203
Thermochimica Acta, 163 (1990) 203-210 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
MEASUREMENT OF ISOBARIC SPECIFIC HEAT OF HCFC-123 IN THE LIQUID PHASE
S. Nakagawa,
H. Sato, and K. Watanabe
Thermodynamics Laboratory Department of Mechanical Engineering Facuhy of Science and Technology Keio University 3-14-1, Hiyoshi Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223 (Japan)
SUMMARY The isobaric
heat capacity,
CFC-11 has been measured
Cp, of HCFC-123 which is a prospective
by using a flow-calorimeter
values have been determined
at temperatures
0.5 MPa to 3.0 MPa. The uncertainty +2 kPa in pressure the experimental
alternative
to
in the liquid phase. Sixty-nine
Cp
from 276 K to 410 K and pressures
was estimated
and rt0.4 % in Cp, respectively.
from
being within e 10 mK in temperature, A Cp correlation
which is effective in
range has been also developed.
INTRODUCTION It is our
urgent
alternatives.
task
to
develop
HCFC-123(CHCI,CF,)
stratospherically
is one
of the
safe
prospective
CFC(chlorofluorocarbon) alternatives
to
CFC-11 (CCI,F) which has been widely used as a blowing agent and as a working turbo-compressor
driven refrigeration
isobaric heat capacity
machines
replace fluid for
and heat pumps. This paper reports the
data of liquid HCFC-123. The purity of HCFC-123 used in this study
was 99.83 wt%.
PRINCIPLE
AND APPARATUS
Isobaric
specific
performance agent,
but
heat
or heat transfer it is not
thermodynamic
easy
equation
is an
important
problems
for applications
to get the values
of state developed
reliable specific heat values are not determined phase,
especially
0040-6031/90/$03.50
property
at high pressures.
for
calculating
as a working
by predictions
thermodynamic fluid or a blowing
or calculations
on the basis of PV7 property theoretically
We selected
but experimentally
flow-calorimetry
0 1990 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
from
a
data. The most in the liquid
for determining
the
204 absolute values of specific heat of liquids.
This
compensate leakage
amount
of heat
already
isobaric
and
liquid
calorimeter
HFC-1 34at2J in
the
with
the
is shown
tubing
diameter
of
sheathed whose
9.35
stainless
outer
mm steel
at
outer tubing
heat flux to sample
fluid.
100
resistance
hermometer
in
and supplies Two
pump
in Fig. 1. A
is 1.6 mm is inserted
center
To vacuurr
The main part of
5.5 n microheater
diameter
for
of 50.4 % and 20.3
%, respectively.
SUS316
liquid.
heats
phases
uncertainties
n
platinum
thermometers
50 mm
I
sheath-
ed in SUS316 tubing whose outer diameter
shield
measured
specific
CFC-114(l)
Radiation
at various
rates of sample
have
their
can
by measuring
mass-flow We
the
method
Fig. 1. Cross-section
of the calorimeter.
is 1.6 mm are placed at
the center of 6.35 mm outer diameter
stainless
steel
tubing
inlet and outlet thermometers. explanation
of the present
The flow-calorimetry
as They were calibrated
apparatus
has been published
consists of three simultaneous
heat flux 6, and temperature
increment
according
to IPTS-68. A detailed
previouslyc3).
measurements;
mass-flow
LT. Specific heat Co is determined
rate fi,
by the following
relation:
C/J= Cj/ (rf~AT)
Equation temperature
(1) is true change
(1)
only
in the case
of an ideal
condition
without
due to sample liquid flowing. The heat leakage
heat
loss nor
is compensated
by
pe~orm~ng example
plural measurements
of measured
with different
rates. Figure 2 shows typical
Cp including heat loss versus reciprocal
the heat loss 0‘ into consideration,
Cp = 61 (r-hAT) +
mass-flow
of mass-flow rate. By taking
Eq. (1) becomes,
d,/ @AT).
where 0, will be eliminated
(2)
at the infinitely large mass-flow
rate, or by reducing
6, itself.
