Lower perinatal mortality in preterm born twins than in singletons: a nationwide study from The Netherlands

Lower perinatal mortality in preterm born twins than in singletons: a nationwide study from The Netherlands

Accepted Manuscript Lower perinatal mortality in preterm born twins than in singletons; a nationwide study from the Netherlands Blanka Vasak, MD, Jess...

3MB Sizes 1 Downloads 49 Views

Accepted Manuscript Lower perinatal mortality in preterm born twins than in singletons; a nationwide study from the Netherlands Blanka Vasak, MD, Jessica J. Verhagen, MD, Steven V. Koenen, PhD, MD, Maria P.H. Koster, PhD, MD, P.A.O.M. de Reu, PhD, Arie Franx, PhD, MD, Jan G. Nijhuis, PhD, MD, Gouke J. Bonsel, PhD, MD, Gerard H.A. Visser, PhD, MD PII:

S0002-9378(16)30868-7

DOI:

10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.005

Reference:

YMOB 11335

To appear in:

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Received Date: 13 July 2016 Revised Date:

16 September 2016

Accepted Date: 3 October 2016

Please cite this article as: Vasak B, Verhagen JJ, Koenen SV, Koster MPH, de Reu PAOM, Franx A, Nijhuis JG, Bonsel GJ, Visser GHA, Lower perinatal mortality in preterm born twins than in singletons; a nationwide study from the Netherlands, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.005. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 1

TITLE PAGE

2

Lower perinatal mortality in preterm born twins than in singletons; a nationwide study from the Netherlands

3

RI PT

4

Blanka Vasak1 (MD), Jessica J. Verhagen1 (MD), Steven V. Koenen1 (PhD, MD), Maria P.H. Koster1

6

(PhD, MD), P.A.O.M. de Reu2 (PhD), Arie Franx 1 (PhD, MD), Jan G. Nijhuis3 (PhD, MD), Gouke J.

7

Bonsel1 (PhD, MD), Gerard H.A. Visser1 (PhD, MD)

SC

5

8 1

Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands

10

2

Independent midwife, retired, no current affiliation

11 12

3

M AN U

9

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

13

TE D

Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment of financial support: Vrienden UMC Utrecht provided financial support.

EP

Paper presentation This study has been presented at the 49th Annual Gynaecongres, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, May 20, 2016.

AC C

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Table or Figure that needs to be included in the Print Version Figure 1

Corresponding author: B. Vasak, MD.

Work address: University Medical Center Departement Obstetrics, Huispostnummer KE 04.123.1 PO Box 85090

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45

Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA Utrecht The Netherlands

46

Word count main text: 2673

47

Word count abstract: 278

48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55

Condensation of the paper Overall perinatal mortality is higher in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies, but during the preterm period, mortality is considerably lower in twins.

RI PT SC

+31 88 75 539 23 +31 6 41 38 52 31 +31 88 75 553 20

M AN U

Telephone: Work: Private: Fax:

EP

TE D

Short version article title "Lower perinatal mortality in preterm born twins than in singletons."

AC C

56

Email: [email protected]

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3

Abstract

58

Background: Twin pregnancies are at increased risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality, due to many factors including a high incidence of preterm delivery. Compared to singleton pregnancies overall perinatal mortality risk is higher in twin pregnancies, however for the preterm period perinatal mortality has been reported to be lower in twins.

63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79

Objective: To compare perinatal mortality in relation to gestational age at birth between singleton and twin pregnancies, taken into account socioeconomic status, fetal sex and parity. Study design: We studied perinatal mortality according to gestational age at birth in 1.502.120 singletons and 51.658 twins without congenital malformations who were delivered between 2002 and 2010 after 28 weeks of gestation. Data were collected from the nationwide Netherlands Perinatal Registry.

SC

62

Results: Overall perinatal mortality in twins (6.6/1000 infants) was higher than in singletons (4.1/1000 infants). However, in the preterm period perinatal mortality in twins was substantially lower than in singleton pregnancies, 10.4 per 1000 infants as compared to 34.5 per 1000 infants, respectively for infants born < 37 weeks; this held especially for antepartum deaths. After 39 weeks of pregnancy perinatal mortality was higher in twins. Differences in parity, fetal sex and socioeconomic status did not explain the observed differences in outcome.

