Mannose-6-P and mannose-1-P in rat brain, kidney and liver

Mannose-6-P and mannose-1-P in rat brain, kidney and liver

Vol. 89, No. 1, 1979 July 12, 1979 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 279-285 MANNOSE-6-P AND MANNOSE-1-P Nur Asiki...

390KB Sizes 3 Downloads 52 Views

Vol.

89,

No.

1, 1979

July

12, 1979

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

Pages 279-285

MANNOSE-6-P AND MANNOSE-1-P Nur Asikin" Oklahoma Oklahoma State Received

IN RAT BRAIN, & Roger

KIDNEY AND LIVER

E. Koeppe

Department of Biochemistry Agricultural Experiment University, Stillwater,

Station Oklahoma

74074

#June 4,1979

Summary The approximate concentrations of mannose-6-phosphate and mannose-l-phosphate in female rat brain, kidney and liver are (Man-6-P), and 13, 12, 15 respectively 51, 29 and 99 nmole/g nmol/g Wan-l-P). Intraperitoneal injection of mannose (20 mmol/kg body weight, 15, 30 or 60 min before sacrifice) raises the liver Man-6-P to 0.4 to 4.3 pmol/g and Man-l-P to 100 to 186 nmol/g. Mannose

injection

of

hypoglycemia

to

normal

has

resulting

the by

results

interpreted

to

glucose

tissues

However,

in

1972,

Sloviter

mannose

can

replace

glucose

rat

brain.

Man-6-P

These jin

isolation erythrocytes

it

converted

lished mammals

in

to

is

is

the

(1)

brains

and of

(2).

(3) substrate

also

determined

the

that

mammals Man-6-P,

Man-l-P,

has

brain.

for

that

perfused

concentration

of

been

its

found

in

(5). formed

a synthetic

not

the

reported

has

evidence

microorganisms,

These

and described

Man-1,6-P2

and various

Man-l-P

(3)

made

converted

by

an energy

(4).

is

utilization

brain

restore

rabbits

mannose

colleagues

rat

symptoms to

injection

as

presumed

limited.

relieve

that to

and

GDP-Man via

certain

evidence prior

tissue

humans

of insulin

and normal

this

of

Although is

authors

perfused from

or as

to

hepatectomy

activity

hepatectomy

by other

shown

from

electrical

hypoglycemic were

been

for

been

from

Fru-6-P,

pathway this

reported

estab-

sequence in

in

animal

"Present address: Dept. University of Indonesia, Journal Article ment Stat.ion.

No.

of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Salemba 6, Jakarta, Indonesia. J-3656 of the Oklahoma Agricultural Experi-

0006-291X/79/130279-07$01.00/0 279

Vol.

89,

No.

tissues, and

PMI+

mammalian

catalyze

the

physiological we report rat

BIOCHEMICAL

1, 1979

tissues,

of

origin

PMM has

not

interconversion role

the

animal

in

this

concentrations with

AND

and without

BIOPHYSICAL

has been

not

been

detected.

of

Man-6-P

reaction of

RESEARCH

mannose

extensively

studied

Although and

remains

Man-6-P

COMMUNICATIONS

and

PGM can

Man-l-P in

(6),

doubt.

Man-l-P

its Herein

in

several

loading.

Methods Materials - Glucose, fructose and perchloric acid were from J. T. Baker; ATP, NADP, hexose-phosphates, mannose and triethanolamine base from Sigma; PM1 from Boehringer, the other enzymes from either Boehringer or Sigma; charcoal (Norit A) from Matheson. All solutions used in fluorometric assays were filtered through a 0.45 p Millipore filter. Preparation of Tissue Extracts - Female Holtzmann rats were used throughout; the sucklings' sex was not determined. Animals were in the laboratory with access to food and water and acclimated to handling for at least two days before being killed; usually at lo-12 A.M. Under mild ether anesthesia, skin above the forehead was removed and the abdominal cavity exposed. The rat was then immersed in liquid nitrogen and desired tissues chiseled from the frozen carcass. When brain was not required, tissues were excised from the anesthetized animal and pressed with a precooled pestle in a mortar filled with liquid nitrogen; a flattened tissue was obtained within 5 set after excision. Mannose was injected intraperitoneally under ether anesthesia, at a dose of 20 mmol/kg body weight given as a 25% solution. The animal was allowed to recover and after an appropriate interval was reanesthetized and killed. After removal of fat and excess blood tissues were put in a steel mortar surrounded verized, transferred to a glass homogenizing ice and weighed.