The heat loss appears as a slope of the lines in Fig. 2.
0 Fig.
2. Relation between the measured specific heat reciprocal of mass-flow rate, h-l, in flow-calorimetry. The temperature
measurements
because
AT was controlled always
mass-flow increment between without
the maximum
by
without
measu~ng heating
rate as those
by microheater
of measurements
by microheater.
liquid flowing
difference
between
the
associated
with heating.
This process compensates
was outlet and
The temperature differences
with heating
the temperature temperature
and
pressure,
from the sum of those temperature in both cases of the processes
increment change
inlet
at the same temperature,
and other effects. The maximum
inlet and outlet thermometers at higher temperatures.
the heat flux 6. The temperature
temperature
inlet and outlet thermometers
to sample
and
flow rate was 0.16 g/s. The temperature
LITin Eq. (1) was determined
heating
CpexP,
due to sample iiquid flowing was very small in the present
to be 5 K by regulating
monitored
thermometers
change
values,
change
change
and due
between
in the case of the process without heating was about 40 mK
206
Metering pump
(b) T
AC
Sampling l13 vessel 8
(e) 3 11
Needle valve T I#-#\ Q
3-way valve
Fig. 3. Flow assembly.
A schematic
diagram
in the system completely by a metering
of flow assembly
is shown in Fig. 3. The sample
in the liquid phase. The sample liquid is circulated
pump (a), where the pulsation
due to the metering
means of the metallic bellows installed in sampling
(9. The sample pressure is controlled metallic bellows the sampling
r5
difference
is installed
mK at a required of sampling
in the system
pump is absorbed
vessel (g) and accumulators,
by means of the pressure
of nitrogen
(9 through calorimeter
in a thermostated temperature.
(b) and
(b) to
(c) and needle valve (d).
bath where the temperature
The mass-flow
by
gas filled in
(b). The sample fluid flows from the accumulator
vessel (g) or accumulator
The calorimeter within
of accumulator
fluid is filled
rate is determined
is controlled from mass
vessel (g) placed on a digital balance and the time period.
MEASUREMENTS The measurements
were performed
at temperatures
from 275.65
K to 410 K and
207
0
2
Fig. 4. The present
pressures
from
measured
Cp values,
plotted
against
determined
Cp measurements
8 rfr' (s g-1)
at reciprocal
of various
10
mass-flow
rates.
0.5 MPa to 3.0 MPa. In order to know the effect of heat loss in the 138 data were measured
the reciprocals
of mass-flow
from the 138 measurements.
than 2 IO mK in temperature 2 10 mK in temperature, determined
6
4
increment,
at various
mass-flow
rates which were
rate in Fig. 4. Sixty-nine
final results were
The uncertainty
of the measurements
~0.02 % in heat flux, 20.2 % in mass-flow rate, and
and +2 kPa in pressure, respectively.
Cp values is concluded
is better
The overall uncertainty
of
to be better than 20.4 %. These results are plotted in
Fig. 5.
DISCUSSIONS Figure 4 shows the present measurements The specific heat values do not depend in the present the uncertainty
measurements
of mass-flow
rate.
upon the mass-flow rates which means heat loss
is small enough
of ~0.4 % as discussed
against the reciprocal
above.
to determine
the specific heat values with
208
A correlation
was developed
on the basis of the data measured
in the liquid phase
by least squares fitting with simple polynomials;
Cp = A(T)P
A(T ) =
(3)
+ B(T)
a, /(I - Tr ) + a2 /(l - Tr )".5 - Tr )'.5+ b, /(1 - Tr ) + b3 /(I - Tr )".5
B(T ) = b, /(l
a, = -0.005177
a, =
b, =
b2 = -0.4027
0.05824
0.007561 b, =
1.1235
where P and Tr denote pressure in MPa and temperature Cp is given
in kJ/(kg
K). The critical temperature
Tanikawa et al.t41 Equation(S)
of Tr = T / Tc, respectively,
Tc is 456.86
is effective in a range of temperatures
K which
reported
between
and by
275.65 K and
1.35 g+ 1.30 b 3 Q o
4
HCFC-123
4 4 410 K
1.25 ----@+---@400
K
1.20 1.15 1.10 1.05 1 .oo
b
-4-----P----~ 275.65
K
0.95 0.0
Fig. 5. Experimental HCFC-123.