M AN U

61

Conclusion: Overall perinatal mortality was higher in twins than in singletons, which is most likely caused by the high preterm birth rate in twins and not by a higher mortality rate for gestation, apart from term pregnancies. During the preterm period, antepartum mortality was much lower in twins than in singletons. We suggest that this might partially be due to a closer monitoring of twins, which indirectly suggests a need for closer surveillance of singleton pregnancies.

TE D

60

EP

59

RI PT

57

80

Key words

82

Gestational age, Perinatal mortality, Preterm mortality, Singleton pregnancies, Twin pregnancies

83 84 85 86 87

AC C

81

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4

Introduction

89

Twin pregnancies are at increased risk for preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction

90

and a number of multiplet related conditions. Monochorionic twins have additional risks

91

for mortality and morbidity primarily due to the twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome

92

(TTTS) and congenital abnormalities.1-5

93

While registry data in Western countries (PERISTAT) confirm a crude 2-3 fold increased

94

perinatal mortality risk of a twin pregnancy,6 only few reports have compared mortality

95

and morbidity between twin and singleton pregnancies taking into account differences

96

in gestational age at delivery. They all found a lower perinatal mortality in twins born

97

before 37 weeks.7-9 These studies were all small, with the exception of one (Kahn) and

98

did not include separation between zygosity and chorionicity in twins, nor did they take

99

into account known prognostic important factors such as parity and socioeconomic

M AN U

SC

RI PT

88

status (SES) of the mother and sex of the child.

101

The objective of this study was to compare perinatal mortality in relation to gestational

102

age at birth between singleton and twin pregnancies, taken into account parity, SES,

103

fetal sex and mode of delivery. For this study we used a large national anonymized data

104

set from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry (Perined).10

EP

TE D

100

AC C

105 106

Materials and methods

107

General

108

This was a retrospective population-based cohort study. We obtained, after prior

109

permission from the Perinatal Registry (Perined),11 aggregated data and analyses on all

110

births in the Netherlands between 2002 and 2010. This registry contains information on

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5 111

approximately 95% of all births from 16.0 weeks gestational age onwards, where

112

coverage of twins is even higher. Details of this dataset can be found elsewhere.10

113

Variables

115

The Perined dataset includes routine maternal data on age, parity, socioeconomic

116

background (zip-code based), and ethnic background. Information is available on

117

intervention (induction of labor, mode of delivery (instrumental, elective and emergency

118

cesarean delivery), NICU admission of the child and specific features of the delivery.

119

Data on the child comprise of: singleton or multiplet, sex of the child, presence of

120

congenital anomalies, gestational age at birth, birth weight, and Apgar score at 5

121

minutes. From birth weight, sex and gestational age, the birth weight is computed as

122

centile score.12

123

The size of the multiplet is recorded and for each child its rank number during birth. No

124

information is available on zygosity/chorionicity. Congenital abnormalities were

125

recorded if they were present and recognized, either at birth or at first NICU admission

126

by the neonatologist. This includes any abnormality already noticed during antenatal

127

ultrasound scanning or, occasionally, with genetic tests. All children with congenital

128

abnormalities were excluded. Gestational age was calculated from the first day of the

129

last menstrual period or from an ultrasound dating scan by measurement of the Crown-

130

Rump Length in the first trimester. In this period 91% of the pregnancies had a reliable

131

dating, obtained by a first trimester dating scan.10 For twins conceived spontaneously

132

dating was based on the mean CRL of both fetuses. Pregnancies achieved by assisted

133

reproductive technology (ART) were dated based on the ART-derived gestational age.

134

In this report a gestational age of 37 weeks means: 37 weeks + 0 days - 37 weeks + 6

135

days containing whole week groups. For this analysis births between 28+0 and 43+6

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

114

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6

gestation were included, to allow comparison with data from other countries in which

137

registration practices may differ at earlier gestational ages.6 Children with missing

138

gestational age at birth were excluded from the analysis. A total of 1839 children from a

139

twin pregnancy were excluded because a twin pair could not be linked or information

140

on congenital malformations or gestational age of one of the twins was missing. In this

141

group there were 42 perinatal deaths. If one of the twins died before 28 weeks gestation

142

both children were excluded from analysis. If one of the twins died after 28 weeks

143

gestation and the pregnancy continued for the benefit of the other twin, the gestational

144

age at birth was registered for both twins, the exact gestational age of death for the

145

demised twin was not available in this database.

