Tec~onaph~s~cs, 192 (1991) 57-79
57
Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
Magnetic crustal structures in northern Fennoscandia Herbert
Henkel
Geological Suruey of Sweden. Box 670, S-751 28 Uppsalu, Sweden
(Revised version accepted September 15, 1989)
ABSTRACT Henkel, H., 1991. Magnetic crustal structures in northern Fennoscandia. Anomalies-Land and Sea. Tectonophysics, 192: 57-79.
In: P. Wasilewski and P. Hood (Editors). Magnetic
Cooperation between the Nordic countries has produced a set of geophysical and geological maps in the region north of the 66th parallel in northernmost Europe. The area covers the transition from oceanic crust to the Baltic Shield, a section of the Caledonides, and a part of the Arctic platform. An interpretation of the aeromagnetic and gravity maps reveals several large structural units with distinct boundaries and characteristic anomaly patterns. In combination with data on rock physical properties, some general magnetic cmstal features can be outlined: (1) typical occurrence of magnetically banded ocean crust anomalies, (2) the occurrence of magnetically banded patterns in the continental crust connected with metasupracrustal formations separated by culminations of high-density and high-magnetization basement domes and megashear zones (thrusts and transcurrent faults) with large displacements, (3) occurrence of magnetic granitoid batholiths, (4) general low remanence of shield rocks, allowing straightforward interpretation of magnetic total field anomalies, and (5) general low magnetization of Caledonian thrusted units allowing mapping of the depth to their magnetic basement. Merging magnetic, gravity and petrophysical data allows constraints to be applied when modelling crustal structures. Some of the large-scale structural features are illustrated and some examples of profiles through the upper crustal structures are shown.
Introduction
production of the two anomaly maps, aeromagnetic interpretation of detailed maps (at scales from
The large amount of magnetic and gravity data collected in northern Fennoscandia by the na-
1: 50,000 to 1 : 400,~O) was carried OUI., resulting in a 1 : l,OOO,OOO compilation (Fig. 6 I (Henkel.
tional together
geological
and
land
surveys
were brought
into a common database for the NordkaFrom these data, 1 : l,OOO,OOO maps
lott Project.
1986). In this paper,
some of the more
regional
aspects of the magnetic and gravity crustai structures will be discussed, and examples of some
have been produced (Figs. 4 and 5) (Korhonen, 1986; Korhonen and Kiviniemi, 1986). The database consists of a 1 x 1 km grid of magnetic total intensity anomalies and a 2.5 x 2.5 km grid of
particular structures will be considered. The maps produced during the Nordkalott Project are available from the Nordic geological survey>.
terrain-corrected Bouguer anomalies. The aeromagnetic dataset comprises twelve components with different line spacing and flight altitude
Aeromagnetic
specifications. The data covering the Precambrian terrains to the east of the Caledonides was reduced to a common apparent elevation of 200 m above ground. The other areas have been incorporated without any change with respect to the original (more than 200 m) elevations. Parallel with the 0040-1951/91/$03.50
0 1991 - Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
interpretation
map (Fig. 6)
The interpretation method for low-altitude (30 or 40 m) aeromagnetic measurements in Precambrian shield areas as proposed by Henkel (in Witschard, 1975) was tested in regions where higher flight altitude (150 or 160 m) data had already been acquired. A test area in the Precambrian shield region overlapping the three par-
H. HENKEl.
58
ticipating countries was used for further refinement of the interpretation method, and for adaptation to the more regional requirements of the Nordkalott Project. The results from the test area are recorded in Henkel (1984). In the Caledonides and shelf areas, depth to (magnetic) basement computations were performed. The aeromagnetic interpretation used original aeromagnetic maps at scales ranging from 1 : 50.000 to 1 : 400.000 together with existing interpretations acquired in connection with other mapping projects and regional studies. The results were then brought to a common scale of 1 : 500,000, at which information was generalized to fit the final reproduction scale, 1 : l,OOO,OOO. Along the national borders, the structures were fitted together by appropriate revision of the original interpretations. Traditional approaches to aeromagnetic interpretation, such as defining magnetic sources and structures together with the recognition of a few basic patterns, were attempted. The high- to intermediate-resolution measurements used for the interpretation of the Nordkalott data permitted a quite good visual pattern identification and provided for a series of criteria allowing enhanced interpretation.
parallel
dlscordant
DYKES
very
CONCENTRIC
Fig. 1. Illustration
of different
cmtmuous
parallel subctrcular
no pattern
IRREGULAR
discontinuous types of magnetic
In the interpretation procedures, anomalies having similar amplitude, symmetry and position (within a structure) are connected b,y’lines representing the location of the source body at the surface. This location will change w.th respect to the anomaly location due to strike and dip and the direction of magnetization. The rock data are therefore extremely useful. Induced magnetization parallel to the local geomagnetic field is assumed to be the dominant type of magnetization. This assumption is correct for most of the Precambrian rocks of the region, as shown by their low Q-values (ratio of remanent to induced magnetization) in the range 0.1-0.5 (Henkel, this issue). In some mafic intrusions, however, significant remanent
Five types of patterns (Fig. 1) are considered to be of prime interest. These are listed in Table 1.