1.0
2.0 Pressure
data and the correlation for the isobaric
3.0 (MPa)
specific
heat
of liquid
209
400 K and pressures is estimated
up to 3 MPa. The uncertainty
better than 20.6 %. Equation
Fig. 5. The Cp values of saturated pressures
reported
of calculated
(3) is compared
Cp values from Eq. (3)
with the experimental
liquid HCFC-123 calculated
data in
from Eq. (3) at the vapor
by Piao et a1.r5Jare also given in Fig. 5 and these values are compared
with those of CFC-11 c6Jin Fig. 6 for the practical use of HCFC-123 as an alternative
fluid
to CFC-11.
I
1.35
h k
1.30
’
m
1.25
-
y
1.20
*
a -
1.15
-
op
1.10
.
1.05
-
0.95
-
0.90
./
I
I
I
CFC-11
0.85
, 260
1
280
300
320
340
360
380
Temperature Fig. 6. Comparison of the present correlation for HCFC-123 the saturation states.
400
420
(K) with that of CFC-11 c6)at
CONCLUSION Isobaric
specific
temperatures estimated
of
HCFC-123
were
from 275.65 K to 410 K and pressures
uncertainty
temperatures developed.
heats
between
of 20.4 275.65
The uncertainty
than 20.6 %.
%. The correlation
measured
liquid
phase
at
from 0.5 MPa to 3.0 MPa with the which
is effective
K and 400 K, and pressures
of calculated
in the
in the
range
of
up to 3 MPa was also
specific heat values from the correlation
is better
210
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We acknowledge
the assistance
Atsusi Saitoh in the development for Scientific Science
Research
of Hideo Miyahara in the present measurements
of this apparatus.
Fund in 1989(Project
and Culture of Japan and a support
We are indebted
No.01603022) of Tokyo
and
to the Grant-in-Aid
of the Ministry of Education,
Electric Power Co., Ltd. We are
also grateful to Asahi Glass Co., Ltd., Japan, for kindly furnishing the sample of HCFC-123.
REFERENCES 1
2 3
4
5
6
H. Sato, N. Sakate, M. Ashizawa, M. Uematsu, and K. Watanabe, Measurement of the isobaric specific heat capacity for liquid dichlorotetrafluoroethane(R 114), Proc. 1987 ASME-JSME Therm. Eng. Joint Conf., 4 (1987) 351-358. A. Saitoh, H. Sato, and K. Watanabe, Isobaric heat capacity data for liquid HFC134a, submitted to J. Chem. Eng. Data, (1989). A. Saitoh, H. Sato, and K. Watanabe, A new apparatus for the measurement of the isobaric heat capacity of liquid refrigerants, Int. J. of Thermophys., 1O(3) (1989) 649659. S. Tanikawa, Y. Kabata, H. Sato, and K. Watanabe, Measurements of the vaporliquid coexistence curve in the critical region of HCFC-123, Proc. 2nd Asian Thermophys. Prop. (1989) 513-518. C.-C. Piao, H. Sato, and K. Watanabe, Measurements of the saturated vapor pressure and PVT property of HCFC-123, to be presented at the 1989 JAR Ann. Conf. (1989). A. F. Benning, Ft. C. McHarness, W. H. Markwood, Jr., and W. J. Smith, Heat of three fluorochloromethanes and capacity of the liquid and vapor trifluorotrichloroethane, Int. Eng. Chem., 32(7) (1940) 976-980.