Mass exhalation rates, emanation coefficients and enrichment pattern of radon, thoron in various grain size fractions of monazite rich beach placers

Mass exhalation rates, emanation coefficients and enrichment pattern of radon, thoron in various grain size fractions of monazite rich beach placers

Journal Pre-proof Mass exhalation rates, emanation coefficients and enrichment pattern of radon, thoron in various grain size fractions of monazite ri...

713KB Sizes 0 Downloads 12 Views

Journal Pre-proof Mass exhalation rates, emanation coefficients and enrichment pattern of radon, thoron in various grain size fractions of monazite rich beach placers Primal V. Pinto, K. Sudeep Kumara, N. Karunakara PII:

S1350-4487(19)30506-2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2019.106220

Reference:

RM 106220

To appear in:

Radiation Measurements

Received Date: 10 August 2018 Revised Date:

7 September 2019

Accepted Date: 13 November 2019

Please cite this article as: Pinto, P.V., Sudeep Kumara, K., Karunakara, N., Mass exhalation rates, emanation coefficients and enrichment pattern of radon, thoron in various grain size fractions of monazite rich beach placers, Radiation Measurements, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2019.106220. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1

Mass exhalation rates, emanation coefficients and

2

enrichment pattern of radon, thoron in various grain size

3

fractions of monazite rich beach placers

4

Primal V. Pinto1, 3*, Sudeep Kumara K.2 and Karunakara N.2

5 6

¹Science program, Texas A & M University, Qatar

7 8 9

2

Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity (CARER),

Mangalore University, Mangalagangothri – 574199, India

10 11

3

Department of Studies in Physics, Mangalore University, Mangalagangothri-574199,

12

India

13 14

*

15

Corresponding author Email: [email protected] [email protected]

16

17

18

19

20

21 1

22 23 24

Highlights •

to 222Rn and 220Rn release in the environment.

25 26





Radon and thoron emanation coefficient was higher in 1000-500 µm grain size fractions, which contained least 226Ra and 228Ra activity (Bq kg-1).

29 30

Monazite rich samples have low emantion coefficient and are not the highest contributor of 222Rn and 220Rn to the environment.

27 28

This study throws light on the relative contribution of the monazite minerals



Unlike

226

Ra and

228

Ra activity concentrations,

222

Rn and

220

Rn emanation

31

coefficient did not increase with the finer grain size; rather, opposite trend was

32

observed.

33



The

statistically

significant

correlation

coefficient

34

dependency of 220Rn mass exhalation rate (Bq kg-1 h-1) and

35

kg-1), also between

36

activity (Bq kg-1).

222

substantiated 228

Ra activity (Bq

Rn mass exhalation rate (mBq kg-1 h-1) and

37 38

39

40

41

2

the

226

Ra

42

Abstract

43

A study on exhalation rates of

44

different grain size fractions was carried out. Four different size fractions of the sand

45

samples (1000-500 µm, 500-250 µm, 250-125 µm, and <125 µm) collected from the

46

beach placers of south west coast of India were analyzed for 226Ra and

47

concentrations

48

measurement technique using Scintillation cell based monitors were used to measure

49

the

50

appropriate model to extract the mass exhalation and emanation coefficients. The

51

222

222

Rn and

(Bq

220

kg-1)

222

Rn and

by gamma

220

Rn and their enrichment pattern in

spectrometry.

232

Automated

Th activity continuous

Rn concentrations. These measured values were then fitted to

Rn mass exhalation rate varied from 0.7 ± 0.2 mBq kg-1 h-1 to 11.0 ± 0.9 mBq kg-1

52

h-1 while that of 220Rn varied from 88.5 ± 4.8 Bq kg-1 h-1 to 3066 ± 14 Bq kg-1 h-1. The

53

higher mass exhalation rates, for both radioactive gases, were observed in finer grain

54

size fractions. However, this was in contrast to the emanation coefficient values.

55

Interestingly, higher radioactive monazite rich beach samples exhibited low

56

emanation coefficient values when compared to the low radioactive soil and sand

57

samples reported in the literature. Statistical analysis showed positive correlation,

58

with correlation coefficient R=0.84 and R=0.79 respectively between mass exhalation

59

rates of

60

size fractions.

222

Rn,

220

Rn with their respective radioactive predecessor for different grain

3

222

Rn and

220

61

Keywords:

Rn, emanation coefficient, mass exhalation, monazite, High

62

Background Radiation Area (HBRA).

63 64

1. Introduction

65

The beach placers deposits along the south-west coast of India are particularly rich in

66

monazite. It is radioactive due to the presence of naturally occurring Thorium and

67

Uranium (Mohanty et al., 2003; Shetty and Narayana, 2007). As a daughter product

68

of Uranium, the release of

69

of emanation followed by exhalation. The emanation can be defined as the escape of

70

a

71

mechanism of emanation and transport of 222Rn and

72

effect of the short half-life (55.6s) of 220Rn (Kanse et al., 2013).

222

Rn atom from a

222

Rn gas to the environment takes place by the processes

226

Ra-bearing grain into pore spaces (Sakoda et al., 2011). The 220

Rn is the same, except for the

73

222

74

The phenomenon of

75

parameters such as grain size, porosity and water content. These determine the static

76

emanation coefficient which does not change with time, so the type of soil determines

77

the general

78

controls 222Rn exhalation rate showed that the emanation fractions first decreases and

79

later reaches a constant value with the increase in grain size (Sakoda et al., 2011;

80

Barillon et al., 2005). The typical values reported for the radon emanation coefficient

222

Rn emanation and then exhalation depends on several

Rn level in the soil (Chauhan, 2011). The effect of grain size that

4

81

for dry soil is 0.1 (range 0.01- 0.5) and building material is 0.05 (ranges 0.005-0.3)

82

(Porstendorfer, 1991). A representative value of 0.2 is suggested in UNSCEAR

83

(1988) for the soil with the range 0.01-0.8. The 222Rn mass exhalation rate of 24 ± 12

84

mBq kg−1 h−1 reported in soil samples and 18.8 ± 6.4 mBq kg−1 h−1 for the black sand

85

(Sahoo et al., (2007).

86

87

Radium-226, a source of 222Rn present in rocks, soils and construction materials leads

88

to the accumulation of

89

(Galan Lopez et al., 2004). Nevertheless,

90

can easily enter into the ground water by the effect of lithostatic pressure, easily get

91

released to indoor air when used in showers, humidifiers, cooking and so on.