1
Aeromagnetic
patterns
Pattern
Definition
Banded
Continuous
Dykes
Very continuous
Typical and parallel
anomalies
and/or
discordant
and parallel
anomalies
1itholo;ies
Supracrustal. anomalies
with typical
asymmetry
Dykes and sillzI.
and strike Concentric
Continuous
Irregular
Lack of distinct
No pattern
Lack of anomalies,
patterns,
irregular
magnetically
with subcircular dist~bution transparent
patterns.
Reference structures (connections, con !acts and dislocations)
Patterns
TABLE
continwus
BANDED
arrangement
of anomalies
Mafic intrusions. Igneous
rocks.
Low- to intermediategrade sediments.
MAGNETIC
CRUSTAL
magnetization nence
STRUCTURES
may
be found.
has a direction
field
magnetic
bands
minimum
width
flight altitude,
can
be
will
but
sources
than
the
flight
sources
with
will
to
a
of less
anomaly only (see Fig. 2); a flight altitude m was used in the Finnish and Norwegian
netic are
one of 150 Shield
source
displaced
along
faults
high-resolution mated
horizontal down
m). The
at depth has
is indicated,
vertical
sides
and
where
the change
of
pattern occurs at the position of the contact
assuming
the source
the magnetization
body is in-
duced. Side shifts due to inclined contacts can also be accounted for in the inte~retation as well as southward to location Changes
shifts of the source body of the magnetic anomaly. in the continuity
with respect
aeromagnetic
of the magnetic
ref-
erence patterns are used to map and characterize magnetic dislocations. The location of such dislocations at the surface is indicated with straight-line segments in the interpretation map (Fig. 3). Displacement
of
reference
Fig. 2. Resolution
of magnetic
structures
measurements
along
linear
100
faults
is
in fractured (Henkel
is more typically
measurements.
A very
dislocatiors
is their
orthogonal
is greatly
among
which at
set can be observed.
In
reduced,
the
more
general
lineaments has been used. area, in the southern central
Nordkalott area where the N-S shear zone and the NW-SE
Bothnian-Senja Nordkalott combining
esti-
the shield region, where the magnetic
region of the Bothnian-Seiland study
be
to haemati:e
along only a few trends,
notion of magnetic In the LansjHrv
tailed
In
(about
with
oxidation
of magnetic
areas outside
defining
can
low associated
1977). This feature
feature
resolution
types.
accumulated
displacement
in low-altitude
least one nearly
contacts
the
of magnetite
and Guzman,
location
and structures
of various
to the increased
rocks (oxidation
typical
bodies
linear
in the mag-
to half the line spacing
magnetic
exhibited
associated
arising
measurements,
Areas having different magnetic patterns and/or different magnetizations are separated by magnetic
and
effects
when
area studies.
magnetization and/or surface. The approximate
lows
patterns
attributed
can still be produce
magnetic are typical
apparent
increasing
separations
altitude
resolu-
down
10 m. With
well-separated
as
of 40 m), single
observed
of about
of
gradients
Proj-
In the highest
(at elevations
identified, half
anomalies
can be considered
the same direction.
tion measurements
zones
rema-
In the area of the Nordkalott
ect, the geomagnetic having
this
from the geomag-
asy~et~c
59
FENNOSCANDIA
When
different
netic field, conspicuous be produced.
IN NORTHERN
shear zone intersect, of fault
zones
inte~retations digital elevation data (Henkel,
In some areas, can be identified
a fairly
was carried
de-
out. The
were improved by data with digital 1988).
the effects of low-angle thrusts in the magnetic anomaly pat-
terns. Typical features associated with this phenomenon are (1) discordant structures on either side, lower
(2) strongly unit
where
asymmetric the upper
spaced 20 m apart at 40 and 160 m above differently
anomahes unit
in the
is magnetically
spaced 50 m wide sources.
H. HENKU
REFERENCE
STRUCTURES
MAGNETIC DISLOCATION
_-
magnetic
connectlons
=
disiocatlon
-
magnettc
contacts
*****
linear
low
-
lateral
displacement
vertical O”l
Fig. 3. Magnetic
strong, (3) deep source anomalies
reference
structures
in the lower unit
where the upper unit is magnetically weaker, and (4) a generally more curving course than is typical for magnetic
dislocations.
Due to the low dips involved, strong minima will occur at wedges oriented
magnetic towards
north, and corresponding maxima will occur when the wedge is oriented south. A situation typical along the Granulite Belt has magnetic rocks thrusted on magnetic rocks (usually with differently oriented structures). Similar structures have been
identified
Nordkalott
in
Project
a
few
area.
thrusted units are generally sity, a different situation more magnetic tected beneath Culcuiation
other As
areas the
the
of contacts
of magnetic
ture and where netization
(km)
dislocations.
there is good control
parameters,
normally
estimates will be obtained. have a negative contact
Usually, anomaly
on the mag-
very
good
northern edge. This effect disappears at less than 60 O to the north. Simi arly, southern edges of magnetic structures a maximum is developed (inside the contact) disappears when the dip is smaller than 60 north. Regional
dip
all structures outside their dips
of
on the contact which o to the
crustal structures
Caledonian
of low magnetic intenis created where the
Precambrian structures the Caledonides.