146

Perinatal mortality was defined as fetal or neonatal death up to 7 days after birth:

147

antepartum mortality was defined as death occurring before labor, intrapartum mortality

148

as death during labor, and neonatal mortality as death occurring within 0–7 days

149

following live birth. This information is always available in all cases.

150

Statistical analysis

151

Perinatal mortality was expressed as rate (number of deaths per 1000 infants, including

152

stillbirths). Mortality rate was subdivided to time of occurrence: antepartum, intrapartum

153

and neonatal. Perinatal mortality was compared between singleton and twin, according

154

to gestational age. The mortality rates at 42 and 43 weeks gestation were not displayed

155

owing to the extremely small number of cases. Comparisons were made between

156

groups by using multivariate logistic regression with gestational age in the model or chi

157

square test.

158

The mode of delivery in singletons and twins was studied. Vaginal delivery was divided

159

in spontaneous vaginal delivery and instrumental delivery defined as delivery by forceps

160

or a vacuum device. Cesarean delivery was divided in planned cesarean section, defined

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

136

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 7

as a scheduled or elective cesarean, and an emergency cesarean defined as any

162

cesarean that was not planned or scheduled.

163

To investigate the influence of parity, maternal SES, and child sex, we calculated

164

perinatal mortality rates for each parameter for twins and singletons: for parity (0 vs.

165

1+), SES (p<20 poor vs. p>20) and child sex (male/female). For classification of SES, the

166

"socio-economic status score" was used as a proxy. This score takes into account the

167

average income per household in a given four-digit postcode area and the percentage

168

of households with low income, without paid job and with low education level.13,14 The

169

level of SES was categorized as low if the score was under the 20th centile.

170

No information on zygosity was available in the data set. The only information we could

171

obtain on zygosity indirectly were the twin pairs with unequal gender; male-female

172

twins, these twins are per definition dizygotic and dichorial.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

161

TE D

173

Results

175

We studied 1.502.120 singletons and 51.658 twins born between 2002 and 2010 after 28

176

weeks of gestation. In singleton pregnancies there were 6.087 perinatal deaths

177

(4.1/1000). For twins a total of 340 deaths occurred resulting in a perinatal mortality

178

rate of 6.6 per 1000 infants. Perinatal mortality according to gestational age is displayed

179

in table 1.

180

Of all twins 46% were born before 37 weeks of gestation, in contrast to only 5% in the

181

singletons. For deliveries before 37 weeks perinatal mortality rate in twins was 10.4 per

182

1000 infants compared to 34.5 per 1000 infants in singletons. For infants born before 34

183

weeks mortality rates were 17.2 per 1000 infants in twins and 93.6 per 1000 infants in

184

singletons.

AC C

EP

174

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 8

In singleton pregnancies, perinatal mortality decreased with increasing gestational age,

186

with the lowest mortality rate at 40 weeks gestational age. In twin pregnancies mortality

187

also decreased with increasing gestational age with the lowest mortality rate at 38

188

weeks and an increase thereafter (Fig 1). In the preterm period, perinatal mortality in

189

twins was substantially lower than in singleton pregnancies. After 39+0 weeks mortality

190

was higher in twins.

191

In figure 2 perinatal mortality is displayed according to time period of occurrence of

192

death. In both singletons and twins the majority of perinatal deaths occurred in the

193

antepartum period, followed by the neonatal period and the intrapartum period,

194

respectively. In singletons, the distribution of the time period of death was, 72 %

195

antepartum, 9% intra partum and 19% neonatal; for twins this distribution was 59%

196

antepartum, 6% intra partum and 35% neonatal. Antepartum mortality was significantly

197

lower in twins as compared to singletons during the whole preterm period (p<0.001).

198

After 40 weeks gestation antepartum mortality was significantly higher for twins (p 0.02).

199

Intrapartum mortality was significantly lower between 31-33 weeks of gestation but did

200

not differ in the term period. Neonatal mortality was more or less similar during the

201

whole preterm period, mortality rates were higher for twins in the term period. Twins

202

were more often delivered by cesarean section than singletons (Table 2).

203

In both singletons and twins, nulliparity was related to higher overall mortality rates.