92

Exposure to water borne

93

222

222

Rn in poorly ventilated houses, pose potential health risk

222

222

Rn from the bedrocks containing

226

Ra

Rn may occur by ingestion (drinking water containing

Rn) and by inhalation (Toscani et al., 2001; Mahesh et. al., 2001; Primal et al., 222

94

2012). The exhalation rate of

95

sands, rocks, construction materials, uranium ores and tailings have been the subject

96

of several studies (Somashekarappa et al., 1996; Jha et al., 2000; Evangelista and

97

Pereira et al., 2002; El-Amri et al., 2003). Such studies are used to assess the

98

radiation dose to the public and to estimate local environmental

99

exhalation rate of 222Rn is one of the critical factors that influence indoor and outdoor

100

222

Rn from numerous sources such as soils, mineral

Rn concentrations (Karunakara et al., 2005b; Mayya, 2004).

5

222

Rn levels. The

101 222

Unlike

103

reported, and these are; Ganesh et al. (2008) for India, Kovacs (2010) for Hungary,

104

Harley et al. (2010) for the USA and Yasuoka et al. (2010) for Japan. Thoron

105

exhalation rates of 1.7 ± 1.2 (range 0.19–4.2 Bq m-2 s-1) and 2.4 ± 1.5 (range 0.04–6.2

106

Bq m-2 s-1) were reported for the red and yellow soil surface and the Dark red soil,

107

respectively (Hosoda et al., 2010). The 220Rn level in the environment is governed by

108

its emanation from the soil or building materials containing 232Th (Kanse et al., 2016;

109

Shimo et al., 2010; Shiroma et al., 2010). Jonas et al., (2016) have reported that the

110

220

Rn, a very few studies on

220

102

Rn in the living environments have been

Rn emanation factor could not be predicted from the 222Rn emanation factor.

111 112

Wastes and tailings from Thorium bearing ores processed for metals can potentially

113

release significant

114

shale are likely to have high Thorium content. Monazite and zircon sands have an

115

extraordinarily high concentration of Thorium. Thorium is widely distributed in

116

nature with an average concentration of 10 ppm in the earth’s crust in many

117

phosphates, silicates, carbonates and oxide minerals (Ramachandran, 2010). In

118

general, Thorium occurs in association with Uranium and Rare Earth Element (REE)

119

in diverse rock types. In India, the High natural Background Radiation Areas (HBRA)

120

are identified at certain regions of coastal Kerala and Orissa due to an elevated

121

content in monazite sands (Mishra, 1993; Nambi et al., 1994; Primal and Narayana,

220

Rn (Polednak et al., 1983). Rocks composed of granite or black

6

232

Th

122

2014). Southern coast of Brazil and China are among the other numerous locations,

123

known for high levels natural radiation (Paschoa, 2000; Wei and Sugahara, 2000; Tao

124

et al., 2012). Because of their high density, monazite minerals get concentrated in

125

sands along the coastal regions.

126 127 128

The exhalation being an essential parameter for describing the potential 220

222

Rn and

Rn release from a solid matrix, in particular in HBRA. Hence, a detailed study on

129

these aspects were carried out in the samples collected from the HBRA of the

130

coastline of Kerala such as Karunagapalli, Chavara, Neendakara, and Kovalam (Fig.

131

1). This study is an effort to evaluate the contribution of monazite rich sand to the

132

elevated levels of

133

emanation coefficient and the effect of grain size on the release of

134

from the solid matrix to the surroundings. The study area has a significant resident

135

population exposed to higher levels of

136

Ramachandran and Sahoo, 2009; Mayya et al., 2012).

226

Ra and

228

Ra concentrations,

222

Rn and

220

Rn exhalation,

222

Rn and

220

Rn

220

Rn (Chougaonkar et al., 2004;

137

138

2. Materials and methods

139

Sand samples were collected from the HBRA beach placers were oven dried at 110ºC

140

till the constant dry weight was obtained. The dried samples were sieved into four

141

different grain size fractions; viz. 1000-500 µm, 500-250 µm, 250-125 µm, and <125

142

µm. The sieved samples were subjected to gamma spectrometry (section 2.1) to 7

226

Ra and

232

143

determine

Th activity concentrations. The methods adopted for the

144

exhalation measurements are discussed in sections 2.2 and 2.3.

145

146

2.1 Gamma-ray spectrometry

147

The samples were counted using a high-resolution, co-axial n-type high purity HPGe

148

detector (model GR 4021 Canberra USA) with 42% relative efficiency. This facility

149

was available at Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity

150

(CARER), Mangalore University. The efficiency calibration of the detector was

151

performed using IAEA quality assurance reference materials: RG U-238, RG Th-232,

152

RG K-1, and SOIL-6. The samples were taken in 300 ml air tight polypropylene box.

153

The standard materials and samples were taken in containers of the same size and

154

type so that the detection geometry remained the same. The samples of different grain

155

sizes were counted long enough (30,000 s) to reduce the counting error. The activity

156

concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in various samples were determined using the

157

Gennie-2000 spectrum analyses software. The activity of 40K was evaluated from the

158

1461 keV photopeak, the activity of 226Ra from the weighted mean of the activities of

159

three photopeaks of

160

determined from the photopeaks of

161

background counts and applying the compton correction (Karunakara et al., 2005a,

162

Karunakara et al., 2013, Karunakara et al., 2014a, Yashodhara et al., 2011). The

214

Bi (609.3, 1120.4, and 1764.5 keV), and that of 228

8

228

Ra was

Ac (911.2 keV) after subtracting the

163

Minimum Detection Levels (MDL) for the gamma spectrometry system used in the

164

present study were 0.9, 1.2, and 4.06 Bq kg-1 for 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K respectively at

165

95% confidence level.

166

167

2.2. Radon exhalation measurement

168

Mass exhalation rate measurement requires continuous online

169

this was performed using a Scintillation Radon Monitor (SRM) developed by

170

Radiological Physics and Advisory Division (RP & AD), Bhabha Atomic Research

171

Centre (BARC). It is an integrated microprocessor-based system consisting of a

172

collection chamber, a conventional ZnS:Ag scintillator detector and a counting set up.

173

The SRM records

174

temperature and humidity values. In the present study it was operated in 60 min cycle.

175

Experiments were carried in an air-conditioned room so that a uniform ambient

176

temperature and humidity condition is maintained for all the measurements. In order

177

to obtain the results under a unified experimental conditions, all the samples were

178

dried at 1100C to obtain a constant weight and the dried samples were used for

179

measurements.

