 (6H, dq, d =6.5 and 1 5 Hz, Me-5 angelate), 200 (3H, d, ,/= 1 5 Hz, H-15), 2.25(1H, s,H-5),2 62(1H, d,,/=6 Hz, H-4),3 18 (1H, d , , / = 6 Hz,

OQC9 {;10 016

Fig. I.

C19

1412

J M AMARO et al

H-I 1), 3 78 (1 H, d, J = 1 5 Hz, H-9), 5.46 (2H, br s, H-7 and H-8), 5 74 (IH, m, J = 1 5 Hz, H-2) and 602 ppm (2H, dq, J = 6 5 and 1 5 Hz, H-3 angelate) 13CNMR, see Table 1. EIMS m/z (rel mt) 330 (1 4), 247 (1 0), 230 (2 8), 219 (2 5), 202 (2 7), 201 (6 3), 187 (3 6), 175 (4 0), 149 {3 1), 135 (3 9), 122 {337), 109 (4 2), 83 (100), 55 (56 2) Brommatgon of 8 with TBDC To a soln of 8 (350 mg) in dry EtzO were added 340 mg of TBDC (2,4,4,6-tetrabromocyclohexan-2,5-dlenone) and the mlxt stirred for 3 hr at room temp The Et20 soln was extd with aq NazCO 3, washed and dried (NazSO4) The residue obtained after evapn of solvent was purified by prep TLC (CoH6-EtOAc, 9 l, double development) yielding 250rag of 2[~-bromorastewone (7), colourless off IRv~',~cm ~ 3440, 1680, 1640, 765 U V ) . ~ ] ° n n m 205, 230 ~H NMR (80 MHz) 6095 and 1 10 (each 3H, s, qem-dlmethyl), I 02 (3H, s, H-14), 1 24 (3H, d, J = 7 Hz, H-15), 1 75 (6H, m, J = 1 5 Hz, Me-5 angelates), 1 90 (6H, qd, J = 6 5 and 1 5 Hz, Me-4 angelates), 2 11)-2 80 (2H, m, H-3 and H-4), 2 45 (1H, s, H-5), 3 30 (IH, d , J = 6 Hz, H-II),3 75(IH, s,H-9),4 53(IH, d , J = S Hz, H2), 5 46 (2H, br s. H-7 and H-8) and 6 05 ppm (2H, dq, J = 6 5 and 1 5 Hz, H-3 angelates) 13C NMR, see Table 1 Dehydrobrommatlon oJ 7 u,tth DBU A soln of compound 7 (200 mg) in DMSO was treated with an eqmmolecular amount of DBU (1,5-dmzablcyclo[5 4 0]undecen-5-ene) and heated at 85' during 3 hr The residue left after m vacuo removal of solvent was chromatographed by prep TLC (C6H6-EtOAc, 4 1) yielding 150 mg of an oil ldent~cal to natural 2-dehydrorastevtone (6) Trtfloresteltone (9) Colourless oil IR v ~ c m - 1 3450, 1725, 1710, 1630, 1270, 750 UV2mM,~°nnm 208, 230 ~HNMR (80 MHz) 60 76, 0 89 and 0 97 (each 3H, s, oem-dlmethyl and H-14), 1 09 (3H, d, J = 7 Hz, H-15), 1 66 (12H, apparent br s, tlgloyl Me's hydrogens), 2 98 (1 H, d, J = 6 Hz, H- I 1), 3 70 (1 H, d, J = 1 5 Hz, H-9), 5 38 (6H, br 7, H-7 and H-8) and 6 67 ppm (2H, qq, J = 7 and I 5 Hz, H-3 tlglates) I3CNMR see Table 1. EIMS m/z (rel lnt) 332 (08), 309 (04), 281 (06), 249 (05), 232 (l 9), 217 (2 1), 203 (3 4), 189 (2 8), 177 (3 2), 165 (3 0), 137 (3 5), 109 (4 5), 83 (100), 55 1580) Catalvttc hydrogenation of 8. A soln of 150 mg of 8 m EtOAc (8 ml) was stirred in the presence of 30 mg of prehydrogenated 10% Pd on activated charcoal catalyst under an H2 atmosphere at room temp and at 30 atm press The reaction m~xt was stored for 48 hr and then centrifuged and filtered over sdlca gel The residue obtained after evapn of solvent was subjected to CC gl'~mg 150 mg of a isomeric mlxt of longlpm-7fl,8~t-dl(2methyl-butyroyloxy)-9~-hydroxy-l-one (10), colourless off,

I R v [ ' ~ c m I 3480, 1730, I H N M R ( 8 0 M H z ) 6060-1 50(signals corresponding to methyls), 3 62 (1H, s, H-9) and 5 43 ppm (2H, m, H-7 and H-8) ~-~CNMR ~5210 1 (s. C-l). 1750and 1753 (s, esters C=O) Catalytu hvdroqenatton o/'9 This was performed as described above, to yield an oil identical (Tt C and NMR) to 10 above Acknowledgement.s This work was supported b~ CONICIT (Grant Sl-1544) We are grateful to Prof F Bohlmann for 400 MHz 1H NMR spectra, Prof Ernesto Suarez and Sr Juan A Gll (IPNO, Tenerlfe, Spain) for recording the MS and R~do Santiago Lopez for identification of plant material Partml financial support from Proyecto', gCtrat~glcos-SEP (Mexico) is also acknowledged REFERENCES 1 Amaro, J M andHung, M (1985)Ret ba¢ Farm /.,LA, 25 125 2 Amaro, J M and Hung, M (19871 Acta Ctent Venez (m press) 3 Bohlmann, F and Zdero, C {1985) Ltebtgs Ann Chem 1764 4 Bohlmann, F , Suwlta, A, Natu, A A, Czerson, H and Suwlta, A (1977) Chem Ber 110, 3572 5 Bohlmann, 1~ and Zdero, C 11975) Chem Ber 108, 3543 6 RomAn, L U , d e l RJo, R E, Hernandez, J D,Cerda, C M, Cervantes, D , Castafieda R and Joseph-Nathan, P (1985) J Orq Chem 50, 3965 7 Romfi.n, L U . del Rio, R E. Hernfindez, J D , JosephNathan, P , Zabel, V and Watson, V H (1981) Telrahedron 37, 2769 8 GII, R R, Obertl, J C , SOSd, V E and Herz. W (1987) Phytochemlstry 26, 1459 9 Bohlmann, F , Zdero. C and Schoneweiss, S (1976) Chem Ber 109, 3366 10 Bohlmann. F , Ates (Goren), N . Jakupovlc, J, King, R M and Robinson, H (1982) Phvtochemtstry 21, 2691 11 Joseph-Nathan, P , Cerda, C M , del Rio, R E, Roman, L U and Hernandez, J D (1986)J Nut Prod 49, 1053 12 Calo, V Lopez, L, Pesce G and rodeco. P A (1973) Tetrahedron 29, 1625 13 Oedlger, H and Moiler, Fr (1967) .4nqe~ Chem lnternat Edit 6, 76 14 Joseph-Nathan, P , Wesener, J R and Gunther, H (1984) Orq Maqn Rewm 22, 190