N U C L E A R INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS 42 (t966) 26-28; © NORTH=HOLLAND P U B L I S H I N G CO.
L O S S O F C H A R G E D P A R T I C L E S BY N U C L E A R I N T E R A C T I O N S I N S C I N T I L L A T O R S D. F. MEASDAY* Cyclotron Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
and R. J. SCHNEIDER Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
Received 22 November 1965 Some particles, when detected by total energy counters, undergo inelastic collisions. These particles are lost from the full energy
peak. This loss has been calculated for deuterons and alpha particles of up to 160 MeV, for NaI and plastic scintillators.
For scattering experiments involving charged particles it is convenient to use the pulse height in sodium iodide or plastic scintillators to specify the scattered particles. Since the pulse height will be smaller for a particle which has undergone a nuclear interaction in the scintillator, it is necessary to make a correction for particles lost from the peak of the pulse height spectrum. This correction has been calculated previously for protons below 160 MeV in sodium iodide and plastic1). We have repeated it for protons in sodium iodide, making use of more recent range-energy data. We have also extended the calculation to deuterons and alpha-particles below 160 MeV, in sodium iodide and plastic. The calculation is based on range-energy relations and inelastic scattering cross sections. The number of nuclear interactions was f o u n d by dividing the path of the decelerating particle into 20 MeV segments. The number of atoms per square centimeter needed to slow a particle from 120 to 100 MeV, for example, was computed and f r o m this n u m b e r one could obtain the n u m b e r o f interactions undergone by an initial 100 particles entering the scintillator. Allowance was made for the reduction in number of particles which had not yet reacted. It was assumed that no reactions took place below 10 MeV. Range-energy tables were c o m p u t e d for sodium iodide (Nal) f r o m the tables of Williamson and Boujot2), extrapolating between 150 and 160MeV. The range-energy tables for plastic (CH) were computed f r o m Rich and Madey 3) in the deuteron case, and Williamson and Boujot in the case of alpha-particles. The p r o t o n inelastic cross sections for sodium and iodine were taken f r o m ref. 1). Deuteron inelastic cross sections for sodium, iodine and carbon were interpolated f r o m published data at 22.4 MeV4), 26.5 MeV 5) and 160 MeV6). For hydrogen, the inelastic cross sec* Present address: CERN, Geneva 23, Switzerland.
tions were obtained from experiments where deuterium was the target and protons the projectiles. For equivalent centre of mass energy, one must use the relation adp(2E ) = apd(E ). The inelastic cross section is known at a proton energy of 77 MeV7). Other values were obtained by subtracting elastic cross sections 8 - 1o) from the total cross sectionll.12). We assumed that the neutron-deuteron and proton-deuteron interactions TABLE 1
Proton inelastic cross sections (rob). MeV
30-40 MeV
40-50 MeV
> 50 MeV
450 1700
520 1800
400 1550
350 1240
10-30
Sodium Iodine
TABLE 2
Deuteron inelastic cross sections (rob).
Hydrogen Carbon Sodium Iodine
10-20 MeV
20-40 MeV
40-60 MeV
60-80 MeV
> 80 MeV
200 920 [ 1180 1620
206 850 1100 1860
187 667 1000 2100
148 667 900 2300
108 667 930 2590
TABLE3 Alpha-particle inelastic cross sections (mb). 10-20 MeV Hydrogen Carbon Sodium Iodine 26
0 1000 1080 760
20-40 MeV
40-60 MeV
60-80 MeV
> 80 MeV
0 900 1050 I 1030 1300.__ ~ 1830
0 770 1000 2400
40 640 980 2900
950
LOSS
27
OF C H A R G E D P A R T I C L E S BY N U C L E A R I N T E R A C T I O N S IN S C I N T I L L A T O R S TABLE 4 Calculated loss corrections (tail as a percentage of the peak).