222

222

Rn monitoring and

Rn concentration for each measurement along with ambient

180 181

A known quantity of dried sample was taken in a leak proof container having inlet

182

and outlet valves. The outlet of container was connected to the inlet of the SRM

9

183

through an air pump. The outlet of the SRM was connected to the inlet of the sample

184

container. A pump was used to circulate the air between sample container volume and

185

detector. The SRM monitor consists of a “progeny filter” and “thoron discriminator”

186

to eliminate

187

progeny formed inside the cell were continuously counted (60 mins cycle) and are

188

converted to

189

smart algorithm. Since the technology is purely based on direct scintillation counting

190

of an alpha particle with build-up/decay corrections achieved through software, the

191

measurements were not affected by humidity or trace gases (Sahoo et al., 2007;

192

Gaware et al., 2011). The

193

a saturation value. The SRM has a sensitivity factor of 1.2 counts h-1/Bq m-3 and an

194

upper detection limit of 50 MBq m-3. The minimum detection limit of SRM is 14

195

Bq/m3 at 95% confidence with 1 hr counting. Fig. 2 shows the arrangements for the

196

222

222

Rn progenies and

222

220

Rn. The alpha scintillations from

222

Rn and its

Rn activity concentration (Bqm-3) by an inbuilt microcontroller based

222

Rn growth was monitored till the concentration attained

Rn mass exhalation measurement using SRM. 222

197

The measured

Rn concentration, C(t), at time t is fitted to appropriate model to

198

extract the 222Rn exhalation from the sample as under (Sahoo et al., 2007),

C (t ) =

199

[

]

JmM 1 − e − λ e t + C 0 e − λ e t …. (1) V λe

200

where,

201

C0 is the 222Rn concentration (Bq m-3) in the chamber volume at t = 0,

10

202

M is the total mass of the dry sample (kg),

203

Jm is the mass exhalation rate (Bq kg-1 h-1),

204

V is the effective volume (m3) (i.e. volume of the container + volume of the

205

scintillation cell of the monitor -volume occupied by the sample),

206

λe is the effective decay constant for

222

Rn, which is the sum of the leak rate (if 222

Rn (h-1). It must be noted that

207

existing) and the radioactive decay constant of

208

current method automatically takes care of the leaks present in the system by

209

considering an effective leak rate constant.

210

t is the measurement time (h), and the Jm mass exhalation was determined from

211

equation 1.

212

213

2.3. Thoron exhalation measurement

214

The thoron monitor consists of two Scintillation Cells (Lucas cells) which are coupled

215

to separate photomultiplier tubes and associated pulse preamplifier and scalar. When

216

this monitor is operated in “thoron measurement mode” it excludes 222Rn interference

217

in the measurements. The detector has a sensitivity of 0.8 counts h-1/Bq m-3, minimum

218

detection limit of 15 Bq m-3, and can be used to measure concentration upto 100,000

219

Bq m-3 at 95 % confidence level. The

220

in Fig. 3 and it consists of air tight sample holder connected to a pump in a closed

221

loop. The uniformity of

220

Rn exhalation measurement setup is shown

220

Rn concentration was achieved by forced air mixing 11

222

through the external pump. The

223

state concentration of

224

al., 2011),

220

Rn exhalation was determined from the steady-

220

Rn inside chamber using the following equation (Gaware et

CT=Jm.M /V λT …..(2)

225 226

where,

227

CT is steady-state concentration of 220Rn in chamber (Bq m-3),

228

Jm is the mass exhalation (Bq kg-1 h-1),

229

V is effective volume (volume of sample chamber + volume of scintillation cell)

230

(m3),

231

M is the mass of the sample (kg), and

232

λT is radioactive decay constant for 220Rn (45.36 h-1).

233

The 220Rn leak rate effect is negligible when compared to radioactive decay and hence

234

λT overwhelmingly considered as the effective decay constant for the system.

235 236

2.4. Calibration and quality assurance

237 222

Rn and

220

238

The performance evaluation of the

239

frequent inter-comparison exercise was carried out at Radiological Physics and

240

Advisory division, BARC under controlled conditions in a chamber. Experiments

241

were also performed to compare the measurements of Scintillation Radon Monitors

242

against the commercially available system AlphaGuard. A fair agreement was seen

243

between, SRM and AlphaGuard (Karunakara et al., 2014b, Sudeep et al., 2012, 12

Rn monitors used in this study and

244

Sudeep et al., 2014). Similarly, in the case of thoron monitors, the measurement

245

results were validated by comparing them with those obtained using RAD-7

246

(manufactured by Durridge) monitor, which was calibrated by the manufacturer

247

against a primary standard. The 220Rn monitor was tested upto a concentration 2 MBq

248

m-3, the variations were within 3%. Regular performance evaluation and frequent

249

inter-comparison exercise were carried out to maintain the quality of the

250

measurements.

251 252

Several measurements were carried out to establish a reliable value for the instrument

253

background. The

254

300 min), in 60 min cycles before starting each experiment. The average background

255

value of

256

220

222

222

Rn monitor background was measured for a long duration (upto

Rn concentration was observed to be 10.9 ± 2.8 Bq m-3. In the case of

Rn monitor, the instrument background was measured for 240 min, in cycles of 15

257

min, and the average background value of

258

be 10.2 ± 4.3 Bq m-3.

220

Rn concentration was observed to

259 260

2.5. Radon and Thoron emanation coefficient

261

The emanation coefficient (f) or the release of

262

calculated as (Sahoo et al., 2007),

263 264 265

where,

222

f=Jm/Qλ ……(3)

13

Rn and

220

Rn from the grains is

266

Jm is the mass exhalation,

267

Q is the 226Ra content (Bq kg-1) and

268

λ is the decay constant of 222Rn (h-1) (Sakoda et al., 2010; Kanse et al., 2016).

269 270

3. Results and discussion

271

3.1. Radon exhalation rate

272

The

273

Neendakara, and Kovalam for different grain size fractions are shown in Fig. 4-7. The

274

influence of the grain size on

275

concentration was lowest in 1000 µm and increased in the subsequent grain size

276

fractions of 500- 250 µm, 250-125 µm, and <125 µm respectively. The highest

277

concentration upto 957 ± 11 Bq m-3 was obtained in <125 µm grains of Chavara

278

samples. The

279

sampling stations are listed in the Table 1. Although, there were variations in mass

280

exhalation values among different sampling stations, a similar trend was observed in

281

the concentration of 222Rn with respect to the grain size fractions.