of dips
in
and interpretation
displacement
displacement
can be de-
or sheet-like
bodies
The dips of a large number of locally significant magnetic structures have been analyzed. For this purpose, the magnetic anomalies have been digitized from original maps and analyzed with an interactive model calculation program. The total intensity magnetic anomaly is very sensitive to variations in the orientation of the magnetic struc-
Grauity crustal blocks (Fig-. 7) Paired regional anomaly belts Three sets of paired (positive and anomaly belts appear in the Bouguer
negative) anomaly
map. One follows the continental edge to the west and the shelf-continent transition to the north. The positive anomaly is located off the coast and the negative anomaly is centred on the high elevated areas of the Caledonian mountains up to Porsangen fjord. The amplitude variation is from - 125 to + 120 mGa1. The second paired anomaly set follows the northeastern coastal areas from Porsangen where the positive anomaly is near the
-‘
pp.61-62 i
pp. 63-64
AEROMAGNETIC ANOMALY MAP NORTHERN FENNOSCANDIA TOTAL INTENSITY
REFERRED CoMpILEDAi
TD ,OGFiF-65
c
A
Pp. 65-68
,.T1_^_.^.-
r_
,~^-_.
..r,/.
^_
.IW__
MAGNETIC
CRUSTAL
STRUCTURES
IN NORTHERN
FENNOSCANDIA
69 ,POR$ANGEN
Fig. 7. Crustal
gravity
2
Crustal
gravity
Block
blocks.
to be displaced across major fault zones. In particular, the section between the Bothnian-Senja and the Bothnian-Seiland fault zones shows an anomalous pattern. The anomaly pair along the shelf edge represents the combined effects of a higher level Moho and the layer of low-density sediment (i.e. the thinning of the crystalline crust). East of Porsangen, the negative part of the anomaly pair is subdued, a thinning of the crust
coast and paralleled by a negative anomaly which is not correlated with any topographic relief. The amplitude variation is from - 35 to + 30 mGa1. The third anomaly pair follows the Granulite Belt, which gives rise to a positive gravity anomaly and a slight rise in the terrain which is flanked by a gravity low to the west and south. The amplitude variation is from - 50 to + 15 mGa1. The anomaly pairs of the continental edge can be seen
TABLE
FJORD
blocks Characteristics
Average Bouguer anomaly
(mGa1)
I
+100
Oceanic crust.
Ia
+130
Thinned
II
+40 to +70 0 to -25
III
crust.
Continental
edge, thinned
Sedimentary
cover on thinned
IV
+15 too
Granulite
Belt, tbrusted
Va
-t70
Local mafic intrusion surrounding
Vb VI
- 25
Continental
VII
-50
Normal
VIII IX X
Local circular
-35 0
crust.
middle crust diameter
of 50 km, approx.
depth 11 km, and
area of deformation. crust with fairly high gravity,
continental
Continental
-100
crust.
thinner
than VII.
shield crust.
crust with low gravity, felsic intrusion
Local, larger basement
thicker
or impact
culmination.
than VII (maximum
structure,
diameter
elevated
terrain).
65 km, approx.
depth 7-X km.
70
by about 10 km explains the positive part of the anomaly pair. In the case of the Granulite Belt anomaly pair, the negative anomaly represents a down-warping of the crust caused by the accumulation of heavy middle crustal materials (granulite facies rocks) down to about the 17 km depth in the belt proper. A detailed model of the Granulite Belt may be found in Marker et al. (1990).
H. HENKEL
continent. The proposed suture is also partly visible on the aeromagnetic map. The +130 mGa1 Lofoten high and other anomalies over the thinned
TABLE Magnetic Discon-
Crustal gravity blocks Gravity blocks have been included here as background for the larger and deeper anomalous parts of the crust as compared to the shallow and smaller magnetic sources. These blocks are defined by their average relative Bouguer anomalies and boundary gradients and they represent large parts of the crust with different composition and/or thickness. A few more local blocks/structures have been included as they produce characteristic gravity anomalies. The blocks that may be seen are listed in Table 2. A change in the surface gravity of 40 mGal may correspond to a crustal thickness variation of 2-4 km, depending on the density contrast at the Moho. Apart from the described paired anomalies and blocks, numerous positive low-gradient anomalies appear to represent basement domes at different depths, as demonstrated in Lindroos and Henkel (1978) and Olesen and So& (1985). Remaining sharp gradient anomalies belong to various upper crustal sources such as granite intrusions (lows) and greenstone structures (highs).
discontinuities Characteristics
tinuity 1
Granulite
Belt southern
and western
Magnetic
thrust
are discordantly
slivers
magnetic
Precambrian
continuity
is large
dips about
20”
patterns. along
thrust
front.
piled on
The angular
the southern
dis-
edge and
to the north (Knorring
and Lund,
1988). 2
Southern
edge of discordant
Large angular 3
Eastern and
edge of N-S
striking
gravity
sinistral
Continuation
set of shear
gradier ts.
Large
offset of Precambrian
and
Marker,
fault zone(s) (Henkel,
zones locally
up to 40 km wide.
edge of approximately
of magnetic
unit.
batholiths
accu-
megashear Both-
1988). Sets of
1500 km long belt
extending
to 200 km wide (described
zones
structures.