Particle energy (MeV)
Protons in NaI
Deuterons in NaI
Alphas in NaI
Deuterons in CH
Alphas in CH
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0.52 2.36 4.38 6.60 10.2 13.8 18.2 23.0
0.34 1.73 3.99 6.97 10.9 16.1 22.2 29.1
0.04 0.21 0.51 0.96 1.61 2.29 3.11 4.10
0.88 3.89 7.74 12.8 19.1 26.9 36.5 48.2
0.11 0.51 1.05 1.69 2.35 3.15 4.13 5.22
were identical, apart from Coulomb effects. Alphaparticle inelastic cross sections for sodium, iodine and carbon were interpolated from published data at 40 MeV 13) and 240 MeV6). For hydrogen the inelastic cross sections were found from experiments on the proton bombardment of helium using the relation ff,,p(4E) = ap~,(E). We used the data summarized by Horikawa and Kanada 14). Tables 1-3 show the inelastic cross sections used. We estimate that these are correct to 15%. Table 4 gives the calculated loss corrections. The 100
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
t
]
values for protons in sodium iodide represent an improved fit to the experimental data of ref. t). The values for deuterons in both sodium iodide and plastic are in reasonable agreement with published experimental data at 26.8 MeVtS). One does not expect exact agreement at low energies because of the assumptions made in the calculation. For example, some of the reactions included in the total cross section may increase the energy deposited in the scintillator. At higher deuteron energies however, the stripping reaction predominates and half of the particle energy is lost. 10
t
i
PLASTIC ( C H ) - No I
S O x v
i
i
i
i ~ ii
I
i
PLASTIC (CH) - -
/
No I
tO
O O x
1.0
O tJ
O H-
t-
.J F-
0 1.O t-¢Y
/
b
/
0.~
/
O t-
/
/
I:E
/
/
/
O.tO
I
I
I
I
I
~o DEUTERON
I
I1[
I
too ENERGY
I
I
I
I
I
IOO, MeV)
Fig. 1. Deuteron loss correction in sodium iodide and plastic (CH) scintillators.
0,ito
I
I
I
I
I II1[
f
I
I
I
I II
100 ALPHA
PARTICLE
10oo ENERGY ( M e V )
Fig. 2. Alpha-particle loss correction in sodium iodide and plastic (CH) scintillators.
28
D. F. MEASDAY AND R. Jo S C H N E I D E R
We do not expect the results for alpha-particles to represent more than a guideline. Sodium iodide, and to a greater extent plastic, has a non-linear response to heavily ionizing particles. When a reaction takes place in the scintillator and a less heavily ionizing particle is emitted, then it is possible that just as much light will be produced as when the alpha-particle stops without an interaction. We therefore emphasize that the alpha-particle results must be considered as upper limits. The results for deuterons and alpha-particles are given graphically in figs. 1 and 2. They are plotted on a log-log scale.
We wish to acknowledge the support of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the U.S. Office of N a v a l Research.
References 1) 2) 3) 4) 5)
D. F. Measday, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 34 (1965) 353. C. Williamson and J. P. Boujot, CEA 2189 (Saclay). M. Rich and R. Madey, U C R L 2301. B. Wilkins and G. Igo, Phys. Lett. 3 (1962) 48. S. Mayo, W. Schimmerling, M. J. Sametband and R. M. Eisberg, Nucl. Phys. 62 (1965) 393. 6) G. P. Millburn, W. Birnbaum, W. E. Crandall and L. Schecter, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 1268. 7) M. Davison, H, W. K. Hopkins, L. Lyons and D. Shaw, Nucl. Phys. 45 (1963) 423. 8) J. H. Williams and M. K. Brussel, Phys. Rev. 110 (1958) 136. 9) D. O. Caldwell and J. R. Richardson, Phys. Rev. 98 (1955) 28. 10) J. D. Seagrave, Phys. Rev. 97 (1955) 757. 11) R. A. J. Riddle, A. Langsford, P. H. Bowen and G. C. Cox, Nucl. Phys. 61 (1965) 457. 12) J. D. Seagrave and R. L. Henkel, Phys. Rev. 98 (1955) 666. 13) G. Igo and B. D. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. 131 (1963) 1251. 14) N. Horikawa and H. Kanada, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 20 (1965) 1758. 15) R. M. Eisberg, S. Mayo and W. Schimmerling, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 21 (1963) 232.