222

Rn build-up curve observed in the sand of Karunagapalli, Chavara,

222

222

Rn concentration was very significant. The

222

Rn

Rn mass exhalation rates for the sample collected from all four

282 283

Grain sizes of <125 µm showed higher 222Rn mass exhalation rates ranging from 4.8

284

± 1.3 to 11.0 ± 0.9 mBq kg-1 h-1, whereas, 1000-500 µm had the lowest values,

285

ranging from 0.7 ± 0.2 to 1.9 ± 0.1 mBq kg-1 h-1 (Table 1). The

286

1000-500 µm grain sizes (ranging from 9.3 ± 0.8 to 51.8 ± 1.8 Bq kg-1) when

14

226

Ra was lower in

287

compared to the other smaller grain sizes. The 1000-500 µm grain sizes are mostly

288

the quartz, the largest component of the sand, and that it is originally not radioactive

289

(Sakoda et al., 2010). The higher

290

< 125 µm grain is because of its larger specific surface area and hence acquire more

291

radium ions by adsorption during the weathering process. The decrease of

292

subsequent fractions indicates the selective enrichment of radioactive monazite

293

minerals in the grain sizes (Primal et al., 2014). Correlation between

294

exhalation rate (mBq kg-1 h-1) and the

295

significant correlation was observed between

296

correlation coefficient of R= 0.84.

226

Ra (2395 ± 10 Bq kg-1 to 6923 ± 24 Bq kg-1) in

226

226

Ra in

222

Rn mass

Ra activity (Bq kg-1) was studied. A 222

Rn and

226

Ra concentration with a

297 298

Even though 226Ra content in the samples was much higher than world average value

299

of 45 Bq kg-1 (UNSCEAR, 2000). However, the

300

(Table 1) were found to be low for all the grain sizes when compared to the

301

representative value of 0.13 (range 0.00-0.40) for rock, 0.20 (range 0.00-0.80) for soil

302

and 0.03 (range 0.00-0.25) for minerals (Sakoda et al., 2011). This can be explained

303

based on the single grain model which was developed assuming uniform distribution

304

of

226

222

Rn significantly (Morawska and Philip, 1993; Sakoda et al., 2011). Moreover, the

305

222

Rn emanation coefficient values

Ra in the grain. According to this model grains size >10 µm do not emanate

306

low emanation fraction may be due to the short alpha recoil range of

307

The

222

Rn recoil range in sand is ~35 nm (Semkow, 1990). The 15

222

Rn in solids.

222

Rn atom gets

308

trapped inside the grain itself in large grain sizes, and are unavailable for release

309

unless internal surface area is developed due to chemical erosion, weathering or

310

intensive fracturing on a microscopic pathways created by radiation damage (Garver

311

and Baskaran, 2004). The grain sizes analysed in this study are much larger than the

312

alpha recoil from the decay of

313

outer 20 nm of a grain, implying that on a spherical grain of <40 nm diameter all the

314

222

226

Ra resulting in the direct release of

222

Rn from the

Rn will escape the mineral grain (Kigoshi, 1971).

315 316

Nevertheless, its been reported by Bossew, (2003) that 222Rn emanation in wet soil is

317

twice high than that for the dry soil and the

318

migrate out of the sample if the pore space is filled with water. The lower value of

319

emanation coefficient is also possibly due to the negligible moisture content in the

320

sand as the samples were oven dried before the analysis. Some of the reported values

321

on low

322

dry monazite samples of grain sizes between 100-200 µm and with

323

concentration of (223 ± 11)×102 Bq kg-1 , exhibited emanation fraction as low as

324

3.0×10-4 (Rama and Moore, 1984). Another study reported by Garver et al., (2004)

325

showed a emanation fraction of 5.3 ×10-3 for Uraninite samples with

326

concentration as high as (5829 ± 69)× 103 Bq kg-1.

222

Rn emanation for a high values on

327

16

222

Rn atom has a greater probabilty to

226

Ra are listed in Table 2. A study on 226

Ra activity

226

Ra

222

328

The interesting finding of this study is that the

329

increase with the decrease in grain size, rather it was higher in 1000-500 µm grains.

330

Therefore it appears that

331

predominantly quartz. However, the 226Ra content in this grain size was lower when

332

compared to the smaller grain size fractions and therefore it is not the highest

333

contributor of the 222Rn in the environment.

222

Rn emanation coefficient did not

Rn gets released better in 1000-500 µm, which are

334

335

3.2. Thoron exhalation rate

336

The

337

228

220

Rn is a daughter product of

228

Ra, the analysed samples showed very high

Ra activity (Table 3). The 220Rn concentration (Bq m-3) in four different grain size

338

fractions in samples from Karunagapalli, Chavara, Neendakara, and Kovalam are

339

shown in Fig. 8-11. It followed the similar trend as that of

340

m-3), i e., higher

341

subsequent grain fractions. The

342

equation 2 to get the mass exhalation rate (Bq kg-1h-1). Correlation between

343

mass exhalation rate (mBq kg-1 h-1) and the

344

this yielded a positively significant correlation coefficient of R= 0.79.

220

222

Rn concentration (Bq

Rn concentration (Bq m-3) in finer grain size and lower values in 220

Rn concentration (Bq m-3) values were fitted into

228

220

Rn

Ra activity (Bq kg-1) was studied and

345

346

The 220Rn mass exhalation (Bq kg-1h-1) and emanation coefficient are listed in table 3.

347

The mass exhalation was higher in Chavara samples when compared to other 17

348

locations. It is interesting to note that 220Rn emanation was increasing with increasing

349

grain sizes. In spite of

350

emanation coefficient is slightly higher when compared to that of

351

important to recollect the fact that emanation depends not only on grain size but also

352

solid density, fractal nature, etc. (Skoda et al., 2011). Apart from this, the distribution

353

of 228Ra and 226Ra in grains most likely to be inhomogeneous and it may not possible

354

to predict the

355 356

220

222

Rn and

220

Rn having similar recoil energies, the

220

Rn emanation coefficient from that of

222

222

220

Rn

Rn. It is

Rn. A very few reports on

Rn emanation coefficients are available in the literature though. The reported value

in beach placer samples varied from 4.0×10-4–3.9×10-2 (Kanse et al., 2016).