204

Poor maternal socioeconomic status (SES
205

overall perinatal mortality rates in singletons, in twins rates were also higher in these

206

groups but this was not significant (Table 3). Figure 3 shows twin and singleton mortality

207

rates per parameter for gestational age. Within the singletons and twin groups mortality

208

rates did not differ for parity, fetal sex and socioeconomic status.

209

Overall perinatal mortality was slightly lower in dizygotic twins of unequal gender as

210

compared to all twins and this held for most gestational ages (Table 1 & Fig 4). For

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

185

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9 211

infants born preterm mortality rates were lower in dizygotic unequal gender twins than

212

in singletons.

RI PT

213

Comment

215

This study shows that, in a large contemporary population of infants without congenital

216

abnormalities born after 28 weeks' gestation, overall perinatal mortality was higher in

217

twins compared to singletons, which is in accordance with literature.5

218

perinatal mortality in preterm twins was considerably lower than in singletons. For

219

antepartum mortality this held for the whole preterm period and for intrapartum

220

mortality between 31 and 33 weeks, but not for neonatal mortality. Data did not change

221

when parity, sex, socio-economic status were taken into account.

222

An explanation for the lower preterm perinatal death rates in twins as compared to

223

singletons might be a difference in the etiology of preterm delivery. In the latter

224

population many of the preterm deliveries are associated with pathologies such as

225

preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction whereas in twins preterm contractions due to

226

uterine overdistention is the most likely causative mechanism in the majority of

227

cases.15,16 However, it is unlikely that this may explain the lower antepartum mortality

228

rate especially since we included both mono- and dizygotic twins in our study. An

229

explanation for the lower antenatal mortality rate may be that in twin gestations with

230

one fetal death, pregnancy might have been continued for the benefit of the other twin,

231

resulting in a later (term) delivery and inaccuracy in determination of the timing of the

232

fetal death. This is unlikely to occur in a singleton pregnancy. This may have lowered the

233

preterm antenatal mortality rate and increased the term mortality rate in twins.

234

However, in this study 73 % of deaths in twins were recorded as having occurred during

235

the preterm period (Table 1), i.e. this will not account for the differences found. Another

However,

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

214

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10 236

important reason might be that twin pregnancies are considered to be at high risk and

237

are therefore more closely monitored than singleton pregnancies in the same period.

238

According

239

measurements of fetal biometry, screening for signs of TTTS in monochorionic twins and

240

care given by an obstetrician17 Such a monitoring does not occur in case of singleton

241

pregnancies, which may be cared for by midwives, general practitioners or obstetricians.

242

Uncomplicated dichorial twins are advised to be induced into labor before 40 weeks

243

gestational age. For uncomplicated monochorial diamniotic and monoamniotic twins

244

induction of labor is advised at 36-37 and 32-34 weeks gestation respectively. For

245

uncomplicated singletons pregnancies, induction of labor is advised at 42+0 weeks of

246

pregnancy, induction may be considered between 41-42 weeks if the parents prefer

247

this.17

248

Our observations regarding mortality in relation to gestational age at birth are

249

supported by some previous studies. Kahn et al. evaluated the prospective risk of fetal

250

mortality in singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies and found lower antepartum

251

mortality rates in twins compared to singletons until week 37 of gestation.7 In another

252

study from Korea, 609.643 singletons and 9805 twins were studied, the neonatal

253

mortality rate was lower in twins than in singletons with a gestational age > 29 weeks.8

254

A third study on fetal and neonatal mortality rates for singleton and multiple births in

255

the United States over the years 1985-1988 and 1995-1998 showed that for deliveries

256

before 37 weeks’ gestation fetal mortality rates were lower in twins than in singletons.9

257

Finally a large study from Canada,18

258

malformed twins was less than 1 per 1000 for infants born preterm, which is

259

considerably lower than antenatal stillbirth rates reported by us and others in

260

singletons.19,20

the

national

guidelines

this

includes

longitudinal

ultrasound

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

to

has shown that the risk of stillbirth in non-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11

The lower antenatal mortality rate in twins as compared to singletons may well imply

262

that monitoring of singletons should be intensified to lower the stillbirth rate during the

263

preterm period. However, it remains uncertain which assessment tools should be used

264

(e.g., Doppler uterine artery, umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery; longitudinal growth

265

assessment, markers of placentation, maternal risk factors). Moreover, identification of

266

singletons at risk of stillbirth may prove difficult, given the fact that the majority will

267

have a fetal weight within the normal range. 20

268

In dizygotic twins of unequal gender there was no clear increase in mortality until 40

269

weeks of gestation, which suggests that in dizygotic twins modern surveillance

270

expectant management may last until that age, although nowadays most authors

271

suggest induction around 38 weeks.

