Superlattices
and Microstructures,
357
Vol. 10, No. 3, 799 7
MAGNETOPLASMON SPECTRUM OF A MODULATION-DOPED SEMICONDUCTOR SUPEBLATTICE WITH PERIODIC DEFECTS Godfrey Gumbs of Physics, University
Department
Lethbridge,
Alberta TlK
of L&bridge
3iU& Canada
H.L. Cui and N.J.M. Horing Department of Physic8 and Engineering Physics Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey 07090
(Received 13 August 1990)
The newly proposed modulation doped superlattice with periodic defects simulated by positive potential barriers in the quantum wells of the superlattice has been shown to feature minibands of controllable widths and separations, by adjusting the position and height of the barriers within the wells. We demonstrate that such interesting properties of the single-particle spectrum are correspondingly reflected in the magnetoplasmon excitations of the same structure. A self-consistent field RPA approach is employed here to examine the inter-subband and intra-subband magnetoplasmon spectra of the modulation doped superlattice, with particular attention given to the effects of the positive potential barrier (defect) on these collective charge density modes in a magnetic field.
In the present paper, we extend this work to incorpo
The striking sensitivity of superlattice energy sub band structure to variations of the geometric parame
rate. the role of a magnetic
ters of barriers in the quantum well regions, as eluci-
izing the study of dielectric response properties,
dated by Beltram and Capasso’ as well as by Pee&s
termining
Vasilopoulos,2
hss prompted
further investigations
rok of defects in superlattices dielectric
response
superlattice within
properties
with rectangular
the random
the plasmon
we demonstrated subbsnd
quantum
toplasmon spectrum, including intra-subband and inter-
of a multi-quantum-well defect barriers carried out
with corresponding Moreover, variations
and intratuned sub well, such in the
40k, an order of magnitude inplasma frequency,
changes in the intra-subband of the collective excitation
cies follow closely the electron energy subband
07494036/91/070357+04
mode. frequen-
structures
via the defect barrier.
$02.00/O
barrier, as
ekctric response propertiea in this situation have been
by varying the defect barrier
and are therefore equally tunable
on features
In that work,
its height, and its position
crease is obtained in the inter-subband
we focus attention
associated with the positive defect potential they are modified
of the barrier in the quantum
width from 0 to about
Specifically,
perlattice.
we examined’
that both the inter-subband
well. For example,
and de-
field on the magne-
subband magnetoplasmons of the modulation doped su-
for such a system.
ss the barrier width,
of the magnetic
of the
plasma frequencies can be dlectively
ject to variations
the e&&s
general-
In a recent study of the
phase approximation,
spectrum
and
field, appropriately
by a magnetic
field probe.
The di-
formally examined in the literature in the presence of a lattice/supe.rlattice6~11, and -separatelyof
a
in the presence
magnetic field.12 The problem at hand involves tak-
ing munt complex
of both featurez jointly, unit cell needed
to describe
odically placed in the supczlattia are in turn periodically
and including the ddects
quantum
distributed
the peri-
wells which
in the z-direction.
ThemagneticfiddB=Biiakotakentobeintbe z-direction,
driving electrons into Landau-quantized
cularorbitsinthez-lyplane. eigenstatez,
cir-
Theunperturbaienergy
chosen in the gauge for which
the magnetic
0 1991 Academic Press Limited
358
Superlattices
vectorpotmtid is A
Ike,
&, are the norm&d
fun4n.u
Vol. 10, No. 3, 199 1
M
harmonic ordilator eigen-
having the cycAotron orbit centered at z+, with
tlm cycbtron hgth
= (0, Bz, O), mby be written
and Microstructures,
frequency w,, and L, ia a normdizatiot~
in the plimction.
the pubdic Paey
potdid
Y,c,(s) ir a Blo& function in
model. The bated
*
,b
of the r-direction for the Kronig-
r
electronic energia are
EL,,+. = (n + l/2) hw, + M,,
(2)
Fig.
-1
1
1: Itepatation
of the potential pro6le in
a superlattice containing one defect barrier of width d.
with m am mbband index and -111 < ks c 111. The
The center of the defect h at a distance a from the middle
rupe&ttice
of the quantum well. The width of the quantum well ie
hi
paiod 1 dong the z-direction, L. = Nl
~NirtbenumbaofunitalLJoIyther-direction. rsr,,,,c, P e*+,,,~~(r)
CXp<OW.
ir a Bbch function; u+,(s)
ir pe
rindicaadmaybeexpa&din~Fourieraeriatoobtain
The longitudinal dielectric function of the random
rraprasDktionintemudreciproc.allatticevectomC: UI&)
. ammpdmg 2nr/l
= F c(k, - G) c-~‘,
to the raid
the -ice
pot&M
(n = 0,*1,*2,.-a).
three caqmnaxta
(3)
lattice repraeatation V(z) = &
of
with G =
V’p,
We retain only the Er8t
of the auwlattia
potatial
expa&onbrtheBbchfunction,uinRef. &
phue appmxinution
in the VCJ-
may be written in reciprocal lattice
representation M Rx7 (q,w) =&a~~ -~(e,qz+G)~~+w~),
(5)
where wavevector q = (&qs), and frequency= W, and I( L the background diebetric constant. Also
4,withthe
u (Q,qs + G) % (~*c’/K) [I$ + (qs + G)‘]-1 ,
(I - 2T/l)
and the noninkacting
density-density correlatii
(6) func-
tionia
I (q,(Q) =
x&a c h#C*SIC’ XL,*
(k.,q,,w)z~,,,(I;,q,,G)
(k*,q*,G).