357 358

4. Conclusions

359

This study has evaluated the relative contribution of the monazite minerals to

360

and 220Rn release in the environment. The 222Rn and 220Rn mass exhalation (mBq kg-1

361

h-1) measurements have helped to understand the enrichment pattern in finer and

362

subsequent grain size fractions. The emanation coefficients of

363

increased from finer grain size to larger grains (1000-500 µm), perhaps due to the

364

better ability of the quartz to release these gases although these 1000-500 µm grain

365

sizes had lower

366

The lower values of emanation coeffients, when compared to the soil and sand

367

samples of normal background radiation areas, can be attributed to the lower recoil

368

range of these atoms. Most importantly, inspite of

226

Ra and

222

Rn and

222

Rn

220

Rn

228

Ra content when compared to the smaller grain sizes.

18

228

Ra activity in monazite placer

369

deposit being exceptionally higher the emanation coefficient is much smaller. The

370

statistically significant correlation coefficient substantiated the dependency of

371

on 228Ra and 222Rn on 226Ra

372

Acknowledgment

373

The authors are thankful to the Radiological Physics and Advisory Division (RP &

374

AD), Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, India for providing the training and resources.

375

One of the authors is grateful to the University Grant Commission (UGC)

376

Government of India for providing the financial support (RFSMS).

377

REFERENCES

220

Rn

378 379

Barillon, R., Ozgumus A., Chambaudet, A., 2005. Direct recoil radon emanation from

380

crystalline phases. Influence of moisture content. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

381

69, 2735–2744.

382 383 384 385

Bossew, P., 2003. The radon emanation power of building materials, soils and rocks. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 59, 389–392. Chauhan, R.P., 2011. Radon exhalation rates from stone and soil samples of Aravali hills in India. Iran. J. Radiat. Res. 9 (1), 57-61.

386

Chougaonkar, M.P., Eappen, K.P., Ramachandran, T.V., Shetty, P.G., Mayya, Y.S.,

387

Sadasivan S., Venkat, R., 2004. Profiles of doses to the population living in

19

388

the high background radiation areas in Kerala. Indian. J. Environ Radioact.

389

71(3), 275–297.

390

El-Amri, E.A., Al-Jarallah, M., Abu-Jarad, F., Fazal-ur- Rehman., 2003. Uniformity

391

in radon exhalation from construction materials using can technique. Radiat.

392

Meas. 36 (1-6), 453-456.

393 394 395 396

Evangelista, H., Pereira, E.B., 2002. Radon flux at King George Island, Antarctic Peninsula. J. Environ. Radioact. 61, 283-304. Galan Lopez. M., Martin A., Sanchez, Omez, Escobar, V.G., 2004. Estimates of the dose due to 222Rn concentrations in water. Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 111, 3–7.

397

Ganesh, P., Yogesh, P., Gusain, G.S., Ramola, R.C., 2008. Measurement of radon and

398

thoron levels in soil, water and indoor atmosphere of Budhakedar in Garhwal

399

Himalaya, India. Radiat. Meas. 43, 375–379.

400

Garver, E., Baskaran, M., 2004. Effects of heating on the emanation rates of radon-

401

222 from a suite of natural minerals. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 61, 1477–1485.

402

Gaware, J.J., Sahoo, B.K., Sapra, B.K., Mayya, Y.S., 2011. Development of Online

403

Radon and Thoron Monitoring Systems for Occupational and General

404

Environments. BARC newsletter, 318.

405

Harley, N., Chittaporn, P., Medora, R., Merrill, R., 2010. Measurement of the indoor 220

406

and outdoor

Rn (Thoron) equilibrium factor: application to lung dose.

407

Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 141, 357–362.

20

408

Hosoda, M., Tokonami, S., Sorimachi, A., Ishikawa, T., Sahoo, S. K., Furukawa, M.,

409

Shiroma, Y., Yasuoka, Y., Janik, M., Kavasi, N., Uchida S., and Shimo, M.,

410

2010. Influence of soil environmental parameters on thoron exhalation rate.

411

Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 141(4), 420–423.

412 413

Jha, S., Khan, A.H., Mishra, U.C., 2000. A study of

222

Rn flux from soil in the U

mineralized belt at Jaduguda. J. Environ. Radioact. 49, 157–169.

414

Jonas, J., Zoltan, S., Janja, V., Erika, K., Jonas, S., Tibor K., 2016. Thoron emanation

415

and exhalation of Slovenian soils determined by a PIC detector-equipped

416

radon monitor. Nukleonika. 61(3), 379-384.

417

Kanse, S.D., Sahoo, B.K., Gaware, J.J., Prajith,Sapra B.K., 2016. A study of thoron

418

exhalation from monazite-rich beach sands of high background radiation areas

419

of Kerala and Odisha, India. Environ. Earth. Sci. 75, 1465.

420

Kanse, S.D., Sahoo, B.K., Sapra, B.K., Gaware, J.J., Mayya, Y.S., 2013. Powder

421

sandwich technique: a novel method for determining the thoron emanation

422

potential of powders bearing high 224Ra content. Radiat. Meas. 48, 82–87.

423

Karunakara, N., Chetan, R., Ujwal, P.,Yashodhara, I., Sudeep, Kumara, K., Ravi,

424

P.V., 2013. Soil to rice transfer factors for 226Ra, 228Ra, 210Pb, 40K and 137Cs: a

425

study on rice grown in India. J. Environ. Radioact. 118, 80-92.

426 427

Karunakara, N., Somashekarappa, H.M. Siddappa, K., 2005a. Natural radioactivity in South West Coast of India. Int. Congr. Ser. 1276, 346-347.

21

428

Karunakara, N., Somashekharappa, H.M., Rajashekara K.M., Siddappa, K., 2005b.

429

Indoor and outdoor radon level and their diurnal variations in the environs of

430

south west coast of India. Atmospheric radon levels and its emanation rate in

431

the environment of Kaiga. Int. Congr. Ser. 1276, 341-343.

432

Karunakara, N., Yashodhara, I., Sudeep, Kumara, K., Tripathi, R.M., Menon, S.N.,

433

Kadam, S., Chougaonkar, M.P., 2014a. Assessment of ambient gamma dose

434

rate around a prospective Uranium mining area of south India–A comparative

435

study of dose by direct methods and soil radioactivity measurements. Results

436

in Phys. 4, 20-27.