(without thawing), by dry ice, pultube cooled in dry

Protein-free tissue extracts were prepared according to Williamson and Corkey (7). When Man-l-P was to be determined, neutralization was done with 5M KOH; the use of buffer is a disadvantage here because of the requirement for alkaline and acid hydrolysis. Since some extracts of liver and kidney were yellowish-brown and highly fluorescent, they were decolorized with charcoal (8). Assay of Metabolites - The resence of the NADPH formed (7)

increase in absorbance or was measured. The validity

+Enzyme abbreviations: HK, hexokinase; PGI, phosphoglucose PMI, phosphomannose isomerase; PMM, phosphomannoisomerase; mutase; PGM, phosphoglucomutase; G6PDH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.

280

fluoof

Vol.

89,

No.

‘I, 1979

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

assay was checked with internal mined by addition of metaboljtes reaction:; were as follows:

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

standards and recoveries deterto some tissue samples. The

Glc-1-P

Man-6-P i Man

PM1 ~Fru-6-P

H‘K>

+ Mg++

I

PGI -Glc-6-P ATP

F&l

i Glc

All assays were done at 30° mine buffer, pH 7.6, containing MF$~~, 3 mM; ATP, 500 FM; NADP, (yeast), 1.5 U; PGI (yeast), 1 G6PDH (yeast), 1 IT. Some batches of was added before PM1 give an overestimate tor of PGM, was added

PGM G6PDH -7NADP

6-P-G1cA NADPH

In . 2 ml of 0.1 N triethanolathe following as appropriate: 400 PM; PM1 (yeast), 1.5 U; HK U; PGM (rabbit muscle), 1 U;

PM1 contain PGM activitv, therefore PGM to remove any Glc-1-P present which might of Man-6-P. In this case EDTA, an activaat a final concentration of 0.1 mM.

Glucose was measured by the addition of HK after measurement of Glc-6-P. Addition of PGI gave fructose and Fru-6-P and addition of PMI, mannose and Man-6-P. Free fructose and mannose were then obtained by subtracting the Fru-6-P and Man-6-P readjngs in the absence of HK, from those in its presence, respectively. Determination of Man-l-P - Without PMM, mannose-1-P cannot be assayed enzymatically using the system described above. Therefore three other methods were tried; they gave similar results. Two of them involved enzymatic determination of mannose rel.eased from Man-l-P by enzymatic or acid hydrolysis, after removal of hexoses and their 6-phosphates by 1) enzymatic conversion to 6-P-gluconate or 2) reduction to the corresponding polyols with NaBH4. In ithe method of choice, advantage was taken of the differences in stability towards and acid alkali of hexose-lphosphates and reducing sugars (free hexoses and their 6-phosphates. Hexose-l-phosphates are stable in alkali while acid hydrolysis releases an equivalent amount of phosphate and the respective free sugar. Reducing sugars on the other hand are relatively stable in dilute acid whereas treatment with alkali results in degradation products, among others, phosphate, saccharinic acids and lactate. The reducing sugars were first destroyed by boiling in a water bath for 30 min in 0.05 N KOH. Acid was added, HCl or N, and hydrolysis was achieved by heating in H2S04 > to 0.1 boiling vwater for 20 min. The acid hydrolysate was decolorized with charcoal before neutralization and assay. after

Neither free hexoses nor treatment with alkali.

hexose-6-phosphates were After acid hydrolysis,

281

detected Glc-6-P

Vol.

89,

No.

