Mathematical physics and the physician

Mathematical physics and the physician

Annotations Mathematical physics One of the facts of life is that in only a few specializations, among them the cardiovascular, is the background o...

90KB Sizes 1 Downloads 86 Views

Annotations

Mathematical

physics

One of the facts of life is that in only a few specializations, among them the cardiovascular, is the background of physicians in mathematics and physics totally inadequate; in most of the medical field (general practice, surgery, obstetrics, pediatrics, psychiatry, the greater part of internal medicine, etc.), hardly any or no mathematics at all is needed. The consequence of this is that it is impractical and certainly impossible to adapt the curriculum to the needs of the relatively small group. This is especiallyso since these needs are far greater than is generally realized. The only thing that could be done, anti which has sometunes been tried without success, is to supply the needs of the small group during the time of their specialization. Why did these attempts fail in most cases? Chiefly because the problem of time involved is usually underrated by teachers and students. Because we do not like unpleasant facts, we close our eyes to them. It is an unpleasant fact that nowadays for fruitful research in several medical fields a background in classic physics is needed that is equivalent to that of the well-trained physicist. When the physician cannot acquire this background in a few hours, he is inclined to lose courage and quit. Practically always the teacher has to try to take a shortcut and teach all the necessary mathematics in a very short time by giving a so-called “popular” course, which actually is more a course in mystics than in mathematics. \Ve need not wonder that the only result is a well-cultivated inferiority complex among the students. When the course is

Etiology

of pre-eclampsia

The etiology of specific hypertensive disease of pregnancy has long remained an enigma. Although eclampsia has been recognized as a clinical entit! from antiquity, the primary pathogenetic factor has escaped detection despite extensive clinical study. During the nineteenth century, eclampsia was variously regarded as a form of Bright’s disease, as a primary disease of the iiver, and even as a condition comparable to parturient paresis in cattle. The latter concept led to the practice of mastectomy

710

and the physician

rigorous a11t1 good, the result is nil also, because our medical doctors are not mentally prepared for the amount of self-study and homework that is required. Mq Eh @dwqv &rpanov em yto~e+pra”. “To mathematics there is no path for kings,” and I w:ould like to add, not even for doctors! \2’hen a young doctor wants to specialize and do research work in the cardiovascular lield, he has to be prepared to follow during the first four years of his training three hours of rigorous mathematics and physics lectures per week, lectures that will require from him at least 2 hours of intensive homework per day, weekends not excluded! Hoa this has to be titted into his schedule is his problem and that of the chairman of the department. It is a pity if this problem cannot be solved, for then vvve have to be satisfied to gradually leave more and more of our research to physicists who are willing to spend an equivalent amount of time acquiring knowledge in the cardiovascular field. Teamwork betv,een a physician who knows nothing about physics and a physicist who knows nothing about medicine may seem an attractive substitute, but it does not work. Teamworkers have to understand each other’s language and problems thoroughly. Our young cardiologists have to take the whole dive into the mathematical ocean; just dipping their big toe into the water will irot be sufficient.

eclampsia

as a therapeutic measure, as advocated by Sellheim.6 With the development of a satisfactory practical technique for measurement of blood pressure at the turn of the century, pre-eclampsia was recognized as a hypertensive state preceding the development of convulsions or coma. Subsequently, Volhard,* in 1918, properly emphasized the primary vascular nature of pre-eclampsia eclampsia. However, until recent years a confused state of affairs relative to etiology and diagnosis persisted, as evidenced by