437

Karunakara, N., Sudeep, Kumara, K., Yashodhara, I., Sahoo, B.K., Gaware, J.J.,

438

Sapra, B.K., Mayya, Y.S., 2014b. Evaluation of radon adsorption

439

characteristics of a coconut shell-based activated charcoal system for radon

440

and thoron removal applications. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 142,

441

77-79.

442 443 444 445 446

Kigoshi, K., 1971. Alpha-recoil thorium-234: dissolution into water and the uranium234/uranium-238 disequilibrium in nature. Science 173, 47–48. Kovacs, T., 2010. Thoron measurements in Hungary. Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 141-4, 328–334. Mahesh, H.M., Avadhani, D.N., Karunakara, N., Someshakarappa, H.M., Narayana, 222

447

Y., Siddappa K., 2001.

Rn concentration in ground water of coastal

448

Karnataka and Kaiga of south west coast of India. Heath Phys. 81, 724-8. 22

449 450

Mayya, Y.S., 2004. Theory of radon exhalation into accumulators placed at the soilatmosphere interface. Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 3, 305–308.

451

Mayya, Y.S., Mishra, R., Prajith, R., Gole, A.C., Sapra, B.K., Chougaonkar, M.P.,

452

Nair, R.R.K., Ramola, R.C., Karunakara, N, Koya P.K.M., 2012. Deposition-

453

based passive monitors for assigning radon, thoron inhalation doses or

454

epidemiological studies. Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 152(1–3), 18–24.

455

Mishra, U.C., 1993. Exposure due to the high natural radiation background and

456

radioactive springs around the world. In: Proceedings of the International

457

Conference on High level Natural Radiation Areas. Ramsar, Iran, 1990, IAEA

458

Publication Series, IAEA Vienna.

459

Mohanty, A.K., Das, S.K., Vijayan, V., Sengupta, D., Saha, S.K., 2003. The

460

geochemical studies of monazite sands of Chatrapur beach placer deposit of

461

Orissa, India by PIXE and EDXRF method. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys.

462

Res. B. 211, 145–154.

463

Morawska, L., Phillips, C.R., 1993. Dependence of the radon emanation coefficient

464

on radium distribution and internal structure of the material. Geochim.

465

Cosmochim. Acta 57, 1783–1797.

466

Nambi, K.S.V., Mehta, N.K., Muraleedharan T.S., Mayya, Y.S., Saha S.C., 1994. A

467

review of the studies on the high background radiation areas of the world. In:

468

Proc. 3rd National Symposium on Environment with special emphasis on high

469

background radiation areas, Thiruvananthapuram. 23

470 471 472 473

Paschoa, A.S., 2000. More than forty years of studies of natural radioactivity in Brazil. Technology 7, 341-352. Polednak, A.P., Stehney, A.F., Lucas, H.F., 1983. Mortality among male workers at a thorium processing plant. Health Phys.14, 239.

474

Porstendorfer, J., 1991. Properties and behaviour of radon and thoron and their decay

475

products in the air. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the

476

Natural Radiation Environment (NRE V).

477

Primal, D., Narayana, Y., Karunakara, N., Yashodhara, I., Sudeep, K., 2012. 222

478

Concentration of

Rn in Drinking Water along Coastal Kerala and

479

Evaluation of Ingestion Doses. Radiat. Prot. Environ.4 (3), 152-216.

480

Primal, P., Narayana, Y., 2014. Studies on the seasonal variation and vertical profiles

481

of natural radionuclides in high background radiation areas of Kerala on the

482

south west coast of India. J.Radioanal.Nucl. Chem. 302, 813–817.

483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490

Rama., Moore, W.S., 1984. Mechanism of transport of U–Th series radioisotopes from solids into ground water. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 395–399. Rama., Moore, W.S., 1990. Micro-crystallinity in radioactive minerals. Nucl. Geophys. 4, 475–478. Ramachandran, T.V., 2010. Environmental thoron (220Rn): A review.Iran. J. Radiat. Res. 8(3), 129-147. Ramachandran, T.V., Sahoo, B.K., 2009. Thoron (220Rn) in the indoor environment and work places. Indian J. Phys. 83(8), 1079–1098. 24

491

Sahoo, B.K., Nathwani, D., Eappen, K.P., Ramachandran, T.V., Gaware, J.J., Mayya,

492

Y.S., 2007. Estimation of radon emanation factor in Indian building materials.

493

Rad. Meas. 42, 1422-1425.

494

Sakoda, A., Ishimori, Y., Yamaoka, K., 2011. A comprehensive review of radon

495

emanation measurements for mineral, rock, soil, mill tailing and fly ash. Appl.

496

Radiat. Isot. 69, 1422–1435.

497

Sakoda, A., Nishiyama, Y., Hanamoto, K., Ishimori, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Kataoka, T.,

498

Kawabe, A., Yamaoka, K., 2010. Differences of natural radioactivity and

499

radon emanation fraction among constituent minerals of rock or soil. Appl.

500

Radiat. Isot. 68, 1180–1184.

501 502

Semkow, T.M., 1990. Recoil-emanation theory applied to radon release from mineral grains. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 54, 425.

503

Shetty, P.K., Narayana, Y., 2007. Radioactivity and radiation hazard evaluation in the

504

environment of coastal Kerala, India. International J. Low Radiat.4 (3), 189–

505

199.

506 507

Shimo, M., Ishimori, Y., Hosoda, M., Tokonami. S., 2010. Thoron exhalation rates in areas of Japan. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 141(4), 473–476.

508

Shiroma, Y., Isa, N., Hosoda, M., Sorimachi, A., Ishikawa, T., Tokonami, S.,

509

Furukawa, M., 2010. In-situ measurements of thoron exhalation rate in

510

Okinawa, Japan. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 141(4), 457–461.

25

511

Somashekharappa, H.M., Narayana, Y., Radhakrishna, A.P., Siddappa, K., Joshi,

512

V.B., Kholekar, R.V., Bhagwat, A.M., 1996. Atmospheric radon levels and its

513

emanation rate in the environment of Kaiga. Radiat. Meas. 26, 35–41.

514

Sudeep, Kumara, K., Karunakara, N., Yashodhara, I., Sapra, B.K., Sahoo, B.K.,

515

Gaware, J.J., Kanse, S.D., Mayya, Y.S., 2014. Effect of humidity on thoron

516

adsorption in activated charcoal bed. J. Radiat. Prot. Environ. 37 (2), 77-79.