272

delivery at 37 weeks’ gestation compared to ongoing expectant management for

273

women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy does not appear to be associated with

274

an increased risk of morbidity or mortality, however specific data on chorionicity could

275

not be provided.21

276

A strength of this study is its large population based sample size. However, some

277

limitations of this study need to be mentioned. Twin pregnancies with missing data of

278

one or both children were excluded, as were singletons with missing data. In case all 42

279

deaths that were excluded in the twin group had occurred in the preterm period,

280

mortality in twins would have been about 17% higher, which would still be considerably

281

lower than that in singletons during the preterm period. The overall perinatal mortality

282

rate in twins born before 37weeks of gestation was 10.4/1000 and in singletons

283

34.5/1000 (Table 1); addition of 42 deaths to the twin cohort born <37 weeks, would

284

increase perinatal mortality till 12.1/1000.

285

information on the causes of death and possible inaccuracies in the registration of the

286

time of occurrence of death, especially for distinction between antepartum and

M AN U

SC

RI PT

261

Data from the Cochrane library indicate that

AC C

EP

TE D

18,21-23

Other limitations include the lack of

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12

intrapartum death.24 Another limitation is the lack of data on zygosity and placental

288

chorionicity. Perinatal mortality is higher in monozygotic/monochorial twins.2 To

289

estimate perinatal mortality rates in monozygotic twins the Weinberg formula may be

290

used.25 With this formula it is assumed that a) the number of dizygotic twins with

291

unequal gender is the same as that of dizygotic twins of equal gender, b) within

292

dizygotic twins the mortality of one member of the twin is independent from the gender

293

of the other member of the twin and c) within dizygotic twins a perfect balance exists

294

between the number of male-male and female-female twins. With this formula mortality

295

in monozygotic twins may be calculated as follows using absolute numbers: A. total twin

296

mortality – B. dizygotic twin mortality (mortality in dizygotic twins of different gender x

297

2) = C. mortality in monozygotic twins.

298

perinatal mortality was higher in monozygotic twins than in dizygotic DZ twins and this

299

held for most gestational ages (supplementary figure 1). However, preterm mortality

300

rates were lower in monozygotic twins than in singletons. This method has frequently

301

been used in previous literature on twin pregnancies. The reliability of this rule’s

302

assumptions has never been conclusively verified, nor rejected,26 We have chosen not to

303

include these data in the results section.

304

Conclusion

305

Overall perinatal mortality was higher in twins than in singletons. This is most likely

306

caused by the high preterm birth rate in twins and not by a higher mortality rate for

307

gestation, apart from term pregnancies. During the preterm period perinatal mortality

308

and especially stillbirth was much lower in twin deliveries than in singleton deliveries.

309

We hypothesize that this might, among others, be due to the closer monitoring of twins,

310

which indirectly suggests a need for closer monitoring of singleton pregnancies. Future

311

research should concentrate on data on zygosity and causes of death, to develop

312

optimal risk reduction strategies.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

287

AC C

EP

TE D

By using this formula we found that overall

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13 313

Acknowledgments

315

This project was supported by funding from Vrienden UMC Utrecht.

316

We would like to thank C. Hukkelhoven (Perined) for providing the aggregated data and

317

analyses.

RI PT

314

SC

318

References

320

1. Ortibus E, Lopriore E, Deprest J, et al. The pregnancy and long-term neurodevelopmental

321

outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations: A multicenter prospective cohort study

322

from the first trimester onward. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):494.e1-494.e8. doi:

323

10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.048 [doi].

324

2. Hack KE, Derks JB, Elias SG, et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in

325

monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: Clinical implications of a large dutch cohort

326

study. BJOG. 2008;115(1):58-67. doi: BJO1556 [pii].

327

3. Lopriore E, Nagel HT, Vandenbussche FP, Walther FJ. Long-term neurodevelopmental

328

outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(5):1314-1319.

329

doi: S0002937803007609 [pii].