1, 1979

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

and Man-6-P were detected, presumably due to the presence of the respective 1,6-bisphosphates. Free glucose and mannose, detected after acid hvdrolysis (above), originated from the respective l-phosphates: In standard runs known Man-l-P was quantitatively recovered as mannose. The sequence

of

[Hexose Hexose-1-P Hexose-6-P Hexose-(1,6)--P2 UDP-Glc

events

is:

OH-

1

Hexose-1-P Hexose-(1,6)-P2

a

H+ Hexose -Hexose-6-P A

Addition of amino acids to standard runs did not cause interference. GDP-Man, if present, might contribute to the mannose measured after acid hydrolysis. However, no mannose was detected when a solution of GDP-Man was put through the procedure. Similar treatment of UDP-Glc, which differs from GDP-Man at the hydroxyl group on C2 of the hexose, yielded glucose in the acid hydrolysate. That hexose-1-P is present in an alkaline hydrolysate of a liver extract was verified by separating the sugar phosphates from other intermediates by anion exchange chromatography. Enzymatic analysis showed hexose-6-P to be absent. Hydrolysis of the hexose-P peak gave a ratio of glucose + mannose:P of i 0.8. Results The

results

concerning

the

are

are

not

animals

are

in

are (10).

fact

used

concentrations hence

ranges

and

not

assay 60 vary

the

data.

In normal

female

rats

the

23 nmol/g

* The authors are indebted for supplying the freeze

from

normal

reported

by

several

215

g.

those

of

However,

to

100 Veech

several

brain * others tissue size

of

metabolite animal

size;

of

Man-6-P

concentration

kidney

of

The

with

to Drs. Richard blown brains.

282

blown

satisfactory.

average in

freeze

methodology

substantially

combined

about

obtain

to,

our is

to

we have

from

we

from

in

data

Fru-6-P

comparable that

Considerable

and

those

obtained

but

from

did

with

those

indicates

varied

I.

The values

than,

extraction

Table

Glc-6-P

agreement

(9); lower

This

freezing, animal

good

in of

presented.

laboratories slightly

presented

concentration

tissues

other

and Discussion

nmol/g

in

liver.

and Todd King

Vol.

89,

No.

1, 1979

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

Table

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

1

Concentration (nmol/g) of Mannose, Man-6-P and Man-l-P in Rat Tissue Treatment

Brain __suckling freeze blown normal

f mannose

15 min

30 min 60 min

Man-6-P

Man-l-P

Mannose

41,52 51 * 3 (3)" 21 f 4 (5)

11,14,15

0

85-162

15,28

(4)

58

14

2300-3900 4500 1800

32 29 2 4 (6)

12,lZ

0

14,28

35100,35000

112,195

(3)

Kidney suckling

normal + mannose 15 min 30 min

23,24,44 53,82,107 32

60 min

15100

Liver -suckling norma

48,54 99 -+ 6 (9)

1

+ rnannose 15 min 30 min 60 min

410-2620 790-4310 1010,156O

(5) (4)

15 +- 3 (5)

0

100,134

11000-27500 10600 6900,247OO

186

Blood -control + rnannose 15 min 60

0 5600,120OO 7350

min

-parentheses are the number of observations values or used in calculation of S.E.M.

The

brain

killed brain

Man-6-P in

are

brains*

this

value

hands

the

latter

value

for

Man-6-P

and brains

values

colleagues perfused

need

laboratory

approximately

the

(4)

is

(see

approximately seems rat

When the

Methods)

21 nmol/g.

figure in

comment.

in

However,

brain.

be

the

with

found

considerably

with

either

glucose

283

(Table more

We should

(3)

of

animals

were

Man-6-P

51 nmol/g to

a range

note

more or mannose.

values

for

freeze

blown

I).

In our

nearly

correct

that

Sloviter

Man-6-P

in

rat

The reason

for

Vol.

89,

the

No.

difference

between It

apparent. in

BIOCHEMICAL

1, 1979

brain et

nmol/g)

al.