517

Sudeep, Kumara, K., Yashodhara, I., Karunakara, N., Mayya, Y.S., Sapra, B.K.,

518

Sahoo, B.K., Gaware, J.J., Kanse, S.D., 2012. Studies on radon and thoron

519

Mitigation using Charcoal based systems. 19th National Symposium on

520

Radiation Physics. 544-546.

521

Tao, Z., Akiba, S., Zha, Y., Sun, Q., Zou, J., Li, J., Liu, Y., Kato, H., Yuan, Y.,

522

Tokonami, S., Morishoma, H., Koga, T., Nakamura, S., Sugahara, T., Wei, L.,

523

2012. Cancer and non-cancer mortality among inhabitants in the high

524

background radiation area of Yangjiang, China (1979-1998). Health Phys. 102

525

(2), 173-181.

526

Toscani, L., Martinelli, G., Dalledonne, C., Gadidolfi., Oratalli, I., Sogni,R., Vaccari,

527

S. and Venturelli, G., 2001

Radon in underground waters of Northern

528

Apennines as determined by four different analytical methods. Proc. 5th Int.

529

conf. on rare gas geochemistry, Hungary. 321-328.

26

530

UNSCEAR, 1988. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic

531

Radiation. 1988 Report to the General Assembly with Annexes, New York,

532

1988.

533

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation

534

(UNSCEAR), 2000. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. In: UNSCEAR

535

2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, United

536

Nations, New York.

537

Wei, L., Sugahara, T., 2000. An introductory overview of the epidemiological study

538

on the population at the high background radiation areas in Yangjiang, China.

539

J.Radiat. Res. 41, 1-7.

540

Yashodhara, I., Karunakara, N., Sudeep, Kumara, K., Rudramurthy, Tripathi, R.M.,

541

2011. Radiation levels and radionuclide distributions in soils of Gogi region, a

542

proposed uranium mining region in North Karnataka. Radiat. Prot. Environ.

543

34 (4), 267-269.

544

Yasuoka, Y., Sorimachi, A., Ishikawa, T., Hosoda, M., Tokonami, S., Fukuhori, N.,

545

Janik, M., 2010. Separately measuring Radon and Thoron concentrations

546

exhaled from soil using Alpha guard and Liquid scintillation counter methods.

547

Radiat. Protect. Dosim.141, (4), 412–415.

548 549 550

27

551

List of figures

552

Fig. 1. Map shows the sampling stations.

553

Fig. 2. Set‐up for measurement of 222Rn emanation.

554

Fig. 3. Set‐up for measurement of 220Rn emanation.

555

Fig. 4. Radon build up in sample from Karunagapalli for 1000-500 µm, 500- 250 µm,

556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564

250-125 µm, and <125 µm grain size fractions. Fig. 5. Radon build up in sample from Chavara for 1000-500 µm, 500- 250 µm, 250125 µm, and <125 µm grain size fractions. Fig. 6. Radon build up in sample from Neendakara for 1000-500 µm, 500- 250 µm, 250-125 µm, and <125 µm grain size fractions. Fig. 7. Radon build up in sample from Kovalam for 1000-500 µm, 500- 250 µm, 250-125 µm, and <125 µm grain size fractions. Fig. 8. Thoron concentration in various grain sizes (samples from Karunagapalli region).

565

Fig. 9. Thoron concentration in various grain sizes (samples from Chavara region)

566

Fig. 10. Thoron concentration in various grain sizes (samples from Neendakara

567

region).

568

Fig. 11. Thoron concentration in various grain sizes (samples from Kovalam region)

569

Fig. 12. Correlation between

570

222

Rn mass exhalation rate (mBq kg-1 h-1) and

activity (Bq kg-1).

28

226

Ra

571 572

Fig 13. Correlation between

220

Rn mass exhalation rate (Bq kg-1 h-1) and

228

Ra

activity (Bq kg-1).

573 574

List of tables

575

Table 1

576

Radium-226 (Bq kg-1),

577

coefficient for various grain size fractions for samples collected from Karunagapalli

578

(KI), Chavara (CH), Neendakara (N), and Kovalam (KM) regions.

222

Rn mass exhalation (mBq kg-1 h-1), and

222

Rn emanation

579 580

Table 2

581

Comparison of

582

concentrations in the dry samples.

222

Rn emanation fractions for a high

226

Ra (Bq kg-1) activity

583 584

Table 3

585

Radium-228 (Bq kg-1),

586

coefficient for various grain size for samples collected from Karunagapalli (KI),

587

Chavara (CH), Neendakara (N), and Kovalam (KM) regions.

220

Rn mass exhalation (Bq kg-1h-1), and

588 589 590 591 592 593 594 29

220

Rn emanation

595 596 597 598

599 600

Fig. 1. Map shows the sampling stations.

601 602 603 30

604 605 606 607 608

609

610

Fig. 2. Set‐up for measurement of 222Rn emanation.

611

612

613

614

615

616 31

617

618

619

620 621

Fig. 3. Set‐up for measurement of 220Rn emanation.

622

32

623 624 625 626 627

628 629

Fig. 4. Radon build up in sample from Karunagapalli for 1000-500 µm, 500- 250

630

µm, 250-125 µm, and <125 µm grain size fractions.

631 632 633

33

634 635 636 637 638 639

640 641

Fig. 5. Radon build up in sample from Chavara for 1000-500 µm, 500- 250 µm,

642

250-125 µm and <125 µm grain size fractions.

643 644

34

645 646 647 648 649 650

651 652

Fig. 6. Radon build up in sample from Neendakara for 1000-500 µm, 500- 250 µm,

653

250-125 µm and <125 µm grain size fractions.

654 655 656 657 658 659 35

660 661 662 663

664 665

Fig. 7. Radon build up in sample from Kovalam for 1000-500 µm, 500- 250 µm,

666

250-125 µm and <125 µm grain size fractions.

667 668 669 670 671

36

672 673 674 675

676 677

Fig. 8. Thoron concentration in various grain sizes (samples from Karunagapalli

678

region).

679 680 681 682 683

37

684 685 686 687 688

689 690

Fig. 9. Thoron concentration in various grain sizes (sample from Chavara region).

691 692 693 694 695 696 697 38

698 699 700 701

702 703

Fig. 10. Thoron concentration in various grain sizes (samples from Neendakara

704

region).

705 706 707 708 709

39

710 711 712 713 714 715

716 717

Fig. 11. Thoron concentration in various grain sizes (samples from Kovalam region).