1986) or of the
man-Seiland
Eastern
banded
of the Baltic-Bothnian
(Berthelsen
4
magnetic
discontinuity.
associated
mulated
to the south;
in Henkel
up
and Eriks-
son, 1986). 5
Northern
edge
(pm-Atlantic
of Precambrian
suture?}.
shield
Interrupted
structures
by discontinu-
ity 10. 6
7
Major crustal discontinuities The combination of the Bouguer anomaly with magnetic anomaly inte~retation allows a more complete delineation of major crustal discontinuities. Along the western flank of the negative Caledonian anomaly, several distinct gradients mark the termination towards the east of the western crustal structures. Similarly, anomalies belonging to eastern structural patterns are terminated. These discontinuities are tentatively interpreted as the suture zone created by the closure of Iapetus and the pre-Atlantic rifting tectonism. The slice of continental crust between this structure and the oceanic Atlantic crust is thus material belonging to the old Greenland and American
3
Western
edge of magnetic
trending
shear zones with large dextral?
Northern
edge
complex
greenstone
and
minor
of
E-W
trending
Appears
older magnetic
mafic intrusive
province.
9
Caledonian
eastern
front.
Precambrian 10
magnetically intrusives
structures.
Caledonian
thrust
offset.
:o be discordant
8
low magnetism
several NE-
belt with associated
branches.
with numerous
batholiths;
are discordantly
Thrust
slivers of
piled on magnetic
structures.
Bothnian-Senja
shear
zone
(Henkel,
1988).
Lo-
cally 80 km wide set of faults. 11
Edge of oceanic fracture netic tion
crust along continuation
zone to the north
oceanic
anomalies).
off the Norwegian
First identifiable
oceanic
age 58 Ma) (Kovacs
of Senja
(with discordant Parallel coast
mag-
with rift direc-
to the southwest.
magnetic
et al., 1986).
anomaly
(24B,
MAGNETIC
CRUSTAL
-6-
STRUCTURES
MAGNETIC
IN NORTHERN
FENNOSCANDIA
71
5lSCONTlNUlTY
L\
EOTHNIAN-SENJA
-:k
LOCAL STRUCTURAL
FAULT ZONE TRENDS
,,
,’
Fig. 8. Major magnetic
continental crust represent horsts of or thrusted lower to middle crustal slivers with, exposed at the surface in places, high-grade rocks (Olesen et al., this issue).
Fig. 9. Magnetic
upper crustal
discontinuities.
Kajar magnetic di~co~tinuitjes (Fig. 8) Several important discontinuities in the magnetic patterns can be inferred, along which re-
units. For explanation
of figures, see Table 4.
H. HENKEL
12
TABLE Magnetic
4 blocks
and units Characteristics
Block/unit Number
Name
1. Oceanic crust 11
Several parallel
Fallat
First positive
NE-striking anomaly
positive
and negative
at continental
magnetic
anomalies
edge is 24B (age 58 Ma) (Kovacs
et al., 1986).
2. Units west of Protogine Belt 21
Stuora Njuorjot
High-magnetic
22
Skoarra
Low magnetic
(high-grade) irregular
irregular
patterns.
patterns.
23
Lafol
Deep-seated
irregular
24
Cagan
Deep-seated
low-magnetic
magnetic
25
Unna Njuorjot
High-magnetic
pattern.
patterns.
(high-grade)
irregular
patterns.
3. Northern shelf area 31
SkilTi
Very deep seated low-magnetic
32
Davit Goaskin
Very deep seated high-magnetic
source.
33
Luosat
Very deep seated low and intermediate
34
Goalsi
Intermediate
deep-seated
high-magnetic
sources.
magnetic
magnetic
sources.
sources.
4. Protogine Belt 41
Lulit Goaskin
Deep-seated
42
Gironat
High-magnetic
banded
5. Between eastern edge of Protogine Belt and Bothnian-Seiland
irregular
zone
51
Albbas
High-magnetic
52
Geatki
Area dominated
by banded
53
Idjalotti
Area dominated
by high-magnetic
(high-grade?)
and several basement 54
Low-magnetic
Buoidda
6. Between Bothnian-Seiland
pattern.
pattern.
irregular pattern,
pattern,
basement
with several basement irregular
pattern,
regions
pattern.
zone and Granulite Belt
Njoammilat
Intermediate
62
Boazu
Large low-magnetic
63
Guorggat
Intermediate
64
Dovtta
Low-magnetic
65
Guovssahat
Irregular
magnetic
66
Vintanat
Banded
61
Skiret
Low-magnetic
banded
basement
magnetic irregular
pattern
(high grade?)
pattern. culmination.
banded
pattern
area with deep-seated
and several basement
pattern
and low-magnetic high-magnetic
pattern
72
Sarvva
Area dominated
-72
Gumppet
High-magnetic
irregular
by intermediate pattern.
anomalies.
and basement
culmination.
High-magnetic
irregular
pattern.
banded
banded
pattern.
8. Seiland intrusive province Giehka 2
91
Biebanat
High-magnetic
92
Oarre
Area dominated
pattern.
by low-magnetic
irregular
pattern.
IO. West-east belt of magnetic structures 101
Oarjit Vielpat
High (locally
very high) magnetic
banded
pattern
area.
102
Nuorttat
High (locally very high) magnetic
banded
pattern
area.
Vielpat
sources
culminations.
area with pyrrhotite-type irregular
irregular
pattern.
7. East and north of Granulite thrust front
9. Southeast of discontinuity
culminations
with banded
domes.
irregular
61
81
culmination
pattern
73
MAGNETIC CRUSTAL STRUtTURE.S IN NORTHERN FENNOSCANDIA
gional structures are terminated. Some of these magnetic ~scontinuities are also associated with gravity gradients indicating major changes in crustal structure, composition or thickness. These discontinuities are briefly described in Table 3. Together with a set of NW-trending shear zones, the shear zones were probably reactivated in connection with the Atlantic opening and the development of the Atlantic-Arctic shift of the rift zone. The NE-trending set of zones (1, Fig. lo) probably formed just prior to the Atlantic opening (pre-60 Ma) and the N-trending (discontinuity 3) and NW-trending set of zones (B, Fig. 10) when the north Greenland and SvaIbard foldbelts were formed by dextral strike-slip movements (60-30 Ma) (Harland, 1979, Schack et al., 1987). Coincidence with gravity discontinuities is observed along discontinuity 1, 2, 11, several parts of 3, and the northern part of 6. There is large uncertainty concerning the southwestern part of ~s~ntin~ty 5. Gravity discontinuities indicate a more western location of the pre-Atlantic suture. Discontinuity 2, which is only represented with a small section in the Nordkalott area, continues for about 200 km to the south. Major magnetic crustal blocks and units {Fig. 9) These blocks are bounded by the discontinuities described above and are defined by characteristic patterns and/or anomaly levels. These characteristic patterns and anomaly levels may represent uppermost crustal structural features or, in the case of larger anomalous areas, structures extending to considerable depths, but still remaining in the upper crust. The magnetic units are smaIler regions with more homog~eo~ anomaly patterns. Notice that the thrusted cover of Caledonian rocks is magnetically transparent, allowing continuation of the basement structures beneath the Caledonides. The magnetic blocks and units that have been identified are listed in Table 4. Around magnetic unit 81 (Giehka), a near-circular magnetic halo with disturbances due to adjacent structures is observed. This phenomenon has probably been caused by the deformation induced in the surrounding strata on the intrusion of the mafic rocks (Arkko, 1986).
TABLE
5
Regional dislocation zones Line-
Characteristics
ament A
Homavan
shear zone: a sin&al
NW-stung
zone
which can be followed to zone J (a southern zone parallel to H). B
Boar-Senja
shear zone: a ~nt~nuati3n of Senja
fracture zone towards the south-southeast and southeast. Wide sinistral (approx.
45 km)
shear zone,
length approximately 4300 km. C
Botch-oiled
shear zone: a ~n~u;~tion
B~tic-Bother
of the
megashear (Berthelsen and Marker,
1986); N/NNW-trending
set of shear zones from the
Bay of Bothnia to the intrusive Seiland province or southern edge of zone H. Associated gravity anomaly (low to the east) and several major discordances. D
White Sea lineament: a topographic geological line with distinct magnetic trace through Granulite Belt; sin&ml displacement about 30 km possible, trends towards Seiland.
E
NW-trending
lineament with possible continuation
through Kola Peninsula, sin&al
displacement ap-
prox. 10 km. F
NNW-trending lineament: eastern branch could continue approx. 1500 km to the south, possible sinistral displacement approx. 10 km.
G
Porsangen invent:
approx. 800 km long, NNE-
trending, small movement of approx. 50 km? Reactivation in late glacial times (Olesen, 1?88). H
NE-trending Vestfjorden shear zone, approx. 200 km wide set of zones with very large dextral displacement (300 km with reference to the Protogine Belt structures). Approx. length at least 600 km beyond the Seiland intrusive province.
I
Lies north of and parallel to (H), displaces Protogine
J
Lies south of and parallel to (H), displaced Protogine
Belt reference structures approx. 135 km dextrally.
Belt reference strnctures approx. 260 km dextrally. K
NW-trending
lineaments
east of discontinuity
terminate at Bothnian-Seiiand
3,
shear zone (C).
Major magnetic dislocation systems {Fig. lo) Interpretation of the aeromagnetic map indicates the locations of major dislocations, and this information allows the definition of a number of regional dislocation zones (Table 5).
H. HENKEL
B
‘. . : BARENTS
SEA
0A’i OF BdTHNlA Fig.
10. Generalized
magnetic
dislocations
mark the western
edge of the Protogine
(2). For explanation
Along several shear zones, and especially along the Both&n-Senja and the Both&n-Seiland zones, typical shear lens patterns are visible, indicating intense transpressional strike-slip movements. By means of this process, lower stratigraphic units are thrust up on higher units while at the same time being displaced considerable distances. As a shear zone consists of a network of many individual faults, an overprinted pattern of mismatch tens of kilometres wide emerges (Henkel, 1988). The spatial frequency of such shear zones seems to be low: there are only two prominent examples in the Nordkalott study area (500 x 700 km). When overprinting is across older shear zones, a new shear lens pattern oriented parallel to the younger zone will dominate. This is apparently the
of letters,
Belt (1) and its possible
continus.tion
to the north
see Table 5.
case where zones H, I and J are traversed by the NNW-trending Bothnian-Senja shear zone. Low-angle faults are not readily identified in the aeromagnetic measurements except where large displacements have created characteristic discontinuities. Apart from the two large thrust fronts, the Caledonian and the Grant&e Belt, only minor thrusts have been identified. One is along parts of the northern edge of magnetic units 101 and 102 (Vielpat), the W-E
Generalized
trending greenst’one belt.
dyke occurrences (Fig. 1 I)
In the Nordkalott Project area, only minor magnetic dykes or dyke swarms have been found
MAGNETICCRUSTALSTRU~TURESINNORTHERN
..-‘-
STEEP
DYKES NORMAL NRM
,./
STEEP
DYKES REVERSED
. ...*+ .
75
FENNOSCANDIA
b
NRM
SILLS CONICAL DY
Fig. 11. Generalized dyke occurrence. For explanation of figures, see Table 6.
in the Precambrian shield region. They are indicated in the aeromagnetic interpretation map (Henkel, 1986) and in Fig. 11 a general compilation has been made. It should be noticed that only magnetic dykes wider than 10-20 m can be detected by the low to intermediate elevation aeromagnetic measurements. In addition, small (short) dykes are more readily identified in areas
with low magnetic variation (e.g. in basement culminations). The absence of large and dense dyke swarms shows that the entire area has remained distal to rifting events. A province of conical mafic dykes is associated with the basement culmination at Muorionalusta (crustal gravity block X) described by Lindroos and Henkel (1978). In the southwestern region, a
TABLE 6 Dyke systems Area
Dyke trend
Other characteristics
1
NNE
Small dykes in basement culmination.
2
NE
Individual, larger dykes with reversed NRM
3
N
Basement creation, large, slightly arcuate dykes do~nating northeast and northwest.
4
COniI?d
Four conical mafic dykes in large basement culmination
5
Ffat
Set of many small and several large sills; smaller, N-trending dykes also occur.
6
NW
Several large dykes, smaller NE-trending dykes also occur.
7
WNW and E-W
The only area with WNW- and E-W trending dykes, NE-trending dykes occur also.
smaller dykes striking
H. HENKEL
16
set of mafic (Witschard,
sills
forms
a prominent
1975). Table
erties of the different Depth to magnetic
structure
6 lists some of the prop-
a reasonably
study,
the automatically
calibrated
dyke systems.
basement
attain
(Fig. 12)
front,
the Precambrian
generally sheets
west
low-magnetic
of the Caledonian structures sediments
of low-magnetic
autocorrelation
are overlain and/or
metamorphic
method
(1982) has been applied
described for mapping
the top of the magnetic calculations along profiles
thrust tbrusted
rocks. by
by The to
structures. Automatic were made at intervals
of 6-8 km, and in the interpretation contours of the depth to the magnetic basement were drawn at 1 km intervals
(Lind,
1986a).
Low-magnetic
calculations
properties
Caledonides.
A few areas
In
show indications
the interpretation
map.
using
observed
the re-
of deep magnetic One
small high-magnetic cover
resents
the deeper
Profiles
type
of low-magnetic is connected of high-magnetic parts
known
in the Precambrian
by a thin
volumes
were
outside
comprises
surface
a pilot
depths
and these areas have been indicated
type of indication
Thorning
the depth
model
thickness.
determined
magnetization gions In the region
by
great
sources
separately
in
of indication
structures
overlain
rocks.
Another
with large, bodies
near-
and rep-
of these bodies.
across some basement
culminations
in the
Precambrian
au-
tochthonous Precambrian sediments cannot be separated from thrusted low-magnetic units and are included in the low-magnetic cover thickness.
Two
basement
culminations
elled along profiles using anomalies and petrophysical
Tests were run to illustrate the magnetic effects of thrusted Precambrian units (which have magnetization parameters similar to the outcropping Pre-
alusta
structure
cambrian) and show that such units will not generate significant magnetic anomalies until they
stones) deformed in turn overlie
(crustal
have
gravity
southern part of magnetic surrounded by supracrustal
been
mod-
gravity and magnetic data. The Muonionblock
X) in the
unit 52 (Geatki) is rocks (mainly green-
by underlying granitoids, which acid-intermediate high-grade
Fig. 12. Depth to magnetic basement. Contours at intervals of 2.5 km below sea level. Dotted line denotes larger deep magnetic sources in the shield region.
MAGNETIC
CRUSTAL
gneisses.
The structure
km (Lindroos
STRUCTURES
IN NORTHERN
has an amplitude
and Henkel,
The Gallivare
in the northern
unit 53 (Idjalottit)
magnetic
low with a diameter
structure
is encircled
consists
of low-density
nying
low-gradient
seated,
denser,
Conclusions
is a rounded
granitoids.
gravity
high
rocks
and
The accompaindicates
intermediate
deep-
composition
rocks rising 6 km to a depth of about
Some
central
of about 50 km. The
by supracrustal
more
of 8-10
3 km (Lind,
cerning
general
1986b). Because
there
are
numerous
similar
gravity
in magnetic blocks 5 and 6 with various magnetic anomalies, it is proposed that
these structures
represent
lying among occurrences
basement
by
volumes
rocks
while
of
(mainly greenstones). High-magnetic deep-seated sources are interpreted
rocks
anomalies of as high-grade
(granulite facies) rocks, in accordance with the findings in Lofoten (Olesen et al., this issue). In a few cases, the cause of the basement culminations is plate tectonic (thrusting and shearing), but they are mainly attributed to gravitational compensation of crustal
loading
with dense volcanic
the
restricted
con-
in a large
crust of the Baltic Shield. fact
have
that
measurements only
significant
of rocks
induced
very
small
remanence
to mafic intrusions
the majority to
patterns
of aeromagnetic
is simplified (mainly
can be drawn
structural
section of the continental The interpretation
and dykes),
have a 10~ ratio
magnetization
1988). This allows the interpretation
to be focussed
The
determination
(banded,
dyke-like
of
magnetic
and irregular)
patterns
is an instrument
for distinguishing between supracrustal, hypabyssal and plutonic lithologies; such an interpretation
must, however,
be based on original
data
+
4 M
++*++: ++++
rocks,
/
which causes the regions between the greenstone volcanic belts to rise. As the greenstones were mostly deposited on an acid (low-density) crust, the induced compensated usually
have
gravitational by granite diameters
instability diapirism of about
is also locally Such diapirs 5 km (Henkel,
1978). Figure 13 summarizes the general cal aspects of the basement culminations.
geophysi-
Caledonian
thrusted units
Major magnetic discontinulties banded MAGNETIC
pattern
Generalized
magnetic dislocations
high gmdwnts Short wwdengths
Generaked trends in magnetic banded pattern areas Generalized
high-mognetr
Basement
trends of oceanic magnetic bands culminations
Magnetic batholiths
I
lnternwdiote gramto~ds d
Fig. 13. Schematic W-E
grontte
-_= dlaplrs
profile through basement culmination
structures. The magnetic edge minima will have variable amplitudes due to the strike direction, the dip and the depth extent of the high magnetic rocks.
of
(Henkel,
on structural aspects, including dip determinations of contacts and magnetic bands.
culminations
of metasupracrustal
conclusions
the magnetic
remanent
structures associated
(Fig. 14)
1978).
structure
part of magnetic
71
FENNOSCANDIA
Large mafic intrusives Carbonatites Kiruna - Kolari greenstone 0
I
belt
100 km
t
Fig. 14. Magnetic crustal structures.
78
H. HENKEL
with high spatial magnetic ology, ring
resolution.
patterns
bimodal
may
observable
basic
tool for determination
dislocations
fault zones. Again,
various
of magneti-
of structures of steep
for the mapping
forming
is a
faults
Steep faults make up networks extent,
lithologies vertically,
and
resoluof these of con-
fault zones in which rock
are strongly dispersed horizontally and mainly as lens-shaped fragments of
dimensions.
the Nordkalott
Two such zones are noted
area,
the Bothnian-Senja
the Both&r-Seiland fault
zones.
in and
It is suspected
that these zones define areas in the upper continental crust where plate tectonic stresses are being continually (at variable rates over time) released. Discontinuities in the orientation of magnetic structures indicate the occurrence of low-angle fault zones. In the study area, several prominent examples are noticed. As there is a marked magnetic difference between Precambrian and younger lithologies
greenstone
structures
compensating
the
belts.
Acknowledgements
unimodal
data with high spatial
are a prerequisite
siderable
gravitational
occur-
in contrast,
having
and interpretation
cally
tion
and,
usually
lith-
as
distributions.
The occurrence
structures.
with
distributions
rocks,
rock lithologies
susceptibility
the banded
be correlated
susceptibility
in metasupracrnstal
plutonic
Further
(the
latter
being
generally
low-mag-
netic), it is possible to trace the continuation of the overthrusted structures beneath the thrusted lithologies. The mapped magnetic bound the magnetic crustal blocks Some of the discontinuities crustal sutures (or rather There may be significant
mark
discontinuities seen in Fig. 9. the location
the preceding discrepancies
of
rifting). between
the magnetic and gravity features associated with larger discontinuities as gravity anomalies arise from the entire lithospheric structure, while magnetic anomalies have their dominant sources in the upper crust. In addition, large gravity distortions tend to become compensated by processes and tectonic movements.
metamorphic
In two of the magnetic crustal blocks (5 and 6) significant amounts of greenstones occur, and a particular pattern of basement culminations appears to be related to these occurrences. These culminations represent upheavals of deeper, more dense parts of the upper crust and are interpreted
The 1 : l,OOO,OOOscale aeromagnetic tion map of the Nordkalott
project
cooperation
between
scientists
surveys
Finland
(Heikki
of
Tahvanainen),
Norway
and Atle Sindre) Hult,
Juhani
of the geological Saavuori
(Ola Kihle,
and Sweden
Korkealaakso
interpreta-
is the result of and
Odleiv
(Vesa Arkko,
and Jonas
Iris
Olesen Karin
Lind).
Dan
Nisca at the Swedish Geological Co. also contributed to the interpretation work. The depth to the magnetic
basement
performed
at the Geological
in Copenhagen Thoming.
interpretations
with
The naming
suggested by Lars checked the North
Survey
the kind
were
of Greenland
assistance
of magnetic
partly of Leif
provinces
was
Granar, and Hakan Rydving Lapp names. I would like to
express my gratitude to all these colleagues for lively discussion, good cooperation, and their interest in making the interpretation map. The project leader, Gunnar Kautsky, constantly encouraged all the participants.
References Arkko, V., 1986. The Nordkalott project-geophysical
aspects
of large mafic intrusions in northern Sweden. Geol. Surv. Swed. BRAP 86 401. Berthelsen, A. and Marker, M., 1986. 1.9-1.8
Ga old strike-slip
megashears in the Baltic shield and their plate tectonic implications. Tectonophysics,
128: 163-181.
Harland, W.B., 1979. A review of major fault zones in Svalbard. In: Proc. Conf. VIII-Analysis
of Actual Fault Zones
in Bedrock. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. 79-1239. Henkel, H., 1978. Density as a tectonic motor-diapirism
in
northern Sweden from magnetic, gravity and petrophysical interpretation. Univ. Aarhus, Geoskr. 10. Henkel, H., 1984. The Nordkalott project-flymagnetisk
tolkn-
ing. Geol. Surv. Swed., Geophys. Dep. Rep. 8404. Henkel, H., 1986. Aeromagnetic interpretation map of Northem Fennoscandia.
Geol. Survs. Fin]., Norw. and Swed.
(ISBN 91-7158-376-9). Henkel, H., 1988. Tectonic
studies in the Lansjarv region.
Swed. Nucl. Fuel Waste Manage. Co. Tech. Rep. 88-07. Henkel, H. and Eriksson, 1986. Regional aeromagnetic and gravity studies in Scandinavia. Precambrian Res., 35: 169180.
MAGNETIC
CRUSTAL
STRUCI’lJRES
IN NORTHERN
FENNOSCANDIA
Henkel, H. and Guzman, M., 1977. Magnetic features of fracture zones. Geoexploration, 15: 173-181. Marker, M., Henkel, H. and Lee, M.K., 1990. Combined gravity and magnetic modelling of the Tanaelv and Lapland Granulite belts, Polar Profile, Northern Baltic Shield. In: R. Freeman et al. (Editors), The European Geotraverse -Integrated Studies, Results from the 5th Study Centre. Eur. Sci. Found., ISBN Z-903148-64-3, pp. 67-76. Korhonen, J.V., 1986. Aeromagnetic anomaly map of Northern Fennoscandia. Geol. Survs. Finl. Norw. and Swed. (ISBN 91-7158-375-O). Korhonen, J.V. and Kiviniemi, A., 1986. Bouguer anomaly map of Northern Fennoscandia. Geol. Survs. Finl. Norw. and Swed. (ISBN 91-7158-374-2). Kovacs. L.C., Berero, C., Johnson, G.L., Pilger, R.H., Taylor, P.T. and Vogt, P.R., 1986. Residual magnetic anomaly chart of the Arctic Ocean repion. U.S. Nav. Res. Lab. and Nav. Res. Dev. Act. Sheet 1. Lind, J., 1986a. The Nordkalott project-flygmagnetisk tolkning av Svenska Kaledonidema. Geol. Surv. Swed. BRAP 86 407. Lind, J., 1986b. The Nordkalott project-en kombinerad tolkning av domstrukturen i Gallivare-Vittangi omradet. Geol. Surv. Swed. BRAP 86 406. Lindroos, H. and Henkel, H., 1978. Regional geological and
79 geophysical inte~retation of ~~arnb~an structures in northeastern Sweden. Geol. Surv. Swed., Ser C, No. 751. Lindroos, H. and Henkel, H., 1981. Besknvning till berggrundskartan Huuki och Muonionalusta. Geol. Surv. Swed., Ser. Af, No. 35-39 Olesen, O., 1988. The Stuoragurra fault: evidence of neotectonits in the Precambrian of Finnmark, northern Norway. Nor. Geoi. Tidskr., 62-2: 107-118. Olesen, 0. and Solli, A., 1985. Geophysical and geological interpretation of regional structures within the Precambrian Kautokeino greenstone belt, Finnmark, northern Norway. Geol. Surv. Norw. Bull., 403: 119-129. Olesen, 0.. Roberts, D., Henkel, H., Lile, O.-B. and Torsvik, T.H., 1990. Aeromagnetic and gravimetric interpretation of regional structural features in the Caledonides of west Finnmark and North Troms, northern Norway. Geol. Surv. Nor. Bull., 419: l-24. Schack Pedersen, S.A. and Hakansson, E., 1987. Structural styles of Wandel Hav strike-slip mobile belt. In: Abstr. Nordic Geol. Meet., 18th. Geol. Surv. Den., pp. 441-442. (ISBN 87-88640-07-09). Thorn@, L., 1982. Processing and interpretation of aeromag netic data. Geol. Surv. Greenland Rep. No. 114. Witschard, F., 1975. Description of the Fjallasen geological maps. Geol. Snrv. Swed., Ser. Af, No. 17-20.