Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Physics, 48 (1983) 291-294 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
In terna tional
MASS
SPECTROMETRIC
A. ZEMAN
and
ANALYSIS
OF MALODOROUS
AIR
POLLUTANTS
FROM
291
SEWAGE
PLANTS
K. KOCH
Chemistry Dept., (West Germany)
German
Armed
Forces
University
Munich,
D-8014
Neubiberg
ABSTRACT Thermal desorption GC*MS in the CI(NH3) mode is a sensitive and-specific method for analyzing malodorous compounds adsorbed on activated carbon used in air purification systems of sewage plants, animal breeding stations etc. With the use of mass spectrometric profiles the air purification process can be evaluated not only with respect to the malodorous and/or toxic substances it is intended to remove but also in recognition of the most abundant substances present, which can control its effectiveness. I NTRODUCTEON Air pollution ter
houses,
etc.,
decomposition bons, are
by malodorous
fatty
formed
is a serious
of carbohydrates acids,
fatty
(see also
ted carbon
filter
particular,
Our recent
GC-MS
have
carbons
usually
present
trometric cation
shown
of trace
hydrocarbons
that
that
in this
piggeries,
By anaerobic
complex
of hydrocar-
N- and S-compounds
of the malodorous
and/or
air using
the air treatment
toxic
slaugh-
and aerobic
mixtures
and especially
To monitor
would
high
components,
allows
and similar
selective
emissions present
activa-
process,
in
an effective
detection,
Recent
from municipal
prevents odour
direct
(ref.51
hidden
have
hydroidentifi-
impact
profile.
identification
of interest
results
sewage
of non odorous
in the electron
by a GC2MS
of compounds
be welcome.
emissions
concentration
of a malodour
concentrations
be solved
on odour the
of the osmogenes
characterization method
Iem might
necessary.
plants,
problem. very
1). Purification
of malodorous
and quantification
thus,
ketones
investigations
(ref.l-4)
and,
aldehydes,
sewage
is needed.
plants
cation
environmental proteins
is often
method
from
and
Table
the removal
analytical
emissions
mode
A mass
spec-
and quantifiin the bulk
shown
that
the
of prob-
by CI(NH3)MS.
METHODS GC-MS
profiles
ted carbon flow port,
rate with
were
samples 10 ml min the
obtained
from -1
normal
air
a Finnigan
purification
, desorption injection
0020-~381/83/000~0000/$03.00
using
0
time port
filters 10 min)
liner
4000
COM GC-MS
were
desorbed
in the glass
using
a device
1983 ElsevierScientific Publishing
system.
Activa-
at 25O'C
(helium
capillary
similar
Company
injection
to the
one
292 described with sed min
in ref.6.
The column
a 50 m x 0.25
mm
glass
I.D.
capillary
coated
OV 101; the
temperature was held during desorption at -lO'C, then increa-1 ; the carrier gas was helium at a flow rate of 1 ml at 2'C min
to 200°C -1 . The GC capillary
mass
was
spectra
as reagent 0.3 torr.
were
gas.
was
recorded
The ammonia
The ion source
combined
directly
with
continually
with
an Incas
flow
rate was
temperature
was
the
adJusted P50°C
ion source.
data
Positive
system,
using
to an ion source
and
the
ionization
CI
ammonia
pressure
energy
of
70 eV.
RESULTS Fig.1 sample wage
shows
the GC*ELMS
of activated
profile
carbon
(RIG) of a thermal
obtained
from
desorbate
a malfunctioning
air
from filter
a 2 mg of a se-
plant.
EI-RIC
T
1000 16:40 7
:F%
Fig. 1. GC'EIMS profile desorption in the GC-MS Detailed peaks
mass
observed
chlorinated dimethyl
are mainly
hydrocarbons
The most
solvent column
spectrometric
sulfides.
tified.
With
extraction
racterize
the usual found
the
easily
aliphatic
in polluted
carbon This
Clearly
and/or
and
and aromatic plus
removal
GC2EIMS
compounds
obtained
the problem
only
The
hydrocarbons
and
some
and
of the
profile .adsorbed
traces
ketones
1) can only
is lengthy
by thermal
outlined.
phthalates
(see Table
procedure
the
toxic
air
carbon
in addition,
osmogenes
on silica. occur.
evidences
EICP method
of activated
the osmogenes
of activated
analysis
characteristic
chromatography
of volatiles
from a sample system.
be found
hydrocarbons and tedious,
can not
are
be used
in the carbon
of idenby
by losses to chafilter,
293 and
thus
its effectivity.
Reports scarce.
on CI(NH3)MS
Ammonia
is mostly
ionize
preferentially
ristic
osmogenes
used
osmogenes
classes
to serve
nitrogen
of biogenic
1. Typical
Table
of different
as a highly
(ref.
in emissions
Table
from
reagent
(ref.51
1) also
sewage
are still
compounds
selective
We reported
compounds. origin
of organic
were
that
gas to
the characte-
preferentially
plants
CH3 ‘51-4 CH3’
G-lH2n+l n=l-l, Aikylthiophene
Is‘lbccoc”H2n+I n= 1,2 Acylthiophene
P
Dimethyl (poly)sulfide
~Tz..~,Rz24kR~Tx~ R3’ Qk L
k
Y
Mono-,di-, trialkylpyrazine
Q
cxv3
Jndole
2-Methyli ndole
Pyridin e
FdMo”rtehY’(Skatole) ionized
in contrast
are observed
and
Fig.
the GC2CI(NH3)MS
2 shows
No peaks tained used
can be used
corresponding
by direct
The
profile
desorption
for qualitative
process
following
to establish
because
questions
intense
(M+H)+
an osmogene
(RIG) of the
to hydrocarbons
thermal
advantageously
purification
Very
to hydrocarbons.
can
and/or
it is a real
specific
sample
be found.
of activated
carbon
from
odour this
what
the components
preferentially
actually
desorption
we now
amount desorbed
of sample
realized (ca.
and thermal
can
the
be
air
of low recovery that
1-2 mg) artifact
this
and artifact
is not a serious
is desorbed. formation
adsorbed
on
adsorbed?
iii) what is the adsorption capacity of the air filter depending ponents under the conditions of air purification employed? possibility
ob-
can be evaluated:
ii)
the
1.
profile,
the filter,
monitoring'of
are the odorous and/or toxic substances to be removed activated carbon and what is their concentration?
Concerning
profile. in Fig.
profile.
1)
are
(M+NH4)+ions
presented
Therefore
quantitative odour
and/or
Also
high
formation problem
boilers
is not observed.
on certain during
if a very like
indole
com-
thermal low can
be
294
CI(NH$-RIC
1000 16:40 Fig.L. GC2CI(NH3)MS
1500
2000 33:20
25:QO profile
from
the
sample
2500 E= 41:40 shown
in Fig.
1
REFERENCES 1 2 3 4 5 6
P. Bartl, A. Schaaff and A. Zeman, gwf-Wasser/Abwasser 120 (1979) 269-274. A. Zeman and H. Hagenguth, APCA 73rd Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, June 1980, Paper 80-40.7. 122 (1981) H. Hagenguth, H. Teichmann and A. Zeman, gwf-Wasser/Abwasser 263-269. A. Zeman and K. Koch, APCA 74th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, USA, June 1981, Paper 81-15.5. A. Zeman and K. Koch, J. Chromatogr., 216 (1981) 199-207. H. Peterson, G.A. Eiceman, L.R. Field and R.A. Sievers, Anal. Chem. 50 (1978) 2152-2154.