PM1 reaction 1;

Our

is

the

direction

the

time

the

data presence

concentrations

of

of

lo-15

(Man-l-P

---

(Keq

see

in

+2+ 10,

61,

somewhat

removed

from

However,

because

the

from

equilibrium

Some animals manner

similar wi-th

Treatment little

effect

liver, istration with

mannose

about

1.5

magnitude

the

in animal,

Umol/g

blood changes

resulted of

at

li~ver

of

the

is

Man-l-P. apparent

concentrations

to

it

loading.

concentrations

of

the

fructose

adminLoading

liver. concentration extent

mannose

of

in

brain

administration,

In another,

Man-6-P

60 min

concentration umol /g.

was Although

concentrations

in

did

order

of

not

a

had

of

pmol/g.

in

sacrifice

a lesser

24.7

fructose

mannose

though

in

to

fructose mM,

or

content

about

284

tissues

this

for

shown),

liver

in

the

reaction

limited,

Man-l-P

30 min after

several in

or

mannose

this

prior

exceeded4

and

that

equilibrium

direction

(Methods)

and

administration,

c

for

in

be near

glucose

increase

liver

to

are

Man-l-P

a striking

suggest

Whereas

the

with

not

the

(Keq

rat

brain

fructose

(data

the

be overemphasized.

Man-6-P

brain

one

loading and

or

concentration

mannose

brain

glucose

increase

In

after

fructose

described

Man-6-P

I).

Man-6-P

that

caused

and

(Table the

or

did

Man-l-P

injected

on

kidney

not

were

to

and

data

should

by

brain

report

three

I).

in

Man-l-P

rat

al.

we

seems

equilibrium

reported

in

et

in

(Table

kidney

concentrations

equilibrium

limited,

M-6-P)

immediately

Man-6-P.

Man-l-P

nmol/g

PMM reaction

near

Sloviter of

not

nmol/g

that

is

more

is

COMMUNICATIONS

Fru-6-P

indicate

of

are

ours

12-15

Fru-6-P)

results

in

and

the

data

----

RESEARCH

we found

to

the

Although

shift

that

whereas

reaction

first

(3).

BIOPHYSICAL

values

close

(Man-6-P

see 11)

this

their

may be noted

(19

Sloviter

AND

cause

Fru-6-P

(data

liver, of not

Vol.

89,

No.

shown). of

BIOCHEMICAL

1, 1979

We conclude

mannose,

rapidly

rat

forms

tions trations

liver,

of

of

step

of in

ing to liver been

note

are

several

(Ki

be due which unable

the

in

= 0.46

extent very

liver

high

it

for

brain,

concentrathe

following

Ki

Fru-6-P

rat

Since

the

mM; 121,

concentrations

concenmannose

Man-6-P

as

may be inhibiting

this were

concentrations

an

not

shown).

the

loading to

lesser to

COMMUNICATIONS

large

removal.

fold

although

not

a

to

accumulates

observe

is

mannose

which

to

we

(data

Of

and

RESEARCH

exposed

Man-6-P

glycolysis,

elevated

when

rapid

PGI

a

BIOPHYSICAL

less

administration inhibitor

that

Man-6-P

because

AND

large

increase

(Table

I).

presence

interconverts to detect

in

At

of

PMM in

present

an as yet

Man-6-P rat

Man-l-P this

in

liver

must

undescribed

and Man-l-P.

followbe assumed PMM in

To date

rat

we have

tissues.

References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

a. 9. 10. 11. 12.

Mann, F. C. (1925) Ergebn. der Physiol. 24, 379-384. Maddock, S., Hawkins, J. E., Jr., and Holmes, E. (1939) Am. J. Physiol. 125, 551-565. 11972) J. Gosh, A. K., Mukherji, B., and Sloviter, H. A. Neurochem. 19, 1279-1285. Saraswathi, S., Gosh, A. K., and Sloviter, H. A. (1973) Fed. Proc. 32, 525. Bartlett, G. R. (1968) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 156, 231239. Lowry, (1969) J. Biol. 0. H. annd Passonneau, .J. V. Chem. 244, 910-916. Williamson, J. R., and Corkey, B. E. (1969) Methods Enzymol. m, 434-513. Hurlbert, R. B. (19571 Methods Enzymol. III, 793. Williamson, D. H., and Brosnan, J. T. (19m Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (H. U. Bergmeyer, ed.) vol 4, pp. 2266-2302, Academic Press, New York. Ruderman, N. B., Ross, P. S., Berger, M., and Goodman, M. N. (1974) Biochem. J. 138, l-10. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. Gracy, R. W., and Noltmann, E. A. 243, 5410-5419. Sal'as, M., Vinuela, E., and Sols, A. (1965) J. Biol. Chem. 3, 561-568.

285