330

4. Sherer DM. Adverse perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: Review

331

of the literature. Am J Perinatol. 2001;18(1):23-37.

332

5. Powers WF, Kiely JL. The risks confronting twins: A national perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol.

333

1994;170(2):456-461. doi: S000293789400476X [pii].

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

319

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 14

6. EURO-PERISTAT Project with SCPE and EUROCAT. European perinatal health report. the

335

health and care of pregnant women and babies in europe in 2010.May 2013.

336

7. Kahn B, Lumey LH, Zybert PA, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and

337

triplet gestations: Implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(4):685-692. doi:

338

S0029784403006161 [pii].

339

8. Hong JS, Yi SW, Han YJ, et al. Fetal growth and neonatal mortality in korea. Paediatr Perinat

340

Epidemiol. 2007;21(5):397-410. doi: PPE850 [pii].

341

9. Alexander GR, Slay Wingate M, Salihu H, Kirby RS. Fetal and neonatal mortality risks of

342

multiple births. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005;32(1):1-16, vii. doi: S0889-8545(04)00124-X

343

[pii].

344

10. Utrecht, perined 2016. www.perined.nl.

345

11. Perined. Perinatale zorg in Nederland 2014. Utrecht 2015.

346

12. Visser GH, Eilers PH, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Merkus HM, Wit JM. New dutch reference curves

347

for birthweight by gestational age. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(12):737-744. doi:

348

10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.09.008; 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.09.008.

349

13. Posthumus AG, Borsboom GJ, Poeran J, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ. Geographical, ethnic and

350

socio-economic differences in utilization of obstetric care in the netherlands. PLoS One.

351

2016;11(6):e0156621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156621 [doi].

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

334

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15

14. Knol F. Status development in neighbourhoods in the netherlands 1998–2010 (in

353

dutch: statusontwikkeling van wijken in nederland 1998–2010). the netherlands institute for

354

social research, 2012 . .

355

15. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth.

356

Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 [doi].

357

16. Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG.

358

2006;113 Suppl 3:17-42. doi: BJO1120 [pii].

359

17. Nederlandse Vereniging voor obstetrie en gynaecologie. Richtlijn meerlingzwangerschap.

360

http://nvog documenten.nl/index.php?pagina=/richtlijn/pagina.php&fSelectTG_62=75&fSelect

361

edSub=62&fSelectedParent=75. Accessed July,2016.

362

18. Wood S, Tang S, Ross S, Sauve R. Stillbirth in twins, exploring the optimal gestational age for

363

delivery: A retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121(10):1284-90; discussion 1291. doi:

364

10.1111/1471-0528.12866 [doi].

365

19. Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors

366

for stillbirth: Population based study. BMJ. 2013;346:f108. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f108.

367

20. Vasak B, Koenen SV, Koster MP, et al. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for

368

perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(2):162-167. doi: 10.1002/uog.14644

369

[doi].

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

352

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 16

21. Dodd JM, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, Crowther CA. Elective birth at 37 weeks' gestation for

371

women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

372

2014;2:CD003582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003582.pub2 [doi].

373

22. Doss AE, Mancuso MS, Cliver SP, Jauk VC, Jenkins SM. Gestational age at delivery and

374

perinatal outcomes of twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(5):410.e1-410.e6. doi:

375

10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.012 [doi].

376

23. Kilpatrick SJ, Jackson R, Croughan-Minihane MS. Perinatal mortality in twins and singletons

377

matched for gestational age at delivery at > or = 30 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 Pt

378

1):66-71. doi: S0002-9378(96)70375-7 [pii].

379

24. Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in

380

low and high risk term pregnancies in the netherlands: Prospective cohort study. BMJ.

381

2010;341:c5639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5639.

382

25. Weinberg W. Beitrage zur physiologie und pathologie der mehrlingsbeburten beim

383

menschen. Arch Ges Physiol. 1902;88:346–430.

384

26. Fellman J, Eriksson AW. Weinberg's differential rule reconsidered. Hum Biol.

385

2006;78(3):253-275. doi: 10.1353/hub.2006.0044 [doi].