718 719 720 721 40

722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729

730 731

Fig. 12. Correlation between 222Rn mass exhalation rate (mBq kg-1 h-1) and 226Ra

732

activity (Bq kg-1).

733 734 735 736 41

737 738 739 740 741 742

743

744

Fig. 13. Correlation between 220Rn mass exhalation rate (Bq kg-1 h-1) and 228Ra

745

activity (Bq kg-1).

746

747

42

748 749 750 751 752 753 754

Table 1

755

Radium-226 (Bq kg-1), 222Rn mass exhalation (mBq kg-1h-1), and 222Rn emanation

756

coefficient for various grain size fractions for samples collected from Karunagapalli

757

(KI), Chavara (CH), Neendakara (N), and Kovalam (KM) regions.

758 759 222

Sample size 226 Ra (µm) with (Bq kg-1) Location ID KI <125 2395 ± 10 KI 250-125 328 ± 4 KI 500-250 82.8 ± 6.0 KI 1000-500 19.2 ± 1.1 CH <125 6816 ± 36 CH 250-125 1269 ± 11 CH 500-250 299 ± 2 CH 1000-500 44.6 ± 2.4 N <125 6923 ± 24 N 250-125 1394 ± 9 N 500-250 653 ± 6 N 1000-500 9.3 ± 0.8 KM <125 6146 ± 19 KM 250-125 224 ± 13 KM 500-250 29.9 ± 1.3 KM 1000-500 51.8 ± 1.8

Rn mass exhalation (mBq kg-1 h-1) 6.9 ± 0.9 3.9 ± 1.1 1.5 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.2 9.8 ± 1.1 3.1 ± 0.9 2.2 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 0.1 4.8 ± 1.3 2.9 ± 1.0 2.7 ± 1.3 1.9 ± 0.1 11.0 ± 0.9 3.5 ± 0.6 1.0 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.1

760 761 762 763 43

222

Rn emanation coefficient (40 ± 5)×10-5 (16 ± 4)×10-4 (24 ± 6)×10-4 (45 ± 11)×10-4 (20 ± 2) ×10-5 (30 ± 9)×10-5 (10 ± 3)×10-4 (30 ± 4)×10-4 (10 ± 3)×10-5 (3 ± 1)×10-4 (6 ± 3)×10-4 (26 ± 3)×10-3 (20 ± 2)×10-5 (20 ± 4)×10-4 (21 ± 3)×10-4 (33 ± 5)×10-4

764 765 766 767

Table 2

768

Comparison of

769

concentrations in the dry samples.

222

Rn emanation fractions for a high

226

Ra (Bq kg-1) activity

770

Samples

226

Ra (Bq kg-1)

222

Rn emanation fraction

References

Monazite grain size of 100-200 µm Zircon

(22.3 ± 1.1) × 103

3.0 ×10-4

(3.8 ± 2.9) × 103

1.0 ×10-4

Uraninite<63µm (Canada) Monazite <63 µm

(58.3 ± 0.7)× 105

5.3 ×10-3

(17.6 ± 0.4) ×103

(20.5 ± 0.3)×10-3

Zircon+Monazite 100-200 µm

(26.5 ± 1.3) ×103

5.0 ×10-4

Rama and Moore, 1984 Rama and Moore, 1990 Garver and Baskaran, 2004 Garver and Baskaran, 2004 Rama and Moore, 1984

Monazite grain size 125-1000 µm

9.3 ± 0.8 - 6923 ± 24 (range)

(10.0 ± 2.8)×10-5 (26.0 ± 2.7)×10-3 (range)

771

772 773 774 775 776

44

Present Study

777 778 779 780 781

Table 3

782

Radium-228 (Bq kg-1),

783

coefficient for various grain size of Karunagapalli (KI), Chavara (CH), Neendakara

784

(N) and Kovalam (KM).

220

Rn mass exhalation (Bq kg-1h-1), and

220

Rn emanation

785

Sample size (µm) with Location ID KI <125 KI 250-125 KI 500-250 KI 1000-500 CH <125 CH 250-125 CH 500-250 CH 1000-500 N <125 N 250-125 N 500-250 N 1000-500 KM <125 KM 250-125 KM 500-250 KM 1000-500

220

228

Ra (Bq kg-1) 11279 ± 39 793 ± 9 186 ± 2 44.6 ± 1.8 (44.38 ± 0.21) ×103 6224 ± 40 1189 ± 8 212 ± 4 (41.77 ± 0.12) ×103 5994 ± 35 1893 ± 17 35.0 ± 1.9 34731 ± 92 (2.75 ± 0.14) ×103 265 ± 5 107 ± 4

Rn mass exhalation (Bq kg-1 h-1) 965 ± 3 669 ± 7 354 ± 4 94.0 ± 3.8 3066 ± 14 2456 ± 16 441 ± 3 191 ± 4 1877 ± 5 770 ± 5 494 ± 4 88.5 ± 4.8 2076 ± 6 1597 ± 83 251 ± 5 101 ± 3

45

220

786

Rn emanation 787 coefficient (200 ± 1)×10-5 -4 (190 ± 2)×10788 (420 ± 5)×10-4 (46 ± 2) ×10-3 (200 ± 1)×10-5 (90 ± 1)×10-4 (80 ± 1)×10-4 (200 ± 4)×10-4 (100 ± 3)×10-5 (300 ± 2)×10-5 (60 ± 1)×10-4 (56 ± 3)×10-3 (1000 ± 3)×10-6 (13 ± 1)×10-3 (210 ± 4)×10-4 (210 ± 7)×10-4

HIGHLIGHTS •

This study throws light on the relative contribution of the monazite minerals to 222Rn and 220



Rn release in the environment.

Monazite rich samples have low emantion coefficient and are not the highest contributor of 222Rn and 220Rn to the environment.



Radon and thoron emanation coefficient was higher in 1000-500 µm grain size fractions, which contained least 226Ra and 228Ra activity (Bq kg-1).



Unlike 226Ra and 228Ra activity concentrations, 222Rn and 220Rn emanation coefficient did not increase with the finer grain size; rather, opposite trend was observed.



The statistically significant correlation coefficient substantiated the dependency of mass exhalation rate (Bq kg-1 h-1) and

228

Ra activity (Bq kg-1), also between

exhalation rate (mBq kg-1 h-1) and 226Ra activity (Bq kg-1).

222

220

Rn

Rn mass