(7)
Inthb, d Lrl
Am0,) = [1+ a; (k,)’ + a; (ks)‘)-lD
(ks, qs, 6’) = f ~‘dz~*,(z)e-~~~~r,+r.(E),
and the in&all&ion of the magnetic field yielding
Rxa&&&angulud&ctofwidthdaadheight x&s
v,,amtaalin~quutumweUofwidthloboamledby quare~ofwidthkandlw&htV,(aeeFig.
(k*,e,w)
=
l),
C,,,(#)
= (n!/n’!)za’-ac-c[L~‘-a(z)]~,
where ;t = ~f2m*we, m+rl,
n,) and f(E)
and n’ = mar(nl,na),
n =
b the Fexmi distribution.
Other
359
Superlattices and Microstructures, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1991 u8ehlrep?aaltatioManlldbeobtainedfromamani-
F f
(km)
= [Cn~.l~Cl,
,+1/2, at T = 0 (17a)
feetly gauge invariant treatment employing the magnetic field Green’s function in closed form.1z
= Lk*lliWo
The plasmon dispersion relation is given by
= ;P(-**
aemicluniul zero iield limit
coth (&,/2),
(17b)
nondegeneratelimit (17~)
det 17 (p,w)l = 0. Following our work in Ref. 4, we consider the case in which electron wavefunctions within adjacent quantum
where Eq. (17d) ia the de &as-van Alphen (d&A)
wells overlap substantially, and only a few reciprocal lat-
for ubitruy
tice vectors need be considered. Moreover, our concern
to be added to the aemiclaokal zero fidd limit. Aloo,
here is focused on long wavelengths, corresponding to
[...I,,,.= 1 b the maximum intega function and (n&S 3
q* a 2r/Z and q
( - h$, 18a shifted chemical potential.
a (li/(m*w.)), the
magnetic length.
La&
part
factor g* and temperature,which ir
Under these conditions the modes satisfy 1 - ” (a (I*)@I? (9, w) = 0.
(9)
5
a
This low-wavenumber dispersion relation is restricted to intra-subband plasmons hybridized with the cyclotron frequency in accordancewith
1=&[l+&]8in~e+go8~e,(10) where&$ = 4re’&,/rtml, correapondato an etktive bulk plasmon, for a closed-packed ruperlattice, & ia given by
(12)
J(‘)(m, k.) wherei=O,1,2,.-.
P
f
~‘d.u+,(*)~u;~~(‘ (13))) and J(m, ks) = J(O)(m,k,),
Fig.
2: &gnetopkuna
frequencia aa function
of the defect barrier width d. Magnetic field drcqth
Angle of propagation e = 45*. other pa25OA, b = 5OA, w = 2OOA, s= 0, V, = 313meV, V, = 228meV, and electron sheet density
B = 2T.
rametem are I=
7kj = 1.5 x 1o’%m-1. curve aE high frequent root of
W (m, k,) P 25 (m, k,) J(l) (m, k.) .
(14)
Also, sing = i/ (d + q:)“‘, CCIO 0 = q=/ (9” + qi)“‘, and Gi s 4re’i&/icm.l,
where the dktive
(15)
mama m. in the growth direction of
Eq.(lO); curve b: low frequency root of Eq.(lO); curve c: plasma frequency for B = 0.
To &&rate the depauha
d intruubband magn~+
toplasmo~~on the puametan characterizingthe defect barrier, we exhibit in Fii.2 the two mode frcquenciw UI
the superlattice is defined by
&en
by
the two roOt8 of the long-wavelength&per-
sion rdatiin (Eq.(lO)), M functiona d the defectburim width d. The mic CuryiqoutthemunovuLuxkAev&hEq. ueobtain~allimitiifonrmdi&zwt.
(16), Wehve
(for convenience, in&u #pin splitting = LandAll level 9epU&n)”
field rtrength ia takea to be
B=2T,andthepropagationangkisa,uumaitobe g=45*.
Inti&xlation,quantummagneticfiddd-
fectahavebeenn+ctedinthee&tivemaam,akg thegrowthdiiionuweUuintheFermi~.
Ru-
360
Superla!tm?s
thermore, the pg.- correction ir z&o ignored here. For purpoaa
of compukon,
field pkna width
we abo show in Fig.2 the zero-
frequency
(cum
c).
aa a function of
The introduction
the ddect bar&r
of a magnetic
modifying
and Microstructures,
Furthermore,
additional
Cal magnetoplasmon ometric
(curve a) being eua&Uy
with our analysis
rier
(ree diacukon
chu&tiu
mode (curve b) haa more
Ilpucipum
at d = 38A where
To gti
having
StNCtUH,
Mber
the loweat subband attains
insight into the rok of the magnetic
of ddectr,
we note
dau qua&z&on rod ignoring
ellecb
spectrum
together
These points
spectrum
in the na-
in the nonlo
with defect ge
will be addressed
of the intersubband
jointly
magnotoplasm<+ri
excitation.9 in further work in progress’3.
Acknowledgement
- G.G. was supported
in the prea-
Research Council of Cmsda
in part
Sciences and Engineering and the University
of Leth-
bridge Eeae.arch Fund.
that with the neglect of Lan-
in m. (and in the Fermi enera)
the ,9q,-correction,
Eq.(lO) aao&ted
effects.
by a grunt from the Natural plasmon
resonances
a
width’.
fidd in the 6uperlattice ena
tbc defect bar-
in H.ef.4). The lower
frequency
B maximum
of
plasmon
modea rare to be expected
rplitr this mode into two, with the higher frequency one independent
1.Y9 I
wp through m,, and through the Fermi energy
ture of Bernstein
field
\/ol. IO. No. .I
with Fig.2 hu
the &p&on
Referent
relation
the form
1. F. Ekltram and F. Capawo,
Phys. Rev. B38,356Q
(1988). 2. FM. Lett.
ForO=Othareirjurtonemodew-*(j,,withthektkr giivco by Eq.( 15), and the e&t+ dkctio~
si=
mam along the growth
by ma = C~f(&)l
C~f(&)(@cr.Id%).
amall.
tidd &cta
u
quantum
On the other hand,
mic
6dd c&e&
pakttice
mnle
the kmiliu
4
vault
01~ defect
gannetry. spectrum
nmidusical
the clolropack IIII
with the cyclotron w’ -* q
motion
to yield
+ w:, abnent dependence
For arbitrary
factcam cited act jointly, pa
effecta are negligibly
for 0 = r/2,
act to hybridize
angka,
the vuioua
and there ia dependence
00 both the magnetic
of the
fkld through
hybridktkm,
and QL ddect
null magnetic
fkdd, tbezc ia just one branch of the pke=
llX%BpCt~W’ dance
on
dda~t
L+n2e
geometry
++4de,
width is depicted
umml, the m
mngnetic
and P. Varilopouba,
3. G. Gumbo and A. Salman,
through
whae
(j,‘. For
depen-
in Fig.2, curve c. As field inducen umther
G. Gumbs,
5. H. Ehmnreich
6. D. Fak, Phyu. Rev. 116,105
d which asks
from Q.
This nlrtivdy
low-field
at high
magnetic
B to be
Rev.
115,
(1960).
9. If. Lhida,
J. Phys. Sot. Jpn. 65, 4396 (1986).
10. X.L. Lei, R.Q. Yang, and C.H. Thai, in”P/ayrica of
and Quantum weib”, C.H. Thai et.
Supcrlattica
al. ah.
(World Scientific, Singapore,
11. X.D. Zhu, X. Xia, J.J. Quinn,
1989).
and P. Hawrylak,
Phyr. Rev. B 38, 5617 (1988). Phys.
48
A,
7 (1974);
(N.Y.) 31, 1 (1965); snd M. Yildiz,
ibid 85
Phye.
A, 378 (1981); Phyr.
(N.Y.)
Q7,216 (1976); N.J.M. Horing snd M. Yildiz, Phya. Rev. B 8S, 3895 (19&i).
~rpectrumwilibefurtkenrkhedmd
, cmnphd
Rev.
Phys.
N.J.M. Horing and M. Yildiz, Ann. tiple
B 41 10
8. N. Wiser, Phyn. Rev. 12Q, 62 (1963).
of tbc &
in Fig.2,
Rev.
7. S.L. Adler, Phylr. Rev. 120, 413 (1962).
Lett.
are depicted
Phye.
and M.H. Cohen,
hibruy&e,&.18,andthetwoamci&dbruKbm spectrum
Phyr.
786 (1959).
N.J.M. Horing, hf. Ormq
cws~~dbintheirdepaukceondefectwidth,aU
Phys.
publirhed.
12. N.J.M. Horing, Ann.
motilttothekKdpimmoEl&~iorrnwhfuru-
Appl.
124 (1990). 4. ILL. Cui utd
Thiamodedependaondefectgaunetry,&citdevoidof magnetic
Peeten
IS, 1106 (1989).
6eld rtragths,
LUldulqua&i&~dktaplayanimpo&antrokin
wheze
13. G. Gumhe, liahed.
H.L. Cui, and N.J.M. Horing, unpub-