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

386

RI PT

370

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

17

Tables

388

Table 1: Perinatal mortality according to gestational age in singleton and twin pregnancies

389

15 23 22 16 21 22 41 42 47 42 25 15 8 1 0 0 340

406 592 730 1048 1666 2496 3900 5088 8088 13588 9374 3502 1039 129 10 2 51658

Dizygotic twins unequal gender

PMR within week

36.95 38.85 30.14 15.27 12.61 8.81 10.51 8.25 5.81 3.09 2.67 4.28 7.70 7.75 0.00 0.00 6.58

M AN U

225.92 179.28 121.66 94.86 69.01 45.61 28.79 20.21 10.91 6.20 3.01 2.02 1.66 2.07 1.98 1.12 4.05

TE D

1443 1718 2285 2899 4130 6337 10732 17319 33999 85521 215586 357042 420017 274563 67638 891 1502120

EP

326 308 278 275 285 289 309 350 371 530 648 720 696 567 134 1 6087

Total deaths Total infants (n) (n)

AC C

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Total

All twins

Total deaths Total infants PMR within (n) (n) week

Total deaths Total infants (n) (n)

SC

Singletons Gestational age (weeks)

RI PT

387

1 5 3 4 11 4 9 14 15 19 8 4 1 0 0 0 98

96 174 208 362 510 773 1270 1783 2684 5102 3621 1377 415 59 4 0 18438

PMR within week

10.42 28.74 14.42 11.05 21.57 5.17 7.09 7.85 5.59 3.72 2.21 2.90 2.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.32

n= number, PMR= perinatal mortality rate *Per 1000 infants

Multivariate logistic regression analysis: Singletons versus all twins p <0.001. Singletons versus dizygotic twins unequal gender p <0.001. All twins versus dizygotic twins unequal gender p 0.18.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 18 390

Table 2: Mode of delivery in singleton and twin pregnancies Singletons n

%

n

1.129.542

75.20

26.628

51.55

<0.001

Instrumental delivery

153.354

10.21

5.006

9.69

0.23

Planned cesarean delivery

95.792

6.38

10.720

20.75

<0.001

Emergency cesarean delivery

120.141

8.00

9.171

17.75

<0.001

3.291

0.22

0.26

0.92

Spontaneous

Unknown 392

n=number, %=percentage

394

396

Parity

Socioeconomic status

400 401 402 403 404 405

PMR

4.53

3.65

SES > p20

p value

PMR

PMR

<0.001

4.80

3.76

EP

Twins 7.56 5.72 0.01 6.55 6.52 PMR: perinatal mortality rate per 1000 infants, SES: socioeconomic status

AC C

399

PMR

SES < p20

TE D

Singletons

398

133

Table 3: Perinatal mortality in singleton and twin pregnancies according to parity, sex, and socioeconomic status.

Nulliparous Multiparous

397

%

M AN U

393

395

p

SC

Delivery mode

All twins

RI PT

391

Child sex Boys

Girls

p value

PMR

PMR

p value

<0.001

4.16

3.92

<0.001

0.97

7.15

6.02

0.11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 19

Figures

407

Figure 1.

408

Figure legend: Perinatal mortality in singleton and twin pregnancies according to gestational age at birth. Perinatal mortality rates per 1000 infants with 95% confidence intervals.

409

RI PT

406

410 411

Figure 2.

413

Figure legend: Perinatal mortality in singleton and twin pregnancies according to time of occurrence of death and gestational age at birth. Perinatal mortality rates per 1000 infants with 95% confidence intervals.

415

M AN U

414

SC

412

416 417

Figure 3.

419

Figure legend: Perinatal mortality in singleton and twin pregnancies according to parity, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES) at birth. Perinatal mortality rates per 1000 infants. P20= 20th centile.

421 422 423

EP

420

TE D

418

Figure 4.

425

Figure legend: Perinatal mortality in singleton and dizygotic twin pregnancies with unequal gender (female-male twins) according to gestational age at birth. Perinatal mortality rate per 1000 infants with 95% confidence intervals. The mortality rates after 41 weeks gestation were not displayed owing to the extremely small number of cases.

426 427 428 429 430 431

432

AC C

424

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 20

Supplementary

434

Supplementary Figure S1.

435

Figure legend: Perinatal mortality in singleton and twin pregnancies according to zygosity and gestational age at birth. Data on twin zygosity were estimated using the Weinberg formula. The mortality rates after 41 weeks gestation were not displayed owing to the extremely small number of cases.

436 437 438

RI PT

433

SC

439

440

M AN U

441

AC C

EP

TE D

442

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT